Story Medical Senior Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 58.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.34 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.14 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.28 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, family interview and policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation and take steps to ensure resident safety after alleged abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented diagnoses to include debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, heart failure, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, unspecified macular degeneration, anxiety disorder and depression. The resident was dependent on toileting hygiene and required substantial/maximal assistance with toilet transfer. The Care Plan for Resident #1, revised on 4/11/25, included a focus area: resident unable to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) independently. The Care Plan instructed staff under interventions: the resident required an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, family interview and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of alleged abuse to the State survey and certification agency for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented diagnoses to include debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, heart failure, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, unspecified macular degeneration, anxiety disorder and depression. The resident was dependent on toileting hygiene and required substantial/maximal assistance with toilet transfer. The Care Plan for Resident #1, revised on 4/11/25, included a focus area: resident unable to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) independently. The Care Plan instructed staff under interventions: the resident required assistance of 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to submit a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR) evaluation for 1 of 1 residents reviewed with a new mental health diagnosis and initiation of a psychotropic medication (Resident #17). The facility reported a census of 54 residents. Findings include: Resident #17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included a diagnosis of delusional disorder. The MDS reflected Resident #17 received an antidepressant on a routine basis during the lookback period. The Care Plan initiated 5/24/24 indicated Resident #17 received the antidepressant Lexapro due to his diagnosis of delusions and anxiety. The Care Plan goal indicated Resident #17 would not have any adverse effects from the medication. Resident #17's Medical Diagnoses reviewed 4/1/25 included a diagnosis of delusional disorders effective 5/24/24. Resident #17's PASRR completed 9/25/23 listed a completed negative Level 1 screening. The PASRR lacked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, facility staff interview, and facility policy the facility failed to meet professional standards of food service sanitation during meal service. The facility reported a census of 48. Findings include: On 5/8/24 at 11:45 AM during an observation of the meal service on first floor dining room, witnessed Staff B, Cook, remove the stainless steel covering off the food and placed the lids upright, alongside the cabinet, behind the steam table. The lids touched the floor. Interview on 5/8/24 at 12:30 PM Staff A, Dietitian, reported the covers are usually set alongside the food on the table. Staff B didn't place the lids appropriately. Staff A explained the Dietary Manager ensured training on food service and sanitation. Interview on 5/8/24 at 5:00 PM with the Administrator who said the staff should keep the lids sanitary and not touch the floor. Interview on 5/9/24 at 8:30 AM Staff B explained the steam table didn't have enough room for the lids and she didn't know where else to place them. Interview on 5/9/24 at 8:47 AM Staff C, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0943 — pattern
  Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on personnel file review, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to assure 3 of 5 staff met the requirements for Mandatory Adult Abuse Training (Staff D, Staff E, and Staff F). The facility reported a census for 48 residents. Findings include: The New Hires Since Last Survey Form provided by the facility listed the following staff with hire dates: a. Staff D, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA): 5/22/23. b. Staff E, Food Nutrition Services (FNS): 6/13/23. c. Staff F, FNS: 7/7/23. Staff D's personnel file lacked a two-hour Dependent Adult Abuse Mandatory Reporter Training until 1/24/24. Staff D's Dependent Adult Abuse Mandatory Reporter Training required completion by 11/22/23. Staff E's personnel file lacked a completed two-hour Dependent Adult Abuse Mandatory Reporter. Staff E's Dependent Adult Abuse Mandatory Reporter Training required completion by 12/13/23. Staff F's personnel file review lacked a 2-hour Dependent Adult Abuse Mandatory Reporter training. Staff F's Dependent Adult Abuse Mandatory Reporter Training required completion by 1/7/24. Th Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in IA