Nexus at Columbia
253 Bradington Drive, Columbia, IL 62236 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 119 certified beds · (618) 281-6800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $338,854 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-30)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.6% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 89.6% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.5% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.5% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.4% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.5% | 21.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.4% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 20.4% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.7% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.2% | 13.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.39 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.45 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.7%CMS range 30.4–49.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.9%CMS range 6.6–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 5.1–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.39 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 103.8 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-30 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) to an unresponsive resident for 1 of 1 (R2) resident reviewed for CPR in the sample of 6.This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy that began on [DATE] and resulted in the death of R2, who had an unknown code status and was found breathless and unresponsive and did not receive lifesaving Cardiopulmonary Recusation efforts.On [DATE] at 11:39 AM V1, Administrator, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), and V9, [NAME] President of Clinical Operations, were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. The surveyor confirmed by interview and record review, the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on [DATE], but remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training.Findings Include: R2's Undated Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a medical diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Cirrhosis of Liver,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident verbal and physical abuse for 1 of 8 residents (R2) reviewed of abuse in a sample of 8. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 12/19/24, when V6, R2's brother, who was known to have a history of abusing R2, was allowed to have unsupervised visits with R2 and verbally abused her. Subsequently, on 12/29/24, V6 verbally and physically abused R2. Using a reasonable person concept, this would have caused psychosocial harm resulting in feelings of being unsafe, sadness, fear, and humiliation. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 12/19/24, when the facility failed to prevent V6 from verbally abusing R2 and implement interventions to prevent future abuse. On 12/29/24, V6 again verbally and physically abused R2. On 1/7/25, at 11:00 AM, V2, Assistant Administrator, and V3, Director of Nursing (DON), were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. The surveyors confirmed by interview and record review, the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 1/9/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for 4 of 10 residents (R3, R11, R55, R74) reviewed for falls in the sample of 33. Findings Include: 1. R55's Fall Care Plan, dated 10/25/22 and 8/2/22, documents R55 is at risk for falls related to impaired cognition, activities of daily living deficit, weakness, and medication. The goal will remain free of falls causing hospitalizations related to injury through next review. On 8/19/22 (interventions include), visual reminder in room and bathroom to use the call light, evaluate cause of falls, gather and assess information on past falls, (review) medication ordered, staff to assist resident with activity (and) set up (the) television. This care plan did not document a fall intervention for the fall of 6/15/22. R55's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R55 is severely cognitively impaired. For transfer and bed mobility she is an extensive assist of one staff person. R55's MDS also documents R55's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident physical abuse in 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 5. This failure resulted in R2 feeling unsafe in the facility and being hit in the breast. Findings include: 1. R1's Undated Face Sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has the following medical diagnoses: Metabolic Encephalopathy, Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Liver and Intrahepatic Bile Duct, Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Unspecified Site, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R1 is cognitively intact. R1's Undated Care Plan documents R1 is at risk for abuse and neglect related to interaction with staff and peers and poly-medication use. R1 has aggressive, inappropriate, attention-seeking, and/or maladaptive behavior. R2's Undated Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has the following medical diagnoses Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure residents wear treated in a dignified manner by providing timely toileting assistance and respecting the resident's right to a home-like environment for 2 of 6 residents (R1 and R4) reviewed for resident's rights in the sample of 6. This failure caused R1 to feel like V4 was mean to R1, resulting in R1 crying, and R4 feeling a little depressed. Findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet, dated 4/23/2025, documents R1 has diagnoses including, but not limited to, Morbid Obesity, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Weakness, Reduce Mobility, Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety Disorder. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R1 is cognitively intact and is dependent of toileting hygiene. The Facility's CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) Staffing Assignment, dated 4/20/2025, documents V4 and V11 were assigned to R1's hall. It further documents V9 and V10 were assigned to 200 hall. On 4/22/2025 at 7:30 PM, V16, R1's sister,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse, from a resident with a history of prior altercations, for 2 of 2 (R2 and R5) residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. This resulted in R2 receiving physical harm, facial bruising, including right cheek, bridge of her nose, and below both eyes and utilizing the reasonable person concept, this failure resulted in psychosocial harm by R2 yelling out in fear Hit me one more time and I swear. Findings Include: R5's Facesheet documents an admission date of 6/2/2023. Diagnosis include Dementia, Displaced Intertrochanteric Fracture of Right Femur, Subsequent Encounter for Routine Healing, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Protein Calorie Malnutrition, and Cirrhosis of the Liver. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R5 is severely cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R5 requires substantial/maximum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer was done for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for transfers in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R3 being sent to the hospital and receiving 7 staples to his head. Findings include: R3's Physician Order Sheet for January 2024 documents a diagnosis of Unspecified Protein calorie malnutrition, Need for assistance with personal care, weakness, other reduced mobility, deforming dorsopathies, dysphagia, polyp of colon, barretts esophagus without dysphasia, disorientation, abnormal weight loss, Personal history of traumatic brain injury. R3 has an order for pureed diet, health shakes twice a day, super cereal at breakfast, and fortified pudding at lunch and dinner. Resident is also supposed to wear hip protectors every shift. R3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents R3 was severely impaired for cognition. For eating he requires substantial /maximal assistance, dependent on staff for toileting, is dependent on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory therapy is administered with a physician's order and monitored during administration for 3 of 4 residents (R1, R2 and R3) reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 7. This failure resulted in R2's oxygen blood saturation levels being low, emergency service being dispatched, and R2 being sent to local hospital for medical evaluation. Findings include: 1.R2's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated August 2023, documents a R2 had diagnoses of Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, weakness, need for assistance with personal care, acute on chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, hepatic encephalopathy, acquired absence of left leg below the knee, cardiac arrhythmia, and aortic valve stenosis. R2's Physician Order Sheet did not have an order for R2 to receive oxygen. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R2 was moderately impaired for cognition for decision making of activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy. This failure placed residents at risk of both physical and verbal abuse from a resident with a known history of verbal and physical abuse toward other residents. This affected 4 of 4 residents (R39, R57, R63 and R240) in a sample of 33 reviewed for abuse. This failure led to R63 being afraid to be in R63's room due to verbal abuse from R57, R39's wound on face being re-injured and R240 being verbally and physically abused by R57. Findings include: 1. R39's admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documents cognitively impaired and displayed no behaviors. R57's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documents severely cognitively impaired and displayed no behaviors. R57's Care Plan, dated 6/9/2021 documents displayed symptoms towards others. Resident can become verbally and physically aggressive with others which includes staff and peers. There are no progressive interventions documented on R57's care plan since…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 11.Findings include: 1-R4's Face Sheet documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R4 was moderately cognitively impaired and ambulated via wheelchair. R4's Care Plan intervention last reviewed 2/12/26 documents R4 is at risk for abuse and neglect. On 4/30/26 at 8:37 AM, V5, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated R4 came to her and told her someone hit him, then showed her a bruise on his left arm. V5 called V1, Administrator, to tell her about the allegation. On 4/28/26 at 3:10 PM, R4 stated he was going down the hall the other day and asked R5 to move and she just punched him in the arm. He stated this was witnessed by V27, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and another staff he cannot remember. On 4/29/26 at 1:30 PM, V1 stated she was not aware of R4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 11.Findings include: 1- R4's Face Sheet documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R4 was moderately cognitively impaired and ambulated via wheelchair. R4's Care Plan intervention last reviewed 2/12/26 documents R4 is at risk for abuse and neglect. On 4/29/26 at 8:37 AM, V5, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated R4 came to her and told her someone hit him and showed him a bruise on his left arm. V5 called V1, Administrator, to inform her of R4's allegation. On 4/28/26 at 3:10 PM, R4 stated he was going down the hall the other day and asked R5 to move when she just punched him in the arm. R4 had a light purple circular area on the back side of his left arm measuring approximately two inches in diameter. He stated this was witnessed by V27,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers for 4 of 4 (R1, R11, R12, R15) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily living in a sample of 15. Findings include: The facility's Resident Council Minutes, dated 12/5/2025, documents 400 hall not getting showers. On 2/18/2025 at 2:50 PM Requested January's shower documentation. As of 2/19/2025 at 4:21 PM the facility had not provided any shower documentation for January. 1. The facility's 400 Hall Shower Sheet documents R1's scheduled showers are on Wednesday and Saturday, day shift. R1's Shower/Bathe task documents R1 received a shower on 1/25, 2/13 and 2/17/2025. On 2/1, 2/5, 2/8, and 2/15 documents not applicable. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R1 is cognitively intact. On 2/10/2025 at 12:20 PM, R1 stated the shower room on 500 hall doesn't have heat and doesn't have hot water. R1 stated because of his size, he is not able to take a shower, because the 400 hall doesn't have a large enough equipment for him to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food at a palatable temperature for 4 of 4 residents (R13, R14, R15, R1) in a sample of 15. Findings Include: The (facility) Grievance/Concern reporting form, dated 2/6/2025, documents Resident council concerns relates to dietary. The resident Council met on 2/6/25. Most concerns were dietary, or food related. 4. The wire racks with room trays does not keep the food warm. The food is cold when the resident receives it. Investigation: met with regional dietary manager bases and lids to keep food warm. On 2/18/2025 at 12:40 PM, hall trays were prepared. Each tray had a lid, but no base. The plate was placed directly on the tray that was placed on a wire cart. The hall cart left the kitchen at 12:45 PM and sat at the nurse's station. First tray removed 12:48 PM and completed at 12:53 PM. Temperature tested on sample plate from the metal hall cart. The pasta and ground beef mix temped at 126 degrees and the green beans temped at 120…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Power of Attorney of medication changes for 1 of 3 (R5) residents reviewed for notification in a sample of 15. Findings include: R5's Care Plan, dated 10/21/2023, documents PSYCHOTROPIC MEDS: (R5) requires the use of psychotropic medication, Risperidone to assist with managing mood and behavior related to DX (diagnosis) Huntington Disease; anxiety and metabolic encephalopathy. ANXIETY MEDS: (R5) requires the use of anxiety medication, Clonazepam and Ativan to assist with managing anxiety related to DX Huntington Disease; anxiety and metabolic encephalopathy. DEPRESSION MEDS: (R5) requires the use of depression medication, Fluoxetine and Mirtazapine to assist with managing depression related to DX Huntington Disease; anxiety and metabolic encephalopathy. R5's admission Record, not dated, lists Huntington's Disease as diagnosis. R5's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 11/09/24 Fluoxetine HCl Oral Tablet 20 MG (Fluoxetine HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression. 1/15/2025 Seroquel Oral Tablet 100…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent for psychotropic medication for 1 of 3 (R5) residents reviewed for unneccessary medication in a sample of 15. Findings include: R5's Care Plan, dated 10/21/2023, documents PSYCHOTROPIC MEDS: (R5) requires the use of psychotropic medication, Risperidone to assist with managing mood and behavior related to DX (diagnosis) Huntington Disease; anxiety and metabolic encephalopathy. ANXIETY MEDS: (R5) requires the use of anxiety medication, Clonazepam and Ativan to assist with managing anxiety related to DX Huntington Disease; anxiety and metabolic encephalopathy. DEPRESSION MEDS: (R5) requires the use of depression medication, Fluoxetine and Mirtazapine to assist with managing depression related to DX Huntington Disease; anxiety and metabolic encephalopathy. R5's admission Record, not dated, lists Huntington's Disease as diagnosis. R5's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 11/09/24, documents Fluoxetine HCl Oral Tablet 20 MG (Fluoxetine HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression. 1/15/2025 Seroquel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-13 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were alternated with the Nurse Practitioner visits every 60 days after the first 90 days of admission for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R6 and R7) reviewed for physicians' visits in the sample of 8. Findings include: 1.R1's Face Sheet, dated 12/31/24, documented R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia, diabetes, weakness, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), convulsions, depression, hemiplegia, cardiomyopathy, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented R1 is cognitively alert. He uses a wheelchair for mobility due to right sided weakness. R1's Care Plan, dated 12/26/24, documented R1 is a bleeding risk, he has a self-care deficit with activities of daily living (ADLS), diabetic risk, seizure risk, skin complication risk, altered communication, heart failure risk, and fall risk. R1's electronic medical record (EMR) documented he was seen by the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin and allegations of abuse to the Administrator and Illinois Department of Public Health for 2 of 4 residents (R2, R8) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 8. Findings include: 1. R2's Face Sheet documented R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, severe protein-calories malnutrition, diabetes, dysphagia, dementia, schizoaffective bipolar disorder, wedge compression fracture of the third lumbar vertebra, severe intellectual disabilities, hyperlipidemia, rheumatoid arthritis, heart failure, osteoporosis, Down syndrome, vascular dementia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. R2's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE], documented R2 is severely cognitively impaired with minimal hearing deficit. She requires substantial assistance with eating and is dependent on staff for all other activities of daily living, (ADL's). R2's Care Plan, dated 12/21/24, documented R2 is at risk for abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to investigate allegations of verbal abuse and injury of unknown origin for one of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for investigation of abuse in the sample of 8. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet, undated, documents R2 has diagnoses of diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, severe protein-calories malnutrition, dementia, schizoaffective bipolar disorder, severe intellectual disabilities, Down syndrome, and vascular dementia. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents resident is severely cognitively impaired with minimal hearing deficit. R2's MDS documents she requires substantial assistance with eating and is dependent on staff for all other activities of daily living (ADL's). R2's Progress noted, dated 10/2/24 at 10:23 AM, documents V20, Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN, was notified by V17, CNA, that while performing morning care, she noticed a 3x3cemtmeter (cm) bruise on R2's left upper arm. V17 notified V20 who evaluated the bruise of unknown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-25 · tag F0800 — widespreadProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to provide the required amount of protein to serve the residents. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings Include: The facility recipe for Oven Herb Roasted Turkey Breast documents, slices 2.5 ounces of weighed portions. Serve 2.5 ounces of weighed portions to provide 2 ounces protein serving. Use scale to weigh and portion accurately. The facility was not observed initially utilizing a scale to weigh the turkey portions. V21, District Manager, stated, It's about one slice per person. On 10/22/24 at 12:00 PM, the kitchen was serving oven herb roasted turkey, with the portions appearing small. On 10/22/24 at 12:05 PM, V21, District Manager, brought out the scale. The oven roasted turkey breast portion was weighed and it was only 2 ounces. They continued to serve out the 2 ounces of oven sliced turkey, which was one slice of turkey meat. The kitchen then ran out of the oven sliced turkey and had to offer a substitute. On 10/23/24 at 12:00 PM, V12, Dietary Manager, stated, I don't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to employ hygienic practices and then handled food. This has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. Findings Include: On 10/22/24 at 12:15 PM, V23, Dietary Aide, was putting diet cards on the residents trays; she was also putting lids on the resident's tray. V23, Dietary Aide, was rubbing her nose repeatedly and rubbing sweat off the brow. The Direct Care staff were standing at the kitchen door asking her to wash her hands, but she seemed confused and did not wash her hands. V14, Area Manager, asked V23, Dietary Aide, to wash her hands. V23, Dietary Aide, then washed her hands, but immediately rubbed her nose again. V23, Dietary Aide, continued to scoop ice cream from a 5-gallon ice cream bucket and place it into bowls. V23 gave the ice cream to the direct care staff to distribute to the residents. On 10/23/24 at 12:05 PM, V26, Regional Director of Dining, stated she (V23, Dietary Aide) will no longer be on the tray line. She (V23, Dietary Aide) will have other duties. The Facility Policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respect a resident's right to privacy and dignity during care and when care was needed by being on their cell phones in 4 of 4 residents (R60, R61, R87, R94) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 45. Findings include: 1. On 10/23/24 at 10:00 AM, during the resident council meeting, R60 stated the CNAs are always on their cell phones; he has had one CNA that was on speaker mode on her cell phone while she was helping R60 in the bathroom, so he felt as though no privacy was being provided. 2. On 10/23/24 at 10:00 AM, during the resident council meeting, R61 stated the CNAs are always on their cell phones, when residents are needing assistance, they are ignored because the CNA is on their phone and the CNAs are on their phones while providing care. 3. On 10/23/24 at 10:00 AM, during the resident council meeting, R87 stated the CNAs (Certified Nurses Assistant) are always on their cell phones and don't respond to the resident's request for care because they are too busy on their phones. 4. On 10/23/24 at 10:00 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide personal hygiene to 2 of 2 residents (R2, R43), reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living Care) in the sample of 45. Findings include: 1. On 10/22/24 at 8:53 AM, R2 was observed in bed. R2's mouth was dirty with debris in it; skin on her face was dry and flaky; her hair was messy; and her nails were dirty and untrimmed. R2's Face Sheet, undated, documents R2 has a diagnosis of Hemiplegia, Weakness, Need for Assistance with Personal Care and Dementia. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 10/1/24, documents R2 is dependent with hygiene. R2's Care Plan, dated 10/20/15, documents R2 has an ADL self-care performance deficit and requires extensive assistance of 1-2 staff for personal hygiene and oral care. 2. On 10/22/24 at 8:50 AM, R43 was observed in her room in bed. R43's mouth was dirty with debris; her hair was messy; her gown was dirty; her nails were dirty and untrimmed. R43's Face Sheet, undated, documents R43 has a diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 resident (R81) received medications as ordered out of 4 residents reviewed for medications in the sample of 45. Findings include: R81's Face Sheet, undated, documents he was admitted to the facility in Hospice care on 8/2/24. R81's Face Sheet undated documents medical diagnosis as Cerebral Infarction, Unspecified Infarction Unspecified, Epilepsy, Unspecified, Not Intractable, Without Status Epilepticus, Dementia in Other Disease Classified Elsewhere, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, Anxiety, and Nutritional Anemia. R81's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents severe cognitive impairment. Nurse Progress Notes, dated 8/19/24, documents R81 was given the medication of another resident (R94). Medication error report, dated 8/19/24, documents V24, Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN, an agency nurse, went in to give R94 his medications. R81 responded to R94's name. R81 was given…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment for 3 of 6 residents (R1, R3, R4), reviewed for safe/functional/sanitary/comfortable environment in the sample of 6. Findings include: On 7/31/24 at 8:30 AM, the 300/400 hall shower room was observed with a foul odor of feces, dirty clothing on the floor, a bag of dirty linen on the floor, and the toilet had toilet paper in it; no feces noted. On 8/1/24 at 8:20 AM, the 300/400 hall shower room was observed with a foul odor of feces. On 7/31/24 at 8:05 AM, R1 stated he takes care of himself, takes his own showers, and puts on clean clothes every day. R1 stated he has to clean up the shower room before he can take a shower because it is dirty. On 7/31/24 at 8:05 AM, R3 stated he gives himself a shower every other night. R3 stated the shower room on the 400 hall always has dirty clothes and towels on the floor, some still with feces in them. R3 stated housekeeping doesn't go in the shower rooms to clean, and the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) aren't going to do it, so he has to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to cohort residents with the same infectious conditions and follow infection control protocol for COVID-19. This has the potential to affect all 112 residents in the facility. Findings Include: 1.The Facility's Infection Surveillance Monthly Report, dated 7/16/24, documents R5 and R6 were both positive for Covid-19 on 7/6/24. The July Infection Surveillance report documents there are 48 residents in the facility with Covid-19 infection. On 7/16/2024 at 9:00 AM, V10, OT (Occupational Therapist), was in R5 and R6's room with a N95 mask intact, no other PPE noted. V10 stated she thought they (R5 & R6) were off (isolation) today. Contact/droplet precautions signage was on the R5's and R6's door of the room they were residing in. On 7/16/24 At 10:00 AM on 500 Hall, isolation carts were on the hall. V8, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was on the hall with N95 mask intact. V8 stated, Gowns, gloves, and masks are placed on when in the resident's room, providing care. We do have some residents that are positive for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — isolatedReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify positive COVID test results to Family Representatives and or Power of Attorney for 2 of 4 residents (R3 and R4) reviewed for COVID notification in the sample of 4. Findings Include: 1. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R3 is moderately cognitively impaired. R3's Physician Order Sheet, dated 7/9/24, documents strict contact/droplet isolation related to COVID until 7/20/24 for all services rendered in room. R3's Nurses Note for 7/9/24 did not document her responsible party was notified of her being COVID positive. R3' s Electronic Health Record documents the facility's electronic messaging system, dated 7/15/24, a message was left about COVID in the building. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) did not document any other messages were left. The facility's COVID Line list documents their first COVID case for this outbreak was dated 6/30/24, and an electronic messaging system message was not sent out to R3's POA (Power of Attorney)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications timely to 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for Pharmacy Services in the sample of 4. Findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet, undated, documents the following diagnoses: Metabolic Encephalopathy, Type 2 Diabetes, Cerebral Infarction, HTN (Hypertension), CKD (Chronic Kidney Disease), HLD (Hyperlipidemia), Depression, Dementia, Muscle Weakness, Malaise, Disorientation and Vitamin Deficiency. R1's Care Plan, dated 3/29/24, documents the following: R1 is at risk for Hypo/Hyperglycemia related to her diagnosis of diabetes, has a diagnosis of Hyperlipidemia, has the potential for altered cardiac function related to hypertension, is at risk for pain/discomfort, requires the use of psychotropic medications, all with an intervention to administer medications as ordered. R1's MAR (Medication Administration Record), dated 6/2024, documents the following physician orders: 3/21/24 - Amlodipine 10 mg (milligrams) Qd (daily) for HTN(hypertension); 3/21/24 - Furosemide 20 mg Qd for HTN,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure resident clothes were being maintained, cleaned, and returned in a timely manner for 6 out of 13 residents (R1, R2, R6, R7,R8, R9 and R13) reviewed for laundry in the sample of 13. 1-R9's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 5/8/2024, documents R9 was cognitively intact for decision making of activities of daily living. On 5/24/2024 at 7:55 AM, R9 stated, Laundry is a mess here and I mean a mess. You never get your clothes back and they want you to wear someone else's clothes. Your clothes are not treated as important. They always have an excuse of why your clothes are missing or why they can't seem to find them, or worse they find them but then they have white spots all over them. I don't want to talk about it because it upsets me so much. 2-R6's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R6 was cognitively intact for decision making of activities of daily living. On 5/24/2024 at 12:20 PM, R6 stated she has been missing clothes and at times it takes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the Facility failed to provide food that is appetizing and at palatable temperatures for 7 of 8 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R6, R8, R9) reviewed for food palatability in the sample of 11. Findings include: 1.R9's Minumum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R9 was cognitively intact for decision making for activities of daily living. On 5/24/2024 at 7:55 AM, R9 stated, The food has really gone downhill. I eat in the dining room, and the food is cold when it is served to us most of the time. This morning breakfast was okay, but here lately it has been cold. Staff don't want to take the time to warm it for you. 2. R8's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R8 was cognitively intact for decision making of activities of daily living. On 5/24/2024 at 8:03 AM, R8 stated the food is cold a lot. 3. R2's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R2 was cognitively intact for decision making of activities of daily living. On 5/24/24 at 9:58 AM, R2 stated he eats in both the dining room and his room, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) in the facility for 8 hours daily. This has the potential to affect all 107residents living in the facility. Findings Include: The Facility Staff Schedules were reviewed from 4/1/24 through 4/30/24, with no issues for the Certified Nursing Assistant. The Registered Nurse (RN) Staffing Schedule was reviewed for 4/1/24 through 4/30/24, and it appeared there was an RN for eight hours every shift. The Time Cards for V13, Registered Nurse, did not document he was staying until 8:00 AM Sunday 4/7, 4/14, 4/21; for these Sundays the facility did not have an RN for eight hours, because V13 was supposed to work from 12:00 AM to 8:00AM, so the facility would meet it's requirement of a Registered Nurse for 8 hours on Sundays. On 5/2/24 at 2:35 PM, V1, Administrator, stated, Our ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) works on the floor Monday through Friday and we have another RN (Registered Nurse) that works for 11:00PM to 8:00 AM on Friday and Saturdays. The facility policy Staffing, dated 9/23, documents,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and assess an arteriovenous shunt for one of two residents (R2) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 7. Findings Include: R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 4/2/2024, documents R2 is severely cognitively impaired. R2's Nurses Note, dated 4/14/24, documents, (R2) moan when left arm was touched. Has large shunt like in left arm. Husband notified. States 'for resident to go to(Regional Hospital) for evaluation' Hospital called report given. R2's (Regional Hospital) After Summary Visit Report, dated 4/14/24, documents, You were sent to the Emergency Department for evaluation of your left upper extremity. Per review of your chart you had a aterio venous shunt (AVShunt) placed in 2019 by vascular surgery to facilitate dialysis there is normal thrill in that site and no external malfunction. R2's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 4/16/24, documents, Dialysis Limb Precations: currentlty not in use. no blood pressure, no accuchecks, no blood draws, no IV's (inravenous) to: left arm every shift.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse in 4 of 4 residents, (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. Findings include: 1. R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, severe intellectual disabilities, metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, schizoaffective disorder, heart failure, repeated falls, and dementia. R2's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R2 was severely cognitively impaired, used wheelchair, and required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility and transfer. R2's Care Plan, last reviewed 4/4/24, documents R2 is at risk for abuse and neglect due to cognitive impairment and use of psychotropic medications. The Care Plan also documents, (R2) exhibits a very strong bond with (V3, R2's Family), and growing up, tough love was shown in their home to ensure (R2)'s needs were met. Interventions added include assuring resident is in a safe and secure environment. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to report allegations of abuse in 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. Findings include: On 4/16/24 at 12:10 PM, V10, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was feeding R2 lunch in the 300-hallway. R2 was slumped over and was not interviewable. V10 stated, (V3) yells at (R2) all the time, and it makes me so mad. They say he has been reported numerous times. He usually yells at her, but I seen him do that (pushed on her own forehead with 2 fingers pushing head back) once. I wanted to punch him. I reported that too. The Facility's Written Statement from V4, EMS, (Emergency Medical Services), on 4/11/24 documents, EMS was dispatched to (Facility) for an unrelated call to the incident, during the call EMS myself (V4), (V5), (V6), and (V8), heard vulgar yelling coming from down the hallway, EMS was leaving the 300 hallway toward the nurses station, and passed the room that the yelling was coming from. I slowed down to look inside and saw a male holding a female resident by the back of the neck yelling at her to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to investigate allegation of abuse in 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. Findings include: 1-On 4/16/24 at 12:10 PM, V10, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated, (V3) yells at (R2) all the time, and it makes me so mad. They say he has been reported numerous times. (V3) usually yells at (R2) but I seen him do (pushed her own forehead backwards forcefully with two fingers) that once. I wanted to punch him. I reported that too. V10 stated this incident happened around 5-6 months ago. The Facility's Written Statement from V4, EMS (Emergency Medical Services), on 4/11/24 documents, EMS was dispatched to (Facility) for an unrelated call to the incident, during the call EMS myself (V4), (V5), (V6), and (V8), heard vulgar yelling coming from down the hallway, EMS was leaving the 300 hallway toward the nurses station, and passed the room that the yelling was coming from. I slowed down to look inside and saw a male holding a female resident by the back of the neck yelling at her to keep her head up, he then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of biohazardous material in a proper way to prevent the transmission of infections. This failure has the potential to affect all 108 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 1/24/24 at 9:20 AM, the 100-hall soiled utility room was observed with no red biohazard bags or biohazard box noted in the room. On 1/24/24 at 9:25 AM, the 300-hall soiled utility room was observed with a red biohazard bag with material in it, sitting on the counter, not secured properly. There was no biohazard box in the room. On 1/24/24 at 9:55 AM, the 500-hall soiled utility room was observed with several unused biohazard boxes and red biohazard bags available to staff. On 1/24/24 at 8:40 AM, V1, Administrator, stated they use a biohazardous waste company to remove the biohazardous material. V1 stated they made a pickup last week. On 1/24/24 at 8:50 AM, V3, Environmental Director, stated they use the red biohazard bags, those bags are placed in the soiled utility rooms until they are picked up by the biohazard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for investigations in the sample of 12. Findings include: On 1/3/2024 at 2:04 PM, V1, Administrator, stated, (R2) is currently at the hospital. He was upset because back in August there was an incident with him and V4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). He accused (V4) of hitting him. I did an investigation, and the Nurse Practitioner (V8) was in the room the entire time and was a witness and she stated, at no time did the staff member hit or strike (R2). (R2) was verbally abusive to (V4) and threw water on her and went off on her when she was trying to give him his medication. (V8) was in the room the whole time, the curtain was not pulled, and she was able to view everything. When (V4) exited the room, her clothes were soaked/wet. Anyway, I suspended (V4) and did the investigation, but I did not substantiate it because there was a witness. I moved (V4) to another hall. (R2) then saw (V4) yesterday working on the hallway and (R2) became upset…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement safety measures and failed to make sure the bed was properly maintained for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for falls in a sample of 4. Findings include: R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R1 is cognitively intact. R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documents R1 has diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction; Muscle Weakness; Hemiplegia Unspecified Dominant Right Side; Restless Leg Syndrome; Difficulty in Walking; and Fusion of Spine. R1's Nurses Notes, dated 12/4/23, documents nurse observed resident on floor at bedside on buttocks. She (R1) stated she (R1) was attempting to transfer from wheelchair to bed when her (R1) bed moved causing her to fall. Resident (R1) had the appropriate footwear, however, bed was unable to lock. No injuries noted and resident (R1) denies pain and discomfort. Education provided on the use of call light for further assistance. R1's Care Plan, dated 10/26/23, documents Focus Fall: Resident (R1) is at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to develop/implement a Care Plan focus area to address compliance with tube feedings and recommendations to remain elevated after feedings for one of two residents (R25) reviewed for tube feeding in the sample of 35. Findings Include: R25's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents R25 is cognitively intact. R25's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 7/20/23, documents R25 is NPO (nothing by mouth). R25's POS, dated 8/11/23, documents water flush 200ML (milliliters) additional water in between feedings. R25's POS, dated 8/14/23, documents Osmolite 1.5 340ML four times per day. (bolus) On 8/31/23 at 2:00PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, We don't have a Tube Feeding Care Plan, it is included with the ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and Hydration Care Plans. The ADL Care Plan dated 8/8/23 only documents R25 received feeding/nutrition through gastric feedings. R25's Hydration Care Plan only documents R25 is at risk for alteration in fluid volume r/t…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update care plans for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for care plans in the sample of 8. Findings include: 1. R1's Physician's Order Sheet (POS) documents R1 had diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic kidney disease, stage 3, congestive heart failure, and dementia. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents she was cognitively intact for decision making of activities of daily living. On 8/17/2023 at 4:50 PM, R1 was in the dining room. Oxygen tank was on the back of her wheelchair, but the tubing was in the back, not within reach of R1. R1 was not wearing any nose cannula and was not getting any oxygen. On 8/17/2023 at 5:05 PM, R1 stated, I am supposed to be on oxygen 24 hours, seven days a week. R1's Care Plan, undated, was reviewed and does not document she is on oxygen or needs oxygen therapy. There were no goals and or interventions documented for the use of oxygen. 2. R2's POS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enough staff were working for meeting the needs of residents for 5 of 5 residents (R2, R5, R6, R7 and R8) reviewed for staffing in the sample of 7. Findings include: Staffing schedules were reviewed and documents on the 200-hall, there was a call off/no show for the nurse on 7/31/2023 for the day shift. No nurse was documented as working the 200-hall on 7/31/2023. The 200 hall documents, V17, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), NCNS (No call, no show). On 8/17/2023 at 2:23 PM, V16, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, I was working the day (R2) was having issues with his oxygen back in July. He was not his normal self when I saw him. I was not working his hall that morning, but I was working my hall. (R2) was on the 200-hall I was working the 100-hall. I am not sure what nurse was supposed to be working the 200-hall, but it was not me. I was assigned to a different hall. I did not see a nurse or talk to any nurse that was working (R2's) hall that morning he was having issues. Nobody told me to cover the 200-hall and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor and assess residents for frequency of bowel movements to prevent constipation and fecal impaction for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for quality of care to prevent constipation and fecal impaction in a sample of 4. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet, print date of 08/09/23, documents R2 has diagnoses of Slow transit constipation, personal history of traumatic brain injury, dysphasia, hypertension, and intellectual disabilities. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R2 is severely cognitively impaired, and R2 requires total dependence with bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use, is always incontinent of bladder, and for bowel it documents Bowel- (9)- not rated the resident had an ostomy or did not have a bowel movement for the entire 7 days. R2's Care Plan, with an admission date of 05/12/23, documents, (R2) has a bowel elimination problem related to constipation. At risk for complications. R2's Care Plan Goal documents (R2)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse in 3 of 4 residents (R46, R57, R74) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 33. Findings include: 1. R57's Nurse's Note, dated 7/7/2022 at 10:27 PM, documents, Noted skin tear to left hand V-shaped, applied steri strips, resident has been wheeling her w/c, (wheelchair), all over and went out to the doctor's today, will continue to monitor. R57's Nurse's Note, dated 7/9/2022 at 6:21 PM, documents, Writer was informed of resident injured. Resident approached with a towel on left hand. Calmed resident able to see hand, 4 inches by 1 inch skin tear on left hand. Resident stated, she does not know how it happened. Incident was un-witnessed. Cleaned wound applied TAO, (triple antibiotic ointment), and dry dressing. Attempted to notify family, Notified MD, (physician.) R57's Skin Issue form, dated 7/9/2022, documents, Resident was taken to writer, she was holding a towel on her left hand and crying. Writer cleaned hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record, the facility failed to follow Physician's Orders and administer Intravenous Antibiotics (IV) for 1 of 3 residents (R238) in a sample of 33. Findings include: R238's Face Sheet, dated 11/15/2022, documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses sacralities, (inflammation of sacrum), osteomyelitis of vertebra, lumbar region and Proteus, (Mirabilis), (Morganii). R238's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents the resident was alert, and she was on an IV antibiotic for 3 days. R238's Physician's Order Sheet, documents 8/26/2022 Ceftriaxone, one 2 grams, (gm), intravenously in the evening, related to Proteus, (Mirabilis), (Morganii), until 9/14/2022 pull first dose out of e-kit, (medication emergency medication kit supple system), 1 gm per 30 minutes; order is for 2 gm so that equals 2 bags per 30 minutes. The Facility's Back Up Medication e-Kit List, documents, Ceftriaxone 2 gm was in the e-kit. R238's Nurse's Note, dated 8/26/2022, no documentation; R238's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide effective pain management in 1 of 2 residents (R14) reviewed for pain in the sample of 33. Findings include: On 11/15/22 at 9:44 AM, R14 was lying in bed in her room. She stated, her medications have been given late, and the other night she had to wait until 11:15 PM for her bedtime medications. R14 stated, I was hurting pretty bad. R14's Face Sheet documents R14 has diagnoses including low back pain, pain in unspecified hip, pain in left shoulder, pain in right shoulder, and cervicalgia, (neck pain). R14's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet), dated 9/2/22 documents, R14 is cognitively intact and has occasional moderate pain. R14's Care Plan, dated 9/2/22, documents, (R14) is at risk for complications, pain and injury related to diagnosis of arthritis, osteoporosis, history of fracture with hip surgery. (R14) will maintain acceptable level of comfort for the next 90, (days). Administer medications as directed by MD, (Medical Doctor), and monitor for side effects and effectiveness. R14's Order Summary Report, with print date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. R11's Face Sheet documents, R11 has diagnosis of urinary tract infection, site not specified. R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents, R11 is significantly cognitively impaired, requires extensive 1-plus person assistance with bed mobility, requires extensive 2-plus person assistance with transfer, and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R11's Physician Order Sheet (POS) documents, Macrobid Capsule, (Nitrofurantoin Monohyd Macro), - Give 100 mg, (milligrams), by mouth one time a day for chronic UTI, (Urinary Tract Infection), with start date of 4/29/22. R11's Care Plan, dated 10/22/22, documents, Resident is on Macrobid Capsule once daily for UTI/prophylactic use, dated 4/28/2022. R11's Medication Administration Record, (MAR) for 2022 documents, R11 received 2 doses of Macrobid in April, 31 doses of Macrobid in May, 30 doses of Macrobid, in June, 30 doses of Macrobid in July, 31 doses of Macrobid in August, 30 doses of Macrobid in September, 29 doses of Macrobid in October, and 15 doses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-01-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to dispose of trash in a proper manner. This failure has the potential to affect all 108 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 1/24/24 at 8:20 AM, the dumpster was observed outside at the back of the building. It was full, but the lid did close. On 1/24/24 at 8:30 AM, an initial tour of the building was conducted. A foul odor was noted throughout the facility. On 1/24/24 at 9:20 AM, the 100 hall soiled utility room was observed with the same foul odor as noted throughout the facility. There was trash in trash bags laying on the floor, not in a trash receptacle. On 1/24/24 at 9:25 AM, the 300 hall soiled utility room was observed with the same foul odor as noted throughout the facility. There was trash in trash bags laying on the floor, not in a trash receptacle. Red biohazard bag with material in it, sitting on the counter and was not closed. There was no biohazard container in the room. On 1/24/24 at 10:00 AM, V1, Administrator, stated the trash in the soiled utility rooms should be in a trash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$338,854 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $38,715 — penalty dated 2026-04-30
- $24,421 — penalty dated 2025-07-08
- $21,255 — penalty dated 2025-04-24
- $220,695 — penalty dated 2024-12-18
- $22,588 — penalty dated 2024-08-14
- $11,180 — penalty dated 2023-12-14
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-18 for 2 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $455K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145717. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.