Westminster Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 112 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 41.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.29 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.45 to 0.87 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide feeding assistance, implement nutritional recommendations, evaluate nutritional supplement intakes, notify the physician of significant weight loss, and ensure significant weight loss was evaluated by a dietitian for two (R5, R21) of two residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample list of 31. These failures resulted in R5 experiencing a severe weight loss of 16.65% (percent) in six months and R21 experiencing a 15.6% severe weight loss in two months. Findings include: The facility's Nutrition (Impaired)/Unplanned Weight Loss- Clinical Protocol dated September 2017 documents the physician will be notified of significant weight loss including persistent changes in baseline appetite/food intake, and the physician will help identify medical conditions that may cause the weight change and will consider if any additional diagnostic testing is indicated. This policy documents the staff and physician will identify and implement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to utilize the safest assistive devices for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for falls in a sample list of three residents. This failure resulted in (R1) slipping from a sit to stand lift and sustaining a dislocated shoulder requiring closed reduction. Findings Include: 1. R1's Care Plan updated 3/5/24 includes the following diagnoses: Fall, Chronic kidney Disease Type III, Congestive Heart Failure, Muscle Weakness, Difficulty Walking, Unsteadiness on Feet, Abnormal Gait, Lack of Coordination, and Abnormal Postures. This Care Plan documents R1 is High Risk for Falls. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 is moderately cognitively impaired, has functional limitations to all four extremities, uses a manual wheelchair and is totally dependent to roll wheelchair 150 Feet. This MDS also documents R1 is dependent for Sit to Stand, Toilet Transfer, and Toilet hygiene. R1's Care Profile Audit Report printed 3/26/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Failures at this level required more than one deficient practice statement. A. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the hot water supply in resident bathrooms and showers in safe operating temperatures. This failure affects seven residents (R3, R11, R13, R36, R47, R48, and R52) out of eleven reviewed for water temperatures on the sample list of 25. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of three residents (R8) reviewed for wandering on the sample list of 25. Findings include: a. On 05/26/26 at 12:45 PM, while checking a random sample of the water temperatures in resident bathroom hand sinks utilizing an Illinois Department of Public Health digital automatically calibrating thermometer, the hand sink water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 120.9 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The water temperature in the hand sink in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 123.0 F. The hand sink water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was 116.9…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect resident's rights to be free from resident to resident physical abuse. This failure affects two of three residents (R8, R9) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of 25. Findings Include: The facility's Abuse Prevention, Reporting, and Investigation Policy revised May 2026 documents the facility prohibits and is committed to preventing abuse involving any resident. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, rough handling or unnecessary force. It is any intentional physical action that causes or could cause harm. R8's Care Plan dated 5/7/26 documents R8 is diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease. R8 forgets safety concerns and will walk in his room and hallway without assistance. R8 has a history of wandering. R8's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R8 is severely cognitively impaired. R8 has physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others such as hitting, kicking, pushing, and grabbing. These…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered daily weights were obtained and documented for two (R1 and R4) of the four residents reviewed for edema in a total sample of 10 residents.Findings include:1. R4's Progress note, dated 2/28/2026, documents that R4 discharged from the facility on 2/28/26. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R4 had an active diagnosis of heart failure.R4's Physician Order Summary Report, dated 2/20/2026, documents an order for a daily weight related to history of congestive heart failure (CHF).R4's Medication Administration Record, dated February 2026, documents that no weights were obtained or documented on 2/20/2026, 2/22/2026, 2/23/2026, and 2/24/2026.R4's nursing note, dated 2/28/2026, documented that R4 was observed with an increase in shortness of breath and increased swelling. It also documented that R4 was transferred to the hospital on this date.R4's undated Weight Summary documents that R4's weight on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff wore the required personal protective equipment for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 3.The findings include:R4's Order Summary Report dated 3/31/26 showed an order for enhanced barrier precautions for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). The order had a start date of 3/26/26.On 3/31/26 at 11:12 AM, there was an enhanced barrier precaution sign on R4's bathroom door. The sign indicated that staff must wear gloves and a gown with device care and use.On 3/31/26 at 11:12 AM, V16 (Registered Nurse) was in R4's room. V16 was handling R4's PICC. V16 had on gloves but no gown. V16 said she was disconnecting R4 from his antibiotic. On 3/31/26 at 12:47 PM, V7 (Infection Control Nurse) said enhanced barrier precautions are precautions to help limit infections. V7 said staff were to wear gloves and a gown when handling a PICC. The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions Protocol policy with a revised date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to label opened prepared foods with the date and time in the refrigerator. This failure has the potential to affect all 90 residents who reside in the facility. Findings Include: The facility's midnight census as of 4/8/24 is documented as 90. On 4/08/24 at 9:00AM, [NAME] slaw, whipped topping, and sour cream were observed in the refrigerator not labeled with a date or the time in which they were opened. At this same time, (V21), Dietary Manager stated I can't say how long these items have been in the refrigerator since they are not labeled. I will discard them. Food items should definitely be labeled with the date and time opened before being placed in the refrigerator.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain orders for oxygen, failed to store, change, and label oxygen and nebulizer tubing in accordance with facility policy (R16, R19, R26) and failed to provide routine cleaning of a humidifier (R15). R15, R16, R19, R26 are four of five residents reviewed for respiratory care in the sample list of 31. Findings include: 1.) On 04/08/24 at 11:18 AM there was a humidifier on the table in R15's room. R15 stated R15 was unsure what the machine is used for. There is no documentation in R15's medical record that R15 uses a humidifier or routine cleaning/care of the humidifier. On 4/08/24 at 1:51 PM V13 Registered Nurse confirmed R15's humidifier and stated V13 is unsure how often it is used. V13 stated R15's family brought in the humidifier and provides care/maintenance for the machine. On 4/09/24 at 12:53 PM V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated V2 provides a list of humidifiers to housekeeping staff to clean monthly. V2 stated V2 was unaware…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This failure affects five (R31, R97, R149, R150, R33) of five residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions in the sample list of 31. Findings include: 1.) On 4/09/24 at 1:26 PM V11 and V15 Certified Nursing Assistants entered R31's room and provided urinary catheter care. V11 and V15 did not wear gowns during R31's care and there was no signage posted on R31's door to indicate enahanced barrier precautions (EBP) use when providing R31's cares. R31's Care Plan dated 2/19/24 documents antibiotics were ordered to treat a Urinary Tract Infection. This Care Plan documents R31 has an indwelling urinary catheter due to urinary retention and includes interventions for contact isolation due to colonization of MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (multidrug resistant organism). On 4/10/24 at 2:30 PM V2 Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist stated the facility does not have a policy for EBP…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess for the ability to self administer medications for three (R37, R97, R101) of three residents reviewed for self administration of medication in the sample list of 31. Findings include: 1.) On 4/08/24 at 10:04 AM there were bottles of saline nasal spray and artificial tears at R37's bedside and in R37's bathroom. R37's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R37 has moderate cognitive impairment. R37's Order Summary dated 4/9/24 does not include orders for saline nasal spray or artificial tears. R37's medical record does not document orders to self administer medications or that medications may be kept at the bedside. There is no assessment of R37's ability to self administer medications. 2.) On 4/08/24 at 10:24 AM there were two tubes of Diclofenac (topical pain reliever) 1% on R97's night stand. R97 stated R97 was unsure about the medication use. 4/9/24 at 11:31 AM the Diclofenac tubes were on R97's night stand. R97's Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for one (R16) of three residents reviewed for accidents in the sample list of 31. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Policy dated June 2023 documents allegations or suspicions of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of resident property, or injuries of unknown origin will be reported to the facility's Administrator, Director of Nursing, or other designated staff. This policy documents injuries are considered of unknown source when the source of the injury was not observed or could not be explained by the resident and is suspicious due to the extent or location of the injury or number of injuries at one time or over time. This policy documents injuries of unknown source will be investigated within two hours of receipt of notification and the results of the investigation will be reported to the Illinois Department of Public Health within five days. R16's Nursing Note dated 3/14/2024 at 6:32 AM documents R16 fell and required the use of a full mechanical lift to transfer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to conduct careplan meetings for one of one residents (R21) reviewed for careplan meetings in the sample list of 31. Findings include: On 4/08/24 at 12:41 PM R21 stated the facility does not have care plan meetings with R21 or R21's family. R21's medical record documents she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and Minimum Data Sets were completed on 12/18/23 and 2/16/24. On 4/09/24 at 10:25 AM, V8 Social Services Director (SSD) stated R21 last had a care plan meeting on 12/28/23 and residents have a care plan meeting every quarter. On 4/9/24 at 11:30 AM, V9 Assistant SSD stated V8 was still working on getting R21's care plan information and R21's care plan meeting was scheduled today for 4/11/24. On 4/9/24 at 2:35 PM, V10 Minimum Data Set (MDS)/Care Plan Coordinator stated R21 has not had a careplan meeting since 12/28/23 and V10 follows the MDS schedule to set up care plan meetings every 90 days. V10 stated V10 has 95 residents to keep track of and it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,149 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $12,149 — penalty dated 2024-03-26
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-24 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL