No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Silverton Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia

405 West Seventh Street, Silverton, ID 83867 · For profit - Corporation · 55 certified beds · (208) 556-1147 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus Facility (federal watch list)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 20251 actual-harm citation$41,954 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $41,954 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-04)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

/5
CMS overall
Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verifiedNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facilityNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
100 Mckinley Ave · (208) 667-2600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
131 W Cameron Ave · (208) 784-6221 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
712 E Mullan Ave · (208) 752-5021 · Call to confirm hours
Park
I-90 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measuresNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2025-07, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2025-07 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.

Overall ratingnot rated now
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.5%15.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%5.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.2%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%2.0%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms19.3%15.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%3.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.8%16.1%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.6%16.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.8%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%3.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.7%22.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.5%20.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.0%86.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.3%17.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.1%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.271.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.241.661.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
39.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 39.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.2%CMS range 26.4–47.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 5.8–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge39.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
51.1%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 47.7 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-07-10)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2026-01-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-10-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This was true for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #8) whose medications were reviewed. This failure created harm to Resident #8 when she received an incorrect administration of medication requiring hospitalization. Findings include: The facility's Medication Errors policy, dated 8/1/23, documented a medication error was the preparation, or administration of drugs or biologicals that were not in accordance with the following: - Prescriber's order - Manufacture's specifications - Accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services. This policy was not followed. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including cerebral infarction (result of disrupted blood flow to the brain), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Resident #8's MAR for August 2023, documented a physician's order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's comprehensive care plans were revised to reflect current needs and interventions. This was true for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for care plans. This placed residents at risk of adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided due to care plans not being revised as residents' needs changed. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans and Conferences, revised 9/3/25, documented, The facility will ensure that each resident has a timely, person-centered, comprehensive care plan developed and maintained in accordance with professional standards of practice. The care plan will reflect the residents' individual conditions, risks, needs, behaviors, cultural values, and preferences, and will include measurable goals, appropriate interventions, and realistic timeframes. The plan will be created, reviewed, and revised by an interdisciplinary team…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to monitor vital signs as ordered by the physician. This was true for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #46) whose records were reviewed for quality of care. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if physician's orders were not followed, and if out-of-parameter vital signs were not monitored for resident safety. Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Vital Signs, revised 8/30/25, documented vital signs will be taken as ordered by the provider, which include oxygen saturation, temperature, blood pressure, and pulse. Vital signs must be documented in the resident's medical record immediately after measurement, abnormal or concerning vital signs, per resident's established baseline, must be reported to the licensed nurse for assessment and appropriate intervention. If a Resident shows signs of distress or a sudden change in condition, vital signs must be taken promptly, even if not scheduled.The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to complete an assessment for a wheelchair alarm prior to implementation. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #18) whose record was reviewed for comprehensive assessments. This deficient practice created the potential for psychosocial harm if Resident #18 felt restrained and physical harm if Resident #18 was not properly assessed prior to restraint placement. Findings include:The facility's policies, titled, Physical Restraints, revised 9/16/25, and Position Change Alarm Use, dated 9/16/25, defined Position Change Alarms as alerting devices intended to monitor a resident's movement emitting an audible sound when the resident moves in certain ways; the Interdisciplinary team (IDT) will conduct a thorough assessment to determine the appropriateness of restraint use. The decision to use a position change alarm is based on a comprehensive assessment of the resident's needs.Resident #18 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide food which was palatable and within resident's preferred temperature. This was true for all residents eating meals prepared by the facility. This deficient practice created the potential for decreased quality of life, incomplete meal intake due to dissatisfaction with meals. Findings include:On 1/5/26 at 11:35 AM, Resident #6 stated that her cold salads were served warm as it was placed on the hot food plate under the plate cover. She stated she preferred her salads cold, and she did not know why salads were not served with the cold beverages.On 1/6/26 at 12:31 PM, Resident #22 refused her lunch tray. The surveyor observed the cold salad had been placed on the hot food plate under the plate cover. A cold fruit bowl and juice were located next to the hot food plate.A review of resident council meeting minutes from August 2025 - December 2025 documented residents were not happy with certain meals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and the FDA Food Code, it was determined the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment when staff were observed without appropriate beard guard facial covers while in food preparation areas. This deficient practice created the potential for harm by placing residents at risk for potential foodborne illness, physical food contaminants, and adverse health outcomes. Findings include:The FDA Food Code Section 2-402.11 Effectiveness, documented, food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils, and linens. On 1/5/26 at 11:49 AM, [NAME] #1 was observed plating residents' food wearing a facial beard guard around his neck. When he made eye contact with the surveyor, he moved his beard guard over his chin and mouth with gloved hands and continued plating food. No hand hygiene was observed.On 1/6/26 at 11:58 AM, [NAME] #1 was observed plating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the discharge process notified required entities. This was true for 4 of 4 residents (#2, #7, #39, and #50) whose discharges were reviewed. The failure of the facility to notify the Office of the State LTC Ombudsman of each residents' discharge denied the residents added protection and advocacy of their right from being inappropriately transferred or discharged . Findings include: 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including muscle weakness, dementia, and a history of falls. Resident #2's record documented she required a transfer to the emergency department on 12/9/25 after a fall. The record documented a coordinated discharge with the receiving facility but did not include documentation the Ombudsman was notified of her discharge. 2. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for care following a surgery and treatment of multiple abscesses (pus-filled, infected pockets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Schedule II controlled substances were stored in a permanently affixed, secured compartment. This failure created the potential for drug diversion and misappropriation. Findings include:On 1/7/26 at 4:05 PM, a storage and labeling audit was conducted with LPN #1. Upon entering the medication room, LPN #1 unlocked the medication refrigerator. The Schedule II drug compartment inside the refrigerator was observed to have a black lock attached to the drawer. Upon further inspection, the black lock detached from the drawer, leaving all Schedule II medications accessible.On 1/7/26 at 4:09 PM, LPN #1 confirmed the compartment was not appropriately secured. He stated that to ensure the safety of Schedule II medications, the compartment should remain locked at all times.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and the residents goals and preferences. This was true for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #35) whose records were reviewed for quality of care. This failure created the potential for harm for Resident #35 when she experienced a change in condition, was not provided a nursing assessment, and diagnostic testing was delayed. Findings include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, diabetes, dementia, depression, and muscle weakness.On 12/26/25 at 11:18 AM, a doctor/nursing communication note documented Resident #35 continued to experience dizziness and weakness in her upper body as assessed by nursing. The medical provider documented a follow-up would be scheduled. On 12/30/25 at 12:00 AM, a physician's history and physical note documented a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure effective pain management was provided to residents. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #5) whose record was reviewed for pain management. This failure resulted in ongoing pain when Resident #5 was not evaluated to determine whether the current pain management plan was effective. Findings include:Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including a right humerus (upper arm bone) fracture, head injury, and iron deficiency anemia.Review of the admission Care Conference evaluation dated 12/23/25 documented the following goals:Goal #1: Get pain under controlGoal #2: Work with therapyA Pain Evaluation dated 12/23/25 documented Resident #5's acceptable pain level as 4/10.Review of Resident #5's MAR dated 12/23/25-1/7/26 documented the following pain management orders:Tylenol Extra Strength 500 mg, give 2 tablets by mouth three times daily for painOxycodone 5 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were supplied with routine medications as ordered. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #5) reviewed for medication availability. This failure created the potential for harm if Resident #5 experienced worsening anemia requiring timely supplementation. Findings include:Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including a right humerus fracture and iron deficiency anemia.Review of Resident #5's medical record documented a physician order for:Ferrous Gluconate 324 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth once daily for supplementation.On 1/7/26 at 9:08 AM, during a medication administration observation, MAC #1 was observed preparing medications for Resident #5. When reaching the final medication, MAC #1 informed the surveyor that the Ferrous Gluconate was not available in the facility.On 1/7/26 at 9:10 AM, MAC #1 stated the physician's order had been implemented on 12/24/25, but the medication had not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were maintained accurately and completely. This was true for 2 of 15 residents (#2 and #3) whose records were reviewed for accuracy. This failure created the potential for miscommunication and delayed treatment when documentation was missing or inaccurate. Findings include:1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including muscle weakness, dementia, and a history of falls.Review of Resident #2's record documented an unwitnessed fall on 12/9/25 at 5:50 PM.Resident #2's record included an INTERACT Hospital Transfer Form dated 12/9/25, intended to document the resident's most recent condition prior to transfer. The vital signs listed on the form were dated 12/3/25, which was six days prior to the transfer.On 1/7/26, the ADON confirmed the INTERACT Hospital Transfer Form contained inaccurate information, as the vital signs did not reflect Resident #2's condition at the time of transfer.2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide sanitary storage of PPE, and to perform appropriate hand hygiene. This was true for 2 of 15 residents (#6 and #33) whose staff infection control interactions were observed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm to residents if staff failed to provide appropriate infection control practices during wound care, medication administration, and PPE storage. Findings include: 1. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including stage 4 pressure ulcer of the right buttock (the most severe type of pressure damage, characterized by full-thickness skin and tissue loss), and paraplegia (paralysis from the waist down). Resident #6's care plan, dated 7/4/24, directed staff to use EBP to reduce the risk of MDRO transmission related to a suprapubic catheter and chronic wounds when providing direct care. The care plan further documented EBP should be used to prevent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of the State Agency's Long-Term Care Reporting Portal, and review of I&As, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents are free from abuse. This was true for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #9, #30, #51) whose records were reviewed for abuse. This created the potential for harm when Residents #9, #30, and #51 were struck by Resident #8. Findings include: The facility's Abuse policy revised 10/15/22, documented residents will remain free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. Including but not limited to corporal punishment. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbances and major depressive disorder. 1. Physical abuse directed by Resident #8 to Resident #30. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including muscle weakness, pain, and dementia. On review of the State Agency's Long-Term Care Reporting Portal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 5 of 5 residents (#4, #7, #26, #40, and #41) reviewed for bowel and bladder care. This failed practice created the potential for each of these residents to experience discomfort when their medications were not administered according to the physician's order. Findings include: 1.) Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, and constipation. An Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #4's decision making was poor, and she needed cues and/or supervision. A physician's order documented Resident #4 was to receive the following medications: -Milk of Magnesia (MOM) suspension 1200 milligram (mg) /15 milliliters (ml), give 30 ml orally as needed for no bowel movement (BM) for two days. Give 1 dose. If no results within 24 hours, see Dulcolax suppository order. -Dulcolax suppository 10 mg,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure (a) food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner and (b) drink wear was maintained in sanitary conditions. This deficient practice created the potential to affect 49 of 49 residents who consumed food and drinks prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for adverse outcomes, including food-borne illness. Findings include: a. On 6/23/25 at 10:10 AM, during a initial kitchen inspection a large brown box was observed in the dry goods pantry. The box contained large yellow onions noted with a green fuzzy substance on the surface of multiple onions. On 6/23/25 at 10:11 AM, when asked if the onions were in a safe condition to serve the Dietitian stated obviously we would not serve them to anyone. b. On 6/24/25 at 2:15 PM, during a in-depth kitchen inspection a bread toaster was identified sitting on a counter. The toaster was observed to contained a thick layer of black encrusted particles. Also, during the inspection multiple purple coffee cups were identified in a clean storage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Residents were monitored adequately to ensure residents were free from chemical restraints. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #23) whose records were reviewed for unnecessary medication. This failure caused the potential for more than minimal harm when Resident #23 was not able to participate in activities of daily living. Findings include:Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder, dementia, and insomnia.Resident #23's care plan revised 4/28/23, directed staff to monitor, document, and report to the MD changes in cognitive function such as difficulty expressing herself, level of consciousness, and mental status.A physician order dated 3/17/24, directed staff to monitor for the following side effects:1. Over-sedation / Lethargy2. Restless agitation3. Increased confusion/ poor concentration4. Mental status change5. Visual disturbances6.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments included correct assessment information. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #39) whose MDS records were reviewed for accuracy. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if residents were not assessed and/or monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include: The RAI Manual, revised 10/1/2024, documented section A1500, PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review), was to be coded yes when a PASRR Level II screening determines a resident had a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability, or related condition. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event), stimulant abuse and panic disorder. Resident #39's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' care plans were revised according to their needs. This was true for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #8) whose records were reviewed for care plan timing and revisions. This failure created the potential for harm when residents' needs were not identified and or met. Findings include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbances and major depressive disorder. Resident #8's care plan revised on 11/14/24, directed staff to investigate and identify potential triggers of target behaviors. The care plan also directed staff to use non-pharmacological interventions to reduce target behavior. Resident #8's care plan also directed staff to keep her within line of sight due to aggressive behaviors. The care plan did not include documentation of what triggered Resident #8 to become aggressive with others around her. On 6/26/25 at 3:21 PM, the DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of incident and accidents (I&A), staff interview, and The State Operation Manual, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent falls. This was true for 1 of 1 resident, (Resident #8) whose record was reviewed for falls. This had the potential to cause more than minimal harm to resident #8. Findings include:The State Operation Manual, Appendix PP, defined Avoidable Accident as an accident occurred because the facility failed to: Identify environmental hazards and/or assess individual resident risk of an accident, including the need for supervision and/or assistive devices.Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and history of falls.Resident #8's care plan revised on 8/27/23, directed staff to place personal items and assistive devises within reach.An I&A report dated 4/11/25 at 4:00 PM, documented a CNA assisted Resident #8 to transfer to the couch in the common…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation,resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure respiratory services were provided. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14) whose record was reviewed for respiratory services. This failure created the potential for harm when Resident #14's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine (a non-invasive ventilation machine) was not applied at bedtime. Findings include: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea and muscle weakness. Resident #14's care plan revised 7/4/24, directed staff to see the administration record for the application schedule. A physician order dated 3/30/25, directed staff to apply the CPAP machine at bedtime and remove in the morning. On 6/24/25 at 1:53 PM, Resident #14's CPAP machine was observed on a night stand next to her bed with no water in it. The mask was located directly on the floor near Resident #14's bed. On 6/25/25 at 9:39 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were educated on identifying mood, behaviors, and side effects. This failure created the potential for adverse outcomes when residents' records were not accurately reflecting residents' current condition. Findings include: On 6/26/25 at 1:45 PM, during a record review with the DON, she stated the facility had identified some concerns with resident documentation for mood, behavior, and side effects and had provided several opportunities for education with the staff. On 6/26/25 at 1:47 PM, a request for staff education was made and the following was provided: -On 3/26/24, the agenda listed CNA's were to be educated on notifying the nurse of behaviors for proper documentation however, no proof of education was provided. - On 6/5/25, the agenda listed documenting behaviors but no proof of education was provided. -On 11/7/24, the agenda listed documentation for behavior charting but no proof of education was provided. On review of the staff education provided no specific mood,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was on-site for 8 consecutive hours a day, for 7 days a week, to provide care to the residents. This was true for 3 of 21 days reviewed for sufficient staffing. This failure placed all residents at risk for harm if their routine and/ or emergency needs could not be met without the care of a registered nurse. Findings include: On review of the nursing staff hours worked, dated 6/1/25 through 6/21/25 the facility did not provide 8 consecutive hours of registered nurse coverage on 6/1/25, 6/14/25, and 6/15/25 (3 of 21 days). On 6/24/25 at 10:02 AM, the Administrator stated the facility did not have an RN for 8 consecutive hours on 6/1/25, 6/14/25 and 6/15/25.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Resident records contained accurate documentation. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #8 and #14) whose records were reviewed for accuracy. This failure had the potential for adverse outcomes and harm when Resident #8's record documents an inaccurate weight and when Resident #14's record documented inaccuracy of administration of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine (a non-invasive ventilation machine) use. Findings include: 1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dysphagia, lactose intolerance, and vitamin D deficiency. Resident #8's record documented the following weights: - On 1/7/25 her weight was 145 lbs. - On 2/12/25 her weight was 147 lbs. - On 3/4/25 her weight was 133 lbs. - On 4/25/25 her weight was 130.5 lbs. - On 5/13/25 her weight was 140 lbs. - On 6/ 3/25 her weight was 127 lbs. A Quarterly Nutritional assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee took action to identify and resolve systemic problems. This failure affected 49 of 49 residents residing in the facility. The deficient practice resulted in failure to identify resident mood, behaviors, and side effects for adverse outcomes when residents' record were not accurately documenting the residents current condition. Findings include: The facility's QAPI plan revised on 06/04/24, directed the QAPI committee to perform the following: - Meet at a minimum on a quarterly basis - Coordinating and evaluating QAPI program activities - Developing and implementing appropriate plan of action to correct identified deficiencies - Regularly review and analyze data collected under QAPI program and data resulting from drug regimen review and acting on available data to make improvements. - Determine areas for Performance Improvement Plans (PIP) for rapid improvement projects. On 6/26/25 at 2:05 PM, the DON stated she has been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, CDC recommendation review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention practices were maintained. This failure had the potential to impact all residents in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and transmission of infection. Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) web page titled, Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers, updated 2/27/24, documented hand hygiene should be performed: -Immediately before touching a patient. -Before performing an aseptic task such as placing an indwelling device or handling invasive medical devices. -Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient. -After touching a patient or patient's surroundings. -After contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfaces. -Immediately after glove removal. The following was observed for hand hygiene and Personal Protective equipment (PPE): On 6/24/25 at 2:50 PM, CNA #1 and CNA #2 were observed entering Resident #6's room to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, personnel record review, and administrative record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nurse aides and licensed nurses had completed competencies necessary to care for resident's needs. This was true for 16 of 19 CNAs (#1-#16) and 8 out of 9 licensed nurses (RN#1-#5) and (LPN#1-#3) whose training information was reviewed. This failure had the potential to affect all residents in the facility and increased the risk of harm to residents if CNAs and licensed nurses were not determined competent to provide care and services to residents. Findings include: The facility's CNA Clinical Competencies and Licensed Nurse Clinical Competencies forms, both undated, documented the competencies were to be completed by each employee upon hire and at least annually, signed and dated by the employee and instructor, and placed in the employee's education file. This procedure was not followed. On 10/3/23, surveyors requested the completed clinical competencies forms for all CNAs and licensed nurses. A printed list of completed trainings was provided on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was immediately notified when the resident had changes in condition. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #1 and #8) whose records were reviewed for changes of condition. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of harm due to lack of advocacy and support from their representatives. Findings include: The facility's Resident Change of Condition policy, dated 11/28/17, documented the facility was to immediately inform the resident and to consult with the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychological status, and need to alter significant treatment. This policy was not followed. 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including ulcerative pancolitis (inflammation affecting the entire…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to reflect current needs and interventions. This was true for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) whose care plans were reviewed. This placed Resident #2 at risk for adverse outcomes when his care plan was not revised to meet his needs. Findings include: The facility's Care Plan policy, revised on 10/15/22, documented a qualified person would monitor the resident's condition and effectiveness of the care plan interventions and revise the care plan quarterly, annually, and with a significant change in condition. This policy was not followed. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), respiratory failure, and chronic pain syndrome. An MDS significant change in condition assessment, dated 9/22/23, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure accuracy of narcotic counts. This was true of 2 of 8 residents (#1 and #2) whose narcotic logs were reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications. Findings include: The facility's Pharmacy Services policy, dated 11/28/17, documented the facility provided pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident. Periodic reconciliation of records of receipts, disposition, usage, and inventory for all controlled medications were conducted. The reconciliation identified loss or potential diversion of controlled medications. This policy was not followed. a. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including ulcerative pancolitis (inflammation affecting the entire colon), and pain.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored appropriately and offered non-pharmacological interventions while receiving opioid pain medications. This was true for 2 of 3 residents (#1 and #2) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure created the potential for residents to experience adverse reactions due to a lack of appropriate monitoring or increased pain due to not offering non-pharmacological interventions. Findings include: The facility's Unnecessary Medications and Psychotropic Drugs/Antipsychotic Medication policy, dated 11/28/17, documented a resident's medication regime was free of any medication used in excessive dose, excessive duration, without adequate monitoring, without adequate indications for use, in the presence of adverse consequences or any combination of these reasons. This policy was not followed. 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to safeguard medical records from unauthorized use. This was true for all residents whose records were accessed by a facility MA (MA #1) for the purpose of medication administration on 10/2/23 and 10/3/23. This deficient practice resulted in MA #1 accessing medical records, using an individualized login identifier which belonged to a facility RN (RN #2), and created the potential for harm when the access was documented incorrectly, and confidentiality of the records was not maintained. Findings include: The facility's policy Medication Aide-Certified in Skilled Nursing Facility, released 11/28/17, and revised on 8/1/23, documented, Medication and acts completed by the certified medication aide are accurately documented on the medication/treatment administration record. According to the Idaho Administrative Procedure Act (IDAPA), 24.34.01, Idaho Administrative Code, Division of Occupational & Professional Licenses, Rules of the Idaho Board of Nursing, updated 3/28/23 Section 200 - Practice Standards:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$41,954 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $41,954 — penalty dated 2023-10-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CASCADIA IDAHO OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2023
CASCADIA HC GROUP LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/05/2025
CASCADIA HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2023
CASCADIA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/05/2025
HAMMOND, OWENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2023
LAFORTE, STEPHENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
NELSON, TIMOTHYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/05/2025
SILVERTON 405 REALTY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 06/05/2025
WHITE OAK HEALTHCARE FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 08/11/2022
CASCADIA SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2025
MEZA, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2025
NAHMENSEN, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$250K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 9%Other / private 24%

This home reported $250K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$332per resident / day
operating cost
$10,096per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$365per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Idaho Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Idaho
$10,494/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,175/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 135058. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next