Estherville Community Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 39.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's individualized interventions were in place to prevent falls for 4 of 4 resident's reviewed (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4). Resident #1 had an alarm to alert staff if she got up so they could assist her. Resident #1 stood up, walked a few steps and fell fracturing her left hip. The resident's alarm did not sound. Resident's #2, #3, and #4 had alarms that failed to sound and alert staff to assist them.The facility reported a census of 36 residents.Findings include:1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #1 demonstrated long- and short-term memory problems and severely impaired skills for daily decision making. The resident required substantial/maximal assist to transfer and partial/moderate assist to ambulate. Resident #1's diagnoses included primary osteoarthrosis of the right knee, age related physical debility, and unspecified fall, subsequent encounter. The resident used a bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent a fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #3). The facility reported a total census of 30 residents. Findings include: Resident #3's clinical record documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder, abnormal weight loss and adult failure to thrive. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of facility provided Incident Report dated 9/5/24 at 5:30 p.m. revealed under incident description staff heard someone yelling help help help. Staff ran to the direction of the screaming. Resident was laying down supine on the floor by the ice machine in the hallway. Resident's head was laying on the floor on the right side of the ice machine. Head towards the north wall with her right leg straight out towards the south of the hall. Resident's left leg was rotated out. Resident was screaming in pain that her left hip hurt so bad. Resident description revealed I slipped. Review of resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, along with facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a call light system within reach for which the call light was caught in the hinge of the side rail and was not able to be triggered when pulled for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #5) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include:Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 for which indicated intact cognitive decisions, was able to be understood and understand others. The MDS addressed the resident as dependent for toileting, hygiene, showers/bathing, lower body dressing, sit to lying, sit to standing and transfers. The MDS included diagnosis of hypertension (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high) anxiety, depression, after-care following replacement of total knee, weakness and need for assistance of personal cares. The Care Plan Focus…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and family interview along with policy/procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that discharge instructions were documented in the residents medical record with the necessary information to the resident/resident representative that is easy to understand in a written form and language for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility identified a census of 38 residents. Findings include:Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognitive decisions, is able to be understood and understand and no behaviors present. The MDS addressed that the resident is independent in the facility with all activities of daily living (dressing, personal hygiene, transfers, ambulation) and a walker is used for mobility. The MDS included diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), hemiplegia (paralysis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records, facility policy and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a safe environment free from financial exploitation of dependent adult abuse for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #32, #41 and #43).The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include:A. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #41 documented diagnoses of cancer, anxiety disorder and depression. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated no cognitive impairment.The Clinical Census report for Resident #41 documented a discharge date of 4/4/25.In an interview on 9/16/25 at 2:08 PM, the son of Resident #'41 reported several months after the resident transferred from the facility, Resident #41's bank notified him of fraudulent charges to a debit card account. The charges started during the time Resident #41 resided at the facility. The fraudulent charges totaled over $13,000. The son reported Resident #41 had a debit card on her person…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to accurately document and submit an accurate resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #7 and #18). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #7's MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, colon cancer, anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atrial fibrillation. The MDS further documented the bed rails used as a physical restraint (any manual method, physical, or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body). Resident #7's Care Plan documented that she could go from lying to sitting on the edge of bed independently. The intervention documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy and staff interview, the facility failed to submit a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with a new mental health diagnosis (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings Include:Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnosis of depression, anxiety, Psychotic Disorder and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Resident #3's Level 1 PASRR dated 6/19/24 lacked a diagnosis of Psychotic disorder and PTSD. Resident #3's clinical record lacked a PASRR after 6/19/24. On 9/17/2025 at 10:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verbalized she submitted PASRR submissions. She reported she did not complete a new one for Resident #3 because the doctor keeps changing her medications around. She was not aware of the PASRR lacked the diagnoses of Psychotic Disorder and PTSD.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide trauma informed care with PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and was not assessed for potential triggers that could cause re-traumatization for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of anxiety, depression, PTSD, and psychotic disorder. Resident #3's behavioral health psych visit notes documented the resident had childhood trauma and history of suicidal attempts in the past. It further documented Resident #3 was grieving the loss of her husband who died a year ago. Resident #3's Care Plan lacked documentation of PTSD, history of suicidal history and loss of her husband. It further lacked potential triggers that could cause the re-traumatization and possible triggers that would cause…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered and received the pneumonia vaccine for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 33 residents.Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #3 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident was not up to date with the pneumonia vaccine, and it was not offered. The Clinical-Immunizations page lacked an entry for a pneumonia vaccine. A Pneumococcal Vaccine Consent dated 6/28/24 documented the resident e-signed that she had been educated on the risks and benefits of the pneumonia vaccine and gave permission for receiving the vaccine. The clinical record lacked documentation the resident received the pneumonia vaccine. According to the MDS assessment dated [DATE] the resident was not up to date with the pneumonia vaccine, and it was not offered. On 9/17/25 at 2:34 PM the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report (July 1 - September 30) review, facility staffing reports review, employee time cards review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate staff reports for the PBJ Staffing Data Report. The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: The PBJ Staffing Data Report with run date 12/4/24 triggered for failing to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours/day - 4 or more days within the quarter with <24 hours/day licensed nursing coverage with specific infraction dates. The report reflected 7 dates with failure to provide 24 hour/day nursing coverage during August and September. Review of the Nurse Schedule for the infraction dates revealed nursing shifts covered by the Director of Nursing (DON), Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff D, LPN, Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN), Staff F, RN, and Staff G, RN for 7/7 dates. Review of time cards for the infraction dates revealed nursing services were provided for 24 hours/day. On 12/11/24 at 2:19…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0636 — pattern
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments within required time frames for 7 of 7 residents (Residents #4, #7, #8, #15, #18, #189, and #190). The facility reported a census of 36. Findings include: On 12/10/24 at 9:31 AM, multiple record reviews revealed seven (7) past-due Comprehensive Assessments (Minimum Data Sets - MDS) and were documented as follows: 1) Resident #4's MDS included an Assessment Reference Date (ARD - last day of observation period) of 11/04/24 with an in-progress status. It indicated 22 days past due. 2) Resident #7's MDS included an ARD of 10/07/24 with an in-progress status. It indicated 50 days past due. 3) Resident #8's MDS included an ARD of 11/05/24 with an in-progress status. It indicated 22 days past due. 4) Resident #15's MDS included an ARD of 10/14/24 with an in-progress status. It indicated 41 days past due. 5) Resident #18's MDS included an ARD of 10/03/24 with an in-progress status. It indicated 54 days past due. 6) Resident #189's MDS included an ARD of 10/29/24 with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to notify the Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of a transfer to a hospital for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #190) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #190's Clinical Census in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed Resident #190 had a hospital unpaid leave from 10/30/24 to 11/6/24. Review of the facility document, Notice of Transfer Form to Long Term Care Ombudsman, for the month of 10/24 revealed there was no notification for the Resident 190's hospitalization beginning on 10/30/24. During an interview on 12/11/24 at 1:42 PM the Administrator acknowledged Resident #190 was neither on the Discharge Report nor the Notice of Transfer to Long Term Care Ombudsman Report. The Administrator stated the resident had been missed on his transfer to the hospital. The Administrator indicated she completed the Ombudsman notifications. On 12/12/24 at 8:00 AM the Administrator stated the expectation was for residents transferred to acute hospitals to be on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $319K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA