The Haven on the River
320 South 2nd Street, Grayville, IL 62844 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 66 certified beds · (618) 375-2171 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $338,630 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-03)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 16.9% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 92.0% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.6% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.1% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.1% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.1% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.1% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.7% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 41.9% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.64 | 2.02 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.58 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 18.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.3–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 18.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 18.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 13.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.15 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 46.4 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.15 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and failed to assess and monitor a resident's declining condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 18. This failure resulted in R1's hospital admission for acute kidney injury and hyperkalemia requiring emergent dialysis and subsequent death.This failure resulted in Immediate jeopardy, which was identified to have begun on 12/28/25 when the facility failed to obtain physician ordered labs of CBC (Complete Blood Count), CMP (Comprehensive Metabolic Panel) and TSH (Thyroid-stimulating hormone) for R1. The facility failed to follow up on UA (Urinalysis) and Culture and Sensitivity lab results that was ordered for R1 on 12/28/25. The facility failed to notify the physician of a decline in R1's condition. This failure resulted in R1 not getting timely medical treatment, which resulted in R1 being sent out the hospital on [DATE] by V25 (Family Member) and requiring emergent dialysis and then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from neglect for 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for neglect in the sample of 12. The failure resulted in R1 not receiving an immediate nursing assessment and treatment for a fall resulting in a hip fracture.Findings include:R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 3/18/26, and listed Diagnoses including Vascular Dementia, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented R1 had moderate deficits in cognition. R1's Care Plan, dated 4/30/26, documented a problem area, The resident is moderate risk for falls related to history of falls, poor safety awareness, impulsivity; resident sometimes crawls out of bed. A 3/18/26 admission Fall Risk Assessment documented that R1 was at high risk for falls.Nursing Progress Notes documented the following:5/19/26 9:36am: During morning med pass resident was resting comfortably in bed, took his meds and had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was available for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for pain in the sample 10. This failure resulted in R1's pain not being controlled post knee replacement surgery, causing R1 to become restless and anxious. R1 stated when he doesn't have the pain medication he doesn't move as much because of the pain.Findings Include:R1's admission Record, with a print date of 4/14/26, documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal right knee prosthesis, after care following knee joint prosthesis, fracture of right patella, depression, anxiety, heart failure, and seizures.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R1 had a recent knee replacement surgery and the Pain Assessment Interview documents R1 has frequent pain that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice that includes post fall assessment and treatment, monitoring, reporting, and investigating for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 falling and sustaining a hip and femur fracture without timely assessment and treatment after the fall. A reasonable person would experience feelings of discomfort and distress due to not receiving timely after fall care. This past non-compliance occurred between 11/14/25 and 11/16/25.Findings include:R1's Transfer/Discharge report, dated 12/2/25, documents an admission date of 12/3/2021 and a discharge date of 11/20/2025.R1's diagnosis report, dated 12/3/25, documents the following diagnoses in part, fracture of superior rim of right pubis, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, muscle weakness (generalized), other abnormalities of gait and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was properly assessed for injury and pain and to address resident complaints of pain post fall for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for pain in a sample of 6. R1 fell and sustained a hip and femur fracture without proper assessment of injury/pain. A reasonable person would experience feelings severe pain and discomfort due to not receiving pain relief medication. Findings include:R1's Transfer/Discharge report dated 12/2/25 documents an admission date of 12/3/2021 and a discharge date of 11/20/2025.R1's diagnosis report, dated 12/3/25, documents the following diagnoses fracture of superior rim of right pubis, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, muscle weakness (generalized), other abnormalities of gait and mobility, pain in right hip, unsteadiness on feet.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9, indicating R1 is moderately cognitively impaired. Section…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer a resident for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents in a sample of 5. This failure resulted in R1 falling from the lifting machine, hitting her head and receiving three staples to repair a 1.2 cm (centimeter) laceration to the back of her scalp.This past non-compliance occurred between 9/14/2025 and 9/15/25.Findings included:R1's admission Record documented R1 was admitted to this facility on 2/25/2025, with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, opioid dependency, chronic pain and spinal stenosis among others.R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/4/2025, documented R1 with a BIMS (Brief interview for Mental Status) score of 12 out of 15, which indicated R1 is cognitively intact. This same MDS under section GG (Functional Ability) documented R1 has impairment to both lower extremities and is dependent on staff for all transfers and toileting.On 9/29/2025 at 10:00am, R1 said on 9/14/2025 right after lunch, she needed to use the commode and put her call light on. R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide administrative oversight to ensure the facility implemented their policy to facilitate cooperation with regulatory bodies in connection with IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) surveys. This failure has the ability to affect all 45 residents living at the facility. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 3/18/26 and listed Diagnoses including Vascular Dementia, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented R1 had moderate deficits in cognition. R1's Care Plan, dated 4/30/26, documented a problem area, The resident is moderate risk for falls related to history of falls, poor safety awareness, impulsivity; resident sometimes crawls out of bed. A 3/18/26 admission Fall Risk Assessment documented that R1 was at high risk for falls.R1's Nursing Progress Notes, authored by V14, Licensed Practical Nurse, documented the following, with both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately initiate an investigation into a resident fall and failed to ensure a door remained closed to prevent elopements from residents at risk for elopement for 7 or 7 residents (R1, R4, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12) reviewed for accidents and supervision in a sample of 12.Findings include:1. R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 3/18/26, and listed Diagnoses including Vascular Dementia, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented R1 had moderate deficits in cognition. R1's Care Plan, dated 4/30/26, documented a problem area, The resident is moderate risk for falls related to history of falls, poor safety awareness, impulsivity; resident sometimes crawls out of bed. A 3/18/26 admission Fall Risk Assessment documented that R1 was at high risk for falls.Nursing Progress Notes documented the following:5/19/26 9:36am: During morning med pass resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a residents POA (Power of Attorney) and Nurse Practitioner of a fall and a decrease in oxygen saturation for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for notification in a sample of 12. Findings include:1. R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 3/18/26, and listed Diagnoses including Vascular Dementia, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented R1 had moderate deficits in cognition. R1's Care Plan, dated 4/30/26, documented a problem area, The resident is moderate risk for falls related to history of falls, poor safety awareness, impulsivity; Resident sometimes crawls out of bed. A 3/18/26 admission Fall Risk Assessment documented R1 was at high risk for falls.Nursing Progress Notes documented the following:5/19/26 9:36am: During morning med pass resident was resting comfortably in bed, took his meds and had no complaints. Later in the AM (morning) CNA's (Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was available for administration as ordered and antibiotics were administered timely for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 10. Findings Include:1. R1's admission Record, with a print date of 4/14/26, documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal right knee prosthesis, after care following knee joint prosthesis, fracture of right patella, depression, anxiety, heart failure, and seizures.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R1 had a recent knee replacement surgery and the Pain Assessment Interview documents R1 has frequent pain that occasionally effects his sleep, interferes with therapy activities, occasionally limits his day-to-day and the intensity of the pain is rated a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were administered as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 10.Findings Include:R1's admission Record, with a print date of 4/14/26, documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal right knee prosthesis, after care following knee joint prosthesis, fracture of right patella, depression, anxiety, heart failure, and seizures.