Rose Haven Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 47.5 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, State Climatologist Report, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent hazards during a temporary modification of a safety intervention. The Maintenance Supervisor turned off the alarm to the southeast outside door to allow workers access to resident areas for repairs and failed to notify nursing staff for 2 1/2 hours. A confused, independently mobile resident exited the door in his wheelchair and was found outside in 36-degree weather at the time of his exit from the building with wind gusts of 24 mph causing a Wind Chill of 27 degrees and no coat to protect him. Estimated time outside of the building was 10-15 minutes. The failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to the health and safety of the resident. The facility reported a census of 44 residents. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of October 30, 2023 on November 2, 2023 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, facility policy review, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to implement transmission based precaution procedures, monitor, and test residents with symptoms or exposure to COVID-19 virus for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that criteria was followed to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission when Resident #2 tested positive for COVID-19 on 2/19/26 at the hospital, then returned to the facility on 2/25/26 (7 days), the facility did not provide additional precautions for Resident #2 who continued to have respiratory symptoms. The facility further failed to prevent transmission of COVID-19 when 2 direct care staff reported symptoms while working of fever, body aches, cough, decreased smell/taste, and tested positive for COVID-19 at the facility on 2/24/26, both staff continued to provide direct cares and work 12 hour shifts on 3 of 3 hallways. The facility additionally…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to determine that it was clinically appropriate and safe for a resident to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for the self-administration of medications(Resident #13). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings included: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 9/30/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #13 which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD), a disease which caused symptoms such as shortness of breath), heart failure, and diabetes. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The 2022 facility policy Self-Administration of Medications stated residents had the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team determined that it was clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. The December 2025 Medication Administration Record(MAR) listed a 7/21/25 order for Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution(a medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse(Resident #35). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings:The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 9/2/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #35 which included unspecified intellectual disabilities, hearing loss, and coronary artery disease. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 6 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The facility Abuse Policy, dated 7/1/25, stated all residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect. The policy stated assault of a dependent adult was the commission of any act which was generally intended to cause pain or injury or which was generally intended to result in physical contact considered by a reasonable person to be insulting or offensive or any act intended to place another in fear of immediate physical contact which would be painful, injurious, insulting, or offensive, coupled with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to carry out a gradual dose reduction(GDR) or ensure the provider documented why the reduction would be clinically contraindicated for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for psychotropic medications(Resident #35). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings included:The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 9/2/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #35 which included unspecified intellectual disabilities, hearing loss, and coronary artery disease. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 6 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The December 2025 Medication Administration Record(MAR) listed the following:A 3/27/25 order for Trazodone(an antidepressant) 100 milligrams(mg) daily.A 3/28/25 order for Duloxetine(an antidepressant) 120 mg daily. As of 12/8/25, the facility lacked documentation of an attempted GDR for the above medications or provider documentation as to why the reduction would be clinically contraindicated.On 12/11/25, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse(Resident #35). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings:The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 9/2/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #35 which included unspecified intellectual disabilities, hearing loss, and coronary artery disease. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 6 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The facility Abuse Policy, dated 7/1/25, stated the facility would report all allegations of abuse to the State Agency within 2 hours.Care Plan entries, dated 4/4/25, stated the resident had impaired cognitive function, intellectual disability, and hearing loss impeding communications. The entries directed staff to orient the resident as needed, keep his routine consistent, and engage him in simple structured activities that avoided overly demanding tasks. An Unwitnessed Fall report, dated 10/28/25 at 1:46 p.m., stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to separate an alleged perpetrator of abuse from residents for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse(Resident #35). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings:The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 9/2/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #35 which included unspecified intellectual disabilities, hearing loss, and coronary artery disease. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 6 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The facility Abuse Policy, dated 7/1/25, stated the facility would separate the employee accused of abuse from all residents.Care Plan entries, dated 4/4/25, stated the resident had impaired cognitive function, intellectual disability, and hearing loss impeding communications. The entries directed staff to orient the resident as needed, keep his routine consistent, and engage him in simple structured activities that avoided overly demanding tasks. An Unwitnessed Fall report, dated 10/28/25 at 1:46 p.m., stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to administer insulin in a timely manner with respect to the obtainment of the resident's blood sugar(BS) for 1 of 2 residents(Resident #2) reviewed for insulin(an injectable medication used to lower blood sugars). The facility reported a census of 45 residents.Findings included:The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 11/2/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #2 which included diabetes(a disease which causes irregularities in blood sugars), arthritis, and anxiety, and listed his Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident's Blood Sugar Summary included the following blood sugar readings:11/23/25 5:20 a.m. 110 mg/dl(milligrams(mg)/deciliter(dl) and 8:11 a.m. 110 mg/dl11/24/25 5:25 a.m. 150 mg/dl and 9:18 a.m. 150 mg/dl11/25/25 5:30 a.m. 225 mg/dl and 6:50 a.m. 225 mg/dl11/26/25 6:23 a.m. 222 mg/dl and 8:58 a.m. 222 mg/dl11/29/25 5:37 a.m. 188 mg/dl and 8:28 a.m. 188 mg/dl11/30/25 5:19 a.m. 253 mg/dl and 826 a.m. 253 mg/dlThe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to assess and intervene in a timely manner after a resident complained of signs and symptoms of an infection for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for a change in condition(Resident #26). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings included:The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 9/23/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #26 which included diabetes(a disease which caused irregularities in blood sugars), non-Alzheimer's dementia, and depression. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 12/8/25 at 1:42 p.m., Resident #26 stated it took the facility a week before they obtained medication for her yeast infection. She stated she had burning and itching and it was very, very uncomfortable.A 11/25/25 5:11 AM Nurses Note documented that the facility sent a fax to the resident's provider related to a possible yeast infection. The resident's vaginal area was red and she had discomfort when using the bathroom and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to treat one out of four residents reviewed in a dignified manor (Resident#5). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Finding include: The Significant Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #5 dated 2/18/25, included diagnoses of neurogenic bladder, pressure ulcer, diabetes mellitus (DM), anxiety, and depression. The MDS reflected Resident#5's Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 (intact cognition). The MDS listed Resident#5 dependent on staff for toilet transfers and toilet hygiene. The Care Plan for Resident#5 dated 2/18/25, directed Staff to assist her with toileting upon her request, Resident#5 often preferred to utilize the commode. Staff assist with peri cares (procedure to clean and maintain the genital and anal areas) every AM, PM and as needed with incontinence episodes. On 3/6/35 at 8:30 AM, Resident#5 sat in her room in her wheelchair and she confirmed Staff B, Certified Nurses Aid (CNA) told her to go to the bathroom in her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, resident interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in a timely manner for 1 out of 4 residents reviewed for abuse ( Resident#2). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident#2 dated 1/24/25, listed diagnoses of respiratory failure, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. The BIMS reflected a score of 12 (moderate cognitive impairment). The MDS reflected Resident#2 required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene and partial/ moderate assistance to transfer off the toilet. The Care Plan for Resident#2 dated 8/8/24 directed assist of one staff for transfers, ambulation with walker and toileting. A facility document titled #408 Alleged Abuse dated 3/4/25, Resident#2 reported one of the CNA slammed her down on the toilet over the weekend. The document showed the facility asked eight residents about the care staff provided at the facility. During an interview on 3/4/25 at 12:52 PM, Resident#2 reported one CNA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,062 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,062 — penalty dated 2023-11-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $102K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA