Southeast Iowa Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show <0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 49.1 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.94 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.60 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-07-01 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, hospital record review, facility investigative file review, employee file review staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to prepare and serve the recommended therapeutic meal in a form designed to safely meet the resident's needs and according to physician orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). This resulted in Resident #1 choking on a peanut butter and jelly uncrustable, she became unconscious, CPR was initiated, the resident gained consciousness and was sent to the hospital. She was found to have a pneumothorax. Resident #1 was given an improper textured diet when she asked for a snack; she was ordered to receive a puree diet. The facility reported a census of 50 residents. On June 26, 2026 at 10:32 AM the State Agency informed the facility the staff's failure to properly prepare and serve the therapeutic meal per orders creating an Immediate Jeopardy situation which began on June 26, 2026. The facility removed the immediacy on June, 26, 2026 at 2:57 PM when the facility staff implanted the following Corrective…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, list of residents with personal accounts maintained by the facility, facility policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide quarterly personal account statements to 1 of 1 residents sampled (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1, dated 12/18/25, revealed an admission date of 12/30/24. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 indicated Resident #1 had a moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview on 1/5/26 at 10:25 AM, Resident #1 reported the facility assisted her in managing her money. Resident #1 reported she had not received a quarterly statement, and she had not requested a statement. Review of the list of residents with personal accounts maintained by the facility revealed a total of 46 (including Resident #1) resident personal accounts managed by the facility. During an interview on 01/07/2026 at 2:50 PM, the Administrative Assistant reported she was responsible for maintaining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure accurate information reflected current resident status for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #4) reviewed for quarterly assessments. The facility report a census of 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 10/16/25, under Section O. Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs; Subcategory: Respiratory Treatments, documented in F1. that Resident #3 required an invasive mechanical ventilator while a resident at the facility. Review of the assessment under Section N. Medications; Subcategory: Insulin, documented that Resident #3 received insulin injection on 1 of the 7 days during the look back period. Review of the Care Plan, revised on 10/21/25, lacked indication that Resident #3 utilized an invasive mechanical ventilator or administration of insulin injections. Review of Active Orders, dated 1/07/25, revealed that Resident #3 had the following orders: a. Trulicity (dulaglutide) (once-weekly injection prescribed with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and the manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to use the manufacturer approved needle to inject the insulin for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for insulin administration (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #15 with intact cognition based on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. The MDS list of diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, and indicated Resident #15 received insulin injections 7 out of 7 days. Review of the Physician Orders revealed an order for Admelog U-100 Insulin (Lispro) solution- give 6 units subcutaneous with meals. During an observation 1/7/26 at 11:07 AM, Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) prepared Resident #15 lunch insulin. Staff D wiped off the Admelog insulin pen hub with an alcohol pad and then inserted an insulin syringe and withdrew 6 units of insulin from the pen. Staff D stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide assistance with nail care for 1 of 2 residents sampled (Resident #42). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include:Review of Resident #42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/13/25, revealed an admission date of 9/18/2020. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15 indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. The list of diagnoses included schizophrenia (a mental health disorder causing a causing a disconnect with reality), diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The MDS indicated Resident #42 utilized a wheelchair and walker for mobility, and required partial to moderate staff assistance for showering and set up assistance for eating and oral hygiene. Review of Resident #42's Care Plan, dated 11/19/25, revealed a Problem area to address I am independent with ADL's (activities of daily living) assist me as needed. During an observation on 01/05/26 at 10:50 AM, Resident #42 sat in a wheelchair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide intervention to relieve symptoms of constipation for residents with 3 days or longer without a bowel movement for 2 of 2 residents sampled (Resident #13 and #47). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings include:1.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #13, dated 12/2/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS indicated continent of bowel and bladder. During an interview on 1/5/26 at 11:36 AM, Resident #13 reported concerns of constipation. Resident #13 reported going three or more days without a bowel movement and without nursing giving her any medication to help. She reported requesting medication to help, but did not receive any. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed a list of diagnoses which included, in part gastro-esophageal reflux disease, functional dyspepsia (chronic indigestion characterized by bloating, feeling full quickly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene completed as part of infection control techniques during wound care for 1 of 1 (Resident #47) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 50.Findings include:Review of Resident #47 Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed had a severe cognitive impairment, incontinent of bowel and bladder, dependent for all activities of daily living and at risk for pressure ulcers.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed the following Physician Orders:a. Apply Calmoseptine to coccyx wound daily, dated 1/6/26.b. Cleanse wound right thorax mid-back, apply Calcium Alginate to wound bed, apply skin prep to surrounding skin and cover with Mepilex once a day, dated 12/26/25.During an observation on 1/7/26 at 3:12 PM, Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) performed hand hygiene (used an alcohol-based hand rub), donned personal protective equipment and entered Resident #47's room to perform wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$25,495 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $25,495 — penalty dated 2026-07-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in IA