Thrive Of Fox Valley

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 730 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 328 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.96 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 65.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.82 to 1.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment for residents. This applies to 3 of 5 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for housekeeping services in the sample of 5. Findings include:On May 4, 2026, at 9:30 AM, V3 (Housekeeper) stated it's impossible to get everything cleaned when they have only two housekeepers working on the floor. They have two housekeepers on the floor cleaning and one person in the laundry room today. V3 stated they have been working short and if the census drops, they will send staff home; however, with the third housekeeper gone, they still have the same amount of work to do. On May 4, 2026, at 10:18 AM V4 (Housekeeper) stated they normally have three housekeepers except when it's one of their days off or if someone calls off. V4 stated today is V12's (Housekeeper) day off. V4, stated sometimes they cut a housekeeper when the census drops but things are still dirty and need to be cleaned. V4 stated that when there are only two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide educational instructions for a resident (R5) discharging with a cardiac monitor.This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R5) reviewed for discharges.The findings include:R5's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) said he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including a new onset of cardiomyopathy, which required the use of a cardiac vest monitoring device. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/20/2026 said he was cognitively intact and able to follow instructions. The EMR said he was discharged home on 3/20/2026, still requiring the use of the monitor.On 4/01/2026 at 12:30 PM, V21 (Registered Nurse/RN) said she readmitted R5 on 3/06/2026 and routinely cared for R5 during his stay at the facility. V21 said R5 did not have cardiac monitoring orders during his stay, and she forgot to enter them when he was readmitted . V21 said the orders were needed to ensure the monitor was checked to be working properly every shift. V21 said R5's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and treat a resident's (R2) skin conditions as ordered.This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for skin care.The findings include:R2's care plan said she had actual and was at risk for further skin impairment due to her left lower leg cellulitis and chronic lymphedema. The care plan's interventions included for the nursing staff to evaluate and treat her skin as ordered. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/25/2026 said she was cognitively intact. R2's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed she had an active order for Nystatin powder (antifungal) to be applied to under her breast twice a day and wound consults as needed.On 3/27/2026 at 11:40 AM, R2 said she was upset and frustrated because on the evening of 3/26/2026, she requested V5 (Registered Nurse/RN) to assess her new open wound to her left anterior thigh but V5 did not assess or treat her wound. R2 said she was concerned regarding skin impairment because she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to safely transport a resident (R1) in a wheelchair, resulting in him falling and sustaining multiple lacerations.This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents.The findings include:R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including chronic renal failure, dependent on hemodialysis, unsteadiness on his feet, need for assistance with personal care, reduced mobility, and glaucoma. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/22/2026 said he was cognitively intact and was dependent with his transfers and lower body care needs. R1's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 1/15/2026 said he was at a high risk for falls. The EMR said he was transferred to the hospital on 3/11/2026 after he sustained a witnessed fall and did not return to the facility.On 3/31/2026 at 1 PM, R1 was interviewed over the phone. R1 said on 3/11/2026, V10 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) was wheeling him in a wheelchair down…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer a resident's (R2) as needed analgesic when requested.This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pain management.The findings include:R2's care plan said she had the potential for pain due to her chronic pain syndrome. The care plan had multiple interventions, including her need to receive her opioid medication as ordered. Also, for the staff to anticipate her need for pain relief and respond immediately to any complaint of pain. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/25/2026 said she was cognitively intact. R2's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed she had an active order for Norco (analgesic) 10-325 mg (milligrams) one tablet every six hours as needed for pain.On 3/27/2026 at 11:40 AM, R2 said she was upset and frustrated because on the evening of 3/26/2026, she called to request Norco and did not receive it when requested. R2 said V7 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) responded to her call light multiple times after she continued to call repeatedly for her medication. R2 said V7 informed her she had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor, document, and care plan a resident with a cholecystostomy drain and failed to provide care and services for a resident needing staff assistance for 2 of 4 residents (R2, R4) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 4. The findings include: 1. On 3/18/25 at 11:06 AM, R4 was sitting up in a wheelchair in her room. R4 had a cholecystostomy drainage bag sitting next to her in the wheelchair. R4 stated she had a gallbladder attack in hospital and the bag is from that. R4 stated there is some drainage into the bag and the nurses drain it. R4 lifted her shirt and showed this surveyor the cholecystostomy incision site on the right side of her abdominal area. R4's incision site had gauze covering the insertion area with the drainage tube coming out. The gauze was covered with a transparent dressing. The gauze had a nickel size dried brownish red area of drainage around the drainage tube. There was no date on either dressing.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have clear resident care policies to ensure a resident's neurological evaluations were completed and monitored after an unwitnessed fall. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 5. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet showed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included personal history of pulmonary embolism, other pulmonary embolism with acute cor pulmonale, personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and cerebral infarction without residual effects. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) showed moderate cognitive impairment. R1's 10/4/2024 progress note written by V13 (on-call Physician) from 9:00 PM showed she experienced an unwitnessed fall and was on a blood thinner. The Orders section showed Assess pain per protocol and Monitor with neuro-checks per protocol. The facility's Post-Fall policy (revised 5/2023) showed If the resident reports hitting head, if there is any indication of head injury, or if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to resolve Resident Council and individual resident's concerns regarding extended wait times for call light response. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R4) reviewed for improper nursing care related to call light response times, in the sample of 4. The findings include: The Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated May 23, 2024, showed . 7. Guests (residents) voiced they take a long-time answering call light. Resolution: This was communicated to Director of Nursing and Administration There were 6 patients (residents) in attendance at the meeting. The Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated June 26, 2024, attended by 5 patients (residents), showed under New (business) .1. Guest (resident) complained about the call lights not being answered quickly and voiced she understands the aides have a lot of people to take care of, but facility can get more help for CNAs and nursing would be great. The Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated July 24, 2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications timely in accordance with the facility policy. This applies to 2 of 3 (R2, R4,) in a sample of 3 reviewed for timely administration of medications. The findings include: R4's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including [NAME] Barre Syndrome, [NAME] Nile virus, pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale, And generalized muscle weakness. R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated July 23, 2024, showed R4 was cognitively intact, and was dependent on staff assistance with ADLs including eating, oral hygiene, bed mobility, bathing, dressing, toilet hygiene, and transfer. R4's Medication Administration Audit report, dated July 26, 2024-July 27, 2024, showed R4 medication scheduled to be administered at 9:00 AM, included Amlodipine Besylate tablet 2.5 mg, (milligrams) daily, Metoprolol Tartrate tablet 25 mg, twice a day, Apixaban 5 mg. twice a day, Aspirin 81 mg. daily,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label, date, seal, and store food items in the kitchen. This applies to all residents that receive oral nutrition and foods prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (Form CMS-Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-671) dated 7/23/24 documents that the total census was 57 residents. On 7/25/24 at 12:14 AM, V11 (Dietician) said there are zero NPO (Nothing by Mouth) residents that do not eat from the facility kitchen. On 7/23/24 starting at 9:55 AM, the facility kitchen was toured in the presence of V9 (Dietary Manager). V9 stated, frozen items can be used for six months from the date it is received. The following expired items were observed in the refrigerator/freezer: 1. Feta Cheese, crumbled, 2 bags of 5 lbs each with received date of 1/13/23. 2. Cheese Ravioli 2 bags of 5 lbs each with received date of 11/10/23. 3. Chopped Spinach 12 bags of 2 lbs each with received date of 11/14/23. 4. Eggo Frozen waffles: 5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL