No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Golden Good Shepherd Home

101 Prairie Mills Road, Golden, IL 62339 · Non profit - Other · 46 certified beds · (217) 696-4421 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (217) 696-4421 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
102 Prairie Mills Rd · (217) 696-4446 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
200 Pittsfield Rd · (217) 773-2144 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
400 E Wood St · (217) 593-6814 · Call to confirm hours
Park
102 E Park St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.5%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%6.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.7%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection12.1%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%54.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.4%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.4%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers14.6%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.5%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.3%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.6%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.2%13.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.752.021.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.612.221.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.7%CMS range 25.7–52.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.9–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened11.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.0–16.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.41
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
36.4%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 31.8 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-11-26)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-11-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of significant medication errors for one of one resident (R4) reviewed for significant medication errors in the sample of 28. These failures resulted in R4 ingesting a toxic amount of medication, experiencing increased lethargy, arrhythmia, sedation, and respiratory depression resulting in R4 requiring emergency department services and intravenous fluids. Findings include: R4's Progress Notes dated 10-16-24 at 5:25 PM and signed by V2 (Director of Nursing) documents, (R4) received the wrong medication this evening. Doctor and family notified. Vitals obtained and will be monitored closely through the night, (R4) is alert and orientated. No need to go the ER (Emergency Room) at this time. Continue to monitor. R4's Progress Notes dated 10-16-24 at 10:08 PM document, (R4's) O2 (Oxygen Saturation) noted to be 82 percent. At 9:30 PM on-call (physician) returned call and asked for updated O2 which was 72 percent on two liters…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure use of an effective sanitation solution and prevent spread of potential contamination to food and food preparation surfaces in the kitchen. This failure has the potential to affect all 35 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 11/24/24 at 11:45 AM V7 (Dietary Manager) and V8 (Dietary Cook) were in the kitchen preparing to serve lunch. At this time V8 removed a food thermometer from a storage cup containing other kitchen utensils. V8 then retrieved a folded kitchen cloth from the kitchen's storage closet and soaked the cloth in the kitchen's quaternary (bleach) sanitation bucket. V8 proceeded to wipe down the thermometer and began taking temperatures of hot food on the kitchen's steam table. V8 used the same wet cloth to clean the thermometer between each hot food item including roasted pork, sweet potatoes, mixed vegetables, and ground pork. After completing temperatures of hot items, V8 used the same cloth to clean the thermometer and checked the temperature of cold lettuce salad…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to cover a urinary catheter bag with a privacy bag for one of one resident (R21) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 28. Findings include: R21's current computerized medical record, documents R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side, Chronic kidney Disease, Retention of Urine, Other Specified Disorders of Bladder, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. R21's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 12/15, indicating (moderate cognitive impairment) and R21 has an indwelling urinary catheter. R21's Physicians Order dated 1/9/24 documents R21 has an (indwelling) catheter for diagnosis of Urinary Retention. On 11/24/24 at 9:46 AM, R21 was sitting in the recliner in his room. R21's urinary catheter bag was attached to R21's walker. There was no cover…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the call light was in reach for one resident (R2) out of 12 residents reviewed for call lights in the sample 28. Findings include: R2's Current Medical Record documents that R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Urinary Tract Infection, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Kidney Disease (stage 3), Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. R2's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documents R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 3 (severe cognitive impairment). On 11/24/24 at 10:10 AM R2 was lying in bed wearing oxygen. R2 was asked if she had her call light. R2 pulled down the covers and stated, I can't find it. V6/Licensed Practical Nurse came to R2's room and found the call light draped across the bedside table that was not within R2's reach. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's Physician Order and Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) code status was updated and accurate within the resident's care plan for one of 12 residents (R35) reviewed for Advanced Directives in the sample of 28. Findings include: R35's State Agency Uniform Practitioner for Lift-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form dated 11-9-24 and signed by (V11/R35's Family Representative) documents No CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation): DNR. R35's Physician's Order dated 11-10-24 and signed by V13 (Physician) documents, Code Status: DNR. R35's Current Advanced Directive Care Plan documents, I am not at or approaching end of life at this time. My wishes for advanced directives and end of life care will be honored. Full Code-full treatment. On [DATE] at 10:23 AM V10 (Social Service Director) stated, (R35) decided to change his advanced directives from a full code to a DNR on 11-9-24. I did not update (R35's)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement restorative range of motion programs for two of two residents (R4 and R6) reviewed for functional limitations in range of motion in the sample of 28. Findings include: 1. R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessments dated 10/6/24 and 7/7/24 document R4 is cognitively intact, has functional limitations in range of motion to one side of the upper and lower extremities, and does not receive therapy, range of motion, splint/brace assistance, or any restorative programs. R4's current Care Plan documents R4 has the diagnoses of Hemiplegia affecting the left nondominant side and Pain. This same Care Plan does not address R4's limitations in range of motion to the left upper and lower extremities. On 11/24/24 at 10:07 AM R4 was sitting in his wheelchair. R4's left hand was in a closed fist with his fingers facing inward towards his palm with no splint or assistive device. R4 was unable to open his left hand. R4 stated he does not receive any range of motion exercises and the staff do not put a roll or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure physician ordered daily weights were obtained for a resident with congestive heart failure for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for hydration in the sample of 28. Findings include: R1's current care plan, dated 11/8/24, documents R1 has diagnoses including but not limited to: Edema, Retention of Urine, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery, Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation, Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker, Volume Depletion, Dehydration (history), Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease. This care plan documents I have diagnosis of Hypertension with routine medication to treat. Intervention: Weigh me as ordered. This same care plan also documents I am at risk for dehydration. I receive a diuretic medication two times a day for edema. Intervention: Weigh me as ordered 5/02/24, Daily weight for CHF. R1's Current Physician Order sheet, dated 11/26/24, documents an order for Daily weight everyday shift for CHF. This order has a start date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to document a diagnosis and identify target behaviors to warrant the use of Risperidone (antipsychotic medication), complete a psychotropic medication assessment, and attempt a gradual dose reduction of Risperidone for one of three residents (R31) with a diagnosis of Dementia, reviewed for antipsychotic medications in the sample of 28. Findings include: 1. On 11/24/24 at 11:40 PM R31 was sitting in the facility's dining room in a wheelchair awaiting lunch. R31 was quiet, looking forward, smiled and did not exhibit any behaviors. On 11/25/24 at 9:15 AM, R31 was sitting in his wheelchair being pushed through the hallway of the facility. R31 was cooperative with mobility assistance throughout the building and was not exhibiting any behaviors. R31's current Physician Order sheet, dated 11/26/24, documents R31 has an order for Risperidone 0.25 milligrams (antipsychotic medication), Give one tablet by mouth two times a day for Dementia with behavioral disturbance. R31's current Care Plan, dated 11/21/24, documents R31…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and Universal Standard Precautions while providing incontinence cares to a resident with a pressure ulcer for one of 12 residents (R35) reviewed for Infection Control in the sample of 28. Findings include: R35's current Care Plan documents R35 has a stage two pressure ulcer to his coccyx. On 11/24/24 at 9:40 AM R35's door had a sign on his door that stated, Stop. Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Everyone must clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and staff must also wear gloves and a gown for the following high-contact resident care activities: Dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, or assisting with toileting, during device care or use, and during wound care. R35 was lying in bed and had a four-by-four gauze covering a pressure ulcer to his coccyx. During this time V3 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) and V4 (CNA) were providing incontinence cares to R35. During these…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure their infection prevention antibiotic stewardship program addressed prophylactic antibiotic use. This has the potential to affect all 34 residents in the facility. Findings include: An Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy excerpt dated 1/1/2018 instructs, Providers will utilize the Loeb Criteria when considering initiation of antibiotics. An excerpt of this policy dated 12/1/2017 states, At 72 hours after antibiotic initiation or first dose in the facility, each resident will be reassessed for consideration of antibiotic need, duration, appropriateness, and de-escalation potential. Within the Antibiotic Stewardship policy is the Loeb Criteria for determining presence of UTI. The Loeb Criteria instructs that residents with indwelling catheters are appropriate for antibiotic therapy if they demonstrate one of the following: a fever of 100 degrees Fahrenheit (100F) or repeated temperatures of 99F; new back pain or flank pain; acute pain;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during a dressing change for one of one resident (R182) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 20. Findings include: The CDC (Center for Disease Control website documents Keep PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) available in all sizes for staff and providers. Wear gloves during all stages of wound care including when applying new dressings. [NAME] gloves after performing hand hygiene. During an individual resident's wound care, doff gloves every time when going from dirty to clean surfaces or supplies. On 09/06/23 at 11:30AM V7 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) entered R182's room, put gloves on, took keys out of shirt pocket, unlocked cart, opened multiple drawers and removed supplies. V7 removed dressing from resident's right heel, sprayed gauze 4x4 with normal saline and rubbed in a circular motion. V7 removed gloves, put new gloves on, removed dressing from packaging, cut