No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

White County Rehab and Nursing

615 West Webb Street, Carmi, IL 62821 · For profit - Partnership · 74 certified beds · (618) 382-7270 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$142,002 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $142,002 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-23)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
402 Plum St · (618) 382-4193 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
311 Plum St · (618) 382-8400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1208 Oak St · (618) 308-7428 · Call to confirm hours
Park
225 E Main St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
504 Bohleber Dr · (618) 382-7081

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.1%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.5%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms99.4%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.2%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.8%18.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.4%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.3%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission7.9%26.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit26.7%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.202.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.222.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.54U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.3–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.1–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.591.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.66
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.04
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
38.5%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 45.6 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.548 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-28)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain scheduled medications from the pharmacy and secure emergency medications for 1 (R1) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 8. This failure resulted in R1 abruptly stopping and missing his scheduled seizure medication resulting in R1 experiencing two seizures lasting approximately four minutes each. Additionally, this failure has the potential to result in prolonged, life-threatening seizures when abruptly stopping anti-seizure medication. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy, which was identified to have begun on 9/23/24 at approximately 8:00 PM when the facility was unable to provide R1's scheduled seizure medications. The facility did not administer R1's seizure medications again on 9/24/24 at 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM. V6 (Regional Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing), V3 (Care Plan Coordinator/ Registered Nurse), and V24 (Dietary Manager) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 10/11/24 at 2:44 PM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 2 of 3 residents (R10, R12) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 13. This resulted in R10 experiencing feelings of fear and uncertainty for his safety in his home. Findings included: 1. R10's face sheet documented R10 was admitted to this facility on 8/23/2023 with diagnoses of Traumatic Brain Injury, Cancer and Diabetes Mellitus among others. R10's MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented R10 has a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 total, which indicates R10 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documented R10 has no impairment to upper or lower extremities, does not ambulate and independently uses a wheelchair and/or walker for locomotion. R1's face sheet documented R1 was admitted to this facility on 11/29/2024 with diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia, Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety among others. R1's MDS (minimum data set) assessment dated [DATE] documented R1 has a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms in a clean, odor free manner for 3 (R1, R2, and R3) of 3 residents reviewed for safe/clean environment in the sample of 12. Findings include:On 8/20/25 at 8:25 AM, R1s old room had a do not enter sign posted on it, and the door shut. No residents were observed to be residing in the room at this time. There was black, furry streaking, with a mold-like appearance noted around both light fixtures on the ceiling of the room. There were also green specks noted on the ceiling of the closet in the room which resembled mold. On 8/20/25 at 10:13 AM, V23 (Housekeeping) stated she knew there was something that appeared to resemble mold in R1s old room. V23 stated maintenance was working in that room but didn't know what maintenance was working on.On 8/20/25 at 11:17 AM, R1 stated, The last room I was in had mold in it. They noticed the mold two or three weeks ago. R1 confirmed he was referring to R1s old room and stated, they immediately moved me out of the room when they found it.On 8/20/25 at 12:18 PM, V10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure they had sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents timely for 4 of 5 (R6, R16, R18, and R19) residents reviewed for sufficient staff in the sample of 34. This failure has the potential to affect all 54 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings Include: The facility Midnight Census Report dated 2/22/25 documents 54 residents reside at the facility. 1. R19's admission Record with a print date of 2/27/25 documents R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diabetes. R19's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/2/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 08, which indicates a moderate cognitive deficit. R19's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of (R19) has a dx (diagnosis) of Diabetes Mellitus. Date Initiated: 07/14/2016. This Focus area includes the intervention of, Provide Diabetic snacks between meals and at bedtime per diet orders. On 2/24/25 at 1:42 PM, R19 stated they don't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure hot water was available for resident use for 5 of 5 (R3, R6, R15, R16, and R40) residents reviewed for hot water in the sample of 34. Findings Include: 1. R6's admission Record with a print date of 2/27/25 documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral palsy, morbid obesity, diabetes, lack of coordination, and urinary incontinence. R6's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/2/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R6 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R6 is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and is dependent on staff for toilet hygiene. On 2/23/25 at 2:17 PM, R6 was lying in bed and there was a strong odor of urine. V7 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) entered R6's room with this surveyor and provided incontinence care. After providing care, V7 washed her hands in R6's bathroom sink and stated the water was not hot. 2. R16's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide showers for residents needing assistance for 4 of 5 (R6, R16, R18, and R40) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's) in the sample of 34. Findings Include: 1. R6's admission Record with a print date of 2/27/25 documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral palsy, morbid obesity, diabetes, lack of coordination, and urinary incontinence. R6's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/2/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R6 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R6 is dependent on staff for bathing. R6's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of (R6) has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Limited ROM (range of motion), Limited Mobility, impaired balance. This Focus area has a start date of 2/7/2016 and the interventions for this Focus area include, Bathing/showering: The resident is (totally dependent) on (1) staff to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure restorative programs were administered for 3 of 4 (R4, R6, and R21) residents reviewed for restorative programs in the sample of 34. Findings Include: 1. R6's admission Record with a print date of 2/27/25 documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral palsy, morbid obesity, diabetes, lack of coordination, and urinary incontinence. R6's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/2/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R6 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents no passive or active range of motion was performed in the last 7 calendar days. R6's current Care plan documents a Focus area of, (I (R6), have limited ROM (range of motion) r/t (related to) Impaired balance, Pain (Multiple locations), difficulty in walking, abnormal posture, muscle weakness. Date Initiated: 01/02/2020. This Focus area includes interventions of, Execute passive and active ROM exercises to all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided per current standards of practice for 2 of 3 (R6 and R18) residents reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 34. Findings Include: 1. R6's admission Record with a print date of 2/27/25 documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral palsy, morbid obesity, diabetes, lack of coordination, and urinary incontinence. R6's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/2/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R6 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R6 is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and is dependent on staff for toilet hygiene. R6's current Care Plan documents a Focus area dated 2/7/2016 of, (R6) has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Limited ROM (range of motion), Limited Mobility, Impaired balance. Date Initiated: 02/07/2016. This Focus area includes the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received nutritional supplementation as recommended by the dietitian to prevent weight loss for 3 of 6 (R22, R31, R48) residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 34. Findings Include: 1. R31's admission Record with a print date of 2/27/25 documents R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include muscle wasting and atrophy. R31's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/7/25 documents R31 has a severe cognitive impairment. R31's current Care plan documents a Focus area of, (R31's) diet is (Regular diet, mechanical soft texture, Regular thin liquids). Resident is at a (Moderate) nutritional risk d/t (due to) dysphagia. Date Initiated: 7/02/2019. Interventions for this same Focus area include, Discuss food likes and dislikes. Date Initiated: 07/02/2019 .Respect resident preferences at all times Date Initiated: 07/02/2019 . R31's current Care Plan does not document a Focus area or intervention related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and observation the facility failed to maintain communication and collaboration with an offsite dialysis center for 1 (R22) of residents reviewed for dialysis in a sample of 34. The Findings Include: R22's admission profile sheet documents an admission date of 11/6/2023. This same document includes the following diagnoses: calculus of kidney and chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe) and unspecified hydronephrosis. R22's current month physician orders document a diet order for low concentrated sweets dysphasia advanced texture, regular consistency, no oranges/orange juice/bananas/fresh potatoes-limit milk to 1/2 cup per day, 1-ounce extra protein per meal and no added salt. This same document lists dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday three times a week. R22's care plan has a focus area of: I currently require hemo dialysis related to chronic kidney disease. The focus area is: I will be complaint with labs and diagnostics if ordered by my doctor through the review date of 5/12/2025, I will be free of any discomfort or adverse side effects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure bedtime snacks were offered to 2 of 2 (R19 and R16) residents reviewed for snacks in the sample of 34. Findings Include: 1. R19's admission Record with a print date of 2/27/25 documents R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diabetes. R19's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/2/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 08, which indicates a moderate cognitive deficit. R19's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of (R19) has a dx (diagnosis) of Diabetes Mellitus. Date Initiated: 07/14/2016. This Focus area includes the intervention of, Provide Diabetic snacks between meals and at bedtime per diet orders. On 2/24/25 at 1:42 PM, R19 stated they don't get snacks at night, and she is diabetic and is supposed to have a snack each night. 2. R16's admission Record with a print date of 2/27/25 documents R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic kidney disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed per current standards of practice for 3 of 6 (R6, R18, and R31) residents reviewed for infection control in the sample of 34. Findings Include: 1. R6's admission Record with a print date of 2/27/25 documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral palsy, morbid obesity, diabetes, lack of coordination, and urinary incontinence. R6's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/2/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R6 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R6 is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and is dependent on staff for toilet hygiene. R6's current Care Plan documents a Focus area dated 2/7/2016 of, (R6) has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Limited ROM (range of motion), Limited Mobility, Impaired balance. Date Initiated: 02/07/2016. This Focus area includes the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy during perineal, urinary catheter, and wound care for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for personal privacy in the sample of 3. Findings include: R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 10/8/24 with diagnoses including enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, cerebral infarction. R1's 11/20/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating R1 was cognitively intact. R1's care plan documented a 10/9/24 focus area of limited range of motion due to weakness and a 10/9/24 focus area of an alteration with the ability to care for self and need of assistance due to activity intolerance, decreased strength, endurance, and weakness. On 2/21/25 at 10:45 AM, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) and V5 (CNA) completed hand hygiene and donned gowns and gloves then assisted R1 from his wheelchair to the bed with a mechanical lift. V5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide perineal, urinary catheter, and wound care per standards of practice to prevent infections for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control in a sample of 3. Findings include: R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 10/8/24 with diagnoses including enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, cerebral infarction. R1's 11/20/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating R1 was cognitively intact. The same MDS documents that R1 is dependent for toileting hygiene, toilet transfers, and chair to bed transfers. R1 has an indwelling catheter, and R1 is always incontinent of bowel. R1's Care Plan documents a focus area of I currently have an infection d/t (due to) C-Difficile (clostridium difficile) with an initiation date of 01/28/2025. Documented interventions for this focus area include: Emphasize good hand washing techniques…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. Findings Include: R2's admission Record documents an initial admission date of 11/21/2022. R2's admission Record documented the following diagnoses of down syndrome, unspecified, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 15, indicating R2 is cognitively intact. R1's admission Record documents an initial admission date of 5/1/2022. R1's admission Record documented the following diagnoses of major depressive disorders, generalized anxiety disorder and delusional disorders. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. R1's Facility Progress Notes dated 12/20/2024 at 10:11 AM by V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely initiate an investigate for an abuse allegation for 1 of 3 resident (R2) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 6. Findings Include: R2's admission Record documents an initial admission date of 11/21/2022. R2's admission Record documented the following diagnoses of down syndrome, unspecified, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 15, indicating R2 is cognitively intact. R1's admission Record documents an initial admission date of 5/1/2022. R1's admission Record documented the following diagnoses of major depressive disorders, generalized anxiety disorder and delusional disorders. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. R1's Facility Progress Notes dated 12/20/2024 at 4:00 AM by V11 (Registered Nurse/RN),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff donned Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in accordance with current Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations for infection control practices to prevent the spread of communicable disease. This has the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: 1. R1's admission Record documents an admission date of 4/12/2024 and included diagnoses of Metabolic Encephalopathy, Metabolic Acidosis, Chronic Kidney Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, and Epilepsy. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R1's Care Plan documents R1 currently has a communication deficit related to language barrier. The Goal is documented as R1 will be able to make basic needs known by using gestures and communication board on a daily basis through the review date. The Care Plan also documented R1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement procedures for timely acquisition of medications to administer as ordered for 4 (R1, R4, R5, and R7) out of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services in a sample of 8. Findings include: 1. On 10/3/24 at 1:11 PM, V9 (Case Coordinator) stated when R1 was admitted to the facility R1 had two seizures in the first week due to the facility not administering R1's seizure medication. R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 9/23/24 with diagnoses including dysphagia following cerebral infarction, extrapyramidal and movement disorder, and epilepsy. R1's 9/25/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating R1 was severely cognitively impaired. R1's 9/23/24 After Visit Summary from the hospital documented in part . Start taking these medications . lacosamide 10 mg/ ml solution . Commonly known as: Vimpat . Administer 10 ml through peg tube 2 (two) times a day .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement current behavior interventions for a resident with inappropriate sexual behaviors and failed to re-assess and implement progressive individualized interventions for increased occurrences of unwanted sexual behaviors for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for behavioral health in the sample of 5. Findings include: R1's face sheet documented an admission date of 4/12/24 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, epilepsy, cerebral infarction. R1's 7/14/24 Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented no Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score due to R1 being rarely/ never understood. A handwritten document was provided by the V1 (Administrator) that documents interviews from R9 and R8 regarding an incident with R1. At the top of the document, it reads Interviews on 5/21/24. R9's interview: He (R1) followed (R8) to our room. (R8) went into the bathroom. He (R1) pulled the curtain and sat down on (R8's) rollator. He (R1) then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident-to-resident abuse for 3 (R1, R2, and R4) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse out of a sample of 13. Findings include: 1. The facility's final Long-Term Care Facility .Serious Injury Incident and Communicable Disease Report dated 8/12/24 documented alleged abuse between R4 and R1 on 8/4/24. Both residents are marked as not interviewable. Under Detailed incident summary . the following is documented: This administrator was educated about an alleged incident between (R4) and (R1) on 8/4/24. Allegedly (R4) and (R1) were kissing and touching each other sexually . Investigation did not confirm incident. (R5) is not a credible witness due to a BIMS (equal to) 5 and often story tells, which is part of his care plan. When (R1) was interviewed by (V6 - Registered Nurse/RN) she indicated that, No, that didn't happen. Staff that were working did not see any interactions between (R4) and (R1). Interview of (R5), conducted by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident-to-resident abuse were reported in a timely manner to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including the State Agency for 3 (R1, R2 and R4) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse out of a sample of 13. Findings include: 1. R2's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 4/30/24 with diagnoses including: need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia, muscle wasting, lack of coordination, schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented no Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score due to R2 being rarely/ never understood. R4's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 4/12/24 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, epilepsy, cerebral infarction. R4's 7/14/24 MDS documented no BIMS score due to R4 being rarely/ never understood. On 8/8/24 at 1:50 PM, V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) stated that on 8/6/24 V10 was walking through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Agency for 1 of 1 resident (R12) in the sample of 13. Findings include: R12's Face sheet documents R12 has an admission date of 03/18/24 with diagnoses including Paranoid Schizophrenia, Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depression, Cerebral Infarction, Other Paralytic Syndrome following unspecified Cerebrovascular disease, Paralytic gait and Abnormalities of gait and mobility. R12's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating R12 is cognitively intact. R6's Face sheet documents R6 has an admission date of 01/20/24 with diagnoses including Encephalopathy, Cerebral Infarction, Polyneuropathy, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting left non dominant side and Acquired absence of left leg below knee. R6's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 15 indicating resident is cognitively intact. R8's Face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify an allegation of sexual abuse and then failed to complete a thorough investigation for an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 (R12) of 1 residents in a sample of 13. Finding include: R12's Face sheet documents R12 has an admission date of 03/18/24 with diagnoses including Paranoid Schizophrenia, Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depression, Cerebral Infarction, Other Paralytic Syndrome following unspecified Cerebrovascular disease, Paralytic gait and Abnormalities of gait and mobility. R12's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating R12 is cognitively intact. R6's Face sheet documents R6 has an admission date of 01/20/24 with diagnoses including Encephalopathy, Cerebral Infarction, Polyneuropathy, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting left non dominant side and Acquired absence of left leg below knee. R6's MDS dated [DATE] documents a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assessment a resident for 1 (R8) of 1 resident in a sample of 13. Findings include: R8's Facesheet documents R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R8's MDS dated [DATE] section C - Cognitive patterns contains only dashes for the complete section. Section D - Mood contains only dashes except for D0700 Social Isolation which designates an answer of 8 - resident unable to respond. and section E - Behavior contains only dashes with the exception of E0100 Potential Indicators of Psychosis which designates none of the above, indicating no hallucinations or delusions. On 06/06/24 at 10:46 AM, V21 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator/MDS) stated she does not do sections C, D, E or Q on the MDS. V21 stated that V3 (Social Services Director) does those sections. On 06/06/24 at 12:45 PM, V3 stated R8's MDS (Minimum Data Set) only has dashes in section C, D, and E because when she was doing the assessment with him she could not get any answers from him.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0571 — isolated
    Limit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's personal funds were not charged for service while receiving Medicaid benefits for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for billing in the sample of 6. Findings include: 1. R1's face sheet documented an admission date of 7/19/21 and a discharge date of 11/7/23 with diagnoses including: rotaviral enteritis, hypotension, syncope, anxiety disorder, and acute kidney failure. On 2/22/24 at 11:54 AM, V3 (R1's Power of Attorney/ POA) said she had been in contact with the facility regarding R1's insurance status. V3 said she had notified the facility she was applying for Medicaid for R1. V3 said the facility failed to submit the required documentation to Illinois Department of Human Services (IDHS) and billed the resident as private pay. V3 said she had contacted IDHS and was told it was the fault of the facility and she could not be billed for service dates after the application was submitted. V3 said she had applied for Medicaid for R1 in July of 2023. On 2/22/24 at 2:23 PM, V2 (IDHS Casework Manager) said the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide supervision and assistance during outside medical appointments for a resident with physical limitations for 1 (R2) of 3 residents reviewed for risk of accidents and adequate supervision out of a sample 6. Findings include: 1. R2's face sheet documented an admission date of 1/22/21 with diagnoses including: Huntington's disease, neuromuscular scoliosis, muscle wasting and atrophy, urinary incontinence, anxiety disorder, fusion of spine lumbar region. R2's January 12, 2024, Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R2 was cognitively intact. This same MDS documented R2 required partial/ moderate assistance with toilet hygiene and lower body dressing; and supervision or touching assistance with lying to sitting on side of bed, sit to stand, chair/ bed- to- chair transfer, and toilet transfer. R2's 3/12/21 care plan documented in part . (diagnosis) of Huntington's disease exhibited by jerking, involuntary movements, muscle rigidity, involuntary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment after an admission to hospice care for 1 (R18) of 1 resident reviewed for hospice services in a sample of 31. Findings include: R18's Face Sheet with a print date of 1/11/2024 documents diagnoses including: Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Right Dominant side, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Alzheimer's Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Major Depressive Disorder, and history of Transient Ischemic Attack and Cerebral Infarction without Residual Deficits. R18's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents no Brief Interview for Mental Status should be performed due to resident is rarely understood. R18's Physician Order Sheet dated 01/01/24 documents: admit to hospice dated 05/18/23. R18's medical record does not contain a significant change MDS for the admission to hospice care. On 01/11/24 at 10:45 AM, V15 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator/MDS) stated, she must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a Level II PASARR (Pre-admission Screening/Resident Review) screening due to a mental health diagnosis for 1 (R4) of 1 resident reviewed for PASSAR screenings in the sample of 31. Findings include: R4's Face Sheet documents an original admission date of 07/06/09 with admitting diagnoses including: Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy, Hyperlipidemia, Heart Failure, Venous Insufficiency, and Spondylosis without Myelopathy or Radiculopathy Cervical Region. R4's Face Sheet documents a diagnosis of Schizophrenia dated 08/24/22. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents: a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 00 indicating R4 has a severe cognitive impairment. R4's medical record contains no documentation of a Level II PASARR screening. R4's Interagency Certification of Screening Results dated 06/24/09 documents: screening indicated nursing facility services are appropriate. On 01/11/24 at 10:45 AM, V8 (Social Services Director/SSD) stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent falls for 2 of 4 (R6, R31) residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 31. Findings included: 1.R6's EHR (Electronic Health Record) under admission, documents R6 was admitted to this facility on 9/5/2023 under hospice care with pertinent diagnoses of COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B, and Diabetes Mellitus type 2 among others. According to R6's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/18/2023 R6 is assessed as having impairment to both lower extremities, dependent on staff for transferring and uses a wheelchair for locomotion. This same MDS documents R6 was mentally assessed with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) and received a score of 12 out of 15, indicating R6 has moderate cognitive impairment. R6's EHR under Progress Notes document R6 fell on [DATE], 10/28/23, 11/1/23 (2 times), 11/10/23, 11/11/23, 11/14/23 and 11/15/23. R6's care plan, with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering a PRN (as Needed) anti-psychotic medication, failed to observe 14 day time frames for PRN anti-psychotic medication orders, and failed to ensure when the PRN anti-psychotic medication renewed that the prescribing physician evaluates the resident for continued appropriateness of the medication for 1 of 5 (R6) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 31. Findings included: R6's EHR (Electronic Health Record) under admission, documents R6 was admitted to this facility on 9/5/2023 with pertinent diagnoses of COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3B, and Diabetes Mellitus type 2 among others. According to R6's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 12/18/2023 R6 is assessed as having impairment to both lower extremities, dependent on staff for transferring and uses a wheelchair for locomotion. This same MDS documents R6 was mentally assessed with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) and received a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident clothing is returned from the laundry in a timely manner or replaced for 3 of 10 residents (R6, R7, R10) reviewed for laundry in the sample of 10. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 11:25am, R7 was alert and oriented. R7 stated he has lived at the facility about 4 1/2 years. R7 stated since his admission, the facility has a problem with not returning his laundry, and he has had multiple garments go missing, including the top to a pair of pajamas which was never returned from the laundry within, The past several months. R7 stated he informed staff, who searched for the item. R7 stated the facility did not offer to reimburse him when the garment was not located. On 12/13/23 at 9:35am, V9, Certified Nursing Assistant, stated resident clothing returned from the laundry routinely ends up in the wrong room. On 12/13/23 at 9:50am, V6, Social Services Designee, stated there is an ongoing problem with laundry not being returned to the right residents. On 12/13/23 10:10am, V8, CNA, stated laundry not making it back to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize its Abuse Policy by immediately initiating investigations into resident reports of staff to resident retaliation and misappropriation of property for 3 of 10 residents (R2 R3 R6) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 10. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 11:20am, R2 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R2 stated within the past 2 weeks he has had a brand new $600 laptop stolen from his room. R2 stated V1, Administrator, is aware of this. R2 stated staff did not try to look for the items and did not call the police, and staff didn't interview him. R2 stated, We residents think (V4, former Certified Nursing Assistant) has been stealing things. On 12/12/23 at 11:25am R7 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R7 stated he has not had anything stolen, but he has heard other residents state that V4 has stolen things from them. On 12/12/23 at 11:30am, R3 was alert and oriented to person and place, but not time. R3 stated he does not like it when V4 works because V4, Got mad at me for calling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to The State Agency and local law enforcement allegations of staff to resident abuse and misappropriation for 3 of 10 residents (R2 R3 R6) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 10. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 11:20am, R2 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R2 stated within the past 2 weeks he has had a brand new $600 laptop stolen from his room. R2 stated V1, Administrator, is aware of this. R2 stated staff did not try to look for the items and did not call the police, and staff didn't interview him. R2 stated, We residents think (V4, former Certified Nursing Assistant) has been stealing things. On 12/12/23 at 11:25am R7 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R7 stated he has not had anything stolen, but he has heard other residents state that V4 has stolen things from them. On 12/12/23 at 11:30am, R3 was alert and oriented to person and place, but not time. R3 stated he does not like it when V4 works because V4, Got mad at me for calling the State Agency and complaining about her, so…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate resident reports of staff to resident retaliation and misappropriation of property for 3 of 10 residents (R2 R3 R6) for abuse in the sample of 10. Findings include: On 12/12/23 at 11:20am, R2 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R2 stated within the past 2 weeks he has had a brand new $600 laptop stolen from his room. R2 stated V1, Administrator, is aware of this. R2 stated staff did not try to look for the items and did not call the police, and staff didn't interview him. R2 stated, We residents think (V4, former Certified Nursing Assistant) has been stealing things. On 12/12/23 at 11:25am R7 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R7 stated he has not had anything stolen, but he has heard other residents state that V4 has stolen things from them. On 12/12/23 at 11:30am, R3 was alert and oriented to person and place, but not time. R3 stated he does not like it when V4 works because V4, Got mad at me for calling The State Agency and complaining about her, so to get me back, she doesn't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to appropriately supervise a resident with a history of elopement for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for supervision in the sample of 4. Findings include: 1. R1's face sheet documented an admission date of 3/1/23 indicates diagnoses including: cerebral infarction, unsteadiness on feet, dementia, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, major depressive disorder, presence of cardiac pacemaker. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documented R1 was independent with moving from a seated position to standing and walking. R1's care plan initiated 6/23/23 documented Focus: My current risk to Wandering/ Elopement is (High Risk 7 or higher) and my safety will be monitored every shift by all staff . Goal: 7/21/23 I will comply with wearing a wander guard as needed . Interventions:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to allow residents the right to smoke for 7 of 7 residents (R1, R2, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9) reviewed for smoking in a sample of 13. Findings Include: R1's face sheet documents an admission date of 08/02/23 and a diagnosis of tobacco use. R1's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) is documented at 15 indicating cognitively intact. R1's Care plan dated 08/02/23 documents: R1 is currently a nicotine user and uses cigarettes with interventions documented including I (R1) will be supervised every 2 hours during smoking times, R1's smoking materials will be kept by the nursing staff and given to R1 every 2 hours for smoke time with a date of 08/02/23. R2's Face sheet documents an admission date of 06/20/2019 with diagnosis including Nicotine dependence, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and schizophrenia. R2's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide the correct portion size as documented on the approved menu for 6 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R5, R6, R7 and R8) reviewed for portion size in a sample of 13. Findings include: The Diet Spreadsheet dated Day 17: Tuesday documents: regular diet: #6 scoop (5.3 ounces) of pork, #8 scoop (4 oz) scoop of rice, 4 oz of green beans and onions, 4 oz of pears, and bread with margarine. On 08/22/23 at 12:15PM V13 (Dietary) was weighing the pieces of pork for the regular diet on a food scale. V13 did not zero the scale out after small pieces of meat were left on the scale. V13 was observed weighing pork and placing each portion on the plate of the trays containing R1, R2, R5, R6, R7, and R8's diet card. The weight of the pork servings were observed as follows: R1- 2.5 ounces, R2- 3 ounces, R5-3 ounces, R6- 3 ounces, R7- 2.5 ounces, and R8- 3 ounces. On 8/22/23 at 12:30 PM, R1, R2, R5, R6, R7, and R8's meal trays containing the pork servings were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-02 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure quarterly assessments were completed in a timely manner for 8 of 8 residents (R3, R8, R12, R18, R23, R29, R31 and R36) reviewed for timely quarterly assessments in a sample of 30 . The Findings Include: 1. R3's admission record documents an admission date of 3/18/21. On 12/1/22 at 10:30 AM, V4 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator) confirmed that the most recent completed minimum data set (MDS) completed on 7/22/22 . V4 stated that a quarterly MDS was due on 10/20/22 and is not completed. 2. R8's admission record documents an admission date of 9/13/17. On 12/1/22 at 10:30 AM, V4 confirmed that the most recent MDS completed was on 7/22/22 with one in progress but not yet completed due on 10/21/22. 3. R12's admission record documents an admission date of 12/10/21. On 12/1/22 at 10:30 AM, V4 confirmed that the most recent completed MDS was completed on 7/21/22 with one in progress but not yet completed due on 10/20/22. 4. R18's admission record documents an admission date of 2/12/16. On 12/1/22 at 10:30 AM, V4 confirmed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-08-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the air conditioning unit was in working order in the kitchen to provide dietary staff a comfortable working environment. This failure has the potential to affect all 44 residents residing in the facility.Findings include: On 8/20/25 at 10:27 AM, V19 (Dietary Staff) stated the air conditioning unit has been down in the kitchen for approximately the last 3 months. V19 stated the reason for the long wait is the facility was waiting on a quote for new unit. V19 stated it does get hotter than usual in the kitchen with the air conditioning not working causing her to perspire more. On 8/20/25 at 10:32 AM, V15 (Dietary Staff) stated he has worked here one month, and the air conditioning hasn't worked in the kitchen since he's been here. V15 stated it does get hotter than usual in the kitchen with the air conditioner not working causing him to perspire more. On 8/20/25 at 10:35 AM, V16 (Dietary Staff) stated the air conditioning has been broken for a long time in the kitchen. V16 could not remember how long but stated it had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$142,002 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $142,002 — penalty dated 2024-10-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$814K
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 17%Other / private 11%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $814K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$311per resident / day
operating cost
$9,444per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$341per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146124. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next