Accura Healthcare of South Des Moines
4911 SW 19th Street, Des Moines, IA 50315 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 89 certified beds · (515) 285-2559 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $52,632 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-25)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 30.1% | 17.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.6% | 4.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 1.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.4% | 4.2% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.7% | 3.8% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.3% | 16.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.1% | 20.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.4% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 4.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.4% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.1% | 19.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 11.5% | 73.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.4% | 20.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.3% | 13.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.17 | 1.49 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.36 | 2.08 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.3%CMS range 44.7–67.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.3–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.63 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 82.9 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.90 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
67 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, documentation from the facility self-report, staff interviews and facility policy the facility failed to provide an environment free from sexual abuse for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for sexual abuse. (Resident #1). Resident #2, the aggressor was well known for sexual behavior and comments toward other females. Resident #1 experienced unwanted sexual touching on 3/16/24. On 4/23/24, Resident #2 was observed sitting by Resident #4 who had poor cognitive status, and was unsupervised by staff for over two minutes. A serious adverse outcome was likely to occur as the facility failed to provide proper supervision of Resident#2, which put Resident#4 and any other vulnerable residents at risk for unwanted sexual advances. There was an immediate need for the facility to take steps to ensure all residents were protected from the risk of abuse. The facility reported a census of 78 residents. On April 23rd, 2024 at 5:45 p.m., the Iowa Department of Inspections, Appeals, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement safety measures and interventions to protect residents on the CCDI (Chronic Confusion and Dementing Illness) unit from resident to resident physical abuse from Resident #2. On 11/26/23 during the lunch meal Resident #2 pushed a table into Resident #3 who responded by throwing cooled coffee on Resident #2. Later that same shift Resident #2 verbally threatened Resident #3 that she was going to get her. The facility separated the residents but failed to implement any measures to prevent further aggression. At approximately 7:00 p.m. that same day, a staff person responded to a commotion in Resident #3's room. Resident #2 and #3 were both in the room. Resident #3 was on the floor with blood coming from her head, and reported Resident #2 pushed me and caused to hit her head. Both residents were agitated and the staff person was unable to redirect Resident #2 from the room. Staff left the residents unattended and went to the nurse's station located in the middle of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff protected and prevented resident to resident abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident # 3), when Resident # 2 slapped Resident #1 while in the lounge area. Resident #2 had a known history of resident to resident altercations and history of hitting staff, and the facility failed to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions implemented to prevent harm to other residents. The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #2 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 3, indicating severe cognitive deficits. The MDS included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, and depression. The MDS documented during the look back period the resident had both physical behaviors symptoms directed toward others, and other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others, and wandering that occurred 1 to 3 days. The MDS further documented the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to carry out safety interventions to prevent the likelihood of further abuse perpetrated by Resident #2 for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #'s 1 and #3); the facility failed to carry out interventions to prevent a fall with a major injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a fall (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #2 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive deficits. The MDS included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, and depression. The MDS documented during the look back period the resident had both physical behaviors symptoms directed toward others and other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others that occurred 1 to 3 days. The MDS further documented the resident behaviors of wandering that occurred 1 to 3 days. It documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate documentation of an ENT (Ear, Nose and Throat) referral for 1 of 3 residents' records reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings Include: Review of Resident #1 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented Brief Interview for Mental Status score (BIMS) of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Documented diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, Depression, Bipolar Disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and behaviors including hallucinations and delusions. Review of an Emergency Department After Visit Summary dated 8/27/25 revealed Resident #1 was seen for a fall that resulted in a nasal fracture. Discharge instructions stated Resident #1 to be re-evaluated in the next week by ENT for nasal fracture. Review of Resident #1's Electronic Health Records failed to provide documentation of communication or referral to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to initiate nursing assessments of a surgical amputation site in a timely manner for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for surgical sites (Resident #39). The facility reported a census of 74. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, completed on 7/14/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14, which indicated intact cognition for Resident #39. Diagnoses listed on the MDS include presence of an above the knee amputation and hypertension. Pain was assessed as moderate. The After Visit Summary from Resident #39's hospitalization from 6/26/25 -7/8/25 indicated an above the knee amputation occurred. Discharge instructions listed a follow-up appointment with Vascular Surgery on 8/12/25. The admission Skin Assessment completed on 7/8/25 noted a left leg amputation incision. No Physician Orders identified regarding cares to the surgical site. The Baseline Care Plan initiated on 7/8/25 listed an incision site to Resident's #39's left knee. The Comprehensive Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to flush an enteral gastrostomy tube (g-tube)(tube surgically inserted into the stomach to provide nutrition and medication) per the physician order prior to administering medication thru the gastrostomy tube for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 74 residents. Findings include: A Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #7 dated 7/3/25, included diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). The MDS revealed the resident had a g-tube. Observation on 7/22/25 at 9:50 AM, Staff A, Registered Nurse placed crushed medications and liquid medications into a cup and added 30 milliliters (ml.) of water to the medications. Staff A proceeded to administer the cup of medications mixed