Idaho State Veterans Home - Boise

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 75.1 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.22 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.56 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.47 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2018-11-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility did not ensure residents were free from chemical restraints. There was no documented evidence a systematic process of evaluation and care planning was utilized for staff to first implement resident-specific focused non-pharmacological interventions should residents demonstrate aggressive behaviors. This resulted in harm to 1 of 6 residents (Resident #261) reviewed for psychotropic drug use. Resident #261 was harmed when he experienced increased somnolence, sedation, and a decline in ADL's as a result of multiple psychotropic medications. Findings include: A facility policy, Mood and Behavior Medication Review Committee, undated, documented the committee identified and evaluated residents use of medication for behaviors or mood and the committee would determine the appropriate interventions and ensure consents, orders, and care plans were completed. The facility's ADL Behavior Monitor flowsheets documented the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2018-11-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to a) attempt GDR of psychotropic medications, b) monitor behavioral symptoms, c) obtain informed consents for the medications, and d) identify resident specific behaviors on the care plan. This was true for 4 of 6 residents (#2, #30, #87, and #261) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This resulted in harm to Resident #261 when he experienced increased somnolence, sedation, and a decline in ADL's as a result of multiple psychotropic medications. This deficient practice also had the potential for harm of other residents if they receive unnecessary psychotropic medications which were not adequately monitored. Findings include: A facility policy Mood and Behavior Medication Review Committee, undated, documented the committee identified and evaluated residents use of medication for behaviors or mood and the committee would determine the appropriate interventions and ensure consents, orders, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-16 · tag F0641 — widespread
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments included correct assessment information. This was true for 7 of 11 residents (#11, #26, #28, #29, #38, #46, and #52) whose records were reviewed for accuracy. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if residents were not assessed and/or monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include: The RAI, revised 10/1/2024, documented section A1500, PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review), was to be coded yes when a PASRR level II screening determines a resident has a serious mental illness and/or mental retardation, or related condition. 1. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses of dementia with agitation, PTSD, and Major Depressive Disorder. Resident #26's admission MDS assessment, dated 12/11/23 and Significant Change MDS dated [DATE], documented under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — widespread
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, medication error reports, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from significant medication errors. This was true for 15 of 39 residents (#3, #12, #15, #16, #27, #33, #37, #39, #44, #46, #52, #57, #64, #73, and #281) reviewed for medication errors. This deficient practice created the potential for harm when residents received the wrong dosage of medications or did not receive their prescribed medications. Findings include: The facilities Procedure for Medication Errors/Omissions revised December 2015, documented a medication and treatment error report will be completed upon identification of any of the following: -wrong resident -wrong medication -wrong dose -wrong frequency -wrong route -omitted medication(s) 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia, chronic pain syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis. Resident #3's physician's order was for Oxycodone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-16 · tag F0839 — widespread
  Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of staff schedules, policy review, license review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing staff possessed a license within the state where they provided care. This was true for 3 of 28 CNAs (CNA #4, CNA #5, CNA #6) and 2 of 22 Licensed nurses (LPN #1, and LPN #2) whose certifications and licenses reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 77 residents in the facility. This failure created the potential for harm if residents received inappropriate care due to a staff lacking the required credentials to provide nursing care. Findings include: The facility's policy for Licensed Nurse Credentialing and License Verification, dated [DATE], documented the following: - Credentials and license are evaluated annually for performance appraisal for each licensed nurse. - Reverification of license is required at the intervals set by the Board of Nursing of this State. Licensed nurses are required to renew their license prior to the expiration of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-16 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, policy review, I&A report review, review of Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting minutes, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a QAPI plan was developed and implemented. This failure impacted 15 of 39 residents (#3, #12, #15, #16, #27, #33, #37, #39, #44, #46, #52, #57, #64, #73, and #281) whose records were reviewed for medication errors and had the potential to affect the other 38 residents residing in the facility. This created the potential for harm if residents received substandard quality of care from lack of identification and correction to quality deficiencies such as medication errors, staff training, and staff certification and licensure. Findings include: The facility's QAPI Plan, undated, documented: -Use quality assurance and performance improvement to make decisions to guide day-to-day operations. -Improve the quality of care and quality of life of residents with the outcome of QAPI. -QAPI includes all employees, all departments, and all services provided. -QAPI focuses on systems…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control measures were maintained. This was true when CNA #7 failed to remove personal protective equipment after coming in contact with a resident on enhanced barrier precautions, and RN#1 failed to perform hand hygiene prior to application of a clean dressing. This failed practice created the potential for adverse outcomes including infection due to cross contamination. Findings include: 1. The CDC website's article titled Consideration For Use Of Enhanced Barrier Precautions accessed on 5/23/25, documented effective implementation of EBP requires staff training on the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the availability of PPE with hand hygiene products at the point of care. On 5/13/25 at 9:34 AM, during a resident to staff interaction observation CNA #7 was observed leaving the shower room to take a resident back to his room while wearing a gown and a mask. CNA #7 took the resident to his room and removed her gown in his room before exiting. She then…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-16 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespread
  Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on personnel record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure an effective training program was maintained. This was true for 3 of 5 personnel records reviewed for training requirements. This failure created the potential for adverse outcomes including harm when staff were not educated on abuse protocols and did not have the minimum required training to provide direct care to residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 5/15/25 at 1:17 PM, during a personnel record review CNA #8's training record documented a total of 11.80 hours was completed out of the minimum annual 12-hour requirement. 2. On 5/15/25 at 1:21 PM, during a personnel record review CNA #9's training record documented a total of 1 hour was completed out of the minimum annual 12-hour requirement. CNA #9's record did not include training for abuse and neglect, dementia care, resident rights, and effective communication. On 5/16/25 at 10:01 AM, the Staff Development Coordinator stated CNA #8 and CNA #9 did not complete the training required and should have. 3. On 5/16/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, record review, review of the State Agency's Long-Term Care Reporting Portal, review of I&As, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #56) reviewed for abuse. This failure created the potential for residents to experience ongoing abuse and potential harm. Findings include: The facility's Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, revised February 2020, documented each resident has the right to be free from exploitation, verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, serious bodily injury, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. A review of the State Agency's Long-Term Care Reporting Portal, documented Resident #56 experienced abuse from the staff as follows: 1. A facility investigation report, received on 11/26/24, documented that on 11/19/24 at 10:15 PM, CNA #1 was observed standing in front of Resident #56 with his hands on Resident #56's upper arms and pushed him forcefully back down into the recliner and yelled Sit down. The facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on State Operation Manual Appendix PP, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to refer residents for further evaluation when residents were diagnosed with a new major mental illness. This was true for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #46) reviewed for PASRR level II evaluations. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if the residents' specialized services for mental health needs were not evaluated by an appropriate state-designated authority to provide coordinated care. Findings include: The State Operation Manual Appendix PP revised on 8/8/24, documented if a PASRR level I identified a major mental illness, an in-depth evaluation, known as a PASRR level II evaluation is completed by the state-designated authority, which must be completed prior to admission to a nursing facility. Resident #46 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder, PTSD, anxiety, and Major Depressive Disorder. Resident #46's PASRR level I,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's care plans were revised to reflect current needs and interventions. This was true for 2 of 18 residents (#17 and #52) whose care plans were reviewed. This deficient practice created the risk of adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided due to care plans not being revised as residents' needs changed. Findings include: The CMS SOM, Appendix PP, dated 8/8/24 documented a resident's care plan must be reviewed after each assessment and revised based on changing goals, preferences, and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions. 1. Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and PTSD. Resident #52's physician's orders documented: -Quetiapine (antipsychotic) was discontinued on 2/24/25. -Trazodone (antidepressant used as a sleep aid) was discontinued on 2/24/25. Resident #52's care plan, initiated on 8/29/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #38, #43) reviewed for bowel management. This failure created the potential for adverse outcome when standards of practice were not followed for bowel management. The CDC website's article titled, Guidelines on Bowel Care, accessed on 5/21/25 recommended that long-term care facilities prioritize bowel care and implement practices to prevent and manage constipation and other bowel-related issues, especially in residents at risk. This includes proactive strategies for residents with bowel incontinence or constipation. 1. Resident #38 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including mild cognitive impairment and hemorrhoids. Resident #38's care plan, revised 11/25/19, directed staff to offer bowel interventions and encourage Resident #38 to sit on the toilet to promote bowel movements. Resident #38's MAR, dated 3/1/25 -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID