Sunterra Springs Riverview

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

76.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 374 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 84.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 172 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 28.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.46 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.61 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.76 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the State Agency's Long-Term Care Reporting Portal, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This was true for Resident #171 and placed this resident in immediate jeopardy of serious harm, impairment, or death when LPN #1 and RN #2 failed to administer a high-risk medication. Findings include: Resident #171 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including pneumonia caused by influenza, hypertension, and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rate which can lead to blood clots and stroke). Resident #171's physician orders on admission included Xarelto (medication to treat or prevent blood clots) 20 mg by mouth, once a day at bedtime for prevention of deep vein thrombosis (blood clots). The US Food and Drug Administration approved medication guide written by the manufacturer of Xarelto stated, Do not stop taking Xarelto without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team had determined it was safe for a resident to self-administer medications. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #29) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This failure created the potential for adverse outcome if Resident #29 was to take her medications inappropriately. Findings include:The facility's Resident Self-Administration of Medication policy, revised 7/2024, documented residents had the right to self-administer medication and may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including hypertension, and GERD (a chronic digestive disorder where stomach acid frequently flows back into the esophagus). Resident #29's care plan revised 12/15/25, documented she had impaired vision…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in condition. This was true for 3 of 3 residents (#19, #37, and #48) reviewed for physician notification. This failure had the potential for harm if the physician was not provided with information necessary to make decisions to initiate and/or alter interventions to meet a resident's changing needs. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure for Weight Monitoring revised on 7/2024, documented the physician was to be notified of significant weight variances, which included gain or loss if any of the following occurred: 5% weight change in 30 days 7.5% weight change in 90 days 10% weight change in 180 days 1. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including fracture of the right femur, diabetes, and Crohn's Disease (a chronic inflammatory disease in the digestive tract). A Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, staff interview, record review, and review of the State Long Term Care Reporting System, it was determined that facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property and exploitation. This was true for 3 of 3 residents (#57, #58, and #59) reviewed for abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This failed practice created the potential for all facility residents to experience exploitation and misappropriation of property. Findings include:The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy revised 4/2025, stated the facility would prevent all types of abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of residents' property. The CMS SOM, Appendix PP dated 7/23/25, defined:- Exploitation, as taking advantage of a resident for personal gain, through the use of manipulation, intimidation, threats, or coercion.- Misappropriation of resident property, as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident specific discharge paperwork was provided to the hospital during transfer. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #47) whose records were reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential for harm if resident required health information not provided to the hospital. Findings include:The State Operations Manual Appendix PP issued 7/23/25, documented when the facility discharged a resident under any circumstances, the facility must ensure that the transfer or discharge was documented in the resident's medical record.Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including aftercare following a surgical procedure.Resident #47's Nursing Notes documented the following:On 11/6/25 at 9:47 AM - Resident #47 had scattered scabs on his hands and arms.On 11/6/25 at 2:41 PM - Resident #47 at the hospital.Resident #47's record did not include documentation why he was at the hospital.On 1/6/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' care plans were revised and updated as needed. This was true for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #54) whose care plan was reviewed. This created the potential for adverse outcomes if resident #54's care and services provided were not ordered by the physician. Findings include:Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including repeated falls, major depressive disorder, and anxiety.Resident #54's care plan initiated 12/29/25, documented Resident #54 was at risk for falls secondary to left sided weakness and directed staff to encourage the use of the call light and to keep resident's room free of clutter and tripping hazards.On 1/5/26 at 11:38 AM, Resident #54's bed was observed against the wall by the window. When asked about the location of her bed, Resident #54 stated staff moved her bed against the wall after she fell out of bed.On 1/8/26 at 10:50 AM, When asked if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care were followed for 3 of 12 residents (#48, #51, and #55) reviewed for quality of care. Resident #48 and #51's medications were not clarified from the physician. Resident #55 did not receive her therapy session as scheduled. These failed practices had the potential to adversely affect residents whose care and services were not delivered according to accepted standards of clinical practice. Findings include:1. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including, mild cognitive impairment, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), sepsis, and Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia (a progressive neurological disorder affecting movement). Resident #48's record documented the following Progress Notes: A Nursing Progress Note dated 11/1/25 at 3:04 PM, Resident #48's spouse brought medication in a bottle to the facility that read Carbidopa / Levodopa (medication for Parkinson's) ODT…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on personnel record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses performed tasks which they had the knowledge, skills, and competencies. This was true for 1 of 5 licensed nurses reviewed for completion of the required trainings and competencies necessary to care for resident's needs. This failure had the potential to affect all residents in the facility and increased the risk of harm to residents if staff were not trained on how to provide care and services to residents. Findings include:LPN #1's hire date was 9/26/25. Review of her personnel file did not document she had completed her onboarding training. LPN #1 completed 3 out of 24 of the assigned modules.On 1/9/26 at 12:00 PM, the Administrator confirmed LPN #1 had not completed her required training beyond the three she completed on 1/7/26 and stated she should not have been working with residents without completing all her training.On 1/9/26 at 12:15 PM, the DON stated all newly hired staff must complete their assigned training by the due date prior to working with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendation were addressed by the physician. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #31) whose pharmacy recommendations were reviewed. This failure created the potential for Resident #31 to receive medications that were ineffective. Findings include:Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including aftercare for fracture of right femur, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder.Resident #31's record documented the following physician's orders:lurasidone (an antipsychotic medication) oral tablet 20 mg, give 20 mg by mouth one time a day: take with 80 mg for 100 mg total. Start 12/18/25.An Interim Medication Regimen Review form included a section for the pharmacist to write his/her detailed description of irregularity and recommendations and a section for the physician to make a comment regarding the pharmacist recommendation.Resident #31's Interim Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs when a psychoactive medication was administered without adequate indication for its use. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #39) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents received medications that may result in negative outcomes without clear indication of need. Findings include:Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including depressive disorder, hypertension, and osteoporosis.Resident #39's physician's order for lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication) oral tablet 0.5 mg, give one by mouth every 24 hours as needed for anxiety.Resident #39's MAR documented she was administered lorazepam 0.5 mg oral tablet on 1/3/26 and again on 1/6/26.Resident #39's Monitor For Anxiolytic Use did not indicate she had anxiety symptoms or behaviors on 1/3/26 and 1/6/26.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from significant medication errors. This was true for 2 of 12 residents (#31 and #56) reviewed for medications. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents received the wrong dosage of medications. Findings include: The online Nursing 2025 Drug Handbook accessed on 1/12/26, stated the eight rights of medication administration were:Right drugRight patientRight doseRight timeRight routeRight reasonRight responseRight documentation 1. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including aftercare for fracture of right femur, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder.Resident #31's record documented the following physician's orders:Lurasidone oral tablet 20 mg, give 20 mg by mouth one time a day for antipsychotic: take with 80 mg for 100 mg total. Start 12/18/25.Resident #31's MAR dated 12/18/25 through 12/27/25 documented she received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-02-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SUNTERRA SPRINGS — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $921K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID