Chapters Living of Council Bluffs
3000 Risen Son Blvd, Council Bluffs, IA 51503 · For profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (712) 366-9655 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0606) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $163,800 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-30)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 0.0% | 17.1% | 15.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 4.6% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 11.7% | 1.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 2.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.2% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.8% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.8% | 20.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 25.2% | 4.2% | 4.7% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.3% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 37.9% | 19.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 2.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.0% | 73.3% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.3% | 20.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.7% | 13.2% | 12.0% | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 160 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 80.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.9%CMS range 53.4–72.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 8.2–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 80.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 80.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 73.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 4.7–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.85 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 29.0 residents a day — about 28% occupied, or roughly 73 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.84 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.08 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.23 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
68 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, provider interviews, resident interviews, staff interviews, family interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff provided skin assessments, failed to notify the provider of deterioration timely and failed to implement interventions to prevent and treat the development and worsening of pressure ulcers for 7 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident #29, #2, #9, #30, #22, #23, and #21). The facility failure to assess a Stage II pressure ulcer from 12/16/25 through 1/3/26 resulted in Resident #29's wound to deteriorate to an unstageable ulcer due to necrosis (dead tissue) with infection that required debridement of the wound and then hospitalization. Significant debridement required with the wound base extending down into ligamentous structures running along the posterior sacrum and there was exposed bone. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of January 2, 2026 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespreadDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, resident interviews, family interviews, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide an opportunity for a comprehensive care plan to be reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team composed of each resident and resident representative to allow developing the care plan and making decisions about his or her care. The facility also failed to complete revisions to care plans when there was a change in the residents care to 10 of 20 residents reviewed (Resident #23, #11, #7, #8, #21 #2, #3, #9, #29, and #30). The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include:1.According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 10/24/2025, Resident #23 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3. A BIMS score of 3 suggested severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the following diagnoses for Resident #23: Alzheimer's disease, hip fracture, anxiety, depression, muscle weakness and diabetes mellitus. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility assessment, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for Quarter 4 2025 ([DATE] - [DATE]) review, facility staffing reports review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate staff reports for the PBJ Staffing Data Report. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include: The PBJ Staffing Data Report run date [DATE] for quarter 4 2025 triggered for failing to submit data for the quarter and one star staffing rating.Review of weekend staffing schedules for months of July, August, September, October, November, December and January revealed on [DATE] 10:00 PM - 6:00 AM 1 nurse and 1 Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA), [DATE] 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM 2 CNA, [DATE] 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM 2 CNA 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM 2 CNA, [DATE] 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM 1 nurse, [DATE] 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM 1 nurse, [DATE] 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM 1 nurse 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM 1 nurse 10:00 PM - 6:00 AM 1 nurse and 1 CNA, [DATE] 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility assessment, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility plan review the facility failed to demonstrate good faith attempts to correct quality deficiencies based on issues that were identified with repeat deficiencies in 11 areas over the last year and development of performance improvement plans (PIPs) for monitoring and tracking for effectiveness. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include:Review of CMS Form 2567 with a date the survey was completed as 11/12/25 documented F-880 infection prevention and control. One repeated deficiencies identified during the current survey.Review of CMS Form 2567 with a date the survey was completed as 6/13/25 documented F-584 safe/clean/comfortable/homelike environment, F-657 care plan revision, F-684 Quality Care, F-686 treatment of pressure ulcer, F-725 sufficient nursing staff and F-842 resident records. Six repeated deficiencies identified during the current survey.Review of CMS Form 2567 with a date the survey was completed as 1/9/25 documented F-550 resident rights/exercise of rights, F-641…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility assessment, clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to properly establish and implement written policies and procedures for the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan and properly monitor and measure its success and track performance to ensure that improvements are realized and sustained for the QAPI plan. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include:Clinical record review completed on 1/29/26 at 12:20 PM revealed no QAPI policy in place with a description of how the facility would identify, report, track, investigate and analyze adverse events or problem-prone concerns, a description as to how the facility obtains and uses any feedback from resident representatives to identify high-risk or problem prone issues, and how the facility monitored the effectiveness of its performance improvement activities to ensure improvements are sustained established. Clinical record review also revealed no Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) developed to track or ensure improvements.On 1/29/26 at 12:23 PM the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and staff interview the facility failed to have the minimum members of the quality assessment and assurance committee meet quarterly. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include: Review of document dated 4/17/25 titled, QAPI Attendance documented no Infection Preventionist (IP) present at the meeting. Review of document dated 7/17/25 titled, QAPI Attendance documented no Medical Director present at the meeting.Review of document dated 8/28/25 titled, QAPI Attendance documented no Medical Director or Infection Preventionist present at the meeting.Review of document dated 10/23/25 titled, QAPI Attendance documented no Director of Nursing (DON) or Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) present at the meeting.Clinical record review completed on 1/29/26 at 12:20 PM revealed no QAPI policy in place with a description of how the facility would identify, report, track, investigate and analyze adverse events or problem-prone concerns, a description as to how the facility obtains and uses any feedback from resident representatives to identify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, facility assessment review and facility policy review the facility failed to develop and implement a facility wide system to monitor protocols and the use of antibiotics prescribed to residents. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include:During an interview on 1/29/26 at 9:51 AM, Staff H, Infection Preventionist (IP) / MDS Coordinator stated she had been in the IP position since June 2025. Staff H explained the facility does not have currently have Antibiotic Stewardship Program. Staff H stated she is familiar with an Antibiotic Stewardship Program and the requirements. Staff H stated a review of antibiotic use for residents prescribed by the physicians was occurring. Staff H stated for the quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings she does keep track of the residents that were prescribed antibiotics for the quarter, but nothing further. Staff H explained management talked about the results of lab cultures in the morning meetings daily but she does not track antibiotic use, or infection trends. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0887 — widespreadEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, employee record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to offer COVID 19 vaccinations and education regarding the benefits of vaccination to facility employees. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include: During an interview on 1/28/26 at 4:28 PM, Staff J, Registered Nurse (RN) stated he had not been offered a COVID 19 vaccine at the facility this last year. Staff J stated the facility did not inquire if he had received the recent Covid 19 vaccination. During an interview on 1/28/26 at 4:28 PM, Staff L, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated she had not been offered a COVID 19 vaccine at the facility this last year. Staff L stated the facility did not inquire if she had received the recent Covid 19 vaccination or her vaccination status. During an interview on 1/29/26 at 9:51 AM, Staff H, Infection Preventionist (IP) / MDS Coordinator stated she had been in the IP position since June 2025. Staff H stated the facility had never offered COVID 19 vaccines to the staff at the facility. Staff H stated there was an annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident Council Meeting, observations, clinical record review, resident interviews, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide dignity and respect. Staff refused to wear gloves, a staff was reported to have gone through a resident's personal belongings, pushing a resident partially exposed in a wheelchair (w/c), residents reporting being spoken to rudely, residents stating care was denied or length of time to provide care, and fear of retaliation from staff to 6 of 12 residents reviewed (Resident #7, #17, #33, #16, #15 and #29 ). The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 indicating moderate cognitive deficit. The document provided the resident utilized a manual w/c and required partial/moderate assistance. The document disclosed the resident had diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, nonrheumatic aortic valve stenosis, and unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0572 — patternGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, facility document review and policy review the facility failed to provide ongoing education to residents and/or their representatives on Resident Rights in a format that is understandable to them. The facility had a census of 28.Findings include:On 1/27/26 at 10:25 AM during the Resident Council meeting, the residents present indicated they were unaware of having rights, knowing what the Resident Rights were or if they were posted within the facility for their knowledge.Review of Resident Council Minutes for 11/25, 12/25 and 1/26 revealed a variety of facility leadership in attendance at the meetings with no education provided to the residents on Resident Rights. During the Resident Council meeting on 1/27/26 Staff K, Life Enrichment Director, stated she normally assisted with leading the Resident Council, but if she was not available an Activity Coordinator filled her position. Staff K acknowledged the staff had not been reviewing/educating residents on Resident Rights during Resident Council meetings. The Director of Nursing, DON,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility document reviews the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representatives accessible reports related to surveys, certifications and complaint investigations for the facility during the 3 preceding years and any plan of correction with respect to the facility. The facility had a census of 28. Findings include: On 1/21/26 at 9:20 AM the Survey Binder did not have 3 years of surveys/complaints. On 1/22/26 at 8:00 AM the Survey Binder did not have 3 years of surveys/complaints. On 1/27/26 at 10:25 AM during the Resident Council meeting the residents present did not know about having recent State Inspection documents and plans of correction available for their review. The residents did not know where those documents would be kept for their knowledge. Staff K, Life Enrichment Director, present during the Resident Council meeting on 1/27/26 could not provide additional information regarding the availability of the State Inspections for residents and/or their representatives. On 1/27/26 during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 57 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interviews, family interview, provider interview and policy review the facility failed to notify the resident's representative / family / Power of Attorney (POA) and physician for change in condition when a resident had a head injury and residents had a new or worsening wound for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #2, #15, #29, #30 and #23) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #2 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries and Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD) present. The MDS documented admission date for Resident #2 of 11/28/25 Review of Resident #2's (Electronic Health Record) EHR dated 11/28/25 titled, Discharge Summary documented a Braden scale score of 17 with a reposition schedule at least every 2 hours. The Discharge Summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, resident interviews, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide the residents with a comfortable / clean homelike environment by resident rooms found with various debris on the floor and failed to ensure resident's personal property was protected from loss or theft no personal inventory sheet was completed upon entry to the facility for 4 of 12 residents reviewed (Resident #15, #30, #38 and #11). The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 1/20/26 at 11:49 AM Resident #15 stated that Staff Y, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) was going through her bag of personal belongings with Staff EE, CNA present in the room. Resident #15 stated she told Staff J about the incident. On 1/20/26 at 11:52 AM Resident #15 stated she had 4 pairs of pants that were $25 or $30 apiece and only had 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident council meeting, resident interview, staff interviews, document review and policy review the facility failed to document grievances when residents voiced concerns, educated staff on where grievance forms could be found and when to fill grievance forms out, make prompt efforts to resolve grievances the resident may have and have grievance forms available for staff, residents and resident family members to complete for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #15 and #29). The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include: On 1/27/26 at 10:25 AM at the Resident Council meeting, the residents present stated they were unaware of what grievances were, where to locate a grievance form, how to file a grievance and if the facility responded to grievances. 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 1/20/26 at 11:49 AM Resident #15 stated on 1/12/26 she sat in soiled urine and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — patternNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to perform further background checks clearing an employee for hire that was on probation for exploitation. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include:Review of Staff A's Registered Nurse (RN) employee file revealed the following:Hired date of 9/8/2025;Single Contact License and Background Check completed on 9/4/2025 at 2:36 PM;Background Check showed further research under the criminal history section;QuickConfirm License Verification Report dated 9/4/2025 at 2:53 PM showed her RN license was on probation-RN privilege adverse action by Nebraska;QuickConfirm License Verification Report documented on 10/30/2024 action was taken against Staff's Nebraska nursing license; against privilege to practice-yesQuickConfirm License Verification Report documented Staff A was on probation from 4/18/2025-4/18/2027 in Iowa for error in prescribing, dispensing or administrating medication or sedation, against privilege to practice-noStaff A's employee file did not contain further research…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel file review, policy review, document review, and staff interviews the facility failed to implement the abuse and neglect policy by not completing background checks prior to staff employment. The facility also failed to implement their abuse policies when staff reported concerns about a staff member and complete further research when Staff A's background check suggested one be completed. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include:Review of Staff A's Registered Nurse (RN) employee file revealed the following: a) hired date of [DATE]; b) Single Contact License and Background Check completed on [DATE] at 2:36 PM; c) Background Check showed further research under the criminal history section; d) QuickConfirm License Verification Report dated [DATE] at 2:53 PM showed her RN license was on probation-RN privilege adverse action by Nebraska; e) QuickConfrim License Verification Report documented on [DATE] action was taken against Staff's Nebraska nursing license; against privilege…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility investigative file review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation when it was reported Staff A signed out Resident #3's oxycodone but failed to administer the medication. The facility also failed to investigate concerns brought to them from staff members related to Staff A in September and December. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include: 1.According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of [DATE] documented Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11. A BIMS score of 11 suggested mild cognitive impairment. Resident #3 did not receive a scheduled pain medication regimen; she did receive as needed (PRN) pain medications or was offered and declined. During the pain assessment Resident #3 did have pain at any time in the last 5 days occasionally. Resident #3 indicated the pain rarely the pain made it hard for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff and family interviews, and facility policy review. The facility failed to provide oral cares for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #22, #2, #3, #29, and #30) reviewed and also failed to provide toileting and repositioning for Resident #29. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include:1.According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 10/31/2025 documented Resident #22 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4. A BIMS score of 4 suggested severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident required substantial/maximal assistance with oral hygiene. Resident #22 had the following diagnoses listed: multiple sclerosis, neurogenic bladder, dementia and depression. The Care Plan Focus Area with a revision date of 11/18/2020 documented Resident #22 had activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit due to her multiple sclerosis diagnoses and required the assistance of one staff for daily grooming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review, Facility Assessment review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets by not having a staff on duty at the facility trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at all times. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include: On [DATE] at 11:03 AM the DON stated there was nothing available for CPR certification on any staff at the facility. The DON explained there was no list for CPR certified staff and no way Staff O planned 24 hour CPR coverage at the facility. The DON stated Staff O thought as long as a nurse was present that nurse was CPR certified. The DON stated she expected the facility would have a list of CPR certified staff to ensure appropriate coverage. On [DATE] at 11:11 AM Staff P stated the facility did not have any CPR list when she was the interim DON from [DATE] - [DATE]. Staff P stated there was no list for CPR certified staff when she was the interim DON and CPR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interviews and policy review the facility failed to protect residents from possible accidents and injuries for 4 of 12 residents (Residents #7, #41, #2 and #3) reviewed. The facility failed to protect residents when dependently pushed in manual wheelchairs (w/c's) without the use of footrests and using only 1 staff member with the use of dependent non-weight bearing mechanical lifts. Additionally the facility failed to protect the residents from possible scalding injuries with water temperatures above the recommended temperature range for burn prevention. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include:1. Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 indicating moderate cognitive deficit. The resident utilized a manual w/c with partial/moderate assistance. The document disclosed diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, nonrheumatic aortic valve stenosis, unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to provide drinks to residents, during lunch service. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include:During dining room observations on 1/21/2026 at 12:05 PM observed six residents sitting at the tables with 4 residents at the assisted tables with two staff and a family member present. There were no drinks on the tables. At 12:17 PM a therapist brought Resident #40 to the dining room table, asked if she wanted a glass of water and the resident accepted it. At 12:21 PM Staff F Dietary Aide (DA) brought a drink cart down the hall from the kitchen to the dining room and began to hand out drinks to residents at the assisted tables. At 12:25 PM Staff F left the dining room with menu tickets. At 12:29 PM Staff F entered the dining room with the food cart, at 12:31 PM delivered 3 trays to residents that did not require assistance with feeding. The residents continued to not have drinks on their table. At 12:37 PM Resident #34 propelled herself from the table to the drink cart and got a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility document review, Facility Assessment review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide enough nursing staff to assure residents safety with transfers, provided appropriate care and resident care completed in a timely manner. The facility reported a census of 28.Findings include: Review of weekend staffing schedules for months of July, August, September, October, November, December and January revealed the following:On 7/6/25 10:00 PM - 6:00 AM 1 nurse and 1 CNAOn 7/13/25 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM 2 CNAOn 8/3/25 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM 2 CNA, 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM 2 CNAOn 9/20/25 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM 1 nurseOn 9/21/25 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM 1 nurseOn 11/18/25 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM 1 nurse, 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM 1 nurse, 10:00 PM - 6:00 AM 1 nurse and 1 CNAOn 1/4/26 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM 1 nurseOn 1/17/26 6:00 AM - 2:00 PM 1 nurse and 2 CNA, 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM 1 nurse and 3 CNA, 10:00 PM - 6:00 AM 1 nurse and 1 CNA.Review of weekday schedules Monday - Friday for months of July, August, September, October, November, December and January revealed the followingOn 7/7/25 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility document review, Facility Assessment review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets by not providing staff orientation for newly hired staff or agency staff. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include: On 1/12/26 at 12:00 PM AA, CNA stated she had worked at the facility for about 4 months. Staff AA stated when she started there was not an orientation check list. Staff AA stated the facility just threw her out to the floor. Staff AA stated she did not receive any training when she started. Staff AA stated she had worked as a CNA prior to working at the facility. On 1/8/26 at 5:22 PM Staff BB, CNA stated he had not received any formal training at the facility. Staff BB stated he was given to a young lady for 3 days to follow and another CNA to work with for a couple nights. Stated there was not a checklist or orientation packet when he was hired. Staff BB stated it would have been nice to have a checklist or orientation packet to ensure he knew how the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility document review, facility assessment review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was at the facility for 8 consecutive hours. The facility reported a census of 28.Findings include: Review of facility staff schedules for 7/1/25 - 1/19/26 revealed an RN was not present in the building for 8 consecutive hours on 8/23/25, 9/5/25, 9/12/25, 10/11/25, 10/25/25, 11/8/25, 11/18/25 11/22/25, 11/23/25, 12/7/25, 12/20/25, 12/21/25, 12/28/25, 1/9/26 and 1/17/26.On 1/28/26 at 10:50 PM Staff O, Certified Medication Assistant (CMA) / Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) / Scheduler stated had worked as the scheduler for the facility since September of 2025. Staff O stated when developing a schedule she needs to make sure there is a CNA in every section GP1, GP2 and GP3. Staff O stated nurses on GP1 and GP2. Staff O stated on am shift and pm shifts. Staff O stated on the overnight shift there is only 1 nurse and 2 CNAs. Staff O acknowledged those assignments have not happened every day since she had taken over. Staff O stated there were days that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility assessment review, facility document review and staff interviews the facility failed to complete an employee performance review at least once every 12 months. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: On 1/21/26 at 7:52 AM Staff R, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) stated she had never had a performance evaluation since working at the facility. Staff R explained she had worked at the facility since 12/23.On 1/28/26 at 4:19 PM Staff N, CNA / Interim Social Services Director stated she had gotten evaluations when the previous owners ran the facility. Staff N stated she had not had an evaluation in over a year. On 1/28/26 at 4:28 PM Staff J, Registered Nurse (RN) had worked at the facility for 6 years. Staff J stated he had not had any performance evaluations in the last year. Staff J stated had not had a performance evaluation since 2021. Review of Personnel File for Staff J documented no performance evaluations.Review of document titled, Facility Assessment documented employees are provided with an annual performance appraisal and potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. Areas identified for failure for employment of nutritional management staff with competencies included food preparation, meal delivery not including licensed nurses, nurse aides or paid feeding assistants involved with assisting residents with eating, meal service delivery in a timely manner to maintain food safety and temperature and within 45 minutes or less of resident request and facility's scheduled time for meals. Findings include: During continuous dining room observation on 1/20/2026 at 11:50 AM Resident#9 and #17 stated all the meals are always late. They indicated breakfast was not served until 9:00 AM today. Both residents stated breakfast is the worst because residents can not get their meals until everyone is at the assisted table with staff present. They stated it's not the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility document review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide a well balanced diet that meets nutritional and special dietary needs of residents by not following the approved menu for a meal. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include:Observation on 1/21/26 at 10:34 AM Staff V Cook/Dietary Manager, prepared 3 puree meals. The staff completed the puree process for egg noodles, Chicken [NAME] and vegetables following the menu. Following completion of the modification of the Chicken [NAME] and noodles, the staff added additional [NAME] sauce to the top to prevent drying out of the modification. The 2 plates required for the nursing facility were covered with plastic and placed on the warming shelf. Continuous observation of the meal service on 1/21/26 beginning at 12:02 PM noted the following:Staff V re-warmed the pureed plates from 147 degrees to 167 degrees in the microwave and set on the delivery cart.Staff V prepared 3 mechanical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature to 6 of 20 residents reviewed (Resident #17, #42, #36, #44, #3 and #15). The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include:1. Resident #17's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 12/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The document disclosed the resident was independent with eating. On 1/20/26 at 10:45 AM the resident stated the food was not hot when it was supposed to be hot. The resident stated she did tell undisclosed staff that the food was not hot and was told to be grateful she got food. The resident stated she ate in the dining room. 2. Resident #42's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score 12/15 indicating moderate cognitive deficit. The document disclosed the resident was independent with eating. On 1/20/26 at 12:49 PM Resident #42 stated she ate in her room and had room trays. The resident stated her food had been cold when her trays…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to prepare, serve and distribute food in accordance with food service safety for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #3, #9, #15) reviewed, as well as general practices for mealtime service. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 1/22/26 at 9:26 AM an observation of Resident #3's breakfast tray delivered to the room. On 1/22/26 at 9:26 AM Resident #3 acknowledged her food was just dropped off. Resident #3 stated 9:30 AM does feel a little late for breakfast but the breakfast meal has come much later. 2. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 1/20/26 at 11:29 AM Resident #9 stated you never know when the meal will be served. Resident #9 stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to properly dispose of room trays with left-over food and beverages in a timely manner. The facility further failed to dispose of garbage and waste properly. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include:On 1/21/2026 at 7:00 AM outside room GP10 observed a cart with room trays, plates, and cups on it. Breakfast had not been served prior to this. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator/Infection Preventionist observed the surveyor in front the cart and removed it from the hall at 7:05 AM. At 9:06 AM in a cubie across from the Clinical Office observed three meal trays that contained what looked like an uncovered bowl of vegetable soup, cup of brown liquid, uncovered ice cream cups, two plates with sloppy joe sandwiches on them (from 1/20/2026 lunch meal), carrots, green beans, opened fruit cup and silverware. At 9:45 AM the food trays remained in the cubie across from the clinical office. At 10:30 AM the trays had been moved to a cart and placed in front of the nurse's station (main) by the Long-Term Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, policy review and facility document review the facility failed to provide complete and accurate records when inventory lists were not completed, failed to accurately document administration of medication, documented treatments completed before doing them, failed to lock or close a laptop leaving confidential health information accessible, and documented refrigerator temperatures falsely for 7 of 12 resident reviewed (Resident #3, #15, #11, #44, #21, #3 and #11). The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #3 had diagnoses of pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, pressure ulcer of right buttocks stage 4 and pressure ulcer of left buttocks stage 4. Review of Resident #3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented a physician's order with a start date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure staff utilized consistent infection controls techniques as evidenced by a failure to complete hand hygiene during resident cares, remove personal protective equipment prior to exiting a residents room, sanitize shared resident equipment after use, and ensure catheter tubing, and oxygen tube secured in a position to not fall on the floor for 6 of 12 residents (Resident's #2, #22, #23, #11, #3 and #17) in the sample, and failed to review the infection control policy at least annually. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include:1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Review of Resident #2 Physician orders revealed the following orders: a. Cleanse, dry, paint with betadine and cover with Mepilex Foam dressing to right heel. One time a day for DTI (deep tissue injury).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN), Form CMS-10055 for 3/3 residents reviewed (Resident #50, #51, #52). The facility reported a census of 28. Findings include: 1. Resident #50 signed a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), Form CMS 10123-NOMNC approved 12/31/11, on 10/17/25 indicating coverage of his skilled nursing services would end on 10/21/25. The facility failed to provide the SNF ABN, CMS Form-10055, for the resident to complete. The facility failed to utilize a current Center for Medicare Services (CMS) NOMNC Form CMS-10124-DENC expiration 11/30/27.2. Resident #51 signed a NOMNC, Form CMS 10123-NOMNC approved 12/31/11, on 10/17/25 indicating coverage of his skilled nursing services would end on 10/19/25. The facility failed to provide the SNF ABN, CMS Form-10055, for the resident to complete. The facility failed to utilize a current Center for Medicare Services (CMS) NOMNC Form CMS-10124-DENC expiration 11/30/27.3. Resident #52 signed a NOMNC, Form CMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (Resident #3, 11, and 32) reviewed were free from exploitation. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include:1.According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 11/7/2025 documented Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11. A BIMS score of 11 suggested mild cognitive impairment. Resident #3 did not receive a scheduled pain medication regimen; she did receive as needed (PRN) pain medications or was offered and declined. During the pain assessment Resident #3 did have pain at any time in the last 5 days occasionally. Resident #3 indicated the pain rarely the pain made it hard for her to sleep nor did it limit her day-to-day activities. The MDS documented Resident #3 rated her pain at a 4 out of 10 (zero being no pain and ten as the worst pain you can imagine). The MDS documented Resident #3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, document review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to obtain bed hold notifications for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #5 and #29) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include: 1.According to the discharge-return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 8/13/2025 documented Resident #5 was discharged to a short-term general hospital on 8/13/2025. Record review revealed the following progress note:a) On 8/13/2025 at 12:45 PM shortly after he was assisted to recliner for therapy, resident experienced hypotension, increased weakness, dizziness, nausea and requested to go back to hospital,b) On 8/13/2025 at 4:54 PM resident was admitted to the hospital due to declining renal function. Record review revealed it lacked a bed hold form completed by Resident #5 and/or his representative. On 1/23/2025 at 10:39 AM via email communication the Administrator acknowledged facility was unable to locate Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews the facility failed to accurately code the type of assessment for 1 of 2 discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (a federally mandated, standardized, comprehensive clinical assessment tool used in nursing homes to evaluate functional, medical, and psychological status, it identifies resident problems, strengths, and preferences to guide care planning and determine reimbursement) (Resident #5). The facility also failed to accurately code medications taken when reviewing unnecessary medications for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #5 and #23). The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include: 1. The MDS Entry assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #5 documented this was not the first assessment since his most recent reentry to the facility. The MDS admission assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #5 documented this was the first assessment since his most recent reentry to the facility. The MDS Discharge assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to develop and implement a Baseline Care Plan for 2 of 10 residents (Residents #17, #42) reviewed. The facility failed to develop and involve the resident and/or resident representative in the development of the Baseline Care Plan within 48 hours of admission. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #17 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The document disclosed diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (A-fib), heart failure, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The resident utilized oxygen while a resident. The Care Plan dated 1/20/26 revealed a focus area related to oxygen therapy revised 1/20/26 with staff interventions of providing medications as ordered, oxygen as ordered by the physician, and monitor/document/report signs and symptoms of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide resident centered activities that incorporated the resident's interests, hobbies to maintain and/or improve a resident's physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and independence for 1/10 residents (Resident #21) reviewed. The facility failed to create opportunities for the resident to have a meaningful life by supporting her domain of wellness (autonomy, connectedness, joy and meaning). The facility reported a census of 28.Findings include:Resident #21's MDS dated [DATE] Significant Change export ready revealed a BIMS score of 8/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The document disclosed the resident did not have a catheter, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and dependent for bed mobility and transfers. The document indicated the resident's diagnoses included heart failure, atrial fibrillation (A-fib) and impaired brain function. The MDS revealed the resident had (1) Stage 2 pressure ulcer, partial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, provider interview, resident and family interview, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to appropriately assess a resident with a head injury and appropriately complete assessments / provide interventions for a diabetic ulcer for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #15, and #30). The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include:1.The MDS dated [DATE] documented Resident #15 had a BIMS of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 1/20/26 at 11:49 AM Resident #15 stated she told Staff P RN / Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) about the sore on her foot and she did nothing about it. Resident #15 stated Staff J, RN was the nurse that finally did something about it. Review of Resident #15's (Treatment Administration Record) TAR documented a physician's order with a start date of 1/15/26 to cleanse 2nd toe on left foot with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Triple Antibiotic Ointment (TAO) and cover with band aid daily.Review of Resident #15's (Electronic Health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and observation the facility failed to implement policies and procedures regarding the technical aspect of feeding tubes by pushing enteral flushes with a piston syringe into the enteral tube for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #44). The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #44's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility from another nursing home on 1/15/2026. The MDS then revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #44 utilized a feeding tube while at the facility.Review of Resident #44's Electronic Health Record (EHR) page titled, Clinical Physician's Orders revealed an order to flush Resident #44's tube with 25 milliliters of water twice a day starting 1/15/2026. Observation on 1/21/2026 at 10:45 AM Staff A Registered Nurse (RN) completed hand hygiene, donned gown, gloves, and goggles. Staff A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, electronic medical record (EMR) reviews, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #17) reviewed, requiring the use of oxygen. The facility reported a census of 28 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #17 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The document disclosed diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (A-fib), heart failure, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The resident utilized oxygen while a resident. The Care Plan dated 1/20/26 revealed a focus area related to oxygen therapy revised 1/20/26 with staff interventions of providing medications as ordered, oxygen as ordered by the physician, and monitor/document/report signs and symptoms of respiratory distress dated 1/20/26. Resident #17's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a form designed to meet individual needs and according to their assessments and Care Plans for 3 of 5 residents (Residents #3, #13, #23) reviewed. The facility failed to prepare and serve 3 meals according to the residents' prescribed diet orders. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The document disclosed the resident received a mechanically altered diet during the last 7 days of the assessment period. The resident's Care Plan dated 8/21/25 revealed a focus area of nutritional problems or potential nutritional problems related to needing a mechanical soft diet with increased protein revised 5/19/25. Interventions for staff included downgrading to mechanical soft due to a resident request related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, family and staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide therapeutic diets as prescribed by the primary care provider for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #23, #33, #42,) reviewed. The facility failed to follow physician orders for consistent carbohydrate (CCHO) and renal diets. The facility reported a census of 28.Findings include: Findings include:1. Resident #23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The document disclosed resident diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, high cholesterol, and Alzheimer's. The document included the resident consumed a therapeutic diet during the last 7 days of the assessment period. The resident's Care Plan dated 1/8/26 included a focus area related to a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to diabetes mellitus and dementia revised 2/28/25. Interventions for staff included explaining and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide the needed services in accordance with professional standards by not following physician orders for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #1, #2, #4, #3). The facility reported a census of 19 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 11/3/25 provided a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The document revealed the resident had diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (A-fib), heart failure, hypertension (HTN), urinary tract infection (UTI) - last 30 days and respiratory failure. The document disclosed Resident #1 had an indwelling catheter and took anticoagulant, diuretic, opioid, hypoglycemic and anticonvulsant medications. Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) 11/25 revealed the following entries: 11/1/25 No data for Olmesartan Medoxomil Tablet 20 mg; 1 tablet in the morning for HTN order date 10/31 and discharge (D/C) date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide a professional standard of quality of care by not completing catheter cares for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1, #2, #3). The facility reported a census of 19 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 11/3/25 provided a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The document revealed the resident had diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (A-fib), heart failure, hypertension (HTN), urinary tract infection (UTI) - last 30 days and respiratory failure. The document disclosed Resident #1 had an indwelling catheter and took anticoagulant, diuretic, opioid, hypoglycemic and anticonvulsant medications. Resident #1's Care Plan revised 11/4/25 provided a focus area of indwelling catheter revised on 11/4/25 with interventions of Enhanced Barrier Precautions initiated on 10/25/25 and monitor/record/report signs/symptoms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, Electronic Health Record (EHR) reviews, staff interviews, and policy reviews the facility failed to implement appropriate hand hygiene and infection control practices to mitigate the spread of pathogens during resident cares for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #2, #3). The facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and complete hand hygiene. The facility reported a census of 19. Findings include:1. The MDS for Resident #2 dated 10/31/25 provided a BIMS score of 4/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The document revealed the resident had diagnoses of coronary artery disease (CAD), HTN, neurogenic bladder, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and depression. The document disclosed Resident #2 had an indwelling catheter and took antidepressant and anticonvulsant medications.The Care Plan updated 10/9/25 revealed a focus area for suprapubic catheter due to neurogenic bladder initiated on 1/12/23 and revised on 10/9/25 with UTI on 10/7 with antibiotics as ordered. Interventions included catheter care every shift initiated 11/2/20, monitor/record/report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide the appropriate interventions to prevent falls for 2 or 3 residents (Resident #1, #9, and #10). The facility also failed to complete neurological assessments after 2 of 4 residents (Resident #4 and #10) after they experienced an unwitnessed fall. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 12/22/2024 Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2. A BIMS score of 2 suggested severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility. He required partial/moderate assistance for sitting to lying, lying to sitting, sitting to standing, chair/bed to chair transfer, and toilet transfer. The MDS documented he had a fall in the last month prior to admission/entry, in the last 2-6 months prior to admission/entry, and has had a fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's assessment and staff interview the facility failed to update the Facility Assessment. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: On 6/5/2025 at 12:48 PM the Administrator provided the Facility Assessment. The document was dated 7/2023 through 6/2024 with the previous facility name attached to it. On 6/10/2025 at 2:08 PM the CEO currently working as the Administrator stated the Executive Director or Administrator usually updates the Facility Assessment. He indicated they could not find and updated assessment and they have not updated once since they took over in February. On 6/10/2025 at 3:25 PM the Skilled Unit Manager/Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated she was unable to get in to the program the previous owners used to obtain policies. She went through the binders they have and could not find a policy the facility would follow in regards to the Facility Assistant. On 6/10/2025 at 3:58 PM corporate staff were asked to provide policies they would be implementing at the facility since taking over the facility. A list…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document reviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to employ a qualified person to serve as the Infection Preventionist (IP) for the facility. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: The facility provided a document from their previous owners, titled Infection Preventionist that documented the facility will employ one or more individuals with responsibility for implementing the facility's infection prevention and control program. The facility will designate a qualified individual as Infection Preventionist (IP) whose primary role is to coordinate and be actively accountable for the facility's infection prevention and control program and antibiotic stewardship program. The facility will ensure the IP works at least part-time at the facility, is adequately qualified and completed a specialized training in infection prevention and control through accredited continuing education. On 6/5/2025 at 11:50 PM the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator stated she is the facility's IP. When asked if she is certified she stated she is going…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment for residents. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: Observations on 6/3/2025 at 10:30 AM the area between the set of exit doors by room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed multiple dead June bugs on the floor. Continued observations on 6/4/2025, 6/5/2025, and 6/10/2025 revealed the area to still have multiple dead June bugs on the floor. On 6/4/2025 at 10:15 AM a family member of Resident #4, stated housekeeping has not been in her room since she has been admitted . One family member stated she has been picking up the debris on the floor in her mother's room and bathroom. On 6/4/25 at 10:45 AM the Director of Nursing was made aware of Resident #4's concern about the lack of cleaning to her room. On 6/5/2025 during a follow-up interview with Resident #4 and her family, they were informed the DON was made aware of their housekeeping concerns. The family indicated housekeeping still had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility investigative file review, staff and family interviews the facility failed to report to the State Agency, when Resident #3 reported staff were rude to her and threw her call light out of reach. The investigation included three resident reviews. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: According to an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) reference tool with an assessment date of 3/14/2025 Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15. A BIMS score of 15 suggested no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #3 required substantial/maximal assistance of staff for toileting hygiene and was dependent on staff for transfers to the toilet. The MDS indicated she was occasionally incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. The following diagnoses were listed for Resident #3: stroke, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure, thyroid disorder, and sleep apnea. The Care Plan focus area with an initiation date of 3/10/2025 documented Resident #3 needed assistance with Activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility investigative file review, staff and family interviews the facility failed to thoroughly investigate when Resident #3 reported staff was rude to her and removed her call light out of reach. The facility also failed to complete a thorough investigation when Resident #4 reported staff were mean to her. Three residents were reviewed related to this investigation. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: 1. According to an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) reference tool with an assessment date of 3/14/2025 Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15. A BIMS score of 15 suggested no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #3 required substantial/maximal assistance of staff for toileting hygiene and was dependent on staff for transfers to the toilet. The MDS indicated she was occasionally incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. The following diagnoses were listed for Resident #3: stroke, atrial fibrillation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Care Plan for 2 of 7 residents (Residents #5 and #9) after their admission. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include 1. According the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 4/15/2025 documented Resident #5 had a BIMS score of 14. A BIMS score of 14 suggested no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS documented she was at risk for developing pressure ulcers/pressure injuries and had 3 unhealed stage 4 pressure ulcers, present upon admission. The following treatments were listed for Resident #5: pressure reducing device for chair and bed, and pressure ulcer/injury care. The MDS listed the following diagnoses for Resident #5: pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, anemia, renal failure, stroke, sepsis, atrial fibrillation, pressure ulcer of right and left buttock stage 4, adult failure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to update 3 of 3 resident's Care Plans (Resident #1, #9 and #10) after they experienced a fall. The facility also failed to update 1 of 3 resident's (Resident #9) Care Plan when he developed a new pressure ulcer. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 12/22/2024 Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2. A BIMS score of 2 suggested severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility. He required partial/moderate assistance for sitting to lying, lying to sitting, sitting to standing, chair/bed to chair transfer, and toilet transfer. The MDS documented he had a fall in the last month prior to admission/entry, in the last 2-6 months prior to admission/entry, and had a fall since admission/entry with no injuries. The Care Plan focus area with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 resident's (Resident #2 and #5) treatment orders were signed out as being completed. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 2/25/2025 Resident #2 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8. A BIMS score of 8 suggested no mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented he was at risk for developing pressure ulcers/pressure injuries and had one unhealed stage 1 pressure ulcer/pressure injury. The MDS documented the following treatments: pressure reducing device for his chair and bed, and applications of ointments/medications other than to his feet. The MDS listed the following diagnoses for Resident #5: stroke, renal insufficiency, depression and obesity. The Care Plan focus area with an initiation date of 2/11/2025 documented Resident #2 had a pressure injury to his right and left lateral malleolus related to immobility. The care plan directed staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident council notes, facility assessment review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to provide sufficient staff for safe transfers and assisting residents timely when needed. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of April 2025 Resident Council Notes revealed a resident indicated it would be nice if they could have more Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) on the overnight shift. Review of the facility assessment dated 7/2023 through 6/2024 documented 1 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Registered Nurse (RN) to 15 residents ratio on the day shift, 1 LPN to 30 residents on the overnight shift, 1 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to 10 residents ratio on the day and evening shifts, and 1 CNA to 15 residents ration on the overnight shift. If the census is 30 or above, 1 Certified Medication Aide (CMA) works day shift, 8 hours. On 6/4/2025 at 10:00 AM Resident #7 stated staffing can be iffy at times. She reported she has had to weight for 40 minutes for help. She has been fighting a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and can't hold her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record view, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure 3 of 10 resident's (Resident #7, #8, and #10) records were complete and accurate. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 5/16/2025, Resident #7 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. A BIMS score of 10 suggested no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she was dependent on staff to shower or bathe self. The following diagnoses were listed for Resident #7: urinary tract infection (UTI), hypertension, anxiety, depression, and obesity. The Care Plan focus area with an initiation date of 5/12/2025 documented Resident #7 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The care plan documented she required the assistance of one staff for bathing and tub/shower transfers. Record review of Resident #7's bathing record, revealed only two showers were documented as being completed in the last 30 days. A shower was documented as being given on 5/24/2025 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control measured were used during food service. While preparing the lunch meal Staff F applied disposable gloves, then touched several surfaces before touching food. The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: On 1/7/24 at 11:15 AM Staff F, Culinary Supervisor (CS), prepared some grilled cheese sandwiches. He donned disposable gloves, grabbed the bag of bread, touched the counter, then reached into the bag and grabbed a piece of bread. He held the bread with the same gloved hand, buttered it with the other and placed it on the grill. He repeated the process two more times to make 3 sandwiches. Staff F then used the same gloved hand, reached into a container of sliced cheese, grabbed 6 slices of cheese, placed two slices on each piece of bread. He then buttered three more pieces of bread with the same gloved hands put the bread on top. On 1/08/25 at 6:27 AM, The Dietary Manager (DM) said that staff were taught not to use gloves unless they absolutely needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel file review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that all staff completed the required Dependent Adult Mandatory Reporter Training for 1 of 5 staff reviewed. The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: A review of the personal file for Staff E, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), reveled that as of [DATE], Staff E last completed the Dependent Adult Mandatory Reporter (DAMR) training, on [DATE]. The certificate indicated that after 3 years, the training should have been renewed. The file included a certification for DAMR training dated [DATE]. On [DATE] at 3:22 PM The Administrator acknowledged that when the personal file was requested by the survey team on [DATE], they discovered that Staff E had an expired DAMR training certificate. Staff E then completed the training. Going forward, they plan to have the business office establish a spreadsheet to monitor trainings so they can notify staff when an expiration date would be coming up. According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic health record review (EHR), resident interviews, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide dignity and respect during personal cares to 2 of 22 residents reviewed (Resident #8 and #175). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #8 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 1/8/25 at 9:30 AM Staff G Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) stated residents at the facility had told her about negative statements and care that Staff H had given. Staff G stated Resident #8 told her a couple days ago she was having a hard time standing up off the toilet. Staff G stated Resident #8 told her Staff H said she could not sit here and babysit you guys. Staff G stated Resident #8 was talking about the incident in the dining room. Staff G stated another resident that sat at the dining room table stated they could hear Staff H telling her that in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Records (EHR) review, and staff interviews the facility failed to represent an accurate assessment of the resident's status during the observation period of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) by not accurately assessing the use of insulin for 1 of 10 residents reviewed (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Finding include: The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #15 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #15's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a physician's order for Trulicity Subcutaneous Solution (glucagon like peptide) to inject 0.5mL subcutaneous in the morning every Monday. The MAR did not include an order for insulin. Review of Resident #15's MDS dated [DATE] documented insulin injections were given once in the last 7 days. Resident #15's MDS also documented orders for insulin were changed by the physician once during the last 7 days or since admission/entry or reentry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to follow professional standards of quality for 2 of 4 residents reviewed. Resident #172 had a low blood glucose reading, staff failed to document the reading and failed to follow up with a second check. Resident #9 had low blood pressure readings and staff failed to establish parameters to determine when to hold his hypertension medication. The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #172 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 (intact cognitive ability). She was totally dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, showers, and partial assistance with sit to stand and transfers. She was on pain medications, the MDS showed that she was not assessed for frequency or intensity. A Baseline Care Plan Summary, dated 12/3/24, showed that Resident #172 was admitted for skilled care after a hospitalization for extradural and subdural…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with facility staff and healthcare services, policy and record review the facility failed to ensure that follow up services and appointments were established before discharge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. Resident #173 was discharged to a hotel without securing home health services or follow up appointments with the doctor. The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Resident #173 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). He required partial assistance with showers or bath, supervision or touch assistance with toileting hygiene, dressing and applying footwear and transfers. The diagnosis for Resident #173 included orthostatic hypotension, type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. The admission Note dated 12/3/24 at 12:32 PM, showed that Resident #173 was admitted to the facility for Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy (PT/OT), and orthostatic hypotension…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and policy review the facility failed to assess pain and failed to complete vitals and complete a comprehensive assessment prior to transfer out for 1 of 4 residents reviewed. Resident #171 experienced severe pain related to a fracture and staff failed to assess pain levels, administer pain medication and notify the physician per the plan of care. The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #171 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident received scheduled and PRN (as needed) pain medications and experienced pain frequently. The MDS documented the resident limited participation in therapy and day to day activities frequently. She rated her pain at an 8 on a scale of 0-10 with 10 being the worse. The MDS listed diagnosis of lumbar vertebrae fractures and other multiple trauma, and arthritis. The Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when providing personal care and providing catheter care to a resident that was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2 and #180). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #2 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the utilization of an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #2's Medication Administration Record revealed a physician's order to change 16 FR 10cc monthly and change drainage bag at bedtime every 30 days for infection control. Review of Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE] documented utilization of indwelling catheter. On 1/7/25 at 10:09 AM Staff K, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) entered Resident #2's room applied gown, rolled sleeves up on gown,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to appropriately implement interventions to protect 1 out of 2 female residents from possible sexual abuse. The facility further failed to appropriately implement interventions to protect 1 out of 1 male residents from possible physical abuse by Resident #182. The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #182 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, asthma, and renal insufficiency. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Progress Notes revealed the following: a. 4/22/23 at 4:21 a.m., staff to visually observe resident that not attempting to touch, inappropriately touch other resident's every 4 hours, sleeping. b. 4/23/23 at 3:18 p.m., patient keeps looking for an exit. When staff assist with keeping patient in facility patient becomes combative and physically abusive.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for possible abuse by not interviewing all the witnesses for 2 of 3 incidents reviewed against 2 residents (Resident #183 and #184). The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #183 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety disorder, and pulmonary hypertension. Review of the facility provided investigation dated 4/29/23 revealed Resident #182 wheeled down a residential hallway in the facility and placed his hands on Resident #183's chest. This investigation further revealed there were no statements from any witnesses for the incident dated 4/29/23. Review of the clinical record lacked documentation of the incident dated 4/29/23. 2. The MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #184 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide treatment or services to a resident that had decreased range of motion to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 12 residents reviewed (Resident #22). The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Findings include: The MDS dated [DATE] documented Resident #22 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented a diagnosis of non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage in the hemisphere, subcortical. On 1/7/24 at 3:33 PM Resident #22 stated he only had only one treatment with any sort of therapy. Resident #22 stated no other treatments had been completed. Resident #22 stated he would like to have more therapy. Resident #22 stated he did not know who to tell he wanted more. Review of Resident #22's electronic health record (EHR) revealed no documentation of restorative programs in Progress Notes or in the task portion. On 1/9/24 at 4:21 PM Staff A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$163,800 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $163,800 — penalty dated 2026-01-30
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-06 for 27 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MO IA IL HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| BEH MO IA IL LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| SLB CAPITAL CH LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| ABRAMCZYK, SOLOMON | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| BARON, ELIYAHU | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| FELDMAN, STEVEN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| GELLER, SETH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| IANN, SAMUEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| OBERLANDER, CHAIM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| STRICKER, DANIEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| SHARP, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/03/2026 |
| WALKER, SHYANN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| CHAPTERS SENIOR LIVING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $761K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165466. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.