Belvidere Health And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 61.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 51.2 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.89 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and implement prevention interventions for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pressure wounds in the sample of 3.The findings include: R2's Skin Impairment/Wound Evaluation dated 7/19/25 shows R2 has a Stage 2 Pressure Injury of his right buttock. R2's admission Record dated 9/30/25 shows R2's diagnoses include, but are not limited to, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and anemia. R2's current care plan provided by the facility does not show any skin alterations or wounds and no interventions to treat or prevent further wounds or worsening of existing wounds. R2's current Order Summary Report dated 9/30/25 shows an active order for dressings to the open area on R2's right buttock every other day and as needed. R2's Treatment Administration Records beginning 7/1/25 through 9/30/25 all show R2 has been receiving wound treatments beginning on 7/20/25 through 9/30/25 to his right buttock wound.On 9/30/25 at 10:09 AM, V6, Registered Nurse (RN), said R2 is back from his shower, and she is going to do…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 3. The findings include:R2's Skin Impairment/Wound Evaluation dated 7/19/25 shows R2 has a Stage 2 Pressure Injury of his right buttock. R2's admission Record dated 9/30/25 shows R2's diagnoses include, but are not limited to, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and anemia. R2's current Order Summary Report dated 9/30/25 shows an active order for dressings to the open area on R2's right buttock every other day and as needed. R2's Treatment Administration Records beginning 7/1/25 through 9/30/25 all show R2 has been receiving wound treatments beginning on 7/20/25 through 9/30/25 to his right buttock wound.R3's admission Record dated 9/30/25 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility's Pressure Ulcer Tracking log dated 9/30/25 shows R3 was identified as having a Stage 2 left buttock pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. R41's Physician Order Sheet dated 6/25 show R41 has diagnosis of cerebral infarction hemiplegia and hemiparesis following stroke affecting right side. On 6/24/25 at 8:45 AM, during the initial tour, R41 was in bed with his right contracted arm towards his chest, his right hand with closed tight fist. There was no device noted to R41's right hand. On 6/24/25 at 10:17 AM, R41 was in bed. There was no device noted to R41's right contracted hand. V3 (Registered Nurse) who was with this surveyor said R41 was admitted with contracted right hand and had not noticed the resident with a splint. On 6/25/25 at 8:53 AM, V7 (R41's Niece) during a family interview said her main concerns were R41 being in bed most of the time, his contracted right hand, and that she wants R41 to have exercises or therapy. On 6/25/25 at 1:25 PM, V5 Restorative Nurse said R41 does not have a splint for his contracted right hand. A splint helps to prevent further decline of the contracted hand. R41's last Restorative Assessment was 6/14/24. The facility has no formal restorative program, assessments were done…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify a change in condition in a timely manner. This applies to 1 of 16 residents (R23) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 16. The findings include: R23's face sheet shows she is a [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE]. Her face sheet lists her diagnoses to include: peripheral vascular disease, chronic heart failure, non-ST elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarction (heart attack), atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease stage 3, hypertension, and muscle weakness. R23's progress notes dated 6/21/25 at 2:58 PM shows, pt (patient) c/o (complained of) not feeling well, refused breakfast, and lunch. Drank 240cc (cubic centimeter) of fluids at lunch, nothing for breakfast. T99.3 (temperature) Tylenol given at 1230 (12:30 PM) c/o shortness of breath, sats (oxygen saturation) 89% on ra (room air), applied oxygen at 2 liters per n/c (nasal cannula). 1430 (2:30 PM (2 hours later)) reassessed by 2 nurses, abdominal breathing noted and heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident wasn't prescribed an unnecessary antibiotic. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R23) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 16. The findings include: R23's progress notes show: -6/12/25- a UA (urine analysis) was ordered and going to be picked up from the laboratory on 6/13/25. -6/13/25- V14 Nurse Practitioner (NP) aware of failed attempt to collect urine on day shift. Lab not here to collect . -6/14/25- urine was collected and awaiting pick up by laboratory. -6/15/25- urine culture noted to be in fridge called laboratory and spoke [to someone who] stated she doesn't understand why specimen was not picked up and now it needed to be entered as STAT (right now) -6/16/25- V14 NP notified that lab did not pickup urine, DON (V2- Director of Nursing) also notified Urine to be sent to another lab in AM per NP. -6/16/25 continue to show: R23's urine specimen was collected and ready for pick up by laboratory. -6/17/25, R23's progress notes show, Nursing manager and writer contacted daughter to update…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their antibiotic stewardship program to ensure residents weren't prescribed unnecessary antibiotics. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R23) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 16. The findings include: R23's electronic medical record (EMR) shows, she was prescribed a antibiotic for a presumed UTI (urinary tract infection). The facility attempted to get a urinanalysis done but the urine specimen was never picked up by the laboratory. R23 remained on the antibiotic without knowing whether she had a indication for it. On 6/24/25 at 1:50 PM during the infection control interview V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated, the nurses use the McGeer's (set of guidelines used to diagnose urinary tract infections (UTIs) in long-term care facilities) and a SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) to help when determining whether a resident needs a antibiotic or not. She also monitors residents on antibiotics. This is part of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. R23's EMR does not show…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident (R2) from abuse. This applies to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9. The findings include: R1's electronic face sheet printed on 10/2424 showed R1 has diagnoses including but not limited to altered mental status, psychosis, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 has mild cognitive impairment and experiences verbal behaviors directed towards others. R1's care plan dated 10/10/24 showed, (R1) demonstrates behavioral distress related to generalized anxiety disorder and adjustment disorder. Problems are manifested by exhibiting physical and verbal aggression. Triggers may include poor impulse control, not personally identifying the situation/environment; demonstrate mood lability, showing little ability to self-regulate anger/temper and mood state . R1's care plan dated 8/7/23 showed, (R1) has a behavior problem he asks staff for sexual favors,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient Certified Nursing Staffing from October through December of 2023. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The facility's document CMS form 671 dated 6/11/24 showed 53 residents residing in the facility. The facility's Facility assessment dated [DATE] showed under nursing services that the number of CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) on the evening shift should be 4. The facility's October 2023 CNA schedule showed on 10/7/23, 10/14/23, 10/15/23 10/21/23, 10/22/23, 10/28/23 and 10/29/23 there were 2.5 CNAs scheduled on the evening shift. The facility's November 2023 CNA schedule showed on 11/4/23, 11/12/23, 11/18/23, and 11/19/23 there were 2.5 CNAs scheduled on the evening shift and on 11/25/23 and 11/26/23 there were only 2 CNAs scheduled for the evening shift. The facility's December 2023 CNA schedule showed on 12/3/23, 12/9/23, 12/16/23, 12/17/23, ad 12/24/23 there were 2.5 CNAs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure multi-dose insulin pens were dated when opened and failed to dispose of an expired medication for 3 of 5 residents (R9, R22, R156) in the sample of 17 and 2 residents (R13, R33) out of the sample. The findings include: 1. R9's June 2024 order summary report showed an order start dated 4/16/24 for Basaglar Kwikpen (insulin) 30 units one time daily. R22's June 2024 order summary report showed an order start dated 3/25/24 for Fiasp Pen-Injector (insulin) four times a day per sliding scale. R156's June 2024 order summary report showed an order start dated 6/8/24 for Glargine Pen-Injector (insulin) 15 units in the morning. R13's June 2024 order summary report showed an order start dated 3/11/24 for Toujeo Pen-Injector (insulin) 15 units every 12 hours. R33's June 2024 order summary report showed an order start dated 3/2/23 for Lantus Pen-Injector (insulin) 40 units every 12 hours. On 6/12/24 at 7:53 AM, the 300-hall medication cart had five insulin pens in the top drawer. The pens were labeled with the names…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident had an order or care plan for advance directives for 1 of 1 residents (R156) reviewed for advance directives in the sample of 17. The findings include: R156's Facesheet printed 6/13/24 showed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include, but no limited to: left arm fracture, atrial fibrillation, stage 4 CKD (chronic kidney disease), diabetes, dementia, CHF (congestive heart failure), dysphagia, and depression. This document showed R1 was admitted for m a local hospital. The Advance Directive portion of this document was blank (no information was entered). R156's Progress Note dated 6/1/24 showed he was R1 was a Full Code. R156's Physician Order Sheets did not contain an order for Advance Directives. R156's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) did not contain a scanned POLST (Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment). R156's Care Plan did not have address Advance Directives prior to 6/13/24 (after surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $747K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL