Pleasantview Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 59.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.05 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.44 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · F2026-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to discard expired food and beverage items, maintain sanitary work stations, and ensure staff complete hand hygiene during meal preparation during 3 of 3 kitchen observations. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include:1. During the initial observation on 03/30/2026 from 10:12 AM through 10:52 AM the following items were noted to be expired:a. A box of black tea with a use by date of 11/13/2025 was located on a top shelf in view of the food preparation areab. Four boxes of shredded wheat cereal with use by dates of 01/17/2026 were located on the top shelf in the dry storage roomc. Six bottles of almond milk with use by dates of 01/04/2026 were located on a top shelf in view of the food preparation aread. A powdered cherry thirst quencher with a use by date of 03/06/2026 was located near the almond milk; and a powdered orange thirst quencher with a use by date of 03/14/2026 was located next to the cherry drinkOn 03/30/2026 at 10:55 AM Staff R, Dining Services Coordinator stated she audited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to assist a resident to use the bathroom in a timely manner causing them to have been incontinent for 3 of 4 resident (Resident #6, Resident #21and Resident #64) reviewed for dignity. The facility reported a census of 58 residents.Findings included:1. Review of Resident #21 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/17/26, revealed the resident had intact cognition based on a a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. The MDS indicated Resident #20 required substantial assistance with toileting and dependent for transfers. The MDS assessed Resident #21 frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. On 3/30/26 at 11:51 AM, during an interview, Resident #21 reported staff used a non-powered mechanical standing lift (a lift known as a Sara Steady) to transfer from her wheelchair to the toilet. The resident reported having to wait 30 minutes to get into the bathroom on a daily basis due to staff waiting on the Sara Steady to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff administered medications without a significant medication error for 1of 10 residents (Resident #47) reviewed for medication administration. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings included:Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/20/26, revealed that Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The list of diagnoses included major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorder. The MDS indicated that Resident #47 received antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications. Review of the Care Plan, initiated 8/11/25, directed staff to administer psychotropic medications as ordered by physician, document and report as needed to the physician, and observe for any side effects. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed a Health Status Note, dated 3/29/26 at 11:06 PM, entered by Staff S, Registered Nurse (RN): Nurse administered medications to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene with a change in gloves after completing catheter care for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #10.) The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings included: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10, dated 3/10/26, revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and required partial to moderate assistance with toileting and personal hygiene, set up assistance with oral hygiene, substantial assistance with lower body dressing, and partial to moderate assistance for upper body dressing. On 4/1/26 at 7:21 AM, Staff D, Certified Nurses Aide (CNA), performed hand hygiene, put on a gown and gloves prior to entering Resident #10's room. Resident #10 was lying in bed. Staff D unhooked the urinary catheter bag from the side of the bed and hooked it to the resident's walker. Staff D helped the resident to sit up in bed, and then applied a gait belt around the resident's waist. Staff D cleaned off the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer oral medications following standard infection control practices for 2 of 6 residents observed for medication administration (Resident #6 and Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated intact cognition. Review of the March 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Resident #9 scheduled the following medication in the morning: a. Omeprazole 40 mg (milligram) 1 cap (capsule) PO (by mouth) early every morning. b. Cetirizine 10 mg 1 tab (tablet) PO early every morning. c. Tamsulosin 0.4 mg 1 cap PO early every morning. d. Vitamin B-12 500 mcg (microgram) 1 tab PO every morning. e. Vitamin C 500 mg 1 cap every morning. f. Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tabs PO TID (three times a day). During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure resident safety and to mitigate risk for elopement for 1 of 2 residents reviewed. (Resident #2) The facility reported census was 49. Findings include: According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 12/26/23, Resident #2 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 indicating a severely impaired cognitive status. Resident #2 required limited assistance with transfers, mobility and extensive assistance with dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #2's diagnosis included Alzheimer's and an aortic aneurysm. According to Resident #2's plan of care dated 1/3/23, Resident #2 is an elopement risk related to wandering behavior with interventions which included monitoring location frequently across all shifts, document wandering behavior if observed, the use of a wander guard, and staff to ensure it is in place and functioning properly each shift and to replace it as needed. In an interview on 2/20/24 at 10:04 a.m. Staff B,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 35 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA