No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Northbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

6420 Council Street NE, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (319) 393-1447 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Oct 20231 immediate-jeopardy citation$38,787 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $38,787 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-21)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1030 Blairs Ferry Rd NE · (833) 719-2431 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5825 Dry Creek Ln NE · (844) 366-7916 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
931 Blairs Ferry Rd NE
Park
101 N B Ave · (319) 393-1515 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.3%17.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%1.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.7%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.0%4.2%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%3.8%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.3%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.4%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.3%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.7%19.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.1%73.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.1%20.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.9%13.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.761.491.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.222.081.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.7%CMS range 29.7–57.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.5–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.3–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.44
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.14
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
56.8%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 81.5 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-14)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, hospital record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error from occurring. Resident #2 received Glimepiride 2 mg for 77 days without a diagnosis of diabetes or a physician's order. The nurse on duty at the time the order was received entered another resident's order in this resident's electronic health record (EHR). Over the 77 day timeframe, 11 nurses/Certified Medication Aides (CMA) who administered the medication, the Director of Nursing (DON), the provider (at least 3 visits including a med review visit), and the pharmacy consultant (at least 3 Drug Regimen Reviews) failed to identify the error. These circumstances posed Immediate Jeopardy to resident health and safety. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 7/19/24 at 4:15 PM which began on 4/23/24. The facility took the appropriate action to remove the Immediate Jeopardy on 7/20/24 at 8:29 AM by taking these steps: 1. Put a new process in place for new orders to be double checked by a 2nd nurse. 2. Ensuring newly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to follow a resident's Care Plan for transfers and to assess a resident immediately after a fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #6). The resident required a mechanical lift with the assistance of 2 staff for transfers. The facility failed to provide assistance of 2 while the resident was transferred in the shower room which resulted in the resident sliding out of the mechanical lift sling. The facility further failed to conduct an assessment of the resident prior to getting her up from the shower room floor. The facility reported a census of 74 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #6 dated 5/23/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 which indicated intact cognition. Diagnoses included other acute paralytic poliomyelitis (polio, disease of motor neurons of the spinal cord and brain), repeated falls, and fracture (vertebra). The MDS documented the resident used a wheelchair for mobility and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility investigation report, and staff interviews, the facility failed to supervise 1 of 6 residents reviewed in order to prevent a fall with injury (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/14/2023 revealed Resident #4 had severely impaired cognitive abilities, required extensive assistance to transfer from one surface to another, and had a fall that resulted in a major injury. The resident had diagnoses including weakness, depression, and dementia. Resident #4's Care Plan identified she had a a risk for falls due to confusion, deconditioning, gait/balance problems, incontinence, poor communication, unaware of safety needs, and history of syncope initiated on 10/18/2019. The Care Plan directed staff to provide assistance with all transfers and ambulation initiated on 12/12/2023. The Care Plan identified the resident had an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interview the facility failed to administer the restorative program as recommended by the therapy department for one of three residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 71 residents.Findings include:The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment tool dated 2/19/2026 revealed Resident #2 had intact cognition, required partial to moderate assistance with dressing and hygiene, and was dependent on staff to ambulate and transfer from one surface to another. The MDS reported the resident's nutritional approaches included a feeding tube and altered diet, and received no therapy services including restorative service during the prior seven days.The resident's Care Plan revealed the resident had an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit focus area initiated on 8/22/25, and a risk for falls focus area initiated on 8/28/2025. The Intervention dated 8/28/25 directed staff to encourage the resident to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for strengthening and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident interviews the facility failed to consistently answer call lights in a timely manner for 3 of 3 residents reviewed, (Residents #4, #5 and #6). The facility reported a census of 77 residents. Findings include:1.The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/3/2026 revealed Resident #4 had an intact cognitive status. Observation on 3/10/2026 at 2:35 p.m. revealed the resident seated at the dining room table with her walker nearby. During an interview, the resident reported call light response times takes awhile, greater than fifteen minutes. The resident also puts her call light on for her roommate who is not capable of calling for assistance. 2.The MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had intact cognitive status.Observation on 3/10/2026 at 2:40 p.m. revealed the resident in bed, alert and watching television. The resident reported he required assistance of two staff to transfer in and out of bed and use the bathroom. He stated staff failed to answer his call light in a timely manner at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1 and Resident #4) when Resident #1 received Resident #2's insulin injection and was transferred to the emergency room (ER) for close observation, and Resident #4 received Resident #8's morning medications and required monitoring of his blood pressure (BP) every shift for the following 72 hours. The facility reported a census of 77 residents. Findings include: 1.A Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented diagnoses for Resident #1 included acute kidney failure, Type 2 diabetes and schizophrenia. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) documented a score of 15 out of 15 which revealed intact cognition.A Medication Error Wrong Medication Incident Report dated 12/5/25 at 8:25 a.m., revealed Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (Agency nurse) documented the following:While administering morning insulins, Resident #1 received the wrong insulin. (Staff A)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, manufacturer's product manuals, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized the correct full body mechanical lift sling size, resulting in 1 of 3 residents utilizing a mechanical lift to slide in the sling, and be lowered to the floor (Resident #3). The facility identified a census of 79 residents.Findings include:Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 15/15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #3 exhibited upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand) and lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot) functional impairments on both sides of the body and utilized a wheelchair.Resident #3 was not able to do sit to stand (ability to come to a standing position from a sitting in a chair, wheelchair or on the side of the bed) due to medical condition/safety concerns and was dependent upon staff for chair/bed to chair transfers. The MDS listed diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to respond in a respectful manner to a resident (Resident #7) who requested help to find a bathroom for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility also failed to protect residents' right to privacy when electronic health information was left visible and unattended on a computer in 2 of the 4 hallways observed. The facility reported a census of 87 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 scored 13 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #7's MDS had the following diagnoses listed, in part: Alzheimer's disease, Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA or stroke), and cancer. The MDS identified that Resident #7 had a history of falling within the past month and required a partial to moderate amount of staff assistance for toilet transferring and toileting hygiene.Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to answer call lights within 15 minutes to meet resident needs for 7 of 9 residents reviewed (Residents #13, #28, #53, #55, #58, #60, #81). The facility reported a census of 85 residents.Findings include: 1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #53 dated 7/28/25 listed diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness/loss of movement on one side of the body), urinary tract infection in the past 30 days, and cerebral infarction (stroke). The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicated intact cognition with a score of 13/15. Section GG indicated the resident required assistance with self care due to functional limitations that interfered with daily function on one side of his upper body and both sides of his lower body. The Care Plan (CP) for Resident #53 with an admission date of 7/22/25 documented activities of daily living self care deficits and directed staff to encourage the resident to use the bell to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, and policy review dietary staff failed to properly wear hair restraints while preparing and serving food during 3 of 3 observations. The facility reported a census of 85 residents.Findings include: During lunch observations on 8/11/2025 at 12:44 PM dietary staff were serving food from the steam table parked outside of the kitchen door. Staff E, [NAME] was wearing a hair net that did not cover the sides of her hair or approximately 2-3 inches of her bangs. She plated and served food. Staff C, Food Service Manager (FSM) was wearing a ball cap. Her hair was in a bun under the back of the cap. The bun and approximately 1-2 inches of hair below the bun were not in a hair net. On 8/12/2025 at 7:18 AM the Dietary Manager was wearing a ball cap with her hair in a bun. She was not wearing a hair net. At 7:31 AM observed Staff F, [NAME] left the kitchen pushing the steam table down the hall to another dining room. Her hairnet did not cover the back 2 inches of her hair. Between 7:38 AM and 7:55 AM Staff F leaned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents. The facility failed to adequately clean toilets and keep them in good repair, ensure beds were made in a timely manner, and to repair damaged or missing window screens. The facility reported a census of 85 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #85 dated 7/10/25 listed diagnoses of cancer, non-Alzheimer's dementia, hip fracture, and dependence on a wheelchair. His Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 5/15 indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Care Plan (CP) for Resident #85 revised 10/23/24 indicated the resident had self care deficits and required the assistance of 1 staff with toileting before and after meals. The care plan documented a risk for falls, with interventions that included therapy evaluation 7/11/25, a toileting program at 7:00 am as of 7/23/25, non-slip footwear, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect, and to provide care in a dignified manner for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for dignity (Residents #58, #85, #93). Facility staff failed to maintain a resident's wheelchair in a clean and sanitary manner, staff used an expletive when describing a resident's behavior in front of others, and the facility posted signs in a resident's room regarding toileting without consulting them. The facility reported a census of 85 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #85 dated 7/10/25 listed diagnoses of cancer, non-Alzheimer's dementia, hip fracture, and dependence on a wheelchair. His Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 5/15 indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Care Plan (CP) for Resident #85 revised 10/23/24 indicated the resident had limited physical mobility and ambulated with a wheelchair in the hallway. The CP listed a goal to prevent complications related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 Version 1.18.11 last updated October 2023 (RAI), and staff interview the facility failed to submit the Minimum Data Set (MDS) within the required time frame for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for timely submission. The facility reported a census of 85 residents. Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident #92 showed a quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. The resident had an annual MDS dated [DATE]. Both assessments had a status of complete, not accepted. During an interview on 08/13/2025 at 10:31 AM, the MDS coordinator explained the quarterly dated 6/20/25 was flagged as do not submit. She further explained it should have been submitted. She continued, it was discovered the quarterly should have been an annual and the annual assessment was completed. That assessment too was flagged as do not submit and it should have been submitted. During an interview on 8/13/25 at 4:45 PM the MDS coordinator explained they do not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff obtained and/or administered medications per physician order and professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents sampled (Resident #7) with a resident reported medication error by staff. The facility reported a census of 85 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #7, dated 6/5/25, revealed diagnoses of end stage renal disease and systemic Lupus (an autoimmune disease). The MDS identified the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 out of 15 (indicative of a mild cognitive impairment). The MDS identified the resident received renal dialysis. The Care Plan for Resident #7, last revised 8/1/25, revealed the resident took a sedative/hypnotic for insomnia. On 8/13/2025 at 8:09 AM, Resident #7 reported concerns with nursing staff medication administration for two different medications. Resident #7 explained that she had been taking Zolpidem (Ambien) to treat insomnia for the last 15 years.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for activities(Resident #81). The facility reported a census of 85 residents. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/23/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #81 which included anxiety, depression, and weakness. The MDS stated it was very important for the resident to go outside when the weather was good. The MDS listed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The facility policy Activities, dated 3/27/25, stated the facility would provide an ongoing program to support the resident in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. A 4/23/25 Resident Preferences Evaluation stated it was very important to the resident to go outside to get fresh air when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clincal record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to complete an assessment for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #96) reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility reported a census of 85 residents. Findings include: Progress Notes written on 6/3/25 at 4:28 PM document Resident #96 readmitted to the facility following cholecystitis (inflammation of the gallbladder), sepsis (sepsis happens when an infection you already have triggers a chain reaction throughout the body. It is a life threatening, medical emergency per the Center for Disease Control (CDC)), and septic shock (a severe form of sepsis characterized by dangerously low blood pressure and abnormalities in cellular and metabolic function). The clinical record lacked a physical assessment or vital signs on 6/3 and 6/4. The pre-dialysis assessment completed on 6/5 included vitals of Temperature 97.2 Fahrenheit (F), Pulse 88, Respirations 16, Blood Pressure (BP) 96/56 and oxygen saturation (O2 Sat) of 88%. The post-dialysis assessment completed on 6/5 included vitals of Temperature 98.7 F, Pulse 80,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to utilize foot pedals during wheelchair transport in order to ensure safety and failed to ensure good working order of a walker to prevent falls for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Residents #12, #49, and #101). The facility reported a census of 85 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 6/18/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #12 which included non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, and cancer. The MDS stated the resident was dependent on staff to propel her wheelchair and listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 12 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. On 8/11/25 at approximately 11:00 a.m., Staff A Hospice Tech pushed Resident #12 in her wheelchair from the nursing station to her room, a distance of approximately 50 feet. The resident's feet were not placed on foot pedals and the bottoms of her feet lightly touched the ground while Staff A pushed her. On 8/13/25 at 4:38 p.m., the Director of Nursing(DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy/protocol, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with symptoms of a potential urinary tract infection (UTI) received prompt testing and ongoing assessment to prevent worsening of symptoms for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #17) with a complaint of a possible UTI. The facility reported a census of 85.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #17, dated 5/22/25, identified diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 (indicative of mild cognitive impairment).The Care Plan for Resident #17, last revised 7/30/25, included a focus area of bladder incontinence and the following intervention: Monitor/document for s/sx (signs/symptoms) UTI: pain, burning, blood tinged urine, cloudiness, no output, deepening of urine color, increased pulse, increased temp, urinary frequency, foul smelling urine, fever, chills, altered mental status, change in behavior, change in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed facility policy and physician orders regarding checking for enteral feeding tube placement, checking for residual gastric volume, and flushing with the correct amount of fluid prior to administering an enteral feeding to 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #4) with an gastric feeding tube. The facility reported a census of 85.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/14/25, identified Resident #4 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The MDS identified the resident received nutrition enterally (through a feeding tube) and had a severe cognitive impairment. The Care Plan for Resident #4, last revised 5/22/25, identified the resident had an order for nothing by mouth (NPO) and required feeding, medication, and hydration through a gastric feeding tube (G-Tube). The Care Plan included an intervention for staff to check for tube placement and gastric contents/residual volume. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic health record (EHR) review, clinical record review, facility records, resident, physician and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident understood the Alternative Dispute Resolution before signing the agreement for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #104) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include:During the Entrance Conference on 8/11/25, The Administrator revealed the facility offered Alternative Dispute Resolution agreements to residents. Staff X, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Admissions & Marketing Coordinator was responsible for explaining and reviewing the paperwork with the resident and/or the resident's legal representative. The History & Physical (H&P) dated 7/26/25 provided by the facility documented Resident #104 had dementia with major neurocognitive disorder.The Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screening dated 7/29/25 provided by the facility documented the Level I screen showed Resident #104 to have evidence of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection prevention policies including enhanced barrier precautions for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #4, #6, and #58) who required the use of enhanced barrier precautions and for the staffs' lack of knowledge in the handling of soiled linens. The facility reported a census of 85. 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/14/25, identified Resident #4 had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The MDS identified the resident received nutrition enterally (through a feeding tube) and had a severe cognitive impairment. The Care Plan for Resident #4, last revised 5/22/25, identified the resident had an order for nothing by mouth (NPO) and required feeding, medication and hydration through a gastric feeding tube (G-Tube). The Care Plan included a focus on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) which included interventions of wearing a gown and gloves for all high contact activities. The Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, policy review, and observations the facility failed to keep the facility in a clean, homelike manner. The facility reported a census of 73 residents. Findings include: Observation on 3/11/25 at 1:00 pm revealed the following: a. 5 of 9 resident rooms on Hall A noted to have window curtains that are falling down, not attached to the curtain rods. b. 3 of 7 resident rooms on Hall C noted to have window curtains that are falling down, not attached to the curtain rods. c. 2 of 11 residents rooms on Hall D do not have window curtains or rods but have a white sheet covering the entire window. 6 of 11 resident rooms noted to have window curtains that are falling down, not attached to the curtain rod. Room D-12 does not have any window covering. Observation on 3/11/25 at 1:00 pm revealed the following: a. 9 of 9 resident rooms on Hall A exterior windows are dirty, noted to have dust and grime covering the exterior window. b. 4 of 7 resident rooms on Hall C exterior windows are dirty, noted to have dust and grime covering the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to treat 1 out of 3 residents reviewed with respect and dignity (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 73 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool dated 1/23/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #7 which included history of traumatic brain injury and non Alzheimer's dementia. The MDS stated the resident required extensive to total assist of staff for toileting, hygiene, showering, and personal hygiene. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 5 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Progress Note dated 1/21/2025 at 2:25 PM revealed a follow up with Resident #7 about physical abuse incident. He denies feeling unsafe or scared for his safety. Review of the summary of Allegation of Abuse document revealed on 1/15/25 at 9:55 AM Staff C, CNA struck Resident #7 on the back of the head. The swat to the head had enough force that it caused his chin to go forward towards his chest. On 3/10/25 2:41…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections during dining and during wound care for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #16 and #52). The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation 9/17/24, from 12:11 PM to 12:45 PM, in the main dining hall, Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), assisted three residents with cutting up food on their plates, two residents at one table, one at another table, assisted two with their first bites, touched their dessert cup with fingers on the inside of the cup. Staff I did not sanitize hands in between residents. Staff I continued to move back and forth between two residents at one table with giving them bites of their food without sanitizing hands in between residents. Staff I then went to another table and assisted another resident with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, family interview, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure resident dignity for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #16 & #52). The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #52 dated 6/27/24 documented diagnoses that included dementia, anxiety, and depression. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment was coded, not completed resident rarely/never understood. The Care Plan focus and intervention initiated 1/11/23 documented self-care performance deficits related to activity intolerance, aggressive behavior, confusion, dementia, fatigue, limited mobility. Resident #52 was totally dependent on two staff for dressing. In an interview on 9/18/24 at 10:30 AM Resident #52's responsible party relayed they had reported on two occasions staff brought Resident #52 into the main dining room without pants and only a blanket, Resident would be mortified to know he was exposed. They…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, family interview, staff interview, clinical record and documents review the facility failed to include resident in decision making, denied resident right to be informed and choose options affecting care for 1 of 6 resident reviewed for choices (Resident #19). The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #19 dated 6/26/24 revealed diagnoses, End stage renal disease (ESRD), anxiety and depression. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment scored 15 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The care plan focus initiated 5/1/24 for Resident #19 directed staff to discuss with resident any concerns related to loss of independence, decline in function. Interventions also included resident teaching should include disease progression. Additional focus area initiated 3/8/24 revealed resident is independent for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical and social needs. A Durable Power of Healthcare document dated 7/31/12 for Resident #19 documented allows family member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to fully review and revise the comprehensive Care Plan for 1 of 5 residents who were sampled for Care Plan review (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #5, dated 8/29/24, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further documented diagnoses to include medically complex conditions, cancer, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, and depression. The MDS further revealed the resident was taking an antidepressant medication. A review of the electronic health record (EHR) for Resident #5 revealed an order for Remeron Oral Tablet 15 milligram (MG) (Mirtazapine) to be given by mouth at bedtime for depression, ordered on 4/11/24. The EHR for Resident #5 revealed diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder, Depression, unspecified, and Anxiety Disorder, unspecified. The Care Plan for Resident #5, with a revision date of 9/11/24, did not include a focus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review the facility failed to follow the diet order for 1 of 3 residents reviewed on therapeutic diet (Resident #19). The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #19 dated 6/26/24 revealed a therapeutic diet ordered. Diagnoses included End state Renal Disease (ESRD). A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment scored 15 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The Care Plan focus initiated 3/5/24 documented nutrition risk related to ESRD on dialysis, food intolerances, and therapeutic diet. Direct staff to serve diet as ordered. Documented double servings eggs, cereal at breakfast that was added on 4/3/24. In an interview and observation on 9/17/24 at 12:59 PM Resident #19 revealed his lunch plate, over half the plate full of food. Resident relayed he could not eat this, the meat was terrible, couldn't eat the meal other than a few bites. Relayed sauerkraut was awful and having that on the plate made it all taste bad. Relayed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and dialysis transfer agreement the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis assessments were completed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #19). The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #19 dated 6/26/24 revealed a diagnosis of End stage renal disease (ESRD). A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment scored 15 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The Care Plan focus initiated 3/1/24 documented, Resident #19 needed hemodialysis related to renal failure, scheduled weekly on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, documented the resident would have immediate intervention should any signs or symptoms of complications from dialysis occur. On 09/16/24 at 02:29 PM, Resident #19 confirmed long term dialysis and history of health complications resulted in nursing home placement this year, could not recall a pattern of assessments completed relating to dialysis appointments. A Clinical record review on 9/17/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to complete a quarterly assessment in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 74 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #2 dated 4/25/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and included diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in tissue), sepsis, and congestive heart failure. Section GG documented the resident used a walker or wheelchair for mobility and required set up or clean up assistance with sit to stand, chair to bed/bed to chair transfers, and toilet transfers. The electronic health record (EHR) for Resident #2 documented MDS assessments completed for discharge with anticipated return on 7/10/24 and entry back to the facility 7/11/24. The EHR showed a quarterly assessment due date of 7/26/24 with a complete by date of 8/9/24. At the time of this review that assessment due date was highlighted red and indicated it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation; clinical record review; a written grievance; and staff, resident, and family interviews the facility failed to provide consistent restorative cares to prevent decline in mobility and/or range of motion for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #2, #3). The facility reported a census of 77 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 5/31/24 documented diagnoses of hemiplegia following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left side, weakness, and arthritis. MDS Section C documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12/15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG documented the resident required a walker or wheelchair for mobility, needed substantial to maximal assistance with bed mobility, and was dependent on 2 or more helpers for sit to stand and transfers. The resident did not have a history of using a mechanical lift. Resident #1 ' s care plan revealed a focus area dated 5/24/24 which documented an ADL self care deficit related to limited range of motion and limited mobility. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-21 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure providers reviewed medications and associated diagnoses for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #2). During 3 visits in June 2024, including a medication review, the provider did not find the medication error The facility reported a census of 77. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #2 dated 4/25/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and included diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in tissue), sepsis, and congestive heart failure. It did not include a diagnosis of diabetes. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented Resident #2 received 77 doses of Glimepiride Tablet 2 MG for diabetes between 4/24/24 and 7/11/24. Progress notes dated from 3/17/24 through 7/15/24 labeled Order Note lacked orders for the Glimepiride entered into the MAR. A document titled Order Details from the EHR documented the order was entered and confirmed by Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure pharmacy consultants reviewed medications and associated diagnoses for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #2). During 3 separate monthly drug regimen reviews the pharmacy consultant failed to find the diabetic medication error for the resident. The facility reported a census of 77. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #2 dated 4/25/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and included diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in tissue), sepsis, and congestive heart failure. It did not include a diagnosis of diabetes. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented Resident #2 received 77 doses of Glimepiride Tablet 2 MG for diabetes between 4/24/24 and 7/11/24. Progress notes dated from 3/17/24 through 7/15/24 labeled Order Note lacked orders for the glimepiride entered into the MAR. Progress notes labeled Pharmacy Note indicated the resident ' s medications were reviewed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide 4 of 5 resident's reviewed with 2 baths weekly (Residents # 3, #4, #5, #6). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/14/2023, Resident #3 had diagnoses which included dementia and cerebrovascular insufficiency, and had severely impaired cognitive ability. The resident's Care Plan indicated the resident transferred with the assistance of two staff and a mechanical lift. Staff were instructed to wash what the resident could not do for herself. Review of the December, 2023 bath record revealed the resident received two baths during the month from December 1 - December 31, 2023. 2. According to the MDS dated [DATE], Resident #4 had severely impaired cognitive ability, required staff assistance to transfer and ambulate, and had diagnoses including dementia, weakness, and depression. The resident's Care Plan directed staff to provide a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, policy review, and observations, the facility failed to provide appropriate assessments and interventions for 4 of 6 residents reviewed with impaired skin and a change of condition (Residents #1, #6, #8, #9). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #1 had diagnoses which included heart disease, Covid related weakness, and Alzheimer's. The MDS revealed the resident required assistance of 1 staff for transfers, dressing, bathing, and hygiene. The resident utilized a wheelchair and walker to move about the facility. The Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognitive ability. Review of the initial Care Plan dated 1/31/24 indicated Resident #1 was at risk for skin breakdown related to bladder incontinence. The plan directed the staff to provide medications, treatments and dressings as ordered by the physician.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow the resident's Care Plan for 1 of 11 residents reviewed (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set), an assessment tool, dated 1/4/2024, revealed Resident #6 had impaired cognitive abilities with long and short term memory impairment. The resident was dependent on staff to transfer from one surface to another, had one stage two pressure ulcer and incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident had diagnoses including dementia and depressive disorder. The resident's Care Plan identified the resident had a risk for pressure sore development related to immobility initiated 7/13/2023. On 11/16/2023 the Care Plan indicated a stage II coccyx wound healed. The Care Plan directed staff to assist resident to shift weight in wheel chair every 15 minutes, educate resident/family/caregivers as to causes of skin breakdown including: transfer/positioning requirements; importance of taking care during ambulating/mobility, good nutrition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, policy review and observations, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1, #6, #9). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #1 had diagnoses which included heart disease, Covid related weakness, and Alzheimer's. The MDS revealed the resident required assistance of 1 staff for transfers, dressing, bathing, and hygiene. The resident utilized a wheelchair and walker to move about the facility. The Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident had intact cognitive ability. Review of the initial Care Plan dated 1/31/24 indicated Resident #1 was at risk for skin breakdown related to bladder incontinence. The plan directed the staff to provide medications, treatments, and dressings as ordered by the physician. Review of the unsigned Resident admission assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #46's MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified a BIMS score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impact. The MDS included diagnoses of medically complex conditions, renal insufficiency (inadequate kidney function), Alzheimer's disease and traumatic brain injury. The Care Plan Focus revised 9/20/23 indicated that Resident #46 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to Alzheimer's, confusion, dementia, fatigue, shortness of breath, stroke, and traumatic brain injury. On 10/10/23 at 1:05 PM observed Resident #46 in the hallway outside of his room without pants or underwear on, sitting in his wheelchair. Resident #46's private area was visibly exposed. Resident #46 asked Staff E, Housekeeper, to get him assistance. Resident #46's roommate and two other residents noted in the hallway at the time. Resident #46 remained exposed in the hallway without pants or underwear on for approximately six minutes. On 10/10/23 at 1:10 PM, Staff E indicated Resident #46 yelled out for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions for 2 of 2 kitchen observations that included sanitizer buckets, expired food items, and a dishwasher in disrepair. Observations of staff clothing touching the pureed food containers during the puree and reheat processes which impacted 3 of 3 residents. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. The initial kitchen observation and tour with the Food Services Supervisor (FSS) on 10/9/23 revealed the following: A. At 10:37 AM two red sanitizer buckets for food preparation surfaces were empty and dry while noodles, chicken, sauce, and vegetables were prepared. Observation included utensils for foods placed on multiple surfaces and one bucket moved from the dirty dish side of the kitchen to the clean side of the kitchen and set on the counter to be filled without being wiped down. B. At 10:42 AM the dishwasher wash cycle temperature read 162.6 degrees. The rinse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the physician and family when a resident required the Heimlich maneuver for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #39). Findings include: A review of the clinical medical records on 10/10/23 at 3:40 PM, documented on 9/11/23 at 8:00 AM in the nurse's notes Resident #39 had the Heimlich maneuver done three times by the nurse. Resident #39's clinical record lacked notification to the physician and family regarding the Heimlich maneuver. On 10/11/23 at 8:15 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) reported that the physician and family did not get notified due to the nurse who did the Heimlich maneuver reported Resident #39 had been coughing. The DON educated the nurse on if a resident is coughing then the resident should not have the Heimlich done. When clarifying with the DON, she reported the facility should notify the physician and family when the Heimlich maneuver is done on a resident.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a clean, safe and comfortable environment for the residents. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: An observation on starting on 10/10/23 at 10:48 AM revealed a missing air vent grill on Room B4 and CR20 room air conditioners. Witnessed the shower rooms propped open with buckets. Missing and broken tile in hallway B shower room. The white caulk on the base of the shower appeared to have most of it covered in a black buildup of dirt and grim. During a walkthrough of the laundry room on 10/11/23 at 10:00 AM revealed an unattached baseboard next to the washing machine lying on the floor. Noted duct tape used to put the baseboard up, but the duct tape hung on the base of the wall. On 10/11/23 at 3:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported that she did know about the air conditioner missing a part or the concerns in the Hallway B shower room, but, she would look into getting them fixed.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to report a resident to resident altercation to the Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals (DIA) for 1 of 1 residents sampled for a resident to resident altercation (Resident #41). Findings include: 1. Resident #41's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated that Resident #41 did not have any behavioral symptoms during the look back period. The MDS included diagnoses of anxiety, depression, chronic pain syndrome. Resident #41's Care Plan initiated 2/3/21 documented that she had depression. The Goal indicated that Resident #41 would remain free of symptoms of depression, anxiety, or sad mood through the review date (12/20/23). The Intervention dated 2/3/21 directed the staff to monitor, document, and report fi she experiences a sense of hopelessness, helplessness, and/or safety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for 1 of 1 residents sampled for a resident to resident altercation (Resident #41). Findings include: 1. Resident #41's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated that Resident #41 did not have any behavioral symptoms during the look back period. The MDS included diagnoses of anxiety, depression, chronic pain syndrome. Resident #41's Care Plan initiated 2/3/21 documented that she had depression. The Goal indicated that Resident #41 would remain free of symptoms of depression, anxiety, or sad mood through the review date (12/20/23). The Intervention dated 2/3/21 directed the staff to monitor, document, and report fi she experiences a sense of hopelessness, helplessness, and/or safety awareness. Then report to the Medical Director (MD) if Resident #41 felt…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately complete a comprehensive Care Plan for 1 of 15 residents reviewed (Resident #39). Findings include: On 10/9/23 at 5:09 PM, Resident #39's daughter reported that she had to remind the staff to put the continuous positive airway pressure machine (CPAP, machine to help treat sleep apnea) on her mother at night. The Care Plan lacked documentation of the use of a CPAP machine for Resident #39. On 10/11/23 at 8:10 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) reported Resident #39's Care Plan should include her use of a CPAP and did not know how it got was missed.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interviews the facility failed to weigh a resident weekly as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #14). Findings include: Resident #14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included diagnoses of anemia (low iron in the blood), peripheral vascular disease (narrowing of blood vessels outside of the heart or brain), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD, stomach acid repeatedly flows into the esophagus). The assessment lacked a current weight and listed weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or a loss of 10% or more the last six months as no or unknown. The Physician's Orders sheet signed by the physician on 8/8/23 listed an order dated 5/18/23 to check weekly weights. The Care Plan failed to address weekly weights as ordered by the physician beginning 5/18/23 and alternate options for declined nutritional supplements. The Nutritional Risk Assessment in the electronic health record (EHR), effective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident #37's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of arthritis, traumatic brain injury, and anxiety. Resident #37 required extensive assistance from two persons for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toilet use, with an extensive assistance from one person for eating and personal hygiene. The Care Plan Focus revised 9/20/23 documented that Resident #37 required assistance meeting his emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs related to cognitive deficits. The Intervention dated 11/21/22 indicated that Resident #37 needed assistance/escort to activity functions. The Care Plan Focus revised 9/20/23 documented that Resident #37 had impaired physical mobility related to Alzheimer's, contractures, disease process, rheumatoid arthritis, subdural hematoma (bleeding on a part of the brain), and weakness. Interventions included staff and resident propelled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interviews the facility failed to a comprehensive assessment of a resident's nutritional needs for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #14) for nutrition. Findings include: Resident #14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included diagnoses of anemia (low iron in the blood), peripheral vascular disease (narrowing of blood vessels outside of the heart or brain), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD, stomach acid repeatedly flows into the esophagus). The assessment lacked a current weight and listed weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or a loss of 10% or more the last six months as no or unknown. Resident #14's previous MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented a weight of 95 pounds. The assessment indicated that Resident #14 had a weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or a loss of 10% or more the last six months, not on physician prescribed weight loss regimen. On 10/10/23 at 8:15 AM Resident #14 reported that she is losing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to secure a level 4 controlled drug, lorazepam concentrated liquid (anti-anxiety medication), that required refrigeration in a locked medication refrigerator for 2 of 2 mediation refrigerators in the facility. Schedule II-V controlled medications have a potential for abuse and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: On 10/9/23 at 2:44 PM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), opened the unlocked fridge in the medication room on the CR Unit (rehabilitation unit), revealing three bottles of liquid lorazepam in the refrigerator. The refrigerator was not locked. The medication room was locked. Staff A verified that the Lorazepam should be double locked. On 10/10/23 at 9:27 AM, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN), opened the unlocked refrigerator in the front nurse's station medication room. The refrigerator had a padlock on the door of the refrigerator but the second part to the lock that should have been fastened to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility policy review, staff, and resident interviews, the facility failed to implement prevention practices to decrease the risk of infection for 2 of 8 the residents reviewed (Resident #39 and Resident #26). The facility failed to clean Resident #39's machine used to breathe at night. The nurse failed to wear gloves while giving Resident #26, his insulin. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Finding included: 1. Resident #39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Resident #39 required extensive assistance from two persons with toilet use and limited assistance from one person with personal hygiene. On 10/9/23 at 5:09 PM Resident #39's daughter reported that the facility never cleaned her mother's continuous positive airway pressure machine (CPAP). Review of Resident #39's electronic and paper clinical health records lacked documentation of cleaning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-19 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman for 1 of 3 residents who transferred to the hospital (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's computer software program used for electronic medical record documentation revealed Resident #5 had discharged from the facility on 5/4/24, and hospitalized until they reentered the facility on 5/7/24. The clinical record lacked documentation of notification to the LTC Ombudsman Resident #5 had discharged to the hospital as required by federal regulation. During an interview 9/18/24 at 4:18 PM, the Administrator advised the LTC Ombudsman was not notified of Resident #5's transfer to the hospital in May of 2024. The Administrator stated an expectation the facility notify the LTC Ombudsman when a resident transfers to the hospital. The Administrator advised the facility does not have a policy with regard to notification to the Ombudsman, they follow regulations.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-19 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative of the facility policy for bed hold, including reserve bed payment, for 1 of 3 residents who were reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's computer software program used for electronic medical record documentation revealed Resident #5 discharged from the facility on 4/4/24, and hospitalized until they reentered the facility on 4/6/24. In addition, the resident discharged from the facility on 5/4/24, and hospitalized until they reentered the facility on 5/7/24. The clinical record lacked documentation, either in writing or verbally, of notification to the resident or the resident's responsible party of the facility policy for bed hold, including reserve bed payment, when Resident #5 discharged and transferred to the hospital on 4/4/24 and on 5/4/24, with an anticipated return. During an interview 9/18/24 at 4:18 PM, the Administrator acknowledged a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-10-12 · tag F0640 — widespread
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record view and staff interview, the facility failed to transmit 73 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for facility within the required timeframe. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: The review of Resident #39's MDS assessment dated [DATE] lacked a transmission date. The review of Resident #24's MDS assessments lacked transmission dates for the completion dates of 8/24/23 and 9/12/23. On 10/10/23 at 1:59 PM, the MDS Coordinator reported they complete an MDS for an entry, admission, signification changes, skilled, discharge, quarterly assessments, and annual assessments. She reported that no transmissions of MDS' have occurred for the facility since a prior employee transmitted the MDS assessments. They added that no one at the time had access to transmit the MDS. She reported that she has worked on getting access to transmit the MDS assessments that are overdue. She reported that the prior employee quit working back in the middle of August 2023. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$38,787 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $38,787 — penalty dated 2024-07-21
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-13 for 13 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GLENN, DOVIDIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
LABKOVSKY, ISAACIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
NEIMAN, MOSHEIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
EMY HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
MILLENNIUM REHAB & CONSULTING INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
BELLINGER, LORIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/22/2024
GOLDBERG, NATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
INSEL, DOVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
YOUNGER, CLETEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2013
BRESSLER, YEHOSHUAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/17/2025
ROSE, NATHANIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/17/2025
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
NORTHBROOK REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$319K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 2%Other / private 42%

This home reported $319K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$289per resident / day
operating cost
$8,790per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$265per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165587. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next