approximate amount and returned the rest to the package, and applied new dressing. On 9/6/23 at 11:38…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 6 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two staff members were present and a safety transfer (gait) belt was used during a resident transfer for one resident (R27), and failed to ensure falls were thoroughly investigated to determine a root cause of the falls and develop new fall prevention interventions for one resident (R18) of two residents (R27, R18) reviewed for accidents in a sample of 20. Findings include: 1. A Resident Handling Policy (Limited Lift Policy) dated 11/1/2008 states, Mandatory gait (safety transfer belt) belt usage for all resident handling with the exception for bed mobility (and) medical contraindications. R27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents R27 requires the extensive assistance of two staff to transfer between surfaces including to or from bed, chair, wheelchair and standing position. R27's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R27 is at high risk for falling because of risk factors that include a balance problem…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify adverse target behaviors or document a diagnosis to warrant the use of an antipsychotic medication for one of four residents (R27) reviewed for psychoactive medication use in a sample of 20. Findings include: A Psychotropic Medication Program policy (undated) gives as its purpose, To prevent the use of unnecessary medications. Under procedures and key points, this policy states, Assessment will begin when facility staff determines the resident is exhibiting untoward behaviors that place the resident, or their peers in danger. The social services department shall be alerted when noting any untoward behavior. Upon the noting of behaviors focus charting will be initiated for ongoing assessment. The nursing staff along with the IDT (interdisciplinary team) will attempt to identify any potential causes for the untoward behavior. This may include but not limited to, acute health conditions, social settings, personal choices and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to prevent occurrences of physical and verbal abuse for one of three residents (R5) reviewed for abuse in a total sample of 15. Findings Include: The Facility's Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy dated 2/2018 documents the definition of Abuse as, The willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse and mental abuse, including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. The Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy defines verbal abuse as, The use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of physical and verbal abuse to the Administrator for one of three residents (R5) reviewed for abuse in a total sample of 15. Findings Include: The Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy dated 2/2018 documents all employees will be trained on, Communication of reports of resident mistreatment, neglect, and/or abuse, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of property. This policy also documents, Employees must always report any abuse or suspicion of abuse immediately to the Administrator. R5 and R6's Medical Records document that R5 and R6 are a married couple who were both admitted on [DATE], both with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 4/15, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. R6's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to investigate allegations of physical and verbal abuse for one of three residents (R5) reviewed for abuse in a total sample of 15. Findings Include: The Facility's Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy dated 2/2018 defines verbal abuse as, The use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. This policy further documents physical abuse as, Hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking. This policy also documents, It is the policy of (This Facility) that reports of abuse are promptly and thoroughly investigated. R5 and R6's Medical Record document that the married couple were both admitted on [DATE] both with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia. R5's Progress Notes (7/29/22 at 11:23 AM) document R5 was noted to have blood running down his arm.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and remove a fall hazard for one resident (R5) of four residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 15. Findings include: The facility's (undated) Fall Prevention and Follow up policy, documents, Staff will follow the procedures as outlined in this policy in attempts to limit and/or prevent the occurrence of falls. A fall is defined as an unintentional change in position, coming to rest on the ground, floor or onto the next lower surface. This policy also documents, Post Fall Management will include: b. Registered Nurse will investigate fall circumstances and check to see that all prescribed interventions are in place and working properly. On 8/16/22 at 10:35 AM, R5 was sitting in a chair in his room with a walker at R5's bedside. R5 was confused with conversation and was unable to form sentences to communicate. R5's current care plan, dated 6/17/22, documents that R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This care plan also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-26 for 60 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BRUNS, PAULIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/15/2024
CASSENS, CYNTHIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/1981
GRONEWOLD, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2015
HEINECKE, CARLIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/15/2024
POST, CURTISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/07/2012
WAITE, LINDAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/15/2015
WATERKOTTE, JANAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2024
DIXON, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2018
HIGDON, BRITNEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/23/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 41%Medicare 11%Other / private 49%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$318per resident / day
operating cost
$9,669per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$265per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146111. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next