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R1 had a recent knee replacement surgery.R1's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of, The resident has infection of the right knee prosthesis. Date Initiated: 03/28/2026. This Focus area includes Intervention of, Administer antibiotic as per MD (physician) orders. Date Initiated: 03/28/2026.R1's Order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed respond to a pharmacy review for an as needed psychotropic medication and failed to document the indication of use for the psychotropic medication for 1 of 3 resident (R2) reviewed for chemical restraints in a sample of 17. Findings include:R2's admission record, dated 3/18/26, documents an admission date of 1/19/26. R2's admission record documents diagnoses including but not limited to unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation; generalized anxiety disorder; Alzheimer's disease; and depression, unspecified.R2's physician order sheet, dated 3/18/26, documents orders for medications including but not limited to trazodone 50 milligram/mg tablet- take 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime with a start date of 3/14/26; pregabalin 25mg capsule - take 1 capsule two times per day for sleep with a start date of 1/27/26; citalopram 20mg tablet - take 1 tablet every day with a start date of 2/3/26.R2's Electronic Health Record (EHR) included an order, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide hot water for showers and personal care for 8 of 8 residents (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, R11, R13, R14) reviewed for environment in a sample of 14. Findings Included:On 2/21/26 at 8:30 AM, a digital metal stemmed thermometer used for taking temperatures for this survey was checked for accuracy using the ice-point method and was accurate within +/_ 2 degrees Fahrenheit. 1. On 2/21/26 at 9:30 AM, the North Hall Shower water temperature was taken at the shower head with a metal stemmed thermometer and the hot water measured 72 degrees Fahrenheit. The temperature of the hot water at the sink registered 95.3 degrees Fahrenheit 2. On 2/21/2026 at 9:35 AM, R6's and R13's bathroom sinks hot water temperature was taken with a metal stemmed thermometer and registered 95.5 degrees Fahrenheit. At that time where were both noted asleep in room. On 2/26/2026 at 11:20 AM, R6 was in her room alert and oriented and stated the water in her bathroom sink…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to provide needed care in a timely manner. This failure has the potential to affect all 45 residents residing in the facility.The findings include:On 01/22/26 at 10:35AM, R2 who was alert to person, place, and time, stated she had to wait over 30 minutes last night for someone to come answer her call light. R2 said she is glad she really didn't need anything important. R2 had her call light on to see what all staff were working on 01/21/26 for the 6p to 6a shift. R2 stated, They must not have had a lot of staff because it took forever for them to answer my light and when someone did answer my light it was (V1, Administrator) who answered my call light. R2 said she has problems like this all the time, especially in the evening where it will take the staff 30 minutes to an hour to answer her call light, she said usually they might have just 1 certified nurse assistant on her hall and 1 certified nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a resident's right to receive timely care and be treated with dignity for 4 of 18 residents (R2, R5, R6 and R12) reviewed for resident rights in a sample of 18. This failure has the potential to affect 26 residents residing on the North Hall.The findings include:1. R2's admission record, dated 02/02/26, documents an admission date of 11/23/2022 with diagnoses in part of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, lack of coordination, and hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure.R2's Care Plan documents a focus are with a date initiated of 08/27/25, of R2 is at risk for impaired skin integrity r/t (related to) history of vascular wounds, hx (history) of MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage): refusing to be turned and repositioned and prefers to lie in one position: dx (diagnosis) DMII (Diabetes Mellitus Type 2), chronic resp (respiratory) failure with hypoxia, COPD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer prescribed medications at the prescribed time. This failure has the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:1. R3's Face Sheet documents an admission date of 11/23/22, with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic venous hypertension, chronic congestive heart failure, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] in section C, documents R3 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R3 is cognitively intact. Section N of same MDS documents R3 is ordered the following classes of medications: diuretic, opioid, antiplatelet, and hypoglycemic (insulin).R3's Care Plan, dated 7/17/25, documents a focus area that R3 is on diuretic therapy related to edema. Interventions for this focus area include administering diuretic medications as ordered by physician with an initiation date of 4/10/23. Another focus area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medical records requested to aide in the survey process for 2 of 2 residents (R3 and R4) reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 19.Findings includeOn 8/14/25, this surveyor reviewed the July 2025 Medication Administration Records (MAR's) for R3 and R4 in their Electronic Health Records. The MAR's for R3 and R4 did not document the actual time the medication was administered.On 8/14/25 at 3:30 PM, this surveyor requested R3 and R4's July 2025 MAR's with documented and timestamped medication administration times from V2, Director of Nurses (DON).On 8/18/25 at 8:00 AM, V2, DON, stated he had been instructed by V24, Chief Operating Officer, not to provide the copies of R3 and R4's MAR's with documentation of the times the medications were administered or allow this surveyor to visualize them in the Electronic Health Record.On 8/18/25 at 3:20 PM, V2, DON, he stated he was instructed by V24 not to turn the time stamped MAR's R3 and R4 over to this surveyor because the facility had started an internal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure resident care needs are met. This failure has the potential to affect all 47 residents living in the facility. The findings include: 1. R1's admission Record, dated 06/17/25, documents an admission date of 11/23/2022, with diagnoses in part of type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney diseases, and chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents in Section C a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicates R1 is cognitively intact. Section GG documents eating as setup and clean-up assistance, and toileting, personal hygiene, and showering as dependent. R1's Care Plan, with a revision date of 04/07/23, documents a focus area of R1's requires extensive assistance with ADL's (Activities Daily Living) r/t (related to) reduced mobility, lack of coordination, impaired mobility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to change an indwelling urinary catheter per physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for urinary catheters in a sample of 16. Findings include: R1's admission Record documents an admission date of 11/23/22, with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, benign lipomatous neoplasm of kidney, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents R1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. Section H, Bladder and Bowel, documents R1 was indwelling urinary catheter. R1's Care Plan documents a Focus area with an initiation date of 6/8/23 of: High Risk for Urinary Tract Infection due to: Indwelling Catheter. Documented interventions include Change catheter and drainage bag per MD orders with an initiation date of 6/8/23. R1's Order Summary Report, with a print date of 6/17/25, documents an order of, Catheter: 18 FR (french) Coude catheter with 10cc…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was accurately coded for 1 (R9) of 1 resident reviewed for accuracy of assessments in the sample of 28. Findings Include: R9's admission Record documented R9 as a 71 -year -old, with an admission date of 02/22/2024 to the facility. Diagnoses listed are unspecified atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, edema, primary osteoarthritis of left knee, obesity, venous insufficiency, poly osteoarthritis, pain in leg, and unspecified osteoarthritis. R9's Illinois PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Summary of Findings, dated 03/22/2024, documented, Level II Outcome- Approved No SS (Specialized Services). R9's MDS with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/02/2024 documented this MDS as being an annual assessment. Section A1500. Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) asks Is this resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition? The answer was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure wound treatment per physician's orders for one resident (R31) of three residents reviewed for pressure wounds in the sample of 28. Findings include: R31's admission Record documented an admission Date of 4/7/25, and listed Diagnoses including Chronic Kidney Disease, Polyneuropathy, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. R31's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented R31 had minimum deficits in cognition, and had one stage 3 pressure ulcer. R31's May 2025 Physicians Orders Sheet (POS) documented a 4/25/25 order for, Wound to Right Buttock/Ischium: Cleanse with wound cleanser, apply barrier wipe to peri wound, cover with calcium alginate, cover with bordered gauze every day shift and as needed. R31's May 2025 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) documented an order, Wound to Right Buttock/Ischium, cleanse with wound cleanser, apply barrier wipe to peri wound, cover with calcium alginate. Cover with bordered gauze every day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide range of motion services to 1 (R9) of 1 resident reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 28. Findings Include: R9's admission Record documented R9 as a 71 -year -old with an admission date of 02/22/2024 to the facility. Diagnoses listed are unspecified atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, edema, primary osteoarthritis of left knee, obesity, venous insufficiency, poly osteoarthritis, pain in leg, and unspecified osteoarthritis. R9's Physician's orders, with a print date of 05/15/2025, do not document an order for any range of motion or restorative nursing program. R9's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set), with a date of 03/26/2025, noted R9's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15, which indicates R9 is cognitively intact. Section GG documents for functional limitation in range of motion that R9 has impairment on both sides of lower extremities. Section GG for self-care documents R9 requires substantial / maximum assist for upper body dressing. Section GG documents R9 is dependent for toileting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor weights and meal intakes for a resident with significant weight loss for 1 (R45) of 5 residents reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 28. Findings include: R45's admission Record documented an admission Date of 1/30/25, and listed Diagnoses including early onset Alzheimers Disease and Osteoarthritis. R45's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented R45 had severe deficits in cognition, and required at least partial or moderate assistance for eating. R45's May 2025 Physicians Orders Sheet (POS) documented an order for regular diet with puree texture and thin liquids. This POS also documented an order for weekly weights, with an order date of 4/17/25. R45's Care Plan, dated 2/3/25, documented a problem area, (R45) is