MercyOne Centerville Medical Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 19 beds and averages 18.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.76 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.17 to 0.86 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to verify the dosage on a bottle of Morphine was correct when received from the pharmacy and failed to administer the correct dose of Morphine as ordered for one of four residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 18 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 as cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12 and had the following diagnoses: Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety Disorder and COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). The MDS also identified Resident #1 to be totally dependent on staff for assistance with showers/baths, lower body dressing, putting on and removing footwear and required substantial/maximal assist with toileting, upper body dressing and personal hygiene. On [DATE] the Care Plan identified Resident #1 with the problem of risk of discomfort related to end of life process and directed the staff to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to inform residents/resident representatives in advance of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for medications (Residents #3, #4, #10, #14, #18). The facility reported a census of 19 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 7/11/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #4 which included non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, and diabetes. The MDS stated the resident took antipsychotics and antidepressant medications and listed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The facility policy Gradual Dose Reduction and Use of Antipsychotics/Psychoactive Drugs revised 4/2023, stated staff would notify the resident/responsible party of the initiation, increase, or decrease of any psychoactive medications. The Order Summary Report listed the following orders:a. 5/13/25 sertraline (an antidepressant) 100 milligrams(mg) 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on initial kitchen tour observation, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the removal of out dated nutritional supplement drinks from a dry good storage area in the kitchen in order to prevent the service and resident consumption of an unsafe, expired food product. The facility reported a census of 19 residents. Findings include: On 8/25/25 at 10:51 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, observation revealed a total of 13 Glucerna, a type of nutritional shake supplement, creamy strawberry flavor in 8 ounce individual serve cartons an expiration date of July 2025. The expired Glucerna drink was located on a dry storage shelf in kitchen with other supplement drinks, including other non-expired Glucerna flavors. The Dietary Manager confirmed the Glucerna in the creamy strawberry flavor had expired the end of July 2025. ON 8/26/2025 at 9:22 AM, the Dietary Manager reported dietary staff had removed the out dated Glucerna. The Dietary Manager explained Staff C, Dietary Aide, went through the supplements and looked for out dated product…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff dressed a resident in a dignified manner and utilized incontinent products appropriately for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 19 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 7/11/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #4 which included non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, and diabetes. The MDS stated the resident was dependent on staff for lower body dressing and toileting hygiene and listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 9 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The facility policy Scope of Service-Long Term Care Department, revised 5/2019, stated the facility would maintain respect for residents. A Care Plan entry, revised 8/1/23, stated the resident required extensive assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). A Care Plan entry, revised 4/14/24, stated the resident required extensive assistance with dressing. On 8/27/25 at 12:52 p.m., Staff A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the hospitalization and discharge of residents for 2 of 2 residents sampled (Resident #3 and #23) with a hospitalization or discharge. The facility reported a census of 19 residents. Findings include:1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #3, dated 6/23/25, identified the resident had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 15 out of 15 (indicative no cognitive impairment).On 8/25/25 at 1:19 PM, the resident reported a recent hospitalization in July 2025.Review of the clinical MDS list for Resident #3 revealed a lack of an MDS to indicate the resident discharged to the hospital with an anticipated return or reentry to the facility in the month of July 2025.On 8/28/25, review of Progress Notes for Resident #3 revealed the following:a. A progress note, titled Health Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 2 of 16 residents reviewed (Residents #3 and #7). The facility reported a census of 19 residents.Findings include:1. Resident #7's electronic health record (EHR) MDS list, reviewed on 8/28/25, documented her 7/24/25 quarterly MDS was in progress. The facility MDS Transmission Policy and Procedure, revised 3/2015, stated the facility would ensure accurate completion and submission of federally required assessments including quarterly, discharge, and reentry assessments. On 8/27/25 at 1:50 p.m., the MDS Coordinator stated she was aware she did not complete the MDS assessments very well lately and said she did not get enough time for this. She stated she found one that was due “last month” that was not completed. On 8/28/25 at 10:54 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated staff should complete MDS assessments in the appropriate time frames. 2.The MDS assessment for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan identified diuretic (a medication which reduced fluid in the body) and antidepressant medications and failed to address the risk of skin impairment for a resident with a history of skin breakdown for 2 of 16 residents reviewed for care plans (Residents #10 and #17). The facility reported a census of 19 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool dated 7/21/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #10 which included anxiety, osteoarthritis (inflammation of the bone and joints), asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or chronic lung disease (diseases which can cause shortness of breath/difficulty breathing). The MDS stated the resident received diuretic and antidepressant medications and listed her BIMS(Brief Interview for Mental Status) score as 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The facility policy Comprehensive Care Plans, effective 7/2025, stated Care Plans would include skin conditions and medications. The August 2025 Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, resident and family interview, staff interview, hospice staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff revised a resident's care plan to include hospice services within 7 days after the completion of a significant change in condition comprehensive assessment and failed to include hospice professional staff in the care planning process for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for hospice services (Resident #2). The facility staff failed to include resident/family in the participation and development of their care plan for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for care planning participation (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 19 residents. Findings include:1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change in condition assessment for Resident #2, dated 4/8/25, and the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 7/9/25, identified a facility admission date of 10/6/2014, indicating the resident received hospice services, and identified diagnoses of major depressive disorder, edema (fluid retention), unspecified joint pain, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff provided personal hygiene assistance to a dependent resident in a timely manner after an episode of bowel and urine incontinence for 1 of 1 resident's sampled (Resident #15) with a reported concern of delayed assistance in care. The facility reported a census of 19 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15, dated 8/16/25, identified diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarct (stroke), hypomagnesemia (low magnesium level) and obstructive sleep apnea (difficulty breathing or loss of breath when asleep). The MDS assessment included a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 (indicative of a mild cognitive impairment) and assessed the resident was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, dressing and transfers, and required maximum assistance for personal hygiene. The Care Plan for Resident #15, last revised 8/25/25, revealed the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient activities for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for activities (Residents #5, #6, and#18). The facility reported a census of 19 residents. Findings include: 1. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 5/13/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #5 which included heart failure, anxiety, and depression. The MDS stated the following activities were very important to the resident: books, newspapers, being around animals, news, group activities, favorite activities, going outside for fresh air, and religious practices. The MDS listed the resident’s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The facility policy Long Term Care (LTC) Resident Activities, effective 1/2025, stated the facility would provide an on-going person centered activity program. An 8/15/25 Care Plan entry stated the resident would continue to attend activities twice per day. On 8/25/25 at 11:40 a.m., Resident #5 stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in IA