Good Shepherd Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 170 beds and averages 147.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, family, physician, emergency medical personnel, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement interventions in a timely manner for a resident following a fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility failed to intervene after Resident #3 fell and complained instantly of new pain to his ribs. Despite, the family's frequent questioning about Resident #3's situation, the facility failed to send him to the hospital for 2 hours and 36 minutes following his fall. The facility's policy requires someone from nursing management to assess a resident following an incident. It took the nursing supervisor approximately 1 hours after Resident #3 fell for the nursing supervisor assessed Resident #3. Following the nursing supervisor's assessment requested by Resident #3's family, the nursing supervisor attempted to contact the physician for an order to send him to the hospital. Resident #3 transferred to the hospital approximately 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-03-13 · tag F0713 — isolated
  Provide or arrange emergency care by a doctor 24 hours a day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy/procedure review at the time of the investigation, the facility failed to intervene timely for a resident who needed had a change in condition following a fall on 2/3/25 for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #2). At Resident #2's admission in December 2024, he came to the facility with a repaired fractured right hip due to a fall at home. Due to his cognition, he frequently forgot he previously had a hip fracture and would frequently transfer by himself. On 2/3/25, he had an unwitnessed fall. When the nurse assessed him, he reported pain to his right hip. After the nurse's assessment, 2 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) assisted Resident #2 from the floor and back into bed. Despite Resident #2's recent surgical repair of his right hip, the nurse faxed the physician instead of sending him for evaluation. Resident #2 continued to report pain during the nurses' assessments to his right hip and needed assistance of 2 staff for transfers.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, family, and staff interviews the facility failed to do a timely assessment on 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Resident #1 had a bruise on the right inner/outer thigh and hip area. The facility staff knew about the bruise on 2/13/26, and 2/14/26, which no staff assessed the area until 2/15/26 when the resident started to complain of pain. The facility reported a census of 150 residents.Findings include: Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate impaired cognitive decisions. Resident #1 could understand others and others understood them. They had adequate hearing, and vision. Resident #1 required total staff assistance with toileting and substantial to maximal assistance with hygiene and dressing. The MDS included diagnoses of hypertension (a condition where blood consistently pushes hard against artery walls), Alzheimer's Disease,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent weight loss and implement adequate hydration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for weight loss and hydration (Resident #2). The facility identified a census of 150 residents.Findings include:Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified short- and long-term memory problems with severely impaired decision-making abilities. Resident #2 required supervision for eating/drinking. The MDS listed Resident #2 at 230 pounds with no weight loss. The MDS included diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's and depression.The Care Plan Focus initiated dated 4/13/23, indicated Resident #2 had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to Alzheimer's/Parkinson's. The Interventions instructed the following:a. If you notice Resident #2 not eating or distracted at meal times, please sit with them and offer to assist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the windows for 2 of 2 bird aviaries were maintained in between routine cleanings and kept free of excessive bird feces. The facility reported a census of 145 residents. Findings include: Observation on 12/11/25 at 10:45 AM the Memory Care bird aviary consisted of 8 windows. All windows had multiple areas with white bird feces on it. Observation on 12/11/25 at 10:40 AM the Dining Room bird aviary consisted of 8 windows. All windows had multiple areas with white bird feces on itReview of the Aviary Service Checklist dated 7/30/25 documented the Memory Care aviary and Dining Room aviary last cleaned on 7/30/25.In an interview on 12/11/25 at 11:53 AM with the Administrator revealed the facility has a contracted a company from another state that provides quarterly cleaning to the aviaries. She informed in-between quarterly cleanings no one cleans or goes inside the aviary unless something urgent need to be done.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0868 — pattern
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director attended the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings quarterly. The facility reported a census of 145 residents. Findings include:The Quality Assurance (QA) Meeting Records provided by the facility revealed the Medical Director attended the QA meetings on 5/21/25 and 7/28/25 but not on the 1st quarterly meeting (3/20/25) or the 4th quarterly meeting (10/15/25). The facility failed to have the required members present at least quarterly for the facility's QA meetings.In an interview on 12/11/25 at 12:00 PM the Administrator reviewed the Quality Assurance Meeting Records and acknowledged that the Medical Director was not present at the 3/20/25 and 10/15/25 QA meetings. On 12/11/25 at 12:00 PM the Administrator stated that she is familiar with the QA committee meeting quarterly and the need for members to be present. In an interview on 12/11/25 at 12:00 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed the Quality Assurance Meeting Records and acknowledged the Medical Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify resident's representative in advance of the risks and benefits of a psychotropic medication, the treatment alternatives or other options and was able to choose the option the representative prefers for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 145 residents. Findings include: Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of dementia, diabetes and respiratory failure. Physician order dated 11/17/25 for quetiapine (antipsychotic medicine that works in the brain) by mouth once daily as needed for aggression and agitation. Resident #1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) lacked documentation of notifying the resident's representative in advance of the risks and benefits of the medication, treatment alternatives or other options and let them choose the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and family interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents personal belongings were retained in the facility and returned to the family after their death (Resident #159). The facility reported a census of 145 residents.Facility staff implemented immediate interventions on [DATE] and completed on [DATE] through the following actions:a. Discussion with facility staff on where the missing items went and identifying a miscommunication occurred with facility staff.b. Offered the family to replace the items at the facilities expense.The deficient practice was identified as past non-compliance singular event as of [DATE], the items were thrown away due to miscommunication prior to the survey, and financial compensation was offered to the family. Findings include:The Facility Death Record for Resident #159 documented she died on [DATE] at 1:50 PM.The Communication - with family/NOK/POA note dated [DATE] at 11:34 AM indicated the family hadn't finished with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to submit a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 of 2 residents with new mental health diagnoses (Resident #22). The facility reported a census of 145 residents.Findings include:Resident #22's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included diagnoses of anxiety, depression and psychotic disorder.The Electronic Health Record (EHR) listed a generalized anxiety disorder diagnosis added 5/14/19. In addition, an unspecified moderate dementia with other behavioral disturbance and unspecified psychosis diagnoses added 10/9/23.The Physician's Orders indicated that quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication) 25 milligrams two times daily started 2/7/23.Resident #22's Level I PASRR dated 10/21/18 lacked diagnoses of generalized anxiety disorder, unspecified moderate dementia with other behavioral disturbance and unspecified psychosis.Resident #24's clinical record lacked a PASRR after 10/21/18. In an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy/procedure review, and staff interview the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 out of 3 resident reviewed. (Resident #2). The facility identified a census of 151 residents. Findings include: Resident #2's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating severely impaired cognition., documented diagnoses for which included Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), diabetes mellitus, arthritis, recent hip fracture and mild cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #2 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 for which indicated severe memory impairments, is able to be understood and understand by others, and displayed verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, (threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others) other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, Resident [NAME] of Rights, facility investigation, staff interview, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Department of Inspection and Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2) within the required 2-hour timeframe. Staff A, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), alleged the witnessed Staff B, CNA, hit Resident #2 on 3/7/25. Staff A failed to report the incident to the facility until 3/8/25, after the 2-hour window when they witnessed the alleged incident. The facility reported a census of 151 residents. Findings include: Resident #2's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating severely impaired cognition., documented diagnoses for which included Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), diabetes mellitus, arthritis, recent hip fracture and mild cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #2 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record view, staff interview, and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to transmit 1 of 1 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for the facility within the required timeframe (Resident #34). The facility reported a census of 159 residents. Findings include: The Discharge summary dated [DATE] at 1:00 PM reflected Resident #34 discharged to home. The Clinical - MDS reviewed on 10/29/24 at 12:37 PM listed the MDS' completed on 6/1/24 and 6/26/24 as completed, indicating they didn't get transmitted yet. The previous MDS' indicated accepted, indicating the facility transmitted them. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 1:16 PM, Staff H, Registered Nurse/Care Plan Nurse, reported she completed Resident #34's discharge MDS. She reported she didn't submit the MDS to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and she should have. On 10/29.24 at 3:29 PM, the Administrator reported the facility didn't have a policy for MDS submissions. She reported the facility followed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$87,458 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $87,458 — penalty dated 2024-08-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA