Scenic Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 77 beds and averages 64.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff, and provider interviews, the facility failed to properly obtain a physician order for a resident admitted to the facility on Coumadin/warfarin (an anticoagulant or blood thinner medication) after discharge from the hospital (Resident #3). Resident #3 admitted to the facility from the hospital following an admission related to acute strokes and atrial fibrillation (AF - rapid heart rate caused by poor blood flow). Resident #3 required the use of Coumadin to help prevent blood clots to prevent future strokes. When he admitted to the facility, the facility failed to ensure he had an order on admission to monitor the therapeutic levels of Coumadin. Resident #3 didn't have the thickness of his blood (INR) checked until 3 weeks after his admission to the facility, when he admitted to the hospital for pneumonia. When the hospital checked his INR, the result reflected a level of 8.85 (therapeutic is 2-3), reflecting an INR level 3-4 times higher than therapeutic. The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, family interview, staff interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to notify a resident representative of a change in condition for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #50). Resident #50 was found to have a large raised area on her lower back on 2/2/24. The facility did not notify Resident #50's resident representative of the area until after the primary care provider (PCP) had seen the area on 2/7/24. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set for Resident #50 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 9 indicating moderately impaired cognition. The Clinical Resident Profile for Resident #50 listed her son as the emergency contact #1. A Timeline for Resident #50 provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) during the survey 5/13/24 to 5/14/24, documented the following: 1/17/24- skin review- no new areas of concern noted by nurse 1/24/24- skin review- no new areas of concern noted by nurse 1/31/24- skin review- no new areas of concern noted by nurse 2/2/24- the PCP notified of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, staff interviews and manufacturer's insert, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards regarding medication administration for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #30 twice) observed who did not have their insulin flex pen primed prior to administering insulin (to ensure the proper amount of insulin administered). The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 5/15/24 at 8:28 AM, Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) administered Novolog 5 units to Resident #22. Staff A gave the shot in the upper right arm. She did not prime the insulin pen prior to administration. During an observation on 5/15/24 at 8:54 AM, Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered Novolog 9 units and Tresiba 54 units to Resident #30. Staff B gave both shots in the upper left arm. She did not prime either insulin pens prior to administration. Review of the facility's Insulin Administration policy, revised September 2014, did not have information specific to insulin pen administration. The policy stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interview, and manufacturer's package insert review, the facility failed to keep their medication error rate less than 5 percent. An observation of 39 medications being passed was completed with 3 medication errors noted giving the facility a 7.69% medication error rate. Resident #30 had 2 observations of insulin administration via FlexPen and both observations revealed no priming of the FlexPen. There was no way of knowing if the resident received the appropriate scheduled dose. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Finding Include: 1. During an observation on 5/15/24 at 8:28 AM, Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) administered Novolog 5 units to Resident #22. Staff A gave the shot in the upper right arm. She did not prime the insulin pen prior to administration. Review of current physician orders on the May 2024 Medication Administration Record/Treatment Administration Record (MAR/TAR) for Resident #22 revealed the resident to receive the following: a. Novolog Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Aspart) Inject 5 unit subcutaneous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication cart was locked on 2 separate occasions when Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), responsible for the cart, was not in direct sight of the cart. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 5/13/24 at 12:29 PM revealed a medication cart unlocked and unoccupied on the west hall. Two residents observed self propelling passed the unlocked medication cart. At 12:34 PM (5 minutes later) Staff C, LPN returned to the cart and continued with the medication pass. During an interview on 5/13/24 at 3:48 PM, the facility Administrator revealed it is expected the nurses lock medication carts and computers when stepping away from the cart. 2. On 5/13/24 at 11:33 AM, a medication cart observed unlocked and unattended in the hallway by the main dining room, the court yard dining room. Several residents observed to walk by the medication cart and several residents were seated near the medication cart. The staff member responsible for the cart was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices during urinary catheter care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #46) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: The Care Plan for Resident #46, with a revision date of 1/5/24, documented under the focus area the resident has an indwelling catheter and instructed under the intervention and task section to maintain enhanced barrier precautions and to observe and document intake and output. During an observation on 5/14/24 at 4:08 PM, Staff D, CNA, prepared to complete the task of emptying the catheter bag for Resident #46, with the Director of Nursing (DON) present. Staff D her washed hands, donned a gown and donned gloves. Staff D used a gait belt, transferred the resident to his bathroom, and placed the resident on the toilet. Staff D lowered the resident's pants to have access to the leg catheter bag. Staff D placed a plastic container to capture the output inside another larger plastic container as a barrier, with a plastic liner…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had prescription medication readily available following discharge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had an admission date of 1/8/24 and a planned discharge date of 2/3/24. The Care Plan initiated 1/8/24 revealed Resident #3 planned to return to the community with a goal to successfully return to the community after meeting all goals at the facility and a safe return to the community. Review of undated facility form titled, Discharge Summary/Post Discharge Plan Of Care, reflected the facility arranged pharmacy services for Resident #3 at a pharmacy in [NAME]. Review of an electronic mail (email) correspondence dated 2/5/24 at 8:37 AM to Staff A, admission Coordinator, revealed a family member of Resident #3 inquired about the resident's prescription medication as the discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA