Southeast Iowa Regional Medical - Klein Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 143.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.43 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.98 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.60 to 0.99 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility menu, and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess and intervene after a resident coughed, and then vomited during evening meal. On 12/5/25 at 5:25 PM, Resident #1 coughed and then reportedly vomited during a meal, which consisted of barbeque pork on a bun, pasta salad, buttered corn, and white cake. Another resident sitting at the table with Resident #1 reported to nursing staff Resident #1 vomited. The nursing staff checked Resident #1 and noted labored respirations, and described her as choking. Staff assisted Resident #1 outside of the dining room area while continuing to instruct her to spit out sputum. Nursing staff then assist Resident #1 to her room to use the bathroom, prepared her for bed, applied CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, a medical device used to treat sleep apnea by continuous pressurized air through a mask to keep airways open during sleep) connected to an oxygen concentrator. Nursing staff elevated the head of Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility incident and investigation reports, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a severe cognitive impairment did not exit the facility without staff knowledge. On 7/26/24, Resident #1 left a group while walking from an activity area to the memory care unit unbeknownst to the staff supervising. Resident #1 walked through the front lobby and exited out an unlocked, unalarmed door to an unsecured courtyard area. The resident walked on the sidewalk to the area between the B and C wings of the building, a location approximately 100 yards from a large pond. A staff member saw the resident from a window, and went outside to assist her back to the building. Resident #1 estimated to be outside, unsupervised for approximately ten minutes for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for elopement (Resident #1). This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to the health and safety of residents who resided at the facility. The State Agency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain a consent and provide information about the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications (medications that affected the mind, altering a person's emotions, thoughts, perceptions, or behavior) for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for medications (Residents #5, #6, #13, #17, #109). The facility reported a census of 141 residents.Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool dated 4/29/26, list of diagnoses for Resident #5 included anxiety, depression, and delirium due to a known condition. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 6 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented Resident #5 prescribed medications in the following high risk drug classes: antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressants. A 7/15/23 Care Plan entry stated the resident would not exhibit side effects resulting from psychotropic medication use. A 6/11/25 Family Practice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review facility Call Logs resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff available to answer resident calls lights in a timely manner for 6 of 7 residents (Residents #160, #7, #142, #23, #122, and #8) in the sample. The facility reported a census of 141 residents.Findings included: 1. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) Face Sheet revealed Resident #160 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of aftercare for healing traumatic fracture of the left hip. Review of Nursing Assessment and Intervention dated 6/9/26, revealed, in part, an Intervention for Resident #160 for Activity Bed Rest with exceptions; up in chair; ambulate with assistance. Review of a Nursing Note dated 6/15/26, revealed, in part, Transferring and ambulating short distances with assist of one staff, gb (gait belt) and walker. During an interview on 6/15/26 at 10:34 AM, Resident #160 reported concerns with staff answering her call light. Resident #160…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to follow infection control procedures to prevent potential cross contamination during a blood draw procedure performed on 1 of 6 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for infection control, when the specimen drawn was placed on a clean dining room table. The facility also failed to prevent potential cross contamination during the laundry process in 1 of 10 units observed, when clean personal linens were placed on potentially contaminated public seating surfaces. The facility reported a census of 141 residents. Findings include:1. During an observation on 6/16/26 at 8:41 AM, Resident #17 sat at a dining room table with 2 other residents, the 3 residents continued to have a plate of breakfast set on the table in front of them. Staff S, Registered Nurse (RN), approached Resident #17 at the dining room table and collected blood specimen from Resident #17's left forearm. Staff S completed the blood draw from Resident #17, then set the vial containing the blood specimen on top of the dining room table…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to have a resident's Iowa Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (IPOST) and provider's orders on the electronic health record match for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident #13). The facility reported a census of 141 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 scored a 5 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated cognition severely impaired. The MDS indicated medical diagnosis for vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with anxiety. The Review of the signed IPOST dated [DATE] indicated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). The Review of the electronic health record (EHR) for Physician Orders indicated Do Not Resuscitate dated [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 8:20 AM, Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN) queried where advanced directives or IPOST were located and Staff F pulled down a binder in the nurse's station and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide Resident #17 with privacy during a blood draw when procedure was performed at dining room table during a meal with other residents present for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for dignity. The facility reported a census of 141 residents.Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/26/26, revealed Resident #17 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The list of diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident ( stroke), seizure disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #17's Active Order list, dated 6/18/26, revealed a laboratory order for routine levetiracetam (brand name Keppra) level (measures the concentration of the anti-epileptic medication within the blood to ensure at a therapeutic level), started on 6/05/26, with instructions for the nurse to collect blood specimen. During an observation on 6/16/26 at 8:41 AM, Resident #17 sat at a dining room table with 2 other residents, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete reviews for gradual dose reduction for residents prescribed psychotropic medications, failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as needed anti-anxiety medication, and failed to ensure as needed psychotropic medication orders did not exceed 14 days without a physician review for 3 of 6 residents (Resident#5, Resident #13 and Resident #109) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility reported a census of 141 residents. Findings included: Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete reviews for gradual dose reduction for residents prescribed psychotropic medications, failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as needed anti-anxiety medication, and failed to ensure as needed anti-anxiety medication orders did not exceed 14 days for 3 of 6 residents (Resident#5, Resident #13…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility to ensure only licensed nursing staff applied a prescribed topical medication for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #23) reviewed for professional standards. The facility reported a census of 141 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #23 with intact cognition based on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. m, which indicated cognition intact. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed an order for clotrimazole (lotrimin) 1% cream topical, 2 times daily- administration instructions: topically to groin and breast folds for redness ordered on 6/6/26 and discontinued on 6/17/26During an interview on 6/17/26 at 11:57 AM, Resident #23 stated the Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) put a prescribed cream on her and then takes the cream back to the nurses to put back in the medication cart. During an interview on 6/18/26 at 9:55 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment free from accident and hazards by ensuring staff safely pushed wheelchairs with footrests in place during the transport of 2 of 5 residents (Resident #10 and Resident #138) reviewed for safety. The facility reported a census of 141 residents. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #138's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. The list of diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, depression, and chronic pain syndrome. The MDS indicated Resident #138 had one side lower extremity impairment, utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility and independently propelled the wheelchair. The MDS identified the resident had 2 or more falls without injury since the previous assessment.Review of Resident #138's Plan of Care initiated on 3/13/26, revealed a Plan for Falls…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident family interview, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the fall intervention of a bed alarm worked properly for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 146 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 scored a 9 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition moderately impaired. The MDS indicated resident required substantial/maximal assistance with walking 10 feet, lying to sitting on the side of the bed, and sitting to standing. The MDS revealed resident used an indwelling catheter and always continent of bowel. The MDS indicated medical diagnoses for other neurological conditions; encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system; and hemiplegia. The MDS indicated resident fell once since admission with no injury. The MDS indicated resident took opioids and used bed and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation,staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to ensure a resident remained free from elopement for one of three residents reviewed for supervision/elopement (Resident #1). The resident exited the facility without the knowledge of facility staff on 5/25/25 when the resident left the area where they resided, walked through an unoccupied area of the facility, and exited to outside of the facility. The resident walked around the facility, was seen outside by staff through a window, and was brought back into the facility by staff. The facility reported a census of 115 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1 dated 4/23/25 revealed the resident scored 3 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Per this assessment, wandering occurred 1-3 days. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan revealed the following dated 11/8/24: LTC elopement risk IPOC. Review of the Investigation Report for Resident #1 dated 5/25/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$65,094 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $57,073 — penalty dated 2025-12-17
• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-11-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 55 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in IA