Mado Healthcare - Uptown
4621 North Racine Avenue, Chicago, IL 60640 · For profit - Corporation · 132 certified beds · (773) 784-2300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $123,614 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-20)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.2% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.5% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 98.4% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.7% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.6% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.2% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.9% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.2% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.2% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.88 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.88 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 5.8–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.3–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 112.2 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.87 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.01 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of accounting for resident's funds and safeguarding resident's funds against theft, failed to follow their system of updating resident's belongings, and failed to ensure shipping address of online purchase for the resident was to the facility. These failures resulted on R1 and R6 incurring fraudulent debit card transactions on R1's and R6's bank accounts. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 03/25/2024 when V14 (R1's family member) completed a concern form regarding unexplained activities on R1's bank account. On 09/16/2024 at 10:45am, V1 was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. This surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 09/23/2024. Although the immediacy was removed, the deficiency remains at a level 2 until the facility can determine the effectiveness of the implementation of removal and effectiveness of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of records and interview, the facility failures are the following: Failed to follow interventions in the care plan, review and/or revised the fall prevention care plan of 1 out of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents and hazards. Failures affected 1 resident (R1) who had an incident of fall resulting to right hip/pelvic fracture that required surgery in the hospital. Finding includes: R1 is [AGE] years old, a resident in the facility since 10/08/2020. R1 has moderate impairment of cognition based on brief interview of mental status (BIMS) dated 10/15/2024, with a score of 12. R1 was not in the facility during review, per V10 (Registered Nurse) nursing notes dated 12/28/2024. R1 was transferred to the hospital due to vomiting. On 12/31/2024, at 11:21 AM. V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that R1 used to be in the current floor that she is working. R1 was admitted on a different floor after hospitalization. V8 stated that R1 underwent hip surgery. R1 was ambulating without any help before the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a prescribed treatment to one resident (R3). This failure affected one out of three residents reviewed for treatment services.Finding include:R3's medical diagnoses include but are not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, localized edema, cellulitis of unspecified part of limb, essential hypertension, heart failure.R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R3's cognition is intact.On 08/18/25 at 11:48am R3 observed in first floor dining area with no bandages to bilateral lower legs.On 08/18/25 at 1:51pm R3 stated that the nurses wrap her legs sometimes. R3 stated that she did not get her legs wrapped today on 08/18/25.Review of R3's treatment administration record shows documentation of R3's legs being wrapped with ace bandages.On 08/19/25 at 10:23 am R3 observed in first floor dining are with no bandages to bilateral lower legs.On 08/19/25 at 10:23am…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right of the resident to be free from physical abuse in 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 8. The findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year old male with a diagnosis including COPD, Dementia, Major depressive disorder and History of falling. R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13/15. R1 ambulates independently by wheelchair. R1 is care planned for being a potential risk for Abuse/Neglect. R1 was first admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Facility Incident Report Form dated 6/6/25 includes statement that on 6/4/25 corporate staff were reviewing video recording that shows V3 ( Housekeeper) moves R1's wheelchair unnecessarily and forcefully. R1 places his foot on the ground appearing to be non verbally communicating that he does not want to move. Despite this V3 lifts the front wheels of the wheelchair and moves R1 whose feet are visibly hanging. On 6/20/25 at 10:39AM R1 stated yes I remember…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy by failing to notify the nurse on duty of a resident fall and failed to ensure that a resident was immediately assessed by a nurse after sustaining a fall. This failure effected 1 resident (R1) out of 5 residents reviewed for falls in a total sample of seven residents. Findings include: Facility Final Incident Investigation (dated 04/25/2025) documents in part: The certified nursing assistant stated that in the morning he went to the room of R1 and he was sitting on the floor. He tried to get him up from the floor. Staff denied being physically aggressive towards R1. He denied causing any harm to R1. The facility is unable to substantiate the allegation of physical abuse. There was no ill-intentions or intentional act towards R1. R1 sustained a close fracture of the right shoulder. Staff were in-serviced on 04/22/2025, on appropriate transfer practices. Fall Prevention Policy (undated) documents in part: It is the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect resident's right to be free from physical abuse. This failure affected one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: On 04/22/25 at 11:30 AM, R1 stated R2 tried to choke him when R1 was in the 1st floor dining room doing activities. R1 stated, R2 came up from behind R1 and grabbed R1 around the neck with R2's arm. R1 stated he was not expecting it, so he was surprised when R2 did that. R1 stated one of the staff got R1 off R2 and R2 was removed from the room. R1 does not remember if R2 said anything as he was trying to choke R1. R1 stated R2 did not look angry and I don't know why he did that. On 04/22/25 at 11:10 AM, observed R2 sitting in his bedroom looking at an opened bible on his bedside table. V21 (Business Office Manager) acted as translator because R2's primary language is Spanish. R2 stated via V21 that God, told me to choke him (R1) so I did and God told me to do this because he (R1) was going to try to choke…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to (a) assess and document pressure ulcer characteristics and measurement on a weekly basis and (b) ensure that the orders provided by wound nurse practitioner (NP) were performed to 1 (R3) out of 3 residents reviewed for Improper nursing care. The findings include: R3's admission record showed initial admission date on 5/19/2021 with diagnoses not limited to Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, Pressure ulcer of right heel stage 3, Morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, Chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, Pressure ulcer of right buttock stage 2, Unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure, Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity, Unspecified urinary incontinence, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Schizoaffective disorder, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R3 was discharged from the facility on 4/15/2025. On 4/22/25 at 10:25AM V5 (LPN / Licensed Practical Nurse) stated wound treatment is done by nurse on duty, had regularly worked and provided treatment to R3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-20 · tag F0659 — widespreadProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a qualified licensed nurse oversee the facility's restorative nursing program. The failure has the potential to affect all 120 residents that receive restorative programming. Findings include: On 11/17/24 at 10:25 AM, V5 (Restorative Director) stated that V5 is the restorative director and that V5 is a COTA (Certified Occupational Therapist Assistant). On 11/18/24 at 9:55 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that V5 supervises the restorative programming in the facility. On 11/18/24 at 12:22 PM, V5 stated that V5 creates and evaluates all restorative programs in the facility. V5 explained that V5 is responsible for assessing residents for restorative need and creating a restorative care plan. V5 stated that all restorative certified nursing assistant aides report to and are supervised by V5 and V5 completes all the training on restorative for staff members. V5 stated that V5 was qualified to supervise the restorative nursing program because V5 had taken a course on restorative nursing. On 11/19/24 at 10:09 AM, V2 (Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure window blinds are not missing blind panels/slats in an effort to provide a homelike environment to residents. This failure affected 5 (R53, R74, R76, R82, R91) residents reviewed for homelike environment in the total sample of 57 residents. Findings include: On 11/17/2024 at 10:27 AM, inside R82's room, the vertical window blinds have missing panels/slats. There were no panels/slats on the floor. On 11/17/2024 at 10:29 AM, inside R91's room, the vertical window blinds have missing panels/slats. There were no panels/slats on the floor. On 11/17/2024 at 10:35 AM, V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was requested to check R82's window blinds. V12 stated the window blinds should have more coverage to provide privacy; there were missing panels (slats). I don't know how long it has been like that. No, I don't see any window blind panels (slats) on the floor. On 11/17/2024 at 10:38 AM, V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant) checked R91's window…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen signs were placed on the resident's door and failed to properly label and date oxygen tubing. This failure affects 3 residents (R86, R93, R25) and has the potential to affect all 25 residents that reside on the 5th floor. Findings include: On 11/17/24 at 10:47 AM, R25 was observed lying in bed with nasal cannula in R25's nostrils. R25 had an oxygen concentrator on next to R25's bed, delivering oxygen to R25. No oxygen in use signage was observed on the resident's door or in any place of high visibility on the unit. On 11/17/24 at 10:52 AM, V10 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) affirmed that there was no sign on R25's door. V10 stated that V10 was unsure if there is supposed to be oxygen signage on the door to alert others to R25's oxygen use. V10 stated that oxygen is flammable and can combust if exposed to flames. On 11/19/24 at 10:27 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated when residents are undergoing oxygen therapy, the facility standard is that the resident should have a sign on their door stating that oxygen is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the controlled drugs-count record form was not prematurely signed by in and outgoing nurses. These failures have the potential to affect all residents on the second, fourth, fifth, and six floors receiving medications. Findings Include: On 11/17/24 at 12:40 pm, on the second floor the controlled drugs- count record sheet was prematurely signed for the outgoing nurse. On 11/17/24 at 12:41 pm, surveyor inquired to V9 LPN (License Practical Nurse) why is the controlled drugs- count sheet prematurely sign for the outgoing nurse? V9 stated, I always sign for outgoing when I sign for incoming because there are no medications in there. Surveyor inquired to V9 if it is checked with the incoming nurse at the beginning and ending of each shift. V9 stated, that's how I do it, I sign both when I come in because nothing is in there. On 11/17/24 at 1:45 pm, surveyor requested the controlled drug-count records for all resident floors. V2 DON (Director of Nursing) gave the third, fourth, fifth and six floor's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to discard an expired medication. This failure has a potential to affect one resident (R74) in a sample size of 57 residents. Findings Include: On 11/17/24 at 12:20 pm, the third-floor medication cart had R74's Breo Ellipta (Fluticasone Furoate-Vilanterol Inhalation Aerosol Powder Breath) that was labeled to use by 11/14/24. R74's admission diagnosis includes but not limited to asthma, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), and congestive heart failure. R74's active orders as of 11/18/24 documents in part, Fluticasone Furoate-Vilanterol Inhalation Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 200-25 MCG/ACT 1 puff inhale orally one time a day for Antiasthma. R74's MAR (Medication Administration Record) documented in part, (Fluticasone Furoate-Vilanterol Inhalation Aerosol Powder Breath) had a check mark indicating administered on 11/15/24, 11/16/24 and 11/17/24. On 11/17/24 at 12:21 pm, V15 RN (Registered Nurse) stated, I cleaned the cart and missed that. Observed V15 take the inhaler out of the medication cart. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Enhanced Barrier precaution (EBP) sign is posted for a resident on EBP and failed to ensure a PPE (personal protective equipment) bin is available for resident on EBP. These failures affected 1 (R76) resident reviewed for infection control. Findings include: On 11/17/2024 at 10:25 AM on 3rd floor, there was an EBP sign posted by the door with R76's room identifier. A PPE bin was also available outside of the room with R76's room identifier. The room was located at the end of the hallway. This surveyor knocked on the door. No one was in the room. On 11/17/2024 at 10:46 AM, R76 was in a room located right across the 3rd floor's nurse's station in the middle of the hallway. The room identifier did not indicate R76 was residing in that room. There was no EBP sign nor PPE bin on site. ON 11/17/2024 at 11:36 am, on the end hallway on 3rd floor with V15 (Agency Registered Nurse) this surveyor pointed to the EBP sign posted on the door and the PPE bin outside of the room and inquired who was the resident on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide functioning call device for residents requiring assistance from staff. This failure affected 2 (R91, R98) residents reviewed for resident call system in the total sample of 57 residents. Findings include: On 11/17/2024 at 10:40 AM, V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant) checked R91's call device and stated the call light is broken; the call light box is not lit to indicate it is working. On 11/17/2024 at 10:49 AM, V12 checked R98's call device and stated the call light box is not lit to indicate it is working. ON 11/17/2024 between 10:52am and 11:05am, V13 (Maintenance Supervisor) checked R91's and R98's call devices and corroborated the observations done by this surveyor with V12. On 11/17/2024 at 11:09 AM, V13 stated it is expected to have a properly functioning call light to let the nursing staff know the resident needs assistance. How can they ask for assistance if the call light is broken. On 11/18/2024 at 11:23am, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated we should provide a functioning call device to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their own policy to conduct a complete background check of employees prior to working with residents. This failure has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: The (Effective as of 08/29/2024) untitled document indicated that V5 (PRSC) was hired on 07/31/2023, V7 (CNA Supervisor) was hired on 04/01/2024, V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was hired on 06/27/2024, V9 (CNA) was hired on 08/01/2024, V10 (CNA) was hired on 04/30/2024, and V11 (PRSC) was hired on 03/31/2024. The (09/06/2024) email correspondence with V1 (Administrator) documented that V5 works on the 3rd floor, V7 works on all the floors, V8 works on any floor, V9 works on the 2nd and 3rd floor, V10 works on the 3rd floor, and V11 works on the 4th floor. On 09/04/2024 at 10:33am, V4 (Office Manager/HR Director) stated the purpose of the healthcare worker background check is to see if staff are eligible to work in a nursing home facility. To make sure the correct kind of people with good character are working here at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-07 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Daily Nurse Staffing was conspicuously posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. This failure has the potential to affect all 120 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 12/04/2023, V1 (Administrator) presented a facility census of 120 residents. On 12/04/2023 at 9:10 am, surveyors enter the facility and did not observe the Daily Nurse Staffing that included the facility name, date, residents census and hours worked per shift for licensed and unlicensed staff responsible for resident care posted visibly in a prominent place in the facility. On 12/04/23 at 1:08 pm, Surveyor requested V1 (Administrator) to locate the daily staff posting for the facility and V1 stated, We (referring to the facility) don't have one. When V1 was asked the importance of the Daily Staff Posting for the facility V1 stated So everyone knows how many staff are in the building. V1 explained that a schedule is kept at the receptionist desk however there is no posting for visitors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. These failures have the potential to affect all residents who consume food prepared by the facility. Findings include: On 12/04/23 at 10:06 AM, the food service area toured. Floor of food service area has ceramic floor tiles missing and cracked in front of the dishwasher and steam table. Grout between tiles throughout food service area are heavily soiled from black encrustation and not easily cleanable. The entrance/interior of walk in cooler has ceramic tiles missing and cracked on the floor. The floor is not easily cleanable. On 12/04/23 at 10:10 AM, The dietary hand sink located next to coffee machine has cleaned silverware under coffee machine on shelf. The silverware and coffee machine are subject to splash from the handwashing sink when in use. Staff were observed using the handwashing sink during this observation. On 12/4/23 at 10:08 AM, the dry food storage room was observed with two plastic bulk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the call light device was within reach for one resident (R19). This failure has the potential to affect one resident (R19) out of a sample of 44. Findings include: R19 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Epilepsy, Schizophrenia, Alzheimer's Disease, and Pure Hypercholesterolemia. R19 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 00. Care plan focus: ADL's related to medical and psychiatric condition (4/21/2022) documents in interventions to keep call light within reach and instruct the resident in the proper use of the call light. Call light assessment had not been completed for R19. On 12/04/23 at 10:57 am, surveyor observed R19 in the bed with call light device on the floor behind the night stand and not within reach of the resident. R19 stated Don't know when asked where her call light was. On 12/04/2023 at 10:59 am, V20 (CNA) stated R19's call light was on her bed, as he was looking for the call light, and then said he does not see R19's call light. On 12/04/2023 at 11:01 am, V21 (LPN) stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) to one resident (R28) reviewed for ADL's in the sample of 44. Findings include: R28 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Pneumonia, Moderate Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Epilepsy, Schizoaffective Disorder, Allergic Contact Dermatitis and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. R28 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11. On 12/4/2023 at 11:17 am, surveyor observed R28's fingernails to be long on both hands. R28 stated that his nails are too long for a man and would like them to be trimmed. On 12/5/2023 at 2:42 pm, surveyor observed R28's fingernails to be long on both hands. On 12/05/2023 at 2:46 pm, V16 (CNA) stated resident's fingernails are trimmed every time she notices that they are dirty and or long and nail care is provided with showers. On 12/06/2023 at 12:34 pm, V1 (Administrator) stated staff are expected to provide nail care when providing ADL care, during showers and as needed. Activities of Daily Living Policy dated 1/4/2023 documents, in part, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide supervision while shaving for one resident (R5), reviewed in a sample of 44. Findings include: R5 is [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Schizoaffective Disorder, Schizophrenia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Age-related Osteoporosis and Cataract Extraction. On 12/5/23 at 10:04 AM, R5 was observed in bathroom located in day room on the fifth floor. The bathroom door was cracked and Surveyor observed R5 inside of the bathroom shaving with a manual cartridge razor. No staff members were observed in or near the bathroom with R5. On 12/5/23 at 10:10 AM, Surveyor observed V10 (Certified Nurse Assistant /CNA) enter the bathroom with R5 to retrieve the razor. On 12/06/2023 V1, (Administrator) said, The residents cannot shave themselves. We (staff) have to shave them (residents) or stand near and supervise them while they are shaving for safety reasons. There are no orders for shaving. Everyone has the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5 percent for 2 of 7 residents (R119, R3) reviewed for medication administration. There were 33 opportunities and 3 errors resulting in a 9.09% medication administration error rate. Findings include: R3's diagnosis includes but are not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified, unsteadiness on feet, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, abnormal posture, unspecified lack of coordination, hyperlipidemia, unspecified, anemia, unspecified, bipolar disorder, unspecified, pure hypercholesterolemia, unspecified, essential (primary) hypertension, history of falling, vitamin deficiency, unspecified, osteoarthritis of hip, unspecified , unspecified asthma, uncomplicated, schizophrenia, unspecified, muscle weakness (generalized), and altered mental status, unspecified. R3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 10/31/2023 documents R3 has a BIMS score of 13 which indicates R3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that expired eye medication was removed from the medication cart for one resident (R54) from a sample of 44. Findings include: R54 is [AGE] year old with diagnosis including but not limited to: Primary Open- Angle Glaucoma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hyperlipidemia, and Schizoaffective Disorder. On [DATE] during investigation, Surveyor observed an expired eye medication on the third floor medication cart. The expired eye medication was Latanoprost .005% and was labeled with R54's name. The Latanoprost medication had a sticker on the bottle that documented, use by [DATE]. On [DATE] at 10:50 AM, V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ LPN) said, The medication (eye drops) expired on [DATE]. I (V12) will discard this and reorder a new one. Surveyor inquired about the possible outcomes of a resident using expired eye medication. On [DATE] at 10:50 AM, V12 (LPN) said, The expired medication may cause adverse (unfavorable) effects for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents had a privacy curtain which extended around the bed. This failure affected three residents (R110, R421, R4) (residing in the same room) in a sample of 44 residents. Findings include: R110's diagnosis includes but are not limited to other drug induced secondary parkinsonism, supraventricular tachycardia, unspecified, extrapyramidal and movement disorder, unspecified, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, vitamin D deficiency, unspecified, schizoaffective disorder, unspecified, disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified, acquired absence of left great toe, acquired absence of other left toe(s), bipolar disorder, unspecified, essential (primary) hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, other lack of coordination, history of falling, thrombocytopenia, unspecified. R110's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 11/06/2023 documents R110 has a BIMS score of 12 which indicates R110 has some moderate cognitive impairment. R4's diagnosis includes but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their fall protocol by failing to re-assess a resident after a fall and failed to implement care plan interventions for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: R1's medical record (Face Sheet) documents R1 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on 5.25.2022 with diagnoses including but not limited to: Epilepsy, Bipolar Disorder, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Lack of Coordination, and Difficulty in Walking. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set of 7-7-2023) documents R1 is moderately cognitively impaired and experiences hallucinations and exhibits delusions. On 9-30-2023 at 12:05 PM, R1 was observed awake and alert sitting on the side of her bed eating lunch. A soft helmet was noted on R1's head; a CAM (controlled ankle movement) boot was noted on R1's left lower extremity. There were no floor mats noted on the floor in front of resident's bed. On 9-30-2023 at 3:55 PM, V8 (Restorative Supervisor) said, fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurately documented medical records for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for documentation of medical records. Findings include: On 10-2-2023 at 11:39 AM, via return phone call by V19 (Agency LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) to Surveyor, V19 said, I wasn't there when R1 had a seizure. PT (Physical Therapy) and CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) said there was something off about R1. That's when they said she may have had a seizure and fell. I assessed her; there was a difference in size between her ankles, the left ankle was swollen, larger than the right. The seizure happened somewhere before my shift started on the midnight shift. She wasn't experiencing excruciating pain, there was no obvious deformity to extremity noted. I tried to look back on 24-hour report, I didn't see anything in the communication book about a seizure. The off-going nurse never reported to me that R1 had a seizure on the midnight shift. V20 (Agency LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse) was not available for interview (overseas per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to label food items with open date, failed to maintain daily refrigerator and freezer temperature logs, and failed to store food 6 inches off the floor in effort to prevent foodborne illness. These failures have the potential to affect all 111 residents receiving oral nourishment in the facility. Findings include: The (02/05/2023) facility census was 111. The (02/08/2023) email correspondence with V1 (Administrator) documented, in part There are currently no NPO (nothing per mouth) residents. On 02/05/2023 at 9:23 am, the last entry on the reach-in Vegetable Freezer and reach-in Milk Cooler temperature logs in the kitchen was on 02/02/2023. This surveyor pointed out the observation to V5 (Cook). V5 checked the logs and stated, The last entry is 2/2/23. Purpose of checking the temperature is to ensure refrigerated food items are stored properly. On 02/05/2023 at 9:25am, inside the reach-in Vegetable Freezer, there were 3 sandwiches that were not dated. V5 stated, We (facility) are supposed to have a date on these.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the outside dumpster's were closed and failed to ensure construction dumpster has no kitchen refuse in an effort to prevent pest and rodents from entering into the facility. These failures have the potential to affect all 111 residents in the facility. Findings include. On 02/06/2023 at 9:00 am, there were 2 outside dumpster's that were overflowing with trash and were open. There was a big dumpster close to the smoking patio that had food refuse and had no cover. On 02/06/2023 at 9:31 am, this surveyor pointed out to V15 (Maintenance Supervisor) the two dumpsters overflowing with trash and were open. V15 stated, The trash guys are coming anytime to pick them up (garbage). It (dumpster's) is supposedly not open like that. It can attract pest and come to the facility. On 02/06/2023 at 9:33 am, this surveyor also pointed out to V15 the big dumpster close to the smoking patio with food refuse. V15 stated, That's our construction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement safeguards and systems, to ensure records are accurately maintained and a periodic reconciliation is conducted, for controlled medications stored in one of one medication carts on the sixth floor. Findings include: On 2/07/2023 at 11:23 am, surveyor observed the Controlled Drugs-Count Record for February 2023 with blank boxes for 02/04/2023 2nd shift (4pm-12 midnight) and 3rd shift (12 midnight-8:00am); 02/05/2023 1st shift (8:00am-4:00pm) and 2nd shift; 2/06/2023 1st shift (8:00am-4:00pm) and 2/07/2023 first shift (8:00am-4:00pm). On 2/07/2023 at 11:30 am, V9 stated, Controlled Drugs-Count Record should be completed (initialed) at the start and end of every shift and the purpose of the form to confirm that the narc count is accurate and correct. On 2/07/2023 at 2:52 pm, V2 (DON) stated that the nurses are supposed to sign the Controlled Drugs-Count Record at the beginning and end of the shift on a daily basis. Policy titled Medication and Narcotic Storage with an updated date of 1/04/2023 states, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-08 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that handrail on the 2nd floor was firmly secured to the wall. This failure has the potential to affect all 26 residents on the second floor. Findings include: The (02/05/2023) resident census in 2nd floor was 26. On 02/05/23 at 10:39 AM, the handrail between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was not secured to the wall. On 02/05/23 at 10:40 AM, this observation was pointed out to V14 (Maintenance Director). V14 checked the handrail and stated, The screw is coming out. This surveyor inquired if the handrail is safe for the resident to use. V14 stated, No. On 02/05/23 at 11:10 AM, this surveyor pointed out the observation to V17 (Behavior Coordinator Supervisor) and inquired if it was safe for resident to use the handrail. V17 stated, No, because it is loose. The residents could have fallen if they (residents) use it. The (undated) Maintenance Department documented, in part Policy. It is the policy of the maintenance department to provide for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to enter a do not resuscitate (DNR) code status order under the physician orders which affected one resident (R1) in a sample of 45 residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year old female with diagnosis including but not limited to: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Unspecified dementia, schizoaffective disorder, epilepsy, hypothyroidism, and dysphagia. R1's MDS (Minimal Data Sheet) - Section C, BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is documented 0 which indicates severe cognitive impairment. On 02/06/23 at 12:53 pm, during record review, R1's Order Summary Report documents R1's active orders as of 02/05/2023. An active order for 'Full Code' was noted in R1's Physician orders dated 12/16/20. Subsequently, R1's EHR (electronic hospital record) profile read, Full Code as well. On 02/07/23 at 09:51 am, R1's POLST (Practitioner Order for Life- Sustaining Treatment) form was received from V1 (Administrator),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a resident's injury of unknown source (left ankle fractures) to the state agency which affected one resident (R165) in the sample of 45 residents. Findings include: R165's admission Record, documents, in part, that R165's diagnoses include COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and Schizoaffective disorder. R165's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents, in part, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicates that R165 is cognitively intact. This surveyor reviewed the facility's incident reports sent to the state agency from April 2022 to February 2023 with one report (initial on 12/18/22 and final on 12/22/22) noted for R165. On 2/6/23 at 11:12 am, V10 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) stated that on 12/18/22, V10 was at the nurse's station and that R165 was walking out of R165's room then fell to the floor. V10 stated that V10 then ran to R165 and V25 (Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA) was already…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was supervised while smoking. This affected one resident (R32) in the sample of 45 residents reviewed for smoking. Findings include: R32 is [AGE] year old female with diagnosis of but not limited to: nicotine dependence, epilepsy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, cognitive communication deficit and schizophrenia. R32's MDS (Minimal Data Sheet), Section C - documents a BIMS score (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 13, which indicates cognitively intact. On 02/06/2023 at 10:28am, surveyor observed R32 with several large holes on the front of R32's coat. Surveyor asked R32 about the holes in R32's coat. R32 stated, I had an accident with my cigarette. R32's Clinical Care Plan dated 4/11/2022 reads, Resident is at risk for ineffective health maintenance related to lack of interest in improving health behavior as evidenced by verbal report and resident's continued desire to smoke . Goal: Resident will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date opened multi-dose medications with open and expiration dates and discard expired eye drops for 3 residents (R9, R36 and R58), residing on the 3rd and 6th floor. This failure has the potential to affect 23 residents residing on the 3rd floor and 22 residents residing on the 6th floor. Findings include: On [DATE] at 11:15 am, surveyor observed R36's Timolol Malaete Solution 0.5% with no expiration date. On [DATE] at 11:16 am, surveyor observed R9's Latanoprost sol 0.005% with a label that states, Do not use after [DATE]. On [DATE] at 11:19 surveyor asked V9 (LPN) what R9's label says. V9 said, Do not use after [DATE] and No, this is February and we should not use after the date on the label. V9 also stated that R9's eyedrops should have a Do Not Use date too. On [DATE] at about 12:15 pm, surveyor observed R58's Latanoprost Emulsion 0.005% with a label that stated Do Not Use after [DATE]. On [DATE] at 12:20 pm, V33 said, No, it should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$123,614 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $8,978 — penalty dated 2024-11-20
- $114,636 — penalty dated 2024-09-23
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRIDGET STUMPF GIFT DESCENDANTS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 16% | since 11/20/2013 |
| CAITLIN O'BRIEN GIFT DESCENDANTS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 11/27/2013 |
| CHARLES F STUMPF, JR. GIFT DESCENDANTS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 16% | since 11/20/2013 |
| MEGHAN O'BRIEN GIFT DESCENDANTS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 11/27/2013 |
| PETER J O'BRIEN, SR GIFT DESCENDANTS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 37% | since 11/23/2013 |
| REENIE O'BRIEN GIFT DESCENDANTS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 11/27/2013 |
| O'BRIEN, PETER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/1991 |
| GULLY, JACQUELINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/15/2025 |
| SHAH, BHARAT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/05/2003 |
| VILORIA, RENITH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/12/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146191. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.