Tabor Manor Care Center
209 Main Street, Tabor, IA 51653 · For profit - Corporation · 46 certified beds · (712) 629-2645 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $17,996 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-11)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.0% | 17.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 4.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 6.4% | 1.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.4% | 4.2% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.6% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.1% | 3.8% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.2% | 16.6% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.2% | 20.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.9% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 4.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.4% | 25.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.5% | 19.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.37 | 1.49 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.17 | 2.08 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.3–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.71 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 41.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.550 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
64 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to protect residents from accidents and injuries for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #33, and #193) reviewed for falls. Resident #33 fell on 9/18/24 and sustained a right greater tuberosity of humerus fracture (right upper arm) when his alarm failed to go off alerting staff that he had gotten up without staff assistance. Resident #193 fell on 2/4/25 when he got up out of bed and walked across his room without staff assistance, fell, and sustained a left intertrochanteric fracture (left hip fracture). The facility reported a census of 43. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #33 dated 7/29/24 identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and depression. The document revealed the resident was substantial assistance for toileting hygiene and lower body dressing. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility investigative file review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to keep residents free from neglect. On 6/7/2026 the nurse on duty failed to administer Resident #4, #5, #6, #7, and #10 insulins as ordered by their physician. Certified Medication Aides (CMAs) reminded the nurse of those resident's orders not completed and the Electronic Health Record (EHR) changed the orders to red, alerting staff the orders had not been carried out. The facility reported a census of 41 residents.1. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 4/27/2026, documented Resident #4 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. A BIMS score of 10 indicated mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented he received insulin injections during the last 7 days. The MDS listed the following diagnoses of Resident #4: paraplegia, diabetes mellitus, stroke, seizure disorder, and depression.A Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. Staff failed to administer Resident #4, #5, #6, #7, #10 insulin as ordered by their physician. Findings included: 1. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 4/27/2026, documented Resident #4 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. A BIMS score of 10 indicated mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented he received insulin injections during the last 7 days. The MDS listed the following diagnoses of Resident #4: paraplegia, diabetes mellitus, stroke, seizure disorder, and depression.A Care Plan Focus Area with an initiation date of 12/8/2023 documented Resident #4 had a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. The Care Plan directed staff to administer his diabetes medication as ordered by the doctor. Staff are to monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. A second…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to notify the physician when Resident #6 had a change in condition. The facility also failed to notify the physician as written per orders for Resident #6. The facility reported a census of 41 residents. Findings include: On 6/19/2026 at 9:15 AM observed a closet across the front nurse's station where the copy/fax machine was located. On the inside of the door are a list of physicians with their address, fax and phone numbers. According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 5/11/2026, it documented Resident #6 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS documented he received insulin injections during the last 7 days of the review period. The MDS listed the following diagnoses of Resident #6: diabetes mellitus, cancer, coronary artery disease, stroke, seizure disorder, malnutrition, and depression.The Care Plan Focus Area with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, a list of discharged residents, staff interviews and Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual the facility failed to complete a death Minimum Data Set (MDS) after 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) expired. The facility reported a census of 41 residents. Findings include: According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of [DATE] documented Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital and had received hospice care. The following diagnoses were listed for Resident #2: palliative care, cancer, coronary artery disease, heart failure, thyroid disorder, and genetic related intellectual disability.A Progress Note dated [DATE] at 1:45 PM documented Resident #2's Power of Attorney (POA) called the nurse to his room stating he had expired. Time of death was called at 12:52 PM. On [DATE] at 9:29 AM the facility provided a document titled Admission/Discharge To/From Report with range date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 7 residents' (Resident #6) records were accurate. The facility reported a census of 41 residents. Findings include: According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 5/11/2026, Resident #6 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS documented he received insulin injections during the last 7 days. The MDS listed the following diagnoses of Resident #6: diabetes mellitus, cancer, coronary artery disease, stroke, seizure disorder, malnutrition, and depression.The Care Plan Focus Area with an initiation date of 9/3/2026 documented Resident #6 had diabetes mellitus. The Care Plan directed staff to administer his diabetes medication as ordered by the doctor. Staff are to monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness.A second Care Plan Focus Area with an initiation date of 3/12/2026 documented Resident #6 used insulin related to his diabetes diagnoses. The Care Plan directed staff to administer his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to secure prescribed medications from the possibility of unauthorized access. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings included:On 2/25/26 at 3:38 PM, a medication cart was observed unlocked at the nurses' station facing the lobby. Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) was on the opposite side of the lobby, facing a resident with her back partially positioned toward the medication cart. A vase of flowers was blocking the line-of-site between Staff A and the medication cart. The cart contained gabapentin (anticonvulsant), escitalopram (antidepressant), and multiple blood pressure medications.At 3:40 PM, a confused resident wandered toward the nurses' station as Staff B, RN approached the nurses' station from the other side and confirmed she was not assigned to the cart. She redirected the resident's attention to an activity device on the counter and stated she wasn't going to leave the medication cart unsecured.At 3:42 PM, Staff A stated the medication carts are not typically left unlocked when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature to 1 of 10 residents reviewed (Resident #24). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment.On 2/23/26 at 11:03 AM Resident #24 stated the food was served very cold most of the time. Resident #24 explained she had asked the staff to reheat the food and the staff say they would get the food reheated and the staff would not return. On 2/24/26 at approximately 12:15 PM an observation of the lunch meal room tray plating and delivery revealed:The first room tray was an alternate meal. At 12:16 PM the second room tray was plated with a regular lunch meal.Test plate plated at 12:18 PM and replaced with the second plate that was placed on the delivery cart.Test plate picked up by CNA at 12:20 PM.The plate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to transport food in accordance with professional standards by stacking food uncovered in bowls on top of each other contaminating the uncovered food. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:On 2/24/26 at 11:15 AM an observation of Staff O, Assistant Dietary Manager / [NAME] preparing pureed chocolate gooey cake revealed Staff O obtained chocolate gooey cake from the walk in refrigerator from trays stacked on each other in styrofoam bowl with clear plastic wrap cover, Staff O removed bowls of cake from trays, stacked 2 cakes on each other in one hand, stacked 3 cakes on top of each other in the other hand, cakes had no cover when brought to the table to be processed, cake processed to appropriate consistency and utilized appropriate scoop to replace puree cake in styrofoam bowl.On 2/24/26 at 11:25 AM Staff O acknowledged she should not have stacked the chocolate cakes on top of each other without a protective cover between each. Staff O stated the outside of the bowl should not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #4). The facility also maintain confidentiality of residents' records during medication administration. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #4 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The document included resident diagnoses of Alzheimer's, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and depression. The resident did not have any falls in the previous reporting period. Resident #4's Care Plan last revised 2/13/26 contained a focus of high risk for falls (10/30/25) with interventions of call light within reach and follow facility fall protocol (10/30/25). A focus area of having an actual with no injury dated 10/30/25 contained staff interventions of chair/bed alarm (12/12/25),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to provide dignity and respect by video recording a resident without notifying the resident or asking permission and by failing to remove food from the resident's face and cover the resident's right shoulder in a public area to 2 of 40 residents reviewed (Resident #36 and #24). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:1.On 2/23/26 at 12:27 PM, Staff F, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) transported Resident #36 to her room after eating lunch and positioned the resident beside her bed facing the room door. Resident #36 had mashed potatoes below her left lower lip. Resident #36's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of a stroke with reduced right side muscle strength, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and seizure disorder. It revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF-ABN), Form Center for Medicare Services (CMS)-10055 or Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), Form CMS 10123-NOMNC, for 2/3 residents reviewed (Resident #26, #11). The facility failed to provide the residents notification of the changes as soon as the change in coverage was made available. The facility reported a census of 40. Findings include:1. The Discharge Notification from therapy dated 8/31/25 for Resident #26 indicated the last treatment date for therapy would be on 9/4/25 and the discharge date would be 9/5/25. Resident #26 signed a NOMNC, Form CMA 10123-NOMNC approved 12/31/11, on 9/2/25 indicating coverage of therapy services would end on 9/5/25. Resident #26 signed the SNF-ABN form on 9/5/25 indicating the resident would begin occurring costs for therapy on 9/6/25 if electing to continue therapy services. The facility failed to provide the resident the document the charges that would occur prior to the last date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, resident interview, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide the residents with a homelike environment by serving meals on Styrofoam flatware to residents. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment.On 2/23/26 at 11:03 AM Resident #24 stated the staff in the evening serve most of the meals on Styrofoam plates and bowls. Resident #24 explained she does not like being served on Styrofoam plates. Resident #24 stated she did not know why the facility does not use actual plates. On 2/24/26 at 11:32 AM Staff L, [NAME] stated she worked 3-4 days a week serving dinner meals of the day. Staff L stated if the dish machine was broken the cook would use Styrofoam for that meal. Staff L stated the dish machine had not been out of order when she had worked but she had heard the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility document review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to report suspected abuse between two (2) residents (#2 & #37) to the State Agency after being made aware of the incident. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include:A grievance form dated 11/08/25 at 10:00 AM revealed Resident #37 informed Staff H, Restorative Aide (RA) that Resident #2 came in Resident #37's room and was bumping into everything. When he tried to stop Resident #2, Resident #2 grabbed Resident #37's shirt so Resident #37 grabbed Resident #2's shirt. Resident #2 let go of Resident #37's shirt and slapped at his hands. When Resident #37 let go of Resident #2's shirt, Resident #2 left the room.A document dated 11/08/25 titled Incident with <Resident #37 name> and <Resident #2 name> revealed the administrator interviewed Resident #37 and documented Resident #37 stated Resident #2 came in in his room and startled him and he spilt his coffee. He stated he tried to stop him by grabbing his merry walker (specialized walker with a seat to prevent falls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment for 1 of 1 resident (#29). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:On 2/23/26 at 11:48 AM, Resident #29 stated she was hard of hearing and has been trying to get hearing aids but her insurance would not cover them.The Baseline Care Plan dated 3/27/25 revealed the resident was hearing impaired.The Care Plan dated 3/31/25 included a hearing deficit focus category and directed staff to validate the resident's message by repeating aloud.The Appointment Note dated 10/21/25 at 2:33 PM revealed the facility was waiting for the resident's Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) provider to supply a phone number for the facility to contact the resident's insurance company about hearing aids.Resident #29's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07 out of 15 which indicated severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide the needed services in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 14 residents (Residents #45). The facility failed to complete/document wound treatments per physician orders and failed to administer oxycodone per physician orders. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission for Resident #45 dated 2/21/26 provided a BIMS score of 15/15 indicating normal cognition. The document revealed the resident had diagnoses of severe life threatening blood infection, diabetes and a rare flesh eating bacterial infection. The document revealed the resident had an open lesion and had the interventions of a pressure reducing device for the bed, repositioning program and application of nonsurgical dressings. Resident #45's Care Plan dated 2/24/26 contained a focus area of wound management dated 2/20/26 with interventions of measuring wound on regular intervals,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide the needed services in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 14 residents (Residents #26, #1). The facility failed to complete neurological assessments post falls, and failed to complete wound assessments to ensure healing. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission for Resident #26 dated 1/2/26 provided a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The document revealed the resident had diagnoses of stroke, anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder and schizophrenia. The document revealed the resident had a fall in the last month prior to admission, a fall in the last 2-6 months prior to admission, fracture related to a fall in the 6 months prior to admission, and no falls since the admission to the facility. The MDS Discharge Return Not Anticipated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and provider interview, the facility failed to assist the resident to obtain hearing devices through possible available resources for 1 of 1 resident (#29). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:On 2/23/26 at 11:48 AM, Resident #29 stated she was hard of hearing and has been trying to get hearing aids but her insurance would not cover them.The Care Plan dated 3/31/25 included a hearing deficit focus category and directed staff to validate the resident's message by repeating aloud.The Appointment Note dated 10/21/25 at 2:33 PM revealed the facility was waiting for the resident's Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) provider to supply a phone number for the facility to contact the resident's insurance company about hearing aids.Resident #29's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor a pressure area in a manner to reduce the risk of wound development and failed to implement offloading procedures to decrease pressure for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The document included resident diagnoses of Alzheimer's, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and depression. The document disclosed the resident had an unstageable pressure ulcer due to coverage of the wound bed by dead hard tissue. The MDS included skin treatments including a pressure reducing device for chair, bed, pressure ulcer/injury care, application of dressings to feet and the resident utilized a wheelchair (w/c)The resident's Care Plan dated 2/13/26 contained a focus area of potential/actual impairment to skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to develop programs maintaining residents strength, range of motion (ROM), mobility needs based on the comprehensive assessment and under the direct guidance of a Registered Nurse (RN) for 2 of 14 residents reviewed (Resident #26, #45). The facility reported a census of 40.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission for Resident #26 dated 1/2/26 provided a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The document revealed the resident had diagnoses of stroke, anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder and schizophrenia. The document included the resident had functional limitations of ROM in both the upper and lower extremities. The document further disclosed the resident received 4 days of passive range of motion (PROM), 3 days of active range of motion (AROM), 2 days of splint or brace assistance, 5 days of bed mobility, 5 days of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, policy review, resident interview and staff interviews the facility failed to provide respiratory services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #24) who required the use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented Resident #24 had a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea.On 2/23/26 at 11:03 AM Resident #24 stated none of the facility's staff have ever cleaned her CPAP machine. Resident #24 stated she had not had her CPAP mask or machine cleaned at all since admission to the facility.On 2/23/26 at 11:10 AM an observation of Resident #24's CPAP machine revealed speckled white sediment covered the outside of the machine. [NAME] haze colored water present in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review, clinical record review, policy review, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to provide nursing staff to assure residents safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner for 3 of 16 resident reviewed (Resident #3, #24, and #26). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #3 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, unspecified nondisplaced fracture of seventh cervical vertebra, unspecified fracture of first thoracic vertebra, functional quadriplegia and need for assistance with personal care. On 2/23/26 at 1:07 PM Resident #3 stated on the 2:00 PM - 10:00 PM shift and the overnight shift it can take much longer than 15 minutes to answer the call light. Resident #3 explained on the overnight shift it had taken over an hour to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure medication error rates were not 5 percent or greater by having a medication error rate of 8.33 percent. The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #22 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident's Care Plan 2/15/26 did not contain a focus area or intervention for independent medication administration. Observed on 2/24/26 at 7:00 AM Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN), obtained the following medications: 1 vial of Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Aerosol Solution 20-100 MCG/ACT, Milvexian 25 mg, Levothyroxine 88 MCG, acetaminophen 500 mg (2), aspirin 81, Cymbalta 30 mg, Levetiracetam 500 mg, Meloxicam 15 mg, Pantoprazole 40 mg, Senna 8.6 mg and Cholecalciferol 25 mcg and took them with a cup of water to the Resident #22's room. The staff provided the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when providing care for a resident with a catheter for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 40 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #3 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, unspecified nondisplaced fracture of seventh cervical vertebra, unspecified fracture of first thoracic vertebra, functional quadriplegia and need for assistance with personal care. The MDS documented the resident had an indwelling catheter. The Care Plan initiated 6/25/24 documented the resident has an indwelling catheter related to obstructive uropathy. The care plan interventions directed staff to position the catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, document review, staff interview, family interview and policy review the facility failed to notify the resident's representative / family / Power of Attorney (POA) for change in condition / transfer to Emergency Department (ED) when a resident fell from a full body mechanical lift for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #1) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 39 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. MDS documented Resident #1 required maximum assistance by staff for transfers.Review of Resident #1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 11/5/25 titled, Progress Notes entered by Staff C at 12:29 PM documented Resident #1 fell from a full body mechanical lift to the floor and landed in the prone position. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were called and arrived at the facility. Resident #1 was transported to the ED of her choice. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide weekly skin assessments for 2 residents reviewed (Resident #2, #3) for pressure ulcers. The facility reported a census of 39 residents. 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #2 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 4 indicating severe cognitive impairment. MDS also documented Resident #2 had 1 unstageable pressure ulcer.Review of Resident #2's EHR titled, Progress Notes documented an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel was discovered on 6/2/25. Progress Notes documented wound assessments with size and description were completed on 6/8/25, 9/15/25, 10/13/25, 11/6/25, and 11/11/25.Review of Resident #2's document printed on 11/12/25 titled, Hospice Wound Record Report documented wound assessments to the unstageable pressure ulcer located on the left heel with size and description were completed on 8/4/25, 8/12/25, 8/18/25, 8/25/25, 9/22/25, 10/2/25, 10/16/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide the needed services in accordance with professional standards by not following physician orders for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #1, #2, #4, #5) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 7/17/25 provided a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicating normal cognition. The document revealed the resident had diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression, unspecified asthma with acute exacerbation, thyrotoxicosis, unspecified without thyrotoxic crisis or storm, insomnia, Myasthenia Gravis without acute exacerbation, Myasthenia Gravis with acute exacerbation, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The document disclosed the resident's medications included antidepressant, hypnotic, anticoagulant, and anticonvulsant.The Care Plan updated 7/3/25 provided focus areas of alteration in hematological status related to long term use of anticoagulant therapy, alteration in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, staff interview and policy and procedure reviews the facility failed to complete the Iowa Criminal History, Iowa Sex Offender Registry, and Iowa Central Abuse Registry prior to employment for 1 of 1 employees reviewed (Staff E). The facility census was 40. Findings include:The personnel file for Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), reflected a hire date of 6/9/25. The file contained a Single Contact License and Background Check (SING) dated 5/20/25. The document revealed the Criminal History required further research with record found results to be faxed. The personnel file did not contain the confirmation of approval to work statement indicating the background check process was completed and the employee was able to work at the facility. On 8/19/25 at 3:00 PM the Administrator stated the facility was looking for the response for the approval to work email. On 8/20/25 at 10:35 AM the Administrator stated at this time the facility had not found the email response in printed or electronic format for approval to work. The Administrator confirmed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-10 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to post required notifications of State Survey Agencies and other support for advocacy in a form or manner accessible and understandable to residents or representatives. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: Surveyor's observations throughout the survey dates 2/3/25 - 2/6/25 revealed information posted in the common area by the nurses station on how to contact state agencies was above eye level and in small print flyers. Information on Residents Rights was not posted. A framed flyer that read current state survey, fire marshall's report, medicaid and medicare information located in lobby bookcase did not have all listed information in the lobby's bookcase. Another flyer read nondiscrimination policy and at the bottom of the flyer the contact for the facility was outdated. During a facility tour on 2/4/25 at 3:00 pm with the Administrator Assistant, it was observed that the required postings with list of names, mailing and email addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State regulatory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to make information on how to file a grievance available to the residents and make efforts to resolve complaints for 1 resident out of 8 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 2/3/25 at 10:24 am of the common areas, no information was posted on how to file a complaint or a grievance, including a name of the grievance official. In an interview with the Administrator on 2/3/25 at 3:00 pm he revealed the grievances forms and records were located in his office. During the review of the Grievances records, only 1 record was located in the binder filed on 1/2/25 and the section 3 for follow up comments was left blank. The Administrator confirmed the grievance was not followed up for a resolution. In a follow up interview with the Administrator on 2/6/25 at 2:34 pm he stated his expectations was that the residents had access to file grievances and he was responsible to complete and follow up on grievances. The Administrator provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and staff interviews the facility failed to safeguard medical record information against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: Observation on 100 hallway on 2/4/25 from 7:50 am until 8:00 am revealed an unattended medication cart located near the exit door of the hallway. The medication cart equipped with a built-in computer monitor on top of it displayed an Electronic Health Record of a current resident. It revealed personal identifiable information, including full name, room number, birthday, code status, and several medication/treatment orders. One resident walked past the unlocked computer monitor. Subsequent observations of the unlocked, unattended computer monitor with the EHR displaying residents' medical records: 1. 02/05/25 07:32 AM computer screen unlocked 2. 02/05/25 08:36 AM medication labels for refills stuck on the pill crusher 3. 02/05/25 08:37 AM facility visitor in the hallway walked by 4. 02/05/25 08:45 AM computer screen unlocked 5. 02/05/25 09:19 AM computer screen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-10 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report (July 1-September 30, 2024) review, facility staffing reports review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate staff reports for the PBJ Staffing Data Report. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: The PBJ Staffing Data Report run date 1/29/25 for quarter four 2024 triggered for excessively low weekend staffing and failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours a day. Review of weekend staffing schedules for quarter 4 months of July, August, and September 2024 revealed equal staffing during the week and the weekend. On 2/6/25 at 12:06 PM Staff E, Assistant Administrator acknowledged time sheets were not turned in for a traveling nurse in particular and was not appropriately being sent to the billing email. Staff E acknowledged this was the reason for the inaccuracy in reporting staffing data. On 2/6/25 at 12:02 PM the Administrator stated he had inaccuracies probably related to agency staff hours being reported. Stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-10 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program in place to provide quality care for residents. The facility failed to make good faith attempts to correct quality deficiencies, and maintain and implement a comprehensive QAPI program and plan. The facility identified a census of 43 residents. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) document CASPER Report 0003D dated 1/29/25 revealed the facility had repeated deficient practices in the years 2019, 2021, 2022, 2024, and 2025 as exhibited by the following: F582 Medicaid/Medicare Coverage/Liability Notice (2021, 2025) F623 Notice Requirements Before Transfer/Discharge (2021, 2022) F625 Notice of Bed Hold Policy Before/Upon Transfer (2019, 2021, 2022) F641 Accuracy of Assessments (2021, 2024, 2025) F644 Coordination of Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) and Assessments (2019, 2022, 2024, 2025) F655 Baseline Care Plan (2019, 2025) F656 Development/Implement Comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to properly establish and implement written policies and procedures for the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: The facility policy, QAPI Policy and Protocol, revealed no effective procedures to identify, collect, use and monitor data for all departments, and utilize the Facility's Assessment. The document did not identify how the facility would report, track, investigate and analyze adverse events and/or problem prone concerns. The facility policy did not describe how the facility developed corrective actions to effect change at the systems level to prevent quality of care, quality of life and safety problems. The document did not contain how the facility monitored the effectiveness of its Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) to ensure improvements were sustained. The facility did not contain the required committee members. On 2/10/25 at 11:40 AM the Administrator stated the facility was unable to provide any on-going QAPI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-10 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to maintain records of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meetings 1 of the 3 quarters reviewed and the required attendees. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: The facility provided documents titled, Q.A. Meeting, dated 7/10/24 and 12/5/24 revealed all the required members were in attendance. No further quarterly documentation was provided for the previous 3 quarters. The facility policy, QAPI Policy and Protocol undated, revealed the members did not include the Infection Preventionist and Medical Director as required. The document further revealed the team would meet monthly and as needed. The facility document, QAA Committee, revealed the members included the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator, Dietary Manager, Activities Director, Social Services, Medical Director, and Pharmacy. The document did not include Infection Preventionist. On 2/10/25 at 11:40 PM the Administrator stated the core members…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to have correct documentation of residents' choice related to advance directives for 3 of 7 residents reviewed (Resident #24, Resident #194 and Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #24 entered the facility on 1/6/25. The MDS documented resident entered with Hospice services. Review of the current Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Advance Directive as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The EHR lacked Resident Advance Directives form signed on admission to reflect the DNR wishes and signed by the resident or representative and the physician. On 2/4/24 at 3:00 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that advance directives are verified at the time of admission and confirmed the EHR and the physical chart did not have the Resident Advanced Directives form. During the follow up review of the physical record for Resident #24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility document review, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility failed to implement the abuse and neglect policy by not completing background checks prior to staff employment and failing to provide annual abuse training. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the document dated 2/4/25 titled, Employee Contact List documented Staff I, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) was hired 7/29/24. Review of the document for Staff I titled, Single Contact License and Background Check documented background check was completed 7/25/22. On 2/6/25 at 9:44 AM Staff E, Assistant Administrator acknowledged Staff I's background check was last completed 7/25/22. Staff E stated he would expect that a background check would have been completed prior to being hired 7/29/24. On 2/6/25 at 12:21 PM the Administrator stated the facility's expectation was that a background check would have been completed prior to Staff I's employment at the facility. 2. A review of the Resident #15 Electronic Health Record (EHR) titled Progress Notes documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. The MDS for Resident #16 dated 1/16/25 identified a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the following high-risk drug classes: antidepressant, diuretic, opioid, antiplatelet, hypoglycemic, and anticonvulsant. The MDS identified verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others occurring at a frequency of every 1 to 3 days. Resident #16's Care Plan revised 12/8/23 documented the resident had the potential to be verbally aggressive towards staff related to poor impulse control. A desired outcome identified the resident will demonstrate effective coping skills through the review date. However, the interventions/tasks did not include the resident's target behaviors or which coping skills to implement. It also lacked non-pharmacological interventions, ordered medications or other treatments available. Review of Resident #16's Physician Orders dated 10/11/2024 identified the resident was prescribed Fluoxetine HCI Capsule 30 mg 1 capsule by mouth daily for depressive disorder.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee file review, staff interviews, State Agency website, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that a hired nurse aide that had worked longer than 4 months had completed a training and competency evaluation program approved by the state. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: Review of the document dated 2/4/25 titled, Employee Contact List documented Staff I, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) was hired 7/29/24. Review of Staff I's employee files revealed no CNA certificate. No proof that Staff I had completed a training and competency evaluation program, a competency evaluation program approved by the State or that Staff I had been deemed or determined competent as a CNA by an approved source. A review of the State Agency (SA) website titled, Direct Care Worker Registry and Health Facility Database documented Staff I's status with CNA certification as no test, currently employed as no, and certification date/expiration date as blank. On 2/6/25 at 9:38 AM Staff J Administrative Assistance stated the facility should report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to identify target behaviors for psychotropic medication use for 5 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #33, #16, #2, #22 and #194). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #33 dated 12/26/24 identified a BIMS score of 8/15 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and depression. It identified a lack of pleasure/interest in doing things for 2-6 days of the reporting period. It did not identify indicators of psychosis. It revealed the resident exhibited behavioral symptoms towards others occurring 1-3 days, verbal behaviors towards others 4-6 days, and other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others for 1-3 days. The document revealed the resident refused cares for 4-6 days. The MDS identified Resident #33 took antipsychotic and antidepressant medications during the last 7 days of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards by not dating food items removed from boxes or disposing of expired food items. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: On 2/3/25 at 11:15 am an observation in the dry storage room revealed a sealed bag of pretzels with expiration date of September 2024, a bag of dry gravy mix with expiration date of January 2025, 12 sealed cans of chicken noodle soup with expiration date of December 2024, and a cardboard flat of 24 cans of tomato soup with expiration date of January 2024. The dry storage room also revealed 12 sleeves of sealed saltine crackers removed from boxes stored in a large plastic tote without receiving date or expiration date and 8 large bags of cereal sealed removed from boxes without receiving date or expiration date. On 2/3/25 at 11:20 am an observation of the walk-in freezer revealed 10 frozen bags of fried rice removed from the box without a receiving date or expiration date. On 2/3/25 at 11:30 Staff F,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or centralized work area by the system having a known issue that prevents the entire call light system from working. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #194 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 indicating no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and unspecified asthma with acute exacerbation. On 2/3/25 at 12:55 PM Resident #194 stated every staff member knows that her call light does not work appropriately. Resident #194 stated she used to live in a room on the west side and it did not work appropriately. Resident #194 stated she had just had her call light on for the last 30 minutes a couple minutes ago and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility document review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide training to their staff that at a minimum educates staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property and procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: A request for documentation from the Administrator and Staff E, Assistant Administrator of training for Staff I, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) in Dependent Adult Abuse / Mandatory Reporter revealed no documentation of completion or certificate of completion. A request for documentation from the Administrator and Staff E of training for Staff M, CNA in Dependent Adult Abuse/Mandatory Reporter revealed no documentation of completion or certificate of completion. On 2/6/25 at 9:44 AM Staff E, Assistant Administrator stated he just sent an email to Staff M that requested a copy of her Dependent Adult Abuse/Mandatory Reporter certificate. Staff E…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee file review and staff interview the facility failed to complete required in-service training for nurse aides to ensure continued competence no less than 12 hours per year. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: On 2/5/25 at 3:34 PM Staff D, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) stated she had worked at the facility for about a year and a half. Staff D stated the facility provided online in-services for mandatory reporters. Staff D stated she had not gotten regular in-service training related to resident rights, dementia care, infection control or behavioral health. Review of Staff D's employee file revealed no documents of yearly in-service training related to resident rights, dementia care, infection control or behavioral health. On 2/5/25 at 3:47 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated there was not currently any training being conducted as the annual training. The DON acknowledged there was no yearly in-services related to resident rights, dementia care, infection control or behavioral health that had been completed. The DON stated not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect throughout cares provided for 1 of 7 residents reviewed (Resident #15).The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #15 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 indicating severe cognitive decline. The MDS reflected Resident #15 diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), seizure disorder, and ataxia following cerebral infarction (poor muscle coordination and balance after a stroke). The MDS further documented Resident #15 required total dependence on staff for performing activities of daily living. Clinical record review of Resident #15 documented a nurse's Progress Note dated 1/10/25 at 8:49 am a concern about a staff member holding resident's hands down and forcing medications. During an interview on 2/4/25 at 3:13 pm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical document review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide residents and families with 48 hour notification of financial responsibility when Medicare Part A services were scheduled to be discontinued for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #11, and #15). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #11 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score that should not be completed by the resident and needed to be completed by the staff. Cognitive patterns identified by the staff included memory problems for short and long term memory, inability to normally recall the season, location of bedroom, staff names and faces, and residing in a nursing home. The document further revealed severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, inattention and disorganized thinking that was continuously present and did not fluctuate. The MDS revealed the resident had diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Records (EHR) review, observations, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide the residents with a comfortable homelike environment by leaving feces and urine in a commode without being emptied for at least 8 hours for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #20) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #20 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #20's EHR documented Resident #20 resided in room [ROOM NUMBER]-A by herself. On 2/3/25 at 4:02 PM entered room [ROOM NUMBER] and observed a commode full of urine and toilet paper with the toilet taped shut. Strong odor of urine noted when entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 2/5/25 at 11:05 AM entered room [ROOM NUMBER] and noted a strong smell of urine and feces. A commode in the bathroom was about 1/4 full of urine, feces and toilet paper. On 2/5/25 at 11:07 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, facility document review and the facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate, prevent further potential abuse or mistreatment and report all results of allegations of abuse to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #15 dated 1/16/25 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 indicating severe cognitive decline. The MDS reflected Resident #15 diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), seizure disorder, and ataxia following cerebral infarction (poor muscle coordination and balance after a stroke). The MDS further documented Resident #15 required total dependence on staff for performing activities of daily living. The Progress Note for Resident #15 documented on 1/10/24 at 8:49 am a concern about a staff member holding resident's hands down and forcing medications. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to represent an accurate assessment of the resident's status during the observation period of the MDS by not accurately assessing the use of insulin and antianxiety medication for 1 of 10 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #2 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE] documented use of insulin therapy by Resident #2. Review of Resident #2's Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented a physician's order for Ozempic 0.25 mg once a day every 7 days. Review of Resident #2's MAR documented no physician order for insulin. On 2/4/25 at 9:11 AM Staff P, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/MDS Coordinator stated she had worked at the facility. Staff P acknowledged the Ozempic was identified as an insulin on Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to complete a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #3), who was diagnosed with new mental disorder diagnoses since admission to the facility. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating no cognitive deficit. The MDS further revealed diagnoses of Anxiety Disorder, Depression, and Psychotic Disorder, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The document indicated the resident took antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. Review of a facility provided document titled, The Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screen Outcome, dated 6/14/22 revealed a summary of findings indicating that Resident #3 that did not show evidence of a serious mental illness or an intellectual or developmental disability (IDD)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical document review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to update care plans in a timely manner to reflect the resident's condition for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #19, #23, and #33) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #19 documented a significant change in status and hospice care program. Review of Resident #19's Care Plan lacked significant change to include hospice care or end of life care and interventions. In an interview on 2/6/25 at 3:05 pm the Director of Nursing (DON) stated her expectation was that Resident #19's Care Plan would have been updated at the time to reflect hospice services. 2. The MDS for Resident #23 dated 11/25/24 identified a BIMS score of 12/15 indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS included diagnoses of hypertension, cerebrovascular accident, paraplegia, diabetes mellitus, and personal history of other venous thrombosis and embolism. It…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to enter physician's orders into the electronic health record (EHR) and follow physician orders for a resident with an order to wear a mitt/glove for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #22) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #22 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score as rarely/never understood indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented use of a gastrostomy tube. On 2/3/25 at 1:20 PM Resident #22's mother stated she brought Resident #22 mitts but the facility told her that the mitt was seen as a restraint. Resident #22's mother stated Resident #22 never had the mitt on when she came to the facility. Resident #22's mother stated she bought Resident #22 three pairs of mitts. Review of the document dated 10/30/24 titled Physician's Order documented to place a mitt/glove on the right hand daily. Remove for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, family interview, staff interviews and facility protocol review the facility failed to provide quality of nursing care by not completing an assessment related to the use of a restraint that was ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (resident #22). The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #22 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score as rarely/never understood indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also documented use of a gastrostomy tube. On 2/3/25 at 1:20 PM Resident #22's mother stated she brought Resident #22 mitts but the facility told her that the mitt was seen as a restraint. Resident #22's mother stated Resident #22 never had the mitt on when she came to the facility. Resident #22's mother stated she bought Resident #22 three pairs of mitts. Review of the document dated 10/30/24 titled Physician's Order documented to place a mitt/glove on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, pharmacy documentation review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with professional standards, including expiration dates and with appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions. The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Findings include: 1. During a medication administration observation on 2/5/25 at 7:21 am, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) verified a medication against the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for a resident on hall 100. The MAR order directed the medication of insulin injection of 20 units. The insulin pen labeled with the resident's name and read 12 units of insulin to be injected. When asked to verify if the MAR and the insulin pen labels matched, Staff B, RN, stated they don't look at the labels, only in the MAR and she was surprised the label was still attached to the insulin pen because they often just fall off. She didn't read the label prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff and primary care provider (PCP) interviews, and policy review the facility failed to notify 1 of 3 resident's (Resident #1) PCP of the resident refusing his newly scheduled breathing treatments. The facility reported a census of 39 resident. Findings include: According to the quarterly Minimum Data (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 5/12/24 Resident #1 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS listed the following diagnoses for Resident #1: cerebral infarction, atrial fibrillation, pneumonia, stroke, dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression and gastrostomy status. The Care Plan focus area with a revision date of 11/21/23 documented Resident #1 had altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing related to wheezing. The Care Plan directed staff to administer medications/puffers as ordered, monitor for effectiveness and side effects. The following Progress Notes were documented: a) 5/16/24 at 3:00 PM resident returned from PCP office with new order for nebulizer treatments scheduled three times a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, physician and staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to have 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) PEG tube replaced when it was found to be leaking. The facility also failed to receive a physician's order to administer Resident #1's medications and feedings via Foley catheter. The facility reported a census of 39 residents. Findings include: According to the quarterly Minimum Data (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 5/12/24 Resident #1 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS documented he had a feeding tube while a resident. The MDS listed the following diagnoses for Resident #1: cerebral infarction, atrial fibrillation, pneumonia, stroke, dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression and gastrostomy status. The Care Plan focus area with a revision date of 6/16/21 documented Resident #1 has a swallowing problem related to swallowing assessment results. The Care Plan focus area with a revision date of 11/21/23 documented Resident #1 required tube feeding due to dysphagia and swallowing problems.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program that was reviewed annually. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings incude: Review of the facility provided document titled, Infection Prevention and Control Standard Precautions, revealed the last revision date was completed 1/24/23. On 4/3/24 at 11:45 AM the Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist (DON/IP), Registered Nurse (RN), stated there was an infection control policy, but was unsure if it had been reviewed and signed by the Medical Director. The DON/IP stated the facility had not had their first Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting of the year with the Medical Director present. The DON/IP stated would look for a signature page for the policy. On 4/3/24 at 3:35 PM the Administrator confirmed the Infection Control Policy should be reviewed annually, and the facility did not have a signature page acknowledging the review of the Infection Control Policy within the past year.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and guidance from the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), the facility failed to document the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment to accurately reflect the status of 2 of 16 residents reviewed (Residents #25, #1). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment of Resident #25, dated 2/23/24 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses of frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, chronic nephritic syndrome with unspecified morphologic changes, diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and unilateral primary osteoarthritis, right knee. The assessment section entitled Functional Abilities and Goals (GG) revealed Resident #25 required supervision/touching assistance for toileting hygiene, putting on/taking off footwear, partial moderate assistance for shower/bathing, lower body dressing. Sit to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer 1 resident with a negative Level I result for the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), who was later identified with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or other related condition, to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination for 1 out of 1 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for PASRR requirements. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further revealed diagnosis of anxiety disorder, depression, and bipolar disorder. Review of a facility provided document titled, PASRR Notice of Nursing Facility Approval, dated 12/10/12 revealed a summary of findings indicating that Resident #10 did not meet the criteria for intellectual disability, but did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and policy reviews the facility failed to review and revise the care plan to include a goal for 1 of 16 residents reviewed (Resident #25). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #25 scored 7 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses of frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, chronic nephritic syndrome with unspecified morphologic changes, diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and unilateral primary osteoarthritis, right knee. The assessment section entitled Functional Abilities and Goals (GG) revealed Resident #25 required supervision/touching assistance for toileting hygiene, putting on/taking off footwear, partial moderate assistance for shower/bathing, and lower body dressing. Sit to stand, chair<>bed transfers documented as set up or clean-up assistance.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were reliant on enteral feed nutrition received tube feeding per physician orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #20). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #20, dated 3/7/24, documented diagnoses to include gastrostomy status (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall, made surgically for the introduction of food) . The MDS recorded the resident received 51% or greater of total calories through tube feeding and 501 cc/day (cubic centimeters per day) or more fluid intake per tube feeding. The Care Plan of Resident #20 reflected a focus area of tube feeding due to a swallowing problem. On 4/2/24 at 3:20 pm, observation of tube feed by Staff G, Registered Nurse (RN) began. After performing hand hygiene and donning gloves, Staff G, RN, performed oral cares for Resident #20. She then opened a dresser drawer and removed a 237 milliliter(ml) box of Jevity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for 1 of 3 (Resident #5) residents observed for medication pass. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: On 4/3/24 at 7:55 am continuous observation of medication pass began with Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Staff F opened a drawer of the medication cart and removed several cards of medication for Resident #5 and began dispensing the medication into a medication cup. Staff F then replaced the medication cards into the medication cart and locked the cart and administered the medication to Resident #5. Staff F, LPN not observed to check the medication cards against the Medication Administration Record (MAR) prior to administering the medications. The State Surveyor recorded each medication given during the observation which included 200 mg of Amiodarone, an anti arrhythmic medication (a medication to treat heart rhythm problems). Following the observation of the medication pass, the list of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy/protocol review the facility failed to document for 1 of 5 residents (#7) that the resident either received the influenza immunization or did not receive the immunization due to medical contraindications. The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: Record review of Resident #7's Immunizations in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) on 4/3/24 lacked documentation if the influenza vaccine received or not given due to medical contraindications. Progress note in the EHR dated 10/31/23 by Staff D, Minimal Data Set (MDS) Coordinator, revealed Resident #7's Power of Attorney (POA) provided verbal consent for the influenza vaccine during the facility's clinic on 11/2/23. On 4/3/24 at 11:45 AM the Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist (DON/IP) stated Resident #7 did not receive the influenza vaccine on 11/2/24 as the resident had Covid and the vaccine was contraindicated at the time. The DON/IP stated the resident did receive the vaccine at a later date at the physician's office. The DON/IP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to meet a resident's need related to adequately planned transfer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Findings include: Resident #4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15 indicating mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented he had physical behaviors for 1 to 3 days during the review period. Resident #4 would significantly intrude on the privacy or activities of others and disrupt care or the living environment. Resident #4 rejected care 1 to 3 days during the review period. He required limited assistance of staff for bed mobility, transfers and toilet use. He utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility. The MDS documented the following diagnoses for the resident: Parkinson's disease, urinary tract infection, (UTI), thyroid disease, arthritis, depression, and alcohol abuse.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$17,996 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
- $4,235 — penalty dated 2023-08-21
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-06 for 4 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WORCESTER, TIMOTHY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 33% | since 12/20/2018 |
| WORCHESTER, MITCHELL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 67% | since 12/20/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $278K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165546. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.