with water to Resident #7 thru her g-tube, and then administered 30 ml. of water into the g-tube. Clinical Physician Orders for Resident #7 documented an order with start date of 7/22/25 for 30 ml of water before medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices and Enhanced Barrier Practices (EBP) during urinary catheter care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #66). The facility reported a census of 74residents. Findings Include:Resident #66's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/29/25, reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS listed Resident #66 had an indwelling urinary catheter. The MDS included diagnoses of other neurological conditions, benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate) with lower urinary tract symptoms and retention of urine. The Care Plan with a target date of 9/3/25 included the following Focuses and Interventions:a. Resident #66 had an SP catheter (suprapubic) and a history of urinary tract infection (UTI). The intervention directed staff to change catheter bag twice a month and PRN, monitor output every shift.b. Resident is at risk of colonization at Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for resident to resident altercations (Resident #5, #6, #11, #13). On 7/20/24, Resident #4 scratched Resident #13. On 11/22/24, Resident #4 hit Resident #5 in the hand with an empty plastic pop bottle and shortly after hit Resident #6 in the back. On 2/4/25, Resident #4 hit Resident #11 on the head and shoulder and kicked her knees. The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 10/10/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #4 which included non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, and depression. The MDS stated the resident had verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others (e.g., threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others) for 1-3 days out of the 7 day review period and listed a Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 11 out of 15,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain hot holding temperatures above 135 degrees Fahrenheit for 1 of 1 meal observed. The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include: On 2/12/25 at 11:09 a.m., the Dietary Services Manager placed plated food into two warming carts. When she completed filling the first cart, Staff B Dietary Aide took the cart to the Chronic Confusion Dementing Illness (CCDI) unit. At 11:19 a.m., she finished filling the last cart and the State Agency (SA) requested she place a test tray and a thermometer on the last warming cart. At 11:21 a.m., Staff B took the second cart to the CCDI unit. At 11:24 a.m., staff in the CCDI unit began to pass out trays to the resident. At 11:43 a.m., Staff C Restorative Aide stated they passed all of the trays with the exception of a few residents who were not in the dining room yet. The SA immediately obtained the following temperatures on the test tray: mixed vegetables 115 degrees Fahrenheit and tuna casserole 128 degrees Fahrenheit. The SA tasted the tuna…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement resident centered care plan interventions to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for resident to resident altercations (Resident #5, #6, #11, #13). The facility continued to use the intervention of resident separation, and implimentation of 15-minute checks, with additional follow up intervention. On 7/20/24, Resident #4 scratched Resident #13. On 11/22/24, Resident #4 hit Resident #5 in the hand with an empty plastic pop bottle and shortly after hit Resident #6 in the back. On 2/4/25, Resident #4 hit Resident #11 on the head and shoulder and kicked her knees. The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 10/10/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #4 which included non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, and depression. The MDS stated the resident had verbal behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for a genetic testing referral for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a physician's orders(Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 6/20/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #2 which included non-Alzheimer's dementia, seizure disorder, and diabetes. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. A 7/31/24 clinic Patient Encounter Form stated the resident had newly diagnosed breast cancer. The form listed a referral to genetic testing for history of ovarian cancer and now breast cancer with an extensive family history. The facility lacked documentation the resident completed genetic testing and lacked information regarding the resident's appointments and a reason she did not attend. On 2/11/25 at 10:06 a.m., Staff A Cancer Center representative stated Resident #2 had an appointment scheduled for genetic testing on 9/4/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, resident, family, and staff interviews, the facility failed to respect each resident's dignity throughout all cares provided or talk to residents with dignity and respect. The facility reported a census of 71. Findings include: 1. A direct observation on 08/19/24 at 11:30 AM revealed Staff K, Certified Medication Aide (CMA), on her cell phone at this time. From a period lasting from 11:30 AM until 11:42 AM Staff K remained on her phone while residents were seated and began to eat in the dining room. A direct observation on 08/19/24 at 12:06 PM revealed Staff K, CMA, return to her phone for a period lasting until 12:15 PM. During the observation a resident was observed needing comfort because she was afraid she did not have enough money to pay for lunch. Another staff member intervened. Staff K finally put her phone down when a resident spilled a portion of her lunch on the floor and attempted to clean it herself, at which point Staff K put her phone away and assisted other staff members in intervening. A direct observation on 08/20/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The facility identified a census of 71 residents. Findings include: Observations revealed the following: On 08/19/24 at 8:50 AM: a. A wooden pallet laid on the floor in the common area and smaller dining room across from the Station 2 nurse's station. The wooden pallet had boxes of flooring on it. b. The baseboard heaters on the 200 hall by the exit door had metal flaps that were bent up and torn away from the heater. c. The walls in the 100-400 hallways had missing baseboards (trim). d. A clear plastic bag of garbage contained a soiled brief, paper towels, and gloves, and a large black garbage bag laid on the floor by the doorway in room [ROOM NUMBER]. e. Soiled washcloths lying on the floor by the door in room [ROOM NUMBER]. A sign on the wall revealed the resident on enhanced barrier precautions. At 10:25 AM, the wooden pallet laid on the floor (between 2 recliner chairs)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on direct observation, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to appropriately supervise and have interventions in place to ensure the resident's individual safety in the Chronic confusion and dementing illnesses (CCDI) unit. The facility reported a census of 28 in the CCDI unit and a total census of 71. Findings include: In a confidential interview on 08/19/24 at 10:42 AM with a resident Family Member A, they stated they felt they had to take over many of the cares their family member received because the facility staff had a pattern of ignoring their loved ones needs. They stated they were performing several of their family members activities of daily living after discovering their family member soiled with dried feces on them. In a confidential interview on 08/19/24 02:22 PM with Resident Family Member B, they stated their loved one had been found on multiple occasions heavily soiled with dried feces on their body. They stated staff members often told them the resident had refused all cares, and had not showered in weeks as a result. A continuous direct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to utilize infection control techniques in order to prevent cross contamination for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for catheter care, treatments, and dressing changes (Resident #6 and #28). The facility also failed to ensure staff changed gloves and performed hand hygiene when contaminated for two of three residents observed. The staff failed to utilize a barrier and disinfect contaminated equipment and surfaces after use for 1 of 3 units observed. The facility staff also failed to don personal protective equipment on a resident on enhanced barrier precautions prior to catheter care for 1 of 3 units observed. The facility also failed to provide peri-care in a manner to prevent cross-contamination and infection for 1 of 3 residents observed for peri-care. The facility also failed to disinfect resident care devices when soiled for 2 of 3 residents observed during incontinence/catheter cares (Resident #6 and #41). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide the resident/resident representative notice of the bed hold policy at the time of transfer for hospitalization for two (Residents # 36 and #43) of three residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 71 residents. Findings include: 1.A Minimum Data Set for Resident #36 dated 6/6/24, included diagnoses of heart failure and diabetes. A Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 indicated no cognitive impairment for decision-making. Review of resident's progress notes documented the resident was admitted to the hospital 5/26/24 and returned to the facility 6/3/24. Review of resident's clinical record lacked documentation of notification to the resident/ resident's representative regarding the bed-hold policy when transferred to the hospital. 2. Minimum Data Set for Resident #43 dated 8/8/24, included diagnoses of diabetes and cancer. A Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 indicated no cognitive impairment for decision-making. Review of resident's progress notes documented the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a Baseline Care Plan that included anticoagulant (blood thinner), antipsychotic, and antidepressant medications and monitoring for one (Resident #76) of three residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 71 residents. Findings include: A Minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #76, included diagnoses of heart failure, anxiety disorder, and mood disorder. Review of resident's order summary report dated 8/21/24, listed the following medications: 1. Apixaban (anticoagulant) 5 milligrams (mg)- 2 times daily. 2. Duloxetine(antidepressant) 40 mg. in the morning and 60 mg. at bedtime. 3. Risperdal (antipsychotic) 1 mg.- 2 times a day. Review of resident's Baseline Care Plan, dated 8/8/24, lacked documentation of the anticoagulant, antidepressant, and antipsychotic medications. Interview on 8/22/24 at 10:27 AM, the Director of Nursing stated expectation for the medications to be included in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, resident, family, and staff interviews, the facility failed to appropriately provide assessment and interventions for the necessary care and services, to maintain the residents' highest practical physical well-being. Clinical record review revealed the nursing staff failed to provide thorough assessment, did not contact the resident's physician in a timely manner or provide treatment for 1 of 18 residents reviewed. (Resident#61). Findings include: The Minimum Data Sample (MDS) for Resident #61, dated 06/27/24, documented a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of 99, indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. The MDS documented relevant diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder. The Care Plan, last updated on 07/15/2024, documented Resident #61 is dependent on staff to meet her emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs. Review of a health status note dated 07/22/2024 documented a phone call between a resident family member and Staff M, Registered Nurse (RN), in which the family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interview, competency checklist, and a mechanical lift manufacturer user instruction manual, the facility staff failed to utilize safe transfer technique when they used a mechanical lift (Hoyer) transfer device for 1 of 3 residents observed for transfers and required a mechanical lift for transfers (Resident #23). The facility also failed to ensure adequate ventilation and temperature controls in a room that contained servers and electronic devices. The facility also failed to ensure bathroom call lights accessible for residents and staff for 1 of 3 units observed. The facility reported a census 71 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had diagnoses of dementia, muscle weakness, and anxiety. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented the resident had dependence on staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, and the facility policy review, the facility staff failed to provide complete incontinence care for one of three residents reviewed (Resident #23). The facility reported a census of 71 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had diagnoses of dementia. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented the resident had incontinence, and had dependence on staff for toileting hygiene. The Care Plan revised 2/8/24 revealed the resident had a self-care deficit in activities of daily living and had incontinence. The resident required maximum assistance for bed mobility and dressing. The care plan directed staff to clean the peri-area after each incontinence episode. During observation on 08/20/24 at 07:44 AM, Resident #23 [NAME] in bed while Staff C, certified nursing assistant (CNA),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to assure a medication error rate of less than 5%. During observation of medication administration, the facility had 5 errors out of 37 opportunities for error resulting in an error rate of 13.51% (Residents #69). The facility identified a census of 71 residents Findings include: During observation on 08/20/24 at 3:28 PM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), checked the electronic health record (EHR) and obtained a Styrofoam cup with hot water. Staff A reported the hot water would help dissolve the pills better. Staff A prepared the following medication for Resident #69: 1. Amantadine (anti-seizure/tremor medication) 15 milliliters (ml) 2. Docusate sodium (stool softener) 30 ml 3. Atorvastatin (for cholesterol)10 milligrams (mg) 4. Eliquis (blood thinner) 5 mg 5. Metoprolol (for blood pressure) 25 mg Staff A crushed the pills (atorvastatin, eliquis, and metoprolol) and placed them into the liquid medication and warm water mixture in the Styrofoam cup. Staff A then stirred the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders and administer medications as ordered. Facility staff administered medications through a gastrostomy tube instead of by mouth as ordered for 1 of 7 residents observed during medication administration. The facility reported a census of 71 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 had diagnoses of stroke, non-Alzheimer's dementia, seizure disorder, and dysphagia. The MDS documented the resident had impaired short-term and long-term memory and severely impaired decision making skills. The MDS indicated the resident on a mechanically altered diet and had a tube feeding. The Care Plan revised 5/3/24 revealed the resident had a Peg tube placed during hospitalization. The care plan directed staff to administer medications as ordered. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 8/1/24 to 8/31/24, revealed Staff A, Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to hold a medication as directed per the physicians orders for which caused a resident to reschedule an appointment for 1 or 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Finding include: 1. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1, with an assessment reference dated 2/21/24, documented diagnosis for which included hypertension, anxiety, depression and psychotic disorder. The MDS revealed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, for which indicated no impairments with decision making or memory problems. The MDS documented the resident had adequate hearing and is able to make self understood and had the ability to understand others. The MDS documented the resident required partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene. An After Visit Summary Dated 2/15/24, documented next appointment on 4/4/24 at 9:30 a.m., and you will need to stop the following medications 48 hours prior to your appointment, Tramadol (pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to provide two baths a week as directed for 2 out of 4 residents reviewed (#1 and #4). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: 1. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1, with an assessment reference dated 2/21/24, documented diagnosis for which included hypertension, anxiety, depression and psychotic disorder. The MDS revealed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, for which indicated no impairments with decision making or memory problems, had adequate hearing, and was able to make self understood, and had the ability to understand others. The MDS documented that the resident required partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene and showers/bathing activity. Review of electronic documentation of task completion for Resident #1 revealed the facility failed to provide baths between April 8, 2024 and April 15th, 2024. In an interview on 4/23/23 at 9:50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to have 1 of 3 residents seen at least once every 60 days by the physician. (Resident #1) The facility census was 78 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1, with an assessment reference dated 2/21/24, documented diagnosis for which included hypertension, anxiety, depression and psychotic disorder. The MDS revealed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, for which indicated no impairments with decision making or memory problems, and had adequate hearing, and was able to make self understood The MDS documented the resident had the ability to understand others, and required partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene. The Clinical Record for Resident #1 documented that the Physician visited the patient on these dates: *10/26/23 (Behavioral Health visit) *3/11/24 (Physician Assistant visit) The clinical record lacked documentation of the primary care physician seeing the resident between 10/26/23 and 3/11/24. Interview on 4/25/24 at 1:22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to answer resident call lights in a timely manner (no longer than 15 minutes) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed . (Resident #1). The facility identified a census of 78 residents. Findings include: 1. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1, with an assessment reference dated 2/21/24, documented diagnosis for which included hypertension, anxiety, depression and psychotic disorder. The MDS revealed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, for which indicated no impairments with decision making or memory problems. The MDS documented the resident had adequate hearing and was able to make self understood, and had the ability to understand others The MDS indicated the resident required partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene and showers/bathing activity On 4/23/24 at 9:45 a.m., Resident #1 stated that it could take the staff over a half hour to answer the call light. During an interview on 4/22/24 at 3:15 p.m., Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) confirmed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to consistently answer call lights within a reasonable amount of time, under 15 minutes. Residents and staff reported having low staffing caused missed or delayed cares. The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #2 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented Resident #2 required dependence on one staff member for performing activities of daily living. During an interview on 2/26/24 at 10:40 AM Resident #2 stated he had to wait on average over 30 minutes for staff to answer his call light and between hours of 11 PM - 7 AM it's a lot longer, up to a few hours. 2. Record review of Resident #12 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented Resident #12 required dependence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect throughout cares provided for 3 of 9 residents reviewed (Resident #2, Resident #12, and Resident #14). The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #2 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented Resident #2 required dependence on one staff member for performing activities of daily living. During an interview on 2/26/24 at 10:40 AM Resident #2 stated his legs sometimes were in a lot of pain and he couldn't lift them up on his own when getting into his bed. He wasn't able to get into bed completely and would push a call light but on many occasions no one came to assist him so he would lay down in bed with his legs still on the floor. He said it made him feel less than a man. 2. Record review of Resident #12 Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, documentation review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within two (2) hours to the State Survey Agency related to mistreatment of 1 resident (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #12 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS listed diagnoses of seizure disorder or epilepsy, anxiety disorder, depression, and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The MDS documented Resident #12 required dependence on 1-2 staff members for performing most activities of daily living (ADLs). During an interview on 2/26/24 at 10:40 AM Resident #12 stated recently he felt a CNA was rough with him while providing hands-on assistance and it made his PTSD flare up, he felt scared and reported it to the Director of Nursing (DON). A review of the facility report submitted to the State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the clinical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with the assistance of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 4 out of 6 residents reviewed for baths/showers (Residents #31, #49, #56, and #61). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #31 entered the facility on 6/20/23. The MDS also documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 06, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #31 did not have functional abilities for transfers in/out of tub/shower and required a total assistance of two or more staff members. During an observation on 1/22/24 at 11:00 AM, Resident #31 appeared to have dull and greasy hair. Upon review of Resident #31's Electronic Health Record (EHR), the last documented bath/shower occurred on 12/28/23. The Progress Note in the EHR on 1/8/24 documented a shower attempted three times but was refused by the resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient number of staff to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for 4 out of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #31, #49, #56 and #61). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 1/22/24 at 11:00 AM, Resident #31 appeared to have dull and greasy hair. During a review of Resident #31's Electronic Health Record (EHR), the last documented bath occurred on 12/28/23. 2. During an observation on 1/23/24 at 3:00 PM, Resident #61 appeared to have dull and greasy hair. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #61 entered the facility on 12/1/23. The MDS also documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. In an interview with Resident #61 on 1/24/24 at 10:00 AM, she stated she hadn't been receiving showers per her preference due to low staffing. She revealed if the facility had enough staff then she would get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out Quality Assurance (QA) activities in order to address problem-prone areas and create a plan for improvement. The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 2567, dated 11/2/23, listed the following concerns: F550, F568, F607, F656, F657, F677, F684, F725. The untitled audit sheets related to the 11/2/23 survey revealed the following: F550 lacked documentation of an audit completed between 11/30/23 and 1/25/24. F568 was blank and lacked documentation of audits completed. F607 was blank with the exception of 2 yes entries but lacked documentation of an audit completed. F656 lacked documentation of an audit completed after 12/1/23. F657 lacked documentation of an audit completed after 12/1/23. F677 was blank and lacked documentation of audits completed. F684 lacked documentation of an audit completed after 12/4/23. F725 was blank and lacked documentation of audits completed. An Education Sheet documented a 12/21/23 QA meeting.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide quarterly financial statements for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for personal funds. (Residents #15, #35, and #36). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 12/15/23, listed Resident #15's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 1/23/24 at 9:35 a.m., Resident #15 stated he did not receive monthly financial statements from the facility but he wished he did. 2. The MDS assessment tool, dated 12/13/23, listed Resident #35's BIMS score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 1/22/24 at approximately 10:00 a.m., Resident #35 stated she did not receive monthly financial statements from the facility. 3. The MDS assessment tool, dated 1/19/24, listed Resident #36's BIMS score as 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 1/22/24 at approximately 10:10 a.m., Resident #36 stated she did not receive monthly financial statements from the facility. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee file review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a criminal background check to include a record check evaluation for 1 of 3 staff members reviewed (Staff A). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: The facility policy Nursing Facility Abuse Prevention, Identification, Investigation and Reporting Policy, updated 10/19/22, stated the facility would conduct criminal record checks for potential employees. A Record Check Evaluation, ran by a former facility and dated 3/28/23, stated Staff A may work. A Single Contact License and Background Check, dated 12/5/23, stated further research was required for the staff member's criminal history background check and directed to await the final response for criminal history. An untitled, undated facility document listed the hire date for Staff A Registered Nurse (RN) as 12/6/23. An Iowa Criminal History Misdemeanor Convictions Only document, dated 12/10/23, listed an 11/1/23 arrest for Staff A for theft in the third degree. The facility lacked documentation of an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic record reviews, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered Care Plan for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #19 and #61). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #61 entered the facility on 12/1/23. The MDS also documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented the functional abilities and goals for showers, toilet transfers, sit to stand, and chair/bed-to-chair transfers as requiring partial/moderate assistance of at least one staff member with lifting, holding or supporting with less than half the effort. The Care Plan initiated on 12/07/23 did not document Resident #61's current functional status, a minimum of one staff member needed to assist with showers, toilet use, or transfers. During an interview with the Resident on 1/23/24 at 3:30 p.m., she expressed she relied on staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences which included the resident and/or the resident's representative and the interdisciplinary team for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #66, #67, and #68). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool for Resident #66, dated 12/18/23, listed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 3 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. A 12/27/23 Care Conference Review contained multiple blank entries such as the date of the care conference review, attendees, nursing services information, and social services documentation. The form lacked documentation of an attempt to invite the resident's representative. 2. The MDS assessment tool for Resident #67, dated 12/29/23, listed a BIMS score as 4 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. A 1/3/24 Care Conference Review contained multiple blank entries such as the date of the care conference review, attendees, nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out a physician ordered intervention by failing to ensure the application of compression socks (used to prevent blood clots and aid in circulation) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for assessment and intervention (Resident #56). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 11/28/23, listed diagnoses for Resident #56 which included diabetes, coronary artery disease (a buildup in the arteries), and edema (swelling). The MDS stated the resident required supervision and touching assistance for lower body dressing and putting on and taking off footwear. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. An 11/5/21 Care Plan entry stated the resident had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to weakness and the need for assistance with personal cares. A 9/22/23 Order Details report listed an order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to protect residents on the CCDI (Chronic Confusion and Dementing Illness) unit from resident to resident physical abuse from Resident #2. The facility identified 31 other residents reside on the CCDI unit. Additionally, the facility failed to provide a safe mechanical lift transfer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility further failed to provide a safe environment on the CCDI unit allowing residents to exit the unit to a secured outdoor area without staff knowledge or consent due to the door alarm being deactivated. Findings include: 1. The MDS for Resident #2 dated 9/20/2023 documented severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented no hallucinations or delusions and no physical or verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others. The MDS also documented they wandered 1-3 days of the week during the observation period. The MDS documented the resident independent for bed mobility, transfer, toilet use, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to have sufficient staff to protect residents on the CCDI (Chronic Confusion and Dementing Illness) unit from resident to resident physical abuse from Resident #2. Staff left the residents unattended and went to the nurse's station located in the middle of the unit to get help because there was no call light available in the room to summon help, no nurse was on the unit, and the CMA and the other CNA were in the enclosed nurses station and couldn't hear her calling for help. The facility identified 31 other residents reside on the CCDI unit. Additionally, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to provide a safe mechanical lift transfer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 10/13/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS further documented the resident dependent for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, staff posting sheets, nursing staff schedules, and the Facility Assessment, the facility failed to have a sufficient number of nursing staff on duty on a 24 hour basis to adequately and safely meet the residents' needs. Findings include: 1. On 10/23/23 at 12:10 PM, the Administrator stated the facility has no current Director of Nursing. On 10/24/23, lunch service was observed. The facility document titled Meal Times states lunch service is from 11:00-12:00 in the main dining room and meal service for the Station 2 cart begins at 11:15 am. The following observations were made on 10/24/23: 12:10 PM the second meal cart for Station 2 was ready to go to the floor but the first meal cart had not yet been returned to the kitchen. At 12:18 PM Staff I, CMA came to the dining room and stated that there is not enough staff to serve and meal service had just begun a few minutes earlier. 12:22 PM: The second meal cart was taken to Station 2 by Staff L, cook, but the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee interviews and facility documentation, the facility failed to have full time Registered Nurse Director of Nursing. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: The employee roster provided by the facility listed the Nursing Management team to include the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN); the Quality Assurance/Infection Control nurse, LPN and the MDS Coordinator, Registered Nurse (RN). On 10/23/23 at 12:10 PM, the Administrator stated the facility has no current Director of Nursing (DON). She stated the facility has three nurse managers who have been designated to split the tasks of the DON. On 10/25/23 at 12:36 PM, the MDS Coordinator, RN stated she was a DON at a former facility and she helps out as much as possible with DON duties at this facility. She stated she felt burned out from several years of being a DON and does not want the position of DON at this facility. She reiterated she has been willing to share her knowledge but she is not an interim DON and her title is MDS Coordinator. On 10/26/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, resident council notes, and facility policy review, the facility failed to address issues brought forward from the Resident Council. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #49 dated 9/23/23 identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated cognition intact. The MDS of Resident #53 dated dated 10/13/23 identified a BIMS score of 15 which indicated cognition intact. The MDS of Resident #56 dated 8/28/23 identified a BIMS score of 14 which indicated cognition intact. The MDS of Resident #57 dated 10/4/23 identified a BIMS score of 15 which indicated cognition intact. On 10/25/23 at 10:03 AM, the State Surveyor met as a group with Residents #49, #53, #56 and #57, all active members of the Resident Council. Resident #56 was identified as President of the Resident Council. Resident #56 stated the night shift Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) do not answer call lights. He stated he has witnessed the CNAs sitting with their backs turned so they cannot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and resident [NAME] of Rights, the facility failed to facilitate the residents receiving unopened mail delivered to the facility. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: On 10/25/23 at 10:28 am, Resident #56 stated at times the mail is already opened when it is delivered to the residents. On 10/25/23 at 10:29 am, the Activities Director stated at times when she is given the mail to distribute to residents, it is already opened. She stated the mail first goes to the Business Office Manger and it is then given to her to pass on to the residents. She stated she had delivered mail earlier in the day on 10/25/23 and some of it was already opened. On 10/25/23 at 11:03 am, the Business Office Manager (BOM) stated that all personal mail is delivered to all of the residents and all mail is delivered to the cognitively aware residents. She remarked if the resident is not cognitively aware, she just deals with it. She stated mail such as benefits statements from insurance companies, described as mail that states This is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe and homelike environment by failing to exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for missing belongings (Resident #49, #15, #31, & #284) and failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment during remodeling of the facility. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. On 10/23/23 Resident #49 stated she was missing two pair of pants (one black with brown and white stripes; one blue with lavender and white stripes) and a T-shirt since July 2023. She stated the housekeeping manager was not able to locate them. Resident #15 stated he was missing two black T-shirts with designs that had not been located. On 10/30/23 at 11:43 AM, Staff W, laundry personnel stated the process for personal item identification is residents are asked upon admission if the facility will be laundering the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee file review, communication from facility staff, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 6 staff members (Staff E) completed the two hour Dependent Adult Abuse training within 6 months of hire date. The facility further failed to complete a Single Contact Repository (SING) background check prior to hire for 1 of 6 staff members (Staff C). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of employee file of Staff E, housekeeper, revealed a hire date of 6/22/22. The file lacked documentation of an Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH) approved Dependent Adult Abuse (DAA) Mandatory Reporter training certificate. On 10/26/23 at 12:53 PM the Administrator provided a DAA training certificate for Staff E dated 10/26/23. 2. Review of employee file of Staff C, Certified Nurse Aide, revealed a hire date of 4/12/23. Staff C was a rehire from previous employment at the facility in 2021. Staff C's employee file lacked documentation of a SING background check for the current hire date. On 10/25/23 at 12:58 PM, via email, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive Care Plans for 5 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident #19, #31, #49, #52 and #77). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had diagnoses of bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, anxiety disorder, and depression. The Care Plan revised on 7/28/21 revealed the resident had impaired thought processes as exhibited by diagnoses of bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, and delusional disorder. The staff directives included to administer psychotropic medications as ordered and monitor for medications side effects. The order summary report revealed a STAT (immediate) order on 5/27/23 to send the resident to the hospital for psychiatric evaluation due to suicidal thoughts. The Progress Notes dated 5/27/23 at 6:07 PM, revealed the resident had thoughts of harming herself and ending her life, and wanted to die.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate frequency of baths/showers per the residents preference for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for baths/showers (Residents #15, #35, #49, #87, and #284). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool dated 6/10/23 revealed Resident #87 had diagnoses of diabetes and urinary tract infections. The MDS documented the resident had required assistance of one staff for bathing. The MDS documented choosing the type of bath or shower was very important to her. The Care Plan revised on 5/8/23 revealed the resident had an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care deficit related to impaired mobility and functional abilities. The staff directives included assistance of one for bathing, and bathing encouraged twice a week and as necessary. The electronic health record included a weekly wound observation tool dated 8/30/23 but no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to secure medications in a locked medication cart for two of four medication carts. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. On 10/24/23 at 4:00 PM, an unlocked medication cart sat in the middle of the 200 hall between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], with no staff observed in the area. The medication cart drawers had multiple resident medications, including antipsychotic medications, heart medication, blood pressure medications, etc. The top drawer of the medication cart had multiple medication cups stacked inside of each other and each medication cup had pills in various colors, shapes, and sizes, with a number and letter A or B listed on them. The computer on top of the medication cart was open and had resident pictures, names, and room numbers listed on the screen, giving access to resident medical record information. On 10.24.23 at 4:10 PM Staff F, certified medication aide (CMA), reported he was assigned to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0917 — patternMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to provide functional furniture appropriate to the residents needs for 11 out of 32 rooms reviewed. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 10/23/23 at 11:40 AM of the CCDI (Chronic Confusion or Dementing Illness) unit, 11 out of 32 resident rooms were not furnished with functional furniture, to include bedside storage tables, chairs, and a place to store clothing in an organized manner, reachable by residents. Some rooms had socks and smaller clothing items stored in paper boxes under the sink and some closets had clothing stored directly on the floor. During an interview with the Administrator on 10/25/23 at 10:57 AM, she stated resident rooms in the CCDI unit were furnished with a bed and a TV upon admission and if the facility had any donated furniture then they would make it available upon request. She further stated that all other resident rooms in the facility were furnished with a bed and a bedside table with storage shelves. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to adequately equip residents with a communication system to call for assistance from a bedside and from toilet and bathing facility for 32 residents in the facility. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 10/23/23 at 10:41 AM of the CCDI (Chronic Confusion or Dementing Illness) unit, 32 resident rooms, including private bathrooms and the main shower room, did not have a communication/call system available to call for assistance. During a family member interview on 10/25/23 at 12:45 PM, a concern was brought up in regards to no call light system available for their mother to use who was still independent with toilet use. During an interview with another family member on 10/25/23 at 04:54 PM, the family member was concerned about his mother not being able to call for help with her history of falls. He stated that she would use it if she was provided a call light. During an interview with the Administrator on 10/25/23 at 10:57 AM, she stated that floor staff made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident observations, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide residents with facial cleaning after meals for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: On 10/23/23 at 1:48 PM, Resident #1 was observed with a red substance around her mouth. She stated it was the sauce from lunch. The tray had already been picked up. She stated she asked staff to clean it and no one came back. The resident stated she didn't like sitting in her room with food sauce on her mouth. The residents quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 99, indicating the resident was not able to complete the interview. It also listed diagnoses of heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, psychotic disorder, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, and paraplegia. The MDS revealed the resident required one-person, limited assistance with personal hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain Medicaid funded Resident Trust Fund (RTF) amounts exceeding $50 in an interest-bearing account. The facility also failed to secure RTF money held at the facility for 19 residents. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: On 10/24/23, an Interview with Residents #15, #35, and #36 indicated the residents did not receive a statement of funds or a receipt of earned interest for their Medicaid funded RTF accounts. On 10/31/23 at 4:25 PM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) stated there were no resident RTF funds held in an interest-bearing account. There were no interest statements available. On 11/01/23 at 9:17 AM, the BOM stated there were 19 residents in the facility who had RTF accounts. On 11/01/23 at 8:55 AM, the BOM's office door was observed opened with no staff present within view. The cabinet where RTF funds were kept had keys hanging out of the locking mechanism. The mechanism was noted to be unlocked position (extended). Between 8:55 AM and 9:17 AM, five…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide individual financial records through quarterly statements for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #15, #35, and #36). The facility identified a census of 81 residents. Findings include: On 10/24/23, an Interview with Residents #15, #35, and #36 indicated the residents did not receive a statement of funds for their Medicaid funded Resident Trust Fund (RTF) accounts. On 10/25/23 at 10:45 AM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) stated she mailed or hand delivered the RTF statements to the residents every quarter or upon request but residents did not sign for receipt. She stated the RTF statements were tracked on a spreadsheet but admitted it had not been updated in a couple of months. On 10/31/23 at 4:25 PM, the BOM stated there were no resident RTF funds held in an interest-bearing account. There were no interest statements available. On 11/01/23 at 9:17 AM, the BOM stated there were 19 residents in the facility who had RTF accounts. On 11/01/23 at 1:36 PM, the Administrator stated account statements were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 19 resident's reviewed in the sample (Residents #52). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 had a diagnosis of COVID-19. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed oxygen not marked under section O /special treatments. The Progress Notes revealed: a. On 9/26/23 at 2:16 PM resident on oxygen at 2 liters per nasal canula (NC), and started on an antibiotic for bronchitis. b. On 9/28/23 at 4:11 PM, the resident remained on oxygen due to oxygen saturation dropped to 88% on room air. c. On 9/29/23 at 5:44 AM the resident complained of shortness of breath. Oxygen increased from 1.5 to 2 liters for comfort. Observations revealed the following: a. On 10/23/23 at 12:30 PM, the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to involve the resident and resident's representative in care conferences, and in making decisions about his or her plan of care and care plan development for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for care conferences (Resident #31). Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of non-traumatic brain dysfunction, cognitive communication deficit, and dementia. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS indicated the resident deemed having family involved in a discussion about her care as very important. The baseline Care Plan dated 6/20/23 revealed the resident's daily preferences for family or significant other involvement in her care discussions. A care conference review document dated 10/17/23 had only notes listed from dietary,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to properly discharge a resident by failing to provide a 30-day discharge notice and necessary discharge paperwork for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (#49). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: The Progress Notes and Electronic Health Record (EHR) uploaded files indicated Resident #49 was not offered a bed-hold prior to or within 24 hours after she transferred from the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. It also listed diagnoses of Cerebrovascular Accident (stroke) and depression. The Electronic Health Record's (EHR) clinical census report (payor source) indicated the resident was billed as Medicaid and was listed as hospital unpaid leave status while she was in the hospital between [DATE] and [DATE]. The census report also revealed the resident's billing stopped on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, speech therapy recommendations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow speech therapy recommendations for a resident who had dysphagia for 1 of 7 residents reviewed (Resident #44). The facility also failed to obtain daily weights and notify the physician as ordered when a resident had a weight gain greater than 3 pounds in a day or 5 pounds in a week for 1 of 7 residents reviewed, and also failed to complete follow up skin assessments for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for a skin condition (Resident #87). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 had diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident and aphasia. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers, and supervision of one for eating. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide proper incontinence care to minimize the risk of cross-contamination and prevent the risk and occurrence of a urinary tract infection for 3 and 3 residents observed for incontinence care (Resident #31, #52, and #1). Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had diagnoses of a non-traumatic brain dysfunction, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), and dementia. The MDS documented the resident had a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS indicated the resident had incontinence and required substantial to maximum assistance for toilet transfer and dependent for toileting hygiene. The Care Plan initiated and revised on 10/25/23 revealed the resident had an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit related to dementia and impaired cognition. The Care Plan directed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to ensure a physician's order for oxygen use and failed to ensure oxygen equipment maintained for one of two residents reviewed for oxygen use (Resident #52). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 had a history of COVID-19. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed oxygen not marked under section O /special treatments. The Care Plan revealed the resident had oxygen therapy related to a respiratory illness added to the Care Plan on 10/23/23 (during the survey week). The order summary revealed a verbal order entered on 10/23/23 (during the survey week) for oxygen at 1-3 liters per nasal canula as needed, and change oxygen tubing every Sunday on the night shift. The Progress Notes revealed: a. On 9/26/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to assure a medication error rate of less than 5%. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: During observation on 10/24/23 medication pass was observed for a total of 5 residents, including Resident #26, Resident #28, and Resident #33. A total of 36 medications were observed being administered. Four errors were observed, calculating a medication error rate of 11.11%. Resident #33 was given her morning medications by Staff I, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) at 8:08 AM. She received a total of 11 oral medications. Two of those medications, Amlodipine 10 mg, and Lisinopril 40 mg (both are blood pressure pills) had instructions to hold the medication if the resident had a systolic blood pressure of less than 100 mm Hg (millimeters of mercury) or a heart rate of less than 55 beats per minute. Staff I did not assess the blood pressure or the heart rate of of Resident #33 prior to administering either of the medications. Resident #28 was given his morning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to assure residents in the facility to be free of significant medication errors. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: During observation on 10/24/23 medication pass was observed for Resident #33. Resident #33 was given her morning medications by Staff I, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) at 8:08 AM. She received a total of 11 oral medications. Two of those medications, Amlodipine 10 mg, and Lisinopril 40 mg (both are blood pressure pills) had instructions to hold the medication if the resident had a systolic blood pressure of less than 100 mm Hg (millimeters of mercury) or a heart rate of less than 55 beats per minute. Staff I did not assess the blood pressure or the heart rate of Resident #33 prior to administering the medication. Review of Resident #33's Blood Pressure Summary and Pulse Summary revealed her blood pressure and pulse had been checked twice in August of 2023, twice in September of 2023, and as of the observation date of 10/24/23, her blood pressure had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to change gloves and sanitize hands during cares, and failed to provide a sanitary environment and maintain infection control practices to prevent the potential spread of infection or disease for 3 of 19 residents sampled (Resident #52, #6, #35). The facility also failed to properly disinfect a glucometer after resident use for 1 of 2 observations. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings included: 1. During an observation on 10/24/23 11:17 AM, Staff A, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) completed a blood glucose check for 1 resident and returned the glucometer (blood glucose monitor) to the medication storage cart. During an interview with Staff A, CMA, she revealed she used alcohol pads for disinfecting the glucometer. During an interview with Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), she confirmed alcohol pads were used to disinfect the glucometer which was shared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-11-02 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted daily with current date, resident census, and staffing hours. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: On 10/24/23 at 2:30 PM, the staff posting displayed in the lobby of the facility was dated 10/22/23. On 10/25/23 at 8:10 AM, the staff posting displayed in the lobby remained for the date of 10/22/23. On 10/25/23 at 11:12 AM, the Administrator stated the daily posting is completed by Staff D, Scheduler. The Administrator further stated the current staff posting was in the scheduler's office and she is aware they are to be posted daily with current census and staff. On 10/26/23 at 10:39 AM, the staff posting displayed in the lobby of the facility was dated 10/25/23. On 10/26/23 at 12:53 PM, the Administrator stated the scheduler comes in 7 days a week to complete the staff posting.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide notice to the resident and/or representative of the facility's bed-hold policy prior to and upon transfer to the hospital for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for transfers to the hospital or another facility (Resident #87, #15, #24, and #49). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. The discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #87 had diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, chronic kidney disease-Stage 4, heart failure, and a history of COVID-19. The MDS revealed the resident had an unplanned discharge to the hospital on 9/21/23. The census list revealed Resident #87 had an unpaid hospital leave 9/21/23, and billing stopped on 10/1/23. The Progress Notes dated 9/21/23 at 9:10 AM revealed resident was sent to the Emergency Department. An expiration of bed-hold notice for Resident #87 revealed the bed-hold began on 9/21/23. The notice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-11-02 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments reviewed for not being submitted to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in 120 days (Resident #43). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: Record review of Resident #43 MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/22/23 documented the Assessment being completed correctly. Record review of the facilities Electronic Health Record (EHR) Assessment History for Resident #43 MDS with an ARD date of 9/22/23 revealed the facility never added the assessment to a batch to be submitted to CMS. During an interview on 10/26/23 at 11:30 AM with the MDS Coordinator revealed she was told not to submit Private Pay resident assessments to CMS.
- No harm found · B2023-11-02 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed and transmitted within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: Record review of the MDS for Resident #9 documented an ARD date of 4/28/2023. The MDS then documented a completion date of 5/31/23, revealing the date from 4/28/23 to 5/31/23 is greater than 14 days. During an interview on 10/26/23 at 11:30 AM the MDS Coordinator revealed she would have expected the MDS to be completed within 14 days from the ARD date. She also revealed she did not work at the facility at this time. She then informed the facility should follow the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) guidance for completing MDS assessments.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$52,632 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $30,675 — penalty dated 2024-04-25
- $21,957 — penalty dated 2023-11-02
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-24 for 30 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-19 for 28 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $44K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165273. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.