Countryside Care & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 28.2 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.97 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.91 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 98% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy review, and review of the Idaho Food Code, the facility failed to ensure staff wore beard nets in the kitchen and appropriately stored, distributed, and labeled foods. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination and use of spoiled foods, and adverse health outcomes including food-borne illnesses. Findings include:The Idaho Food Code, revised February 2021, documented, 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking . refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5 C (41 F) or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1.The Idaho Food Code,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, Department of Health and Welfare - Idaho Administrative rules, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2022 Food Code review, the facility failed to ensure garbage cans were properly closed with lids to minimize attracting pests and rodents into the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff in the facility. This placed residents and staff at risk of potential food contamination from bugs and rodents that may enter the kitchen due to the open garbage containers. Findings include:Department of Health and Welfare - Idaho Administrative Rules 16.03.02. Environmental Sanitation 108. Garbage and Refuse 03a. All containers used for storage of garbage and refuse shall be constructed of durable, nonabsorbent material and shall not leak or absorb liquids. Containers shall be provided with tight-fitting lids unless stored in vermin-proof rooms or enclosures, or in a waste refrigerator.U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2022 Food Code, 5-501.113 Covering Receptacles. Receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, State Operations Manual Appendix PP-Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents and their representatives received assistance to exercise their right to formulate an Advance Directive. This was true for 1 of 12 Residents (Resident #3) whose records were reviewed for Advance Directive. This deficient practice created the potential for harm or adverse outcomes if residents' wishes were not followed or documented regarding their advance care planning. Findings include:According to Appendix PP: DEFINITIONS S483.10(c)(6), (c)(8), (g)(12) Physician Orders for Life -Sustaining Treatment (POLST).a POLST form is not an advance directive. S483.10(g)(12) The facility must comply with the requirements specified in 42 CFR part 489, subpart I (Advance Directives), (iv) If an adult individual is incapacitated at the time of admission and is unable to receive information or articulate whether or not he or she has…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide the Advance Beneficiary Notice (CMS-10055 form) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) whose medical records were reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. This deficient practice had the potential to cause financial harm or distress for residents when they were not informed of their potential liability for payment when their Medicare Part A benefits ended. Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including stroke and hypertension.The facility had not provided an Advance Beneficiary Notice document to Resident #1 when he was discharged from Medicare Part A Skilled Nursing on 6/9/25 and admitted to the facility long term care unit on 6/10/25.On 9/9/25 at 2:30 PM, the Administrator stated Resident #1 should have received an Advance Beneficiary Notice document upon discharge and readmitted to the long-term care unit and had not been.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility standing orders, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow facility bowel care standing order of delivering specific medications when residents do not have BM within 24, 48, and 72 hours for 4 of 7 Residents (#1, #18, #24, and #26) who records were reviewed for bowel and bladder care. This failed practice created the potential for residents to experience discomfort when medications were not administered according to the physician's order. Findings include:The Countryside Care & Rehab Standing Orders for bowel protocol dated 1/14/25, documented: - (step 1) No BM X 24 hours: Prune Juice in AM. - (step 2) 48 hours no BM: Prune Juice in AM, no result, give Prune Juice in PM, - (step 3) No BM by day 3: Give Prune Juice in 30ml MOM. - (step 4) Day 4 no BM: Give Bisacodyl, supp or Fleets enema. - (step 5) Day 5 no BM: Complete assessment and notify PCP.a. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including stroke and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory services as ordered by the physician. This was true for 4 of 5 residents (#4, #13, #19, and #26) whose records were reviewed for respiratory services. This failure created the potential for residents to experience respiratory related infections, increased fatigue, and low oxygen levels. Findings include:The facility's Oxygen Administration policy undated documented change oxygen tubing and mask/cannula monthly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated. a. Resident #4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia and anxiety disorder.The facility oxygen audit for the month of August dated 8/25/25, documented Resident #4's oxygen tubing was last changed 7/2/25 and it should also have been replaced on 8/3/25 but was not. b. Resident #13 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that prior to the placement of bed rails, alternatives to bed rails were attempted and how the alternatives failed to meet the resident's assessed needs. This was true for 4 of 6 residents (#6, #7, #8, and #32) reviewed for bed rails. This failure created the potential for harm due to the risk for injury, entrapment and/or death. Findings include: The facility's policy, Proper Use of Bed Rails, revised 2024, stated it was the policy of the facility that the resident assessment must include an evaluation of the alternatives that were attempted prior to the installation or use of a bed rail and how these alternatives failed to meet the resident's assessed needs.if no appropriate alternatives are identified, the medical record should include evidence of the following; purpose for which the bed rail was intended and evidence that alternatives were tried and were not successful.a. Resident #6 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 1 of 1 medication cart reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility. Findings include:On 9/9/25 at 11:16 AM, during the medication cart audit, observed the narcotic accountability sheets, dated 2/1/25 to 9/9/25, with 3 licensed nurse signatures not documented. On 9/9/25 at 11:20 AM, LPN #1 stated two nurses should have signed the narcotic accountability sheet when they accepted the medication cart or released the medication cart. On 9/9/25 at 12:07 PM, the Administrator stated two nurses should have signed the narcotic accountability record when they accepted the medication cart or released the medication cart.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly sanitize the thermometer used to take temperatures of the food. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illnesses and infection for all residents receiving food from the facility kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Taking Accurate Temperatures, indicated that the probe should be cleaned, rinsed, sanitized, and air-dried before taking temperatures and immediately cleaned and re-sanitized after taking the temperature of each food. During an observation of the tray line on 09/18/24 at 11:30 AM, Cook1 was observed to take the thermometer out of her pocket and take the temperature of the food without sanitizing the thermometer before use. Cook1 was observed to use an alcohol swab to clean the thermometer after taking the temperature of the first item and re-use the same alcohol swab after taking the temperature of the next two food items. Cook1 then placed the thermometer back into her pocket. Cook1 then removed the thermometer and took…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for one resident (Residents (R)20) out of two residents reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 14 residents. This failure created the potential for residents to be, or to continue to be, abused/neglected. Findings include: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy dated 12/03/21 read, in pertinent part, It is the policy of the facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property; and Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation: A. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. Review of R20's admission Record, dated 09/19/24 and found in the electronic medical record (EMR)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in ID