Oakland Manor
737 North Highway St., Oakland, IA 51560 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 61 certified beds · (712) 482-6403 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,593 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-31)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.4% | 17.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 4.6% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.3% | 4.2% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 3.8% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 33.0% | 16.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.8% | 20.8% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.1% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.2% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.4% | 19.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.0% | 73.3% | 79.4% | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.3%CMS range 37.0–66.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 6.7–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 33.2 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
67 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record review and staff file review, the facility failed to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents. Resident #36 slid from her wheelchair while being transported to an appointment in the facility van. The staff failed to ensure that the resident was stabilized by applying the shoulder strap of the seat belt. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #36 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (moderate cognitive deficits). She required substantial assistance with dressing, toileting, hygiene, and was totally dependent on staff for transfers. Her diagnoses included: peripheral vascular disease, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, low back pain and unsteadiness on feet. The Care Plan updated on 6/9/25, showed that Resident #36 was at risk for falls and on 5/14/25, she had a fall from the wheelchair, sustained an abrasion to the left knee, treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic medical record (EMR) review, resident interview, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide care and service to an individual with a feeding tube resulting in complication of enteral feeding and medication administration for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility failed to identify the skills and abilities needed of the direct care staff when providing enteral medications to the resident resulting in 4 hospital visits including 3 overnight stays within 4 weeks. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 4/18/25 revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15 indicating moderate cognitive deficit. The document revealed diagnoses of cancer, anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder, spinal stenosis, oral phase dysphagia, and pharyngeal phase dysphagia. The document revealed that while a resident of the facility and within the last 7 days the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, CDC guidelines, staff interviews, physician interview and facility policy review the facility failed to provide timely assessments and interventions for 3 of 13 residents reviewed (Resident #46, #8 and #37). Resident #46 had a urinary tract infection (UTI) and was on an antibiotic. Staff failed to conduct daily vital signs and did not contact the provider when his condition worsened. The resident went to the hospital in septic shock due to a kidney infection. Daily skilled nurse charting for Resident #8 and Resident #37 showed that staff used vital signs from previous days. The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #46 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15 (severe cognitive deficits). The MDS documented he was totally dependent on 2 staff for transferring, dressing and toileting. The Care Plan updated on 7/31/23 documented the resident had altered nutritional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, facility investigative file review, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) were free from misappropriation of their medication. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. According to Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 2/3/2026, she had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8. A BIMS score of 8 suggested mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #1 received a scheduled pain medication regimen, received an as needed (PRN) pain medications or was offered and declined. Resident #1 reported no pain during the MDS assessment. The MDS listed the following diagnoses: Parkinson's disease, renal failure, stroke, depression, atrial fibrillation, fusion of cervical and lumbar spine.A Care Plan Focus Area with a revision date of 12/4/2025 documented Resident #1 had chronic pain and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility investigative file review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency no later than 2 hours after the allegation of abuse was suspected. The facility reported a census of 33 residents.Findings include: 1. According to Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 2/3/2026, she had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8. A BIMS score of 8 suggested mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #1 received a scheduled pain medication regimen, received an as needed (PRN) pain medications or was offered and declined. Resident #1 reported no pain during the MDS assessment. The MDS listed the following diagnoses: Parkinson's disease, renal failure, stroke, depression, atrial fibrillation, fusion of cervical and lumbar spine. A Care Plan Focus Area with a revision date of 12/4/2025 documented Resident #1 had chronic pain and increased risk for injury from decreased function related to a diagnosis of spinal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility investigative file review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to store narcotics to minimize loss when 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) discontinued narcotic pain medication remained in the medication cart for almost 6 months. This resulted the in pills being misappropriated by a facility staff member. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Findings include: According to Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 2/3/2026, she had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8. A BIMS score of 8 suggested mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #1 received a scheduled pain medication regimen, received an as needed (PRN) pain medications or was offered and declined. Resident #1 reported no pain during the MDS assessment. The MDS listed the following diagnoses: Parkinson's disease, renal failure, stroke, depression, atrial fibrillation, fusion of cervical and lumbar spine.A Care Plan Focus Area with a revision date of 12/4/2025 documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to accurately document a skin assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed with a pressure ulcer. The facility also failed to complete proper hand hygiene while completing a treatment to Resident #1's pressure ulcer. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include:According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 12/11/2025 documented Resident #1 had a Brief of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. A BIMS score of 15 suggested no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented he did not reject evaluation or care during the 5-day review period. Resident #1 had impairments to bilateral lower extremities and utilized a wheelchair. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for toilet hygiene, lower body dressing, and chair/bed to chair transfer. He required partial/moderate assistance of staff for rolling left to right. The MDS documented he had a urostomy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment free of possible hazards. The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Findings include: On 1/05/2026 at 10:50 am to 11:00 AM observation of the facilities main dining room, activities area, hallways surrounding the nurses station revealed several mismatching paint patterns on the walls after drywall repairs. Door frames between 3 main residential hallways and most of the residential rooms displayed chipped paint revealing varies color patterns and sharp edges from the excessive dents, scuffs, and scratches. Many doors with kickplates attached to the lower half corners revealed corners were no longer adhering to the doors, revealing broken and sharp edges. Near the nurses desk, a hallway leading to the dining room revealed on the right side of the entrance a wall edge molding pulled away from the corner, hanging loosely and had a small black nail attached to it. During an interview with the Maintenance Director on 1/06/2026 at 3:00 pm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic health record (EHR) review, resident interviews, observations, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide an opportunity for a comprehensive care plan to be reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team composed of a resident and/or resident representative to allow developing the care plan and making decisions about his or her care and follow existing care plan interventions to 5 of 12 residents reviewed (Resident #2, #6, #24, #31 and #38). The facility reported a census of 32 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 1/5/26 at 2:05 PM Resident #2 stated the facility does not invite him to participate in care conferences and he would if he was asked. On 1/6/26 at 12:22 PM Staff E, Social Services Supervisor stated Resident #2's POA is on vacation and will schedule the care conference for January 21st. Staff E stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, resident interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide quality nursing care by not completing assessments related to symptomatic positive influenza A diagnosis and symptomatic respiratory illness or having interventions in place related to the illness for 4 of 4 resident reviewed (Resident #8, #9, #28 and #38). The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #8 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented diagnoses of quadriplegia, generalized muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. On 1/5/26 at 1:00 PM Resident #8 stated he had a cough for the last couple days but was getting over it and also some loose stools. Resident #8 stated the facility had not asked him to isolate in his room or wear a mask. Resident #8 stated the illness had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM) services to a resident with limited ROM to prevent further decrease in range of motion or development of contractures for 1 of 14 residents reviewed (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 32.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #8 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented diagnoses of quadriplegia, generalized muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. On 1/5/26 at 1:00 PM Resident #8 stated he does not have a restorative program or see therapy but would like to participate in therapy. Review of Resident #8's EHR documented no restorative, occupational, or physical therapy plans.On 1/7/26 at 2:16 PM Staff I, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADO) stated there is no restorative program at the facility. On 1/7/26 at 2:19 PM Staff L,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, observation, resident interviews, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide adequate response from nursing staff to assure residents safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner for 2 of 12 residents reviewed (Resident #6 and #16). The facility reported a census of 32 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #16 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented Resident #16 was always incontinent of urine and bowels. On 1/5/26 at 3:05 PM Resident #16 stated it frequently takes longer than 15 minutes to answer the call light. Resident #16 stated staff not answering call lights within 15 minutes happened frequently on both shifts equally. 2. During continuous observation on 1/5/26 at 12:46 PM until 1:02 PM (16 minutes) a call light was observed to be unanswered in the East hallway. Review of Resident #6's MDS dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility document review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to employ a clinically qualified nutrition professional by not having a certified dietary manager (CDM). The facility reported a census of 32 residents.Findings include: Interview 1/05/2026 at 10:20 AM with the Dietary Manager revealed that she does not have a CDM. The Dietary Manager then revealed that since the company was bought out that she had to stop taking the classes in September of last year. The Dietary Manager then revealed that when they get more staff in the kitchen she would go back to more office work, and restart the classes. Interview 1/07/2026 at 8:42 AM with the Administrator revealed that he would expect the dietary manager to have a CDM certificate, and to finish the classes required. Follow up interview 1/07/2026 at 1:23 PM with the Administrator revealed he was unsure if there was a policy related to CDM, but his expectation would be for the dietary manager to have the appropriate education to be the CDM.Review of a facility provided document titled, Dietary Manager-Job Description…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 54 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, policy review, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when providing care to a resident with an indwelling catheter and a nephrostomy tube that was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), failed to appropriately wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the sorting of laundry and failed to provide appropriated infection control standards for an outbreak of influenza A at the facility for 5 of 5 resident reviewed (Resident #8, #9, #28, #31 and #38). The facility reported a census of 32 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #8 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented diagnoses of quadriplegia, generalized muscle weakness, presence of urogenital implant and need for assistance with personal care. On 1/5/26 at 1:00 PM Resident #8 stated he had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, policy review, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to provide dignity and respect to 2 of 14 residents reviewed (Resident #8 and #12). The facility reported a census of 32 residents.Finding include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #8 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented diagnoses of quadriplegia, generalized muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. An observation on 1/5/26 at 1:19 PM Staff C, Certified Nurse Assistant leave room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff C walked down the hall to join another CNA in room [ROOM NUMBER]. An observation of Resident #8 in bed with no sheets or clothes only a brief on. Staff D, Activities Director knocked on the door on 1/5/26 at 1:28 PM and entered the room. Staff D delivered mail to Resident #8. On 1/5/26 at 1:29 PM Staff C walked down the hall from room [ROOM NUMBER] to room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to identify non-pharmacological interventions and targeted behaviors related to high risk medications in 3 out of 5 sampled residents reviewed (Resident #5, #12, #20). The facility reported a census of 32 residents.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) date 12/9/25 revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS showed Resident #5 also took antidepressant medication during the review period. The MDS further revealed diagnoses of depression, diabetes, and respiratory failure.Review of Resident #5's Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) page titled Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed an order dated 9/19/26 for Citalopram 30 mg daily for major depressive disorder.Review of the Care Plan for Resident #5 with a revised date of 12/15/25 lacked non-pharmacological interventions and targeted behaviors with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, documentation reviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and report immediately alleged violations related to mistreatment of 1 resident (Resident #12) out of 8 reviewed. The facility reported a census of 32 residents.Findings include:Review of Resident #12's MDS dated [DATE] documented an admission to the facility on 6/30/25 and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 08 indicating moderate cognitive impairment The MDS documented the following diagnoses: hemiplegia, diabetes, and depression. The MDS revealed Resident #12 depended on staff for total assistance with personal hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, and bathing. During an interview with Resident #12 on 1/7/2026 at 4:15 pm she stated Staff P, CNA recently slapped her upper leg while putting her feet up in bed. She stated she was attempting to get out of bed and Staff P noticed her while walking by her room, she then entered her room, was very mean verbally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to obtain bed hold notifications for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #40) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 32 residents.Findings Include: Review of Resident #40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed diagnoses of anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, adult failure to thrive, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #40's EHR page titled, Progress Notes revealed an entry dated 12/31/25 documenting that Resident #40 was transferred to the emergency room for evaluation. Further review of the progress notes revealed an entry dated 1/5/26 that Resident #40 was re-admitted back to the facility from a hospital stay. Review of the EHR page titled, Clinical Census revealed that Resident #40 had been in the hospital from [DATE] until 1/5/26. Interview on 1/8/26 at 9:22 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Resident #40 was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. The DON then confirmed that no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to refer a resident with a negative Level I result for the Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), who had an identified mental disorder, intellectual disability, or other related condition that was not addressed on PASRR completed prior to admission to the facility, to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination for 1 resident (Resident #24) reviewed for PASRR requirements. The facility reported a census of 32 residents.Finding include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #24 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #24 had a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) dated 2/7/25. The MDS documented Resident #24's admission date of 2/7/25.Review of document dated 1/30/25 titled, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review documented no diagnosis of PTSD under the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #27, #42) requiring the use of oxygen. The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, Parkinson's disease, and depression. The Progress Notes in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented Resident #27 started receiving hospice services and was prescribed oxygen therapy via nasal cannula for comfort. An observation on 1/5/25 at 2:25 pm revealed oxygen was delivered via nasal cannula and the tubing attached to the oxygen concentrator located near the bed. The concentrator was turned on and set to deliver 2L/min of oxygen. The tubing did not have a label with the start date and staff initials. The tubing appeared flattened due to being jammed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to separate Resident #1 and Resident #3 to prevent a resident-to-resident altercation. The facility reported a census of 39 residents.Findings Include:1) According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 9/13/2025, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3. A BIMS score of 3 suggested severe cognitive impairment. The MDS listed the following diagnosis for Resident #1: hypertensive heart disease, anemia, renal failure, psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia), mild cognitive impairment, insomnia, and metabolic encephalopathy.A Care Plan Focus Area with an initiation date of 1/15/2025 documented Resident #1 had a history or potential for delusions due to her cognitive status. The care plan documented she is redirectable, her short-term memory is impaired so diverting her attention can be effective. The care plan directed staff to reorient Resident #1 to her surroundings and situation.Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility investigative file review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation after an altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2 on 10/17/2025 and between Resident #1 and Resident #3 on 10/18/2025. The facility reported a census of 39 residents.Findings Include:1) According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 9/13/2025, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3. A BIMS score of 3 suggested severe cognitive impairment. The MDS listed the following diagnosis for Resident #1: hypertensive heart disease, anemia, renal failure, psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia), mild cognitive impairment, insomnia, and metabolic encephalopathy.A Care Plan Focus Area with an initiation date of 1/15/2025 documented Resident #1 had a history or potential for delusions due to her cognitive status. The care plan documented she is redirectable, her short-term memory is impaired so diverting her attention can be effective. The care plan directed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, facility document review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide proper supervision for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). On 10/17/2025 Resident #1 had an altercation with Resident #2 and was placed on one-to-one supervision. On 10/18/2025 staff failed to provide one-to-one supervision which resulted in an altercation involving Resident #1 and Resident #3. The facility reported a census of 39 residents.According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 9/13/2025, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3. A BIMS score of 3 suggested severe cognitive impairment. The MDS listed the following diagnosis for Resident #1: hypertensive heart disease, anemia, renal failure, psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia), mild cognitive impairment, insomnia, and metabolic encephalopathy.A Care Plan Focus Area with an initiation date of 1/15/2025 documented Resident #1 had a history or potential for delusions due to her cognitive status. The care plan documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility investigative file review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse between 2 residents reviewed (Resident #1 and #2) to the appropriate management staff member. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 9/11/2025 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. A BIMS score of 10 suggested mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the following diagnoses: dementia, neurogenic bladder, schizophrenia, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).The Care Plan Focus Area with a revision date of 7/1/2022 documented Resident #1 had impaired cognitive function and impaired thought process due to his diagnoses of dementia and schizophrenia.A Progress Note documented on 9/27/2025 at 1:27 PM: between 11:00 AM and 11:30 AM Resident #1 began to become more agitated while sitting at the smoking doors, yelling out at staff stating let me out of this f*ing place, I want to go…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to update 2 of 3 resident's care plans (Resident #1 and Resident #2) after they were involved in a resident to resident altercation. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:1) According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 9/11/2025 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. A BIMS score of 10 suggested mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the following diagnoses: dementia, neurogenic bladder, schizophrenia, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).A Progress Note documented on 9/27/2025 at 1:27 PM: between 11:00 AM and 11:30 AM Resident #1 began to become more agitated while sitting at the smoking doors, yelling out at staff stating let me out of this f*ing place, I want to go back to council bluffs. This nurse and a Certified Nursing Assistant CNA) came up to resident, said CNA attempted to push resident in his wheelchair but he grabbed the CNA's hand, ripping off her finger nail. Resident began to laugh,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0560 — patternProtect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to notify residents or resident representatives of room change decisions, or provide explanation for the changes for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (#19, #17, #8, #1). The facility reported a census of 47 residentsFindings include:1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 (severe cognitive deficit). She required partial assistance with dressing and hygiene and supervision only with walking and transferring. Resident #19 had daily wandering activity. The Care Plan for Resident #19, updated on 5/21/25, showed that she had the potential for eloping and staff were to remind her of the location of her room. The resident had a verbal altercation with another resident while rummaging through the wrong room, staff were to intervene as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others. During an ongoing observation on 7/1/25 at 3:40 PM, Resident #19 wandered throughout…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reviews, and policy review the facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative when a change in medical condition and/or treatment occurred for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #14, Resident #19, Resident #18). The facility failed to notify a resident Power of Attorney (POA) of a positive Covid test, a resident's POA of a fall, a physician of oral and enteral feeding refusals with the resident having continued weight loss, and a resident's POA of a psychotropic medication change. The facility had a census of 47. Findings include:1) The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 4/18/25 revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15 indicating moderate cognitive deficit. The document revealed diagnoses of cancer, anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder, spinal stenosis, oral phase dysphagia and pharyngeal phase dysphagia. The document revealed that while a resident of the facility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee file review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to complete additional research for 1 of 3 employees (Staff D CNA) when her background check indicated it required additional research. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include:Review of Staff D Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) employee file reviewed the following:-a hired date of 4/22/2022-a Single Contact License and Background Check was completed on 4/27/2022 at 12:01 PM. The background check documented further research was required.Staff D's employee file lacked the Department of Human Services (DHS) release that indicated she would be able or not able to work in the facility following further research in to her criminal history research. During an email correspondence on 7/3/2025 at 11:30 AM the Administrator indicated she was unable to track down Staff D's DHS work letter. On 7/8/2025 at 2:10 PM the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) stated Human Resource (HR) staff completes the background checks. Now that they do not have someone in HR it will be the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the previous Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) form 2567 review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure they provided a comprehensive, effective Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include:A review of the Department of Inspections, Appeals, and Licensing website revealed the facility had repeat deficient practices identified during the annual, revisit surveys and complaint investigations from 12/20/2021 to 12/23/2024. The repeat deficiencies cited include:-12/20/2021 during a complaint investigation: 580 Notification of Changes, 684 Quality of Care, 693 Tube Feeding Management, and 880 Infection Control-3/25/2022 during a revisit survey: 880 Infection Control-6/3/2022 during a recertification and complaint survey: 580 Notification of Changes, 607 Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect, etc Policies, 689 Accidents and Hazards, 692 Nutrition/Hydration Status Maintenance-8/31/2023 during a recertification survey: 657 Care Plan Timing and Revision, 684…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, facility investigative file review, and facility policy review. The facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 residents (Resident #31 and #34) were free from abuse. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include:1. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 2/21/2025 documented Resident #31 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4. A BIMS score of 4 suggested she had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Resident #31 required substantial/maximal assistance for person hygiene (including combing her hair). The MDS listed the following diagnoses for Resident #31: hypertensive urgency, pneumonia, non-Alzheimer's dementia, adult failure to thrive, and dysphagia. The Care Plan Focus Area with an initiated date of 8/15/2024 documented Resident #31 has Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care deficit. The Care Plan documented she required the assistance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility investigative file review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to report a reportable incident to the State Agency within 2 hours of the alleged incident. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include:According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 4/17/2025 documented Resident #31 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4. A BIMS score of 4 suggested she had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Resident #31 required substantial/maximal assistance for person hygiene (including combing her hair). The MDS listed the following diagnoses for Resident #31: hypertensive urgency, pneumonia, non-Alzheimer's dementia, adult failure to thrive, and dysphagia. The Care Plan Focus Area with an initiated date of 8/15/2024 documented Resident #31 has Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care deficit. The Care Plan documented she required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and policy review the facility failed to review and revise the Care Plans for 2 of 36 residents reviewed (Resident #1 and Resident #34). The facility failed to revise the Interventions for a resident who received oral and enteral intake, and the Goals and Interventions for 2 residents for intimate relations. The facility reported a census of 47 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 4/18/25 revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15 indicating moderate cognitive deficit. The document revealed diagnoses of cancer, anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder, spinal stenosis, oral phase dysphagia and pharyngeal phase dysphagia. The document revealed that while a resident of the facility and within the last 7 days the resident had a feeding tube and mechanically altered diet. Resident #1's Care Plan dated 6/4/25 revealed an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Self Care Performance Focus Area dated 10/17/23 with an intervention for staff that the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide services meeting professional standards for 1 of 36 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility failed to enter orders on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) - Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for correct route, complete and document physician orders on the MAR - TAR, and follow physician orders for interventions required during oral intake. The facility had a census of 47. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 4/18/25 revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15 indicating moderate cognitive deficit. The document revealed diagnoses of cancer, anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder, spinal stenosis, oral phase dysphagia and pharyngeal phase dysphagia. The document revealed that while a resident of the facility and within the last 7 days the resident had a feeding tube and mechanically altered diet. The assessment revealed the resident did not have a 5% weight loss in the past month…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received baths per preference for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. Resident #32 a paraplegia was unable to sit in the shower chair due to lack of trunk support. Staff were providing bed baths only. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include:According to Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another nursing home. He had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 (moderate cognitive deficits.) He was impaired on both sides upper and lower extremities, and had an indwelling urinary catheter. He was totally dependent on staff for hygiene showers, dressing and transfers and used a motorized wheel chair for mobility. The residents' diagnoses included: neurogenic bladder, paraplegia, recurrent dislocation of left hip, pressure ulcer of sacral region, insomnia and adult failure to thrive. The Care Plan dated 5/29/25, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, provider interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received adequate and timely assessments and interventions for 2 of 12 residents reviewed (Residents #23 and #31). Staff failed to consistently monitor Resident #23 for side effects from psychotropic medications, and failed to complete neurological assessments after Resident #31 had an unwitnessed fall. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include:1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #23 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 (moderate cognitive deficits). The resident required supervision with hygiene, dressing, toileting and transfers. Her diagnoses included: anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, chronic pain disorder, opioid dependence. The high-risk medication included: antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, and opioids.The Care Plan for Resident #23 updated on 3/20/25, showed that she had a history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that they monitored urine output for residents with urinary catheter and were at risk for urinary tract infections for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #32.) The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 (moderate cognitive deficits.) The resident was totally dependent and on staff for toileting hygiene, showers, dressing and transfers. He was always incontinent of bowel, and had a urinary catheter. His diagnoses included: neurogenic bladder, paraplegia and adult failure to thrive. The Care Plan dated 5/2/25, showed that Resident #32 had self-care performance deficit and required staff assistance to turn and reposition in bed. The resident had a suprapubic catheter due to diagnosis of neurogenic bladder. Staff were to monitor for signs and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on electronic medical record (EMR) review, staff interviews, provider interview and policy review the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to stabilize or improve a resident's nutritional status before complications arose for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #1). The facility failed to monitor enteral and oral intake, respond to continuous weight loss over a 7 month period, and develop an integrated approach to the progression of enteral intake to oral intake. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 4/18/25 revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15 indicating moderate cognitive deficit. The document revealed diagnoses of cancer, anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder, spinal stenosis, oral phase dysphagia, and pharyngeal phase dysphagia. The document revealed that while a resident of the facility and within the last 7 days the resident had a feeding tube and mechanically altered diet. The assessment revealed the resident did not have a 5% weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, Electronic Health Record (EHR) reviews, staff interviews, and policy reviews the facility failed to implement appropriate hand hygiene and infection control practices to mitigate the spread of pathogens during resident cares for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #33, Resident #1, and Resident #32). The facility failed to maintain appropriate placement of catheter bag placement, utilize hand hygiene, appropriate glove use, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The facility reported a census of 47. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #33 dated 7/3/25 in progress revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15 indicating normal cognitive function. The document revealed diagnoses of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)/Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIA), anxiety order, depression, psychotic disorder, Schizophrenia, and Cauda Equina Syndrome. The MDS identified the resident had an indwelling catheter.Resident #33's Care Plan dated 7/2/26 under development revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control practices to mitigate the spread of pathogens and diminish the risk of spreading SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) during an active outbreak. The facility reported a census of 48. Findings include: Observed on 12/23/24 at 9:25 AM upon entry into the facility a sign posted that stated all visitors must wear masks due to Covid. Observed on 12/23/24 at 9:30 AM Staff A, Dietary Cook, stood in the dining room, looked at the front door and back towards the nurses station and said Are we ready? Staff A proceeded to walk through the dining room, to the front door, opened the door, and led the Surveyor through a living room/dining room area, and down a hall to meet Staff G, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator/backup Infection Preventionist (IP). The total distance walked by Staff A was 100 feet. Staff A walked past 5 residents who were not wearing masks. Observed on 12/23/24 at 9:35 AM 14 rooms designated as being COVID-19 positive rooms with Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) hanging…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-21 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report (April 1 - June 30) review, facility staffing reports review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate staff reports for the PBJ Staffing Data Report. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include: The PBJ Staffing Data Report run date 11/13/24 for quarter 3 2024 triggered for excessively low weekend staffing and one star staffing rating. Review of weekend staffing schedules for quarter 3, months of April, May, and June revealed equal staffing during the week and the weekend. On 11/20/24 at 2:01 PM the Administrator stated the facility followed the per patient day (PPD) formula defined in the facility assessment for staff numbers and there is no change in the numbers for staffing on the weekend. The Administrator acknowledged the PBJ was reported inaccurately. The Administrator stated the facility was going to review the PBJ to ensure the reported information was accurate.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the record review, resident interviews, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide access to personal funds managed by the facility or manage personal funds deposited at the facility. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 11/18/24 at 12:13 PM Resident #4 stated he obtained money on Saturday this week from Staff K. Resident #4 stated Staff K worked in the business office across from the Administrator. Resident #4 stated residents could not get the money when the business office was closed. Resident #4 stated he could not get money at night or after the business office closes. Resident #4 stated the bank hours were 9am - 2pm Monday through Friday. 2. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #21 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 11/18/24 at 1:41…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include: On 11/18/24 at 10:00 am, an observation revealed multiple areas of missing or damaged floor tile in the north hall. On 11/19/24, a follow-up observation revealed the flooring tile had not been repaired or replaced. On 11/20/24 at 2:09 pm, the Maintenance Director stated he was responsible for minor repairs but major repairs required a contract company respective to the repair need. He stated cosmetic repairs were entered into a facility application available to all staff but indicated there were no unresolved building repairs. He also stated maintenance rounds were performed on a monthly basis. At 2:17 pm, he stated floor tile repair was a task he could repair and added he had no reason for why it had not been repaired. On 11/21/24 at 1:03 pm, the Corporate Director of Operations stated the facility did not have a policy specifically for homelike…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide food served by a method to maintain a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility reported a census of 51. Findings include: On 11/20/24 at 7:32 am, Staff A, Cook, checked the temperature of the breakfast menu items. The sausage gravy temperature was recorded at 180° Fahrenheit (F). On 11/20/24 at 8:33 am, Staff A checked the temperature of the remaining breakfast items. The sausage gravy temperature was recorded at 130° F. On 11/20/24 at 3:11 pm, the Dietary Manager stated staff should check the food temperatures before, during, and after meal service to ensure the food maintains regulatory temperature. On 11/21/24 at 1:03 pm, the Corporate Director of Operations stated the facility did not have a policy specific to holding temperatures for meal service.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly label stored food, failed to maintain sanitary practices by using the dedicated hand hygiene sink to fill a pitcher of water for resident use, and failed to ensure the appropriate amount of sanitizer solution was used to effectively sanitize food preparation surfaces. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include: On 11/18/24 at 11:15 am, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) was observed using the kitchen hand hygiene sink and filled a pitcher of water for resident use. Staff C, Cook, asked Staff B if she was supposed to use the hand hygiene sink for resident water to which Staff B replied she was instructed to use the (hand hygiene) sink. On 11/20/24 at 6:30 am, a kitchen observation revealed the [NAME] refrigerator contained the following items: a) An unlabeled package of round, pink meat. b) An unlabeled, undated, tan pitcher of liquid in the refrigerator. On 11/20/24 at 6:35 am, the pantry contained the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and policy reviews the facility failed to implement appropriate hand hygiene and infection control practices to mitigate the spread of pathogens during resident cares (Resident #48), medication administration and laundry delivery. The facility reported a census of 51. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #48 dated 10/17/24 identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented diagnoses that included: septicemia, multiple sclerosis, pressure ulcer of right hip, unstageable, bacteremia, neurogenic bladder, urinary tract infection and rhabdomyolysis. Resident #48's Care Plan revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter and a wound to the right hip and coccyx/bilateral buttocks. The Catholic Health Initiatives (CHI) laboratory report dated 10/14/24 revealed the right hip had moderate mixed microbial flora with Moderate Gram Negative Rods (2 colony types) including Probable Proteus species. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to represent an accurate assessment of the resident's status during the observation period of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) by not accurately assessing the use of an anticoagulant, insulin or an indwelling catheter for 3 of 10 residents reviewed (Resident #25, #32 and #48). The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Finding include: 1. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #25 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #25's MDS dated [DATE] documented use of anticoagulant therapy by Resident #25. Review of Resident #25's Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented a physician's order for clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix) oral tablet 75 mg, an anti-platelet. Review of Resident #25's MAR documented no physician order for use of an anti-coagulant. 2. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #32 documented a BIMS score of 15 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a comprehensive care plan that included goals or interventions for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for a resident with a catheter and use of an anti-platelet for 2 of 10 residents reviewed (Resident #25 and #48). The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #25 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #25's Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented a physician's order for clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix) oral tablet 75 mg an anti-platelet. Review of Resident #25's Care Plan documented no focus, goals or interventions for anti-platelet therapy. On 11/19/24 at 1:44 PM the DON stated that Plavix was an antiplatelet. The DON stated Resident #25 should have a Care Plan in place related to the risk for bleeding on the Care Plan. The DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect residents from possible accidents and injuries for 2 of 17 residents (Resident #8, and #15) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set ( MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating normal cognitive function. Section GG, Functional Abilities, disclosed the resident utilized a manual wheelchair (w/c) and required substantial/maximal assistance. Resident #8's Care Plan dated 7/13/24 revealed the resident required the use of a Hoyer for transfers. Observation on 11/19/24 at 11:42 AM revealed Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), pushing Resident #8 in his w/c without foot pedals from his bedroom to the dining room. On 11/19/24 at 11:53 AM Staff E stated she was a contract staff, but had worked here many times. The staff stated she had been provided on training from the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide accurate and timely assessment and interventions. Staff failed to obtain a physician's order for home medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3). Staff failed to adequately assess 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #4), and failed to contact the physician with high blood glucose levels for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #2, #9). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #3 had a BIMS score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). He needed some help with self-care and used a manual wheelchair. Resident #3 required partial assistance with dressing, and toileting. He had an external urinary catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Diagnosis included anemia, obstructive uropathy, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition and schizophrenia. The care plan showed that Resident #3 had been approved for short-term nursing home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0660 — patternPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interview, pharmacy staff interview, home health staff interview, facility staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate discharge planning for 4 of 5 residents reviewed. Facility staff discharged Resident's #1, #3 and #6 without ensuring that they had the needed home medications. Staff discharged Resident #4 without advanced planning or arranging for the needed home health and therapy services. The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (intact cognitive ability). The MDS documented the resident independent with all cares and mobility. His diagnoses included seizure disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, early onset ataxia, alcohol dependence and adult failure to thrive. The MDS documented active discharge planning already occurring for the resident to return to the community…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interviews, resident interview, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to notify resident representatives after falls for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #6, and #4) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 (moderate cognitive deficits). The resident required set-up assistance with hygiene, dressing needs, and supervision for walking and toileting. The resident's diagnoses included coronary artery disease, non- Alzheimer's dementia, encephalopathy, and alcohol dependence with persisting amnestic disorder. The Care Plan updated on 3/18/24, showed that Resident #6 had limited physical mobility related to alcohol abuse and dementia, and the discharge plan was to go home. Staff directed to evaluate and record the resident's abilities. The resident admitted for a short term stay and required therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility policy review the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices related to proper hand hygiene for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. While providing incontinence cares for Resident #7, two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) failed to change their gloves and perform hand hygiene after they had wiped the resident's legs and buttocks. The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #7 had a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (intact cognitive ability). He required substantial assistance with dressing and hygiene and was totally dependent on staff for toileting and bathing. His diagnosis included anemia, coronary artery disease, heart failure renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, and cerebrovascular accident (CVA). The Care Plan updated on 2/29/24, showed that Resident #7 required assistance for meeting emotional intellectual, physical and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to represent an accurate assessment of the resident's status during the observation period of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) by not accurately assessing need for restraints and catheter for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #12, #29, #35, and 41). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Finding include: 1. The MDS for Resident #12 dated 5/25/23 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident used bed rails daily as a physical restraint. The Care Plan for Resident #12 documented the resident has a self-care performance deficit and directed staff that an assistive device placed on her bed to help increase bed mobility and increase independence. It also directed staff that the resident had U bars to bilateral head of the bed. On 8/27/23 at 3:47 PM the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)/MDS coordinator stated she did not understand that portion of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel document review, and staff interviews the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service by not having a qualified professional serve as the dietary manager. The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: Review of personnel records for Staff C, the Dietary Manager, revealed no current certification. During an interview 8/27/23 at 9:53 AM with Staff C revealed that the current Dietary Manager did not have her certification, but was enrolled in the classes. During an interview 8/27/23 at 11:37 AM with the facilities Dietary Manager revealed she does not have education and training completed to be a qualified professional to serve as the Dietary Manager at the facility. During an interview 8/27/23 at 11:37 AM with Staff A revealed she did not have her certification for dietary manager. She further revealed she is enrolled in the classes, but has not started. During an interview 8/27/23 at 3:46 PM with the Administrator revealed her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to prepare, serve and distribute food in accordance with professional standards. The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: During continuous observation on 8/27/23 from 11:25 AM through 12:00 PM Staff D observed washing his hands and then applying gloves. After gloves applied Staff D observed touching cups on the brim of the glass, trays, fridge handles, reaching inside of the fridge for drink cartons, drawer handles, and pouring drinks while wearing the same pair of gloves. Staff D then doffed his gloves and washed his hands. Interview 08/27/23 at 12:00 PM with the facility Dietary Manager revealed her expectation is for good hand hygiene to be completed. The Dietary Manager further revealed her expectation is for staff not to touch everything with the same pair of gloves. Interview 8/27/23 at 3:49 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed her expectation is for staff to change gloves between each task and to complete hand hygiene. Review of provided facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documents, and staff interviews the facility failed to notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a transfer to a hospital for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #37) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed Resident #37 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 7/31/23. Review of a facility provided document titled, Notice of Discharge to Ombudsman, dated July 2023 revealed that Resident #37's hospitalization for 7/10/23 was documented. This document further revealed that Resident #37's hospitalization was not documented for 7/25/23. This document further instructed that this report was to be due by the beginning of the following month. During an interview on 8/30/23 at 3:07 PM with the Administrator revealed her expectation is for notification to the Ombudsman to identify if someone is admitted to the hospital more than once in a month. During an interview 8/30/23 at 4:45 PM with Staff J revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to refer 2 residents for the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), who was later identified with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or other related condition, to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination for 2 out of 5 residents (Resident #18 and #37) reviewed for PASRR requirements. The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #18 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 1 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder. Review of document titled Notice of PASRR Level 2 Outcome revealed completed on 4/25/23. Document also revealed no documentation of schizoaffective disorder review in the mental health diagnosis questions portion of the document. Review of Resident #18's Electronic Health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to update the resident's care plan to accurately reflect the resident for 1 of 23 residents reviewed (Resident #29). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #29 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further documented diagnosis of renal insufficiency, morbid obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #29's Care Plan with revision date of 8/7/2023 lacked information that the resident had an indwelling catheter, lacked staff directives and potential complications. Interview 8/29/23 at 12:50 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed her expectation is for care plans to be updated and revised to match physician orders. Review of the facility provided policy titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan, with a reviewed date of 10/23/2019 instructed: Upon a Change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide enteral tube feeding as appropriate per orders for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #45). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #45 dated 6/6/23 revealed diagnosis of stroke, aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech), hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of the body), and respiratory failure. Observation 8/29/23 at 3:02 PM of Resident #45's feeding pump revealed tube feeding rate noted to be 50 millimeters an hour with 50 milliliters water flush every hour. Review of Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 8/1/2023-8/31/2023 revealed physician order for Glucerna 1.5 50 ml/hr with water flushes at 20 ml/hr to run continuously. Interview 8/29/23 at 3:03 PM with Staff B Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed she paused the feeding earlier to give meds around 9 AM, but did not check the feeding rate of the pump. Observed Staff B adjust the rate of the water at this time.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interviews the facility failed to change oxygen tubing for respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #3) requiring the use of oxygen. The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings included: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #3 dated 6/4/23 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further documented diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory failure, anxiety, morbid obesity, and a need for assistance with personal care. The MDS documented the need for oxygen in the last 14 days. Review of a document titled Clinical Physician Orders dated 9/4/22, revealed a physician's order to change oxygen tubing every night shift on Sundays. During an observation on 8/27/23 at 11:15 AM revealed oxygen tubing connected from the concentrator to the continuous positive airway pressure (cpap) machine was dated 4/2. Interview 8/27/2023 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clincial record review, facility policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide dialysis services consistent with professional standards by not completing a post dialysis assessment to 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #31). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #31 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented diagnosis of end stage renal disease. On 8/30/23 at 11:52 AM Staff B stated the facility's procedure is to take the vitals and give medication prior to Resident #31 leaving. Staff B stated when Resident #31 returns from the dialysis center, the nurse was supposed to complete a post dialysis assessment. Staff B stated the facility's dialysis document no longer has a post assessment portion. Staff B stated post assessment is not documented in electronic health records (EHR). On 8/30/23 at 12:15 PM the ADON stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to provide nursing staff to assure residents safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner. The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 4 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 8/30/23 at 1:50 PM a continuous observation revealed Resident #7's call light on. Continued observation revealed the call light answered by staff at 2:08 PM. On 8/30/23 at 2:08 PM Staff H stated call lights should be answered within one to three minutes. Staff H stated that she thought the CNA's did their best for having three CNA's on the floor. On 8/30/23 at 2:11 PM Resident #7 who resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] stated she turned the call light on to raise her head up in the recliner. On 8/30/23 at 2:29 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility's expectation was call lights to be answered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, pharmacist interview and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure that residents did not have unnecessary medication prescribed for 1 of 5 reviews for narcotic medication use (Resident #30). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #30 was totally dependent on 2 staff for dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. She had diagnosis that included anxiety disorder, depression and psychotic disorder. On 8/29/23 at 8:30 AM observed Certified Medication Aide (CMA), Staff I look through the locked drawer that contained narcotic medications and found that Resident #30 had 31 tabs of lorazepam. According to the Controlled Substance Accountability Sheet Resident #30 had an order for lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) and from 8/9/23 through 8/22/23 the number of tablets had increased from 7 to 31 tabs. Staff I said that the number was increasing because the medication dispenser continued to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility document review, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility failed to properly label and store resident medications according to regulations. In an observation on [DATE], it was discovered that three insulin pens did not have documentation of the date opened and 1 insulin pen was being used passed the recommended 28 days after opening. The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: In an observation of the medication pass on [DATE] at 7:38 AM it was discovered that 3 pens containing insulin in the medication cart did not have the dates open documented. Two of the pens belonged to Resident #29. One contained Insulin Aspart, used three times a day, and the other was Detemir used once a day. A further investigation of the medication cart containing insulins found a Novolog pen for Resident #12 did not have a opened date and a pen for Resident #10 with Novolog was dated [DATE]. According to a screenshot dated [DATE] provided by the facility, from a web…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide a well balanced diet that meets nutritional and special dietary needs for 1 of 10 residents reviewed (Resident #32) The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #32 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed diagnosis of adult failure to thrive and prediabetes. Review of Resident #32's physician orders revealed an order for low concentrated sweets (LCS) diet, regular texture, thin consistency with low sodium and consistent carbohydrate for prediabetes dated 3/30/23. On 8/29/23 at 9:08 AM Staff N stated the kitchen offered smaller portions for dessert otherwise the residents all received the same meals. On 8/29/23 at 9:12 AM Staff A stated diabetics are served low concentrated sweets (LCS) and follow the menu for LCS which is half sized snacks and follow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing and palatable temperature to 3 of 18 residents reviewed (Resident #1, #6, and #40) The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 8/27/23 at 2:41 PM Resident #1 stated the food could be better. Resident #1 stated the food is occasionally cold. 2. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #6 documented a BIMS of 2 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 8/27/23 at 10:44 AM Resident #6 stated she eats her food in her room. Resident #6 stated the food is always cold when it arrives in the room. Resident #6 stated that she just eats it. 3. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #40 documented a BIMS of 15 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 8/28/23 at 9:03 AM Resident #40 stated the food sucks. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide infection control measures to mitigate the spread of pathogens. An observation of the laundry room found that the wash machine chemical pumps were not working and none of the chemicals or soaps were getting into the wash. Observations during food service and during patient care revealed inadequate hand hygiene and lack of appropriate glove use. The facility reported a census of 45 residents Findings include: 1) In an observation of the laundry area on 8/30/23 at 9:14 AM, the Laundry Manager (LM) pointed out two wash machines in the corner of the room. Both of the machines contained full loads of clothing and linens. Behind the machines were 8 pumps on the wall (4 per machine), with tubes that led into buckets of detergent, odor preventative agent, softener and chlorine. The pumps were not moving and there were no lights on them. As the machines ran through the cycle it was observed that none of the liquids were moving through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,593 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $318K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165230. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.