Westminster Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 112 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 85% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 41.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.29 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.27 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide feeding assistance, implement nutritional recommendations, evaluate nutritional supplement intakes, notify the physician of significant weight loss, and ensure significant weight loss was evaluated by a dietitian for two (R5, R21) of two residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample list of 31. These failures resulted in R5 experiencing a severe weight loss of 16.65% (percent) in six months and R21 experiencing a 15.6% severe weight loss in two months. Findings include: The facility's Nutrition (Impaired)/Unplanned Weight Loss- Clinical Protocol dated September 2017 documents the physician will be notified of significant weight loss including persistent changes in baseline appetite/food intake, and the physician will help identify medical conditions that may cause the weight change and will consider if any additional diagnostic testing is indicated. This policy documents the staff and physician will identify and implement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to utilize the safest assistive devices for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for falls in a sample list of three residents. This failure resulted in (R1) slipping from a sit to stand lift and sustaining a dislocated shoulder requiring closed reduction. Findings Include: 1. R1's Care Plan updated 3/5/24 includes the following diagnoses: Fall, Chronic kidney Disease Type III, Congestive Heart Failure, Muscle Weakness, Difficulty Walking, Unsteadiness on Feet, Abnormal Gait, Lack of Coordination, and Abnormal Postures. This Care Plan documents R1 is High Risk for Falls. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 is moderately cognitively impaired, has functional limitations to all four extremities, uses a manual wheelchair and is totally dependent to roll wheelchair 150 Feet. This MDS also documents R1 is dependent for Sit to Stand, Toilet Transfer, and Toilet hygiene. R1's Care Profile Audit Report printed 3/26/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-29 · tag F0577 — widespread
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post notice of the availability of state agency survey results. This failure has the potential to affect all 43 residents in the facility.Findings include:On 5/27/26 at 10:05 a.m., during the resident council meeting, residents stated they were unaware of where the state agency survey results were located.On 5/28/26 at 9:15 a.m., the facility's survey results were in a file bin attached to the wall in a hallway containing staff offices. There was not a notice to designate the location of the survey results files.On 5/28/26 at 10:42 a.m., V1 Administrator confirmed there is no posting alerting residents and/or the public where to locate survey results. The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 5/26/26 documents 43 residents reside in the facility.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-29 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the daily staffing data in a prominent location that is accessible to residents, staff, and visitors. This failure has the potential to affect all 43 residents in the facility.Findings include:On 5/27/26 at 3:05 p.m., and on 5/28/26 at 8:59 a.m., this surveyor was unable to locate the daily staffing data posted anywhere in the facility.On 5/28/26 at 9:09 a.m., V2 Director of Nursing stated the daily staffing data is posted in a hard plastic holder on unit C/D nurses' station.On 5/28/26 at 9:12 a.m., V11 Registered Nurse was at the C/D nurses' station and stated the daily staffing data is usually in a plastic holder setting on the nurses' station counter. At this time, V11 located the daily staffing data sheet on a clipboard, behind the nurses' station underneath the daily assignment sheets. V11 stated, I think it [plastic holder] broke. We will have to get a new one.The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 5/26/26 documents 43 residents reside in the facility.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Failures at this level required more than one deficient practice statement. A. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the hot water supply in resident bathrooms and showers in safe operating temperatures. This failure affects seven residents (R3, R11, R13, R36, R47, R48, and R52) out of eleven reviewed for water temperatures on the sample list of 25. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of three residents (R8) reviewed for wandering on the sample list of 25. Findings include: a. On 05/26/26 at 12:45 PM, while checking a random sample of the water temperatures in resident bathroom hand sinks utilizing an Illinois Department of Public Health digital automatically calibrating thermometer, the hand sink water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 120.9 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The water temperature in the hand sink in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 123.0 F. The hand sink water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 116.9…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect resident's rights to be free from resident to resident physical abuse. This failure affects two of three residents (R8, R9) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of 25. Findings Include: The facility's Abuse Prevention, Reporting, and Investigation Policy revised May 2026 documents the facility prohibits and is committed to preventing abuse involving any resident. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, rough handling or unnecessary force. It is any intentional physical action that causes or could cause harm. R8's Care Plan dated 5/7/26 documents R8 is diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease. R8 forgets safety concerns and will walk in his room and hallway without assistance. R8 has a history of wandering. R8's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R8 is severely cognitively impaired. R8 has physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others such as hitting, kicking, pushing, and grabbing. These…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse to the State Survey Agency. This failure affects two of three residents (R8, R9) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of 25. Findings Include: The facility's Abuse Prevention, Reporting, and Investigation Policy revised May 2026 documents the facility prohibits and is committed to preventing abuse involving any resident. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, rough handling or unnecessary force. It is any intentional physical action that causes or could cause harm. Allegations involving abuse must be reported to the state surveying agency and other required authorities no later than four hours after the allegation is made known. Investigation results must be reported to the agency within five working days in accordance with federal long-term care requirements. R8's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R8 is severely cognitively impaired. R8's Behavior Note dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered daily weights were obtained and documented for two (R1 and R4) of the four residents reviewed for edema in a total sample of 10 residents.Findings include:1. R4's Progress note, dated 2/28/2026, documents that R4 discharged from the facility on 2/28/26. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R4 had an active diagnosis of heart failure.R4's Physician Order Summary Report, dated 2/20/2026, documents an order for a daily weight related to history of congestive heart failure (CHF).R4's Medication Administration Record, dated February 2026, documents that no weights were obtained or documented on 2/20/2026, 2/22/2026, 2/23/2026, and 2/24/2026.R4's nursing note, dated 2/28/2026, documented that R4 was observed with an increase in shortness of breath and increased swelling. It also documented that R4 was transferred to the hospital on this date.R4's undated Weight Summary documents that R4's weight on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff wore the required personal protective equipment for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 3.The findings include:R4's Order Summary Report dated 3/31/26 showed an order for enhanced barrier precautions for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). The order had a start date of 3/26/26.On 3/31/26 at 11:12 AM, there was an enhanced barrier precaution sign on R4's bathroom door. The sign indicated that staff must wear gloves and a gown with device care and use.On 3/31/26 at 11:12 AM, V16 (Registered Nurse) was in R4's room. V16 was handling R4's PICC. V16 had on gloves but no gown. V16 said she was disconnecting R4 from his antibiotic. On 3/31/26 at 12:47 PM, V7 (Infection Control Nurse) said enhanced barrier precautions are precautions to help limit infections. V7 said staff were to wear gloves and a gown when handling a PICC. The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions Protocol policy with a revised date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2025-06-10 · tag F0620 — widespread
  Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the admissions contract did not waive potential facility liability for losses of residents' personal property. This failure affects all 42 residents in the facility. Findings include: The admission contract folder, provided by V1 Administrator, and reviewed on 6/9/25, included the following: The facility's Skilled Care Establishment Contract Summary documents (the facility) is not responsible for loss of property belonging to Resident due to theft or any other cause unless such loss is caused by the negligent or intentional acts of (the facility) or its employees or agents. The welcome letter with bullet points of condensed information from the contract summary, documents Should your resident's items be lost, please contact Social Services in order to make a report. (The facility) are not responsible for lost or damaged items. On 6/09/25 at 1:40 PM V1 Administrator stated lost or damaged items are replaced by the facility on a case by case basis. V1 stated items can be lost in a person's home and the facility is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent further potential abuse by failing to remove an alleged perpetrator (V7 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)) from resident care. This failure affects eight (R140, R4, R35, R22, R142, R141, R18, R31) of eight residents reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 32. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Policy dated June 2024 documents If the instance, suspicion, or allegation involves a staff member, the staff member may be suspended, or re-assigned to a duty with no resident contact, pending the conclusion and results of the investigation. On 6/08/25 at 9:30 AM R140's right arm was in a sling and right lower leg/foot was in an orthotic boot. R140 stated R140 prefers not to have male caregivers, and the day after R140 admitted to the facility V7 CNA gave R140 a lecture on why R140 shouldn't be concerned with having male givers. R140 stated V7 said V7 didn't understand why women R140's age don't want male caregivers, since women have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document a root cause or obtain witness statements for fall investigations for four residents (R8,R17,R25,R35) of four residents reviewed for falls in a sample list of 32 residents. Findings include: 1. R8's progress note dated 04/24/2025 at 6:46AM documents (R8) called and when CNA answer call light found him on floor bedside bed with blood on tray table and floor from apparent nose bleed. ROM within normal limited. Orient to person, time and situation but did not know where he was. Pupils equal but no reaction to light. Assisted up by three people, gait belt and walker. After getting him to bed wanted to know why cowboys went outside the window. (R8) had abrasions on nose, chin and right knee and skin tears to both hands. Areas cleaned and steri strips applied to both hands. TPR (Temperature, Pulse, Respirations) 98.9,80,18 and BP (Blood Pressure) 149/66. Accucheck (blood glucose) 233. Sent to ER (Emergency Room) per 911. Phone with (R8). The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$12,149 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $12,149 — penalty dated 2024-03-26
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-24 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL