Wheatland Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 41.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure staff used a gait belt during a transfer of a resident who required moderate assistance which resulted in an arm fracture for 1 of 3 (Resident #48) residents reviewed for falls. The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #48, dated 10/29/25, revealed a list of diagnoses which included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes and history of a fracture. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 indicated a mild cognitive impairment. The MDS assessed the resident required moderate assistance (a helper lifted, held, or supported trunk or limbs for less than half of the effort) with transfer, toileting, and ambulation. Review of Resident #48's Care Plan, revised 7/10/25 revealed a Focus area to address The resident has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Limited Mobility d/t (do to) multiple fractures. Interventions included, in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall which resulted in a fracture requiring a surgical repair for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for falls.(Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 9/25/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #5 which included orthostatic hypotension (a drop in blood pressure that occurs when standing up from a sitting or lying position), right hip fracture, and coronary artery disease. The MDS indicated Resident #5 required partial to moderate assist of staff to sit to stand, chair/bed-to-chair transfer, toilet transfer, and walk 10 feet to 50 feet. The Brief for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicated intact cognition. The Care Plan, revised on 1/15/24 included a Focus Area to address The resident [Resident #5] has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) R (right) Hip Fracture, Limited Mobility, Muscles Impairment. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to check the temperature of cabbage served and further failed to perform hand hygiene when picking up an item from floor during meal service for 1 of 1 meal services observed. The facility reported a census of 41 residents. Findings Include: On 1/30/24 at 12:00 PM, Dietary Supervisor checked the temperature on the following items being served: grilled turkey sandwich, sweet potato fries, coleslaw, and Jell-O, just before meal service. Noted an additional item, steamed cabbage, kept on the stove top that had been served for residents whom required mechanically altered and soft food. The Dietary Supervisor had not obtained a temperature reading of the cabbage prior to service to ensure a safe to eat cooking temperature. On 1/31/24 at 12:15 PM, Staff G, Dietary Aide, delivered plates to the residents from the kitchen steamtable. During meal service, a Resident's Diet Card had fallen on the floor, Staff G picked the card up from the floor and placed it on a clean counter, Staff G then grabbed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide residents with privacy and dignity during transport to the shower room when residents were pulled backwards in a shower chair with skin exposed for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Residents #9, #21, and #95). The facility reported a census of 41 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/29/23 for Resident #9, revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicative of intact cognition. Resident #9 identified dependent on staff for transfers and bathing. Diagnoses included right femur fracture, cancer, and arthritis. The Care Plan, revised 1/15/24, revealed Resident #9 with an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care deficit and required assistance of one staff for bathing and instructed staff to provide sponge bath with a full bath or shower cannot be tolerated. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Task charting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual review, the facility failed to code 2 out of 5 Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments correctly for residents reviewed (Resident #5 and #20). The facility reported a census of 41 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #20 dated 11/15/23, showed she took an antidepressant medication in the seven day look back period. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated November 2023, failed to include documentation Resident #20 took an antidepressant during the reference period. On 1/31/24 at 1:56 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed Resident # 20 failed to utilize an antidepressant at the time of the MDS dated [DATE]. 2. The MDS for Resident #5 dated 1/3/2024, showed she took an antidepressant medication in the seven day look back period. The MAR dated December 2023, failed to include documentation that Resident #5 took an antidepressant during the month of December. The MAR dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow Physician's Orders when a resident's Fentanyl pain patch had been omitted for greater than one day for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for psych/opioid medication review (Resident #19). The facility reported a census of 41 residents. Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] for Resident #19, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Resident required scheduled and as needed pain medications, had pain frequently, and occasional pain interference with therapy activities. Diagnoses included: displacement fracture of the 7th vertebra (neck fracture), arthritis, disorder of bone density, and neuropathy. The Care Plan, initiated 12/28/23, revealed a Focus Area for acute pain related to fracture and chronic pain related to bone density disorder with a goal that resident will verbalize adequate relief of pain, and an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide a call light within reach of a resident in his room for one out of twelve resident reviewed (Resident 10) and one of 3 unlocked bathrooms failed to have a call light in one of the unlocked facility restrooms. The facility reported a census of 41 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum data Set (MDS) Assessment for Resident #10 dated 11/1/23, included diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia and hypertension. The MDS identified Resident #10' Brief Interview for Mental Statues as 00, severe cognitive impairments. The MDS reflected Resident #10 required supervision for toileting and substantial assist for transfers. The Care Plan for Resident #10 dated 3/2/23, directed to encourage the resident to use bell to call for assistance. The following observations revealed the following situations for Resident #10 and access to his call light: a. On 1/29/24 at 11:15 AM, Resident #10 sat in the wheel chair (W/C) in the middle of his room and failed to have a call light in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$19,338 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $19,338 — penalty dated 2026-01-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $90K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA