No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Citadel at Saint Joseph Village

659 East Jefferson Street, Freeport, IL 61032 · For profit - Corporation · 124 certified beds · (815) 232-6181 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (815) 232-6181 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)5 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$125,824 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 5 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $125,824 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-02)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1009 Fairway Dr · (815) 986-4200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
721 W South St · (815) 232-6129 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1130 S Galena Ave · (815) 232-9449 · Call to confirm hours
Park
27 W Stephenson St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1001 E Empire St · (815) 233-0932

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.4%13.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%6.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms19.8%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.6%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.4%18.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.1%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.5%20.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.4%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.6%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.5%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit26.0%13.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 108 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.6%CMS range 50.4–66.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 7.5–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.6–14.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.26
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
64.9%
Total nursing turnover
73.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 91.2 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident (R1), with a urinary catheter in place, was dressed in a manner to prevent a resident injury, failed to ensure facility staff safely managed and positioned a resident's (R2) urinary catheter as the resident ambulated, and failed to ensure a resident (R3) was showered in a manner to prevent a resident fall. This failure resulted in R1 being sent to a local hospital after her skin was lacerated by a plastic clip connected to her urinary catheter as she was being dressed by facility staff. R1 required nine sutures to repair her laceration. These failures apply to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for resident safety and supervision in the sample of 3. The findings include:1.R1's hospital discharge records showed R1 was discharged to the facility on 7/28/25 for rehabilitation after being hospitalized for right leg cellulitis, lymphedema, pneumonia, and urinary retention. R1 was discharged with a urinary catheter in place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to safely reposition a resident in bed for one of seven residents (R1) reviewed for safety supervision in the sample of seven. This failure contributed to R1 experiencing multiple fractures which required a hospitalization. This past non compliance occurred from February 7, 2025 to March 8, 2025. The findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet dated March 17, 2025 shows she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including fibromyalgia, morbid obesity, spinal stenosis, cervical spine fusion, major depressive disorder, repeated falls, and pain. R1's Care Plan dated August 16, 2019 shows R1 is requiring almost total care by staff. Assist of two people for all transfers. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated February 3, 2025 shows R1 is cognitively intact. R1 requires substantial/maximal assistance for rolling left and right in bed. R1 has impairments on both sides of upper and lower extremities. R1's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] shows she has a significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide physician ordered intervention that maintained the patency of a CVC-Central Venous Catheter for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for parental fluids in the sample of 18. This failure resulted in the occlusion of R2's catheter and the need for replacement. The findings include: R2's Current Minimum Data Set on 12/11/2024 shows, R2 is cognitively intact. On 12/11/24 at10:17AM, R2 pulled up her pant leg to reveal a CVC-Central Venous Catheter in her left upper thigh that had a blue colored locking cap labeled 3.6 milliliters and a red colored locking cap labeled 3.5 milliliters. The clear lumens of the red capped and blue capped catheter had dark red blood in the tubing. At 11:00AM, V21 RN (Registered Nurse) flushed R2's CVC and removed the blood from the two lumens. On 12/10/24 at 11:49 AM, R2 said, I had to get my catheter replaced again due to it being clogged. They are supposed to flush it and are not doing it, so it keeps getting clogged. On 12/11/24 at 10:18AM, R2 said, they flushed my line yesterday,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to safely transfer a resident (R1) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for safety in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 falling, and hitting her head on the oxygen concentrator. R1's head laceration required 6 staples and 2 sutures for closure of the wound, in the emergency department. The findings include: On 9/10/24 at 10:05 AM, R1 was in wheelchair, being pushed to her room by a family member. There was dried blood and 6 stables on the top of R1's head, in her hairline. There was dried blood and scabbing along the staple line. The surveyor asked R1 if her head was sore and how it happened. R1 said her head hurt real bad when it first happened, but it was starting to get a little better. R1 said she has to take pain medication for the pain some days. R1 said on 8/27/24 she had taken a nap after lunch. R1 said she couldn't remember the CNA's (Certified Nurses Assistant) name. (Through investigation CNA identified as V13). R1 said the CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred in a safe manner to prevent injury. This failure resulted in R4 sustaining a fractured femur during a transfer on [DATE]. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for falls in a sample of 4. The findings include: R4's Facility Reported Incident dated [DATE] states, Resident, (R4) was lowered to the floor by CNA (Certified Nurses Assistant), (V9), after her knees buckled during a transfer. Resident was sent to (Local Hospital) for further evaluation. Resident returned to the facility with a diagnosis of periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur. R4's Radiographic Image of the knee, right dated [DATE] states, There is a total right knee prosthesis in place. There is a comminuted angulated periprosthetic fracture of the distal femur . On [DATE] at 8:55 AM V9 (CNA) stated, I got her (R4) cleaned up and dressed and we were transferring from the bed to the chair and her legs were giving out so I lowered her to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the physician of a new pressure wound, failed to initiate a treatment upon identification of a new pressure area, and failed to complete weekly assessments after identification of a new pressure wound. This failure resulted in R31's pressure wound deteriorating to a stage 3 before a wound treatment was initiated. The findings include: R31's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R31's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed her diagnoses to include non-traumatic brain dysfunction, coronary artery disease, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and dementia. The same assessment showed R31 has severe cognitive deficits. R31's care plan initiated 7/20/23 showed, [R31] is at risk for impaired skin integrity due to cognitive deficits, impaired mobility, incontinence, PVD (peripheral vascular disease) and advanced age Daily skin inspection; report any charges in skin or signs of possible skin breakdown or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a home health referral upon a residents (R1) discharge from the facility. This applies to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge in the sample of 5.The findings include:R1's electronic face sheet printed on 4/21/26 showed R1 has diagnoses including but not limited to fibromyalgia, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, presence of aortocoronary bypass graft, chronic pain syndrome, muscle wasting & weakness, major depressive disorder, Bell's Palsy, generalized anxiety disorder, and osteoarthritis.R1's care plan dated 6/9/25 showed, Return to community referral. (R1) does not plan to make the community a long term home (R1) will be assisted with the plan to stay in the community until discharge is practical-associates will support (R1's) plan to stay short term, assist with referrals, as needed, to meet goals for discharge.R1's facility discharge assessment dated [DATE] showed, planned discharge, discharge status: home under care of organized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received an ordered low sodium diet. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for special dietary needs in the sample of 5. The findings include:R1's Face Sheet showed diagnoses to include heart bypass surgery, myocardial infarction (heart attack), and hypertension (high blood pressure).R1's 5/28/25 Brief Interview for Mental Status score showed she was cognitively intact with a score of 15 out of 15.On 4/21/26 at 9:35 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated the facility had changed ownership after R1 was discharged from the facility (R1 was discharged to home with family on 6/9/25). V1 stated records prior to 10/1/25 went with the previous owners and they were not returning calls. R1's entire medical was requested. On 4/21/26 at 9:50 AM, V1 stated she may have a staff member that has access to the previous electronic health record.On 4/21/26 at 11:45 AM, V1 provided a paper copy of R1's Electronic Medical Record. R1's hospital Discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records of controlled medications for seven (R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12) of ten residents reviewed for medication management in the sample of 12.The findings include:1.R9's Order Summary Report dated March 12, 2026, shows an order for hydrocodone-acetaminophen (Norco) 5-325 mg give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain started January 8, 2026.A narcotic count was performed with V4 Licensed Practical Nurse on March 12, 2026, at 11:08 AM. R9's Norco punch card had 14 pills left in it. R9's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form shows the last dose was administered on March 7, 2026, and there were 15 pills left. (Meaning one pill was missing and not signed out). V4 said she performed a narcotic count with the previous nurse. V4 said one nurse has the sheet and the other nurse has the drawer with the narcotics. V4 said she doesn't know why there is a discrepancy. V4 said she does not remember giving R9 a Norco. On March 12, 2026, at 2:53 PM, V1 Administrator said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher temperature was at an appropriate temperature to sanitize dishes and silverware and failed to maintain the garbage disposal system. These failures have the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility.The findings include:The Resident Census and Condition Report provided by the facility on 3/4/26 showed 88 residents residing in the building.On 3/3/26 at 9:06AM, The dishwasher was draining large amounts of water onto the dish room floor. The water had small amounts of food and wrappers located in it. The dishwasher was started and showed a wash cycle temperature of 144 degrees Fahrenheit. The front of the machine showed a reference wash cycle temperature of 150 degrees Fahrenheit. There was a strong odor of rotting food within the dish room. Surveyor observed the sink with the garbage disposal was full of orange/brown water with food floating in it.On 3/3/26 at 9:19AM, V5 (Dietary Manager) stated, There is a pipe on the back of the dishwasher that falls off every day at a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 6 residents (R19, R25, R65, R85, R94, R106) were treated with dignity during mealtimes, and failed to provide assistance with facial hair grooming for 1 resident (R31). These failures apply to 7 of 7 residents reviewed for dignity in the sample of 23.The findings include: 1. On 3/4/26 at 11:34AM, R25, R94, and R106 were seated at the lunch table together. R94 received her lunch tray and began eating her food. At 11:48AM, surveyor observed R94 stop eating. R94 stated, I'm trying to wait so we can all eat together but my food is getting cold. At 11:55AM, R25 stated, We always have to wait a long time after (R94) gets served. I think it's ridiculous. We should all be eating at the same time & she shouldn't have to eat slower because we are waiting. At 11:57AM, V5 (Dietary Supervisor) brought R25 and R106's meal tray. R25 stated that wasn't what she ordered and V5 stated her ticket was lost so they brought her the main meal. V5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications at ordered times. There were 29 opportunities with 9 errors resulting in a 31% medication error rate. This applies to 4 of 6 (R31, R53, R80, R81) residents reviewed for medication pass.The findings include:1. R31's March 2026 physician's orders showed R31 receives meropenem 1000 milligrams (mg) intravenously every 12 hours for bacterial infection and acetaminophen 650mg at 8AM and 8PM. On 3/3/26 at 03/03/2026 9:30AM, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) administered R31's acetaminophen 650mg (1 hour and 30 minutes past the scheduled administration time).On 3/3/26 at 9:38AM, R31 stated she doesn't think she received her meropenem this morning. V16 stated, I'm an LPN so I can't give it. She's supposed to get it at 6AM. I just can't give it so I have to get time to go get the RN (Registered Nurse) on the other side of the building. V16 then notified the Nurse Practitioner of R31's late medication and informed administration that she needed an RN to administer R31's intravenous meropenem (3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare pureed foods to the desired consistency. This applies to 