Methodist Manor Retirement Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 112 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 86.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.04 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.75 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.23 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility record review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent a fall for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Residents #89). The facility reported a total census of 90 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #89 documented diagnoses of hypertension, renal failure, hyperlipidemia and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS revealed Resident #89 utilized a walker daily. Review of facility provided document titled Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] scored a 15 indicating high risk for falls. Review of Resident #89's Care Plan dated 3/28/24 revealed under Assistance of Daily Living (ADL) Resident #89 was assistance of one with a walker for ambulation. Review of facility provided document titled Fall Investigation dated 4/30/24 at 6:15 AM, revealed Resident #89 had a fall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to properly store and label food items with open dates. The facility failed to identify items that were outside of original packaging and did not discard expired items. The facility did not complete appropriate hand hygiene when preparing food in accordance with professional standards. The facility reported a census of 85 residents. Findings include:On 4/13/26 at 11:20 AM during the initial kitchen observation freezer items observed opened without an open date include chicken wings, corn beef, chicken patties, white turkey patties, meat balls, bread dough (rolls), large box of multiple resealable plastic bags of different kinds of frozen meat that were not specified to the type of meat on any of the bags and coffee cake in original plastic container with best by date of 2/13/26.On 4/13/26 at 11:30 AM the walk in freezer revealed vegetable soup in a plastic container with green lid dated 2/4/26, cheese soup in plastic container with green lid dated 2/12/26, strawberry ice cream in an individual cups with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Electronic Health Records (EHR) review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when providing care to a resident with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube, that was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 reviewed (Resident #8) and with missed opportunities for hand hygiene when personal cares were completed on a resident with a catheter for 1 of 3 reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 85 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #3 utilized an indwelling catheter. An observation on 4/15/26 at 9:12 AM of catheter cares completed on Resident #3 by Staff F, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) and Staff G, CNA. The observation revealed Staff F and Staff G applied gowns, complete hand hygiene, apply gloves, obtain warm wash…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely assessment and interventions for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. Resident #1 reported signs and symptoms of a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and staff did not follow through to get a urinalysis (UA) order until 6 days later. The clinical chart lacked vital signs and nursing notes during this timeframe. The facility reported a census of 84 residents.Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 (moderate cognitive deficits) She was totally dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, dressing, and transfers. She was always incontinent of urine and bowel. Her diagnoses included: anemia, dementia, stress incontinence and pain. The Care Plan updated on 1/24/25 showed Resident #1 required staff assistance with activities of daily living. Staff were to check and change and provide peri cares. On 3/16/25 and on 9/13/25 found to have UTI. Staff were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to develop a care plan to address risk factors and interventions for 4 out of 21 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (Residents #21, #73, #33, and #78).The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #21's MDS included diagnoses of non-alzheimer's dementia, depression, alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, restlessness and agitation. The MDS documented Resident #21 was taking antipsychotic medication during the 7 day look back period. A Physician Order dated 9/10/24 directed staff to administer Risperdal (antipsychotic medication) 0.5 MG (milligrams) one time a day related to increased behaviors. Review of the Care Plan with a target date of 6/2/25 revealed the antipsychotic medication, target…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and facility policy review, the facility failed to screen for eligibility, offer, provide education and document vaccine consent or refusal for the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) immunization for 4 of 5 resident reviewed (Resident #12, #21, #40 and #77). The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #12 was not up to date with the COVID-19 vaccination. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #12 had received a COVID vaccination on 10/24/21. The clinical record lacked documentation that Resident #12 or responsible party was educated, offered a consent for or refusal of an additional COVID-19 vaccination since 10/24/21. 2. Resident #21's MDS dated [DATE] assessment identified a BIMS score of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician regarding a change in a resident's condition after a fall (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #5 documented diagnosis of anemia, neurogenic bladder and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. The Progress Notes on 1/23/25 at 9:48 PM revealed a nurse was called to Resident #5's room by the certified nursing assistants(CNA). Resident #5 was noted to be on her left side on the floor. Resident #5 stated she slid forward from her wheelchair prior to transferring to the toilet. Resident #5 stated she landed on her knees and then her left side/hip. Resident #5 received a bruise/contusion to her left hand third digit. Resident #5 denies pain. The facility Progress Notes further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, staff interview, facility investigation review and policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within 2 hours to the Iowa Department of Inspections, Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #21 and #49). The facility also failed to report the allegation of abuse/suspected crime to the law enforcement center. The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: A facility investigation titled Resident to Resident Incident documented that on 3/21/24 during the supper meal Resident #21 was sitting at his table and made a negative comment to Resident #49 as he was walking by to sit in the dining room. Resident #49 heard the comment, made a negative comment back, and went over and slapped Resident #21 on the right side of his neck. The nurse was present, intervened and directed both men away from each other. Review of document titled Intake Information revealed the facility filed an allegation for abuse to DIAL related to a Resident to Resident Altercation for Resident #21 and Resident #49…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 21 residents reviewed (Resident #78). The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: According to the MDS assessment dated [DATE], Resident #78 scored 12 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included schizophrenia. The MDS documented no to question A1500 indicating the resident was not currently considered by the state level 2 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) process to have serious mental illness. The Notice of Level 2 PASRR Outcome dated 8/2/24 documented the resident met inclusion for PASRR based on her diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia and delusional disorder, and her need for help taking care of herself. Since the evaluation determined the resident had a PASRR condition, the facility should mark yes for question A1500 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transition of care for 1 resident reviewed (Resident #78). The facility reported a census of 89 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #78 scored 12 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included schizophrenia. The MDS documented no to question A1500 indicating the resident was not currently considered by the state Level 2 PASRR process to have serious mental illness. The Notice of Level 2 PASRR Outcome dated 8/2/24 documented the resident met inclusion for PASRR based on her diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia and delusional disorder, and her need for help taking care of herself. Since the evaluation determined the resident had a PASRR condition, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to change and label oxygen tubing for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #33). The facility reported a census of 89. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #33 documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, and depression. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Observation on 3/24/25 at 2:03 PM, revealed Resident #33 had a date of 11/15/24 on the oxygen tubing with initials of a staff member. Observation on 3/25/25 at 1:46 PM, revealed Resident #33 had a date of 11/15/24 on the oxygen tubing with initials of a staff member. Interview on 3/24/25 at 2:03 PM, with Resident #33 revealed she doesn't need to have the oxygen on all the time, stating she can wear it when she wants or needs to. Review of the November 2024 TAR revealed the oxygen tubing was changed on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-06 for 7 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA