Bingham Memorial Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of nursing practice were followed for 3 of 4 residents (#5, #11, and #28) reviewed for quality of care. Residents were at risk for adverse outcomes when they did not have Physician orders for medications that residents received or Physician orders did not document all the required elements to prevent adverse drug reactions. These failed practices had the potential to adversely affect residents whose care and services were not followed according to accepted standards of practice. Findings include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on the 11/13/25, with multiple diagnoses including aftercare following surgery on the digestive system and dislocation of the left hip. On 11/17/25 at 8:12 AM, observed LPN #1 administer Optase eye drops, 2 drops in both eyes, to Resident #5. On 11/17/25 at 10:47 AM, record review of Resident #5's medical record did not document an order for Optase…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications available for residents were stored appropriately, this was true for 1 of 2 nurses observed for medication pass and 1 of 1 medication carts audited for labeling and storage of medication. This failure created the potential for residents to have missed doses of medication and created the potential for harm to a resident if they were to obtain medications which were left unattended and unsecured by staff. Findings include:1.On 11/17/25 at 8 AM, the 300-hall medication cart was observed outside the dining room, by the front door of the facility, unlocked. On top of the medication cart was the medication cart keys. No staff were present.On 11/17/25 at 8:03 AM LPN #1 stated the medication cart should have been locked and she should not have left the key to the medication cart on the cart.2. On 11/17/25 at 8:17 AM, observed the 300-hall medication cart outside room # 316, unlocked.On 11/17/25 at 8:20 AM, LPN #1 stated she should have locked the medication cart when she went into the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, document reviews, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment. These failures had the potential to impact all residents in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include:The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Bloodborne Pathogens regulations 1910.1030, updated 10/19/21, states, Eating, drinking, smoking, applying cosmetics or lip balm, and handling contact lenses are prohibited in work areas where there is a reasonable likelihood of occupational exposure and Food and drink shall not be kept in refrigerators, freezers, shelves, cabinets or on countertops or benchtops where blood or other potentially infectious materials are present.The CDC Long-term Care Facilities Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in Nursing Homes, dated 6/28/24, documented indwelling medical devices…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's privacy was protected for 1 of 1 medication carts reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of embarrassment and loss of control over their personal information. Findings include:In the facility's admission packet the Health Information Privacy Act Amendment and Actives form, undated, documented all health care professionals, employees, staff, personnel, and volunteers who are authorized to enter information into medical charts and who share information with each other for treatment, payment, and office operations must abide by HIPAA Rules. 1. On 11/17/25 at 8:00 AM, observed hall-300 medication cart outside the dining room with the computer open to resident information. No staff were present.On 11/17/25 at 8:03 AM, LPN #1 stated she should have locked her computer when she went into the dining room.2. On 11/17/25 at 8:25 AM, observed on hall 300, the 300-hall medication cart with the computer on top of it with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Appendix PP of the State Operations Manual, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to refer residents for further evaluation when residents were diagnosed with a major mental illness, intellectual disability, or a related condition. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for PASARR level II evaluations. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if an appropriate state-designated authority did not evaluate a resident's mental health needs. Findings include: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including schizophrenia, bipolar, anxiety, and PTSD, each classified as a serious mental illness.On 10/10/25, Resident #4's PASRR level I screening documented she did not have a serious mental illness.On 10/11/25, Resident #4's history and physical documented she had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar, anxiety, and PTSD.On 10/16/25, Resident #4's MDS assessment documented she had a diagnosis of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to include necessary healthcare information for 2 of 4 residents (#1 and #2) on resident's baseline care plans. This failure created the potential for resident specific needs to go unrecognized due to lack of information for caregivers. Findings include:The facility's Baseline Care Plan policy dated 10/2/25, documented [NAME] Memorial Skilled Nursing and Rehab will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care.1. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including stage 3 pressure ulcer to the coccyx, MRSA (a type of bacteria that is resistant to several antibiotics), and neurogenic bladder (a condition caused by damage to the nerves controlling the bladder).Resident #1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were comprehensive and individualized for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) whose comprehensive care plans were reviewed. This placed residents at risk for adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided due to care plans being incomplete and not person-centered. Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including stage 3 pressure ulcer to the coccyx, MRSA (a type of bacteria that is resistant to several antibiotics), and neurogenic bladder (a condition caused by damage to the nerves controlling the bladder).Resident #1's admission MDS dated [DATE], documented she had a suprapubic catheter.Resident #1's comprehensive care plan interventions documented CATHETER: I have (SPECIFY Size) (SPECIFY Type of Catheter). Position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door. Resident #1's comprehensive care plan was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 1 of 1 medication carts reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy revision date 9/25/25, documented if medication is a controlled substance and packed in a medication card or bottle, sign the narcotic book. Count every incoming and outgoing shift to evaluate any discrepancy.On 11/19/25 at 10:17 AM, the following was observed during the hall 300-medication cart audit:- the narcotic accountability record, dated 11/1/25 to 11/19/25, had 16 licensed nurse signatures not document. - the narcotic count sheet for Resident #1's Butrans transdermal 7.5mg patch documented 10 patches available. Observed 2 patches in the narcotic box. After reviewing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure all call light buttons or pads were easily accessible to residents. This was true for 2 of 19 residents (#14 and #15) whose rooms were observed for call light device locations. This failure had the potential for harm if residents were not able to summon staff for assistance. Findings include:The facility's Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy revision date 3/1/2025, documented staff will ensure the call light is within reach of each resident and secured, as needed.1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including malnutrition and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breath).Resident #14's annual MDS dated [DATE], documented was cognitively intact.Resident #14's care plan documented he was able to consistently use his call light.On 11/17/25 at 8:53 AM, Resident #14's call light device was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, policy review, and review of the Idaho Food Code, the facility failed to appropriately store, distribute, and label foods. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 17 of 17 residents who received meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination and use of spoiled foods, and adverse health outcomes including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: The Idaho Food Code, revised February 2021, stated, 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking . refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5ºC (41ºF) or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1. Review of the facility's Food Storage policy, dated 6/27/23, documented perishable food in open containers, or outside of their original…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in ID