8 of 8 residents (R2, R35, R46, R48, R53, R87, R90, R91) reviewed for pureed foods in the sample of 23.The findings include: On 3/3/26, the facility provided a list of residents receiving a pureed diet. R2, R35, R46, R48, R53, R87, R90 and R91 were all residents listed as receiving a pureed diet. On 3/3/26 at 11:10AM, V14 (Cook) prepared the pureed fried steak. V14 poured the meat with a small amount of liquid from the bottom of the cooking pan into the blender. V14 blended the meat to a ground consistency and then poured it into a pan. V14 then prepared the pureed corn by pouring the corn into the blender, blended to a ground consistency, and poured it into a separate pan. Upon completion of blending each item, V14 tasted the items and stated they were both a pureed consistency which should be a smooth consistency and not a paste-like consistency.On 3/3/26 at 12:07PM, R35 stated his food was not pureed. He stated the meat wasn't pureed all the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide HS (bedtime) snacks for 6 of 6 residents (R4, R8, R30, R34, R56, R80) reviewed for HS snacks in the sample of 23.The findings include:On 3/4/26 at 10:07AM, a Resident Council meeting was held with R4, R8, R30, R34, R56, and R80. All residents stated the kitchen does not send snacks every day for them. We don't get offered snacks every day. The only time we get snacks is when we request it but we thought they were supposed to come around and offer it. All residents state they would like to at least be offered a snack because it is a long time to wait from dinner time to breakfast the next day.R4, R8, R30, R34, and R80's most recent facility assessments showed no cognitive impairment. R56's most recent facility assessment showed mild cognitive impairment.The resident council minutes for January 2026 showed, Are you offered a bed time snack? No. Residents were encouraged to go ask for snacks when they stated they do not receive a bed time snack.On 3/5/26 at 11:11AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, Snacks are passed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident had a wheelchair that fit and maintained body alignment and positioning needs for 1 of 1 residents (R60) reviewed for accommodation of needs in the sample of 23.The findings include:On 3/4/26 at 9:03 AM, R60 was sitting in her wheelchair in the common area with her left leg twisted inward. The resident's knees were bent, and the back of her knees were about 1 foot away from the seat of the wheelchair. R60 complained of pain to her left leg and did not look comfortable. V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA) was asked to observe R60 and V13 stated R60 did not look comfortable in the wheelchair.On 3/4/26 at 9:12 AM, V12 (Restorative Nurse) went with the surveyor to observe R60 in her chair. V12 stated R60's positioning in the wheelchair wasn't good and confirmed that the wheelchair did not appear to fit R60 as it should.On 3/4/26 at 9:15 AM, V6 (Director of Physical Therapy) observed R60 in her wheelchair and stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the elasticated tubular support bandages were in place for 1 of 1 residents (R60) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 23.The findings include:On 3/3/26 at 2:35 PM, R60 was sitting in her wheelchair with her feet on the floor and grip socks on. R60 did not have any elasticated tubular support bandages (leg wraps) on her lower legs. V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA) was asked to check and see if R60 had any leg wraps in place and she confirmed R60 did not have any and she was not aware of the resident having any.On 3/3/26 at 2:41PM, V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN) stated the elasticated tubular support bandages should be done as ordered. V7 stated she thought they were put on by the night nurse. V7 looked in her computer and stated the leg wraps can be put on by either the day or night shift nurse. On 3/4/26 at 9:03 AM, R60 was sitting in her wheelchair in the common area and did not have leg wraps in place. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was positioned safely to prevent a fall for 1 (R4) of 4 residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 23.The findings include:R4s admission record shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure and a history of falling. The 12/16/25 quarterly resident assessment and care screening documents R4 to be cognitively intact. The same record shows R4 requires partial/moderate assist with rolling right to left. The helper lifts, holds or supports trunk and limb during the movement.R4s 11/30/25 care plan documents her to be a high risk for falls related to functional deficits.The facility's 2/5/26 incident report of a witnessed fall documents R4 fell out of bed during repositioning. She was lowered to the floor gently by the aide. On 3/04/2026 at 12:34 PM, R4 said she had rolled out of her bed about a month ago. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was repositioning her in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an indwelling catheter drainage bag was maintained below the level of the bladder for 1 of 3 residents (R31) reviewed for indwelling catheters in the sample of 23. The findings include:On 3/4/26 at 8:35 AM, V19 and V20 (Certified Nursing Assistants - CNAs) had the total lift in R31's room. They said they just got R31 up and were getting her ready for her dentist appointment. V20 left the room briefly and re-entered. R31 was seated in her electric wheelchair. V19 lifted R31's catheter drainage bag in the air to place it in the privacy bag. R31's catheter drainage bag was at the level of R31's shoulders (above the level of her bladder) and yellow urine was flowing back toward R31 in the tubing.On 3/4/26 at 12:34 PM, V21, V22, and V23 (CNAs) entered R31's room to transfer her to bed with the total lift. V22 and V23 applied R31's total lift sling to the mechanical lift. V22 said someone will need to hold R31's catheter. V22 removed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label open tube feeding, ensure a feeding tube dressing was intact, and check placement of a feeding tube prior to using the tube for 1 of 1 residents (R3) reviewed for enteral feeding in the sample of 23. The findings include:On 3/3/26 at 10:07 AM, there was an open bottle of tube feeding sitting on R3's dresser. There was 300 milliliters (ml) left in the bottle. The tube feeding was not labeled when it was opened.On 3/3/26 at 1:19 PM, R3 was laying in bed with his abdomen exposed. R3's feeding tube was slightly pulled out and there wasn't a dressing on his abdomen around the feeding tube. The dressing was twisted with bloody drainage and was hanging down on his tubing. V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN) was leaving his room and stated she was just cleaning up his room. At 1:24 PM, V7 was asked if she was returning to R3's room and she stated she had already given R3 his bolus of tube feeding at 11:00 AM and his medications had been given so she was done in his room. V7 stated his dressing around his feeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow professional standards when starting an intravenous (IV) antibiotic for 1 of 1 resident (R38) in the sample of 23. The findings include:On 3/3/26 at 9:35 AM, V18 (Registered Nurse - RN) prepared to administer IV antibiotics to R38's PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line. V18 flushed R38's PICC line with 10 milliliters (ml) of Normal Saline (NS), clamped the PICC line and left the syringe attached to R38. V18 checked the IV antibiotic and stated, This is ampicillin 500 milligrams (mg) and we will run the 100 ml over 60 minutes. V18 opened the IV tubing and spiked the antibiotic. V18 primed the IV tubing with the antibiotic, clamped the white C-clamp and roller clamp. V18 removed the flush syringe from R39's PICC line, cleansed the site with an alcohol swab and attached the IV tubing. V18 opened the clamp on the PICC line site and the roller clamp on the IV tubing. The white C-clamp was still closed on the IV tubing. V18 said the next step was to put the tubing in the pump and set the rate.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have respiratory masks covered and stored in a manner to prevent any cross contamination for 3 of 3 residents (R3, R29, and R107) reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 23.The findings include:1. On 3/3/26 at 10:07 AM R3 had a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) machine with a face mask sitting face down uncovered on the bedside table. The mask was dirty with white substances on the inside of the mask and some tan flakes. R3's nebulizer mask was uncovered on the bedside table, and the inside of the mask was dirty.On 3/3/26 at 2:25 PM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing - ADON/Infection Control Preventionist) stated respiratory masks are kept in little black bags next to the machines. This is done for sanitary reasons/infection control.R3's Face Sheet dated 3/4/26 showed diagnoses including hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, asthma, critical illness myopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, aphasia, spastic hemiplegia, gastroesophageal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of a residents (R90) expired insulin pen, failed to store narcotics in a manner to prevent medication diversion for a resident (R80). These failures apply to 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication storage.The findings include:On [DATE] at 1:34PM, surveyor reviewed medication cart belonging to V17's (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) assignment. R90's insulin aspart pen had an open date of 12/15 and an expiration date of 1/15. V17 stated, We try to keep an eye on the insulin pens to check expiration dates. (R90) hardly ever uses his sliding scale insulin so that's probably why we didn't notice it but it should have been discarded if it's been open for more than 28 days. V17 disposed of R90's insulin aspart pen and obtained a brand new one out of the medication room and stated, I don't know why we didn't replace it if there's a new one here that we should be using. R90's February and March medication administration records were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility staff failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions - EBP when providing care for a resident with a feeding tube for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions in the sample of 23.The findings include:On 3/3/26 at 1:24 PM, R3 was laying in bed with his dressing around his feeding tube twisted with bloody drainage. The dressing was down on the tubing and not secure to his abdomen. At 1:28 PM, V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN) and V9 (Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA) went into R3's room with gloves on but no gowns on. They repositioned R3 in the bed. V7 removed the old dressing from around R3's feeding tube, did site care, and placed a new dressing. V7 and V9 repositioned R3 in bed. V9 stated R3 was incontinent of bowel movement and said she needed to go and get help. When V9 returned to the room she had V8 (CNA) with her. V7, V8, and V9 were asked about EBP. V7 stated she did not know if R3 was on EBP. V8 stated that a gown, gloves, and face mask is to be worn with care of the feeding tube and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to honor resident preferences regarding menu items. This failure has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The findings include:The facility's resident roster provided on 12/6/25 showed 77 residents reside in the facility.On 12/6/25 at 8:39 AM, V3 [NAME] stated bacon used to be provided for the residents prior to the current owners acquiring the building. (New corporation took ownership on 10/1/25.) V3 said, We used to make bacon all the time.I had four residents ask for it this morning.On 12/6/25 at 8:45 AM and 8:47 AM respectively, a walk-through of the facility's walk-in freezer and walk-in refrigerator showed no bacon.On 12/6/25 at 8:53 AM, V2 Dietary Aide stated We do have residents asking for bacon all the time, but we were told the company won't allow it. [V4] is the dietary manager, and he called the company, and they said no bacon. V2 stated R2, R3, R4, and R5 routinely ask for bacon.On 12/6/25 at 1:16 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner for 3 of 3 residents (R1-R3) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 5. The findings include: On 7/21/25 at 9:02 AM, R1 stated, I had a shower last Tuesday (7/15/25). The aide that was with me was on her cell phone the whole time we were in the shower. I don't remember her name. She answered her phone and talked through her earphones. I felt like she wasn't really paying attention to me. I wasn't important. R1's shower records showed R1 did receive a shower on 7/15/25 by V8 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). On 7/21/25 at 8:35 AM, R2 stated during her shower on 7/12/25, the CNA that gave her a shower was on her phone. She had her earphones in and her cell phone rang. She answered it (while she was in the shower with R2) and started talking. R2 stated, Why was my bath not more important than her phone call? She has a job because I need help. R2 stated she was unable to remember the name of the CNA that showered her on 7/12/25. R2's shower records showed R2 did receive a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide showers to a resident that required staff assistance to shower for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) in the sample of 5. The findings include: R1's current care plan showed R1 required staff assistance and supervision for showering or bathing. On 7/21/25 at 9:02 AM, R1 stated he's supposed to get at least two showers per week but sometimes he only got one shower per week or none at all. R1's shower records dated 5/1/25-7/21/25 were reviewed. R1's records showed R1 received a shower on 6/27/25. The records showed R1 was not offered and did not receive another shower until 7/11/25 (13 days later). On 7/21/25 at 12:21 PM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated staff are to offer and/or provide a shower or bath to residents twice a week. V2 stated the facility did not have a policy on how often a resident is to be showered/bathed.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow up and obtain an ophthalmology appointment for a resident with vision loss for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for necessary care and services in the sample of 5. The findings include: R1's current care plan showed R1 was visually impaired which required him to wear eyeglasses. A physician order for R1, dated 12/17/24, showed, Ophthalmology consult and treatment as indicated. On 7/21/25 at 9:02 AM, R1 was seated in bed. R1 wore eyeglasses. R1 stated he felt like his vision had gotten worse recently even with wearing his glasses. R1 stated he had an appointment to see an eye doctor but the appointment was canceled. R1 stated he didn't know why the appointment had been canceled. R1 stated he had not been seen by an ophthalmologist and/or had his vision tested in over a year. The facility's resident outside appointment records dated 4/1/25-7/21/25 was reviewed. The records showed R1 had an appointment for an ophthalmology exam on 5/1/25 but the appointment had been canceled due to the ophthalmology office not accepting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a surgical incision was cleansed per physician's order for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for physician's orders in the sample of 5. The findings include: R1's medical record showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include fibromyalgia, atherosclerotic heart disease, surgical aftercare following cardiac surgery, myocardial infarction, presence of aortocoronary bypass graft, asthma with acute exacerbation, chronic pain syndrome, muscle wasting, muscle weakness, hypertension, major depressive disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, and hypokalemia. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she had no cognitive impairments and required partial to moderate assist with most cares. R1's acute care hospital discharge packet dated 5/27/25 showed . Wound Care Orders . Monitor your wounds for signs and symptoms of infection, including redness, swelling, drainage, and odor. If you notice these symptoms call your surgeon's office.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician for one of six residents (R1) reviewed for medications in the sample of six. The findings include: R1's Face Sheet dated June 9, 2025 shows she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including fibromyalgia, heart disease, myocardial infarction, presence of aortocoronary bypass graft, asthma, chronic pain syndrome, muscle weakness, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, mixed hyperlipidemia osteoarthritis, and generalized anxiety disorder. R1's Medication Record dated June 2025 shows levothyroxine ordered to be administered at 7:00 AM and an order for acetaminophen 500 mg (milligrams) one tablet by mouth four times per day. On June 9, 2025 at 9:18 AM, during the morning medication pass, V5 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered R1's levothyroxine that was ordered to be given at 7:00 AM and administered acetaminophen 500 mg two tablets instead of one tablet as ordered. On June 9, 2025 at 11:15 AM, R1 said that she has to take her levothyroxine at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound/skin treatments and failed to perform weekly skin checks. This applies to 4 of 5 (R4, R3, R1, R5) residents reviewed for improper nursing care in the sample of 6. The findings include: 1.) R4's Face Sheet showed she had skin infections, morbid obesity, and congestive heart failure. On 5/27/25 at 12:50 PM, R4 said she may only receive her leg wound care one to two times per week, depending on the staff that are working. R4's 5/26/25 Wound Evaluation and Management Summary report showed she had a non-pressure wound to the left thigh measuring 0.3 centimeters (cm) by 0.7 cm by 0.2 cm deep. The wound report showed a second non-pressure wound to her right knee measuring 4.4 cm by 5.3 cm by 0.7 cm deep. The wound report showed another non-pressure wound to R4's left thigh measuring 0.5 cm by 1.9 cm by 0.1 cm. R4's April 2025 Treatment Record (Treatment Administration Record, TAR) showed weekly skin checks were not documented as being done on 4/6/25, 4/20/25, and 4/27/25. R4's April 2025 TAR showed three separate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and report the diversion of a resident's controlled substance. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for controlled substances in the sample of 6. The findings include: R5's May 2025 Medication Record (Medication Administration Record, MAR) showed an order for lorazepam (anxiety treatment medication) liquid 2 milligrams per milliliter (ml). The MAR showed 0.25 milliliters should be given under the tongue every four hours as needed for restlessness. R5's Lorazepam Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form (Count Sheet) showed the pharmacy delivered 30.0 ml of lorazepam on 3/28/25. The count sheet showed from 3/28/25 to 5/16/25, 8 doses of lorazepam at 0.25 ml were given. The count sheet showed, on 5/17/25 at 6:00 AM, the count was correct(ed) from 28.0 mls available to 24.0 mls available (a discrepancy of 4 mls). The count showed two nurses signed off on the correction. The count sheet showed, as of 5/27/27, no lorazepam had been dispensed since the correction on 5/17/25. On 5/27/25 at 11:19 AM, V3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatments for a pressure wound. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for wound care in the sample of 6. The findings include: R2's Face Sheet showed she had a stage four pressure injury above her buttocks. On 5/29/25 at 9:25 AM, V5 Wound Care Nurse provided R2's ordered wound care. The wound appeared to be the size as described in R2's 5/26/25 wound note. The wound bed was red and not actively draining. V5 provided wound care and applied a dressing. R2's April 2025 Treatment Record (Treatment Administration Record, TAR) showed an order for twice-daily wound care treatments for her stage four pressure injury. The TAR showed the evening treatments on 4/29/25 and 4/30/25 were not documented as being done. R2's May 2025 TAR showed her pressure injury wound care order carried over from April 2025. The TAR showed her evening 5/10/25 wound care treatment was not documented as being done. On 5/27/25 at 2:20 PM, V5 Wound Care Nurse stated the purpose of wound care treatments was to promote healing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate disposition of controlled substances, failed to have procedures in place to accurately measure controlled substances, and failed to maintain an accurate log of controlled substances. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for controlled substances in the sample of 6. The findings include: 1. R5's May 2025 Medication Record (Medication Administration Record, MAR) showed an order for lorazepam (anxiety treatment medication) liquid 2 milligrams per milliliter (ml). The MAR showed 0.25 milliliters should be given under the tongue every four hours as needed for restlessness. R5's Lorazepam Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form (Count Sheet) showed the pharmacy delivered 30.0 ml of lorazepam on 3/28/25. The count sheet showed from 3/28/25 to 5/16/25, 8 doses of lorazepam at 0.25 ml were given. The count sheet showed, on 5/17/25 at 6:00 AM, the count was correct(ed) from 28.0 mls available to 24.0 mls available (a discrepancy of 4 mls). The count showed two nurses signed off on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pureed Swiss steak was a smooth, uniform texture that does not require chewing for 4 of 4 residents (R2, R35, R52, R78) reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 18. The findings include: The facility provided list of residents on a pureed diet shows that R2, R35, R52, and R78 receive a pureed diet. On 12/9/24 at 11:28 AM, V11 (Cook) began pureeing the Swiss steak for lunch. V11 said the texture she is looking for with the pureed products is a consistency similar to mashed potatoes. V11 ran the food processor for a few short minutes before using a spatula to put the pureed Swiss steak into a steam table pan. The pureed Swiss steak appeared slightly chunky while V11 was transferring the product from the food processor into the steam table pan. V11 did not taste test the pureed Swiss steak when finished. On 12/9/24 at 1:12 PM, facility provided test tray of pureed Swiss steak, pureed broccoli, pureed mashed potatoes, and pureed bread pudding was reviewed. The pureed Swiss steak was gritty with small…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a spatula and food processor components were washed and sanitized in a manner to prevent cross-contamination for 4 of 4 residents (R2, R35, R52, R78) reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 18. The findings include: The facility provided list of residents on a puree diet shows that R2, R35, R52, and R78 receive a pureed diet. On 12/9/24 at 11:28 AM, the facility had approximately six food processor pitchers, two food processor lids, and three food processor blades for use at the puree station. On 12/9/24 at 11:28 AM, V11 (Cook) started to puree the Swiss steak for lunch. When V11 finished the Swiss steak, V11 placed the food processor pitcher with the blade and lid into the sink adjacent the puree prep station. V11 ran hot water into the pitcher and grabbed the spatula and ran it underneath the running hot water. V11 then grabbed a new food processor pitcher, blade, and lid and started to puree the mashed potatoes for lunch. When finished with the mashed potatoes, V11 used the spatula that was run…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified manner for 1 of 18 residents (R9) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 18. The findings include: R9's Face Sheet shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including parkinsons, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, contusion of left ankle, and generalized anxiety disorder. R9's Care Plan with an admission date of May 28, 2021 shows R9 has emotional and spiritual distress due to hopelessness and lack of family support. R9's Care Plan dated February 9, 2022 shows to approach resident warmly and positively and in a calm manner, calmly talk with resident and offer reassurance prior to initiating cares. On December 9, 2024 at 10:14 AM, R9 went into her room and was asking to go into her bed. R9 was moaning and saying Oh my God. R9's moans were audible from across the hall. At 10:44 AM, V8 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) walked into R9's room and stood at the foot of R9's bed. V8 said,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to safely transfer a resident by using a gait belt for 1 of 18 residents (R36) reviewed for safety in the sample of 18. The findings include: R36's Care Plan shows, Gait belt with all transfers .Transfers with assist of 1 person. On 12/9/24 at 1:01 PM, V18, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) brought R36 to his room. V18 positioned R36's wheelchair next to his bed. V18 assisted R36 to a standing position by lifting under his arm. V18 instructed R36 to turn while she guided his hips with her hands to the appropriate position to get into bed. V18 did not apply a gait belt on R36 during the transfer from his wheelchair to the bed. On 12/10/24 at 1:53 PM, V19 (CNA) said that R36 is a one person assist for transfers and staff should use a gait belt and his walker for the transfer. On 12/10/24 at 1:53 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said that gait belts should be use with all transfers for the resident's safety if they start to fall. The facility's Restorative Nursing-Transfer Program Policy revised on 12/2017 shows, Use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. There were 37 opportunities with 4 errors resulting in a 10.81 % error rate. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) observed in the medication pass. The findings include: 1. R2's December Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that R2 had an order for Diltiazem 30 milligrams (mg) to be given at 8:00 AM for hypertension. There was no hold parameters on the order. On 12/10/24 at 8:30 AM, V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered R2's morning medications. R2's blood pressure was 160/75 and her pulse was 58. V10 did not administer R2's Diltiazem. V10 stated that she was going to hold R2's Diltiazem because her pulse was less than 70. R2's clinical records were reviewed on 12/11/24 and did not contain any documentation that the physician was notified that R2's Diltiazem was held on 12/10/24. 2. R2's December MAR shows an order for Timolol Maleate 0.5 % eye drops-one drop to left eye every morning at 8:00 AM due to changes in retinal vascular appearance. On 12/10/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received the correct insulins as ordered by an endocrinologist for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for significant medication errors in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 12/9/24 at 9:25 AM, R2 said that the facility did not transcribe her insulin orders right from her endocrinology appointment a few months ago. R2's After Visit Summary (AVS) from her endocrinologist dated 9/24/24 shows, The following issue was addressed: Type 1 diabetes mellitus with polyneuropathy .Please change basaglar (long-acting insulin) dose to 10 units in the morning and 16 units in the evening. Adjust the meal time novolog (short-acting insulin) dose to 10 units with meals and continue the sliding scale R2's September MAR shows that on 9/24/24 an order was placed for: Insulin Glargine (long-acting insulin) 20 units in the AM and Insulin Lispro (short-acting insulin) 16 units in the evening. R2's MAR shows that she received the insulins until it was discontinued on 9/30/24. R2's September MAR shows that on 9/24/24 an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care to a resident with dementia in a manner to prevent escalating agitation for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for dementia in the sample of 6. The finding include: On 9/11/24 at 10:52 AM, V22 (R4's POA - Power of Attorney for Healthcare) said there was an incident on July 13, 2024 with R4 and four facility staff members in the bathroom. V22 said she hates to use the word abuse, but feels that the facility staff could use more dementia care training. V22 said she was not present during the incident, but was notified by her sister (V21) that was present. V22 said she is an administrator at another facility and CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), V22 said she is well-versed in Dementia Care and didn't feel like sending four people in to assist with care was appropriate. V22 said R4 is slow to respond, needs time to understand the instructions provided, and gets agitated when too many people are giving instructions and getting loud…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess, treat, and document areas of skin damage to a resident's inner thigh and left knee. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for skin alterations in a sample of 4. The findings include: On 7/31/24 at 10:30 AM V4 and V5 (Certified Nursing Assistants/CNAs) assisted R1 with perineal care. R1 was very particular with care and resistant to anything suggested to her. V5 stated, (R1) usually allows us to change her one time per shift. R1 stated, That is my choice. Because of this, V4 and V5 used a liner inside of the diaper. R1 stated she was last changed on night shift and her brief and liner were saturated with urine. One bed pad under her was also wet with urine. R1 stated that she does not like to be woken up at 2:00 AM to be changed and she would rather be left alone. R1's wet brief was removed and her skin was washed with skin cleanser and water. There was a foam patch on her coccyx that was swollen with urine, one on her left anterior thigh that also appeared saturated and another on her outer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication choice was followed for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medications in the sample of 3. The findings include: On 5/21/24 at 9:19 AM, R1 was asleep in her bed. On 5/21/24 at 10:30 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said R1's current Physicians Orders (POS) contain orders for melatonin 3 mg (milligrams) every evening scheduled and also melatonin 3 mg PRN (as needed). V2 (after reviewing the printed POS in R1's chart) said this POS was printed on 5/14/24 and the family wrote on it not to give R1 the PRN dose of medication unless requested by the family. V2 said she was not sure what nurse printed or went over the medications with R1's family or if the Nurse Practitioner (NP) or Doctor was notified. V2 said currently R1 is still getting scheduled melatonin 3 MG daily. On 5/21/24 at 11:03 AM, V6 (R1's Power of Attorney/Emergency Contact) said on 5/14/24 she went over R1's medication list (POS) with the nurse on duty and wrote on the list to not give the scheduled melatonin and to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner during care. This applies to 3 of 3 resident (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for dignity in a sample of 3 residents. The findings include: R1's Face Sheet shows her diagnoses includes, Vascular Dementia with behavioral disturbances, anxiety, depression, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and difficulty walking. R2's Face Sheet shows her diagnoses includes, anxiety disorder, depression, chronic pain, and weakness. She is assessed to have a moderate fall risk according to her 3/19/24 [NAME] Fall Risk Screening. R2 is cognitively intact according to her Brief Interview of Mental Status. R3's Face Sheet shows her diagnoses includes, arthritis, cellulitis of the lower extremeties, and muscle weakness. She is assessed to have a moderate fall risk according to her 12/5/23 [NAME] Fall Risk Screening. R3 is cognitively intact according to her Brief Interview of Mental Status. On 4/23/24 at 8:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) said, she investigated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat 3 residents (R14, R60, R79) with dignity during mealtime. This applies to 3 of 3 resident's reviewed for dignity outside of the sample. The findings include: On 2/6/24 at 11:33AM, V24 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was sitting at a lunch table with R14, R60, and R79. V24 was eating pizza and drinking her own personal drink. R14 stated, Oh, that pizza looks really good. I wish I could have some. All residents at the table had not been served their lunch meal. V24 continued eating her pizza until she identified the surveyor in the dining room. V24 then left the dining room with her pizza and drink and did not return until after the 3 residents had been served their noon meal. On 2/8/24 at 12:16PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, Staff should not eat at the table with resident's due to this being a dignity concern. This is completely unacceptable, especially because the residents did not receive the same meal and hadn't received their food. Staff are never allowed to eat at the table when assisting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prepare a resident for discharge resulting in the resident exhausting his medication supply prior to his appointment with his primary physician. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R80) reviewed for discharge in the sample of 21. The findings include: R80's Face Sheet showed an admission date of 12/23/23 and a discharge date of 1/23/24. The Face Sheet showed diagnoses to include respiratory failure, diabetes type 2, heart failure, and cellulitis (skin infection.) R80's Nurse's Note from 1/23/24 at 7:43 PM showed R80 was sent home with his mother and his remaining medications. (Note was authored by V20 Registered Nurse.) On 2/06/24 01:25 PM, V34 R80's Power of Attorney/Mother stated R80 was released at 3:00 PM on Tuesday and he was not given any medications for Wednesday. V34 stated R80 and herself were not aware R80 would not have enough medications to get R80 through until his doctor's appointment. V34 stated, R80 could not be seen by his primary doctor until the following Monday. V34 stated, R80 was able to get his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform a restorative assessment following a change in condition for a resident, failed to ensure a call light was available for a resident with a history of falls and failed to update a resident's care plan with updated fall interventions. These failures apply to 1 of 7 residents (R16) reviewed for falls in the sample of 21. The findings include: R16's electronic face sheet printed on 2/8/24 showed R16 has diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, diabetes, depression, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. R16's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R16 has severe cognitive impairment, utilizes a walker, requires set-up assistance for transfers and ambulation, and has a history of falls. R16's care plan dated 2/11/23 showed, Impaired mobility due to weakness .wheelchair for mobility leave foot pedals off as she likes to move her chair with her feet (discontinued: not using wheelchair), independent with walker. R16's care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident had care orders for an indwelling catheter for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheters in the sample of 21. The findings include: R66's face sheet shows he was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 1/28/24 admission assessment documents R66 to have an indwelling catheter. On 2/6/24, R66 was observed to be lying in bed with an indwelling catheter drainage bag hanging on the edge of the bed. On 2/6/24 at 11:17 AM, R66 said he has had the catheter for a while but does not know why. He denied any issues or concerns related to the catheter. R66's February 2024 physician order sheet was reviewed and has no order for the indwelling catheter, any care orders, the size of the catheter or when it would be changed. On 2/8/24 at 8:52 AM, V12 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) said when a resident returns from the hospital with a catheter, we get orders when getting report from the hospital. We would get when it was inserted and why…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify a resident (R57) was utilizing a BiPap (bi-level positive airway pressure) machine and failed to store a resident's BiPap mask in a sanitary manner for 1 resident (R57). The findings include: R57's electronic face sheet printed on 2/8/24 showed R57 has diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction, obstructive sleep apnea, dyspnea, and chronic kidney disease. R57's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R57 has no cognitive impairment and uses a non-invasive mechanical ventilator. R57's care plan dated 1/26/23 showed, (R57) has the potential for impaired gas exchange related to sleep apnea and requires continuous use of oxygen and/or CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure). 11/9/23 care plan reviewed continues to use CPAP when sleeping. No signs or symptoms of respiratory distress noted. Keep same plan of care. Change tubing and bubblers per protocol or as ordered. R57's physician's orders dated 1/26/23 showed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed label insulin pens with an open date and discard date. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R70) reviewed for medications in the sample of 21 and one resident (R53) outside of the sample. The findings include: 1. R70's Physician Orders showed an active order since at least 1/17/24 for 11 units of long-acting insulin to be given daily. On 2/07/24 at 4:12 PM, V22 Licensed Practical Nursing (LPN) opened the medication cart for R70's unit. R70's insulin pen was not labeled with the date it was opened or discarded. The insulin pen showed there were approximately 80 units of insulin remaining. V22 stated the pen had been opened and used. On 2/07/24 at 4:27 PM, V2 Director of Nursing, stated she had seen R70's insulin pen and it was not labeled with an open date or discard date. V2 said the insulin pen had to be discarded because it was not known when it had been opened. V2 stated insulin pens need to be discarded within 28 days of being opened per manufacturer instructions. The facility's Procedure: Insulin Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) into a COVID-19 positive resident's room. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R8) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 21 and 1 resident (R4) outside of the sample. The findings include: 1) R4's electronic face sheet printed on 2/8/24 showed R4 has a current diagnosis of COVID-19. On 2/8/24 at 9:15AM, V29 (Dietary Aide) was collecting R4's room tray. V29 entered R4's room with only a surgical mask and no additional PPE on. V29 exited R4's room with her meal tray unwrapped and set it on the community cart. V29 stated, I didn't know she was on isolation. I am supposed to wrap the tray in a plastic bag. I'm not sure why I need to do that though. I should have been wearing more PPE I guess but I don't know what all I'm supposed to wear. 2) R8's electronic face sheet printed on 2/8/24 showed R8 has a current diagnosis of COVID-19. R8's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R8 has no cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident refusing the COVID-19 vaccine did not receive it for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 10. The findings include: R6's face sheet showed a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R6's diagnosis included arthritis, hypertension, dysphagia, neuropathy, atrial fibrillation, and a history of falling. On 11/7/23 at 10:15 AM, V7 R6's power of attorney (POA) said R6 received a COVID booster after a refusal was signed. V7 said V2 Director of Nursing (DON) called her on 11/2 or 11/3/23 to notify her. I was so mad I couldn't remember her name (DON). At 10:33 AM, V2 said she was notified by V3 Quality Assurance Director that R6 received the vaccine and should not have. It was my first day here and I was asked to notify the POA. V2 said V3 was notified by the pharmacy of the error. R6 was the only resident identified as receiving the vaccine who had refused. On 11/7/23 at 11:31 AM, R6 was seated in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an employee was immediately removed from resident care pending the investigation of an allegation of missing medications for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for missing medications. The findings include: On 11/1/23 at 9:02 AM, V3 Interim Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), said on 10/28/23 at around 8:30 PM, V4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), could not find two Fentanyl (narcotic/opioid pain medication) patches. V3 said V4 called her that evening, but her phone was out of range, and she did not hear about the incident until the next morning (10/29/23). V3 said she went to the facility, took V4's statement and suspended V4 pending the investigation. On 11/1/23 at 11:41 AM, V4 said she was working on 10/28/23 and prepared two Fentanyl patches for R1. V4 said she dated and initialed the patches, then was interrupted to assist with the pharmacy delivery. V4 said she thought she put the patches in the drawer in the medication cart, but when she returned, she could not find the patches. V4 said she looked everywhere for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a significant medication error. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of eight. The findings include: R2's face sheet shows she is a [AGE] year-old female with diagnosis including congestive heart failure, unspecified dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. R2's Incident Report dated 10/3/23 documents R2 was given another resident (R7's) methadone (opiate) 10 mg (milligrams) two tablets around 8:00 PM. V3 (LPN) was training V5 (RN) on medication administration. V3 handed a cup of pills to V5 and told her the name and the room number, but V3 told her the wrong room number. On 10/10/23 at 9:00 AM, R2 was observed in her room sitting in her wheelchair. She was alert to herself, but not oriented to time or place. When asked if she was in the hospital recently, she said no. R2 and R7's room were located next…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$125,824 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $15,015 — penalty dated 2025-09-02
  • $14,731 — penalty dated 2025-03-18
  • $15,004 — penalty dated 2024-12-11
  • $12,581 — penalty dated 2024-09-13
  • $12,248 — penalty dated 2024-08-01
  • $56,245 — penalty dated 2024-02-08
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-09 for 4 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-36.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense10% of expenses

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$374per resident / day
operating cost
$11,377per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$275per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145935. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next