No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Batavia Rehabilitation and Health Care Center

520 Fabyan Parkway, Batavia, IL 60510 · For profit - Corporation · 63 certified beds · (630) 879-5266 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Call the home — (630) 879-5266 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (23) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
501 W Fabyan Pkwy, Batavia, IL 60134 · (630) 524-2445 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens1.0 mi
1918 W Fabyan Pkwy · (630) 482-2485 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1942 W Fabyan Pkwy · (630) 879-3234 · Call to confirm hours
Park
651 Redwing Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased32.1%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%6.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms79.6%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.1%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.4%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.2%18.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.7%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.2%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.9%21.7%17.1%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.65
RN hours/ resident / day
0.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.96
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.56
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 63 beds and averages 39.2 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.96 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.05 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-05)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by an employee. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for physical abuse. This past noncompliance occurred from 8/24/2025 to 9/10/2025. Findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record/EMR) showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including dementia with mood disturbances of restlessness and agitation. R1's Abuse Risk assessment dated [DATE] said she was at risk for abuse due to her mental, emotional, physical, and behavioral changes related to her dementia. R1's care plan said she required staff to give her time and redirection to minimize her behaviors. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/12/2025 said she was severely cognitively impaired. On 12/08/2025 at 9:15 AM, R1 was calmly sitting in the common area. R1 was severely cognitively impaired and unable to be interviewed regarding her reported abuse incident on 8/24/2025. At 10 AM, V8 (Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 8 hours of RN (Registered Nurse) coverage on 20 days during the past 6 months. This applies to all 37 residents who reside in the facility. The findings include: The PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) report for quarter 4 2024, showed dates in December when there was no RN on duty. V2 (Director of Nursing) provided documentation to show she was the RN on some of those December dates. Review of the staffing schedule with V2 showed that December 7, 8, 22, 25, and 29, 2024 did not have any hours of RN coverage working in the facility. V2 stated on June 3, 2025, at 11:12 AM, that the facility does use agency staff. V2 stated she had to work out a system with payroll to report V2 hours as RN coverage for PBJ. V2 stated she works Monday through Friday and provides the RN coverage on those days. Review of January, February, March, April, and May 2025, staffing schedules with V2, showed there was no RN coverage for 8 hours, and V2 did not work on the following days: January 1, 4, 5, 18 and 19, 2025, February 13, 2025, March 1,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and present a facility QAPI (Quality assurance Performance Improvement) plan. This applies to all 37 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated June 2, 2025, shows the facility census was 37. On June 3, 2025, V1 (Administrator) provided a document QAPI Policy, dated January 2024, and stated the document was the facility's QAPI plan. The document shows, The QAPI Program takes a systematic, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality while involving all caregivers in practical and creative problem solving. The community QAPI Program achieves the following: monitor quality/performance, find opportunities for improvement, improve performance, achieve resident/family desired outcomes, meet regulatory requirements, understand the CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) survey process and regulations, provide a QAPI path to correcting issues. The QAPI Program consists of monthly/quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a water management plan for Legionella which included ways to intervene when control limits are not met and to document control measures for the prevention of Legionella growth. The facility also failed to follow their Infection Prevention and Control Program for surveillance of infections. This applies to all 37 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The facility's Long-term Care Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated June 2, 2025, showed the facility's census was 37 residents. 1. On June 4, 2025, at 2:19 PM, V10 (Maintenance Director) said for the facility's water management plan for Legionella, V10 empties the hot water heaters about once a month but does not empty the kitchen's hot water heater because there is a water softener. V10 said the only thing he does with the shower heads is replace them when they break which is about three times a year. On June 4, 2025, at 2:26 PM, V1 (Administrator) said V10 should be following the facility's water management plan for Legionella. V1 said he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an Antibiotic Stewardship Program with a standardized tool and criteria to assess residents for infections. This applies to all 37 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The facility's Long-term Care Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated June 2, 2025, showed the facility's census was 37 residents. On June 3, 2025, at 1:54 PM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) said she has been the facility's Infection Preventionist since 2020. V2 said she used to perform McGeer's Criteria for infections but stopped some time last year. V2 said she does not use a standardized tool for data collection of resident infections to identify if a resident has an infection. V2 said the facility does not have a current Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy. On June 4, 2025, at 10:18 AM, V2 said she had been behind on tracking resident antibiotic use in April 2025 because V2 had to work on the floor as a nurse. V2 said she was unable to keep up with her work. The facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. This applies to 3 of 5 residents (R13, R18, and R21) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 14. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, paranoid personality disorder, Alzheimer's disease, and unspecified mood disorder. R18's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 31, 2025, showed R18 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. R18's Order Summary Report dated June 3, 2025, showed an active medication order dated April 18, 2025, for Haloperidol (antipsychotic medication) Lactate Oral Concentrate 2 mg (milligrams)/ mL (milliliters), give 0.75 mL by mouth every two hours as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. R19's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2023, with diagnoses that included dementia unspecified severity with psychotic disturbances, anxiety, depression, and PTSD. R19's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 31, 2025, showed R19 had mild cognitive impairment, and her active diagnoses included anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder, and PTSD (Post-traumatic stress disorder). R19's care plan showed there was no assessment of R19's diagnosis of PTSD, identification of PTSD triggers, or interventions to assist with R19's PTSD. R19's Social Service Quarterly Assessments showed there was no documentation that R19 had PTSD. On June 2, 2025, at 2:27 PM, R19 said she has had a lot of trauma in her life and she didn't know if facility knew that or knew what her triggers were. On June 4, 2025, at 12:22 PM, V7 (LCSW/Licensed Clinical Social Worker) said R19 does have a diagnosis of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) but said R19's PTSD is not active, meaning she has no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviewed the facility failed to date and contain resident's oxygen equipment for a resident with oxygen concentrator in their room. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R25) reviewed for oxygen use in the sample of 14. The findings include: R25's admission record showed R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, history of pneumonia and bipolar disorder. R25's physician order summary showed R25 had an order for oxygen 2-3L (liters) per NC (Nasal Cannula) as needed for shortness of breath, initiated on May 31, 2025. On June 2, 2025, at 12:51 PM, R25's room had an oxygen concentrator in the room with tubing and nasal cannula that was undated and stored draped over the concentrator and touching the floor. There was no oxygen in use sign on the door to the room. R25's progress note dated May 22, 2025, at 3:10 PM showed R25 experienced shortness of breath and used oxygen 3L per NC for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident with PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder) and identify triggers. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R19) reviewed for trauma informed care in a sample of 14. The findings include: R19's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2023, with diagnoses that included dementia unspecified severity with psychotic disturbances, anxiety, depression, and PTSD. R19's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 31, 2025, showed R19 had mild cognitive impairment, and her active diagnoses included anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder, and PTSD. R19's Social Service Quarterly Assessments showed there was no documentation that R19 had PTSD. R19's POS (Physician Order Set) showed there were no orders to monitor for triggers or behaviors related to R19's diagnosis of PTSD. On June 2, 2025, at 2:27 PM, R19 said she has had a lot of trauma in her life and she didn't know if facility knew that or knew what…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive an unnecessary medication. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R4) reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 14. The findings include: Face sheet, dated June 4, 2025, shows R4's diagnoses included urinary tract infection. Hospital records, printed December 14, 2024, show R4's diagnoses included complicated UTIs (Urinary Tract Infections). POS (Physician Order Sheets), printed June 4, 2025, shows the following physician orders: Bactrim 400-80 mg (milligrams) one tablet daily every Monday, Wednesday and Friday- start date April 1, 2025, and to be given indefinitely. Nursing progress note, dated April 13, 2025, shows R4 was sent to the hospital after experiencing weakness and lack of responsiveness. Review of R4's hospital discharge record, printed April 13, 2025, shows no orders for Keflex or Bactrim on the after visit summary medication list. The discharge record shows R4's diagnoses included UTIs (Urinary Tract Infection). Nursing progress notes, dated April 13, 2025, shows R4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 13 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to puree food items to a smooth consistency per their facility policy. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R2, R18, R22) reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 14. The findings include: On June 3, 2025, at 11:25 AM, V4 (Cook) was preparing pureed diets. He said there are three residents with pureed diet orders in the facility. V4 was preparing pureed spaghetti with meat sauce and pureed green beans. V4 used tongs and placed three servings of noodles into the food processor and then he used the four-ounce scoop per the recipe and placed three scoops of meat sauce into the food processor with the noodles. Per the recipe, he also added three ounces of water and blended it. Visually, there were small pieces of unblended noodles and meat. When tasted, there were small pieces of noodles and meat that needed to be chewed. V4 pureed fresh green beans by taking the four-ounce scoop and placing three servings into the food processor with 1/4 tsp chicken base, three ounces of water, 2 3/4 tsp of thickener. After he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label/date/seal/store items, discard expired items, ensure the chloride dishwasher and quaternary sanitation bucket strips are not expired, and wear hair restraints while in the facility kitchen. This applies to all residents that receive oral nutrition and foods prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (Form CMS-Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-671) dated 8/13/24 documents that the total census was 30 residents. On 8/13/24 at 10:38 AM, V11 (Dietary Manager) said all residents eat from the facility kitchen; there are no NPO (Nothing by Mouth) residents. On 8/13/24 starting at 10:10 AM, the facility kitchen was toured in the presence of V11 (Dietary Manager). For the entirety of the kitchen tour, V11 did not wear a hair restraint or beard restraint. During the kitchen tour, the following was found: In the kitchen refrigerator: 1. A package of opened turkey breast deli meat. Deli meat was in its original…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to enter a physician's order that reflects the resident chosen code status. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R7 and R21) reviewed for advanced directives in a sample size of 18. Findings include: 1. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R7 has medical diagnoses that includes cerebral infarction, aphasia, hypertension, lymphedema, morbid obesity, hemiplegia and hyperlipidemia. On [DATE] at 11:24 AM, V13 RN (Registered Nurse) stated residents are identified as a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) by the red circular sticker on their chart and the advanced directives at the front of their chart. V13 stated R7 was a DNR although R7 had a red sticker on her chart. The chart had no advanced directives or POLST (Practitioner Order fir Life Sustaining Treatment) form or current DNR physician's order. On [DATE] at 12:20 PM, V8 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) assigned to R7 stated R7 is considered a full code because there is not a completed POLST or current physicians…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to preserve a resident's privacy and dignity. This applies to one resident R8 reviewed for privacy in a sample size of 18. Finding include: R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes transient ischemic attack, peripheral vascular disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, leg weakness, hypothyroidism, osteopenia and macular degeneration. On 8/13/24 at 1:51 PM, V5 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) provide R8 incontinence care and left the bedroom window curtains open. R8's first floor room window is clearly visible to the parked cars near her window. As V5 stepped away from R8 to retrieve supplies from the bathroom leaving R8 exposed from the waist down; R8 exclaimed my butt, and everything is on display. V5 CNA informed R8 she only exposed her to get her cleaned up. On 8/14/24 at 3:44 PM, V3 DON (Director of Nursing) stated the standard practice is to close the curtains while providing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an accurate fall risk assessment after a fall. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R16) reviewed for falls in a sample of 18. The findings include: R16 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] having severe cognitive impairment as per the MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/3/24. Record review on fall risk assessment dated [DATE] documents that R16 is at high risk for falls. Record review of the facility presented fall policy revised on 11/10/18 document: 1. Conduct fall assessment on the day of admission, quarterly, and with a change in condition. 2. Identify the resident's risk for falls on admission. A visual prompt (red star) may be placed on the name plaque by the entrance to the residents' room This system provides staff with a visual alert to monitor those at risk for falls. On 8/14/24 at 1:00 PM, no red star was observed with R16's name plaque at the door side. On 8/14/24 at 2:10 PM, during the infection control task, V3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care for residents who required assistance from staff. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R15, R8) reviewed for ADL care in a sample of 18. The findings include: 1. On August 13, 2024, at 11:25 AM, R15 appeared to have fingernails which were 1.5 inches long on both hands. R15 said the staff do not cut his nails and the staff do not do anything for him. On August 14, 2024, at 9:28 AM, R15 still had long fingernails and his toenails were between 0.5 inches to 1 inch long. On August 15, 2024, at 10:42 AM, R15's fingernails and toenails were still long. R15 said he did want his nails cut, but the staff won't cut them for him. R15 said they cut his fingernails a long time ago. On August 15, 2024, at 10:47 AM, V20 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) said the CNAs were not allowed to cut the nails of residents who have diabetes but were allowed to clean his nails. On August 15, 2024, at 10:50 AM, V13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide meals that meet a resident's health care needs as ordered by the physician. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for diet orders in a sample size of 18. Findings include: R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include type 2 diabetes, depression, recurrent falls, arthritis, essential tremors, high cholesterol, hypertension, tachycardia, vitamin D deficiency, and depression. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/27/24 shows moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12. On 8/13/24 at 10:12 AM, R5 stated she is served too much starchy / carbohydrates and needs to eat more vegetables. R5 stated she is diabetic and that was not noted on her meal card. R5 stated that all residents get the same food items. R5 stated she informed the facility she was a diabetic during her admission to the facility. On 08/13/24 at 12:11 PM, R5's meal card had a blue dot and read…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to make efforts to resolve grievances. This applies to all 37 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The facility Census and Condition of residents form #672 dated 7/18/23 documents there are 37 residents residing in the facility. R24's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hypothyroidism, panic disorder, lack of coordination, major depressive disorder, and dissociative and conversion disorder. R24's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she has no cognitive impairment. R29's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include polyosteoarthritis, spinal stenosis, and depression. R29's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she has no cognitive impairment and is dependent on staff for all cares. On 7/20/23 at 11:06 AM, R29 said she has mentioned concerns in resident council and has received no follow up. R29 said clothing gets lost when it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food was being prepared and served in a sanitary environment. This applies to all 37 residents in the facility. The findings include: The Facility Census and Condition of Residents from the #672 dated 7/18/23 documents there are 37 residents residing in the facility. On 07/18/23 at 11:16 AM, a kitchen ceiling vent (2 x 3 feet) had a large amount of clumpy dust and debris adhered to it. The vent is centrally located in the kitchen. There was also dust and debris around the vent suspended from the ceiling. The hood in the kitchen had a layer of fuzzy dust on the panels at the top of the hood. On 7/19/23 at 12:05 PM the condition of the hood, vent, and ceiling remained the same. While serving the lunch meal, a tray of uncovered pieces of cake were directly under the dusty vent and ceiling. On 7/20/23 at 11:00 AM, the condition of the hood, vent, and ceiling remained the same. 07/20/23 12:16 PM, V7 (Dietary Manager) said, the vent and ceiling are too dirty, it's not sanitary. V7 said, he never noticed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the shower area was maintained in a safe and operational manner. This applies to all 37 residents in the facility. The findings include: The Facility Census and Condition of Residents from the #672 dated 7/18/23 documents there are 37 residents residing in the facility. On 7/20/23 at 11:06 AM, R29 said, she has mentioned concerns in resident council and has received no follow up. R29 said the shower rooms are badly in need repair. R29 said the floor in the small shower room on the 200 hallway [NAME] in and tiles are off the floor. The floor is uneven and when there is heavy equipment in there (shower chair) it is difficult to wheel around. R29 said for someone like me I might need a different style of shower chair than someone else. It is easy to tell that it is hard for the CNA's to move the shower chair around in there. 07/20/23 at 12:05 PM, the 200 hall shower room had a 1 x 1.5 foot area on the floor that was soft and spongy to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 resident (R37) reviewed for pressure outside the sample. The findings include: R37's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia, protein calorie malnutrition, peripheral vascular disease, Urinary Tract Infection, hypertension, and anemia. R37's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for all cares. R37's assessment for predicting pressure ulcer risk showed on 3/24/23 she was assessed to be high risk. This same document shows there was no pressure reducing mattress on R37's bed. This assessment showed the only pressure ulcer prevention intervention in place was a positioning device such as pillows or a cushion. R37's care plan initiated 4/5/23 showed, Pressure Ulcers . High risk for Pressure Ulcers . low body weight and protein deficiency . 4/23/23 Alternating air mattress,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred in a safe manner for 1 of 3 residents (R7) reviewed for safety in the sample of 12. The findings include: R7's face sheet printed on 7/20/23 showed diagnosis including but not limited to dementia, weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and history of falls. R7's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed severe cognitive impairment and extensive staff assistance needed for transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The same assessment showed R7 is incontinent of urine and bowel. On 7/18/23 at 10:17 AM and 12:07 PM, R7 was in bed asleep and lying on her left side in a fetal position. At 12:20 PM, R7 was observed in the dining room with V2 (Director of Nurses) attempting to feed her. R7 was sleepy and did not respond well to verbal cues to eat. At 12:45 PM, V4 (Certified Nurse Aide) stated R7 is a total assist today. Her abilities vary day to day, and she is super sleepy today. She hardly ate today…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care in a manner to prevent cross contamination for 1 of 1 resident (R7) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 12. The findings include: R7's face sheet printed on 7/20/23 showed diagnosis including but not limited to dementia, weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and history of falls. R7's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed severe cognitive impairment and extensive staff assistance needed for transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The same assessment showed R7 is incontinent of urine and bowel. On 7/20/23 at 9:18 AM, V4 (Certified Nurse Aide) gathered supplies and provided incontinence care to R7. V4 put on a pair of gloves and removed R7's wet incontinence brief. V4 used a soapy cloth to cleanse R7's groin area and buttock. V4 continued wearing the same gloves while drying R7. V4 wore the contaminated gloves to roll R7 from side to side and put on a fresh brief. V4 touched the bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 14E095. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next