Maple Crest Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 37.1 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, and resident and staff interview the facility failed to complete pre and post dialysis assessments for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis services (Resident #24). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #24 dated 4/9/25 documented the Resident's diagnoses included hypertension, renal insufficiency, and diabetes mellitus. The MDS documented the Resident received dialysis while a resident at the facility. The Care Plan for Resident #24 included a focus area of care of a resident on dialysis services. The interventions included dialysis 3 times a week. It also included to document and monitoring of complications, pre and post dialysis weights and access site. The Care Plan directed nurses to complete pre and post dialysis assessment twice a day on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays before and after her dialysis treatments. During an interview on 5/20/25 at 9:34 AM, Resident #24 explained she went to dialysis 3 times a week, on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. She further explained she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to utilize enhanced barrier precaution for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #39). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #39 dated 4/24/25, listed diagnoses of hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD), and depression. The MDS included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 (severe cognitive impairments). The MDS identified an indwelling urinary catheter for Resident #39. The Care Plan for Resident #39 dated 5/1/2025, revealed the diagnosis for the indwelling catheter as hydronephrosis with ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction occurs when a blockage at the point where the kidney connects to the ureter (the tube that carries urine to the bladder) causes urine to back up and swell the kidney. The Care Plan failed to direct the use of enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). The Treatment Administration Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, Novolog highlights of prescribing information (manufacturer's directions for use) review, and staff interview, the facility failed to prime an insulin pen with 2 units of insulin prior to the administration of the physician ordered dose of insulin for 1 of 1 residents observed for insulin administration (Resident #4). The facility identified a census of 37 residents. Findings include: Resident #4 Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive loss. The MDS listed a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and documented Resident #4 received insulin injections 7 days per week. The Care Plan dated 9/18/23 noted a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and directed the staff to administer medications as ordered by the doctor. The December 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) detailed the following physician orders: a. Blood sugar check four times a day before meals and hour of sleep for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based record review, document review, staff interviews, and the facilities Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan the facility failed to implement a successful QAPI program for 1 of 1 repeated citations. The facility reported a census of 37 residents. Findings include: A Summary Statement of Deficiencies and plan of corrections dated 2/25/21 and 6/23/22 documented citation F582 Beneficiary Notices cited from the two prior recertification surveys. The facility submitted plans of correction which included ongoing monitoring of the process to ensure compliance. On 12/19/23 at 9:00 AM Staff C, Registered Nurse reported the facility has 2 -4 skilled residents receiving Medicare Services at any given time. The Summary Statement of Deficiencies dated 12/21/23 included the following repeat deficiency of F582. On 12/21/23 at 10:04 AM the Administrator acknowledged the facility had addressed their beneficiary notices through the QAPI program from the prior annual survey and had not fully fixed the process. She reported going forward they will be putting processes in place…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · B2023-12-21 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, document review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a Medicare Notice of Non-Coverage (NOMNC) notification to the resident or their legal representative two days prior to the ending of services and failed to provide the Skilled Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) notice for 2 of 3 residents sampled (Resident #4 and #21). The facility identified a census of 37 residents. Findings include: 1. A Point Click Care (PCC) Electronic Census record showed Resident #4 admitted to Medicare Part A skilled services on 10/20/23 and discharged off of Medicare services on 10/26/23. A SNF ABN detailed Resident #4 would incur out of pocket expenses as of 10/28/23 due to no longer requiring care by a licensed therapist and no longer requiring skilled level of nursing care at $410 per day. The Resident Representative indicated the Resident did not want the care listed. The Resident representative signed the notice on 10/31/23. A NOMNC form detailed Medicare services would end on 10/27/23 explaining the Resident's appeal rights…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · B2023-12-21 · tag F0625 — pattern
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #10 and #21). The facility reported a census of 37 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool dated 11/22/23 for Resident #10 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating cognitively intact. Review of the Clinical Census revealed Resident #10 transferred to the hospital on 1/07/23, 1/17/23, and 4/8/23. The clinical records for Resident #10 lacked documentation of any explanation of the bed hold notification to the resident or the resident's representative when the resident discharged to the hospital on 1/07/23, 1/17/23, and 4/8/23. On 12/20/23 at 8:43 AM, the Administrator reported she did not have a bed hold for the January and April transfers to the hospital. She reported the nurses do the bed holds when a resident transfers either with the resident or calls the family and gets a verbal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · B2023-12-21 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to electronically transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) system timely for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #6, #15 and #28). The facility reported a census of 37 residents. Findings include: The review of Resident #6, Resident #15, and Resident #28 MDS assessments dated 10/17/23 documented a transmission date of 12/15/23. On 12/19/23 at 2:20 PM, the DON reported she expected any MDS to be transmitted in the timely manner. During an interview on 12/19/23 at 3:49 PM, the MDS coordinator reported MDS assessments should be transmitted in a timely manner. She reported within 24-hours of submission she gets a report if they are accepted or not. She verbalized she was aware of the late transmissions on the 3 residents. She verbalized she goes by the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) for reference for submission times. The CMS Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's manual revised on October 2023 instructs MDS assessments must be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · B2023-12-21 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, document review, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment to accurately reflect the status and care needs of the resident for 2 of 12 residents reviewed (Resident #9 & Resident #2). The facility identified a census of 37 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #9's MDS dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The Resident required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility and extensive assistance of one staff for transfers. The MDS listed a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease and indicated Resident #9 utilized bed rails on a daily basis as a physical restraint. The Care Plan with revised intervention date 2/20/22 detailed Resident #9 utilized two half bed rails up to assist with bed mobility/repositioning. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA