Osceola Senior Living

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 33.0 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement and practice appropriate infection control measures by not establishing or following a routine cleaning schedule for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) equipment for 1 of 13 residents reviewed (Resident #17). The facility also failed to provide staff with current CPAP machine settings. The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #17 documented diagnoses of anemia, coronary artery disease (CAD) and dementia. The MDS indicated Resident #7 used a non-invasive mechanical ventilator. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment.During on interview on 4/1/2026 at 1:45 PM, Resident #17 reported that staff had not cleaned the CPAP equipment since admission. Resident #17 further reported being unaware of the correct CPAP settings and had informed staff that they did not know if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide professional standards of care by not following physician orders to include the updated order and the correct medication end date in the electronic record for 2 out of 12 residents reviewed (Resident #3 and #31). The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #3 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, stroke, and hypertension. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Consultant Pharmacist Report for Resident #3 showed on 2/13/25 the physician reordered the as needed (PRN) lorazepam for a duration of 12 months. The Clinical Physician Orders for Resident #3 showed the PRN lorazepam to be last updated on 1/5/25 with an end date of indefinite. The facility failed to enter the updated order in the electronic record and failed to include the correct end date. 2. The MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident received Oxygen (O2) per the physician's order for 1 resident reviewed (Resident #25). The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #25 scored 12 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and a fracture. The resident did not receive oxygen (O2). The Care Plan initiated 1/8/25 identified the resident with an alteration in tissue perfusion related to Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Atrial-fibrillation, and pulmonary hypertension. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, and monitoring and consulting with the Primary Care Provider (PCP) as needed (PRN). The Progress Notes dated 2/21/25 at 3:42 p.m. documented the Occupational Therapist (OT) reported the resident had poor activity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to address dementia/Alzheimer's Disease care on the care plan for 1 out of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #3 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, stroke, and hypertension. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Care Plan for Resident #3 lacked information regarding the physical, mental and psychosocial needs to support the highest practical level of well being for a resident with Alzheimer's Disease or dementia. In an interview on 3/13/25 at 9:41 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported she expected Alzheimer's Disease to be included in the care plan for Resident #3. The DON reported the facility lacked a policy for Alzheimer's Disease or dementia related to the care plan.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to identify side effects, non-pharmalogical interventions to try prior to medication and specific targeted behaviors related to high risk medications in 2 out of 5 sampled residents reviewed (Resident #3 and #9). The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #3 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, stroke, and hypertension. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Clinical Physician Orders for Resident #3 showed the following orders: a. Lorazepam (antianxiety medication) with a start date of 1/5/25, b. Quetiapine (antipsychotic medication) with a start date of 7/15/24, c. Trazodone (antidepressant medication) with a start date of 7/11/24. The Care Plan for Resident #3 revealed the facility failed to include lorazepam, quetiapine and trazodone in the care plan and failed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to use proper infection control practices when hanging catheter bags for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #19 and #23). The facility also failed to complete proper hand hygiene during urinary catheter care for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #23). The facility reported a total census of 34 residents. Findings include: Observation on 3/11/25 at 9:12 AM showed Resident #19's catheter bag hanging from the garage receptacle. Observation on 3/11/25 at 9:25 AM showed Resident #23's catheter bag hanging from the garage receptacle. Observation on 3/12/25 at 10:04 AM showed Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) applied personal protective equipment (PPE), removed Resident 23's catheter bag from the privacy bag and emptied catheter per policy. Staff A with soiled gloves placed the catheter bag within the privacy bag. Staff A then clamped the catheter bag onto the bed frame, picked up the colander of urine from the floor with the left hand and removed the right glove. Staff A used the soiled right hand to open…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in IA