Ryze At The Ridge
6450 North Ridge Blvd, Chicago, IL 60626 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 136 certified beds · (773) 743-8700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $301,750 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-12)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.6% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.8% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 99.8% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.0% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 52.7% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.2% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.0% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 86.9% | 21.7% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.2% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.5% | 63.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.5% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 6.4–17.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 64.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 136 beds and averages 122.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.20 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to supervise (R3). A resident with criminal background history, with aggressive behaviors and non-compliant with smoking, from intentionally starting a fire to R3's roommate's bed (R4). This failure has the potential to cause serious harm or death to all 123 residents in the facility at the time of incident. The facility failed to have a system to ensure that contraband and/or hazardous devices are secured and not brought into the facility. The facility lacks a system to ensure that all residents are closely monitored. The facility lacks a system to ensure that the residents' environment is free of hazards. The facility failed to report incident to IDPH. The immediate Jeopardy began on 1/21/24 at 11:30PM when R3 set R4's bed on fire. V1 (Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing) and V11 (Corporate Nurse Consultant) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 2/27/24 at 3:29PM. On 2/28/24 at 11:09AM abatement plan submitted and not approved. On 2/28/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly assess and supervise a newly admitted resident (R2) for risk of elopement for one (R2) out of 7 residents reviewed for hazards and accidents on the sample list of 11. This failure resulted in R2 eloping from the facility through a window. R2 was subsequently found at the lake and transported to the hospital where R2 was pronounced dead by neurological criteria by ICU (Intensive Care Unit) and Neurology attending physician. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy which began on 08/30/2023 when R2 went out of a window on the second floor of the facility, eloped and was later found in a lake. R2 was transported to the hospital and pronounced dead. On 09/29/2023 at 09:38 AM V1 (Administrator) was notified of immediate jeopardy via phone call. V11 (MDS Coordinator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) were present and signed immediate jeopardy template form. V1 was not present in the facility and thus, was notified via telephone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately assess a resident (post fall), failed to follow physician's orders, and failed to provide timely hospital transfer for one of three residents (R3) reviewed for falls. These failures resulted in R3's (5/2/25) delayed care of a fall with right impacted intertrochanteric fracture - with varus deformity [an excessive inward angulation of a joint or bone's distal segment] which required surgical intervention and likely experienced excruciating pain [for roughly 33 hours - prior to transfer] which was rated 3/10 - by facility staff. Findings include: R3's diagnoses include metabolic encephalopathy and fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur. R3's (5/14/25) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 6 (severe cognitive impairment). R3's (5/14/25) functional assessment affirms resident is dependent on staff for chair/bed to chair transfer and walking was not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns. R3'S (10/2/24) fall risk evaluation determined a score of 25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-07-12 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's (R1) right to manage their financial affair and inform R1 of the charges the facility imposed against R1's personal funds. This affected one out of four residents reviewed for personal funds. This failure resulted in the facility, misusing R1's $10,000 check R1 received from family member without R1's consent. Findings include: R1 oriented to person, place, time, and situation. R1 answered questions appropriately. R1's 4/16/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment documents in part that R1 is cognitively intact with no signs and symptoms of delirium. R1's 6/20/2024 Behavioral Health Progress Note documents in part that R1 is alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. During multiple interviews with R1 on 7/09/2024 at 11:53 AM and 1:51 PM and again on 7/10/2024 10:50 AM, R1 was alert stated receiving a $10,000 check from V33's (R1's family member) estate at the beginning of the year. R1 did not know what to do with the money and approached V4 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to keep R4 free from abuse for one out of five residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in R4 sustaining abrasions to the face and right wrist. A reasonable person would feel terrified and scared to be attacked by being punched and kicked while on the floor. Findings include: On 04/03/2024 at 12:06 PM, R4 was alert and oriented to person, place, and date. R4 had a red mark near the right eye, abrasions underneath the left eye, and a red mark to right wrist. R4 stated getting into an altercation on Monday with another resident (R5). R4 was scared because the other resident was slamming bedroom door loudly. The resident was running and cursing in the hall. R4 went to the nurses' station to ask what was going on. R4 headed back towards the bedroom. R4 stated [resident] was using [resident's] freedom of speech. I was scared with what was going on. So, I started using my freedom of speech. R4 stated the resident went into the bedroom and then all of a sudden came back out and started attacking R4 with punches.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of document the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from abuse for one of three residents reviewed (R2) for allegations of abuse. This failure resulted in R2 being sent to the emergency room and returning to facility with a 1cm laceration to the right cheek. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year-old male with a diagnosis including Schizophrenia, Psychosis, Bipolar Disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease , and Anxiety Disorder. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged from facility on 2/9/24. R2 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) is 15/15, cognitively intact. Resident is at moderate risk for abuse due to possible misinterpretations of events and the intentions of others. Denial and/or evasiveness: when discussing mental health issues, signs and symptoms of depression/mood distress, Low self-esteem, isolation and withdrawn behavior. R8 is a [AGE] year-old male with a diagnosis including schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type. R8 has a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents knew staff names and titles due to staff not wearing identification badges. This failure has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include:On 3/17/2026 at 11:03 AM, R1 stated that when he wants to make a complaint about a staff member, he is unable to identify the individual because staff do not wear identification badges. R1 stated he had spoken with the (V10) (Assistant Director of Nursing), the nurse, and the nurse on staff; however, many staff use nicknames and do not wear name badges, so he is unable to identify which staff members he reported concerns to. On 3/17/2026 at 11:22 AM, V8 (Certified Nurse Assistant-(CNA) stated I (V8) don't have an identification badge because I (V8) am a new employee. Observed V8 in the hallway on unit 2 with towels in his hand. On 3/17/2026 at 11:23 AM, V3 (Certified Nurse Assistant-(CNA) was stopped in the hallway and verified with surveyor she (V3) was not wearing her identification badge. Observed V3 in the hallway on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the residents right to be free from physical abuse for 2 of 4 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse. This resulted in R1 being grabbed by the throat by R2.Findings include:R1 is a [AGE] year old with a diagnosis including Fibromyalgia , Bipolar disorder , COPD , Alcohol Abuse , Anxiety Disorder and Borderline personality Disorder. R1 was first admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 has a BIMS ( Brief Interview Of Mental Status ) score of 15/15 indicating R1 is cognitively intact.R2 is a [AGE] year old with a diagnosis including COPD , Post Traumatic Stress Disorder , Bi Polar Disorder , Fibromyalgia and Venous Insufficiency. R2 was first admitted to facility on 4/30/25. R2 has a BIMS ( Brief Interview Of Mental Status ) score of 14/15, indicating R2 is cognitively intact. On 7/23/25 at 10:20AM R1 stated R2 grabbed my throat a couple days ago outside the room at the door during smoking time. R2 was my roommate at the time. I reported this to V4,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview , observation and document review the facility failed to ensure the facility maintains an effective pest control program on 1 of 3 resident floors.Findings include.On 7/29/25 the facility was toured and observed for evidence of rodents and insect infestation. V5, Maintenance Director was present during tour.R11s room observed with numerous mouse droppings between wall and bedside cabinet.R12s room mouse droppings observed all along top of floor heat register.R13 and R14s room mouse droppings under floor heat register.R15s room observed with mouse droppings under the floor heat register.On 7/29/25 at 1:05PM R11 stated I see mice here a lot at night.On 7/29/25 at 1:10PM R12 stated I see mice they come from under the floor heat register mostly at night.On 7/29/25 at 1:15PM R13 stated yes mice are all over on this floor. I see them at night.On 7/29/25 at 1:16PM R14 stated there are mice here in my room at night. They come from the walls.On 7/29/25 at 1:20PM R15 stated I see mice here in my room on the floor at night.Facility policy titled Integrated Pest Management…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions. These failures resulted in R3's (5/2/25) fall with sustained right hip impacted intertrochanteric fracture with varus deformity which required surgery. Findings include: R3's diagnoses include metabolic encephalopathy, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait/mobility, and fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur. R3'S (10/2/24) fall risk evaluation determined a score of 25 (high risk). R3's (5/14/25) functional assessment affirms resident is dependent on staff for chair/bed to chair transfer and walking was not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns. R3's (7/23/24) care plan states resident is at high risk for falls related to unsteady gait and incontinence. Interventions: (10/2/24) encourage appropriate use of assistive devices. (5/7/25) staff to monitor resident and assist as needed, (5/20/25) keep bed in lowest position, (5/27/25) promote placement of call light within reach, (5/27/25) bed wedges in place on side of bed for additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and obtain a treatment order, failed to monitor and document the status of a wound, and failed to develop an individualized care plan to address the wound of 1 resident (R1) out of 2 residents reviewed for wound care. Findings Include: On 5/6/25 at 10:56 AM, observed R1 in her room alert and able to verbalize needs. R1 stated when she was admitted in the facility, she had a healing surgical wound on her abdominal area. R1 stated she had a hernia repair six months ago and it takes a while for the wound to heal because she is Diabetic. R1 stated that the surgical site re-opened sometime last month, and she notified a nurse (could not remember nurse's name). R1 stated that staff are not doing anything to treat her re-opened surgical wound. On 5/6/25 at 11:15 AM, V7 (Registered Nurse) was asked to check R1's surgical site on her abdominal area with this surveyor and noted a small, opened wound measuring approximately 0.5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from resident-to-resident physical altercation. This failure affected 2 residents (R1,R2) reviewed for abuse in the total sample of 6 residents. Finding include: On 01/27/2025, at 11:43am, R2 stated we (R1 and R2) had a fight. I don't want to talk about it anymore. On 01/27/2025, at 12:21pm, R5 stated the fight happened in the 1st floor dining room. They were to each other's face, talking loudly. Then they start hitting and pushing each other, (R1) hit (R2)'s head and (R2) fell down. On 01/28/2025, at 10:44am, speaking with V11 (Housekeeping Director) and V9 (Housekeeping) stated if there are two residents arguing, the first thing I need to do is to separate them so it will not escalate to physical altercation. On 01/28/2025, at 10:51am, V9 stated I was cleaning room * or * when I heard a lot of screaming and I saw (R1) and (R2) were fighting. (R2) pushed (R1). I saw one nurse. This nurse told (R2) to go back to his room on the 2nd floor. I did not see (R2) going back to the second floor because I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Abuse final Reportable was sent to the Survey Agency within the mandated time frame. This failure affected 2 (R1 and R2) residents reviewed for timely submission of reportable in the total sample of 6 residents. Findings include. R1 and R2 (12/15/2024) initial reportable documented, in part Date/Time Reported to State: 12/15/2024 at 3:38pm. Time Stamp on the printed Confirmation 12/15/2024 3:38PM. The (printed on: 01/30/2025) Department of Public Health Incident portal documented that abuse report template was uploaded on 12/23/2024. On 01/30/2025 1:16pm, V1 (Administrator) stated the abuse coordinator is myself or the assistant administrator if I am not here. For abuse, the timeframe for reporting the initial reportable is immediately or within 2 hours. Abuse final reportable is expected to be submitted within 5 working days. This surveyor informed V1 there was an uploaded document dated 12/23/2024 and inquired if that was the final reportable for R1 and R2 abuse incident. V1 stated that is correct. This surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-23 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the cook has appropriate competencies and skills resulting in recipes during food preparation not being followed. This failure has the potential to affect all 128 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 08/21/24 at 10:30 AM, V21 (Cook) stated V21 is the cook that will be preparing the pureed foods for lunch. V21 stated there are four residents on a pureed diet and V21 follows the recipe for five serving portions. V21 said, I follow that pointing to the recipe binder which was opened to recipe for pureed pork fritter. On 08/21/24 at 10:38 AM, observed V21 review the recipe for pureed pork fritter and then grab a regular soup spoon, not a standard measuring Tablespoon. The recipe for pureed pork fritter on bun listed 1 Tablespoon of chicken base to be added for 5 servings. Observe V21 then opened a large bin container of powdered chicken base and reached in using the regular soup spoon to scoop out two heaping scoops of the chicken base. V21 placed the chicken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated with an opened and use by date, failed to discard expired food based on use by guidelines and labeled use by date. The facility also failed to sanitize cooking equipment based on manufacturers' guidelines. These failures have the potential to affect all 128 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 08/20/24 at 9:22 AM, V19 (Dietary Manager) stated all items in the refrigerators should be labeled with an open and use by date. V19 stated if the item was first delivered as a dry storage item, then there should also be a delivery date on that item in addition to the open and use by date. V19 stated items should be used within six days unless manufacturer label says otherwise. V19 stated it is everyone's responsibility to label and date items. It is important for all items to be labeled and dated to make sure the kitchen does not use expired products because this could potentially lead to food borne illness. On 8/20/24 at 9:30 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who smoke are re-evaluated on a quarterly basis for their ability to smoke safely and smoking care plan was followed. These failures affect 4 (R1, R18, R41, R62) of 7 residents reviewed for smoking in the sample of 26. Findings include: Facility provided policy titled Smoking Policy dated January 2024 which documents in part, to establish guidelines to prohibit smoking by residents and visitors in the building except in designated areas. To establish guidelines for the specific circumstances in which residents may smoke in the designated areas and when increased supervision is required. Facility provided a document titled Smokers undated. R1, R18, R41, R62 are listed on this document. 1. R41's diagnosis included but not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With (Acute) Exacerbation, Personal History Of Nicotine Dependence, Generalized Idiopathic Epilepsy And Epileptic Syndromes, Intractable, With Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: (a) properly date opened multi-dose medication solution, eye drops and inhalers; (b) properly store unopened multi-dose insulin vial and (c) properly discard expired house stock medication from 3 of 5 medication carts and 2 of 3 medication storage rooms inspected for medication storage and labeling. These failures affect 7 residents (R4, R16, R29, R34, R70, R75, R127) reviewed during medication storage observation. Findings include: On [DATE] at 10:23am Medication cart on 3rd floor inspected with V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse / LPN), stated has been working in the facility for 10 years. Observed the following inside the medication cart: 1. R16's Risperidone solution opened with no open date labelled. R16's POS (Physician Order Sheet) with order not limited to: risperidone Oral Solution 1 MG/ML (Risperidone) Give 2 ml by mouth two times a day. 2. R127's multi-dose Brimodine 0.2% solution with no open date. R127's POS showed order not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess eligibility and offer pneumococcal vaccinations, and failed to provide eligible residents and/or resident representatives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of all available pneumococcal vaccinations to 4 (R1, R11, R128, R102) out of 6 residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations in the sample of 26. Findings Include: On 8/20/24 at 10:54 AM, interviewed V14 (Infection Control Nurse) and stated that the facility sets up vaccination clinics for residents who need to receive the vaccines. V14 stated that the residents are educated about the vaccines. V14 stated that after the education is provided, consents are obtained from the resident or their representative. V14 stated that consents are uploaded right away in the resident's electronic health records (EHR) under the miscellaneous tab. V14 stated that V14 has no educational material that V14 provides to the residents about the vaccines. V14 stated V14 does it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess eligibility and offer COVID-19 vaccination for 4 residents (R11, R110, R231, R128), failed to ensure the residents medical records includes documentation if COVID-19 vaccinations were received or did not receive for 5 residents (R1, R11, R110, R231, R128), and failed to ensure the residents medical records includes documentation that education was provided to residents and/or resident representatives regarding the benefits and potential side effects of COVID-19 vaccination for 6 residents (R1, R11, R110, R231, R128, R102) out of 6 residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination in the sample of 26. Findings Include: On 8/20/24 at 10:54 AM, interviewed V14 (Infection Control Nurse) and stated that the facility sets up vaccination clinics for residents who need to receive the vaccines. V14 stated that the residents are educated about the vaccines. V14 stated that after the education is provided, consents are obtained from the resident or their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments using the CMS-specified Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process within the regulatory timeframes for one (R30) of seven residents reviewed for resident assessment in a sample of 26. Findings include: On 8/20/24, per review of R30's electronic health record (EHR) R30 was admitted to hospice on 06/26/24. Review of R30's Minimum Data Set (MDS) schedule indicates R30's last MDS assessment was completed 06/14/24 as a quarterly assessment and R30's next quarterly assessment is scheduled for 09/16/24. On 08/21/24 at 1:44 PM, V23 (MDS Coordinator) stated residents are reassessed every 90 days and/or if there is a significant change. V23 stated significant change assessments must be done if there is a change in one or two areas relate to functional ability or Activities of Daily Living, if the resident is admitted to hospice, and/or if the resident has had a fall with injuries, and/or readmitted from the hospital with a new diagnosis. V23 stated a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident receiving hospice services for end-of-life support. This failure affects one resident (R30) out of one reviewed for hospice and comprehensive care plan in a sample of 26. Findings include: R30 has a diagnosis including but not limited to Chronic Respiratory Failure, Weakness, Unsteadiness On Feet, Dysphagia Following Cerebral Infarction, Lack of Coordination, Abnormal Posture, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications, Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction, Hydronephrosis, Shortness Of Breath, Long Term (Current) Use of Insulin, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Personal History of Traumatic Brain Injury, Hypertension, Personal History of Suicidal Behavior, Anemia, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease without Esophagitis, Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia, Hyperlipidemia, Bipolar Disorder, Current Episode Mixed, Severe, with Psychotic Features, Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies and procedures to appropriately store oxygen tubing when not in use for 1 (R70) resident in a sample of 26. Findings Include: R70's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R70 is cognitively intact. R70's Physician Order Sheet (POS) shows active order as of 8/20/24, Oxygen at 2Liters per nasal cannula continuous every shift related to acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. On 08/20/24 at 11:14 AM, surveyor with V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) observed R70's oxygen nasal cannula tubing on the floor when not in use. V10 picked R70's oxygen nasal cannula tubing from the floor and placed the nasal cannula tubing on the oxygen tank. On 08/20/24 at 11:20 AM, surveyor and V8 (Registered Nurse/RN)) both entered R70's room. Surveyor asked V8 where should R70's oxygen nasal cannula tubing be stored when not in use? V8 stated R70's oxygen tubing should have been stored inside a plastic bag when not in use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for 2 (R27, R103) of 11 residents in the sample reviewed for medication administration. There were 31 opportunities and 4 errors resulting to 12.9% medication error rate. Findings include: R27's face sheet documented admission date on 8/25/2021 with diagnoses not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Personal history of covid-19, Schizoaffective disorder, Bipolar disorder, Major depressive disorder, Anxiety disorder, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, Fibromyalgia. R103's face sheet documented admission date on 4/12/2023 with diagnoses not limited to Schizophrenia, Major depressive disorder. On 8/20/24 at 9:33AM Medication administration observation conducted with V6 (Registered Nurse / RN), checked R27's BP (blood pressure) =125/78 and PR (Pulse Rate) =101/min. V6 prepared and administered the following medications to R27: Saccharomyces Boulardi Probiotic 1 capsule, Omeprazole (Anti-reflux) 20mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility [A] failed to ensure housekeeping services were provided to maintain a clean and sanitary environment related to offensive odors, unclean floors, and bathrooms [B] failed to ensure the facility's furniture, equipment, plumbing, and over bed light fixtures were functioning properly for 8 [R1, R2, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10] out of 10 residents in the sample reviewed for a homelike environment. Findings include: R2's clinical record indicates in part; R2 was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnosis of acute bronchospasm, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, auditory hallucinations, anxiety disorder, essential (primary) hypertension, and bipolar disorder. R2's Minimum Data set, Brief Interview dated 5/10/24, scored [02], indicates R2 is moderately impaired. During the facility tour dates of 7/9/24 thru 7/12/24, surveyor noted foul odors, missing drawers on R2, R5, R7, R8 bedside dressers, and noted one of the elevators was out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete records of a resident's (R1) personal funds and provide R1's financial records quarterly and upon request for one out of four residents reviewed for trust fund. Findings include: R1's 4/16/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment documents in part that R1 is cognitively intact with no signs and symptoms of delirium. R1's 6/20/2024 Behavioral Health Progress Note documents in part that R1 is alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. On 7/09/2024 at 11:53 AM, R1 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. R1 answered questions appropriately. R1 stated receiving a $10,000 check from V33's (R1's family member) estate at the beginning of the year. V34 (former Business Office Manager) went to R1's room and instructed R1 to sign the back of the check and hand it over to the facility. R1 requested multiple updates regarding the money but was told it was 'in process' due to the facility switching ownership. R1 started asking for billing statements in May. That's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve a grievance and keep a resident updated on the progress of the investigation for one (R1) out of three residents who had spoken to staff regarding their concerns. Findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis not limited to Paraplegia, Low Back Pain, Psychosis, Bipolar Disorder and Anemia. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 15 indicating intact cognitive response. Document titled Concern/Compliment Form date received: 05/09/24 document in part: Name of person voicing concern/compliment: R1. Concern/compliment reported to V4 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director): R1 had a check for $10,000 that was deposited at the end of February. R1 takes out money from her trust fund each week. The $10,000 was not reflecting in account. R1 was upset because it is her money. Documentation of Facility Follow-up: Date assigned: 05/09/24, Expected date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record view the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of a resident funds by failing to submit a report within the required time frame to the Illinois State agency for one (R1) of one resident reviewed for the abuse. Findings Include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis not limited to Paraplegia, Low Back Pain, Psychosis, Bipolar Disorder and Anemia. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 15 indicating intact cognitive response. Document titled Concern/Compliment Form date received: 05/09/24 document in part: Name of person voicing concern/compliment: R1. Concern/compliment reported to V4 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services Director): R1 had a check for $10,000 that was deposited at the end of February. R1 takes out money from her trust fund each week. The $10,000 was not reflecting in account. R1 was upset because it is her money. Documentation of Facility Follow-up: Date assigned: 05/09/24, Expected date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespreadTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a serious fire incident that had the potential of causing serious bodily injury within 24 hours for 2 (R3, R4) of 4 residents sampled. This failure has the potential to affect all 123 residents residing in the facility at time of incident. Findings include: Review of resident progress notes and interview of V1 (Administrator) it was substantiated that on 1/21/24 at 11:30PM, R3 set R4's mattress on fire following an argument between both residents. Facility reportable incident logs were reviewed on 2/20/24. No incidents related to the 1/21/24 facility mattress fire was reported to the State Survey Agency. On 2/20/24 at 10:39 AM V1 (Administrator) stated we were considering discharge of R3 after the fire but after speaking with the guardian we did not. I did not file an incident with the mattress fire because nobody was hurt and no one was touched. R3 started the fire with a lighter. R3 stated he brought the lighter in from the community. He has behaviors when we restrict him from going into the community. We let him…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents right to be free of abuse for two (R1, R3) of four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of eight residents. Findings include: 1. R1 is a [AGE] year old female resident with a diagnosis including Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder and Post - Traumatic Disorder. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12/15. R1 Abuse/Neglect Screening Risk is 3 (Moderate). R2 is a [AGE] year old male resident with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Schizophrenia and Bi Polar Disorder. R2 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) is 11/15. R2 Social Service Abuse/Neglect Screening scored 3 Moderate Risk. Facility incident report dated 8/29/23 states that on 8/29/23 at 10AM, R1 alleged that R2 touched her inappropriately. Investigation was initiated, Residents separated, Police contacted, Family contacted and R2 was immediately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to a.) properly clean and sanitize tableware and cooking equipment, b.) ensure food items were properly label and dated, c.) properly store raw animal food separately from ready to eat foods, d.) follow hand washing and glove usage procedure. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all 126 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 07/09/23 at 9:14 AM, during initial kitchen tour with V4 (Dietary Manager) observed V5 (Dietary Aide) working in the dish room area alone in front of the dish machine rinsing off dirty plate ware (plastic bowls, plates, metal plate covers) and plastic meal trays. V5 placed them into the dishwasher racks. V5 was feeding the dirty items in the dishwater racks into the dishwasher, and then reaching around to the clean side of the dish machine to pull them out of the dishwasher without performing hand hygiene in between the two tasks. V5 did not perform any hand hygiene in between handling the dirty and clean items. On 07/09/23 at 9:16 AM, observed V5 still…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for four residents (R12, R21, R51, R56) and staff failed to respond in a timely manner to the call light for one resident (R51) of 7 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs in a total sample of 25. Findings include: 1) On 07/09/23 at 12:10 PM, observed R51 lying in bed with the call light cord wrapped tightly in a circle against the wall hanging from the call light box with the call light button dangling toward the floor out of R51's reach. R51 stated, there isn't a call light in here, I wish there was and I don't have a call light. R51 stated R51 tells R51's roommate when R51 needs help, and the roommate goes and gets a staff member. R51 stated if the roommate was not in the room when R51 needed help, I'd be in big trouble, and R51 would have to wait until the roommate returns. R51's roommate confirms R51 tells the roommate when R51 needs help. R51's roommate stated, I am not here all the time. I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow smoking safety policy by not completing smoking safety assessment upon admission for one resident (R177) and on a quarterly basis for four residents (R20, R27, R47, R77) to determine the level of assistance and supervision needed during smoking, the ability to carry and store smoking materials, and if a smoking apron is indicated. The facility also failed to ensure that smoking care plan is initiated/ developed upon admission for one resident (R177). These failures can potentially affect five (R20, R27 R47, R77 and R177) of eight residents reviewed for smoking in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1) On 7/9/23 at 11:14 am R20 was ambulating with steady gait, alert and verbally responsive. R20 stated he is a smoker and smoking in designated area in the back patio. R20 stated that facility staff is keeping smoking materials. R20's health record documented admission date of 9/24/19 with diagnoses not limited to Chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy for psychotropic medication by failing to obtain or provide consent of psychotropic medication use for two (R20 and R53) residents, failed to monitor residents on antipsychotic drug therapy by not completing Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment timely for four (R20, R2, R35 and R53) residents, and failed to review drug regimen irregularities / recommendations for one (R53) five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 25. Findings include: 1) On 7/9/23 at 11:01 am R2 was alert and verbally responsive, up and about, ambulatory with steady gait. R2's health record documented admission date of 2/7/2019 with diagnoses not limited to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Schizoaffective disorder, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Essential hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Major depressive disorder, Generalized anxiety disorder, Insomnia, Chronic pain, Gastro-esophageal reflux, Osteoarthritis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy and procedures for medication storage and labeling by failing to discard expired house-stock medications, failing to ensure personal items and floor cleaner chemicals were stored separately. The facility also failed to ensure that medications are labeled with open date for four (R24, R39, R41, R50) residents and failed to ensure that medication is stored in the container in which they were originally received for one resident (R78). These failures affect five residents (R24, R39, R41, R50, R78) in the sample of 25 residents. Findings include: On 7/10/23 at 9:18 AM 3rd floor medication room was inspected with V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN). This medication room had two white refrigerators. There was dust, paper and plastic in between the two refrigerators. The storage cabinet was unorganized with dust all over and house stock medications being stored with personal items including an umbrella, shoes, transparent plastic ware and a water bottle. There was a bottle of hard surface floor cleaner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment using the CMS-specified Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process within the regulatory timeframe for one (R33) of four residents reviewed for quarterly resident assessment on the total sample list of 25. Findings Include: On 7/11/23 at 11:06 M, R33's electronic health record (EHR) reviewed. R33 was admitted on [DATE]. R33's Quarterly MDS assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/18/23 was completed on 2/6/23 past the 14 days regulatory timeframe. At 1:10 PM, interviewed V23 (MDS Coordinator/Care Plan Coordinator) and stated that Quarterly MDS assessments are signed and completed the day after the ARD. V23 stated that the facility follows the (Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual to complete the MDS assessments. The facility's RAI Version 3.0 Manual dated October 2018 page 2-17 titled RAI OBRA-required Assessment Summary indicates that Quarterly (Non-Comprehensive) MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan with goals and interventions for two residents (R24, R56) reviewed for care plans on the total sample list of 25. Findings include: R24 diagnoses include but are not limited to Chronic Kidney Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Atopic Dermatitis, Chronic Viral Hepatitis. R24 Braden Observation, dated 5/27/23, indicates R24 has moderate risk in developing pressure ulcers. R24's MDS (minimum data set) assessment, dated 6/1/23, documents, section M, (R24) is at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. R24's comprehensive care plan does not address R24 is at risk for pressure ulcers/injury. R56 diagnoses include but are not limited to Schizophreniform, major Depressive Disorder, Mood Disorder due to known physiological condition, Psychotic Disorder. R56 has orders for the following psychotropic medications: Haloperidol tablet 2 milligrams, Mirtazapine tablet 15mg, Quetiapine Fumarate tablet 50mg. R56's comprehensive care plan does not address R56's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a current code status for one (R7) of one residents is correctly addressed in the comprehensive care plan in a sample of 25 reviewed for advance directives. Findings Include: On [DATE] at 11:24 AM, R7's face sheet and physician order sheet (POS) shows R7 is a Full Code. R7's Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form shows R7 chose Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) should be attempted in the event R7 is found with no pulse and is not breathing. R7's comprehensive care plan shows R7 selected Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) should R7 stops breathing and displays no pulse. At 12:34 PM, V18 (Social Service Director) stated that a resident's code status should be ordered in the POS and addressed in the care plan. V18 stated that care plan is updated right away when the code status is changed. V18 stated that DNR means if the heart stops, they don't perform CPR and Full code means if the heart stops staff has to perform CPR to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow routine catheter and infusion site care policy by not changing a midline dressing weekly for one (R5) of one residents reviewed for intravenous therapy in the sample of 25. The findings include: On 7/9/23 at 1:28 pm during Medication administration observation conducted with V10 (Registered Nurse / RN) R5 was lying in bed, alert and verbally responsive. V10 administered Zosyn 3.375 grams IV (Intravenous). R5 had a single lumen midline on right upper arm, R5's dressing was dated 6/30/23 and was peeling from R5 skin. V10 stated that IV antibiotic is for sacral wound infection. V10 stated that midline dressing should be changed weekly and as needed. V10 confirmed that midline dressing was dated 6/30/23 and should have been changed on 7/7/23. R5's health record documented admission date of 6/22/23 with diagnoses not limited to Infection of intervertebral disc, sacral and sacrococcygeal region; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Major depressive disorder; Chronic pain; Ileostomy status; Neuromuscular dysfunction of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy for oxygen therapy for one (R53) of one residents reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 25. Findings include: On 7/9/23 10:09 am R53 was up and about, ambulatory with steady gait, alert and verbally responsive. R53's oxygen tubing in R53's bed, oxygen machine/concentrator was off. R53 turned on oxygen machine / at 2Liter/minute 2L/min) and put on oxygen tubing via nasal cannula. R53's oxygen cannula was not dated. R53 had no door sign for oxygen in use. R53 had no bag to place oxygen tubing / cannula when not in use. Requested V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse / LPN) to R53's room, V11 confirmed that R53's oxygen is at 2L/min. V11 confirmed that there is no date on oxygen tubing. V11 stated R53 is removing oxygen tubing when R53 goes to smoke. R53's health record documented admission date of 2/14/19 with diagnoses not limited to Pneumonia, Asthma, Schizoaffective disorder, Restlessness and agitation, Major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the meal ticket menu for 1 (R7) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition in a total sample of 25 residents. Findings Include: On 07/09/23 at 12:30 PM, R7 was eating lunch in her room with V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse) supervising R7. R7's lunch tray consisted of pureed pork, pureed potatoes, pureed spinach, and a beverage. R7's meal ticket shows R7 was supposed to also receive pureed buttered dinner roll and pureed cinnamon diced pears, but these items were not on R7's lunch tray. At 12:45 PM, R7 ate 100% of R7's lunch and still did not receive the pureed cinnamon diced pears and pureed buttered dinner roll. On 7/11/23 at 11:29 AM, a phone interview conducted with V26 (Registered Dietitian). V26 stated that residents on mechanically altered diets can be at nutritional risks. V26 stated that these residents should be receiving the same food as regular diets on a mechanically altered textures. V26 stated that it is important to ensure the residents are getting correct nutrition and it's V26's expectation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to a.) monitor the temperature of a resident's personal refrigerator, b.) label and date food items in a resident's personal refrigerator for 1 resident (R78) reviewed on the sample of 25 for safe personal food storage. Findings include: On 07/09/23 at 11:10 AM, observed inside R78's personal refrigerator 2% milk carton with use by date 06/26/23, a plastic bag containing American cheese wrapped in foil with no date on it and an open container of creamed cheese with no date on it. R78 did not know exactly how long those items had been in the refrigerator, estimating two-three weeks. There was no thermometer in R78's refrigerator. R78 stated that staff does not check R78's refrigerator. On 07/11/23 at 8:51 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated I thought we did away with the resident refrigerators and didn't realize they were not being monitored. V1 stated that now that it's been brought to my (V1) attention, I (V1) am addressing it. V1 stated V1 ordered thermometers yesterday for each resident's refrigerator and log sheets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to discard food items stored in the refrigerator on time, failed to label food, failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves appropriately, and failed to follow proper food storage practices to prevent food borne illnesses. These failures have the potential to affect all 107 residents residing in the facility who are getting nutrition orally. Findings include: The (06/06/2022) facility census was 108. The (undated) List of residents on NPO (Nothing Per Orem) documented that there was 1 resident on NPO. On 06/06/2022 at 9:54am, inside the reach in cooler, there was a container of apple sauce with open date 5/28/22 and an open container of prune juice with open date 5/16/2022. V6 (Dietary Manager) stated that the apple sauce should be discarded yesterday and the prune juice should be discarded on 5/23/2022. On 06/06/2022 at 9:55am, surveyor inquired about the importance of discarding food accordingly. V6 stated, Resident may get sick eating it. On 6/06/2022 at 10:17am, there was a container of ground beef in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster is fully closed at all times and failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure that the facility is free of insects. These failures have the potential to affect all 108 residents in the facility. Findings included: On 06/06/2022 at 11:18am, the lid of the outside dumpster was missing a piece. On 06/06/2022 at 11:19am, surveyor inquired about the dumpster lid. V8 (Housekeeping Director) stated, It is broken. We need to replace it. On 06/06/2022 at 11:20am, surveyor inquired about the importance of making sure the dumpster was fully closed. V8 stated, The dumpster needs to be closed at all times so the insects, rats and the squirrel will not be able to get inside the dumpster. On 06/08/2022 at 9:30am, in the skills training room, there was a black dead roach, approximately an inch long, on the mantle underneath the television. V8 was notified of this observation. V8 put a glove on and grabbed the dead insect with the gloved hand and proceeded to throw the insect into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to enter a code status order in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the physician orders which affected two residents (R28 and R73); failed to ensure that a current and properly completed copy of the resident's IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) Uniform Practitioner Order Form for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) was in the electronic medical record which affected three residents (R14, R36 and R95); and failed to ensure the care plan matched the current code status order for one resident (R14) in the sample of 51 residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: On [DATE] at 1:32 PM, during record review, R36's POLST form was noted to be scanned into the EMR (Electronic Medical Record), but no box was checked on the form indicating either full code or DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) status. On [DATE] at 1:40 PM, during record review, R95's POLST form scanned into the EMR also had no box checked indicating the code status. This finding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide functional lights, and a clean wall and window. These failures affected 5 residents (R25, R26, R27, R43, R79) reviewed for safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in the sample of 51 residents. Findings include: On 06/06/22 at 11:22 AM, during initial tour the following observations were made: R26's light behind the head of bed cover was missing, lightbulb tube was exposed, and light did not work. R26 stated that at night she does not want to turn on overhead light to prevent bothering her roommate. R26 stated that she (R26) uses light at night to read. R26 stated that she (R26) told staff about this problem. On 06/06/22 at 11:35 AM, observed a black substance located on the wall in R27's room under the window and observed paint bubbling and peeling on the inside window ledge. On 06/06/22 at 2:48 PM, surveyor and V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) viewed R27's wall under the window. V10 stated there was a black substance coming from the window and that the window ledge had paint bubbling.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide and maintain a temperature log for the refrigerator that stores the resident's insulin on the second floor. This failure has the potential to affect all residents that reside on the 2nd floor. Findings: On 6/08/2022 at 12:49pm, surveyor did not see the temperature log for the small refrigerator in the medication room on the second floor. On 6/08/2022 at 12:49pm V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) said, I don't know who took it down and the purpose of the temperature log is to make sure insulins are being stored at the correct temperature so that it doesn't freeze. On 6/08/2022 at 12:51pm, surveyor inquired about the temperature log for the small refrigerator that stores insulin and V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) said, It is not here on the refrigerator; sorry, I will fix it right now. Policy titled Medication Storage with a revised date of 1/05/2022 states, in part, to ensure proper storage and facility should ensure that medications and biologicals are stored at their appropriate temperatures according to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a smoking care plan for 1 (R68) resident reviewed for comprehensive care plan in the sample of 51 residents. Findings include: On 06/06/2022 at 11:11am, R68 stated, I smoke cigarette. R68's (Target Date: 04/19/2022) Care Plan was reviewed; no smoking care plan noted. On 06/08/2022 at 3:15pm, surveyor inquired about PRSC (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Service Coordinator) job description. V21 (Psychiatric Rehabilitation Service Coordinator/PSRC) stated, I (V21) complete community, aggression, smoking, and abuse assessments. I also do care plan for admission, insert advance directive, trauma history, communication issue, behavior. I also care plan if the resident smokes or not compliant with smoking policy. On 06/08/2022 at 3:19pm, surveyor inquired if R68 smokes, V21 stated, R68 smokes on and off. He should be care planned for smoking. On 06/08/2022 at 3:22pm, surveyor opened R68's electronic record on the surveyor's tablet and clicked the tab 'Care Plan' start date 4/15/2022, showed it to V21 and requested V21 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care related to nail care for one dependent resident (R42) in the sample of 51 residents when reviewed for ADL care. Findings include: On 06/06/22 at 11:52 AM, R42 was observed sitting in the dining area in a wheelchair. R42 was noted to have long fingernails about 1/2 inch beyond the tip of the finger. R42 stated that R42 would like to have R42's fingernails cut. This observation was brought to the attention of V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) who stated, I know they are (fingernails) long and they need to be cut, but I have to ask the nurse. On 06/08/22 at 1:49 PM, during interview with V2 (Director of Nursing/DON), the surveyor asked who is responsible for providing nail care. V2 stated that the CNAs are supposed to trim resident's nails. The importance of nail care per V2 is that It's part of infection control because you don't want them to transfer bacteria that can be under the nails. R42's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/5/22 documents, in part, that R42…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to be free of medication error rate of 5% or more. There were a total of 8 medication errors out of 25 opportunities. The medication error rate was 32% that affected R42 and R44. Findings include: On 06/07/2021 at 9:27am, surveyor reviewed R42's EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) screen that was pink for R42's scheduled 8:00am medications. V9 (License Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that pink means the meds are late and meds are supposed to be given between 8:00am and 9:00am. On 6/07/2022 at 9:37am, surveyor observed V9 give R42's 8:00am dose of Insulin Determir Solution 100 unit/ml. On 6/07/2022 at 9:49am, surveyor observed V9 give R42 her 8:00am meds. On 6/07/2022 at 9:49am, surveyor observed V9 give R42's Keppra 100mg/ml, Haloperidol 5mg, Bethanachol Chloride and Tamulosin HCL 0.4mg. On 06/07/2022 at 8:59am, surveyor observed V9 give R44's Oyster Shell Calcium and at 9:00 and give Ibuprofen for leg pain with a pain level of 8. V9 did not give R44 the 8:00am dose of Cholecalciferol Capsule 1000…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-07-12 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to display the [NAME] Class Members retaliation hotline number. This failure has the potential to affect all 45 [NAME] members. Findings Include: On 7/09/23 at approximately 12:52 PM, during the survey team's initial observations, there were no [NAME] Class Members Retaliation hotline numbers posted on the first, second, and third floors where the residents reside. At 1:00 PM V18 (Social Service Director) stated that the facility has [NAME] members and that the [NAME] Hotline signage should be on each floor in the hallways visible to the residents.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$301,750 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $17,108 — penalty dated 2024-07-12
- $91,403 — penalty dated 2024-03-07
- $193,239 — penalty dated 2023-09-03
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-05 for 1 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- ALIYA FIVE HOLDINGS LLC — investment firm · 99.99% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALIYA FIVE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/01/2024 |
| ALIYA GB MEMBER A LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| ALIYA OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| HAVEN CAPITAL LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| ERLICH, MOSHE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| REIFER, JORDAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| OPTIMUMBANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| WEST RIDGE PROPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| WEINFELD, EFRIAM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| SHAH, BHARAT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145832. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.