at risk for altered nutrition. R45's Meal Documentation Report for April 2025 showed missing documentation of at least one meal on the following dates: 4/1/25, 4/2/25, 4/7/25, 4/8/25, 4/12/25, 4/14/25, 4/16/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier infection control precautions for two residents (R31, R42) of six residents reviewed for infection control in the sample of 28. Findings include: 1. R31's admission Record documented an admission Date of 4/7/25, and listed Diagnoses including Chronic Kidney Disease, Polyneuropathy, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. R31's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented R31 had one stage 3 pressure ulcer. On 05/14/25 at 2:33 PM, on R31's door was a sign stating, Enhanced barrier precautions. Everyone must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and staff must also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following high contact resident care activities: Wound care-any skin opening requiring a dressing. At that time V9, Licensed Practical Nurse, was observed entering the room to provide wound care for R31. V9 donned gloves, but no gown. 2. R42's admission Record documented an admission Date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were scheduled / available to provide timely care to meet the resident's needs. This failure has the potential to affect all 47 residents residing at the facility. Findings Include: 1. R5's admission Record documented R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure, morbid obesity, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, stage 3, diverticulitis, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R5 is cognitively intact. Section GG of R5's MDS documented R5 is dependent for toileting, showers, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to turn and reposition 2 (R5 and R9) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 13. Findings Include: 1. R5's admission Record documented R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure, morbid obesity, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, stage 3, diverticulitis, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R5 is cognitively intact. Section GG of R5's MDS documented R5 is dependent for toileting, showers, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. Section GG goes on to document R5 is dependent for rolling side to side. R5's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 5. Findings Include: R1's admission Record documented R1 was [AGE] years old, with an initial admission date to the facility of 11/23/2022. R1's admission Record documents the following diagnoses: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), type 2 diabetes mellitus, acute and chronic respiratory failure, morbid obesity, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, chronic diastolic heart failure, benign lipomatous neoplasm of kidney, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, gout, and personal history of healed traumatic fracture. R1's Care Plan, with a revision date of 4/10/23, documents under Focus that R1 is on diuretic therapy r/t (related to) edema. Interventions documented included Administer diuretic medications as ordered by the physician with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to allow an independent smoker the right to choose when to smoke for 1 (R44) of 2 residents reviewed for smoking in a sample of 27. Findings include: 1. R44's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 2/13/24, with diagnoses including: fracture of one rib right side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic bronchitis, spondylopathies lumbar region, hypertension, fibromyalgia, and generalized anxiety disorder. R44's 2/13/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating R44 was cognitively intact. This same MDS documented R44 was independent with lying to sitting, chair/bed- to - chair transfer supervision or touching assistance, partial/ moderate assistance with walking 10 feet, walking 50 feet with two turns was not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns, independent with wheeling 50 feet with two turns, independent with wheeling 150 feet once seated. R44's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) assessment tab documented no Safe Smoking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) status reflected resident wishes as desired throughout the Electronic Health Record for 1 (R25) of 12 residents reviewed for advanced directives in the sample of 27. Findings Include: 1. R25's face sheet documented an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses including: displaced avulsion fracture of tuberosity of right calcaneus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and unspecified glaucoma. R25's Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Practitioner order for Life- Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form documented a selection of Do Not Attempt Resuscitation/ DNR, with a signature of R25's Power of Attorney (POA) on [DATE], and a Physician signature on [DATE]. R25's Order Summary Report, printed [DATE] at 10:40 AM, documented a [DATE] Physician order for Full Code. On [DATE] at 10:28 AM, V5 (Registered Nurse/ RN) said R25 was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure referral and coordination of PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level II Screening was completed for 1 (R7) of 1 resident reviewed for PASARR assessments in the sample of 27. Findings Include: R7's admission Record documents a date of birth of [DATE], and an initial facility admission date of 1/29/21. This same document includes the following diagnoses: Other Schizophrenia with an onset date of 3/25/22, Major Depressive Disorder with an onset date of 11/17/20, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder, with an onset date of 12/17/12. R7's Notice of PASRR Level I Screen Outcome was dated 11/18/2020, prior to admission, and documented No Level II screening required. R7's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], section A1500 - Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition - Coded No. On 03/07/24 at 9:41 AM, V7 ( Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed for a resident with a diagnosed mental disorder for 1 (R44) of 1 resident reviewed for PASARR Screening in the sample of 27. Findings Include: R44's admission Record documented an initial admission date to the facility of 2/13/2024. R44's diagnoses listed on this form include, but were not limited to: Bipolar Disorder, Unspecified and Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Moderate. R44's Notice of PASRR Level I Screen Outcome, dated 2/13/2024, documented No Level II Required - No SMI (Serious Mental Illness) The PASRR Outcome Explanation Notice of No PASRR Level II Required report documents, Your Level I screen does not show that you have a serious mental illness or an intellectual/developmental disability (IDD). You do not need more screening unless you have or may have a serious mental illness or an IDD and experience a significant change in treatment needs. R44's PASRR Level I form section titled Diagnoses documents Mental Health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure required bathing assistance was provided to dependent residents for 1 (R8) of 1 resident reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care in the sample of 27. The Findings Include: R8's admission record documents an original admission date of 4/26/19, and a most recent re-admission date of 10/16/2023. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG of this same MDS documented R8 requires partial/moderate assistance with showers. (Partial/moderate assistance documents the helper does LESS THAN HALF the effort. Helper lifts, holds, or supports trunk or limbs, but provides less than half the effort). R8's current Care Plan documented a focus area of Self-Care Deficit As Evidenced by: Needs Limited assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) initiated on 12/28/21. The most recent revision to this was dated 1/10/22, with an intervention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents medication regimens were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 (R7) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 27. The Findings Include: R7's admission record documents a date of birth of [DATE], and an initial facility admission date of 1/29/21. This same document includes the following diagnoses: Other Schizophrenia with an onset date of 3/25/22, major depressive disorder with an onset date of 11/17/20, and generalized anxiety disorder with an onset date of 12/17/12. R7's current physician order for the month of March 2024 included the following medication orders: Risperidone 1 milligram, give one tablet by mouth in the evening for schizophrenia with a start date of 9/2/22. Alprazolam 0.25 milligram 1 tablet by mouth in the evening with a start date of 9/2/22. R7's behavior tracking for the last 3 months documented the following behaviors occurring: On 2/28/24, R7 on day shift had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when prescribed medications were not available for 3 (R1, R5, R6) of 8 residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. R1's face sheet documents R1was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including: Necrotizing Fasciitis and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. Section GG, Functional Abilities and Goals, Set-up/Clean-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene; independent with toileting hygiene, upper/lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and bed mobility; partial/moderate assistance with showering; and supervision with putting/taking off footwear and transfers. R1's Physician's Orders, dated 1/27/2023, documents Hydrocodone 10/325mg by mouth five times a day for pain with an open-end date. R1's Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to acquire and administer medications for 3 (R1, R5, R6) of 8 residents reviewed for pharmacy services in a sample of 8. Findings include: 1. R1's face sheet documents R1was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including: Necrotizing Fasciitis and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents in Section C, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. Section GG, Functional Abilities and Goals, Set-up/Clean-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene; independent with toileting hygiene, upper/lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and bed mobility; partial/moderate assistance with showering; and supervision with putting/taking off footwear and transfers. R1's Physician's Orders, dated 1/27/2023, documents Hydrocodone 10/325mg by mouth five times a day for pain with an open-end date. R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 (R1) resident reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3. The Findings Include: On 9/12/23 at 9:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated she had an insurance representative come to her and report R1 reported she had been thrown into bed by V2 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) and V3 (CNA). V1 stated she went down to R1's room and interviewed her regarding this report, and determined that it was not abuse. V1 confirmed at this time, she did not report this allegation of staff to resident physical abuse to the physician, family, police, or state agency and there are no notes in the medical record regarding this event. The facility's abuse policy, with a revision date of 4/18/23, documents , filing accurate and timely investigative reports. Any staff member or person suspected of abuse will be escorted by staff out of the facility and will be notified that they are not permitted back into the facility until the investigation has been complete. The facility will report all allegations of abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate alleged allegations of abuse for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for abuse investigations in a sample of 3. The Findings Include: On 9/12/23 at 9:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated she had an insurance representative come to her and report R1 reported she had been thrown into bed by V2 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) and V3 (CNA). V1 stated she went down to R1's room and interviewed her regarding this report, and determined that it was not abuse. V1 further stated she spoke with V2 and V3 regarding the allegation of throwing R1 into her bed. V1 stated she questioned them both as to whether they used the patient transfer disc with R1 during the transfer from chair to bed. V1 confirmed at this time, she did not report this allegation of staff to resident physical abuse to the physician, family, police, or State Agency, and there are no notes in the medical record regarding this event. V1 stated she only interviewed R1, V2, and V3. Once she interviewed R1, she determined it was not abuse, and did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label insulin pens with open dates for 4 of 7 residents (R9, R16, R30, and R31) reviewed for medication administration and storage in the sample of 24. Findings include: 1. R9's face sheet documented an admission date of [DATE], and diagnoses including: end stage renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, spinal stenosis. R9's Physician Order Sheet (POS) documented a [DATE] order for Insulin Aspart inject 6 units subcutaneously before meals . and Insulin Aspart inject as per sliding scale . subcutaneously before meals . and a [DATE] order for Levemir insulin inject 12 unit subcutaneously at bedtime . 2. R16's face sheet documented an admission date of [DATE], and diagnoses including: atherosclerotic heart disease, morbid obesity, Crohn's disease, diverticulitis of large intestine, mayor depressive disorder. R16's POS documented a [DATE] order for Humalog kwikpen inject as per sliding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to allow an independent smoker the right to choose when to smoke for 1 of 2 residents (R31) reviewed for smoking in a sample of 24 residents. Findings include: 1. R31's face sheet documented an admission date of 8/15/22, and diagnoses including: necrotizing fasciitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, insomnia. R31's 4/11/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R31 was cognitively intact. R31's 4/11/23 MDS section G documented R31 was steady at all times when: moving from seated position to standing position, walking (with assisted device if used), turning around and facing he opposite direction while walking, surface to surface transfer. R31's 3/29/23 Elopement Risk Assessment documented R31 was not considered at risk for elopement. R31's 2/3/22 Smoking Safety Screen documented Yes to the following questions: resident expresses understanding that smoking is not allowed near oxygen delivery systems and complies with this practice,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-21 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for 1 of 1 (R40) resident reviewed for discharge in a sample of 24. The Findings Include: R40's admission record documents an admission date of 2/17/23. R40's progress notes documents on 3/7/23 at 11:53 AM, he was being transported by ambulance home for discharge. On 4/21/23 at 11:00AM, V11 (Social Services) stated when a resident is discharged , there is a discharge summary that all departments are to fill out, regarding a summary of their stay here. V11 stated she cannot find where one of these forms was filled out for R40. On 4/21/23 at 11:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated she is unable to find a discharge summary at this time on R40.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify significant weight loss of a resident, and failed to notify the dietician and physician of the significant weight loss, for 1 of 2 residents (R11) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 24. The Findings Include: R11's admission record documents a date of birth of [DATE], and an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses listed on this admission record include: Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia. R11's undated care plan does not document any focus area related to weight or intake. R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] section G, documents R11 requires supervision (oversight, encouragement or cueing) of one staff at meals. Section K of this same MDS documents under Weight Loss: Loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more is 6 months- Yes, not on a physician prescribed weight loss regimen. R11's Current Physician Order Sheet documents as of [DATE] R11's current diet order is a regular consistency diet with thin liquids, health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$338,630 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $20,650 — penalty dated 2026-06-03
- $17,050 — penalty dated 2026-04-16
- $300,930 — penalty dated 2025-12-03
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-26 for 71 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $634K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146119. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.