No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pine Acres Rehabilitation and Care Center

1501 Office Park Road, West Des Moines, IA 50265 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 140 certified beds · (515) 223-1223 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus Facility (federal watch list)Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0567, F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0741)7 immediate-jeopardy citations$478,835 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
  • inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (103) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $478,835 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-03)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

/5
CMS overall
Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verifiedNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facilityNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
1000 73rd St · (515) 277-8900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7239 Apple Valley Dr · (515) 410-9100 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
980 73rd St
Park
1256 19th St · (515) 222-3444 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measuresNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2025-05, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2025-05 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.

Overall ratingnot rated now
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.0%17.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.3%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%1.5%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%2.4%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.1%4.2%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.7%3.8%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.9%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.2%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.5%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.2%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.2%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.4%19.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.9%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine53.8%73.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.2%20.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit24.9%13.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.921.491.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.942.081.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.9%CMS range 24.8–53.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.1–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay8.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.3%CMS range 5.7–16.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.72
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.84
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
56.9%
Total nursing turnover
81.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 83.3 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.72 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-08)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

103 citations, most serious first. The 24 most serious are shown; the remaining 79 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, observation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct comprehensive, ongoing nursing assessment and interventions for 7 of 7 residents reviewed for significant changes of condition (Resident #2, #7, #93, #71, #41, #83, #94). Resident #2 fell out of bed on [DATE] striking his face on the floor sustaining injury. The resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) where a nose fracture was ruled out and he returned to the facility. The morning of [DATE] the resident complained of pain and transferred back to the ER returning with orders for 5 days of antibiotic medication to treat a diagnosed UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) with hematuria (blood in urine). The facility failed to conduct ongoing neurological nursing assessments following Resident #2's fall with only 1 full set of neurological checks done [DATE] and the last set of full vital sign measurements recorded by nurses ending on [DATE]. Despite staff interviews indicating the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement preventive measures for a resident at risk of developing pressure sores for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure sore prevention and interventions (Resident #73, #83, #85, #94). The facility failed to utilize a pressure reducing wheelchair cushion until after Resident #73 developed an avoidable facility-acquired Stage 4 (full-thickness skin damage) pressure sore to the lower right posterior thigh (which presented with eschar [dead tissue] and treated with antibiotic), failed to maintain pressure relief to the area once developed, and failed to provide major reposition changes and incontinence care over a 7.5 hour period based on a continuous observation. The facility failed to prevent friction and shear when providing incontinence care for Resident #83 who had a facility-acquired Stage 4 Pressure sore to his left hip. The facility also failed to provide physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-06-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on grievance forms, clinical record review, family interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely and effectively manage resident pain for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pain management (Resident #94) and for 3 residents via grievance reports (room [ROOM NUMBER]-A, Resident #59, room [ROOM NUMBER]). The facility failed to assess and intervene upon the report of Resident #94 having acute pain and failed to initiate a new order for morphine pain medication in a timely manner on 3/23/26. The resident experienced severe, avoidable pain as evidenced by non-verbal pain indicators and family reports. The facility failed to successfully submit escripts for the acute pain medication to the pharmacy leading to a delay in obtaining and administering the medication. The above failure rose to a level of immediate jeopardy and the facility was notified of IJ on 5/21/26 at 3:35 PM. The failure began 3/23/26 for Resident #94. The facility removed the immediacy on 5/22/26 after the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-12-19 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident#32 received diabetic shoes as ordered by the physician on 7/10/24 to maintain good foot health and to prevent complications for a resident with a known history of bilateral foot diabetic ulcers. The failure continued throughout July and an encounter note on 7/26/24 recorded the resident required diabetic shoes due to a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer and neuropathy (nerve damage). the facility failed to follow up with a shoe vendor to ensure the shoes ordered. On 8/26/24 the resident expressed a desire for the diabetic shoes and on 8/30/24, the facility identified the resident had developed a foot ulcer. The survey team found concerns with 1 of 1 residents reviewed with a history of diabetic wounds(Resident #32). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. The IJ was determined on 12/16/24 at 3:00 PM. The IJ began on 7/26/24. The IJ immediacy was removed on 12/18/24 at 11:55 AM. The facility staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on 12/19/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, family and staff interviews, hospital notes, Emergency Medical Service (EMS) report and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were adequately supervised for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for elopement (Resident #1). The facility staff failed to know Resident #1 left the facility unattended, was severely cognitively impaired and wore a wander guard bracelet to alert staff if attempting to leave the facility. Resident #1 was last seen by staff on 10/21/24 at approximately 1:45 PM. The resident ambulated approximately 0.2 miles from the facility and suffered a fall. The EMS was called and they alerted the facility on 10/21/24 at approximately 2:15 PM that the resident had fallen and would be transported to the Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent 1 of 4 residents, who the facility identified as being at risk for elopement, from exiting the facility unsupervised. The State Agency informed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The Quarterly MDS assessment with a reference date of 6/28/23 for Resident #1 documented a score of 10 of 15 on Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) test which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses that included dementia, osteoporosis, muscle weakness, and anxiety and required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfer, ambulation, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The resident had no falls since reentry. A Nursing Care Plan dated as initiated on 8/1/22 identified a focus area: Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care deficit, with a goal of maintaining current level of function, and directed the following interventions: Transfers and ambulates with the assistance of 1 staff member and four wheeled walker (FWW), and one person assist for toileting. The Care Plan further identified resident has had falls related to impaired balance, poor safety awareness, neuromuscular/functional impairment and/or the use of medications that may increase fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, hospital records, resident, staff and advanced registered nurse practicitioner interview along with the facility protocol/policy, at the time of the investigation, the facility failed to provide ongoing assessment and intervention for a resident who demonstrated an unstageable wound to the right lateral plantar foot that was covered with eschar. The facility was not able to provide any wound documentation, and failed to follow through with wound clinic referral for which resulted in the resident being admitted to the hospital with septic shock (blood poisoning, for which can lead to organ failure, and death) related to osteomyelitis (infection in the bone for which travels in the bloodstream) and gangrene (tissues death) to the residents right foot for which resulted in the resident having a guillotine (emergency surgical amputation to prevent the spread of infection) amputation (removal of the limb) on 9/12/23 and a below the knee amputation on 9/20/23 for 1 of 6 residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2026-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility grievance documents, clinical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #81). The facility failed to perform assistance with bed mobility and transfers in a manner to prevent the occurrence of physical harm as evidenced by bruising to Resident #81's right elbow and left wrist as a result of staff holding the resident's arms too hard. The facility failed to converse with Resident #81 in a manner to prevent potential intimidation as the resident expressed a desire to shower at a different time than staff wanted. The facility also failed to perform a thorough and accurate investigation with Resident #71, who after an ER visit due to complaints of pain, was found to have rib fractures of unknown cause, putting residents at risk for further injury, abuse, or neglect for not identifying cause of injury. Additionally, the facility failed to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility document review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received Safe Smoking Assessments quarterly and/or with change in condition, adequate supervision for smoking and fall prevention safety, and interventions to prevent accidents when smoking and reduce risks for falls for 10 of 14 residents reviewed (Resident #7, #9, #46, #51, #56, #69, #71, #78, #80, #2). Resident #80 sustained injury of a thermal burn when the end of a cigarette fell into his shoe on 5/14/26. Resident #2 sustained facial injury with abrasion to the nose when a staff member moved the bed away from the wall on 4/19/26 leading to the resident landing on his face. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating severe impaired cognition. The MDS listed Resident #7 as dependent (helper does all of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, hospital record review, facility policy review, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide timely assessment and intervention for 2 of 3 (Resident #1 and Resident #8) residents in the sample. The facility failed to respond to reports of a change in condition for Resident #1, which resulted in a hospitalization for sepsis; and failed to notify the provider of the need to evaluate and review a 30-day order for psychotropic medications for a new admission (Resident #8) prior to their expiration. The facility reported a census of 85 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #1 dated 9/18/25 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS coded that the resident needed setup or clean-up assistance to eat. The MDS documented diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), heart failure, and diabetes.The Care Plan of Resident #1 identified a Focus Area of Needing Assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL). It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, hospital documentation, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2) was free from accidents. Resident #2 experienced a fall on 6/26/24 and staff were to ensure he had gripper socks on per his care plan. On 6/27/24 Resident #2 experienced another fall and was found to have regular socks on, not gripper socks. Resident #2 complained of right hip pain and the nurse noted the resident's right foot to be rotated externally. The resident was sent to the hospital for evaluation and found to have a right hip fracture. The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Findings include: According to Resident #2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 6/14/24 documented he had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score (BIMS) of 4. A BIMS score of 4 suggested severe cognitive impairment. Resident #2 exhibited wandering behavior daily. The MDS documented Resident #2 was independent for indoor mobility and required supervision or touching assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of five (5) residents actively reviewed (#1 & #4), received adequate supervision to protect against hazards in the environment. Review revealed Resident #1 required assistance of one staff with a gait belt for transfer. On 8/19/23 at approximated 6:00 a.m., Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) assisted Resident #1 to transfer without a gait belt. During transfer the resident became anxious, was waiving her arms, Staff A heard a loud sound and lowered the resident to the floor. Resident #1 sustained a right arm fracture and required hospitalization and surgery. Additionally, the facility failed to provide 1:1 supervision as assigned for Resident #4 identified with agitation, aggression, exit seeking and trespassing behaviors. On 9/27/23 Staff B, CNA left Resident #4 unsupervised to go on break. Resident #4 exited the building without authorization. The facility reported a census…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and timely intervention for a change in condition for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #77, #56, & #32). The facility failed to identify Resident #77 had developed sores and scratches on her arms. A family member discovered them and alerted staff. The resident then saw the Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) and received orders for a steroid, an antibiotic, and to notify her if no improvement by the next week. The facility failed to assess/reassess the wounds to determine if they improved. The resident developed additional signs of a problem, and was hospitalized in the intensive care unit. The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #77 scored 7 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident required supervision with transfer and ambulation. The resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review,and staff interview, the facility failed to implement and carry out interventions to prevent avoidable pressure ulcers for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Residents #26 and #230). This resulted in harm to these two residents who developed pressure ulcers. The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Stage III Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility assessment, resident council meeting minutes, facility grievance forms, resident interview, observation, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet resident needs in a timely manner in regards to answering call lights, providing incontinence care, and overall assistance with activities of daily living. The evidence identifies staffing concerns reported by 2 resident council meetings that had 18 and 14 attendees respectively and 23 different residents affected (R#1, #4, #8, #9, #12, #13, #21, #22, #25, #30, #35, #43, #44, #45, #49, 52, #59, #64, #72, #73, #74, #78, #81, #85 and 3 discharged residents identified by room numbers 504, 504-A, 205-B), indicating a widespread issue. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include:1. Review of the Facility Assessment The Facility assessment dated [DATE] documented it was last reviewed May 2026 with no changes needed. The assessment identified 48 residents needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-03 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise the facility assessment as needed to identify the changes to the leadership team, the high number of residents who required assistance with transfers and incontinence care, and how those changes directly impacted the assessment and determination of how many staff were needed to meet resident needs. The facility assessment affects all residents in the building and the facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: The Facility assessment dated [DATE] documented it was last reviewed May 2026 with no changes needed. The assessment failed to contain updates in recent leadership changes which included a new Director of Nursing (DON), MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator, and Administrator in September 2025, October 2025, and January 2026 respectively. The assessment contained names of leaders no longer employed by the facility. The Facility Assessment identified 48 residents needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to implement and practice infection control policies and practice Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) according to resident care plans for 6 of 6 residents reviewed (Residents #19, #6, #83, #52, #85, and #73). The facility failed to practice appropriate infection control measures with soiled laundry and the delivery of clean laundry. The facility failed to implement an effective infection control program due to the lack of tracking records for the entire facility and antibiotic stewardship program from January 2026 to June 2026. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include:1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #19 revealed the diagnosis of a non-pressure chronic (long term) ulcer of the left foot and contained a Multidrug-Resistant Organism (MDRO) that required surgical wound care. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was a 15 that suggested an intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on grievance documents, clinical record review, resident interview, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide timely and complete assistance to residents who needed help with toileting / incontinence care, grooming, oral care, and transferring for 6 residents reviewed for assistance with personal cares (Resident #81, #73, #83, #53, #85, #86) and 14 residents identified via grievance forms (Resident #81, #49, #43, #45, #78, #8, #83, #52, #22, #59, #25, #64, #66, formerly room [ROOM NUMBER]-B). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. The Grievance Form dated 1/15/26 signed by the Administrator recorded Resident #81 complained he wasn't getting checked and changed, providing assistance with incontinence care (care given for lack of bladder or bowel control), on the overnight shift. The Grievance Official Follow-Up section documented education went to staff on the 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM shift to ensure they checked and changed the residents every 2 hours. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a restorative program to residents with mobility concerns for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #3, #71, #83, #85). The facility reported a census of 81.Findings include:1. Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS recorded active diagnoses that included heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and depression. The MDS also documented that Resident #3 had an impairment on her lower extremity. Resident #3's Care Plan dated 5/3/26 lacked a restorative nursing program. On 5/12/26 at 12:41 PM Resident #3 stated that she didn't think a restorative program existed at the facility. Resident #3 stated that she didn't work with anyone, the facility only offered Tuesday group exercises, and she and her roommate planned to start doing exercises on television. Resident #3 noted that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff demonstrated the competencies and skills necessary to provide nursing services that met residents' needs. This was evidenced by Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) failing to perform proper hand hygiene, provide appropriate incontinence care, and demonstrate knowledge and implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and other infection prevention and control practices for 4 residents whose care was observed (Resident #83, #85, #52, #73).The facility also failed to ensure licensed nursing staff possessed the knowledge and competencies necessary to assess, monitor, and provide individualized, person-centered care based on residents' clinical conditions. This was evidenced by a nurse's inability to accurately identify and communicate Resident #83's and Resident #85's baseline status, current condition, changes in condition, and coordination of care with healthcare providers. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to respect a resident's dignity throughout all care provided and talk to resident with dignity and respect for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #25). The facility reported a census of 81 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #25 revealed diagnoses of heart attack, stroke, CHF, pulmonary disease. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) sore was 14 that suggested an intact cognition. The MDS revealed that Resident #25 was dependent upon staff for toileting and total assistance of two staff to transfer from bed-to-chair transfer.Incident Summary: On 4/13/26: Staff FFF, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) asked Staff EEE, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to assist Resident #25 to go to the restroom. Staff EEE responded, shut Resident #25's call light off, shrugged her shoulders to the resident who asked to be taken to the restroom and walked out of Resident #25's room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice of bathing time for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for choices (Resident #81). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #81 coded the resident's daily preferences and marked the resident's response that it was very important for him to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath.The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #81 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS coded the resident's functional abilities with mobility and showering self as dependent upon a helper for all effort. The MDS documented diagnoses that included debility (physical weakness) and cardiorespiratory conditions (heart and lung conditions).The Care Plan dated 5/3/26 documented a focus area revised 1/9/25 identifying the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on grievance document, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, facility investigation review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse involving injuries of unknown origin (Resident #71) and bruising that occurred as a result of staff grabbing a resident too hard (Resident #81) to the Department of Inspections, Appeals, and Licensing (DIAL) in a timely manner for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse reporting. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #71 Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating cognitively intact and Diagnoses of UTI, multiple fractures of right-side ribs, COPD, cirrhosis of liver, anxiety, and depression. Review of Resident #71's Care Plan documented a focus requiring assistance with ADL (activities of daily living) functions initiated 8/21/25 with intervention of assistance of one for transfers. Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on grievance document, clinical record review, resident interview, observation, staff interview, facility investigation review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations of allegations of abuse including bruising that occurred as a result of staff grabbing a resident too hard and allegation of intimidation/verbal abuse for 1 resident (Resident #81) and allegations of abuse involving injuries of unknown origin rib fractures for 1 resident (Resident #71), for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for comprehensive abuse investigations (Resident #81, #71). As a result, the facility could not ensure that allegations of abuse and injuries of unknown origin were fully investigated in accordance with facility policy and regulatory requirements. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #81 The Grievance Form dated 5/1/26 signed by the Administrator as resolved on 5/1/26 recorded Resident #81 reported a concern of having a bruise to his left wrist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
Show the remaining 79 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) feeding order for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #85) reviewed for nutrition. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include:Review of Resident #85's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS recorded active diagnoses of a stroke, aphasia (difficulty speaking), hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and a neurogenic bladder (loss of bladder control) with the need for a catheter. The MDS documented an impairment to one side of the upper extremities and an impairment to both sides of the lower extremities. The MDS coded Resident #85 as dependent on the assistance of two persons with the use of a mechanical lift and a wheelchair for ambulation. The MDS failed to document Resident #85's gastrostomy tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer insulin medication as ordered for Resident #79 and failed to discontinue an anticoagulant (blood thinning) medication for Resident #52, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. 1. Resident #79's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented active diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (chronic high blood sugar), anxiety (excessive persistent worry), and depression (persistent sad mood). Review of Resident #79's physician orders dated 4/16/26 revealed orders for Insulin Lispro injection 100/milliliters, with instructions to inject as directed three times daily after meals and within 30 minutes of meal completion. The ordered dosage depended on meal consumption: 3 units if 25% of the meal was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly secure medications from unauthorized access by failing to lock 2 of 2 medication carts observed. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: On 01/06/26 at 4:56 AM, a medication cart was observed unlocked in a resident hall in front of the nurse's documentation room. The cart contained an antidepressant (duloxetine) and a muscle relaxant (Baclofen). Staff I, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) was observed sitting in the documentation room while the cart drawer was opened for one (1) full minute before she approached the cart. She stated the carts should not be left unlocked but added she was about to access the cart. There were no residents in the hall.On 1/07/26 at 3:05 am, a medication cart and supply cart were discovered unlocked in a resident hall in front of the nurse's documentation room. There were no staff members or residents visible in the unit hallway. The cart contained antidepressants (duloxetine and trazadone), a blood thinner (Eliquis), and a muscle relaxant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to prepare and serve food that was palatable for one of four hallways observed. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: Observation of the lunch meal service on 1/7/26 revealed the following:a. On 1/7/26 at 11:21 AM, Staff E, dietary cook, removed a large pan containing ham and cheese sandwiches from the oven. Staff D, dietary cook, checked the temperature of the entree and reported they planned to serve the sandwiches during the lunch meal service. Staff D reported the ham and cheese sandwich temperature at 130 degrees Fahrenheit. Staff E stated the cheese was melted (on the sandwiches) and that was what the residents liked. At that time the buns appeared soft. Staff E then placed another large pan of buns with ham and cheese (inside the bun) with a piece of foil over the top of the sandwiches into the oven. b. On 1/7/26 at 11:29 AM, Staff D and Staff E wheeled the warming table with the pan of hot ham and cheese sandwiches to the dining room serving area.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly protect resident information from unauthorized access by leaving 11 residents' information accessible when staff walked away from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) laptop. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: On 1/06/26 at 5:05 AM, a laptop was observed in a resident hall with 11 residents' (301, 304, 305, 306 A, 307, & 308) Electronic Health Record (EHR) information visible.At 5:09 AM, Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN) stated laptops are not to be left open when staff are not present and also stated he didn't know it was open.On 1/08/26 at 2:26 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the laptop screen should be locked when staff walk away.A policy titled HIPAA Security Measures revised 02/2025 indicated physical safeguards will be implemented that limit physical access to its electronic information systems and the facility or facilities in which they are housed, while ensuring that properly authorized access is allowed.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident interviews, staff interviews and policy review the facility staff failed to provide care for a resident in an environment that maintained or enhanced dignity for one of twelve residents observed and required assistance for eating (Residents #30). The facility staff also failed to respond in a timely manner to call light and assist a resident off the toilet, and failed to administer pain medication for one of twenty-five residents sampled (Resident #7), and failed to knock and wait for a response before entered a resident's room (Resident #72 & #74) . The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #7 revealed the diagnoses of osteoarthritis, chronic pain and identified a fall that resulted in a fracture. Resident #7 required the assistance of 1 for toileting and transfers. Resident #7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 for an intact cognition. The Care Plan for Resident #7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to include interventions for a resident who sustained a fall with an injury (#71) and antianxiety medication and target behaviors for 1 of 5 residents (#41) in the residents' Care Plans. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include:1) On 1/05/26 at 11:26 AM, Resident #71 stated he had a previous fall from his bed the previous month and was hospitalized . He stated the facility staff directed him to place his bed in the lowest position and to call staff for assistance to prevent any future fall. His bed was not in the lowest position during the interview and there were anti-skid strips on the floor beside his bed.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #71 dated 12/11/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not established. It included diagnoses of a stroke, unsteadiness on feet, and muscle weakness. It indicated the resident was independent with oral, toileting, and personal hygiene and upper body dressing, required supervision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition (Resident #83). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #83 admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. The resident had diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression and toxic encephalopathy. The MDS revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS indicated the resident had no behaviors but had little interest in doing things and felt down/depressed 2 to 6 days during the 14 day look-back period. The MDS indicated the resident took an antipsychotic, antianxiety, and an antidepressant medication.The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an unplanned discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. The Care Plan initiated 12/17/25 revealed the resident had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to protect a resident's (#54) heels during a mechanical lift transfer and failed to provide supervision for an at-risk resident who went to the courtyard and smoked. The facility reported a census of 81 residents.Findings include:1) The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #54 dated 12/08/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of single nerve damage in both legs that causes muscle weakness and a stroke. It indicated he required setup assistance for eating and oral hygiene, moderate assistance with personal and toileting hygiene, and was dependent with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). He also required moderate to maximal assistance with all forms of mobility.The Electronic Health Record (EHR) included a form titled Braden Scale For Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 8/19/24 that revealed Resident #54 was a moderate risk for developing a pressure sore.The Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff did not consistently answer call lights within a reasonable amount of time. Family members and residents reported having to wait thirty to forty-five minutes for the call light to be answered numerous times during the evening and night time. Residents reported during evening cares and shift change the wait is longer. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include:During an interview on 1/05/26 at 4:10 pm, Resident #7, that had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS 15) that suggested an intact cognition, stated on 1/4/25 at 6:15 pm, she was assisted by Staff S, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to the toilet and then the aide left the room. Resident #7 stated she had activated the call light within 5 minutes and no staff responded to the call light to assist her back to her bed until 7 pm. During an interview on 1/5/26 at 4:15 pm, Resident #30, that had a BIMS of 15, stated on 1/4/26 at 9 pm she turned her call light on as she needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, hospital record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to administer accurate medications to 1 of 13 residents (#38) resulting in a fall and hospitalization due to low pulse and blood pressure. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #38 dated 11/29/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, high blood pressure, and diabetes mellitus. It indicated she required setup with eating and oral hygiene, required moderate assistance with upper body dressing, maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, and lower body dressing, and was dependent for personal hygiene. It also indicated she required supervision with ambulating and maximal assistance with all other mobility.On 1/05/26 at 11:54 AM, Resident #38 stated she was given the wrong medications when she was first admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) by lifting an indwelling catheter drainage bag above the resident's bladder during perineal care for 1 of 1 resident (#16). The facility reported a census of 81.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Residents #16 dated 11/12/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09 out of 15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of quadriplegia, a stroke, a multidrug-resistant organism infection, abnormal bladder function, and obstructive uropathy (urine unable to drain normally). It indicated the resident required setup assistance with eating, maximal assistance with oral hygiene and was dependent with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and all forms of mobility.The Care Plan revised 4/11/23 indicated the resident was at high risk for developing a UTI (urinary tract infection) due to suprapubic catheter (urinary catheter surgically placed directly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the pneumococcal vaccine to 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 81 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/2/25 identified an admission date of 9/25/25, the resident was over age [AGE], and had diagnoses that included cancer, sepsis and respiratory failure. The MDS indicated the resident's pneumococcal immunization not up-to-date. The MDS indicated the pneumococcal vaccine not received due to the vaccine not offered.Review of the Iowa Registry Immunization System (IRIS) document scanned into the electronic health record (EHR) revealed Resident #12 had not received a pneumococcal vaccine. The pneumococcal vaccine was recommended and listed as past due. A Pneumococcal Vaccine Consent Form for Resident #12 signed by the resident's representative on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility policy review and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to administer the COVID-19 vaccine to 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #20). The facility reported a census of 81 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #20 dated 12/22/25 identified an admission date of 4/28/25. The MDS revealed the resident had diagnoses of sepsis and non-Alzheimer's dementia.A COVID-19 Vaccine Consent Form dated 4/28/25 revealed Resident #20 gave consent to receive the COVID vaccine.The electronic health record (EHR) under the Clinical Immunizations tab revealed a COVID-19 booster last administered on 8/26/22.On 1/7/25 at 10:36 AM, review of the clinical record for Resident #20's immunization status revealed a lack of documentation on whether Resident #20 had ever received the requested COVID vaccine. In an interview on 1/7/26 at 2:15 PM, Staff F, Assistant Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to follow physician orders to remove a fentanyl patch prior to applying a new patch for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #2) reviewed. The facility reported a census of residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #3 had diagnoses of cancer, polyneuropathy due to other toxic agents, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and unspecified abdominal pain.The Care Plan initiated on 12/9/24 indicated that Resident #3 used Fentanyl related to pain and directed staff to administer the medication as ordered by the physician.The Physician's Order Summary Report dated 9/5/25 included an order for Fentanyl 25 mcg (micrograms) patch apply one patch topically to skin every 3 days and to remove old patch prior to the applying the new patch and to rotate sites.The Electronic Health Record (EHR) Progress Notes revealed that on 9/6/25 Resident #3 appeared to be confused and unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and comfortable environment, free of possible hazards. The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include:On 08/07/23 at 11:00 AM observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] noted carpet flooring throughout an entire room. The dark beige carpet was excessively stained with dark and pink color spills. The bathroom had a walk-in shower that was not used for bathing. The shower had multiple clear plastic trash bags filled with empty pop cans. The personal hygiene items were stored on the floor (disposable incontinence products). 1. Dining room observation on 8/25/25 at 10:25 am revealed the following:a. Peeling paint in several areas on the ceiling. 2 areas measuring about 1ftx1ft each had eroded from a water leak to the point the drywall was visible and the plaster had fallen off, with the peeled and dried paint hanging down from the ceiling about 5-10 inches in the air. 1 of these…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interviews, observations, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide nursing staff to assure resident safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner to 5 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #8, #12, #17 , and #5). The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include:1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #16, dated 7/20/25, included diagnoses of morbid obesity and heart failure. The MDS identified the resident was dependent on staff for all cares except eating. The MDS indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13, indicating mild cognitive impairment. Interview on 8/28/25 at 4:00 PM, Resident #16 stated the staff don’t answer the call lights timely, that it takes way over 15 minutes, and the afternoon shift is the worst and the facility is always understaffed. The resident stated the other day it was over 2 hours before they answered his call light as he had timed it on his phone. 2.The MDS assessment for Resident #17, dated 7/22/25, included diagnoses of morbid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to maintain infection control practices for 8 of 8 residents reviewed. The facility failed to ensure use of EBP when required, failed to maintain hand hygiene with dining and failed to maintain infection control practices during catheter care. The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 8/19/25 at 12:20 PM Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was sitting at a rounded table assisting 4 residents to dine. Staff B touched 1 resident’s leg with her gloved hands, then with her gloved hand picked up a 2nd resident’s bread stick and placed the bread stick in the resident’s mouth, then proceeded to touch 2 other residents’ silverware and napkins, Staff B continued to assist all 4 residents throughout the lunch meal with the same pair of gloves on and no hand hygiene performed. 2. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #9, dated 6/17/25, included diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care for one (#11) of three residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11, dated 5/22/25, included diagnoses of stroke, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). The MDS identified the resident was dependent on staff for toilet hygiene and was always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. The MDS indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Observation on 8/20/25 at 8 AM, Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Staff C, CNA entered Resident 11's room and washed hands and donned gloves. With the resident lying in bed, Staff A removed the resident's visibly wet brief, cleansed above the penis, the penis, and the scrotum, without cleansing the inner thighs. The resident was turned to his side and Staff A cleansed between the resident's buttocks and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-09 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, review of CMS-2567 reports, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in multiple repeat deficiencies identified on the facility's current recertification survey. The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: Review of facility's CMS 2567 from recertification and complaint surveys on 12/19/24, 10/31/24, 10/10/24, and 6/19/24 revealed the facility received non-harm level citations for Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan, Care Plan Timing and Revision, Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, Label/Storage Drugs & Biologicals, Sufficient/Competent and Infection Prevention & Control. The facility's plan of correction for an annual recertification survey dated 12/19/24, revealed correction date of 1/23/25 for Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plans, Care Plan Timing and Revision, Free of Accident/Hazards/Supervision/Devices, and Infection Prevention and Control, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: During a continuous observation 6/2/25 beginning at 11:50 AM, Staff E, dietary staff, served residents drinks going from table to table in the dining room during lunch service. Observed Staff E place her hand on the rim of a drinking glass and place the glass down on the table in front of a resident. Staff E placed this same hand in a trash bag attached to the serving cart more than once, then used this hand to prepare drinks for residents, placing her hand on the rim of the drinking cup for several residents without sanitizing her hands. Staff E put this same hand on the spoon portion of a spoon, not the handle, and placed the spoon into a coffee cup and handed this to a resident. Staff E placed her hand in the trash bag several times during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to document a resident's transfer to the hospital, physician and family notification, and a bed hold for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #7) The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #7 dated 4/10/25, included diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, stroke, and heart failure and a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 99 indicating the resident was not able to complete the assessment due to severe cognitive impairment. Resident #7's Clinical Census documented the resident on hospital leave 1/27/25 - 2/12/25. The Progress Notes for Resident #7's revealed the following: 1/28 - 2/11/25 - hospitalized . 2/3/25 at 5:43 PM - resident was admitted to the hospital. 2/12/25 at 1:20 PM - resident returned. Review of Resident #7's Progress Notes 1/27/25 - 2/12/25 lacked documentation of the resident's transfer to the hospital, physician and family notification of transfer to the hospital, and bed hold completed. Resident #7's hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment by not identifying a resident had a serious mental illness as considered by the state level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #34) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: The MDS for Resident #34, dated 3/22/25, included diagnoses of Psychotic Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and depression and documented the resident was not currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness. Resident #34's Notice of PASRR Level II Outcome dated 1/20/24, revealed an approved PASRR Level II outcome with the determination explanation of the resident meets PASRR criteria for serious mental illness for the diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder. Facility policy, Conducting an Accurate Resident Assessment reviewed/revised 1/2025 revealed that all residents receive an accurate assessment and correctly document the resident's medical,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to submit an updated Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation for 1 of 4 residents reviewed with mental health diagnosis and medications (Resident #31). The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating cognitively intact and diagnoses of cancer, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, renal insufficiency, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, cannabis abuse, Werrnicke's encephalopathy (serious brain disorder caused by a deficiency of thiamine. Often associated with chronic alcohol abuse) delusional disorders, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, and psychotic disorder. The MDS indicated Resident #31 is taking the following pharmacological classed medications; antipsychotics, antianxiety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 20 residents reviewed (Resident #25). The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #25 scored 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses for Resident #25 of debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, respiratory failure and need for assistance with personal care. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and the resident did not perform the activity of toilet transfer. The resident was frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel in the look back period. The resident was not on a urinary or bowel toileting program. The Care Plan, with an initiation date of 6/24/22, included the resident had a self…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to accurately reflect status of 1 of 20 (Resident #48) residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 75. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, (indicating a resident is unable to complete the interview due to not being able to understand the questions, unable to respond, or other barriers to conducting the interview). The MDS indicated, Resident #48's preferred language is Bosnia and an interpreter is needed to communicate. Resident #48's diagnoses included hypertension, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, anxiety disorder, and depression. The MDS also indicated Resident #48's mobility assistance for transfers required substantial/maximal assistance and supervision or touching assistance for walking with a walker. Review of Resident #48's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interviews, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment was free from hazards and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and ensure safety for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #75 and #5). The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #75 scored 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicting intact cognition. Diagnoses for the resident included medically complex conditions, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and respiratory failure. The Care Plan, initiated 5/16/25, included Resident #75 may smoke with supervision per smoking assessment. Resident must have supervision by nursing with removing his oxygen and monitoring signs/symptoms of low oxygen saturation. The facility Safe Smoking Assessment Form, dated 5/16/25 for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure knowledge and techniques necessary to care for residents' medication management in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, chemical restraints/psychotropic medications and medication regimen review (Resident #31). The facility reported a census of 75. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating cognitively intact and diagnoses of cancer, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, renal insufficiency, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, cannabis abuse, Werrnicke's Encephalopathy (serious brain disorder caused by a deficiency of thiamine. Often associated with chronic alcohol abuse) delusional disorders, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, and psychotic disorder. The MDS indicated Resident #31 is taking the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to safely store and label resident's medications. The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: Observation of a medication cart on 6/3/25 at 10:31 AM, revealed a medicine cup with approximately 12 pills, labelled with Resident #31's name. Staff B, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) stated He likes his meds later. Continued observation revealed unsealed/opened stock medications that were not dated with the date the bottle was opened. On 6/3/25 at 10:40 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified of undated stock medications. The DON observed the bottles in the medication cart and acknowledged the failure to indicate the opening dates. The DON stated the facility follows the Pharmacy's recommendations for labeling medications. During an interview on 6/5/25 at 3:35 PM, the DON stated residents medications should not be set up and left in the medication cart. The DON's expectations are meds to be prepared at the time the medications are administered. If residents prefer their medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide assessments, obtain orders, or follow up with physician on a resident with an identified central line for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for assessment and intervention. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #2 admitted to the facility from an acute hospital on 3/20/25. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicated intact cognition. Resident #2 diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, cirrhosis of liver, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), viral hepatitis, Diabetes Mellitus, immunodeficiency, and dependence on renal dialysis. The admission Assessment, dated 3/20/25, revealed Resident #2 required Hemodialysis for ESRD and had an arteriovenous left sided fistula. admission Assessment lacked identification of central or intravenous lines present upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews, clinical record review, staff training schedule review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the behavioral health program was effective for a resident with history of Substance Use Disorder (SUD), when direct care staff reported a lack of training for SUD, resident plan of care lacked plans to prevent substance use in the facility, or interventions for suspected or identified substance use by resident, and lacked plans for the potential of an overdose emergency, when Resident #1 displayed erratic behaviors resulting in hospitalization with positive Methamphetamines drug test for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for behavioral health. The facility reported a census of 65 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge Assessment, dated 4/24/25, for Resident#1 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS revealed that Resident #1 had verbal behaviors and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to fully review and revise the comprehensive Care Plans when a resident had a change in advance directives and smoking status for 6 of 24 residents reviewed (Residents #10, #21, #26, #34, #45, and #61). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's Iowa Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (IPOST), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 indicated in the event she had no pulse and was not breathing, Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR). Review of Resident #10's Care Plan dated [DATE], indicated Resident #10 requested Full Code status, indicating providing emergency measures as appropriate, including CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). 2. Review of Resident #34's IPOST, dated [DATE], indicated DNR code status. Review of Resident #34's Care plan dated [DATE], revealed Full Code status. 3. Review of Resident #45's IPOST, dated [DATE], indicated Full Code/CPR to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide services to protect the resident from accidents or hazards by transferring a resident in a wheelchair without foot pedals (#20), not providing supervision or apron during resident smoking breaks for 3 of 3 residents (#21, #26, and #61), and not retrieving smoking materials from 3 of 3 residents (#21, #26, and #57). The facility reported a census of 61. Findings include: 1) On 12/02/24 at 11:21 AM, Resident #57 stated he smoked and was observed with his cigarettes and lighter in his shirt pocket. He stated he keeps his cigarettes with him because the facility would not replace lost cigarettes. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #57 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of depression, hypertension (HTN), Parkinsons (brain conditions that cause slowed movements, stiffness, and tremors),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food prepared and maintained at the appropriate temperature as well as dishes and utensils cleaned in a sanitary manner related to incomplete food and dishwasher logs. The facility reported a census of 61. Findings include: 1. The Food Temperate Record logs reviewed for the months of September, October, and November. From 9/1/25 thru 10/5/24, 24 meals were incomplete or did not have any food temperatures recorded out of 105 meals. From 10/6/24 thru 11/2/24, 24 meals were incomplete or did not have any food temperatures recorded out of 84 meals. From 11/3/24 thru 11/30/24, 13 meals were incomplete or did not have any food temperatures recorded out of 84 meals. A food thermometer and alcohol wipes were observed in the food prep area for staff use. 2. The Dishmachine Quality Assurance Forms reviewed for the months of October and November. From 10/7/24 thru 11/3/24, 8 out of 84 meals did not have verification that the dischmachine chemical sanitizer reached 50 ppm or greater. From…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food is stored in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination and foodborne illness. The facility reported a census of 61. Findings include: Initial kitchen tour completed on 12/2/24 at 10:00 AM revealed the following: a. Walk-in freezer floor with excess debris (food crumbs, several small food items, packing tape from delivery boxes) b. Fryer, which was not in use, full of oil with no cover c. Plastic cereal containers with no label or dates During an interview on 12/2/24 at 11:00 AM, the Certified Dietary Manger (CDM) reported there are no required daily or weekly cleaning checklists which staff completed. A general checklist of cleaning needs is located on the whiteboard as staff enters the kitchen. Walk-in cooler and freezer floors are swept out as needed. When not in use, the fryer should have a sheet pan over the oil to protect from contamination. The CDM acknowledged the lack of labels for the cereal containers since the cereals are not stored in their original packaging. The policy Food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee file review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a criminal record check and dependent adult/child abuse registry check prior to an employee's rehire date for 1 of 5 employee files reviewed. The facility reported a census of 61. Findings include: Employee record review of Staff E, Registered Nurse, showed a rehire date of 9/9/24. Staff E's updated Single Contact License and Background Check was initiated on 9/4/24 at 3:57 PM. The Criminal History Background Check indicated further research required and to await Division of Criminal Investigation's (DCI) final response. Staff E's employee record did not show that any further follow-up completed prior to working with residents. The facility initiated another Single Contact License and Background Check on 11/11/24 at 3:57 PM. The background check process was completed on this date. However Staff E had been working with residents from 9/9/24-11/11/24. During an interview on 12/5/24 at 10:45 AM, the Provisional Administrator acknowledged that the criminal and dependent adult/child abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Care Plan addressed high risk medications such as insulin and antidepressants for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medications(Resident #29). The facility also failed to follow the Care Plan with regard to smoking materials for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #57). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. The admission Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 10/19/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #29 which included diabetes, anxiety, and depression. The MDS stated the resident received insulin (a medication used to lower blood sugar), antianxiety medications, and antidepressant medications and listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The December 2024 Medication Administration Record(MAR) listed the following: a. an 11/29/24 order for Lispro insulin(a type of fast-acting insulin) per sliding scale…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide physician orders related to code status and accurately document in clinical records so that staff know immediately what action to take or not take when an emergency arises for 2 of 24 residents reviewed (Residents #10 and #34). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's Iowa Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (IPOST), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 indicated in the event she had no pulse and was not breathing, Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR). Review of Resident #10's Care Plan dated [DATE], indicated Resident #10 requested Full code status, indicating providing emergency measures as appropriate, including CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). Review of Resident #10's Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated on the page header, Resident's code status as Full code/CPR Review of Resident #10's Physicians order dated [DATE] indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to consistently perform required pre-dialysis and post-dialysis assessments for 1 of 1 resident (#35). The facility reported a census of 61. Findings include: On 12/02/24 at 2:34 PM, Resident #35 stated staff had not routinely performed assessments before or after her hemodialysis treatments. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of anemia, hypertension, End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Diabetes Mellitus (DM), epilepsy, psychotic disorder, and Non-Alzheimer's dementia. It also revealed the resident required maximum assistance with eating and oral hygiene, and was dependent with all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). It indicated the resident received dialysis within previous 14 days. The Care Plan dated 7/10/22 included a dialysis focus and directed staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide resident care needs for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for staffing(Resident #51). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 11/5/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #51 which included hemiplegia(one-sided weakness), anxiety, and diabetes, and stated the resident was dependent on staff for toilet transfers and toileting hygiene. The MDS stated the resident was occasionally incontinent of urine and listed his Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The facility policy Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response, reviewed 11/2024, stated all staff members who saw or heard an activated call light was responsible for responding and stated if the staff member could not provide what the resident desired, the appropriate personnel should be notified. Care Plan entries, dated 12/12/22, stated the resident had the potential for impaired skin integrity related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices to prevent urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 of 1 resident (#28). The facility reported a census of 61. Findings include: On 12/02/24 at 2:07 PM, the urine in the resident's indwelling catheter was noted to be opaque and cloudy. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of obstructive uropathy (urine unable to drain normally), acute renal failure, and anemia. It indicated the resident required moderate assistance with personal hygiene and was dependent with toileting hygiene. It also revealed the resident had developed a urinary tract infection (UTI) while a resident. The Care Plan dated 7/05/24 included an indwelling catheter focus and directed staff to position the catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) Progress Notes indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic health record (EHR) review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations was provided up to date pneumococcal vaccinations (Resident #45). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: Resident #45's Face Sheet listed her age as [AGE] years old. The original admission date listed as 12/6/22. The Immunization Record for Resident #45 lacked documentation on the resident's pneumococcal vaccination status. On 7/25/23, Resident #45 signed the Pneumococcal Vaccine Consent Form and Wavier, which indicated an interest in receiving the vaccine. The EHR lacked documentation if the vaccine had been administered as requested. During an interview on 12/5/24 at 2:00 PM , the Provisional Administrator acknowledged the lack of documentation for Resident #45's pneumococcal vaccination status and if the vaccine was administered in 2023. The Infection Prevention and Control Program document reviewed/revised on 7/2024 states…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic health record (EHR) review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations were provided up to date Covid vaccinations (Resident #2 and Resident #45). The facility reported a census of 61 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #2's Face Sheet listed her age as [AGE] years old. The original admission date listed as 9/27/14. The Immunization Record for Resident #2 documented the last Covid vaccination was administered on 11/29/22. The EHR lacked documentation if an updated Covid vaccine was offered or administered in 2023. 2. Resident #45's Face Sheet listed her age as [AGE] years old. The original admission date listed as 12/6/22. The Immunization Record for Resident #45 documented the last Covid vaccination was administered on 12/21/2021. The EHR lacked documentation if an updated Covid vaccine was offered or administered in 2022 or 2023 During an interview on 12/5/24 at 2:00 PM , the the Provisional Administrator acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and laboratory interview, the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #2, #3). The facility failed to obtain labs per Physician orders. The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2 dated 1/13/24 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of coronary artery disease, heart failure (inability for the heart to pump enough blood), hypertension (high blood pressure), end stage renal disease (kidney), diabetes mellitus, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low level of oxygen in body tissue), pulmonary hypertension (type of high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs and right side of the heart), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)(chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructive air flow from the lungs). The February…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent accident and injuries for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3) for falls. The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #3 dated 5/24/24, BIMS assessment was not completed. The Staff Assessment for Mental Status indicated severely impaired decision making. The MDS identified Resident #3 was independent with bed mobility and transfers. The MDS documented Resident #3 used a walker, and had impairment on both lower extremities. The MDS documented diagnoses of anemia, coronary artery disease, hypertension, hip fracture, Alzheimer's disease and Non-Alzheimer's disease. An Incident Report dated 5/17/24 at 9:15 PM documented staff found Resident #3 laying on the floor at the end of hall 3. Resident stated, I was walking around and I fell. Resident #3 was laying on his back with his legs stretched out in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #4 dated 3/4/24 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS identified Resident #4 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and transfers.The MDS included diagnoses of heart failure (inability for the heart to pump enough blood), hypertension (high blood pressure), renal disease (kidney), diabetes mellitus, and overactive bladder. The MDS identified Resident #4 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Care Plan with target date 9/1/24 revealed Resident #4 had the potential for infection related to history of UTIs and pneumonia with initiated date of 6/7/2022. The Care Plan directed staff to monitor/document/report to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide oxygen according to physician orders for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #2, #6, and #7) for respiratory services. The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2 dated 12/4/23 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS included diagnoses of coronary artery disease, heart failure (inability for the heart to pump enough blood), hypertension (high blood pressure), end stage renal disease (kidney), diabetes mellitus, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low level of oxygen in body tissue), pulmonary hypertension (type of high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs and right side of the heart), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)(chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructive air flow from the lungs).The MDS documented Resident #2 was on oxygen therapy while a resident at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0778 — isolated
    Help the resident make transportation arrangements to and from radiology services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, hospital record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to arrange and/or provide transportation services to Physician appointments for 2 out of 3 resident reviewed (Residents #2, #3). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2 dated 1/13/24 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS identified Resident #2 was dependent on staff for bed mobility and chair/bed to chair transfers. The MDS documented Resident #2 used a wheelchair. The MDS included diagnoses of coronary artery disease, heart failure (inability for the heart to pump enough blood), hypertension (high blood pressure), end stage renal disease (kidney), diabetes mellitus, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low level of oxygen in body tissue), pulmonary hypertension (type of high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs and right side of the heart), and chronic obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to give medications as directed per the physicians orders for 2 or 4 residents reviewed. (Resident #1 and Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses for which included anemia, hip fracture, cerebrovascular accident, seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury anxiety and depression. The MDS documented the resident scored a 3 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). A score of 3 identified severely impaired cognitive abilities. The MDS assessment documented the resident required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living. The Medication Discharge report signed and dated by the physician on 1/11/24 at 10:50 a.m., instructed staff to apply a Lidocaine (pain) topical pad (4%) transdermal every day. The Electronic Order transmitted to the pharmacy dated 1/11/24, instructed staff to apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to provide two baths a week as directed for 3 out of 4 residents reviewed (#1, #2, and #3). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses for which included anemia, hip fracture, cerebrovascular accident, seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury anxiety and depression. The MDS documented the resident scored a 3 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). A score of 3 identified severely impaired cognitive abilities. The MDS assessment documented the resident required substantial to maximal assistance with showers/bathing. Review of electronic documentation of task completion (bathing) for Resident #1 revealed the facility failed to provide baths between: *December 21,2023 and December 28, 2023 *January 15, 2024 and January 22, 2024 *February 5, 2024 and February 12, 2024. 2. The MDS assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to have an effective quality assurance (QA) program in place to assist in the provision of quality care for residents and attain substantial compliance with Federal regulations and State rules. The facility identified a census of 57 residents. Findings include: Review of the Department of Inspections, Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) website under the facility's visit history revealed repeated deficient practices identified during the facility's annual survey 5/31/22 and 8/16/23, complaint investigations completed 8/16/23 and 10/31/23, and the current complaint investigations. The repeat deficiencies cited included: F658 cited 5/31/22, 8/16/23, 10/25/23, and during the current survey F684 cited 8/16/23, 10/25/23 and during the current survey. F690 cited 8/16/23 and during the current survey F725 cited 8/16/23, 10/25/23 and during the current survey F761 cited 10/25/23 and during the current survey F880 cited 8/16/23 and during the current survey A Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and medication carts kept locked when not attended by staff for 3 of 4 treatment carts observed. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: Observations revealed the following: a. On 12/11/23 at 12:25 PM, a treatment cart on the 400-500 Hall sat by the wall with drawers facing outward, and cart unlocked. The treatment cart drawers contained various medicated creams and treatments, such as wound cleanser, dakin's solution, ascetic acid solution, Nystatin, and betadine solution b. On 12/12/23 at 10:20 AM the treatment cart on the 200 hall appeared to be locked, however when pulled on the drawer the drawer opened. At the time, Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN) reported it's a manufacturer error. If the lock button is pushed in, it is expected the cart is locked, but if the drawer isn't pushed all the way in it won't lock. Staff E stated the staff assigned to the 200 hall cart is an agency staff and she wouldn't know that. Staff E didn't know what kind of training the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene prior to or after completion of treatment and dressing change, failed to cleanse a wound after a soiled dressing removed and before application of new treatment products per physician's orders, and failed to change gloves when went from a dirty to a clean area for one of two resident treatments observed (Resident #11). The facility also failed to change gloves and sanitize hands after performed incontinence care and before touched other objects such a bed control or catheter for two of three residents observed for incontinence care (Resident #11 and #12) The facility staff also failed to wear gloves when a blood sugar performed for one of two blood sugar checks observed. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 11 had diagnoses of septicemia (infection in the blood)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders to cleanse a wound after a soiled dressing removed and before application of new treatment products, failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene prior to or after completion of treatment and dressing change, and failed to change gloves when going from a dirty to a clean area for one of two resident treatments observed (Resident #11). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 11 had diagnoses of septicemia (infection in the blood) and an open wound on her left buttock. The MDS indicated the resident had a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle) and took an antibiotic during the 7-day look-back period. The Care Plan initiated 5/17/23 and revised on 10/17/23 revealed the resident had a stage 4 pressure ulcer on her sacrum related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, pharmacy interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an Albuterol inhaler was reordered from pharmacy in a timely manner for one of five residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #9). The facility also failed to follow physician's orders for obtaining daily weights, failed to notify the physician of significant weight gains, and failed to implement standards of care for resident who had diagnoses of congestive heart failure of one of five residents reviewed for assessment/intervention (Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had diagnoses of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (emphysema). The MDS revealed the resident on oxygen (O2) and took a diuretic medication during the 7-day look-back period. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide incontinence care to prevent cross contamination and infection for two of three residents observed for incontinence care (Resident #11 and #12). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 11 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and septicemia (infection in the blood). The MDS indicated the resident had a catheter, and took an antibiotic during the 7-day look-back period. The MDS revealed the resident had dependence on staff for toileting. The Care Plan initiated 5/10/23 and revised on 11/21/23 revealed the resident had self-care deficit in activities of daily living (ADL's) related to Alzheimer's disease and a recent hospitalization due to severe sepsis. The Care Plan directed staff to provide assistance of one for toileting, and use a Hoyer and two staff for transfers. During observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility staff failed to ensure resident's call light within reach for two of nine residents reviewed for call light response and accessibility (Resident #11 and Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 11 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease. The MDS revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 5, indicating cognition severely impaired. The MDS documented the resident dependent for toileting, and required substantial to maximal assistance for transfers. The MDS documented the resident had two or more falls since admission. Resident #11's Care Plan initiated 5/17/23 and revised on 11/21/23 revealed the resident had a risk for falls related to gait and balance problems, and unaware of safety needs. The Care Plan directed staff to ensure the resident's call light within reach, encourage the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to provide two baths a week as directed for 4 out of 5 residents reviewed (#6, #7, #8 and #13). The facility reported a census of 73 residents. Findings include: 1. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #6 had diagnoses for which included heart failure, hypertension, anxiety, depression and morbid obesity. The MDS documented the resident scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated the resident to be cognitively intact. The MDS assessment documented the resident with no rejection of cares, and the bathing activity itself did not occur and the entire 7-day look back period with this assessment. Review of electronic documentation of task completion for Resident #6 revealed the facility failed to provide baths in September on 9/27/2023 and for the dates October on 10/4/2023, and 10/7/0223. In an interview on 10/17/2023 at 3:50 p.m., Resident #6 stated that they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to complete bathing/showers as required for 4 of 5 residents reviewed. (#6, #7, #8 and #13) The facility census was 73 residents. Findings include: 1. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #6 had diagnoses which included heart failure, hypertension, anxiety, depression and morbid obesity. The MDS documented the resident scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). A score of 15 identified cognitively intact. The MDS assessment documented the resident with no rejection of cares, and the bathing activity itself did not occur and the entire 7-day look back period. Review of electronic documentation of task completion for Resident #6 revealed the facility failed to provide baths in September on 9/27/2023 and in October on 10/4/2023, and 10/7/0223. In an interview on 10/17/2023 at 3:50 p.m., Resident #6 stated that they did not receive their bath/showers on the above dates and would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication cart was locked on 3 occasions when the Certified Medication Aide (CMA)/Nurse responsible for the cart was not in sight. The facility reported a census of 73 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation 10/25/23 at 10:50-10:57 a.m. revealed the medication cart was unlocked and unoccupied just outside room [ROOM NUMBER] in the 100 hallway. At 10:57 a.m., Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) approached the cart and acknowledged it had not been locked as expected. Staff G, LPN stated she was responsible for the medication cart and confirmed and demonstrated that the drawers to the cart were able to be opened when the cart not locked and the drawers contained medications. 2. Observation on 10/10/23 at 12:12 p.m., - 12:20 p.m., revealed the medication cart was unlocked and unattended/unoccupied in the 200 hallway. At 12:20 p.m., Staff J, LPN was approached by this surveyor and was informed that the medication cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy and procedure review and staff interviews the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 out of 5 resident reviewed. (Resident #11). The facility identified a census of 73 residents. Findings include: 1. The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #11, with an assessment reference dated 9/25/2023, documented diagnosis for which included Cancer, Osteoporosis, Malnutrition, Depression, Anxiety, Bipolar Disorder, and restlessness and agitation. The MDS revealed the resident with short and long term memory problems, severely impaired for decision making abilities, verbal and other behavioral symptoms directed towards others, and required total assist of two staff members for all aspects of daily living. The Care Plan with a initiated date 4/23/2022, stated the resident has impaired cognitive function and/or impaired though processes as evidenced by short/long term memory deficit, impaired decisions making and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the facility physician of a urinary analysis that was not collected in a timely manner for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 73 residents. Findings include: 1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], for Resident #5 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 for which indicated no impaired cognition. The MDS documented the resident with verbal behavioral symptoms towards others, and required supervision of set-up assistance for transfers, locomotion on and off the unit, toilet use and personal hygiene and was frequently incontinent of bladder. The MDS revealed the resident had diagnoses which included muscle weakness and personal history of urinary tract infections and was on an antibiotic in the last 7 days. The Encounter Note dated 7/31/2023 at 3:54 p.m., documented New admission to the facility. History includes urinary incontinence. Past Medical History for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of a resident and/or residents are reported immediately to management staff per facility policy and to the Iowa Department of Inspection and Appeals within two hours. (Resident #11). The facility reported a census of 73 residents. Findings include: 1. The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #11, with an assessment reference dated 9/25/2023, documented diagnoses including Cancer, Osteoporosis, Malnutrition, Depression, Anxiety, Bipolar Disorder, and restlessness and agitation. The MDS revealed the resident with short and long term memory problems, severely impaired for decision making abilities, verbal and other behavioral symptoms directed towards others, and required total assist of two staff members for all aspects of daily living. The Care Plan with a initiated date 4/23/2022, stated the resident has impaired cognitive function and/or impaired though processes as evidenced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2 and #12) and failed to give medications as directed per the physicians orders during the medication pass for (Resident #15 and Resident #16). The facility failed to assure Resident #2 attended follow up cardiac appointment as ordered following a May hospitalization. Resident's appointment was canceled on 6/1/23 for lack of transportation and 6/7/23 due to lack of communication. Resident was again hospitalized and on 8/14/23 the resident was seen for a follow up cardiac appointment, however no record of her medications was sent to the clinic despite their request. Resident #12 had an appointment with the wound clinic on 9/8/2023, Resident #12 was late for the appointment and was not able to be seen. The facility reported a census of 73 residents. Findings include: 1. According to the Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review and staff interview, the facility failed to do an annual performance evaluation for 1 of 6 employee records reviewed. (Staff A). The facility identified a census of 73 residents. 1. Record Review on 10/23/2023 at 11:00 a.m., revealed Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had a hire date of 5/03/2017. *A Performance Evaluation dated 3/26/2021, revealed an annual evaluation, signed and dated by Staff A on 5/28/2021. The Personnel record lacked any documentation of Annual Performance Evaluations completed for 2022 and 2023. Interview on 10/24/2023 at 10:00 a.m., the facility Interim DON (corporate nurse), confirmed and verified that the personnel record lacked annual performance evaluations for 2022/2023 and that the expectations are that the performance evaluations to be completed yearly.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity by staff speaking to residents in a derogatory manner, confining residents to their rooms with no clinical indication, and by not following the appropriate plan of care when toileting assistance was requested for 4 of 24 residents reviewed (#37, #56, #71, #230). The facility reported a census of 79. Findings include: 1. Resident #37's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. On 7/24/23 at 4:25 pm, an observation revealed Resident #37 ambulating down the hall with her walker and asked to get some Kleenex. Staff Y, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) stated OK, I'll get you but did not turn around to face the resident. The resident repeated her request and added it was for she and her roommate. Staff Y said, ok without facing the resident. Another staff member heard the request…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a clean and homelike environment in common areas of the facility and hallways by ensuring carpeting and tiling were clean and in good repair. The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings included: 1. An observation on 7/25/23 at 10:58 a.m. revealed the carpeting at the main nursing station, throughout halls 100, 200, and 300, and in the TV area covered with multiple dark stains, ranging in size up to 2 feet in diameter. Observations on the following days revealed the stains remained: 7/26/23, 7/27/23, 7/31/23, 8/1/23. The facility policy Routine Cleaning and Disinfection, dated 4/2019, stated the facility would ensure the provision of routine cleaning in order to provide a safe and sanitary environment. The policy directed staff to clean horizontal surfaces on a regular basis and when soiling and spills occurred. On 8/10/23 at 8:38 a.m., the Administrator stated after a comment was made about the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) assistance including bathing, positioning, oral cares, incontinence cares and clean clothing for 6 of 12 residents reviewed (#32, #46, #55, #56, #63, & #275). The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool for Resident #32, dated 6/19/23, listed diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and depression. The MDS stated the resident required extensive assistance of 2 staff for personal hygiene and listed her Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score as 5 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. Continuous observation on 7/26/23 revealed the resident in bed from 7:15 a.m. through 8:39 a.m. At 8:05 a.m., staff delivered the resident's breakfast and she ate it in bed. At 8:39 a.m. Staff L, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Staff M, CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure enough staffing to ensure timely call light response times for 5 of 18 residents reviewed (Resident #24, #33, #40, #65, and #177) The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 5/26/23, listed diagnoses for Resident #24 which included coronary artery disease, kidney disease, and diabetes. The MDS stated the resident required extensive assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene, and depended completely on 2 staff for transfers. The MDS listed the resident's BIMS score as 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. In an interview on 7/24/23 at 1:47 p.m., Resident #24 stated call light wait times were horrible. She stated yesterday she had her call light on for hours and no one came in. She stated she timed it with the clock in her room. A Care Plan entry, dated 5/20/22, stated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #60's Physicians Orders included Oxycodone 5 mg every 6 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain 11/21/22 to 2/14/22, then Oxycodone 5 mg every 8 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain 2/14/23 to 2/16/23, then Oxycodone every 6 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain with a start date of 2/16/23. A Misappropriation of Medication Investigation dated 3/8/23 documented Staff U Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) talked to the Director of Nursing (DON) about a card of Oxycodone for Resident #60 (in the hospital at the time). Staff V Certified Medication Aide (CMA)/Scheduler told Staff U it was in the DON's office. Staff V said she would come in, but did not. Staff U and the DON went into the scheduling office to see if they could locate the blister pack. They found a blister pack in a file cabinet, with no narcotic sheet present. The blister pack was empty. The DON was uncertain if it was the bubble pack in question. Staff U placed a couple more calls to see if Staff V was coming in to produce a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interview and observations, the facility failed to provide ready access to resident's personal funds managed by the facility for 3 of 12 residents sampled. (#4, #12 & #55) Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #12 dated 6/28/23 identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The Care Plan of Resident #12, last review date of 4/7/23 failed to reveal any documentation regarding a Personal Funds Account with the facility. On 7/24/23 at 11:23 am Resident #12 stated she is supposed to receive $50 a month but the facility never wants to give it to her. She stated when she knows she has a shopping trip coming up she will make a request for the money but she it is always delayed. She described this as very aggravating. She stated there is only 1 staff member who can access the money for any of the residents. On 7/26/23 at 9:50 am, signage was observed on the door to facility business…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete accounting records by failing to credit personal fund account deposits in an acceptable timeframe for 1 of 3 residents (#2). The facility identified a census of 79 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, which indicated severely impaired cognition. It revealed medical diagnoses of anxiety, depression, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (Lou Gehrigsdisease - a neurologic disease that causes the nerves responsible for muscle movement to degenerate and die). On 8/02/23 at 12:30 PM, Resident #2's family member stated that the facility failed to properly credit the resident's personal trust fund for deposits on 5/25/23 and 7/25/23 and failed to credit billing statements for 7/7/23. A billing statement dated 6/28/23 included an upcoming resident liability charge due on 7/01/23. An endorsed check revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify the physician and family of a resident's change in condition for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #77). The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include: 1) According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #77 scored 7 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident required supervision with transfer and ambulation. The resident's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease. The Care Plan revised 7/12/22 identified the resident had (potential for) impaired skin integrity and was at risk for edema, skin/tissue color changes, sensitivity towards heat/cold, swelling and pain. The interventions included: a. Avoiding scratching and keeping hands and body parts from excessive moisture, b. Keeping fingernails short, c. Encouraging good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin, d. Keeping skin clean and dry, e. Using lotion on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assure a resident's contact person was notified when a resident chose to leave against medical advice (AMA) for 1 resident reviewed (Resident #224). The facility also failed to implement a discharge planning process for Resident #63. The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include: 1. The Progress Notes dated 7/12/23 at 6:31 p.m. documented the Resident #224 arrived via ambulance around 2:30 p.m. Paperwork received. Faxed discharge papers from the hospital to the primary care provider (PCP) and pharmacy. The resident used a wheelchair, able to propel self, and had bilateral above the knee amputations. Resident #224's clinical record included Hospital Discharge records. A Hospitalist Progress Note dated 7/10/23 contained documentation a psychiatric evaluation noted the resident not competent to make his own decisions, and listed a family member as his primary contact. The Baseline Care Plan completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility records, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to analyze the cause of falls and provide interventions to prevent further falls for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #74) reviewed for accidents and falls. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #74 documented an admission date to the facility of 2/10/23. The MDS identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS identified the resident experienced falls prior to admission to the facility and experienced 2 or more falls without injury since admission to the facility. The MDS documented a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. The Care Plan, with initiated date 3/2/23 documented a Focus Area of Falls as follows; the resident has had an actual fall with (no injury, minor injury, serious injury) poor balance, poor communication/comprehension, and unsteady walking. The Care Plan documented three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to assure adequate nutrition and hydration for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #75). The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #75 scored 0 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident depended on staff for transfer and required extensive assist with eating. The resident's diagnoses included aphasia (language disorder), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and cerbrovascular accident (stroke). The Care Plan identified the resident at risk for altered nutritional status due to dysphagia, compromised dentition, fair-poor intakes of solids (pureed food) with preferences for liquids. The resident was totally dependent on staff or family for assistance with feeding solids and liquids. The interventions included providing and serving oral nutritional supplements as ordered per the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care by failing to provide portable oxygen tanks for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care (#55). The facility reported a census of 79. Findings include: On 7/24/23 at 11:27 AM, Resident #55 stated staff told him on 6/20/23 the facility did not have portable oxygen tanks. He also stated he was confined to his room because his oxygen concentrator mobility limitations. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) listed diagnoses of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (lung disease making it difficult to breathe), morbid obesity, muscle weakness, and lower back pain. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment included diagnoses of CHF, COPD, and morbid obesity and indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15, which indicated intact cognition. It also revealed the resident was dependent on supplemental oxygen. The Care Plan dated 3/24/23 included the resident's dependence on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of a medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility's medication error rate was 10.71% which affected 2 out of 5 residents observed during the medication pass(Resident #274 and #177). The facility reported a census of 79 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #274's Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 7/15/23, listed diagnoses for Resident #274 which included depression, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and respiratory failure. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) as 8 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. A 7/15/23 Care Plan entry stated the resident had chronic respiratory failure. A 7/24/23 Care Plan entry stated the resident received an antidepressant. On 7/26/23 at 7:50 a.m. Staff A Certified Medication Aide(CMA) prepared Resident #274's morning medications which included Resident #275's sertraline(an antidepressant) 25 milligrams(mg) half tablet(12.5 mg). Staff A also removed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-06-03 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to post the daily staffing report as required in a public location for residents and visitors to see on a daily basis. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include:Observation on 5/23/26 at 7:07 PM revealed the daily staffing report posted by the east entrance before the dining/activity room. The print was very small and hard to read from greater than 12 inches away and standing at an approximate height of 5 feet. The daily posting papers were kept in a page protector sleeve and several forms were in it. Further observation revealed the top page dated 5/20/26 and all other forms behind that page dated prior to 5/14/26, and no posting since 5/20/26 found in the facility anywhere else. On 5/23/26 at 7:18 PM, when asked about the daily staff posting and where it could be found in the facility, Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), responded that the current staffing schedule was in the staff breakroom. On 5/23/26 at 7:39 PM, Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) responded he knew nothing about the daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$478,835 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $286,660 — penalty dated 2026-06-03
  • $121,006 — penalty dated 2024-12-19
  • $71,169 — penalty dated 2024-10-10
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-01 for 16 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GUTMAN, LEIBELIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2021
IKE, AKIKOIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2021
KAPLAN, YISROELIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2021
KOHN, BRIANIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2021
ROSENBLATT, MOSHEIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2021
ASCHENDORF, JONATHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2023
BISHOP, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
BLACKBURN, NATASHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/27/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$824K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 8%Other / private 29%

This home reported $824K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$353per resident / day
operating cost
$10,739per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$347per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165350. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next