Sunset Rehabilitation and Health Care
129 South 1st Avenue, Canton, IL 61520 · For profit - Corporation · 115 certified beds · (309) 647-4327 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609, F0610) — most recent Aug 2025
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $518,295 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-16)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.8% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 56.7% | 54.2% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.7% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.4% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 36.8% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.9% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.2% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.6% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 20.0% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.48 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.06 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 75.7 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-05 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to formulate Advanced Directives on admission and document current Advanced Directives within the care plan and within the physician's order sheets for five of six residents (R1, R3, R5, R9, and R10) reviewed for advanced directives in the sample of 13. These failures resulted in facility staff failing to provide CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) to a resident (R1) with no Advanced Directive, who was found unresponsive in his room. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed on 8-2-24, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of their removal plan and Quality Assurance monitoring. Findings include: The facility's Advance Directives Policy, dated 8-9-22, documents, Purpose: To provide guidance to staff on the expectation of respecting wishes with regards to Advance Directives and compliance with state and federal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident (R1); and failed to prevent resident-to-resident sexual and physical abuse for six of six residents (R1, R2, R5, R6, R10, and R11) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 50. These failures resulted in R1, a resident with a history of sexual aggression, sexually assaulting (R2, R5, and R11) on multiple occasions, R1 sexually groping a resident (R10), and R1 physically assaulting a resident (R6). These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed on 7-14-24, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of their Removal plan and Quality Assurance monitoring. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy, dated 11-28-16, documents, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation as defined…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their Abuse policies and procedures to identify and report resident-to-resident suspected crimes and abuse immediately to the local law enforcement, the Administrator, the residents' representatives, and the State Agency for six of six residents (R1, R2, R5, R6, R10, and R11) reviewed for reporting of abuse in the sample of 50. These failures resulted in these residents being subjected to further criminal sexual and physical assault from the perpetrator (R1). These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed on 7-14-24, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of their Removal plan and Quality Assurance monitoring. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy, dated 11-28-16, documents, Sexual Abuse is the non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. Sexual Abuse the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement their Abuse policies and procedures to thoroughly investigate all alleged violation of abuse, failed to prevent further abuse from occurring while the investigation was in progress, failed to implement measures to provide safety and supervision to prevent further abuse, and failed to submit a final report of the investigation report to the State Agency within five working days for six of six residents (R1, R2, R5, R6, R10, and R11) reviewed for protection from abuse in the sample of 50. These failures resulted in R1 having continual unsupervised access to the residents on two hallways and the dining rooms to where R1 has resided (R2-R10 and R12-R50) after R1 had sexually and physically assaulted R2, R5, R6, R10 and R11 on multiple occasions. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed on 7-14-24, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as additional time is needed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to protect one resident (R6) from ongoing sexual abuse by two staff members, for one of three residents reviewed for sexual abuse. This failure resulted in R6 discharging from the Facility, relapsing on drugs, and requiring admission to an in-patient treatment center. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 9/5/23, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity level two. Additional time is needed to monitor the effectiveness of the implementation of protocols and oversight visits. Findings include: Facility Abuse Prevention Program Policy, revised 11/28/16, documents: the Facility affirms the right of our Residents to be free from abuse as defined below; this Facility therefore prohibits mistreatment or abuse of its Residents, and has attempted to establish a Resident sensitive and resident secure environment; the purpose of this policy is assure that the Facility is doing all within its control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident while handling a hot beverage and failed to have a policy regarding the use and supervision of hot beverages for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for accidents in the sample of three. These failures resulted in R1 sustaining a burn to the right thigh after spilling a hot beverage in his lap.This past noncompliance occurred on October 20, 2025 and was corrected the same day.Findings include: R1's admission Record documents R1's date of admission to the facility was 10/21/18, and his diagnoses on admission include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Seizures, Personal History of Transient Ischemic Attack, and Cerebral Infarction without Residual Deficits, and Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, or Anxiety. R1's Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 9/5/25, documents R1 has moderately impaired cognition, requires a manual wheelchair for mobility, and is dependent with bathing, grooming, transfers, and mobility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to perform pressure ulcer risk assessments as directed by the facility's policy, failed to perform daily skin checks, failed to develop and implement pressure relieving interventions, failed to develop a pressure ulcer care plan, failed to assess a pressure ulcer weekly, and failed to perform pressure ulcer treatments as directed by the physician for one of two residents (R7) reviewed for pressure ulcer development in the sample of 13. These failures resulted in R7's right and left heel pressure ulcers deteriorating from stage one pressure ulcers to an unstageable pressure ulcer to the right heel and a stage three pressure ulcer to the left heel. Findings include: The facility's Preventative Skin Care policy, dated 01/2018, documents, It is the facility's policy to provide preventative skin care through repositioning and careful washing, rinsing, drying and observation of the resident's skin condition to keep them clean, comfortable, well groomed, and free from pressure ulcers. Procedures: 1. All residents will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement pressure relieving interventions, failed to develop a pressure relieving care plan after being assessed as high risk for pressure ulcer development, and failed to immediately develop a pressure ulcer care plan once a pressure ulcer developed for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for facility acquired pressure ulcers in the sample of three. These failures resulted in R1 developing an unstageable, painful, deep tissue pressure ulcer to the left heel, after R1 had a decline in ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) following a left hip fracture. Findings include: The facility's Pressure Sore Prevention Guidelines policy, dated 01/2018, documents, Policy: It is the facility's policy to provide adequate interventions for the prevention of pressure ulcers for residents who are identified as high or moderate risk for skin breakdown as determined by the Braden Scale (assessment for predicting pressure ulcer risk). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow therapeutic diet orders for one resident (R1) of 4 reviewed for therapeutic diets in a total sample of eight. Therapeutic Diet Policy, dated 12/2024, documents, Therapeutic diets shall be prescribed by the Attending Physician. The admission Policy, dated 12/2024, documents Prior to or at the time of admission, the resident's Attending Physician must provide the facility with information needed for the immediate care of the resident, including orders covering at least Type of diet. R1's Electronic Health Record documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Diabetes Mellitus, Dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Hypertension. R1's Hospital Discharge orders, dated 4/20/26, documents R1's diet order as Carbohydrate Controlled Diet. R1's Physician's Order in the Electronic Health Record, dated 4/20/26, documents R1's diet order as Regular diet. R1's Physician's Order, dated 5/5/26, documents R1's diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-06 · tag F0555 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative when the facility changed a resident's primary physician choice for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for Resident Rights in the sample of eightFindings include:The facility's Resident Rights Policy, dated 12/24, documents, Each resident will have autonomy and choice, to the maximum extent possible, about how each resident wishes to live his/her everyday life and receipt of care, subject to the community's policies and procedures as long as those policies so not violate any requirement. Resident rights include but are not limited to: Choose a physician and treatment and participate in decisions and care planning.R1's admission Orders, dated 4/2/24, document V11 (Physician) was R1's Primary Care Physician on admission.R1's Electronic Health Record documents the facility switched R1's Primary Care Physician from V11 to V12 (Medical Director) in May 2025 (unknown day). R1's Electronic Health Record documents V12 continued to provide orders and/or physician visits in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide post-fall assessments, identify injury, and thoroughly investigate incidents to identify the root cause and implement interventions to potentially prevent further events per policy for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for falls in a sample of 6.Findings include:The Skilled Nurse Facility Post Fall Workflow policy, dated 5/2025, documents after a resident falls, they must be stabilized by the nursing staff. If the fall was unwitnessed, no matter their orientation status, the neuro (neurological) policy must be followed and completed. Staff must complete root cause analysis to determine why the resident fell and an appropriate immediate intervention must be placed and updated on the resident's care plan. The resident provider and representative must be notified of the resident's fall. A Fall Risk Assessment must be completed. A detailed Progress Note must be documented in the resident's record, including root cause analysis, resident provider…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Administrator for one resident (R2) of three residents reviewed for abuse in a total sample of three.FINDINGS INCLUDE:The facility policy, entitled ABUSE, PREVENTION AND PROHIBITION POLICY, not dated, documents: The facility employee or agent, who becomes aware of abuse or neglect, including injuries of unknown origin or alleged misappropriation of resident property, shall immediately report the matter to the facility Administrator or his/her designated representative in the Administrators absence; and the facility Administrator will ensure a thorough investigation of alleged violations of individual rights and document appropriate action.R2's Electronic Medical Record/EMR Progress Notes documents on 6/28/25 at 8:44 AM, R2 had someone call V5/Registered Nurse to report CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) hurt R2.On 8/8/25, at 12:00 p.m., V5/Registered Nurse confirmed her progress note dated 6/28/25 at 8:44 a.m.; R2 told V5 that V7 Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA and V8/CNA hurt her with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse thoroughly for one (R1) of one residents reviewed for physical abuse in a sample of seven. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition, dated 03/2025, documents, Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals. This facility prohibits mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of residents. This also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This presumes that all instances of abuse, even those residents in a coma, can cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform ongoing clinical assessments for a resident experiencing an acute medical condition (R1); one of four residents reviewed for clinical assessment, in a sample of four. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The (undated) facility policy, Nursing Documentation Guidelines directs staff, Three-day documentation on every shift is required on all new admissions/readmissions. R1's hospital Discharge Summary form, dated 02/05/2025 documents, admit date : [DATE]. Past medical history of COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Asthma, Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease presents to the ED (Emergency Department) with 1 to 2 days of decreased appetite, shortness of breath and wheezing. (R1) did test positive for Influenza A. On admission (R1) continued to be mostly nonverbal however did attempt to speak with family and speech was very garbled. (R1) does have slight right sided upper extremity weakness and significant right lower extremity weakness. Head CT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct textured diet to one of four residents (R1), a resident with a documented diagnosis of dysphasia, in a sample of four. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The (undated) facility policy, Therapeutic and Mechanically Altered Diets, directs staff, It is the policy of (facility) that therapeutic and mechanically altered diets are ordered by the physician and planned by the dietician. A therapeutic diet is a diet ordered to manage problematic health conditions. A mechanically altered diet is a diet specifically prepared to alter the consistency of food in order to facilitate oral intake. Examples include soft diets, pureed foods and ground meat. Diets for residents that only take liquids that have been thickened are included in this definition. A physician's order is written for all diets including therapeutic and mechanically altered diets. R1's hospital Discharge Summary form, dated 02/05/2025, documents, admit date : [DATE]. Past medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep a clean and sanitary kitchen; dispose of outdated food; date and label opened food items; include thaw dates for supplements; correctly cool down potentially hazardous food and keep a log of the temperatures; and label and date food storage containers holding bulk food stuffs.This has the potential to affect all 75 residents living in the facility. Findings: 1. The document Kitchen Sanitation, dated 10/2020, states, It is the policy of this facility to comply with public health standards and local and state sanitation regulations. The Food Service Manager will monitor sanitation of the Dietary Department on a daily basis. The Dietary Sanitation Quality Assurance Review shall be used as a tool to monitor compliance with sanitation standards and identify which areas need corrective action. The Food Service Manager will develop a cleaning schedule for the department and ensure that dietary employees complete cleaning tasks as scheduled.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a residents Physician Orders matched their Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) code status for one of 24 residents (R66) reviewed for Advanced Directives in the sample of 37. Findings include: The facility's DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) Policy, dated [DATE], documents, Purpose: To offer facility guidance on do not resuscitate orders. Policy: Our facility will not use cardiopulmonary resuscitation and related emergency measure to maintain life functions on a resident when there is DNR Order in effect. Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Do not resuscitate orders on the physician's order sheet maintained in the resident's medical record. 2. A DNR order form must be completed and signed by the Attending Physician and resident (or resident's legal surrogate, as permitted by State Law). R66's Physician Orders, dated 11/2024, documents Code Status: [DATE]- Full Code. R66's Illinois Department…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a dietician's recommendation for weight loss, provide a resident with a physician ordered calorie supplement, implement a care plan for weight loss and complete physician ordered weekly weights for two of four residents (R43, R66) reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 37. Findings include: The facility's Weight Assessment and Intervention Policy, dated 7/1/2023, documents Policy statement: The multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for our residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Weight Assessment- 1. The nursing staff will measure residents' weights on admission, and weekly for four weeks thereafter. If no weight concerns are noted at this point, weights will be measured monthly thereafter. 2. Weights will be recorded in the resident's medical record. 5. Any weight change of five percent or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date oxygen tubing, place an oxygen sign on resident doors, and ensure a nebulizer facemask and tubing was changed weekly for three of three residents (R5, R34, R56) reviewed for oxygen therapy in the sample of 37. Findings include: The Oxygen Administration Policy revised 3/17/22, documents, To administer oxygen to the resident when insufficient oxygen is being carried by the blood to the tissues. Oxygen therapy will be administered to the resident upon the written order of a licensed physician or may be given in an emergent life-sustaining situation without an order, until an order may be obtained by a licensed physician. It will be administered by way of an oxygen mask, nasal cannula and/or a nasal catheter. Procedure: 5. Place the Oxygen in Use sign on the outside of the room entrance door. Tubing will be changed and dated weekly. 1. R5's admission Record documents R5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Morbid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) of Olanzapine (Antipsychotic medication) for one of three residents (R34) reviewed for antipsychotic medications in the sample of 37. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Policy, dated 11/28/17, documents, It is the policy of this facility that residents shall not be given unnecessary drugs. Unnecessary drug is any drug used: For excessive duration. Residents who use antipsychotic drugs shall receive gradual dose reductions and behavior interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue the drugs. Any resident receiving psychotropic medications will be reviewed at a minimum of every quarter by the interdisciplinary team. Reductions shall be attempted at least twice in one year, unless the physician documents the need to maintain the resident regimen according to the regulatory guidelines for such. The facility's Reduction of Psychotropic Medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene while providing incontinent care and implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with an open wound, for two of 18 residents (R5, R56) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 37. Findings include: The Incontinence Care Policy, dated 7/1/23, documents, To provide guidelines to all nursing staff for providing proper incontinence care in order to clean skin clean, dry, free of irritation and odor. All incontinent residents will receive incontinence care in order to keep skin clean, dry and free of irritation and/or odor. Incontinence care will be provided as required. 8. Wash all soiled skin areas and dry very well, especially between skin folds; changing gloves and performing hand hygiene as required to prevent cross-contamination. The Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 7/13/23, documents, Purpose: To reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms/MDRO (Multi-Drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to keep a urinary catheter insertion site clean every shift for one of one resident (R7) reviewed for urinary catheter care in the sample of 13. Findings include: The facility's Indwelling Catheter Care policy, dated 10-7-22, documents, Purpose: To provide guidance to facility staff on the care of residents with an indwelling foley catheter within the facility to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. The facility shall maintain and care for foley catheters per the facility, following physician orders and adhering to facility infection control and best nursing practice standards. R7's Care Plan, dated 7-22-24, documents, Goal: The resident will show no signs and symptoms of urinary infection through the review dated 8-12-24. (Provide) catheter care every shift. R7's Treatment Administration Records (TARs), dated 5-16-24 through 7-31-24, document, Provide (indwelling urinary) catheter care every shift. These same TARs, dated 5-16-24 through 7-31-24, document R7 did not receive indwelling urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain scheduled IV (Intravenous) antibiotics from the pharmacy for one of three residents (R8) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 13. Findings include: R8's Physician's Order, dated 7-15-24, documents, Start Primaxin 500 mg (milligrams) IV (Intravenous) every six hours for the diagnosis of UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). R8's Medication Administration Records, dated 7-18-24 through 7-26-24, document R8's scheduled Primaxin 500 mg IV was not administered on 7-23-24 at 2:00 AM, 7-23-24 at 8:00 AM, or 7-23-24 at 2:00 PM. On 7-27-24 at 10:00 AM, R8 stated, I missed several doses of my IV antibiotic. I am not sure why. All I was told from the staff is they (facility) staff did not get the antibiotic delivered from the pharmacy. On 7-30-24 at 11:15 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated, The pharmacy messed up and did not send (R8's) IV antibiotics. I called (V17, Pharmacy Customer Service Representative) and let him know we did not have enough IV antibiotics to give (R8). (V17) told me the pharmacy had an internal issue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer a resident's physician ordered IV (Intravenous) antibiotic for one of three residents (R8) reviewed for medication errors in the sample of 13. Findings include: The facility's Medication Error Policy/Procedure, dated 7-16-23, documents, Purpose: To provide guidelines to staff regarding procedure for reporting and recording medication errors. Policy: A medication error shall be defined as any variation in administration of medication from the physicians' orders and/or facility policy. It is the responsibility of the nursing personnel to report and record any and all medication/treatment errors. It is the responsibility of nursing and/or designee to assure MD (Medical Doctor) and POA (Power of Attorney) are notified of all med (medication) errors. A details account of the incident must be recorded. Such documentation must include the time and date of the incident, the name, strength, and dosage of medication administered, the condition of the resident, any treatment administered, and the date and time that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent two residents with wandering behaviors (R8 and R38) from entering resident's room and infringing on resident's privacy for five of five residents (R3, R4, R9, R46, R47) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 50. Findings include: The facility's Residents' Rights policy, dated 11/2018, documents, Your facility must be safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. You have the right to privacy. R8's current Care Plan does not include a plan of care to address R8's wandering behaviors. R38's current Care Plan documents R38 has impaired cognition resulting in wandering behaviors related to Lewy Body Dementia. This same Care Plan documents R38's goal is to provide supervision, assistance, and redirection to prevent R38 from distracting others. On 7-10-24 at 9:40 AM, R3 was lying in bed with a cubicle curtain closed between him and his roommate (R9). R8 entered. R8 was in a wheelchair and self-propelled himself into R3 and R9's room, and then entered R3 and R9's bathroom. R8 was confused. R3 yelled at R3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure above the bed lighting was in working condition and room temperatures were kept at comfortable levels for two of three residents (R3 and R9) reviewed for a comfortable and homelike environment in the sample of 50. Findings include: The facility's Residents' Rights policy, dated 11/2018, documents, Your facility must be safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. On 7-10-24 at 9:40 AM, R3 was lying in bed with a cubicle curtain closed between him and his roommate (R9). R9 was confused. R9's above the bed light was on and the light was missing the pull string that was used to turn the light on and off. R3's above the bed light was also missing a pull string. R3's and R9's window was unlocked and slid down approximately one foot from the top allowing outside air into R3 and R9's room. R3 stated, I have been here in this room since the first (7-1-24). There is no way to turn the lights above my bed or my roommate's bed off or on because the strings are missing. I have not been able to sleep at night with these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meals to all the residents seated together at the same time, during meal time for one resident (R50), and failed to sit next to and allow a resident to eat independently for one resident (R48). This applies to 2 residents (R50 and R48) reviewed for meal service. Findings include: 1. The facility's Dining Room Procedures, revised 10/16, documents 6. Plates should be passed to all residents at one table at the same time. On 11/28/23 at 11:26 AM, R50 observed sitting at the dining room table when his tablemate received a meal tray. On 11/28/23 at 11:44 AM, V6, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and V7, CNA, observed putting dirty trays back into the food warmers and closing the doors. R50 observed still sitting at the dining room table without a meal tray. This surveyor approached V7 and asked if they were done serving all the residents. V7 stated, Yes, all the trays have been passed. V7 was then asked why R50 did not receive a meal tray. V7 stated, Oh! (opened the food warmer) They didn't send one down…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to give the appropriate notices for Medicare Part A for three (R23, R54 and R231) of three residents reviewed for Medical Part A Services in a sample of 34. Findings include: R54's Medical Part A skilled services start date was 10/4/23 and last covered day was 10/23/23. R54 was not given the Advanced Beneficiary Notice/ABN or the Notice of Medicare Non-coverage/NOMNC. R23's Medical Part A skilled services start date was 7/14/23 and last covered day was 8/4/23. R54 was not given the ABN or the NOMNC. R231's Medical Part A skilled services start date was 11/17/23 and last covered day was 11/21/23. R54 was not given the ABN or the NOMNC. On 12/01/23 at 10:00 AM, V1, Administrator, stated, We don't have the ABN or NOMNC notices for (R54, R23, or R231). Social Services is responsible for them, but he just started, and these were prior to him starting in that position. On 12/01/23 at 10:42 AM, V1 stated, (R231) went back to the other facility; (R23) met max potential; and (R54) refused visits. We did not send any notices to these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a new level II PASRR (Preadmision Screening and Resident Review) for a new diagnosis of serious mental illness for two residents (R27 and R50 ) out of four residents reviewed for PASRRs in a sample of 34. Findings include: 1. R50's medical record documents an admitting diagnosis of Dementia with behavioral disturbances, delusional disorder, and persistent mood affective disorder. R50s medical record, dated 11/13/23, documents a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. On 11/29/23 at 10:15 AM, V1, Administrator, verified R50 did not have a PASRR level II screening completed with the addition of his schizoaffective disorder, and stated, I don't know when the schizoaffective disorder was added. I know it was added after his admission because it's not on his admission paperwork. I didn't know they need to be re-screened for the the PASRR level II when they had a new diagnosis added. 2. The Face Sheet for R27 documents R27 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II (R22) and failed to obtain a new Level I Screening after expiration (R70) for two of four residents (R22 and R70) reviewed for PASARRs in the sample of 34. Findings include: 1. R22's Face Sheet documents R22's facility admission date as [DATE]. R22's Cumulative Diagnosis Log documents R22 with diagnoses to include but not limited to: Bipolar Disorder; Unspecified Psychosis; Depression; Panic Disorder; and Anxiety. R22's Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) I-Initial Screen, dated [DATE], documents the following: There is a reasonable basis for suspecting developmental disability or mental illness with (R22); (R22) has a history of severe recurrent major depression with psychotic features; and (R22) has a history of a psychotic hospitalization. This same OBRA screening documents a Level II screening was needed, and it was not completed at the time, due to R22 discharging from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan for one (R45) of 19 residents reviewed for Care planning in the sample of 34. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning policy and procedure, revised 7/20/22, documents, It is the policy of (The Facility) to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each Resident admitted to this facility. The results of the Resident assessment shall serve as the basis for determining each Resident's strengths, needs, goals, life history and preferences to develop a person centered comprehensive plan of care for each Resident that will described the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintaining the Resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Care Plan - Plan of care describing a need/problem, and indicating the approaches/interventions to be instituted to assist the Resident in maintaining/receiving care in relation to the need/problem. Program Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident transferred out of bed for one (R9) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living in a sample of 34. Findings include: The Facility Assessment, dated 4/18/23, states, The purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents. Using a competency-based approach focuses on ensuring that each resident is provided care that allows the resident to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The Reliant 600 RPL 600 User Manual, undated, documents, The weight limitation for the RPL600 is 600 pounds; troubleshooting- actuator fails to lift when button is pressed- boom actuator is in need of service, unit does not work properly and battery has been replaced and unit still does not work properly- check battery and replace if necessary, and contact mechanical lift facility for service. R9's MDS/Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a device in place to prevent skin breakdown and prevent further contraction of a left hand contracture for one resident (R8) out of two resident reviewed for range of motion in a sample of 34. Findings include: The facility's Splint/Appliances policy revised 9/08 documents, A resident who has a contracture, or has a likelihood of developing a contracture, caused by a physical condition and requires further evaluation will be assessed by the Occupational Therapist for a splint/appliance as ordered by the resident's physician. 6. The Occupational Therapist will provide nursing with a schedule for the application and removal of the splint, subject to physician order. 7. The program will be identified on the resident's care plan including the problem, approaches and goals. R8's Occupational Therapy Plan of Care, dated 10/29/21, documents, Patient will utilize hand roll or palm protector for left upper extremity to prevent skin break down and for contracture prevention. R8's Occupational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to screen and identify triggers for two of two residents (R45 and R62) reviewed for Trauma Informed Care in the sample of 34. Findings include: The facility's undated Trauma Informed Care policy and procedure documents the purpose, To ensure that all residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to climate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. Procedure: 1. Upon admission the Social Service Director (SSD) will review hospital discharge records and interview the resident or the resident's representative to determine any history of trauma. 2. The SSD will complete a Trauma Informed Care Screen to evaluate for any history of a traumatic experience that a resident may have had. The facility's undated Social Service Director Job Summary documents: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Physician/Prescriber response to the Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review/MRR for one of six residents (R22) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 34. Findings include: The facility's Medication Regimen Review Policy, dated January 2022, states, 6. The pharmacist will address copies of residents' MRRs to the Director of Nursing/DON and/or the attending physician and to the Medical Director. Facility staff should ensure that the attending physician, Medical Director, and Director of Nursing are provided with copies of the MRRs. 7. Facility should encourage Physician/Prescriber or other Responsible Parties receiving the MRR and the DON to act upon the recommendations contained in the MRR. 7.1 For those issues that require Physician/Prescriber intervention, facility should encourage Physician/Prescriber to either accept and act upon the recommendations contained within the MRR or reject all or some of the recommendations contained in the MRR and provide an explanation as to why the recommendation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify target behaviors and gain consent to warrant the use of antipsychotic medication for one resident (R50), and failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction for an antipsychotic medication for one resident (R22), out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 34. Findings include: 1. The facility's Psychotropic Medication policy, revised 11/28/17, documents, G. Use of Antipsychotic Drugs: 13. Antipsychotic's should not be used if one or more of the following is/are the only indication: a: Wandering. R50's medical record documents the following diagnosis: Dementia with agitation, delusional disorder, mood disorder and schizoaffective disorder. R50's Psychotropic Medication Consent -Antipsychotic, dated 8/13/20, documents, Medication: Seroquel. Medication dosage: 12.5 mg (milligrams) at bedtime. Medication used for these identified behaviors and diagnosis: Dementia and behavioral disturbances - exit seeking. R50's behavior tracking sheet, dated 11/2023, documents, Psychotropic Medication:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise Care Plans for three residents (R9, R27, and R45) of 19 residents reviewed for Care Planning in the sample of 34. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning (CPC) policy and procedure, revised 7/20/22, documents, It is the policy of (The Facility) to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each Resident admitted to this facility. The results of this Resident assessment shall serve as the basis for determining each Resident's strengths, needs, goals, life history and preferences to develop a person centered comprehensive plan of care for each Resident that will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintaining the Residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The CPC shall be reviewed after each Annual, Significant Change and Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) and revised as necessary to reflect the resident's current medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs by offering a menu balanced in protein and calories for a resident on a Vegetarian Diet. This has affected one (R9) of three residents in a sample of 32. Findings include: The document, Vegetarian Diet, dated 4/17, states, It is the policy of this facility to meet the nutritional needs and preferences of residents who do not eat meat or other animal products and provide a variety to the resident. The Facility Assessment, dated 4/18/23, states, The purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents. Using a competency-based approach focuses on ensuring that each resident is provided care that allows the resident to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Services offered by this facility (include) Individualized Dietary requirements, specialized diets, cultural or ethnic dietary needs. The Facility's Website states, Food and Nutrition Services - Our Facilities feature a Food and Nutrition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-29 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change in condition MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment within 14 days of a change in condition for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for a change in condition in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Assessment MDS policy, dated 11-1-2017, documents, The MDS shall be re-evaluated according to the following schedule. c. Significant Change in Status-The Interdisciplinary Team shall determine the presence or absence of significant change based on the resident's status during the previous assessment reference period compared with the current assessment reference period. Within 14 days of determination that a significant change in a resident's status: Is not self-limiting, impacts more than one area of the resident's health status and requires interdisciplinary review and/or care plan revision. R1's MDS Assessment, dated 9-5-23, documents R1 ambulated and transferred independently and had no pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide fingernail care and facial hair grooming for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) dependence in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Preventative Skin Care policy, dated 01/2018, documents, Keep the resident's fingernails and toenails short and smooth to prevent them from accidentally scratching themselves. R1's Care Plan dated 6-8-23 documents, Provide bathing, hygiene, dressing, and grooming per resident's preference as able. Keep facial hair trimmed-shaved per resident's usual style. Fingernail care on shower day and as needed. On 10-27-23 at 8:25 AM, R1 was sitting in a wheelchair in the hallway. All ten of R1's fingernails were long, jagged, and had brown debris under them. R1's mustache and beard were approximately a half an inch long. R1 stated, I want my fingernails to be trimmed and clean. They need it. They are dirty. I am not sure when they were cut last. I also do not like having hair on my face. I need to be shaved. On 10-27-23 at 8:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their Fall Prevention policy to immediately assess a resident after a fall, document a fall in the resident record, and develop fall interventions immediately after a fall for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls with injury in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention policy, dated 11-10-18, documents, Policy: To provide for resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls; decrease falls and still honor each resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence and mobility. 5. Immediately after any resident fall the unit nurse will assess the resident and provide any care or treatment needed for the resident. A fall huddle will be conducted with staff on duty to help identify circumstances of the event and appropriate interventions. The unit nurse will place documentation of the circumstances of a fall in the nurses notes and, on an AIM, (Acute Illness Management) for Wellness form along with any new intervention deemed to be appropriate at the time. R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespreadTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to report a sexual allegation of abuse for one (R6) of three Residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of three. This failure has the potential to affect all Residents 67 residing in the facility. Findings include: Facility Resident Census Roster, dated 8/28/23, documents 67 Residents residing in the Facility. Facility Abuse Prevention Program Policy, revised 11/28/16, documents: the Facility affirms the right of our Residents to be free from abuse as defined below; this Facility therefore prohibits mistreatment or abuse of its Residents, and has attempted to establish a Resident sensitive and resident secure environment; the purpose of this policy is assure that the Facility is doing all within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse of our Residents; implementing systems to investigate all reports and allegations of mistreatment and abuse, promptly and aggressively making the necessary changes to prevent future occurrences; reporting of potential incidents of abuse; this Facility if committed to protecting our…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-20 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service training over the past year, and dementia-specific training was administered. These failures have the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Facility Assessment (dated 09/21/21) documents the following: Staff training and competencies are required for all departments upon hire and annually. At the time of orientation the Swat program covers many of the required and necessary education needed to begin employment. General training Topics: Care/Management for persons with dementia, Dementia and behavioral de-escalations/redirecting techniques. On 10/19/22 at 09:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) provided In-service Attendance Sheets, which document all training administered to Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) that has been conducted since the facility's last annual survey (09/2021). These forms document the following training was administered: Elopement/Wandering; Quality Assurance Reports/Survey Prep;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-20 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct quarterly Quality Assurance meetings. This failure has the potential to affect all 60 residents within the facility. Findings include: The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Form 672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 10/17/22 and signed by V4 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator), documents 60 residents reside within the facility. The Facility's Quality Assurance (QA) Plan policy (undated), states, The purpose of the Quality Assurance Plan is: to help identify problems and potential problems; To provide information upon which corrective action can be planned; to help analyze the need for policy or procedural changes or in-service training; to act as a record that, when analyzed, will prevent similar mishaps or injuries; and to improve quality of resident care and overall safety in the facility. The Quality Assurance Committee will conduct Quarterly meeting (at a minimum). Quarterly Assurance Committee reviews all the activities of the daily Quality Assurance Team. The Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with Dementia were engaged in therapeutic activities to meet their individual cognitive abilities and provide staff with the appropriate training to meet the needs of residents with Dementia. These failures have the potential to affect all 14 residents (R48, R111, R12, R28, R24, R34, R18, R17, R13, R45, R36, R21 and R57) residing on the facility's Special Care Unit. Findings include: The facility policy titled, Special Care Unit Cognitive/Functional Evaluation (no date), documents, It is the policy of the Special Care Unit to evaluate all residents' cognitive and functional abilities in order to most effectively design and implement therapeutic activities to meet each resident's individual needs. The facility policy titled, Alzheimer's Specific Unit Training Requirements (no date), documents The facility will provide appropriate training to individuals working with residents diagnosed with Alzheimer's and/or Dementia to help meet the residents needs, taking into consideration the severity of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure privacy during toileting for one of 15 residents reviewed (R57) for privacy in a sample of 44. Findings include: The facility policy titled, Alzheimer's Specific Unit Training Requirements (no date), documents, The facility will provide appropriate training to individuals working with residents diagnosed with Alzheimer's and/or Dementia to help meet the residents needs, taking into consideration the severity of the Alzheimer's/Dementia, the resident's physical abilities, behavior patterns and social and medical needs. The policy indicates training topics are to include, Promoting resident dignity, independence, individuality, privacy and choice. On 10/18/22 at 10:46 AM, upon entering the locked unit (B Wing), which is designated for cognitively impaired residents with Dementia/Alzheimer's Disease, R57 was observed in the unit's common bathroom located in the main hallway. R57 was sitting on the toilet urinating, with the door and privacy curtain open to the hallway. At that time, two male residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a known diagnosis of Dementia with Aggression and Behavioral Disturbances was supervised by staff and prevent resident to resident physical abuse, for one of one residents (R18) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 44. Findings include: An Abuse Prevention Program policy, dated 11/26/2016, states, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined below. This policy also states, This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of its resident, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of our residents. A Physician's Order Sheet, dated 9/16/22, documents R18 was admitted on [DATE], with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a plan of care and develop recommendations for interventions related to weight loss and falls for one of 15 residents (R21) reviewed for Care Plan Revision, in a sample of 44. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Resident Weight Monitoring (revised 3/19), documents 7. If there is an actual significant weight change (i.e. +/-5% x 1 month, +/- 7.5% x 3 months, +/- 10% x 6 months), the resident, family/guardian, physician and dietitian are notified. The physician shall be notified using the (physician) notification of weight change form. 8. The Food Service Manager and interdisciplinary team review the resident' weights and nutritional status and make recommendations for intervention. The policy further documents, 11. Significant weight changes are reviewed in the weekly Weight Committee Meeting. The Weight Committee will also identify any trends of gradual weight loss or gain. Significant changes in weights are documented in the care plan with goals and approaches/interventions listed. Monthly Weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement services to maintain and/or improve range of motion limitations for two of three residents (R43, R44) reviewed for limitations in range of motion in the sample of 44. Findings include: The facility's Range of Motion Protocol, dated 09/2008, documents, Policy: It is the policy of (the facility) to provide range of motion exercises for residents who through assessment demonstrate the need for exercise to prevent functional decline in range of motion. Procedure: The interdisciplinary team will identify those residents in need and consider the resident's age, diagnosis, prognosis, current joint condition, functional ability, and any mobility restrictions. Parts of the body on which range of motion exercises can be performed include all body joints or only those affected by disease process and may include the fingers, wrist, forearm, elbow, shoulder, toes, foot, ankle, knee, hip, and trunk. Range of motion exercises will be conducted as scheduled by nursing staff based on need determined by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to document a rationale for a decline of a gradual dose reduction suggestion, monitor for behaviors that warrant the use of an antipsychotic medication, document consistent adverse behaviors to justify the continued use of an antipsychotic medication, and conduct a psychotropic medication evaluation as directed by the facility's policy, for two of three residents (R2 and R45) reviewed for antipsychotic medications in the sample of 44. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Policy (revised 06/17/22) documents the following: It is the policy that residents shall not be given unnecessary drugs. Unnecessary drug is any drug used: In an excessive dose, including in duplicative therapy; For excessive duration; Without adequate monitoring; Without adequate indications for its use; In the presence of adverse consequences that indicate the drugs should be reduced or discontinued. This same policy documents, Any resident receiving such medications shall have a psychiatric diagnosis or documented evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$518,295 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $284,710 — penalty dated 2024-07-16
- $19,282 — penalty dated 2023-10-29
- $214,303 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-13 for 10 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $590K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146016. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.