No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Newaldaya Lifescapes

7511 University Avenue, Cedar Falls, IA 50613 · Non profit - Corporation · 112 certified beds · (319) 268-0401 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited Apr 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation$132,074 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • the CMS record shows $132,074 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-27)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6912 University Ave · (319) 266-5934 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
103 E 18th St · (641) 228-4137 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.5 mi
315 Brandilynn Blvd.
Park
(319) 273-8624 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.0%17.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%4.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.5%4.2%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.8%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.0%16.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.9%20.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.8%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.5%19.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.3%73.3%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.7%20.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.8%13.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.011.491.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.092.081.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 160 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.0%CMS range 48.5–59.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.6–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.9–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.631.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.65
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.52
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
41.6%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 101.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.13 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.70 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-22)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-06-27 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #68 MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified a BIMS score of 5, indicating a severe cognitive loss. The MDS documented Resident #68 required substantial/maximal (the helper does more than half the effort. The helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort) assistance to roll left and right while lying in bed along with sit to lying positions. Resident #68 need total staff assistance with transfers out of bed. The MDS included diagnoses of progressive neurological conditions, non Alzheimer's dementia, and neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies (a condition severe loss of thinking abilities that interfere with daily activities). The Care Plan Focus dated 5/24/24 identified Resident #68 had a potential for falls due to decreased mobility, poor safety awareness, and fatigue. The Intervention dated on 9/5/23 directed Hospice would replace the bed with longer ½ bed rail and a winged mattress to help provide bed boundary. The Care Plan Focus revised 7/20/23 indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility records, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent a resident from being physically restrained when a gait belt was placed around the resident's waist and a secured with a second gait belt to the recliner for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 104.Findings Include:Resident #1's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented an admission date of 12/28/25. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS listed potential indicators of psychosis (mental health symptom involving a disconnection) of hallucinations (Sensing, seeing, or hearing things that are not actually there). Resident #1 required partial/moderate assistance (Helper does less than half the effort. Helper lifts, holds, or supports trunk or limbs, but provides less than half the effort) for lying to sitting on the side of the bed, sitting to standing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the staff who applied lidocaine patches (topical medication that delivers local anesthetic lidocaine through the skin to provide pain relief) signed the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). Instead, another staff member documented the administration of the treatments for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #16 and #20). The facility reported a census of 102 residents. Findings include: Resident #16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] reflected they received pain medication in the previous 5 days and had occasional pain. Resident #16's May 2025 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) included an order dated 10/5/24 for lidocaine external patch 5%. The order directed to apply to left hip topically for pain in the morning (AM) and then off at hour of sleep (hs). Resident #16's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected they received pain medication in the previous 5 days and had occasional pain.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, electronic health record (EHR) review, personnel file review, policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to demonstrate proper Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when flushing a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the stomach through a small incision in the abdominal wall also referred to as a g-tube) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 102 residents. Findings include: Resident #117's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed an admission date of 10/29/24. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of cancer, anemia (low iron level in the blood), quadriplegia (inability to move all four extremities of the body), non-Alzheimer's dementia, and chronic atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm. Resident #117's EHR reviewed 5/21/25 reflected she had an Infection Prevention Control measure of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, policy review and observations the facility failed to notify a family member about a resident's fall with injury for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 101. Findings include: Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of medically complex illness, coronary artery disease (problems with the arteries of the heart), osteoporosis, and anxiety. Resident #1 had a which indicated Resident #1 alert and oriented. The Bedside [NAME] Report dated 1/22/25 directed the staff to check and change Resident #1 and use a Hoyer lift with 2 staff for transfers to the commode. The report included to not leave Resident #1 alone on the commode. Resident #1 utilized a wheelchair and a walker for mobility. The Incident Note dated 1/23/25 at 3:01 AM, Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to respect the resident's right and dignity to have a bath twice a week per resident request for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #98); and failed to provide toileting in a timely manner which resulted in bowel incontinence and emotional distress for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #311). The facility reported a census of 101 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #98's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #98 required substantial to maximal assistance (a helper does more than half the effort. The helper lifts or holds the trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort with showering/bathing). The MDS included diagnoses of anemia (low blood iron), hypertension (high blood pressure), urinary tract infection (UTI), diabetes, pneumonia and stage 3 pressure ulcer. The Activities of Daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #54's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety, quadriplegia (paralysis of all four extremities), type II diabetes, and schizophrenia (mood disorder that can cause hallucinations and delusions). The MDS documented the resident had a stage 4 pressure ulcer. The Progress Note dated 2/12/24 at 3:00 PM reflected Resident #54's Stage 4 pressure ulcer on his coccyx as healed. During an interview on 6/25/24 at 1:01 PM Staff A, MDS Coordinator, reported she would have to look back at her notes for Resident #54's MDS about his Stage 4 pressure ulcer. During an interview on 6/26/24 at 1:43 PM Staff A reported she made an error when she coded Resident #54 had a stage 4 pressure ulcer. She reported it healed on 2/12/24. She reported the facility followed the MDS policy and also the Resident assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed submit a new Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for review for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #72) for review after receiving new diagnoses in his medical record. The facility reported a census of 101 residents. Findings include: Resident #72's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Staff Assessment for Mental Status indicating he had a memory problem and severely impaired decision-making skills. The MDS included diagnoses of dementia, depression, and psychotic disorder. Record review of a Progress Note for Resident #72 dated 5/8/24 by his Nurse Practitioner documented new diagnosis of: a. Dementia with behavioral disturbance b. Current severe episode of major depressive disorder with psychotic features without prior episode c. Anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition Record review of Resident #72 current PASRR on 6/26/24 lacked diagnoses of: a. Dementia with behavioral disturbance b.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to include the use of psychotropic medications and what to look for when using the medications for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #35) on the Baseline Care Plan upon admission. The reported a census of 101 residents. Findings include: Resident #35's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The Progress Note dated 4/19/24 listed Resident #35's admission orders to the facility on 5/16/24. The orders included anti depressants, opioids, and anti anxiety medications. Resident #35's admission Baseline Care Plan dated 5/16/24 lacked documentation that she received psychotropic medications and what side effects for staff to monitor related to the use anti depressants, opioids, and anti anxiety drug class medications present upon admission. During an interview on 6/27/24 at 11:13 AM Staff I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), explained she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed update the Care Plan to include interventions related to new mental health diagnoses for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #72). In addition, the facility failed to revise the Care Plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #31) after initiating antibiotic therapy. The facility reported a census of 101 residents. Findings Include: 1. Resident #72's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Staff Assessment for Mental Status indicating he had a memory problem and severely impaired decision-making skills. The MDS included diagnoses of dementia, depression, and psychotic disorder. Record review of a Progress Note for Resident #72 dated 5/8/24 by his Nurse Practitioner documented new diagnosis of: a. Dementia with behavioral disturbance b. Current severe episode of major depressive disorder with psychotic features without prior episode c. Anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition Resident #72's Care Plan dated 6/26/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to complete routine pre- and post-dialysis assessments for 1 of 1 resident who received dialysis services at the facility (Resident #33). The facility reported a census of 101 residents. Findings include: Resident #33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] reflected he received dialysis services. Resident #33's Clinical Physician Orders included the following orders a. Dated 8/16/23: Weekly weights on Wednesdays. b. Dated 6/26/24: Nurse to complete pre/post dialysis assessments on Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays, and as needed on dialysis days. Resident #33's Weights and Vitals reviewed on 6/27/24 lacked weights on 1/10/24, 1/24/24, 4/10/24, 8/8/24 and 6/5/24. Resident #33's electronic health record (EHR) assessments reviewed on 6/27/24 lacked pre and post dialysis assessments from 4/25/24 to 6/13/24 on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. During an interview on 6/27/24 at 11:09 AM with Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-06-27 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to complete an Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the required timeframe for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #54). The facility reported a census of 101 residents. Findings include: Resident #54's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 8, indicating moderately cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), anxiety, quadriplegia (paralysis of all four extremities), type II diabetes, and schizophrenia (mood disorder that causes hallucinations and delusions). Resident #54 MDS Summary reviewed on 6/27/24 at 9:17 AM reflected an assessment reference date (ARD) for the annual MDS as 4/17/24. The summary listed a completion and locked date of 6/5/24. During an interview on 6/25/24 at 1:01 PM Staff A, MDS Coordinator, reported when the facility changed to electronic charting software, Resident #54 kept having a discharge MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-06-27 · tag F0637 — pattern
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Long Term Care (LTC) Facility Resident assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual review, and staff interview the facility failed to completed a Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within the required time frame for 1 of 3 residents sampled for hospice care (Resident #96). The facility reported a census of 101 residents. Findings include: Resident #96 Electronic Census showed they started hospice level of care on 5/2/24. Resident #96's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Summary Page reflected a Significant Change in Status MDS assessment dated [DATE]. Sections D, E, F, and Q reflected a green color indicating completed for those assessment sections. Sections A, B, C, GG, H, I, J, K, L, N, M, N, O, P were colored yellow indicating in-progress. The box listed as Completed showed a red color directing to complete by 5/23/24. The Care Area Assessments (CAA) box indicated complete by 5/23/24 and complete the Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$132,074 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $132,074 — penalty dated 2024-06-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CEDAR FALLS LUTHERAN HOMEOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/15/2015
CURLEY, AMYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/13/2025
FISHEL, JEFFIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/13/2025
GILLETT, DARRINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/13/2025
HEINEN, ANNELIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/13/2025
KESTNER, DIANEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/13/2025
LUPKES, BEVERLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/13/2025
MCHOLM, DREWIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/13/2025
SPEARS, RONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/13/2025
HATCH, SHELLEENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/09/2025
JASPER, CRYSTALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
O'NEILL-GLEASON, ERINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2017
RAMESH, PRADEEPIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/28/2025
SCHEFF, DAWNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/14/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-45.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 3%Other / private 37%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$474per resident / day
operating cost
$14,420per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$327per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165465. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next