Exira Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 37.7 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, clinical record review, facility document review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to supervise a cognitively impaired resident. Staff were unaware Resident #1 left the building on 10/31/24. Staff last saw Resident #1 at approximately 12:45 PM. The door alarm sounded at 1:01 PM, staff responded, took approximately 5 steps outside, did not see anyone, walked back in the facility, disarmed the door alarm and went back to work. At 1:30 PM a different staff member came into the back-parking lot, saw a car backed up against the curb and was blocking the parking lot. Staff realized it was Resident #1 in the driver's seat with the car running and the doors locked. The responding staff member failed to do a thorough check around the facility, failed to notify nursing staff that she did not see anyone, and failed to initiate a head count to ensure all residents were accounted for. The facility reported a census of 38 residents. On 11/7/24 at 4:20 PM the State Survey Agency informed the facility of the staff's failure to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, family interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to respond to resident call lights within 15 minutes for 4 of 4 residents (#1, #2, #5, #6). The facility also assigned an uncertified nursing aide to direct resident care alone, used agency staff to orientate a newly hired Certified Nurse Aide, and failed to respond timely to a request for assistance in a locked memory-care unit. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, and hospice. It indicated she was independent with eating, required setup assistance with oral hygiene, supervision with bed repositioning and personal hygiene, was dependent with lower body dressing and footwear, and required moderate assistance with all other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain dignity for 2 of 3 residents (#6, #7) by leaving a resident's blood-stained sheets on his bed for 4 1/2 hours (#6) and by reaching across the front of a resident's face to pick up a clothing protector off the table (#7). The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia and arthritis. It revealed he required supervision with eating, moderate assistance with oral and personal hygiene, maximal assistance with upper body dressing, and was dependent with all other ADLs and mobility.An undated Care Plan indicated the resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to dementia and was at risk for infection related to a suprapubic catheter (urinary catheter surgically…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide baths for 2 of 3 residents (#1, #3) who required bathing assistance. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, and hospice. It indicated she required supervision with eating and bed repositioning, required moderate assistance with oral hygiene, lying-to-sitting, and sitting-to-lying, required maximal assistance with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and forms of mobility.An undated Care Plan indicated the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia and directed staff to provide sponge bath when a full bath or shower cannot be tolerated.A hospice document titled Aide Visit Note dated 3/01/26 - 4/29/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to appropriately complete assessments for 3 of 3 residents (#1, #6, #7) who fell at the facility. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, and hospice. It indicated she was independent with eating, required setup assistance with oral hygiene, supervision with bed repositioning and personal hygiene, was dependent with lower body dressing and footwear, and required moderate assistance with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and forms of mobility.An undated Care Plan indicated the resident had impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to dementia and directed staff to monitor/document/report PRN any changes in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to use a gait belt while transferring a resident who required assistance with mobility for 2 of 3 residents (#3, #4) and failed to lock a wheelchair while transferring a resident without a gait belt for 1 of 3 residents (#4). The facility reported a census of 35 residents.Findings include:1. Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and non-Alzheimer's dementia. It revealed she required moderate assistance with eating and was dependent with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and all forms of mobility.The Care Plan dated 10/15/25 indicated the resident was a fall risk related to chronic confusion and directed staff to use 2-person assistance or a mechanical standing lift for transfers as needed to promote safety.2. Resident #4's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinic record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain competent staff by allowing a Training Nurse Aide (TNA - uncertified nurse aide) to incorrectly transfer two (2) residents (#3, #4), incorrectly apply a leg immobilizer on a resident with a broken leg (#2), and assign a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) without evidence of dementia training to provide care for dementia residents. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE] identified a BIMS score of 14 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of cancer, heart failure, and a left leg fracture. It indicated she was independent with eating and oral hygiene, required setup assistance with upper body dressing and personal hygiene, required maximal assistance with all other ADLs and was dependent with all forms of mobility.An undated Care Plan indicated the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene while assisting with meals for 2 of 3 residents (#3, #6) who were dependent with eating. The facility reported a census of 35 residents.Findings include:1. Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and non-Alzheimer's dementia. It revealed she required moderate assistance with eating and was dependent with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and all forms of mobility.An undated Care Plan indicated the resident had a self-care deficit related to Alzheimer's disease and directed staff to attempt to participate and provide assistance with eating.2. Resident #6's MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified a BIMS score of 00 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility failed to adequately supervise residents in the locked Chronic Confusion or Dementing Illness (CCDI) unit for 1 of 6 residents. The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #30 was severely cognitively impaired and had delusions. She used a walker and required supervision for transfers and toileting. Her diagnoses included: cerebrovascular accident (CVA), dementia and asthma. The Care Plan for Resident #30, updated on 6/18/25, showed that she had self-care deficits, secondary to chronic confusion and dementia. The resident was an elopement risk, disoriented to place and wandered aimlessly. Staff were to distract the resident from wandering and offer diversions. Resident #30 had communication problems, was rarely understood, and was at risk for falls related to altered mobility and unsteady gait. She had poor safety awareness. Staff were directed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility failed to provide adequate urinary catheter care for 2 of 2 residents reviewed. Resident #1 had chronic urinary tract infections and staff failed to monitor his output as ordered. Resident #28 had an order to not insert more than 10 milliliters (ml) of fluid in the catheter balloon. Staff failed to transcribe the specific order and administered fluid according to the catheter package. The facility reported a census of 44 residents.Findings include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #28 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 (moderate cognitive deficit). He required partial assistance with toileting, transfers, and dressing. The resident had an indwelling catheter and diagnoses that included: coronary artery disease, dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), retention of urine and edema. The Care Plan, updated on 6/5/25, showed that Resident #28 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, document review, resident interview, and staff interviews the facility failed to consistently monitor meal intakes for residents for sufficient nutrition to maintain proper weight for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include:Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further revealed diagnoses of stroke, hyponatremia (low sodium levels in the blood), non-Alzheimer's dementia, and hemiplegia (paralysis or severe weakness on one side of the body).Interview 8/04/25 at 11:23 AM with Resident #6 revealed that she has lost some weight, and that she is on a mechanical soft diet. Resident #6 further revealed that she is on a supplement as well. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident #6 revealed on 1/12/25 Resident #6 weighed 147 pounds. On 7/27/25 Resident #6 weighed 133 pounds which is a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$22,880 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $22,880 — penalty dated 2024-10-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA