Golden Age Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 36.0 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-10-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review and the facility policy review the facility failed to keep all medications in a locked medication cart, inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #1 entered the facility on 7/22/22. The MDS also documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 09 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, diabetes, and depression. Review of Resident #1 physician orders revealed Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (pain medication) tablet 5-325 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for pain dated 9/5/24. The Care Plan for Resident #1 documented a focus area for pain related to history of back and leg pain at times and usually takes medication at bedtime, date Initiated 11/10/22.Review of document titled Controlled Drug Receipt/Record Disposition Form for Resident #1 for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to offer the pneumococcal vaccine to 4 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents #4, #5, 26 and #27). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. On 7/31/2025 at 8:49AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported she had been in her role as the DON and Infection Preventionist (IP) since May 2023. The DON reported they should check the immunization status of residents upon admission and residents should be offered immunizations at that time. The DON reported she followed the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for offering residents the pneumococcal vaccine. The DON reported being aware that there were residents eligible for the vaccine who had not been offered. The DON explained the facility's pharmacy representative just did an audit related to vaccines to determine which residents were in need of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure thorough documentation of an assessment of a resident's ability to self-administer insulin (an injectable medication used to lower blood sugar) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for medication self-administration (Resident #35). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 5/6/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #35 which included diabetes, hypertension, and Parkinson's disease (a disease that caused difficulty with mobility). The MDS stated the resident took insulin and listed his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 7/31/25 at 12:34 p.m., via phone, Staff H Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated she drew up the resident's insulin and she handed it to him or the Certified Medical Assistant (CMA) sat it on his table. She stated the resident refused to have certain staff administer his insulin so they started doing this recently. On 7/31/25 at 12:43 p.m., the Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve concerns for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for grievances (Resident #34). The facility reported a census of 34 residents. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 5/6/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #35 which included diabetes, hypertension, and Parkinson's disease (a disease that caused difficulty with mobility). The MDS stated the resident received insulin (an injectable medication used to lower blood sugars) and listed his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The facility Resident Grievance Policy revised 3/31/23, stated the facility had a grievance system to resolve issues and respond to grievances as soon as possible. On 7/28/25 at 2:19 p.m., Resident #35 stated he had to sit in his own waste frequently and stated last Sunday (7/27/25), he had to sit in waste for 4-5 hours before anyone changed him. He stated this was humiliating. He stated 3 weeks ago on a Sunday the staff did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out interventions and ordered treatments to treat a pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #45). The facility reported a census of 45 residents.Findings include:The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers:Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues.Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister.Stage III Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed. Slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. May include undermining and tunneling.Stage IV is full thickness tissue…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 6 residents (Resident #35) reviewed for medications was free of a significant medication error due to the omission of insulin (an injectable medication used to lower blood sugar). The facility reported a census of 40 residents. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 5/6/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #35 which included diabetes, hypertension, and Parkinson's disease (a disease that causes difficulty with mobility). The MDS stated the resident took insulin and listed his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. A 12/5/24 Care Plan entry stated the resident had diabetes and was dependent on insulin. The undated facility policy Recording of Physician Orders directed staff to ensure physician orders were accurate and to avoid medication errors. On 7/28/25 at 2:19 p.m., Resident #34 stated 3 weeks ago on a Sunday the staff did not check his blood sugar or give him insulin. The May and July 2025 Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide a proper functioning call system to ensure resident timely access to staff for 2 of 16 residents reviewed (Resident #3, Resident #22). The facility reported a census of 40. Findings include: 1) The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #3 listed diagnoses to include traumatic brain injury, heart disease, renal insufficiency, neurogenic bladder, urinary tract infection, anxiety chronic pain, reduced mobility. The resident was coded to need substantial/maximus assistance with transferring from bed or chair, or to the toilet. The MDS section for Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) scored 13 out of 15 indicated intact cognitive function. The Care Plan initiated 3/25/24 for Resident #3 documented impaired balance, assistance of two staff with stand lift, noted to put on call light to use bed side commode or to be changed. 2) The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #22 listed diagnoses to include…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff and resident interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide restorative activity as planned for 1 of 1 resident reviewed. (Resident #3) The facility reported census was 38. Findings include: According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 2/3/25, Resident #3 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating an intact cognitive status. Resident #3 required moderate assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #3 was coded as having a catheter and occasional incontinent bowel functioning. Resident #3's diagnosis included atrial fibrillation, renal insufficiency, neurogenic bladder, and diabetes mellitus. According to the Nursing Restorative Care Program from January 28, 2025 through March 14, 2025, Resident #3 has the following restorative tasks which all are to be performed 3-6 times per week: 1. Active range of motion to both upper extremities: trunk flex pulling/pushing tabletop therabar 1x15 reps seated rows across the blue bands 1x15 reps. 2. 2# ankle weights: ankle pumps…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents are appropriately assessed and provided interventions to maintain their optimal health and well-being for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #3) The facility reported census was 38. Findings include: According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 2/3/25, Resident #3 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating an intact cognitive status. Resident #3 required moderate assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #3 was coded as having a catheter and occasional incontinent bowel functioning. Resident #3's diagnosis included atrial fibrillation, renal insufficiency, neurogenic bladder, diabetes mellitus. According to a Progress Note dated 1/26/25 at 7:07 a.m. written by Staff G, Registered Nurse, Resident #3 was agitated and complaining of a sore groin and peri area. Staff G indicated the area was reddened and tender to touch. Staff G stated she would check on getting something, but noted doctors do not come in on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, family interview and provider interview, the facility failed to notify a physician and family representative upon discovery of a blistered area on a resident's left foot. (Resident #1) The facility reported census was 38. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 5/3/24, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating an intact cognitive status. Resident #1 required dependent to maximal assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs and was frequently incontinent of bladder and occasionally incontinent of bowel. Diagnosis included lymphedema, congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity. Clinical record review found on a 7/3/24 skin assessment, a new blister was identified on the left foot of Resident #1 measuring 6 centimeters (cm) long by 3.5 cm wide. Staff A indicated in her progress note dated 7/3/24 at 9:56 a.m. a large, dark, elongated intact blister was observed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $9K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA