Smith Village
2320 West 113th Place, Chicago, IL 60643 · Non profit - Other · 78 certified beds · (773) 474-7300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jan 2026
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (23) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,350 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-16)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.9% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.9% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 9.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.2% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 30.3% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.4% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.3% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.5% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.7% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.4% | 63.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.8% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.4% | 13.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.18 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.35 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
67.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 318 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 135 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 67.6%CMS range 62.2–73.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.0%CMS range 6.4–11.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 4.7–9.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 65.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.48 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.19 to 0.94 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
23 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-05-16 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate discharge for one resident reviewed for discharge practices by discharging the resident despite abnormal laboratory results indicative of dehydration. This deficient practice affected one (R1) of two residents reviewed for discharge. As a result, R1 was readmitted to the hospital within 48 hours of discharge with diagnoses of acute metabolic encephalopathy, likely secondary to a combination of dementia, dehydration, and urinary tract infection (UTI).Failure to ensure the resident was medically stable prior to discharge had the potential to result in worsening dehydration, delayed medical treatment, increased risk for hospitalization, and adverse health outcomes related to unresolved clinical conditions.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on 2/18/2026. Her medical history includes fracture of left pubis, acute kidney failure, muscle wasting and atrophy, ataxic gait, type 2 diabetes mellitus, elevated white…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-01-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse protocol for one resident (R1) out of four residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in an employee cashing several of R1's personal checks without his knowledge/permission. Findings Include:R1's 7/26/2025, 19:12 admission Details reads: Arrived by other. admission mode: wheelchair. Living situation prior to admission: Other residential facility / assisted living / group home. Mental Status: Alert & Oriented x3, communicated verbally, speech is clear, is able to understand and be understood when speaking.R1's 9/4/2025 18:26 Health Status Note Text reads: Resident actively transitioning. Family visiting through shift. Hospice RN made aware and was coming to facility. Resident resting in bed. Oncoming shift aware to monitor.R1's 9/4/2025 19:20 Health Status Note Text reads: Resident being unresponsive and pulseless. Daughter /POA present. Dr. made aware.During interview on 1/15/26 at 5:00pm V5 (Assistant Executive Director) stated she received a message on her voicemail from the daughter of R1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that proper number of staff were used in transferring one of four residents (R1) to prevent accidental hazard in the sample who requires two persons assist in transfers from chair to bed or bed to chair. This failure affected R1 who was transferred from chair to bed by one staff instead of two. As a result, R1 sustained laceration of left lower leg, was sent to the hospital and the laceration required eighteen (18) sutures to be repaired. This has a potential to affect all 70-residents residing at the facility. Findings include: R1's medical record admission Record showed that R1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the latest admission date was 08/26/24 with a diagnosis list that includes but not limited to Unspecified intracapsular fracture of the left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, aftercare following joint replacement surgery, syncope and collapse, unspecified atrial fibrillation, mixed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-02-13 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the bed frame is locked to the size of the mattress for the safety of one resident (R1) reviewed for injury. As a result, R1's left lower leg made contact with the loose bed frame during transfer into bed causing a laceration. R1 was sent to the hospital and the laceration was repaired with 18 sutures. This has the potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: R1's medical record admission Record showed that R1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and latest admission date was 08/26/24 with diagnosis list that includes but not limited to Unspecified intracapsular fracture of the left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, aftercare following joint replacement surgery, syncope and collapse, unspecified atrial fibrillation, mixed hyperlipidemia, ataxic gait, muscle weakness(generalized), muscle wasting and atrophy, major depressive disorder, single…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 confused resident [R1] who is a high fall risk out of 3 [R1, R2, R3] residents reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in R1 being found on the bathroom floor bleeding to the back of the head. R1 was transferred to the hospital and R1 received laceration repair with staples. Findings Include: R1's clinical record indicates in part the following: R1 is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting medical diagnosis include but not limited to- right closed femur fracture, abnormal gait and mobility, weakness, cerebral infarction, aphasia following cerebral infarction, traumatic hemorrhage cerebral without the loss of consciousness, muscle wasting and atrophy, dementia with mood disturbance, mood affective disorder, fall on/from stairs, essential hypertension, and osteo-arthritis. R1's Minimum Data Set Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] score [04] indicates R1 is severely cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and residents' representatives when new treatments were initiated and failed to notify the physician of abnormal laboratory results for three (R1, R2 and R3) of three residents reviewed for notification of changes. This deficient practice had the potential to delay medical evaluation and treatment, limit resident and representative participation in care planning and informed decision-making, and place residents at risk for worsening conditions, avoidable hospitalization, and adverse health outcomes. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on 2/18/2026. Her medical history includes fracture of left pubis, acute kidney failure, muscle wasting and atrophy, ataxic gait, type 2 diabetes mellitus, elevated white blood cell count, dementia, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, hyperlipidemia and essential (Primary) hypertension. R1's Physician Order Sheet documents an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two licensed personnel conducted a physical inventory of controlled substances at each change of shift. This failure has the potential to affect 7 residents prescribed controlled substances on the 3J medication cart and 5 residents prescribed controlled substances on the 2J medication cart.Findings include: On 09/30/2025 at 8:41AM accompanied by V14(LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) reviewed the second-floor [NAME] medication cart's Controlled Substance Shift to Shift Count form for September 2025, this form is used by the facility for shift change accountability for controlled substances. The Nurse Off initial box was left blank for: September 17, 2025, 6:30am, - Nurse Off On 09/30/2025 at 9:36AM accompanied by V15(LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) reviewed the third-floor medication cart's Controlled Substance Shift to Shift Count form for September 2025, this form is used by the facility for shift change accountability for controlled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that kitchen staff perform proper hand hygiene; failed to label and date dry storage food and left-over prepared foods; and failed to discard foods past their discard date. These failures have the potential to affect 60 residents consuming oral diets from the facility kitchen.Findings include:On 9/29/2025 at 9:39 AM, this surveyor initiated the kitchen tour with V3 (Dietary Director). On 9/29/2025 at 9:45 AM, this surveyor viewed the dry storage room with shelving units containing stored food items in packages, containers and boxes. Orange colored labels with a date are noted attached to most dry food items. V3 stated that the orange sticker is the date of the delivery date of the food item, and V3 shows this surveyor the label machine hanging in the dry storage room with the orange stickers. On 9/29/2025 at 9:47 AM, on the shelving unit in the dry storage room, this surveyor observed 2 boxes of bananas. This surveyor is wearing surgical face mask and can smell the ripe bananas. When asked when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene before and after performing direct care to residents; failed to perform hand hygiene during dining; and failed to conduct proper respiratory etiquette during dining while feeding a resident. These failures affected three residents (R1, R5, and R27) in a total sample size of 36, and has the potential to affect all 23 residents that reside on the 3rd floor.Findings include: On 09/29/25 at 11:34am V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) performed care (repositioning and fixing under pad) to R1 without performing hand hygiene or donning gloves. V7 then removed soiled napkin from R1's bed and exited the R1's room. V7 observed entering R5's room and placing soiled napkin from R1's room on R5's dresser. V7 observed donning gloves without performing hand hygiene and assisting R5 to the restroom. V7 then observed removing gloves, picking up soiled napkin and walking to dining area. V7 observed placing soiled napkin in a basket then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled, dated and maintained to prevent the spread of foodborne illness to all residents receiving oral nutrition. This failure has the potential to affect all residents. Findings include: On 9/15/2024 at 9:54am surveyor observed a 1.5 lb. container of uncovered beef patties (sliders) out of its original packaging and a roll of pepperoni wrapped in plastic with no received date or discard date. There was a bag of tilapia fish, not individually wrapped but open to air in its original container with no discard date. On 9/15/2024 at 9:57am V4 (Dietary Manager) stated no, they (beef patties-sliders) should not be in the freezer uncovered and all food items should be covered and have a received and discard date because you will not know when to discard the items. On 9/15/2024 at 10:02am surveyor observed two 5-gallon tubs of chocolate and pecan ice cream with the top not secured on the tubs in the dairy freezer. On 9/16/2024 at 10:17am surveyor observed (2) 1.5-gallon containers of Bread Battered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the garbage dumpster lids were closed. This failure has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 9/16/2024 at 10:11am surveyor observed a blue garbage dumpster with both lids open. Surveyor observed V4 (Dining Service Manager) close both lids on the blue garbage dumpster. On 9/16/2024 at 10:11am V4 (Dining Service Manager) stated, no, the lids should not be open, but the CNAs use the dumpsters too. On 9/18/2024 at 12:30pm V8 (Environment Service Director) stated that the dumpster lids should be closed on the dumpsters. Policy titled Disposal of Garbage and Refuse with an implemented date of 2/10/2023, documents, in part, Garbage and refuse containers shall be covered when not in use and 7. Containers and dumpsters shall be kept covered when not being loaded. Undated job description titled EVS Director documents, in part, Plans, organizes and directs all functions of Environmental Services to provide for a safe, clean, functional and comfortable environment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility staff failed to complete the controlled substance shift to shift count form which is utilized to complete a shift-to-shift count for controlled substances. This failure has the potential to affect all 27 residents on the second floor and all 16 residents on the first floor. Findings include: On 09/17/2024 at 10:00AM with V13(RN/Registered Nurse) reviewed the second-floor medication cart's Controlled Substance Shift to Shift Count form for September 2024, this form is used by the facility for shift change accountability for controlled substances. The Nurse On and/or Nurse Off initial boxes were left blank for: September 08, 2024, PM Shift, - Nurse Off September 09, 2024, AM Shift-Nurse On September 11, 2024, PM Shift-Nurse Off On 09/17/2024 at 10:15AM with V14(RN/Registered Nurse) reviewed the first-floor medication cart's Controlled Substance Shift to Shift Count form for September 2024, this form is used by the facility for shift change accountability for controlled substances. The Nurse Off initial box was left blank…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident (R21) with a chronic wound was placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This failure has the potential to affect all 27 residents on the second floor. Findings include: On 09/16/24 at 9:50 am, V1 (Administrator) presented a facility census of 27 residents on the second floor. R21's face sheet shows that R21's has diagnosis which include but not limited to unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin and other symptoms and signs involving the musculoskeletal system. R21's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 06/24/24 shows that R21 has a BIMS score of 6 which indicates that R21 has some cognitive impairments. On 09/17/24 at 9:52 am, Surveyor observed R21 in bed resting with no EBP sign or Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) bin inside or near R21's room. On 09/17/24 at 9:54 am, V9 (Registered Nurse, RN, Wound Care Nurse) and V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA) were observed performing high-contact resident care activities (wound care to R21's left ischium stage 4 pressure ulcer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's (R11) urinary catheter drainage bag was covered with a privacy cover. This failure affected one resident (R11) in a sample of 44 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: On 09/17/2024 at 08:49am while in the hallway upon entry into R11's room, a urinary catheter drainage bag was observed hanging off the right-side lower bed frame of R11's bed. R11 was observed lying in the bed. R11's urinary catheter drainage bag contained yellow urine and was not covered with a privacy bag. R11's bed is the only bed in the room and the uncovered urinary catheter drainage bag was visible to others walking past R11's room door when the door was open. On 09/17/2024 at 8:53am this observation was brought to the attention of V12(LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse). V12 stated the urinary catheter drainage bag should be covered with a privacy bag. On 09/17/2024 at 8:54am observed V12(LPN) placing R11's urinary catheter drainage bag into a blue privacy bag. On 09/18/2024 at 11:10am V2(DON/Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow a resident's diet order for fluid restriction. This failure affected one resident (R37) out of 44 residents in the sample. Findings include: R37's face sheet shows that R37's has diagnosis which include but not limited to acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic kidney disease and organ limited amyloidosis. R37's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 08/19/24 shows that R37 has a BIMS score of 10 which indicates that R37 has some cognitive impairments. On 09/16/24 at 12:30 pm, R37's was observed in the second-floor dining room during the lunch meal. Surveyor observed R37 drink a 7.5 oz (ounce) can of ginger ale soda and then a 6.0 oz cup of water. Surveyor observed R37's diet card orders next to R37's lunch meal with the following dietary order documented in part: Diet Order: Regular texture no added salt, fluids thin. Notes Fluid restriction: provide the following only: 6 oz (ounces) water, coffee, juice, or soda- one of these options only . Alerts: 1500 mL (milliliter)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 8 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain temperature logs and provide thermometers for resident's personal refrigerators for two residents R1 and R29 to ensure the safety of the residents. This failure has the potential to affect all three residents (R1, R14 and R29) with personal refrigerators. Findings include: On 9/16/2024 at 10:50am surveyor observed R1's refrigerator with no log or thermometer. On 9/18/2024 at 10:37pm surveyors observed R1's refrigerator with no log or thermometer. On 9/18/2024 at 10:38am V20 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated that the kitchen staff is responsible for labeling and checking the food in resident's personal refrigerators every day. On 9/18/2024 at 9:18am V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that the family is responsible for cleaning, unthawing and discarding food from the resident's personal refrigerator. Policy titled Use and Storage of Food Brought in by Family or Visitors with a revised date of 3/26/2023 documents, in part, It is the right of the residents of this facility to have food brought in by family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise and prevent a demented and confused resident from eloping from the facility. This failure affects one of three residents (R1) reviewed for supervision in a total sample of three residents. Findings include: R1 is an [AGE] year-old female. R1's diagnoses are but not limited to muscle wasting with breakdown, abnormalities with walking and mobility, major depressive disorder, anxiety, high cholesterol, dementia, restlessness, agitation, and arthritis. R1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) dated 09/27/2023, notes R1 is alert. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 09/27/2023, notes R1 requires supervision with walking. R1's care plan notes R1 is alert with confusion and episodic anxiousness, and poor safety awareness noted daily. R1 is moderately impaired with her cognition and may benefit from cueing, redirection, and reassurance from staff. R1 does have some physical and verbal aggression. On 11/17/2023, R1 displayed wandering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled, dated, and stored; failed to ensure raw food and cooked/ready to eat foods stored properly on the same storage rack using top-to-bottom system per facility policy; and failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene in between handling dirty plate ware and clean plate ware. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 70 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 10/17/23 at 09:22 AM, V8 (Director of Dining Services) stated all food items stored in the refrigerator are labeled with an open/prepared date and a use by date. V8 stated the kitchen uses an orange sticker to label items which has the following information on it to be filled out: product name, today's date (prepared date), good thru date and staff initials. V8 stated the use by date lets staff know when the product needs to be used by and/or discarded. On 10/17/23 at 09:32 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dumpsters were covered to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests, insects, and rodents. This deficient sanitation practice has the potential to affect all 70 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: On 10/17/23 at 10:16 AM, surveyor traveled outside facility to view dumpster area with V9 (Executive Chef). Observed both lids to dumpster wide open and garbage loose inside the dumpster. Also, observed smashed Brussel Sprouts, multiple plastic gloves, milk cartons and other garbage debris on the ground all around the dumpster. V9 stated the dumpster lids should be kept closed to keep animals out and that food and other garbage around the dumpster could attract unwanted visitors which could lead to an infestation. On 10/17/23 at 10:23 AM, V10 (Kitchen Utility Aide) viewed the dumpster and stated that the lids to the dumpster should be closed when not being used. V10 did not know why both lids were wide opened and stated they should be closed to prevent animals from getting inside. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain residents' dignity during meals (R8, R12, R42, R68) and while using a urinary catheter drainage bag (a device in which urine drains into) for one resident (R43) in a sample of 37 residents. Findings include: On 10/17/2023 at 12:07 PM, R12, R42, and R68 were sitting at the same table in the dining room for lunch services. R42 and R68 had their lunch plates and were eating. R12 did not have a lunch plate. R12 only had lemonade and a cup of tea. V4 (Server) was plating and serving lunch plates to other residents at different tables. When surveyor went to the counter where V4 was plating, surveyor did not observe R12's meal ticket on the counter. At 12:13 PM, R12 stated I hope they bring my lunch plate sooner than later. At this time, R42 completed their lunch meal. At 12:15 PM, V4 served R12's lunch plate. Facility's Resident Food Services policy, last revised 01/2022, documents in part: Meals are served in a manner that enhances each resident's dignity and in an environment that is home inspired.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to label/date 3 (R25, R32, R56) of 3 residents oxygen tubing, failed to properly store 2 (R32, R56) of 2 residents oxygen tubing and 1 (R32) nebulizer set up to prevent contamination, failed to change R56's oxygen humidifier bottle, and failed to have an oxygen in use signage posted for 1 (R42) resident reviewed for oxygen therapy in a sample of 18. Findings Include: R32 has diagnosis not limited to Acquired Absence of Bilateral Breasts and Nipples, Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of Unspecified Deep Veins of Lower Extremity, Bilateral, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Anxiety Disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation, Emphysema, Moderate Persistent Asthma, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Shortness of Breath, Solitary Pulmonary Nodule and Tachycardia. R32 MDS (Minimum Data Set) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 15 indicating intact cognitive response. R32 physician order document in part: O2 (oxygen) at 4L (liters) per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff wore the proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) during medication administration for 1 (R27) resident. This failure has the potential to affect 28 residents residing on the third floor. Findings include: R27 has diagnosis not limited to Cerebral Infarction, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Congenital Hiatus Hernia, Dysarthria and Anarthria, Dysphagia, Gastrostomy, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Hemorrhage, Iron Deficiency Anemia Secondary To Blood Loss (Chronic), Long Term (Current) Use of Anticoagulants, Major Depressive Disorder, Mixed Hyperlipidemia, Myasthenia Gravis, Cholelithiasis, Lack of Coordination, Pulmonary Embolism, Secondary Gout, Multiple Sites, Parkinson's Disease, Personal History of Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), Slow Transit Constipation, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Dementia and Weakness. On 10/17/23 at 11:17 AM V3 (Registered Nurse)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to make sure a resident's call light was in place. Due to the call light not being in place, the resident fell out of bed and sustained an injury. This failure affects one of three residents (R2) reviewed for falls with injury in a total sample of three residents. Findings include: R2 is [AGE] year-old male. R2's diagnoses are but not limited to high blood pressure, arthritis of both hips, and irregular heartbeat. R2's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) dated 07/23/2023, notes R2 is alert. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 07/23/2023, notes R2 requires extensive two-person assistance. R2's fall risk assessment dated [DATE], notes R2 is high risk for falls and his call light must be in reach. Progress note dated 07/17/2023, notes night supervisor informed writer that resident was on the floor. Resident was yelling for help. Writer went in to see the resident and resident was on the floor lying on his right side. His head was under the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,350 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $16,350 — penalty dated 2026-05-16
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-13 for 16 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARAIZA, EMA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2013 |
| MARNERIS, RAYMOND | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/23/2025 |
| MCGEE, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/23/2025 |
| THE WASHINGTON AND JANE SMITH HOME | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/03/2025 |
| JATIS, MARTI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2012 |
| SADOK, SMAIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/03/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145904. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.