Franklin Grove Living And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 83.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 68.7 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 63 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-04-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for the noon meal for the residents on pureed diets to 4 of 8 residents (R10, R59, R62 and R69) reviewed for dietary services in the sample of 18.The findings include: A facility document entitled Week at a Glance Menu documents, the menu for 4/13/26 showed rotisserie chicken, crispy fried potato with bacon, mixed vegetables, bread with margarine and cranberry short cake.On 4/13/26 during noon meal, R10, R59, R62 and R69 were served the noon meal but were not served the pureed bread with margarine.On 4/13/26 at 1:00 PM, V9 (Cook) said she did not know why the bread was not served to pureed residents which was part of the noon meal. On 4/13/26 at 1:15 PM, V9 (Dietary Manager) said the menu is carefully planned to ensure residents get the right balance of diet and must be served as scheduled on each meal.On 4/15/26/ at 11:30 AM, V14 (Dietician) said she reviews and approves the facility menu to ensure residents receive adequate nutritional value including the right amount of protein,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a resident's power of attorney (POA) of a change in condition for 1 of 4 residents (R3) reviewed for change of condition in a sample of 18.The findings include:R3's Facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R3 has severe cognitive impairment.R3's urine culture results dated 4/10/26 showed R3 was positive for an Escherichia Coli (E. coli) urinary tract infection (UTI).R3's Progress notes printed 4/14/26 showed R3 started having hematuria (blood in urine) on 4/5/26. These notes showed no contact was made with V15 (R3's POA) with R3's hematuria (4/5/26), urinalysis results (4/10/26), or the initiation of an antibiotic (4/10/26).R3's Physician Order Summary printed 4/14/26 showed R3 had an order placed for Macrobid (an antibiotic) 100 milligrams, give 1 capsule by mouth every morning and bedtime for UTI symptoms for 7 days.On 4/14/26 at 10:00 AM, V15 stated they did not know R3 was being treated for a urinary tract infection (UTI) or on an antibiotic.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an as needed anxiety medication had a stop date for one of 18 residents (R69) reviewed for psychotropics in the sample of 18. The findings include:R69's Order Summary Report dated April 14, 2026, showed that R69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including palliative care, insomnia, restlessness and agitation, history of falling, dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. An order for Ativan oral tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth every three hours as needed (PRN) for agitation/anxiety/restlessness was started on February 10, 2026. There is no stop date on this order. On April 15, 2026, at 8:58 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said as needed Ativan should have a stop date of 14 days. If the as needed medication is still needed, then the prescription needs to be done again. The nurse that enters the as needed order is responsible for putting in the stop date. The facility's Psychotropic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor a non pressure wound for one of 18 residents (R4) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 18.The findings include: R4's Order Summary Report dated April 14, 2026, shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of pulmonary embolism, unsteadiness on feet, contact dermatitis, muscle weakness, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4, major depressive disorder, and paraplegia. An order to monitor a callus to his right heel every day and evening shift was entered on September 16, 2025.R4's Treatment Administration Record dated April 1, 2026-April 30, 2026 shows staff signed off the treatment to R4's right heel twice a day from April 1-14, 2026.On April 13, 2026 at 11:29 AM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) and V5 (Wound Care Nurse/WCN) went into R4's room to change his wound dressings. V5 removed the heel boot from R4's right foot. The was a bordered gauze dressing in place to his right heel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to clean a pressure injury in a manner to prevent cross contamination and failed to have pressure injury preventions in place for three of four residents (R4, R30, R69) reviewed for pressure injury in the sample of 18.The findings include:1. R4's Order Summary Report dated April 14, 2026, shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including history of pulmonary embolism, unsteadiness on feet, contact dermatitis, muscle weakness, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4, major depressive disorder, and paraplegia. R4's Order Summary Report also show orders to: clean left gluteal wound x2 with wound cleanser, apply triad paste to wound beds and cover it with an island dressing, right gluteal wound: Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply skin prep to peri-wound and apply hydrocolloid dressing, right inferior buttock wound: Cleanse with wound cleanser, apply 1/2 Strength Dakin's solution to gauze and pack lightly, cover…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter tubing was kept off the floor for 1 of 4 residents (R37) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in the sample of 18.The findings include:R37's Care Plan with an initiated date of 4/9/24 showed R37 had a supra pubic urinary catheter.On 04/13/2026 at 10:58 AM, R37 was in a wheelchair. R37's indwelling urinary catheter tubing was dragging on the floor as R37 self-propelled himself.On 04/13/2026 at 12:02 PM, R37 self-propelled himself into the dining room. The indwelling urinary catheter tubing was dragging on the floor. On 04/13/2026 at 1:42 PM, R37 was in a common area. R37's indwelling urinary catheter tubing was resting on the floor.On 04/14/2026 at 8:44 AM, R37 was in the dining room sitting in a wheelchair. R37's indwelling urinary catheter tubing was on the floor. R37 was stepping on the tubing with his left foot.On 04/14/2026 at 12:58 PM, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant) said an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag and tubing should be kept off the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a resident with a plate guard for 1 of 2 residents (R8) reviewed for assistive devices in the sample of 18.The findings include:A facility assessment done on 3/20/26 showed R8 had limited range of motion to both upper extremities. R8's Order Summary Report printed on 04/14/26 showed an order that it was ok to use a plate guard. On 04/13/26 at 12:35 PM, R8 was served his meal. R8 was not provided with a plate guard. R8 held a spoon in his right hand and used his left hand to push mixed vegetables onto the spoon. Some of the mixed vegetables fell off onto the table. On 04/13/26 12:42 PM, R8 said the facility use to provide him with a plate guard but stopped providing the plate guard. R8 did not know why the facility stopped providing the plate guard. R8 stated the plate guard came in handy as food did not slide off the plate. R8 added that he could trap the food against the plate guard as he scooped up the food with the silverware. R8 said he could not move his fingers well. R8 attempted to move his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff wore the required personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care to a resident on enhanced barrier precautions. This applies to 2 of 18 residents (R37 and R50) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 18.The findings include: 1. R37's Care Plan with an initiated date of 4/9/24 showed R37 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a supra pubic urinary catheter. On 4/13/26 at 11:31 AM, there was an Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign on the wall next to R37's room door. On 4/13/26 at 11:31 AM, V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) emptied R37's urinary drainage bag. V12 had on gloves but no gown. On 4/13/26 at 11:34 AM, V12 said she emptied R37's urinary drainage bag. V12 confirmed the only PPE she wore was gloves. V12 said the only PPE needed when emptying a urinary drainage bag were gloves. On 4/14/26 at 12:58 PM, V13 (CNA) said a gown and gloves are to be worn when emptying a urinary drainage bag. The facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place for four of four residents (R1-R4) reviewed for safety/supervision in the sample of four. The findings include:1. R1's Face Sheet shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, diabetes, nicotine dependence, cardiomegaly, and history of falling.V1 (Administrator) stated that R1 did not have a Care Plan as he discharged from the facility the same day he was admitted .R1's Fall Scale dated January 24, 2026 shows he was a moderate risk for falling.R1's Nurses Notes dated January 24, 2026 at 4:42 PM shows R1 was admitted to the facility. R1 was transferred to the bed and family was at the bedside. R1 had a scab on his right knee with numerous bruises to both of his lower extremities. R1's Nurses Notes dated January 24, 2026 at 8:16 PM, entered by V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) shows R1 was found on the floor face down with his head near the head of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered referral to a specialist was initiated and facilitated for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for community medical appointments. The findings include: On 5/30/25 at 9:45am R1 stated he was set up with an appointment for an Orthopedic appointment at a medical center for his arthritis. R1 stated he couldn't go, and the Administrator told him he had to find his own transportation as it was too far for the facility van to take him. R1 stated he did ask to be transferred to another facility that would be closer to the medical center, however I'm still here. Office Clinic Physician Note dated 3/1/24 indicates R1 was evaluated for bilateral hand issues. Note indicates R1 has a history of a right thumb amputation due to an infection about 2 years ago. R1 reported he is unable to take care of himself due to this impairment. Note indicates R1 questioned the possibility of a transfer to create a thumb and inquired about this procedure as an option. Physical Exam indicates Exam of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $427K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL