Greenfield Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 42.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 3Number of residents cited: 1Based on clinical record review, family interview, staff interviews, hospital record review and policy review, the facility failed to properly supervise a resident and failed to implement interventions to prevent a fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. Resident #49 sustained a femur fracture after she fell from the commode. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Resident #49 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). She was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and totally dependent on staff for hygiene, dressing, and transfers. Resident #49 had impairment on both sides of her lower extremities, was frequently incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. Her diagnoses included: Multiple Sclerosis (MS), malnutrition, anxiety disorder, depression and muscle spasm. The Care Plan dated 3/20/25, showed that Resident #49 was admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and family interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to obtain all of 1 of 3 resident's (Resident #1) medications once they were admitted to the facility. The facility reported a census of 42 residents.Findings include:According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 10/31/2025, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which suggested no cognitive impairment. The MDS listed the following diagnoses for Resident #1: hypertension, hip fracture, stroke, depression, cognitive communication deficit and atrial fibrillation.Record review of the scripts sent to the facility's pharmacy revealed the following order: doxazosin mesylate (treat high blood pressure) 2 milligram (mg). Give 0.5 tablet by mouth two times a day (BID). The order was electronically signed on 10/29/2025 at 10:54 AM. Review of Resident #1's October 2025 Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to provided incontinent cares on the overnight shift for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.Findings include:According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 12/11/2025, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which suggested no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she exhibited no rejection of care during the review period and had impairments to her bilateral upper and lower extremities. Resident #3 required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene and personal hygiene. Resident #3 was frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. The following diagnoses were listed for Resident #3: ulcerative colitis, paraplegia, anxiety, and depression.A Care Plan Focus Area with a revision date of 8/13/2024 documented Resident #3 had bladder incontinence. The Care Plan intervention revised 11/5/2024 encouraged staff to change…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-17 · tag F0636 — pattern
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: 11Number of residents cited: 8Based on clinical record review, staff interview and guidance from the 2024 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to complete and transmit Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments within federal guidelines for 6 of 11 residents (#1, #2, #4, #6, #8, #18) reviewed for MDS Assessments. The facility reported a census of 43 residents.Findings include:1. The admission (Comprehensive) Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #1 documented an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/18/25. The MDS recorded the resident had an admission date to the facility of 3/12/25. Page 58 of the MDS recorded a completion date of 4/2/25, day 22 of the resident's stay.2. The admission (Comprehensive) MDS of Resident #2 documented an ARD date of 1/15/25. The MDS recorded the resident had an admission date to the facility of 1/3/25. Page 58 of the MDS recorded a completion date of 1/28/25, day 26 of the resident's stay.3. The admission (Comprehensive) MDS of Resident #4 documented an ARD date of 8/2/24. The MDS recorded the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 3Number of residents cited: 1Based on staff interviews, Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, policy review and document review, the facility failed to provide the estimated cost of service with the end of a Medicare part A stay or when all of part B therapies were ending to 1 of 3 resident representatives (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 43 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #6's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) documented Resident #6 was rarely / never understood. Review of the document dated 5/28/25 titled, Declaration Relating to Life-sustaining Procedures (Living Will) and Durable Power of Attorney For Health Care Decisions (Medical Power of Attorney) documented Resident #6's daughter as power of attorney for health care decisions. Review of Resident #6's EHR titled, Profile documented Resident #6's daughter as the responsible party.Review of document titled, Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 3Number of residents cited: 1Based on clinical record review, staff interview and guidance from the 2024 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to complete Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments within federal guidelines for 1 of 3 (Resident #39) residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: The MDS portion of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of Resident #39 recorded the resident's admission MDS was dated 11/28/24 with a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. The Resident then had a discharge MDS dated [DATE] with a re-entry dated 5/14/25. Per the MDS tracker built into the software, the next quarterly MDS was due 5/23/25. Upon review on 7/15/25 at 11:45 am, no further Quarterly assessments had been scheduled or completed. A Medicare - 5 day MDS dated [DATE] was the last MDS scheduled or completed. Page 2-35 of the 2024 RAI Manual documented a Quarterly Assessment must be within 92 days of the Previous OBRA assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: 13Number of residents cited: 2Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, information from a drug manufacturer and guidance from the 2024 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to accurately reflect the status of 2 of 13 residents in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments (Resident #2, Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: 1. The MDS of Resident #2 dated 4/10/25 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 14 which indicated cognition intact. The MDS coded the resident had a start date for Speech therapy as 3/18/25. The MDS recorded the resident had zero minutes of speech therapy during the seven day lookback period of April 4/4/25 - 4/10/25. The MDS coded the resident had a start date for Occupational Therapy of 3/18/25 and also recorded zero minutes of Occupational Therapy during the same seven day lookback period. The MDS coded the resident had a start date for Physical Therapy of 3/19/25, also with zero minutes of therapy recorded. On 7/14/25 at 3:02 pm, Resident #2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: 13Number of residents cited: 1Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement a Baseline Care Plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 13 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: The Census Line portion of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) of Resident #2 recorded the resident had moved from the facility's Assisted Living into the Long Term Care portion of the facility on 1/3/25. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment of Resident #2, dated 1/3/25, additionally recorded an admission date of 1/3/25. The Care Plan Section of Resident #2 EHR identified her most recent Care Plan had been initiated on 1/15/25. The prior Care Plan had an initiation date of 11/22/2022. When reviewed on 7/15/25, the Care Plan reflected initiation dates that varied by focus area. The earliest initiation date was documented as 1/20/25, which was five days after the Care Plan was noted as initiated and 17 days after the resident was admitted to the Long Term Care portion of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 3Number of residents cited: 3Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent indwelling catheters from potential contamination by securing the urine drainage bag on a resident's trash can and allowing a drainage bag on rest on the floor for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (#3, #22). Staff also failed to don Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) or perform proper hand hygiene during indwelling catheter care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (#29). The facility reported a census of 43. 1. On 7/14/2025 at 12:24 PM, Resident #22 was observed seated at a dining room table with an indwelling urinary catheter. At 2:21 PM, Resident #22’s urinary bag was observed hanging on the side of the trashcan to the right of his recliner. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of chronic kidney…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to establish comprehensive, resident specific care plans for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #9, #13, #4 and #26). The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #9 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). The resident was independent with eating, dressing, transfers and toileting. Her diagnosis included heart failure, renal insufficiency, diabetes and depression. The resident was taking an anticoagulant, insulin, opioid, antidepressant and a diuretic medication. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Care Plan dated 8/12/24, showed that Resident #9 had the potential for nutritional problems related to diagnosis of congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, depression, obesity and chronic kidney disease. She had weight fluctuations related to edema/diuresis. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure that opened food items were dated. They failed to mitigate possible food contamination by using proper hand hygiene and hair net use. The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Findings include: On 8/26/24 at 10:25 AM, in an initial tour of the kitchen, Staff E, [NAME] was found at the sink in the kitchen. He had a full beard and mustache that was not covered. A survey of the refrigerator revealed a tray of drinks uncovered, and a large open bag of shredded lettuce undated. The dry storage area contained a large open bag of cheerios undated. On 8/27/24 at 11:55 AM, in an observation of the lunch service, Staff F, Dietary Aide, prepared a grilled cheese sandwich. She put a glove on her left hand, then opened a container of butter, opened the bread bag and reached into the bag and got bread, all with the same gloved hand. She then opened a container with cheese slices and took out a slice of cheese with same gloved hand. On 8/27/24 at 7:55 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) said she understood that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$4,516 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $4,516 — penalty dated 2024-01-30
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-13 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $131K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA