New Summit Rehabilitation and Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 499 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 328 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 95.7 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.45 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.57 to 1.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have fall interventions in place for a resident at risk for fall and failed to ensure a resident was transferred safely for 2 of 20 residents (R33 and R36) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 20. This failure resulted in R36 falling and sustaining a right ankle fracture that required surgical repair. The finding include: 1. R36's Face Sheet shows that she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: cellulitis of right and left lower limbs, unsteadiness of feet, abnormalities of gait, reduced mobility and morbid obesity. R36's Functional Status Note dated 4/29/25 shows that R36 requires partial/moderate assistance to stand from sitting and transfer from bed to chair. On 6/9/25 at 11:35 AM, R36 was lying in bed. R36 had a cast on her right lower leg. R36 said that she fell in the bathroom and broke her leg. On 6/10/25 at 10:20 AM, V34 (R36's Spouse) said that he came in on 5/11/25 and R36 was sitting on the bathroom…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a cervical neck collar and ace wraps were in place as ordered, failed to clarify physician prescribed medication orders to ensure a resident received the medications and failed to perform an assessment immediately after and following a fall for 4 of 20 residents (R36, R52, R47 and R299) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. On 6/9/25 11:35 AM, R36 was lying in bed and had a cast on her right lower leg. R36 said that she had a fall in the bathroom and broke her leg. On 6/10/25 at 10:20 AM, V34 (R36's Spouse) said that he came in on 5/11/25 and R36 was on the floor of the bathroom. V34 said that a male and female staff member came in and lifted her back up into her wheelchair. V34 said that a couple days later, he noticed that her leg was bruised, and her foot was pointed in an abnormal position. On 6/10/25 at 12:19 PM, V22, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) said that on 5/11/25, R36 had a fall in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure resident refrigerators were monitored and maintained, and failed to ensure perishable foods were dated which applies to 7 of 7 residents (R33, R55, R67, R65, R298, R199, R80) reviewed for safe food handling in a sample of 20. The findings include: On 6/9/25 at 9:00 AM, R33's room refrigerator thermometer read 55 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The refrigerator had yogurt and other personal food products in it. R33 was eating a yogurt of the same brand at that time. On 6/10/25 at 1:20 PM, R33's refrigerator thermometer read 50 degrees F. V26 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was present at that time and verified the temperature reading on the thermometer. V26 stated they were pretty sure that was too high. On 6/9/25 at 9:15 AM, R55's room refrigerator had no thermometer in it. The refrigerator had 10 small foam food containers with no dates on them. R55 stated their daughter brought food from home for him all the time. R55 did not know how long the different items had been in the refrigerator. On 6/9/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. On 6/9/25 at 11:35 AM, R36 was lying in bed. R36 said that she is getting treatment for the wounds on her buttock. R36's room door did not have a sign on it saying she was on EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) nor was there PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) outside of R36's room. On 6/9/25 at 11:37 AM, V7 (Infection Preventionist) put an EBP sign on R36's door and a cart of PPE outside of the door. On 6/9/25 at 2:25 PM, V7 said that she did just put R36's EBP sign on her door that day. V7 said that she was reviewing charts and noticed that R36 came back from the hospital with multiple wounds and should have been placed on EBP upon her re-admission. R36's Physician's Order Sheet printed on 6/9/25 shows that she re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] and an order for EBP for wounds was placed on 6/9/25. R36's Wound assessment dated [DATE] shows that she has an unstageable pressure injury on her left hip, right hip and buttock and a stage 3 pressure injury on her left lower buttock. The facility's Enhanced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's assessment was completed accurately for 1 of 20 residents (R95) reviewed for assessments in the sample of 20. The findings include: R95's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows Discharge status: short term General Hospital (acute hospital). R95's Progress Notes dated 3/28/25 at 4:28 PM shows Resident discharged home with granddaughter, to receive home health care. Resident discharged with all scripts, paperwork and belongings. On 06/11/25 at 10:25 AM, V5 Director of Nursing said R95's MDS was done in error, R95 was not hospitalized she went home with family per the progress notes. On 06/11/25 at 11:53 AM, V1 Chief Executive Officer said the facility doesn't have a policy on assessments, they just follow the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) procedure and are to submit MDS assessments timely and accurately.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident had a dressing on a pressure injury and failed to ensure pressure prevention interventions were in place for 2 of 6 residents (R47, R299) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. R47's Wound Assessment Details Report completed on 6/7/25 shows he has a stage 4 pressure injury to his left heel. The report shows his wound measures 1.00 centimeter (cm.) length x 1.00 cm. width x .20 cm. depth with a light amount of drainage. R47's Physician Order Summary shows he has treatment orders for medi-honey and a dry dressing over the wound bed. On 6/9/25 at 9:50 AM, V14 (Wound Care Nurse) and V15 (Wound Care Nurse Practitioner) were completing a wound assessment on R47's left heel wound. When V14 pulled off R47's sock there was no dressing on his left heel. V14 said R47 should have a dressing on his wound and he has orders for dressing changes 3 times a week and as needed. V14 said any nurse can…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheter bags were kept below the level of the bladder and off of the floor to prevent infections for 2 of 3 residents (R148 and R47) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. On 6/9/25 at 9:08 AM, R148 was being transferred from her bed to a shower chair with a mechanical lift. R148 had an indwelling urinary catheter in place with cloudy yellow urine present in the tubing. V19 and V20 (Certified Nursing Assistants) placed a mechanical lift sling under R148. V19 and V20 attached the sling to the mechanical lift and then hung R148's catheter bag on the sling strap which was above R148's bladder. R148's urine in her catheter tubing was seen backflowing into R148's bladder. On 6/10/25 at 11:02 AM, V5 (Director of Nursing) said that urinary catheter bags should always be kept below the level of the bladder. V5 said that hanging the bag from the straps of the mechanical lift sling is not appropriate. R148's Care Plan shows, Position catheter bag…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor residents to ensure medications were administered completely which applies to 2 of 2 residents (R1, R4) reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 20. The findings include. 1. R1's Facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 to be a [AGE] year-old female resident with severe cognitive impairment admitted with diagnoses which included dementia. On 6/9/25 at 10:55 AM, R1 was resting in their wheelchair in the common area near the nurse's station. When R1 went to speak 2 partially dissolved pills fell out of R1's mouth. R1 was appeared very tired and had some confusion when asked when they had taken their pills. On 6/9/25 at 11:00 AM, V29 Registered Nurse stated R1 had received their medications with the morning medication pass around 9 AM. V29 stated they thought R1 had swallowed all their pills. V29 stated they did not check for pocketing after the medications were given. On 6/10/25 at 10:00 AM, V16 Licensed Practical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for a high fall risk resident which applies to 1 or 6 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in a sample of 16. The findings include: R1's admission Record printed on 3/10/25 showed R1 is an eighty five year old female resident admitted to the facility with diagnoses which include post surgical amputation, reduced mobility, needing assistance with personal care, absence of left leg below the knee. R1's Fall assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 is at High Risk for Falling. On 3/10/25 at 11:50 AM, R1 was sitting in their wheelchair with the bedside table across them eating lunch. R1 stated she was admitted to the facility after having her left lower leg amputated after having blood flow complications in her leg. R1's call light was wrapped around the bed rail on the opposite side of the bed from R1. R1 stated she would not be able to reach that. R1 demonstrated by leaning towards bed. The call light was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure treatment orders were performed for a resident with a stage 3 sacral pressure injury. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 6. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows she is a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses including spinal stenosis, history of falling, quadriplegia, unspecified injury at C4 level of cervical spinal cord, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, neurogenic bowel, reduced mobility, muscle weakness and history of malignant neoplasm of the breast. R1's Wound Progress note dated 8/22/24 documents a stage 3 pressure wound to the sacrum, full thickness, measuring 7.1 cm (centimeters) x 4.5cm x 0.2 cm with moderate serous drainage. R1's Wound Progress note dated 8/29/24 documents a stage 3 pressure wound to the sacrum, full thickness, measuring 3.2 cm x 2.1 cm x 0.2 cm with moderate serous drainage. R1's Medication Administration Record (M.A.R.) dated August 2024 shows treatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to initiate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for residents with an increased risk of contracting a Multi-drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) during high contact activities for 8 of 10 residents (R198, R292, R22, R287, R190, R301, R203, R291) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 14 and 7 residents (R29, R202, R30, R294, R204, R200, R201) outside the sample. The findings include: The facility Matrix provided on 5/7/24 showed the following residents had invasive medical devices and/or pressure ulcers: R287, R198, R291, R190, R202, R30, R301, R203, R201, R22, and R200. The facility's Wound Report dated May 2024 showed the following residents had chronic wounds (pressure ulcers, venous stasis ulcers, or diabetic ulcers): R198, R292, R29, R202, R30, R294, R204, R22, and R200. A facility wide tour was conducted on 5/7/24 and 5/8/24, the residents listed above did not have EBP signs on door, nor did they have an isolation cart with PPE…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-05 for 58 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL