Ramsey Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 31.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 68.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to appropriately provide assessments and interventions for necessary care and services for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Clinical record review revealed the Assistant Director of Nursing notified the nursing staff of a wound on Resident #1's left foot after admission. The nurse failed to conduct an assessment and failed to notify the provider to acquire an intervention for 48 days after admission. The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented that Resident #1 admitted to on 9/23/25 from Home/Community (e.g., assisted living). This MDS documented that Resident #1's diagnoses included diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, functional quadriplegia (the complete inability to move due to severe disability or frailty caused by another medical condition without damage to the spinal cord), bipolar disorder, and polyneuropathy (nerve damage that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, pharmacy record review and policy review, the facility failed to follow professional standards regarding following physician's orders by failing to remove previously applied fentanyl patches after 72 hours of use and before applying new patches, putting residents at risk of an overdose for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration. The facility reported a census of 69 residents. Findings include:Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed, Resident #1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, indicating cognitively intact. Resident #1's diagnoses include coronary artery disease, respiratory failure with hypoxia, history of polio resulting in chronic pain, muscle wasting and atrophy, anxiety, depression, and PTSD with dependence of two for assistance with a mechanical lift for ambulation and use of wheelchair for mobility. Resident #1's MDS included antipsychotics, antidepressants, diuretic, opioid and anticonvulsant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure mechanical lifts were used correctly during transfers for 3 of 5 residents (#1, #4, #5). The facility failed to lock wheelchairs during resident transfers for 2 of 5 residents (#2, #4), and failed to ensure foot pedals were attached while transporting a resident in a wheelchair for 1 of 5 residents (#3). The facility reported a census of 69 residents.Findings include:. 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 9/29/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of end-stage renal disease, Alzheimer's Disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia, lack of coordination, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. It indicated she was independent with eating, required setup assistance with oral hygiene, maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, upper body dressing, and all mobility except lying to sitting on the side of the bed, and was dependent with lower body dressing, footwear,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide repositioning and incontinence care for 1 of 3 residents (#6). The facility reported a census of 69 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #6 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of renal (kidney) disease, Alzheimer's Disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia, disorder of kidney and ureter, and need for assistance with personal care. The MDS documented that the resident required supervision with eating, maximal assistance with oral and personal hygiene, bathing, upper body dressing, and rolling left and right in bed, and was dependent with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and mobility. The MDS also indicated he was always incontinent of bowel and bladder.The Care Plan dated 12/15/22 and revised 8/28/24 documented the following; the resident had bladder incontinence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to disinfect a mechanical lift after use between 2 of 2 residents, failed to perform hand hygiene during perineal care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (#4), and failed to remove Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) before leaving a resident's room who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The facility reported a census of 69 residents. Findings include:1. On 10/22/25 at 2:56 PM, Staff A, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) and Staff E, CNA used a mechanical lift in a resident's room to transfer him from his wheelchair to his bed. After they completed the transfer, Staff E pushed the mechanical lift into the hallway and returned to the resident's room. The mechanical lift was not sanitized.At 3:16 PM, Staff F, Certified Medication Aide (CMA), took the mechanical lift into Resident #4's room to transfer him from his bed to his wheelchair and did not sanitize it. Staff F positioned the lift near Resident #4's bed and Staff F and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and facility policy review the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for one of one resident reviwed (Resident #4), and failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene during personal cares for three of three residents observed for toileting hygiene (Res #3, Res #4 and Res #61). The facility additionally failed to properly sanitize a full body mechanical lift between the usage of the lift between two residents. The facility reported a census of 62 residents. Findings include: 1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #4 dated 6/14/25 recorded the resident to require substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene. The Care Plan of Resident #4 documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter, dated 6/10/25. Observation of transfer, toileting, and catheter care began on 8/27/25 at 10:13 am with Staff E and Staff I, Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) present. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic health record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of blood sugars <60 for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for insulin use (Resident #22). The facility reported a census of 62. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 5/24/25, revealed Resident #22 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 2, indicated severe cognitive impairment. Diagnoses on the MDS include diabetes, stroke, seizure disorder, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Medications listed include an anticonvulsant and hypoglycemic (to lower blood sugar). The Medication Administration Report (MAR) on Resident #22 for August 2025 listed the use of a long acting insulin, Lantus 32 units, administered one time a day in the morning, and the use of a short acting insulin, Humalog, administered at meals three times a day in amounts based on blood sugar readings. Blood sugars are checked three times a day to correlate with meal service.The MAR for August…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to identify target behaviors for psychotropic medications (medications that affect a person's mental state, emotions, and behavior) for 2 of 5 resident (#28, #50). The facility reported a census of 62. Findings include: 1. 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #28 dated 8/10/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not established because the resident was rarely or never understood. The MDS documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (tissue damage caused by lack of blood flow to the brain), non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, depression, sarcopenia (age-related loss of muscle mass, strength, and function), and quadriplegia. It indicated the resident required setup assistance with eating, maximum assistance with oral and personal hygiene, upper body dressing, and rolling left-to-right in bed, and was dependent with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and other mobility. It further revealed the resident took antianxiety and antidepressant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff interview, guidance from the 2024 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, and facility policy review, the facility failed to fully develop a comprehensive care plan for 3 of 17 residents reviewed (Resident #4, #28, & #50). The faciltiy reported a census of 62 residents. Findings include: 1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #4 dated 6/14/25 recorded the resident experienced mood symptoms of feeling down, depressed, or hopeless; having trouble concentrating on things, and moving or speaking slowly or being fidgety or restless during the previous 2-week look back period. The MDS recorded diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, Anxiety and Depression. The MDS documented the resident received antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications during the prior 7 days of the lookback period. Section V of the MDS, The Care Area Assessment Summary (CAA) documented communication, behavioral symptoms, and pressure ulcer/skin integrity would be included on the resident Care Plan. The MDS question V0200B2 was signed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on electronic health record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to update the Care Plan for 1 of 17 residents reviewed (Resident #9) for the discontinued use of a diuretic. The facility reported a census of 62. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 6/8/25 revealed Resident #9 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Diagnoses on the MDS include Alzheimer's dementia, hypertension, and seizure disorder/epilepsy. The MDS noted the use of an anticonvulsant and no other high-risk drug. The Care Plan, with a target date of 9/14/25, listed the use of diuretic therapy for edema. This was initiated on 9/20/24. The Progress Noted dated 9/19/24 at 9:43 a.m. documented the use of Lasix, a diuretic, for three days due to edema (swelling) and tenderness to Resident #9's lower legs. The medication order history noted an order for Lasix from 9/19/24 to 9/22/24. The Order Summary Report, obtained on 8/28/25, did not list a current order for a diuretic. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure safe and accurate delivery of oxygen therapy for one of three residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #71). The facility reported a census of 62 residents.Findings include:The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #71 had diagnoses of anemia, congestive heart failure, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and obstructive sleep apnea. The MDS documented that the resident had oxygen therapy. The MDS documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 out of 15 for the resident, which is a score for cognitive status skills intact.The Care Plan documented a problem with initiated date 8/19/25 as follows; Resident #71 had altered respiratory status and difficulty breathing requiring oxygen. The Care Plan lacked documentation on oxygen flow rate or delivery method. It also indicated that Resident #71 could use Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA