Hillcrest Home
915 West First Street, Sumner, IA 50674 · Non profit - Corporation · 61 certified beds · (563) 578-8591 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jul 2026
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.6% | 17.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.6% | 4.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.5% | 1.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 4.2% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 3.8% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.2% | 16.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.2% | 20.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 14.8% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.6% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.2% | 19.5% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 2.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.7% | 73.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.7% | 20.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 38.6% | 13.2% | 12.0% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.28 | 1.49 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.97 | 2.08 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 6.7–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 70.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 75.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 70.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.82 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 46.6 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.43 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.30 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.74 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Actual harm · G2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and medical provider interviews, and policy review the facility failed to implement root cause analysis interventions for previous falls resulting in a fall with fracture, and to thoroughly assess a resident for possible injury after a fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 4 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she was dependent on staff for eating, toileting, transferring, and does not walk. The MDS also informed she had diagnoses of compression fracture of the third (3rd) lumbar vertebra (spine in the lower back), anxiety, and depression. Record review of a Progress Note dated 2/12/2025 at 1:59 PM for Resident #1 documented she had an unwitnessed fall in her room at 1:53 PM and was found sitting in her doorway with her back against the door frame facing into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to follow a physician order resulting in an emergency room visit for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 10 which indicates moderate impairment of cognitive status. The MDS indicated she had hallucinations and verbal aggression directed toward others. The MDS revealed Resident #2 has diagnoses of Anxiety and Depression. On 4/24/24 at 8:49 AM observed Resident #2 sitting in her wheelchair in her room. She responded to the nurse knocking on her door and refused her medications. She wanted them left in the room but the nurse explained she needed to watch her take them. The Director of Nursing came and talked to resident and convinced her to take the medications. Resident #2 Care Plan initiated on 9/20/22 indicated behavior problem (yelling/screaming,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and policy review the facility failed to protect residents from misappropriation of property when resident medication became missing from the facility for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #40 and Resident #49). The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include:A Facility Self Report to the Department of Inspections, Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) by the Administrator on 6/21/26 at 3:50 p.m. revealed 54 doses of Hydromorphone (a highly potent, semi-synthetic opioid analgesic (narcotic) used to treat moderate to severe pain) for Resident #40 and on 6/26/26 13 doses of Hydrocodone (a potent, semi-synthetic opioid prescribed to manage severe chronic pain and suppress coughs) for Resident #49 was missing from the narcotic drawer in the medication cart. On June 20th, 2026 at approximately 7:30 p.m. Staff K, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) went to give Resident #40 his Hydromorphone out of the bubble pack per his request. Staff K noted the bubble pack…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, electronic health record (EHR) review, facility document review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to consistently respond to activated call lights within a timely manner for 1 of 17 residents reviewed (Residents #47). The facility reported a census of 51 residents.Findings Include:Resident #47's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS listed Resident #47 required partial/moderate assistance for toileting hygiene and for toilet transfers. The MDS included diagnoses of urinary tract infection, osteoporosis, hyperlipidemia, and renal insufficiency. The Care Plan Focus initiated 5/29/26 identified Resident #47 had impaired mobility. The Interventions included to ensure the call light was available to the resident and to evaluate the resident's ability to activities of daily living (ADLs) (everyday tasks).The Care Plan Focus initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and family interviews, and policy review the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve and investigate a complaint/grievance and actively work toward resolution for 1 of 1 complaint letters reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #2 document a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS also documented she needed supervision or touching assistance with transfers, toileting, and walking. The MDS informed she had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, heart failure, depression, anxiety, and a prognosis with a life expectancy of less than six (6) months to live. Record review of a letter to the facility dated 1/7/25 from Family Member #1 for Resident #2 informed the facility of the following concerns identified with the care of their loved one: a. Delay in receiving pain medication for Resident #2 when actively dying on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and family interviews, and policy review the facility failed to promptly implement a new order for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain (Resident #2). The order given was to increase the dosage of as needed (PRN) Morphine (narcotic liquid pain medication) for an actively dying resident. The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #2 document a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS also documented she needed supervision or touching assistance with transfers, toileting, and walking. The MDS informed she had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, heart failure, depression, anxiety, and a prognosis with a life expectancy of less than six (6) months to live. Record review of Resident #2 Controlled Drug Record for her morphine dated 12/21/24 documented the last dose of morphine at 0.25 mL was given on 12/22/24 at 1:30 PM. Record review of a document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, family, and provider interviews, and policy review the facility failed to obtain an order to increase an as need (PRN) morphine (liquid pain medication) order for 1 of 3 residents reviewed who was actively dying (Resident #2). The facility also failed to obtain orders prior to suctioning a resident during end of life cares for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #2 document a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS also documented she needed supervision or touching assistance with transfers, toileting, and walking. The MDS informed she had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, heart failure, depression, anxiety, and a prognosis with a life expectancy of less than six (6) months to live. Record review of Resident #2 discontinued, current, and completed morphine orders in her Electronic Health Record (EHR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards regarding following physician orders with insulin administration for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #16). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #16 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS further revealed the resident had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) and had received insulin 7 out of the past 7 days. Review of physician orders for Resident #16 revealed an order for blood glucose four times a day related to diabetes mellitus. Physician orders further revealed an order for Humalog (insulin) 30 units subcutaneously (SQ) one time a day to be given at 7:30 AM and to hold the insulin if blood sugar is less than 120 with a start date of 3/14/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure mandatory Dependent Adult Abuse training had been completed within 6 months of employment for 1 of 5 staff reviewed (Staff A). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: Personnel record review for Staff A, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) revealed a hire date of [DATE]. The personnel record revealed Staff A had previously completed Dependent Adult Abuse training [DATE] and it expired [DATE]. Staff A did not complete the mandatory training again until [DATE]. Review of facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Policy, revised 9/2022 revealed employees will receive training as required by state and federal regulations. Employees and staff members, who are mandatory reporters of dependent adult abuse,shall be required to receive two hours of training related to the identification and reporting of dependent adult abuse within six months of hire, as a part of orientation training, and every three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interviews the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 out of 5 resident reviewed. (Resident #1). The facility identified a census of 47 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1, with an assessment reference dated 3/5/24, documented diagnoses which included hypertension, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, anxiety, and repeated falls. The MDS revealed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated moderately impaired decision making abilities, has hallucinations and delusion, and required partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathing. The Plan of Care with an initiated date of 2/27/24, stated the resident had a functional performance self-care deficit related to dementia. Interventions include: Bathing/Showering: Resident is able to have a bath or shower. Bath days per Care Plan. Shower transfer EZ stand times 2 assist. Transfer/Ambulation:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow physicians orders for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident #3 and Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 for which indicated no cognitive impairments. The MDS indicated the resident had diagnoses which included hypertension, seizure disorder, and cyst of pancreas. The MDS also revealed the resident received a diuretic and an antiplatelet in the last 7 days. Resident #3 Care Plan initiated on 4/12/22 indicated the resident will be prescribed the minimum amount of medications necessary. The interventions with an initiate date of 10/5/22 directed staff to consult pharmacist to review medications, Resident prefers not to be woke up for medications between 10:00 p.m.- 6:00 a.m. and prefers to take medications in her room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and staff interview the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) discharge assessment record for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #12) reviewed. The facility identified a census of 51 residents. Findings include: An Electronic Health Record (EHR) Census Record Showed Resident #12 went to the hospital on paid leave on 7/26/22. A review of the EHR revealed MDS assessment records on 2/21/23 at 11:45 a.m. for Resident #12 had completed a 7/26/23 Discharge Return Not Anticipated Record in the EHR that had not been batched for submission to the CMS Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment and Submission and Processing (ASAP) system. The Discharge Return Not Anticipated Record had a completion date of 7/26/23 by the MDS Coordinator. During an interview on 2/22/23 at 1:27 p.m. the MDS Coordinator reported she tries to submit MDS records to the federal data base (QIES ASAP) system weekly. She reported Resident #12 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for 2 of 14 residents (Resident #36 and #159) reviewed. The facility identified a census of 51 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #36 showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 15 indicating no cognitive loss. The MDS listed a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes without complications. The MDS in Section N0300 documented a O indicating no injections received during the 7 day look back period. Section N0350 was blank for insulin use. The MDS failed to document Resident #36 received insulin injections 7 days of the look back period from 2/10/23. A Medication Review Report signed by the Provider on 12/22/22 listed the following orders: a. Humalog Junior Kwik Pen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-Injector 100 units (U)/milliliter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on electronic health record (EHR) review, Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 user's manual review, and staff interviews revealed the facility failed to submit 2 completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1 of 5 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: A review of the EHR MDS detail listing for Resident #197 revealed the following: 5/23/2025 - Quarterly - None PPS / M D S 3.0 - In Progress 2/25/2025 - admission - None PPS / M D S 3.0 - Completed 2/18/2025 - Entry / M D S 3.0 - Completed A review of all completed but not accepted MDS's for Resident #197 documented the unit is neither Medicare nor Medicaid certified and MDS data is not required by the state. The submission information for all completed but not accepted MDS's for Resident #197 documented do not submit to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). During an interview on 5/14/25 at 1:19 PM, Staff A, Business Office Manager revealed the facility is dually certified for all beds with CMS. During an interview on 5/14/25 at 2:46…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-06-20 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to have the minimum required members present at their quarterly Quality Assurance (QA) meetings as directed by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The facility reported a census of 45 residents. Findings include: QA meetings were conducted on the following dates: 4/11/23, 7/25/23, 10/10/23, 2/12/24, and 4/8/24. Review of the attendance sheets for the QA meetings revealed the required members attended the meetings on 7/25/23, 10/10/23, and 2/12/24. The attendance sheet for the QA meeting held on 4/11/23 revealed the Director of Nursing (DON) was not in attendance and the attendance sheet for the QA meeting held on 4/8/24 revealed the Infection Preventionist (IP) was not in attendance. In an interview on 6/18/24 at 1:55 PM, the Administrator stated she was not aware who was required to attend the QA meetings. She believed the required attendees were the Administrator, Medical Director and 5 other staff and was not aware the DON and IP were required to be in attendance at the meetings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-21 for 14 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| NORTHEAST SECURITY BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2023 |
| BOHLE, RON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2024 |
| KUHLMAN, KEITH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/10/2023 |
| MAIFELD, WENDI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2020 |
| MATTKE, DUSTIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2024 |
| MEYER, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2025 |
| SHEEHASE, SHERYLANN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2024 |
| SMITH, RANDALL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2023 |
| TUCKER, JANE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2010 |
| WEDEMEIER, DWIGHT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2022 |
| BERGMANN, BONNIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/01/2022 |
| MEYER, NANCY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/01/2010 |
| SCHWAKE, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/01/2020 |
| ADAMS, RUSSELL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2024 |
| DIERS, ELIZABETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/10/2026 |
| DUGAN, LARISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/21/2022 |
| GOODENBOUR, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/07/2019 |
| HIRSCH, RAVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/21/2014 |
| HOVEY, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/04/2022 |
| NIELSEN, SHERRY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/15/1976 |
| BRIGHTON CONSULTING GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2024 |
| DORNBUSCH COMPUTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/18/2024 |
| FOX REHAB OT IA LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/30/2024 |
| FOX REHAB PT IA PLLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/30/2024 |
| FOX REHAB SLP IA PLLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/30/2024 |
| PM ACQUISITION LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/31/2022 |
| RYUN, GIVENS & COMPANY, P.C. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/20/2025 |
| EDWARDS, DEBORAH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165502. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.