Norwood Crossing
6016 North Nina Avenue, Chicago, IL 60631 · Non profit - Corporation · 131 certified beds · (773) 631-4856 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $40,474 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-26)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.8% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.7% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.5% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.4% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.6% | 18.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 35.4% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.0% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 2.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.7% | 63.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.5% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.19 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.30 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 219 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 116 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.8%CMS range 45.5–57.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 7.5–13.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.9%CMS range 6.3–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.51 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 131 beds and averages 108.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.40 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.50 to 1.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise one resident (R1) who was a high risk for falls. This failure resulted in R1 falling to the floor and sustaining a broken clavicle. This failure affected one of three residents reviewed for falls.Findings include:R1's diagnoses include but are not limited to epilepsy, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy, dementia.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating R1's cognition is moderately impaired. R1's progress note dated 02/25/26 at 5:39pm documents in part, Late Entry: Root cause: Poor safety awareness.R1's rehab progress note dated 02/20/26 documents in part, Chief complaint: mobility and ADL (Activities of Daily Living) dysfunction. Picking up object = partial/moderate assistance.R1's progress note dated 02/25/26 at 11:47pm documents in part, Resident noted laying on the floor, on her back in front of the nurse station. Upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident [R5] who is a high fall risk out of three residents reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in R5 experiencing an unwitnessed fall and sustaining an acute nondisplaced fracture of the L5 superior endplate with extension to the left L5 transverse process (Lumbar Fracture). Findings Include, R5 clinical record indicate in part; R5 is a sixty-nine year old with the Medical diagnosis includes but not limited to malignant neoplasm of right main bronchus, secondary malignant neoplasm of brain, severe protein calorie malnutrition, atrial fibrillation, osseous and subluxation, major depressive disorder, wedge compression fracture of fifth lumbar vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, need for assistance with personal care, malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of unspecified bronchus or lung , adult failure to thrive, and presence of left artificial hip joint. R5's minimum data set section [C] dated 11/27/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to obtain monthly weights and recognize, evaluate, and address weight loss for three (R17, R66, and R61) residents out of a total sample of 22 residents. This failure resulted in R17 having a 15.7 percent decrease in weight in six months between 12/4/2023 (121 pounds) and 6/4/2024 (102 pounds). Findings include: 1. On 6/11/2024 at 10:48 AM and at 1:26 PM, R17 was observed sleeping in bed with an intravenous (IV) in the left hand and 0.9 percent Dextrose with Sodium Chloride running at a rate of eighty milliliters per hour. On 06/11/24 at 2:47 PM V9 (Registered Nurse) stated that R17 felt weak, threw up and had diarrhea the morning of 6/11/2024. R17's blood pressure was also low. V9 called the doctor who ordered intravenous (IV) fluid. R17 was interviewed and stated that she was dizzy the morning of 6/11/2024. R17 stated I don't like the food here. R17 stated that she felt better after receiving the IV fluid and resting. On 06/11/24 at 03:17 PM R17's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to follow their fall policy by failing to develop and implement indivualized fall prevention interventions for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls on the sample list of three. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a closed displaced fracture of the left femoral neck requiring surgical intervention. Findings Include: R1's clinical record documents: R1's medical diagnosis of displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavior disturbances, anxiety, essential hypertension, unsteadiness on feet, reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, and history of falling. R1's minimum data set [MDS] assessment Brief Interview Mental Status score= 99, which indicates R1 is severely cognitively impaired. R1's MDS section G documents R1 is total dependence for self-performance. Surface to surface transfer R1 is not steady, only able to stabilize with staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed the facility failed to ensure one resident (R1) remained free from verbal and physical sexual abuse from a resident (R2) who had a history of inappropriate sexual behavior with another resident (R3) prior. This failure affected three of three residents reviewed for abuse on the sample list of five. Findings include: On 1/14/26 the facility reported an incident involving R1 and R2 on 1/14/26. R1 reported to staff he was in bed when R2 approached him, made inappropriate verbal comments and placed his (R2's) hand over R1's upper leg. R1 said he told R2 he did not want to engage in this type of interaction.R1 is [AGE] year old male with diagnosis, including but not limited to Difficulty Walking, Muscle Atrophy, Weakness, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Blindness, Symptoms and Signs Involving Cognitive Functions and Awareness, and Major Depressive Disorder.R2 was [AGE] year old male with diagnosis (prior to incident), including but not limited to Peripheral Autonomic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency. This failure affects two of three residents (R2/R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of five. Findings include: R2's progress notes dated 12/5/25 written by V2 states writer notified residents attempted to touch another male inappropriately while both in the common area. Staff observed resident reaching towards other male resident leg and groin area. Staff noticed due to resident's distress and intervened. R2 proceeded to attempt multiple times after that. Writer notified administrator, POA, physician, and supervisor.On 5/1/26 at 1:08PM R3 observed in the dining room, in a wheelchair, has assistive devices for support of right leg and upper right body. Interviewed R3 in his room. R3 answers yeah, smiles, gives audible laughter for most responses can give thumbs up, shakes head left to right to say no. Noted facial expressions change depending on question. R3 says yes and visibly smiles when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for one resident (R3). This failure affects two of three residents (R2/R3) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of five. Findings include: R2's progress notes dated 12/5/25 written by V2 states writer notified residents attempted to touch another male inappropriately while both in the common area. Staff observed resident reaching towards other male resident leg and groin area. Staff noticed due to resident's distress and intervened. R2 proceeded to attempt multiple times after that. Writer notified administrator, POA, physician, and supervisor.On 5/1/26 at 1:08PM R3 observed in the dining room, in a wheelchair, has assistive devices for support of right leg and upper right body. Interviewed R3 in his room. R3 answers yeah, smiles, gives audible laughter for most responses can give thumbs up, shakes head left to right to say no. Noted facial expressions change depending on question. R3 says yes and visibly smiles…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have an effective pest control program by having gnats flying around residents room and kitchen area. This failure has the potential to affect all 107 of the residents in the facility. Finding includes:On 03/30/2026 at 9:05 am, the other surveyor at facility stated she observed gnats in the hallway flying around upon her entrance to the facility, surveyor had to swat the gnats away to avoid the gnat from touching her face.On 03/30/2026 at 10:22 AM, V3 (MDS coordinator) stated she has seen a few gnats in her office. V3 stated her office is on the second floor in the office building, I have only been working here for the last three weeks.On 03/30/2026 at 11:00 AM,V4 (Cook) stated he has seen gnats flying around in the kitchen everywhere, and I am not sure what will help with get rid of the gnats.On 03/30/2026 at 11:03 AM, V5(Cook ) stated he has worked here for a year now and previously observed gnats flying around daily we use to use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to a.) provide adequate supervision and monitoring for fall risk residents and b.) follow their policy to ensure accident prevention measures were in place by not ensuring a dependable locking mechanism on a soiled utility room door. These failures affect R22, R34, R55, R60, R63, R67 and all residents residing on the second floor. Findings include: 1.On 07/22/2025 at 10:37AM, inside the solarium (identified as the fourth-floor dining room) R22, R34, R55, R60, R63, and R67 were observed sitting inside of the fourth-floor dining room unsupervised and unattended. R55, and R22 were sitting in wheelchairs. R34, R60, R63, and R67 were sitting in geriatric chairs. R63, R22, and R60 observed with seat pad alarms in their seats. On 07/22/2025 at 10:38AM, V7 (Registered Nurse/RN) walks inside of the dining room and administers medications to a resident and exits the dining room at 10:39AM leaving the residents unsupervised and unattended again. All six residents were unsupervised and unattended until 10:42AM, when two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to provide medication in compliance with standards of professional practice for five residents (R19, R32, R39, R58, R77) out of 7 residents reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 24 residents.Findings include: On 07/22/2025 at 10:11AM, V4 (registered nurse) during medication administration, V4 had 5 residents (R19, R32, R39, R58, R77) that did not receive their scheduled 9:00 AM medications. Per the standards of professional practice, scheduled medications may be administered one hour before or one hour after of the medication schedule and are considered late when given more then an hour past the scheduled time. On 07/24/2025 at 10:12 AM, V4 (registered nurse) stated, I have 5 residents remaining to administer medications to. Per the standards of practice, you have one hour before the scheduled time and an hour after the scheduled time to pass the medications. Anything after one hour past the scheduled medication time is considered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice by failing to label medications when opened; and (b) failing to label medications with an expiration date an (c) dispose of expired medical supplies. This failure affects residents receiving medications from the second and third floor medication cart. Finding Include: On [DATE] at 10:43 AM, during a certification and licensure survey, the surveyor audited the 2nd floor odd side Medication Cart with V26 (registered nurse). The surveyor found: a bottle of R17's Humalog insulin vial with an open date of [DATE] and no marked date when the medication expires; a bottle of Gas Relief (Simethicone) 100 chewable tablets with no marked date when the medication was opened and no marked date of when the medication expires; a bottle of Vitamin B-12 1000mcg (micrograms) 130 tablets with no marked date when the medication was opened and no marked date of when the medication expires; a bottle of Vitamin D 50mcg 100 tablets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to practice infection control and prevention and ensure the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn by staff caring for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions. This failure affects one (R6) reviewed for infection control on the sample of 24. Findings include: On 07/22/2025 at 1:20PM, surveyor located on the fourth floor of the facility and observes a sign posted on R6's door that reads in part Enhanced Barrier Precautions Everyone Must: clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff must also: wear gloves and gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities. Dressing, Bathing/Showering, Transferring, Changing Linens, Providing Hygiene, changing briefs or assisting with toileting. Do not wear the same gown and gloves for the care of more than one person. On 07/22/2025 at 1:21PM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) observed inside of R6's room providing incontinence care and changing R6's diaper. V14 is observed without a gown on and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care was provided for dependent residents who required assistance with bladder and bowel incontinence for one of one resident (R56) reviewed for ADL care in the sample of 24. Findings include:R56's face sheet documents resident is an [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Lack of Coordination, and Muscle Weakness.R56's MDS (Minimum Data Set, 7.16.2025) documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15 denoting R56 is cognitively intact. R56's MDS documents a functional status of 1 for toileting hygiene/toilet transfer denoting R56 is dependent-helper does ALL of the effort. Resident does not complete the activity. The assistance of 2 or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity.R56 's bowel and bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 1:1 feeding assistance in a timely manner for one (R2) resident out of seven residents in a total sample of 24. Findings include: On 07/23/2025 at 12:31 PM, R2 lying in bed, awake, head of the bed slightly elevated. R2 stated in Spanish si, yes, when asked if he wanted to eat. When asked in Spanish if he ate, R2 stated no. R2's meal contents on the food tray is untouched, uneaten, and was sitting at R2's overhead bedside table.On 07/23/2025 at 12:40 PM, V22 (Certified Nursing Assistant/orientee) sitting on a chair, touching screen on the wall. On 07/23/2025 at 12:43 PM, R2's food tray is still untouched, uneaten sitting at R2's overhead bedside table.On 07/23/2025 at 12:46 PM, V20 (Certified Nursing Assistant) walked into R2's room. V20 stated that she will be changing R2's incontinence brief at this time and after will provide feeding assistance to R2. V20 stated that V20 was feeding another resident prior to attending to R2. V20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a pressure relieving device was functioning properly for one (R20) who is at risk for pressure ulcers out of seven residents in a total sample of 24.Findings include:On 07/22/2025 at 11:39 AM, R20 lying in bed, wearing a hospital gown, asleep, and in no apparent distress. R20's bed with an air loss mattress and the machine pump (electronic controller). The display screen on the pump (electronic controller) is dark, no items displayed, and no sound heard from the air mattress pump noted. R20's mattress appeared/felt slightly flat and lumpy. The air mattress pump (electronic controller) model noted. On 07/22/2025 at 11:47 AM, V15 (Infection Prevention) pressed the lock button, on and off button on the air mattress pump (electronic controller) but nothing appeared on the screen. V15 stated the pump should be on, it is probably locked. Let me go get the person in charge of handling the mattress pump. On 07/22/2025 at 11:51 AM, V6 (Restorative Nurse/Fall Coordinator) pressed a lot of the buttons on the air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at bedside for one (R2) resident and failed to ensure a treatment cart was locked when not in visual proximity of the nurse and not in use. This failure has the potential to affect all 36-residents residing on the 4th floor of the facility. Findings include: 1. On 02/24/25 at approximately 11:12am, R2 noted in bed, on the cabinet in the room a bottle of Fluocinonide topical solution with instruction to apply to scalp topically@ bedtime with a pharmacy label to Avoid contact with eyes. In addition, a tube of Econazole nitrate cream 1% left on the table. When V4 ADON (Assistant Director of Nurse's) was shown and was asked about the facility policy/protocol on medication storage at the bedside. V4 stated no medicine should be left at bedside without an order (referring to physician order) but let me check if there is an order to leave at the bedside. V4 then took the medications to V5 RN (Registered Nurse) assigned to R2. Both V4, V5 and the surveyor checked the EPO (Electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly log refrigerator and freezer temperatures in the facility kitchen; and failed to properly log the checking of the dating and labeling of food items and removal of expired items in the facility kitchen. These failures have the potential to affect all 104 residents receiving an oral diet in the facility. Findings include: On 02/19/25 at 12:06pm, with V4 (Director of Dietary Services), during observation of the facility's main walk-in freezer, walk-in refrigerators (coolers), and Ice Cream freezer, the following was observed: 1. The walk-in freezer's temperature log titled, Freezer/Refrigerator Temperatures, dated February 2025, documents, in part, -10 degrees Fahrenheit on 2/20/25 AM shift. This was observed on 2/19/25 which indicates the temperature of the walk-in freezer was documented for a future date. 2. The Ice Cream freezer's temperature log titled, Freezer/Refrigerator Temperatures (with the word Ice cream written at the top right corner of the document), dated February 2025, documents, in part,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R1) was treated in a dignified manner. This failure affected one resident (R1) out of four residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: On 02/19/25 at 11:36am V6 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated that she placed signs on R1's wall to remind other nurses to change R1's wound dressing. On 02/19/25 at 11:50am observed 3 handwritten paper signs taped to walls in various locations of R1's room. Signs document in part, 7-3 shift nurse: AM (morning) nurse please do wound care dressing on left lower leg on Tuesday and Saturday mornings. Resident will call DON (Director of Nursing)/Supervisor if it's not being done!! Foot doctor do not do resident dressing or his wound. On 02/20/25 at 11:40am, V3 (DON) stated that instructions should not be posted on resident walls because of confidentiality not so much dignity. Facility's policy dated 12/2024, titled Dignity documents in part, Policy and Procedure: 1. Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times .10. Staff are to follow HIPAA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R1) with a venous stasis ulcer received the necessary treatment and services to promote wound healing. This failure affected one resident (R1) out of four residents reviewed for wound care. Findings include: R1's medical diagnoses include but are not limited to myositis, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, nonrheumatic aortic stenosis, non-pressure chronic ulcer of unspecified part of left lower leg, muscle weakness, peripheral vascular disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] has a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicates R1's cognition is intact. R1's care plan dated 11/13/24 documents in part, R1 at risk for pressure ulcer/skin breakdown due to impaired mobility and bilateral leg edema. Bilateral lower leg venous statis ulcers .Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. R1's physician orders dated with a start date of 12/14/24 documents in part, Left heel apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to label, and date stored food, failed to discard expired food, and failed to store food items separate from cleaning products. These failures have the potential to affect 106 residents in the facility who is receiving an oral diet. The facility's Tally sheet documents 109 residents in the facility with 3 being NPO [nothing by mouth]. Findings include: On 6/11/24 at 8:55 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen with V8 [Food Service Director] the following was observed in the walk-in refrigerator/Dairy cooler: [NAME] container of egg salad half filled with no date On 6/11/24 at 9:04 AM the following items were observed in the walk-in freezer: Open to air plastic bag of bread sticks, no date of open or expire, open to air plastic bag of French Fries no date, open to air box of corn of the cob no date, open to air plastic bag of pepperoni no date, plastic bag of shrimp half filled with no date and open loose bag with a personal pan pizza no date. On 6/11/24 at 9:07AM, V8 stated, I will discard these items, all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain enhanced barrier precautions for three residents (R28, R64, R78), failed to educate visitors on contract isolation precautions for one resident (R166), failed to maintain suction equipment within professional standards of practice for one resident (R78) and failed to annually update policies relative to infection prevention and control. This failure has the potential to affect the entire facility census of one hundred and nine residents. Findings Include: On 6/11/2024 at 2:34 PM R78 had an EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) sign on the door. V10 (Registered Nurse) entered R78's room without performing hand hygiene and touched R78's suction equipment. On 6/11/2024 at 2:42 PM R78 had an EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) sign on the door. V10 (Registered Nurse) entered R78's room without performing hand hygiene and changed the suction cannister. On 06/11/24 at 1:33 PM R78's suction tubing was observed on the bedside table with the suction catheter open and in the packaging. V10 (Registered Nurse) was at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure to ensure proper linens were used on the low air loss mattress for 2 residents (R1, R63) and to ensure low air loss mattress devices were functioning and on the correct settings for 2 (R61, R90) out of 4 dependent residents who are at risk in developing pressure ulcer in a final sample of 22 residents. Findings Include: 1. On 6/11/24 at 11:05 AM, R61 was sleeping in bed and noted low air loss mattress weight control knob was set between 287 and 375 pounds. R61's clinical records show R61 has diagnoses not limited to Alzheimer's Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. R61's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R61 is cognitively impaired and is dependent on staff for turning and repositioning in bed. R61's care plan with review completed on 5/6/24 shows R61 had a history of having sacral pressure ulcer and requires an air loss mattress as one intervention. R61's current weight documents as 134 pounds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure (R54) residents' oxygen was on the correct setting as ordered by the physician, ensure (R4) residents' oxygen tubing was connected and functioning properly, ensure (R41, R54, R60) residents oxygen supplies were labeled and dated per the facilities policy and ensure (R41, R60, R70) residents respiratory supplies were stored to prevent contamination in a sample of 22. Findings Include: R4 has diagnosis not limited to Heart Failure, Depressive Episodes, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypertensive Heart Disease, Personal History of Transient Ischemic Attack and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Care Plan document in part: R4 has COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). The resident will display optimal breathing pattern daily through review date. 04/09/24 2L O2 via NC (nasal canula) to keep O2 > 92%. Give oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician. Monitor for s/sx (signs/symptoms) of acute respiratory insufficiency: Anxiety, Confusion, Restlessness, SOB at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to label a personal use medication (R8), discard medications past the 'Best By date,' discard open medications not in their original packaging and return discontinued medications (R15). This has the potential to affect R8 and all residents that receive medications from the fourth floor, odd side, medication cart. Findings include: On [DATE] at 11:45 AM, surveyor reviewed the fourth floor, odd side, medication cart with V9 (Nurse). On the first drawer, there was an open bottle of Multivitamin with Minerals with a stamped Best By 4/24. V9 stated using the medications from the bottle that morning. On the top section of the first drawer there were two unknown, loose, green tablets at the bottom of the drawer. The tablets were out of their original packaging. On [DATE] at 12:05 PM, surveyor reviewed the controlled medications bin with V9. There was a blister pack of Alprazolam 0.25 milligram for R15. The seals for pill slots 28 and 29 were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was self-administering medications had a self-administration of medications assessment, a physician's order, and a care plan completed for 1 (R54) resident reviewed for self-administration of medications in a sample of 22. Findings Include: R54 has diagnosis not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation, Acute on Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation, Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Muscle Weakness, Difficulty in Walking, Need For Assistance with Personal Care, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease, Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker, Patient's Noncompliance with other Medical Treatment and Regimen for other Reason. Order Summary Report dated 06/12/24 document in part: Spiriva Respimat Inhalation Aerosol Solution 2.5 MCG (microgram)/ACT (Tiotropium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the provider order and care plan reflected the resident's wishes on the Provider Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form for one residents (R78) out of twenty-two total residents in the sample. Findings: On [DATE] at 12:57 PM the electronic medical record of R78 was reviewed. The Provider Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for R78 dated [DATE] stated: Section A: Do Not Attempt Resuscitation/Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). Section B: Selective Treatment: Primary goal of treating medical conditions with selected medical measures. In addition to treatment described in comfort-focused treatment, use medical treatment, intravenous (IV) fluids and IV medications (may include antibiotics and vasopressors) as medically appropriate and consistent with patient preference. Do not intubate. May consider less invasive airway support (e.g. CPAP, BiPAP) Transfer to hospital, if indicated. Generally avoid the intensive care unit. On [DATE] V30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders and update a resident's (R14) care plan for one resident out of a total sample of 22 residents. Findings include: R14's Order Summary Report documents in part: Regular diet Regular texture, Regular / thin consistency, for 1:1 assist. Order date and start date listed as 4/17/2024. R14's care plan documents in part that R14 is at risk for alteration in nutrition related to diagnosis of cellulitis, blindness, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, small bowel obstruction, metabolic encephalopathy, and significant, unplanned weight loss (last revised 5/28/2024). Intervention last revised 5/28/2024 documents in part to provide necessary assistance at mealtimes and between meals. R14's care plan also documents in part that R14 has an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit due to decreased activities of daily living, decreased functional transfers and balance, deceased activity intolerance, left eye blindness with right eye visual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to apply splint and complete quarterly restorative assessments that detail the progress or lack of progress in the restorative services for 1 (R61) out of 1 resident reviewed for limited range of motion and restorative services in the final sample of 22. Findings Include: On 6/11/24 at 11:07 AM, R61 was sleeping in bed. Surveyor noted R61 has both hands contractures, and no assistive devices/splints were in place. On 6/12/24 at 2:23 PM, interviewed V22 (Wound Care Nurse/Restorative Nurse Supervisor) and stated that R61 is on active and passive range of motion restorative programs. V22 stated that R61 is supposed to have a splint for the contracted hand. V22 stated, I forgot which hand. [R61] should always have it every day except during incontinence care or when bathing. Restorative assessment should be completed quarterly. Surveyor and V22 reviewed R61's electronic health records (EHR) and found that the last restorative assessment completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled, dated, and stored and failed to store equipment in separate area from bulk food bins. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 112 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 08/08/23 at 9:19 AM, during initial kitchen tour, V14 (Food Service Director) stated all opened food items need to be labeled and dated with a delivery date, an open date, and an expiration date. V14 stated labeling and dating food items are important, so the staff knows how and when to rotate them. On 08/08/23 at 9:23 AM, observed in the facility walk-in dairy refrigerator an opened 1-gallon container of Fat Free Skim Milk with sell by date of 08/03/23. The plastic milk carton was not labeled with a delivery or opened date. V14 stated the milk was expired and should be thrown out. On 08/08/23 at 9:28 AM, observed the following items in the walk-in fruit/vegetable/meat refrigerator: Opened 1 gallon container of Ranch Dressing dated with delivery…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure dependent residents requiring 1:1 feeding were treated with respect and dignity by not being fed simultaneously with the other residents. These failures affected 4 residents (R8, R42, R78, R96) reviewed during dining observations in a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: 1) R96 has diagnosis not limited to Subluxation of C1/C2 Cervical Vertebrae, Acute Kidney Failure, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Dementia with Agitation, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, Major Depressive Disorder, Insomnia, Vitamin D Deficiency, Dysphagia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Need for Assistance with Personal Care and Psychosis. R96's Order Summary Report dated 08/09/23 documents in part: Regular diet, Pureed texture, Regular/thin consistency, 1:1 Feeding Assistance with meals. R96's Care Plan document in part: R96 is at nutritional risk. Intervention Provide diet as prescribed: Regular, puree texture, thin liquids, 1:1 feeding assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure shared equipment was cleaned and decontaminated between each use for four [R28, R65, R81, R105] of seven residents reviewed for medication administration observation on the total sample of 23. Findings included: On 8/8/23 at 9:37 AM, medication pass was observed with V9 [Registered Nurse]. There was a blood pressure machine on top on the medication cart. V9 placed the blood pressure machine on R105's lap and obtained R105's blood pressure on the right arm [114/53, pulse 64]. V9 did not clean the blood pressure machine before or after use. On 8/8/23 at 9:50 AM, V9 place the blood pressure machine on R81, and obtained R81's blood pressure [114/76, pulse 86]. V9 did not clean the blood pressure machine before or after use. On 8/8/23 at 10:06 AM, V9 placed the blood pressure machine on the dining room table and obtained R28's blood pressure [135/76 pulse 71]. V9 used a pulse oximeter finger device on R28's finger [97% oxygen and pulse 70]. V9 did not clean the blood pressure machine or pulse oximeter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for 1 (R65) of 23 residents reviewed for call lights on the total sample of 23. Findings Include: R65 has diagnosis not limited to Metabolic Encephalopathy, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Unspecified Complications, Acute Kidney Failure, Dementia, Muscle Weakness, Difficulty in Walking and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Care Plan document in part: R65 is at risk for falls d/t (Due/to) impaired mobility, Gait/balance problems, Dementia, and incontinence. Intervention: Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. On 08/08/23 at 11:20 AM R65 was lying in bed on a low air loss mattress. R65 call light was wrapped around and hanging from the left upper side rail touching the floor. When R65 was asked the location of her call light? R65 responded, I don't know where the call light is. On 08/08/23 at 11:22 AM V9 (Registered Nurse) entered R65's room. When asked the location of R65's call light, V9 approach…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an air mattress used for pressure reduction was on and operating while the resident was in bed, for one (R23) of four residents reviewed for wound prevention in a sample of 23. Findings Include: R23 has diagnosis not limited to Fracture of Superior Rim of Right Pubis, Chronic Obstructive pulmonary Disease, Major Depressive Disorder and Dementia. Care Plan document in part R23 is at risk for pressure ulcer/skin breakdown d/t (Due/to) impaired mobility, right pelvic fracture, and incontinence. Intervention: Air mattress in place. Order Summary report dated 08/09/23 document in part: Air mattress. On 08/08/23 at 10:33 AM R23 was lying in bed asleep on a low air loss mattress the was not on and operating. R23 was sunken in the middle of the air mattress. On 08/08/23 at 10:38 AM V7 (Registered Nurse) entered R23's room. V7 was asked if R23's low air loss mattress was on and operating. V7 responded it was on when I came in here earlier. It may have gotten loose a little bit ago. V7 tuned on the low air loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy by not administering oxygen per physician's orders and not storing oxygen tubing in a protective plastic bag when not in use for 2 (R5, R98) residents reviewed for respiratory care out on a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: 1) R5's face sheet documents in part medical diagnoses of COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and emphysema. R5's comprehensive care plan contains a focus for R5's diagnoses of COPD and emphysema. Intervention created 1/13/2023 documents in part to give oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician. R5's physicians' order sheets contain an active order dated 5/05/2023 that documents in part oxygen 2L (liters) continuously via nasal cannula every shift for shortness of breath. On 8/08/2023 at 10:43 AM, R5 was lying in bed and breathing with mouth open. Nasal cannula was on R5's face. The end of the tubing was on the floor at the head of the bed. Oxygen concentrator was turned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$40,474 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $12,628 — penalty dated 2025-01-26
- $27,846 — penalty dated 2024-06-14
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-28 for 52 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-18 for 9 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| NORWOOD LIFE CARE SOCIETY | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2006 |
| BENJAMIN, FRED | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/01/2025 |
| BRAME, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/01/2025 |
| RAPOSO, MANUEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/01/2025 |
| OAKDALE SENIORS ALLIANCE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/25/2026 |
| D'SOUZA, GODWIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2019 |
| MATHENY, CYNTHIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| TAYLOR, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/26/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145974. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.