Ryze At Homewood
19000 South Halsted, Homewood, IL 60430 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 259 certified beds · (708) 957-9200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Sep 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $413,568 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-19)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.3% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.7% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 99.6% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.4% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.5% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.3% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.2% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.8% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 40.6% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.3% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.9% | 13.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.62 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.45 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.4%CMS range 8.1–18.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.37 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 259 beds and averages 133.4 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 126 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.49 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.54 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.57 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
72 citations, most serious first. The 24 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to monitor and investigate how a resident with a history of drug usage was able to obtain illicit drugs in the facility. This failure affected one (R3) of three residents reviewed for supervision. As a result of this failure, R3, who did not have an independent outside pass privilege, tested positive for illicit drugs on 9/19/25, 9/25/25, and 10/3/25, requiring transfer to local hospital.The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9/19/25 when R3 was sent to the hospital and tested positive for illicit drugs while in the facility. V1 (Administrator) was notified on 12/23/25 at 1:38 PM of the Immediate Jeopardy.The surveyor confirmed by interview and record review the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 12/30/25, but noncompliance remains at level two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training.Findings include:R3 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the supervision of one cognitively impaired resident while in the dining room, failed to follow their policy and determine the cause of what triggered a door alarm on the memory care unit, and lacked an effective plan to ensure the outside gate was locked after landscapers/vendors exits. These failures affected one of three residents (R1) reviewed for supervision and elopement. These failures resulted in R1 exiting the locked memory unit and being found nearly one-half mile, after dark, from the facility by local police. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 08/01/2024 when R1 exited the facility unauthorized thru the locked memory care door. V8 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 09/04/2024 at 1035am. The surveyor confirmed by observation, record review, interview that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 09/04/2024, but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep two residents (R3 and R5) free from resident-to-resident physical abuse after R3 was punched in the right eye by another resident (R4), and R5 was slapped on the head by another resident (R1) for two out of five residents reviewed for abuse in a total sample of nine. This failure resulted in R3 sustaining blunt head trauma and a swollen, black eye.Findings Include:1.R3 is a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted in the facility on 5/1/2024. R3 is assessed to be alert, able to make needs known, forgetful at times.R4 is a [AGE] year-old male resident admitted in the facility on 7/8/2025.On 9/16/2025 at 12:07 PM, R3 observed in her room lying in bed. R3 was able to answer questions appropriately, but noted forgetful at times. There was slight purplish discoloration around the right eye observed. R3 was able to remember there was a guy who punched her hard on the face.On 9/16/2025 at 12:10 PM, R3 stated she remembers there was a guy who hurt her on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-06-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and document a dependent resident's fluid intake for all meals that required one to one supervision during meals and failed to assess for signs and symptoms of dehydration. This affected one of four residents (R1) reviewed improper nursing care and dehydration. This failure resulted in R1 being emergently transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with severe hypernatremia (excessively high sodium level in the blood) and AKI (Acute Kidney Injury). R1 was hospitalized for 5 days requiring intravenous fluids and antibiotic treatment. Findings include: R1 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to Cerebral Infarction, Dementia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Hypernatremia, Epilepsy, and Hyperlipidemia. R1's comprehensive assessment section C cognitive patterns, dated 3/31/25, documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 9 out of 15. R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. R1 was initially admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for daily wound care treatments were completed as ordered; failed to ensure daily monitoring of a wound for presence of possible complications such as signs of increasing area of ulceration or signs of soft tissue infection; and failed to ensure care plan interventions for alteration in skin integrity were implemented for one (R1) of four residents reviewed for wound care. These failures resulted in R1 developing a worsening coccyx pressure ulcer and require transfer to a local hospital with a diagnosis of septic shock due to pressure wound infection requiring admittance to the intensive care unit for five days. Findings include: R1 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to Cerebral Infarction, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Hypertension. R1 was originally admitted to the facility from the hospital on 1/8/25. R1's admission assessment documents a community…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the physician and obtain an order to transport a resident with an acute change in mental status and respiratory status to the hospital. This affected one of three residents (R1) reviewed for acute change in condition. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing an acute change in condition at on 10.13.24 at approximately 7:00am, and the facility staff not notifying the physician or calling EMS until 10:44am. R1 was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia and sepsis secondary to pneumonia. Findings include: R1's EMS (Emergency Medical Services) run sheet, dated [DATE], notes EMS 911 was notified at 10:44AM for an unresponsive resident. Emergency crew was dispatched and arrived at R1's bedside at 10:54AM. R1 remained unresponsive to verbal and painful stimuli throughout transport to the hospital. R1's heart rhythm showed atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. R1's lung sounds with rhonchi (gurgling)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an incident of resident-to-resident physical assault. This affected two of three residents (R9, R10) reviewed for physical abuse. This failure resulted in R10 pushing R9 to the ground unprovoked, and R9 sustaining an extensive intraparenchymal and subarachnoid hemorrhages from hemorrhagic contusions and extensive skull fractures extending from the vertex anteriorly and posteriorly. Findings include: R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of dementia without behavioral disturbances, hypertension, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit. R9 brief interview for mental status, dated 7/23/24, documents should not be conducted because resident is never /rarely understood. R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia without behavioral disturbances, cognitive communication deficit, and major depressive disorder. R10's Brief Interview for Mental Status score, dated 7/8/24, documents a 13/15, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety measures were in place to prevent avoidable resident accidents. This affected two of three (R7, R8) reviewed for safety. This failure resulted in R7 wheelchair not being secured in a medivan, R7 sliding out of the wheelchair sutaining a comminuted transversely impacted fracture of the right tibial (shin bone) and fibula (long slender bone in the lower leg that run alongside the tibia) requiring surgical intervention and the application of a long leg cast and a left proximal tibia fracture with hemarthrosis (bleed into joint space) requiring aspiration and application of long-leg splint; and facility staff not applying foot/leg support to R8's wheelchair resulting in R8 feet hitting the ground abruptly stopping and falling forward while being pushed by staff. R8 sustained a laceration to the left eye which required four sutures. Findings Include: 1. R7's progress note, dated 9/9/24, documents: Resident returned from emergency room. Per the previous nurse, resident was sent to the hospital from the dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident in the locked unit who was assessed as high fall risk (R1) and failed to ensure two staff were used when providing care for a resident (R7) per the resident's plan of care. These failures affected two (R1, R7) of four residents reviewed for falls and resulted in R1 sustaining a laceration to her head that required treatment for scalp laceration and R7 sustaining a head laceration. Findings include: 1. R1 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Past medical history includes, but not limited to: unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, vitamin D deficiency, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known psychological condition, vitamin B deficiency, and cognitive communication deficit. Fall care plan, dated 9/1/1023, stated R1 is at risk for falls d/t (due to) use of antipsychotic medications and weakness. Interventions include, provide proper, well-maintained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall for high fall risk resident with poor sitting balance by not providing 2 persons assist during a shower. This affected one of three residents (R1) reviewed for safety and falls. This failure resulted in R1 falling out of the shower chair on 1/24/24, being transported to the local hospital for treatment, and recieving 7 sutures to the left eyebrow area. Findings include: R1's face sheet shows diagnosis of other lack of coordination, need for assistance with personal care, abnormal posture, muscle wasting and atrophy multiple sites, weakness, cognitive communication deficit, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting unspecified side, and muscle weakness (generalized). R1's care card, dated 10/23, denotes at risk for falls, extensive assist with grooming, mobility wheelchair/ broda, transfer x 2, additional information denotes fall precautions, dysem…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide two staff assistance while providing incontinence care. This failure applied to one (R1) of three residents reviewed for falls, and resulted in R1 having a fall while being provided care from one staff member, and subsequently had to be transferred to the local hospital for evaluation and treatment of laceration; R1 required sutures with a skin closure device. The past noncompliance occurred from 10/24/23 to 10/25/23. Findings include: R1's face sheet documents R1 is a [AGE] year old female with diagnoses that include stroke, diabetes, and weakness. R1's facility assessment, dated 8/23/23, documents R1 is severely cognitively impaired and in need of two person extensive assist for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R1's fall risk assessment, dated 10/24/23, show R1 was high risk for falls. R1's progress notes, dated 10/24/23, document, observed resident to the floor with face forward and on the floor. Per CNA, she was changing resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent or determine how an injury of unknown origin occurred for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for resident injuries in a total sample of three. This failure resulted in R1 suffering a right hip fracture after being sent to the hospital for right thigh swelling and not being able to stand. Findings Include: R1 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: fractured neck of the right femur, urinary tract infection, myocardial infarction, dementia, and history of falling. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score is a six (severe cognitive impairment). A Nursing note, dated 9/19/23, documents it was brought to the nurse's attention by other staff, R1 could not stand or sit on the edge of the bed. Upon assessment, R1's right thigh was swollen. No bruises or redness were noted. R1 verbalized pain on the affected side. The physician was notified and ordered to send R1 to the hospital for an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Deficienices at this level require 2 Deficient Practice Statements. A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident (R43) with elopement behaviors for residents reviewed for elopement. This failure resulted in R43 eloping and being found unresponsive in the community, sustaining a traumatic muscle injury, and being hospitalized . B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for accident prevention by not providing adequate staff assistance for a resident who requires two-person assist for bed mobility and transfers, and not providing a cognitively impaired and agitated resident who was refusing care with adequate time to perform activities of daily living, for 2 residents (R20 and R71) reviewed for supervision and accidents Findings include: A.1. R43 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility to follow their weight loss policy to develop a plan to reduce an insideous unplanned weight loss and failed to notify the physician of a significant weight loss. This affected 1 of 3 residents (R126) in a sample of 133. This failure resulted in R126 having a 11.7% weight loss in 30 days. Findings include: R126's weight variance report, dated 7/1/22-09/12/22, documents: 09/12/2022 Weight: 147.6 lbs 08/07/2022 Weight: 167.2 lbs 07/08/2022 Weight: 170.0 lbs On 10/18/22 at 12:58 PM, V23 (Dietitian) said, I saw (R126) on 9/13/22 for a weight loss of 11.7% decrease since 8/7/22. The full reason of (R126's) weight loss was unclear. (R126) denied any change in eating habits and reported only having four working teeth. (R126) was on a regular diet. I increased (R126's) health shakes to 4ounces twice a day. I ordered weekly weights. The weekly weights were not done. I did not see any weekly weights . If I had seen (R126's) weights, I would have written a progress note. I don't have any progress notes for (R126) related to the weekly weights.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to provide nursing and related services as determined by assessments, individual plan of care, number of residents, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. This failure has the potential to affect all 131 residents currently at the facility.The 1/12/26 facility census includes 73 (2nd floor) residents. 1.R1 resides on the 2nd floor. On 1/12/26 at 10:17 AM, R1 was lying atop of a LALM (Low Air Loss Mattress), however, the setting was on static (firm) mode (the setting should be on alternate mode - while lying in bed). Several large white clumps of food were observed on R1's chest. R1 affirmed he was served Grits for breakfast. R1 also affirmed he was unable to move the right upper extremity. R1's indwelling urinary catheter tubing was notably cloudy with chunks of purulent substance floating in the urine and heavy sediment. On 1/12/26 at 10:22 AM, V14, Licensed Practical Nurse, was asked if R1 has any wounds. V14 (LPN/Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure five residents (R5, R16, R58, R74, and R76), out of a sample of 54 residents reviewed for resident rights, were treated with dignity and respect.Findings include: Record review of facility mealtimes indicates the 300/400 dining room mealtime is 12:15 PM. 1.On 1/12/2025 at 12:45 PM, R71 was observed sitting in the 300/400 dining room watching other residents at R71's table eat. R71 was not served any lunch. All other residents in the dining room were served lunch and approximately 25% of the residents had finished eating. R71 affirmed R71 was hungry and didn't know why R71 was not served a lunch tray. V41 (Activity Aide) confirmed R71 did not receive a lunch tray, that all other residents were served/eating, and approximately 25% of the residents had already finished eating. V41 was unsure why R71 did not get lunch served to them, stating, I don't know what happened, I don't think a tray came down for (R71). Someone is looking into it and we're getting (R71) a tray. V41 affirmed R71 not getting a tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were within reach, failed to ensure resident equipment was clean, failed to ensure equipment (in use) was in good condition, failed to ensure sheets covered the mattress while in use, failed to ensure soiled bed linens were changed, failed to ensure requested condiments were provided, and failed to ensure staff provided assistance when resident socks were wet and needed to be changed for six of 54 residents (R2, R13, R27, R32, R88, R94) in the sample. Findings include: 1.On 1/12/26 at 10:37AM, R13's wheelchair (including wheel spokes) was notably soiled with white debris and the arm rests were severely cracked (almost all the vinyl was missing). On 1/12/26 at 10:40 AM, V23 (Central Supply) was asked about the appearance of R13's wheelchair. V23 (Central Supply) stated, It's a little old. On 1/12/26 at 10:47 AM, V13 (Wound Care Coordinator) was asked if R13's wheelchair appeared clean. V13 (Wound Care Coordinator) responded, The wheels? No. V13 was asked about the appearance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure esident curtains were hung properly, failed to ensure dining room tables/resident rooms are cleaned timely for four (R11, R56, R69, R88) residents, failed to ensure the 700 unit shower room was clean, failed to discard soiled toilet paper, failed to replace the shower head, failed to repair broken floor tiles in the shower, and failed to ensure soiled linen was placed in the laundry for 23 residents residing on the 700 unit in a total sample of 54 reviewed for homelike environment. Findings include: The 1/12/26 census includes 23 residents residing on the 700 unit. 1.On 1/12/26 at 10:52 AM, R11's curtain was noted to be dangling from the track with 23 hooks not attached. R11 stated, The curtains are falling off. I told 'em (sic) about a week ago to fix the curtains. One of the staff pulled it and the hooks came off. 2.On 1/12/26 at 11:20 AM, the 2nd 700 unit shower was inspected with V21 (Health Information Manager). The beige double sinks were notably soiled with a white substance. The countertop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care was provided to 10 of 54 dependent residents (R1, R2, R3, R13, R27, R29, R54, R78, R79, R121) in the sample reviewed for ADL care.Findings include: 1.R1's 8/15/24 care plan states resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit related to hemiplegia/hemiparesis. R1's 12/13/25 functional assessment affirms resident is dependent on staff for dressing. R1's 12/13/25 BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 7 (severe impairment). On 1/12/26 at 10:17 AM, several large white clumps of food were observed on R1's chest. R1 affirmed he was served Grits for breakfast. R1 also affirmed he was unable to move the right upper and lower extremities. On 1/12/26 at 10:22 AM, V14 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, I see he dropped some food on his shirt. R1 replied, I ate some grits today and it fell out the bowl. V14 made no effort to remove the food off R1's chest and/or change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure corridors have firmly secured handrails. This failure has the potential to affect all 32 residents that reside on the 300 and 400 units. Findings include: Facility census documents 12 residents reside on the 300 unit, and 20 residents reside on the 400 unit. On 1/12/2026 at 10:56 AM, observed the handrails loose (unsecured) and able to shift approximately 2 inches up or down outside room [ROOM NUMBER], 310, 311, and 312. The handrail outside room [ROOM NUMBER] was able to shift approximately 4 inches up or down, and all screws were visible loose coming out of the brackets. When light pulling pressure was applied to the handrail, the handrail began to disconnect from the wall. V8 (Maintenance Director) observed the handrails and confirmed the observations. V8 affirmed handrails should be tightly secured to the walls. V8 stated residents use the handrails for balance, safety, and to propel themselves down the hallway when in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions and failed to provide supervision to one of 54 residents (R140); failed to ensure the 300 unit emergency exit door (egress) was able to be opened; and failed to ensure the 300 unit emergency exit door alarmed when opened affecting twelve 300 unit residents. Findings include: 1.R140 was [AGE] years old admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include but not limited to dementia, metabolic encephalopathy, adult failure to thrive, muscle wasting/atrophy, lack of coordination, and repeated falls. R140 was transferred to the hospital on 9/23/25 post fall(s) and did not return to the facility. R140's (8/28/25) admission evaluation includes a fall risk score of 21 (high risk). R140's (9/8/25) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) determined a score of 7 (severe impairment). R140's (9/8/25) functional assessment affirms resident required substantial/maximal assistance with chair/bed to chair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, failed to implement care plan interventions, failed to follow physician orders, failed to notify the physician of abnormal urine, failed to document abnormal urine, failed to obtain orders for urinalysis/culture, failed to ensure urinary catheter bags remain below the bladder level to prevent backflow and potential UTI (Urinary Tract Infection), and failed to ensure a nephrostomy tube drainage bag was placed below the kidney level to prevent backflow of urine into the kidney and the potential for kidney infection. These failures affected three residents (R1, R4, R13) in the sample of 54 residents. Findings include: 1.R1's diagnoses include (6/7/25) UTI. R1's 12/7/25 Physician Order Sheets state change urinary bag as needed when clinically appropriate every 8 hours as needed. R1's 6/5/25 care plan states resident requires use of an indwelling catheter related to diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Intervention: keep drainage bag lower than level of bladder. Monitor for signs/symptoms of UTI. Notify medical doctor of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespreadEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of an unwitnessed fall with potential head injury affecting one resident (R1) and failed to properly in-service staff on the Fall Risk Assessments. These failures affected one resident (R1) reviewed for falls and has the potential to affect all the residents residing at the facility. Findings include:Facility census, dated 12/08/25, documents 129 residents residing at the facility.Record review of CMS's RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Chapter 3 Item (J), dated October 2024, documents, Falls are a leading cause of injury, morbidity, and mortality in older adults. A previous fall, especially a recent fall, recurrent falls, and falls with significant injury are the most important predictors of risk for future falls and injurious falls. Identification of residents who are at high risk of falling is a top priority for care planning. A previous fall is the most important predictor of risk for future falls. The fall may be witnessed, reported by the resident or an observer or identified when a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete Fall Assessments for four residents (R1, R6, R7 and R8), who have a history of falling. This failure has the potential to affect four residents (R1, R6, R7 and R8) in a sample of six residents (R1, R4, R5 R6, R7 and R8) reviewed for falls.Findings include: 1.R1 no longer resides at the facility. R1 expired on [DATE].R1's face sheet documents diagnoses that include but not limited to hypertension, metabolic encephalopathy, osteomyelitis of vertebra, type 2 diabetes, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acquired absence of left leg below the knee, quadriplegia, acute kidney failure, and sepsis.R1's BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score, per admission note dated [DATE], documents a BIMS score of 9, which indicates R1's cognition is moderately impaired.Facility document titled, Incidents by Incidents Type, dated [DATE], documents R1's fall occurred on [DATE] at 8:30pm.R1's progress note, dated [DATE] at 1:09am, per V14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent and protect a resident from staff to resident misappropriation of resident property. This failure affected one resident (R1) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. As a result of this failure, R1 felt awful, targeted, afraid, trapped, and unsafe. Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has diagnoses including but not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, encephalopathy, and generalized anxiety disorder. R1'S Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] section C0500, documents Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicates cognition is intact. MDS section GG0130, dated 4/10/2025, documents resident requires supervision or touching assistance for eating and oral hygiene. Resident is dependent for the following: toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, and personal hygiene. On 6/24/2025, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a Dietary Manager available to ensure daily Dietary services were performed appropriately and efficiently resulting in residents not receiving meals according to their preferences, requests, needs, or the facility's menu; residents not being served in a timely and consistent manner; residents not receiving food at an appetizing temperature; and dry food not being stored under sanitary conditions. These failures applies to all 131 residents receiving food from the facility. Findings include: On 06/12/2025 at 9:51 AM, R1 stated, Yesterday, (Wednesday), they were serving fish for lunch. I asked for a cheeseburger instead and was still served the fish. I was told 'sorry we missed your nam'e, even though they have a list. R1 stated the food sometimes is served lukewarm. The facility's lunch menu for Wednesday (06/11/2025) of the week three menu cycle included: Fried Fish. On 06/12/2025 at 10:22 AM, R2 stated yesterday he requested a salad for lunch. They had him marked as no salad, although salad was not a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-06 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program effectively identified quality deficiencies and described how the facility would evaluate the effectiveness of corrective actions and performance improvement activities to address repeated deficiencies regarding infection control. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility survey history, documented in Casper Report 003D Provider History Profile, updated on 11/19/2024, revealed repeated non-compliance at Federal tag F880, infection control for 11/2021, 10/2022, and 9/2023. The facility's corrective actions following these deficiencies included re-educating nursing staff on infection control, and requiring the Director of Nursing (DON) or designee to conduct facility-wide infection control audits to ensure staff adherence to proper practices. Further review of training and education documentation, dated 9/26/2023, indicated facility staff were provided education on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for the administration of medication, oxygen and enhance barrier precautions. This deficiency affects all five (R14, R41, R56, R108, and R177) residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for Professional Standards of Practice. Findings include: 1. R177 wass admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses listed in part but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, Malignant neoplasm of stomach. Active physician order sheet indicated EBP (Enhanced barrier precaution) due to urinary catheter, dated 12/3/24. Order was written after surveyor inquired. On 12/3/24 at 11:00AM, R177 was on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) set up. V17, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), said R177 is on EBP due to indwelling catheter. On 12/4/24 at 10:06AM, R177 was lying in bed. She was confused. Observed medication ointment placed on 30ml medication cup, not labeled, at bedside. V17, LPN, said, It's probably barrier cream left by treatment nurse. No medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to determine self-administration of medication was appropriate for a resident whose medication was left at the bedside for the resident to self-administer for one of one resident (R20) reviewed for self-administration of medications in sample of 26. Findings include: An order summary report, dated 12/3/2024, indicates R20 has diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, mood disorder, Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, Cardiopulmonary disease, asthma, chronic respiratory failure, major depressive disorder, GERD, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease. R20's has medication orders for sodium bicarbonate 650mg, tamsulosin cap 0.4mg, torsemide 20mg, tums chewable 500mg, omeprazole 20mg, citalopram hydrobromide 20mg, Eliquis 5mg, farxiga 10mg, finasteride 5mg, carvedilol 6.25mg, multivitamin with minerals. R20's care-plan, dated 7/18/2024, indicates an intervention to give medications as ordered by a physician and monitor and document for side effects and effectiveness. On 12/3/2024 at 11:00 AM, R20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident call light was within reach. This deficiency affects two (R46, R72) of three residents in the sample for 26 reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: 1. R72 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses listed in part but not limited to cerebral infarction, covid-19, unspecified asthma, history of falling. R72 has a focus care plan for at risk for falls related to cerebral infarction, asthma, congestive heart failure. Intervention dated 8/19/24 -Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance. On 12/03/24 at 10:23 AM, R72 observed in room, in bed, and call light observed on floor behind privacy curtain. On 12/03/24 at 10:29 AM, V16 (Certified Nurse Aide) verified the call light was not within reach, and said R72 should have it next to her in bed in case she needs assistance to call for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibits prevention of resident abuse. This deficient practice 3 of 5 residents (R29, R41, R123) reviewed for abuse prevention program in a sample of 26. Findings include: On 12/5/2024 at 11:45 AM, R29 was noted with admission date of 11/13/2024 and Criminal History Information Response Process was initiated on 11/20/2024. R41 was noted with admission date of 11/1/2024 and Criminal History Information Response Process was initiated on 11/4/2024. R123 was noted with admission date of 11/2/2024 and Criminal History Information Response Process was initiated on 11/4/2024. On 12/5/2024 at 12:24 PM, V18 (Admissions) stated Criminal History Information Response Process (Background check) is done within 72 hours of admission, and is impossible to do within 24 hours, because V18 does not work after hours and on weekends. V18 said they have no policy on running and checking Criminal History Information Response Process. On 12/5/2024 at 02:15 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated all new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit information for preadmission screening and resident review for level l Preadmission screening and Resident Review (Preadmission screening resident review PASRR) and for a level ll evaluation for 1 of 4 resident's (R20) reviewed for PASRR in a sample of 26. Findings include: An order Summary Report indicates R20 has diagnoses of Post traumatic stress disorder, Unspecified Mood (Affective) Disorder, insomnia due to other mental disorder, major depressive disorder. On 12/5/2024 at 12:10 PM, V23 (Unit Manager) said, (R20) has very manipulative behavior. On 12/5/2024 V1 (Administrator) said, I do not have a Level 1 or a Level ll (PASRR) screening for (R20). I know all residents under [AGE] years of age should have a screening, and if indicated a level ll, but I do not have it. On 12/6/2024, V18 (Admissions Director) said, I am responsible for obtaining a preadmission screening and (R20) was grandfathered in. I was not aware I had to do a PASRR level…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow manufacturer's recommendation in using low air loss mattress to resident who has stage 4 pressure ulcer. This deficiency affects one (R6) of three resident in the sample of 26 reviewed for Pressure ulcer Management. Findings include: R6 was admitted on [DATE], with admitting diagnoses of Dementia, Type 2 Diabetes mellitus, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Acquired absence of left leg below knee. R6's active physician sheet indicated: Resident to have alternating pressure air mattresses to promote wound healing. Right hip- cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply xeroform and cover with a bordered gauze 3 times a week and PRN (as needed). Right buttocks- cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply xeroform and cover with a bordered gauze 3 times a week and PRN. R6's comprehensive care plan indicated: She has re-opened stage 4 pressure ulcer on right hip and right buttocks related to history of pressure ulcers and immobility. R6's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review ,the facility failed to implement fall preventive measures for a resident who has history of falls. This deficiency affects two (R21 and R56) of three residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for Fall prevention management. Findings include: 1. R56 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses listed in part but not limited to Chronic Obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Cognitive communication deficit, adult failure to thrive, Difficulty walking. R56's admission Fall assessment and most recent assessment dated [DATE], indicated she is at risk for fall. R56's comprehensive care plan indicated she is at risk for falls related to COPD, Respiratory failure. R56's unwitnessed fall incident, dated 11/26/24 at 6:50 PM, indicated: The resident was found lying on the floor on the side of her bed. She stated that she was getting up to use the bathroom. She was sent to the hospital for evaluation. Fall investigation/Root cause analysis was done. New care plan intervention in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to followa a physician's order for oxygen administration. This deficiency affects one (R96) of three residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for oxygen management. Findings include: R96 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses listed in part but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified asthma, unspecified chronic bronchitis, hypoxemia, dependence on supplemental oxygen. Active physician order sheet indicates: Change oxygen tubing weekly every night shift, Oxygen @ 4LPM (liters per minute) per nasal cannula, continuously. On 12/03/24 at 10:42 AM, R96 was observed in dining area, sitting in wheelchair with oxygen concentrator @ 6LPM (liters per minute) via nasal cannula, and no date or label on oxygen tubing. On 12/03/24 at 10:45 AM, V13 (Registered Nurse) verified R96 was receiving oxygen at 6LPM (liters per minute) via nasal cannula. V13 verified R92's physician order states R96 should be receiving oxygen at 4LPM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to act upon and implement medication recommendations in a timely manner. This deficiency affects two (R56 and R114) in the sample of three residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for Pharmacy medication review. Findings include: 1. R114 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses listed in part but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, Fracture of right femur, Abnormality of gait and mobility, Repeated falls. R114's active physician order sheet indicated Aricept (Donepezil HCl) tablet 5mg give 1 tab by mouth one time a day for dementia ordered date 10/25/24. November 2024 indicated Aricept 5mg (Donepezil) 1 tablet by mouth given at 9AM daily. R114's Pharmacist drug regimen review, dated 11/11/24, indicated: Please take the following action described below. See report. R114's Pharmacist recommendation note to attending physician, dated 11/11/24, indicated, This resident has an order of Aricept (Donepezil) at 9am. Aricept should be dosed at bedtime…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have appropriate diagnosis for resident receiving anti-psychotic medications. This deficiency affects one (R110) of three residents reviewed for Psychotropic medication management. Findings include: R110 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses listed in part but not limited to Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following non traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, Aphasia, Vascular dementia with agitation, Anxiety disorder, Depression. R110's active physician order sheet indicates Risperdal (Risperidone) oral tablet 0.5mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Vascular Dementia for agitation, ordered 10/11/24. R110's comprehensive care plan did not address the anti-psychotic medication R110 is receiving. No care plan formulated for usage of anti-psychotic (Risperdal). No qualifying diagnosis. R110's AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) was completed by Unit Manager/Psychotropic Nurse dated 12/4/24, after surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hospice coordinated communication and plan of care are available and accessible to facility staff. This deficiency affects one (R177) of three residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for Hospice care services. Finding include: R177 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses listed in part but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, Malignant neoplasm of stomach. Active physician order sheet indicates that she is on hospice care upon admission. R177's comprehensive care plan indicates she is receiving end of life services with admitting diagnosis of Malignant neoplasm of stomach. No intervention was written in care plan. On 12/3/24 at 11:16AM, R177 was lying in bed, with oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 liters per minute (LPM). She has an indwelling catheter. She was confused, and needs total care with activity of daily living and transfers. V17, Licensed Practical Nurse, said she is on hospice care. On 12/4/24 at 10:12AM, V19, Social Service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices, such as hand hygiene and used of personal protective equipment (PPE), were performed during enteral feeding assessment, and failed to ensure the urinary catheter tubing and drainage bag was not touching the floor for infection control. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 1 of 3 residents reviewed for enteral feeding procedure (R51) and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheter management (R177) in a sample of 26. Findings include: 1. R1's records indicate: Order Summary Report: Diagnoses: Gastrostomy Status, Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase Order date 6/20/2024: Enteral Feed order every shift. Care Plan: Focus: R51 requires Enhanced Barrier Precaution d/t G-tube. On 12/4/2024 at 9:47 AM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse) entered R51's room, which displayed signage for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). V9, without performing hand hygiene, put her gloves on and proceeded to the room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a resident discharge from the facility, including the reasons for the move in writing, and failed to have a record that the local Ombudsman was notified of the discharge. This failure affected one (R3) of three residents reviewed for discharge. Findings include: R3 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], past medical history includes: Abdominal aortic aneurysm without rupture, essential primary hypertension, diabetes, other lack of coordination, need for assistance with personal care, alcohol abuse, history of falling, etc. Physician order. dated 6/11/2024. states: Discharge Home with Home Health, RN, Wound Care RN, Ok to Take Medication from facility. Progress note, dated 7/5/2024, states as follows: Resident discharged with belongings and medication. Transferred to community living home. Social service progress note, dated 7/2/2024, reads: (R3) is scheduled to discharge on [DATE] at 1PM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the environment in good repair and failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. These failures have the potential to affect all thirty residents residing on the fifth floor of the facility. Findings include: On 4/26/2024, V1 (Administrator) presented the facility's Daily Census document, which shows the resident census on the fifth floor was 30. On 4/26/2024 between 2:30 PM and 3:15 PM during facility rounds with V1, Administrator and V4, Maintenance Director, the following environmental conditions were observed: room [ROOM NUMBER] has some peeling paint on the wall; there are things all around the room that are in disarray; there are clean clothes and clean towels placed on top of the chair with other dirty clothes underneath; several disposable wipes are laying on top of the bedside table; the wall fan has a lot of dust and debris; the overbed light has a lot of dust and debris; there is a shoe horn and hanger in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and regularly assess a resident for arterial ulcers, who then developed necrosis to the right heel and right great toe. This failure applied to one (R3) of three residents reviewed for nursing care. Findings include: R3's Physician's Order Sheet, printed on 12/8/23, shows R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Right Femur Fracture, Dementia, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. R3's Nurse's Notes, dated 11/10/2,3 states, Writer informed per CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) resident had drainage on his sock upon removal, assessment done resident had brown drainage note on resident his sock great toe area, great noted with thick toenail, dry skin no visible open area noted, observed small amount of brown drainage from right great toe, nail bed, denies any pain or discomfort, ROM WNL (Range of Motion within normal limits), first aid rendered, dry dressing applied . On 12/8/23 at 12:20 PM, V5 (LPN- Wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided personal privacy during a physical assessment by a medical provider, and failed to ensure residents were provided privacy during blood glucose monitoring and insulin administration. These failures applied to six (R49, R71, R84, R94, R101, and R112) of six residents reviewed for nursing care in the sample of 33 residents. Findings include: R49 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Dementia and Chronic Kidney Disease. R71 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to: Parkinson's Disease, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Dementia and Cognitive Communication Deficit. R84 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Dementia and Schizophrenia. R94 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to: Alzheimer's Disease, Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy for infection control related to glucometer cleaning after resident use; failed to ensure that reusable equipment (wrist blood pressure cuff) was cleaned between use of residents; failed to perform hand hygiene prior to putting on PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) and after performing blood glucose monitoring; and failed to ensure infection control was maintained during tracheostomy care for a resident. These failures applied to four (R38, R101, R110, and R135) of four residents reviewed for nursing care in a sample of 29 residents. Findings include: R38 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to: Paraplegia, Tracheostomy status. R110 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to: Glaucoma and Type 2 diabetes mellitus with other diabetic ophthalmic complication. R135 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to: Hemiplegia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly address a resident's urinary catheter care needs by allowing the resident to continue the use of the same catheter that was leaking, while the resident was experiencing adverse symptoms, for a resident with a history of urinary tract infection (UTI). This failure applied to one (R78) of five residents reviewed for catheter care/UTI. Findings include: R78 is [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with past medical history of type two diabetes, recent left BKA, end stage renal disease, chronic kidney disease stage 3, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hypokalemia, iron deficiency anemia, and history of falling. On 09/08/2023 at 1:07 PM, Nurse practitioner note documented the following: HPI (History of Present Illness): Resident is a [AGE] year-old male, being seen in a follow up for Bacteriuria. Seen s/p (status post) recent hospitalization for two amputations on left leg, with the 2nd being a left BKA (below knee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for pain management by not regularly assessing and monitoring a resident's complaints of pain and by not communicating resident pain to a provider in a timely manner following a fracture. This failure applied to one (R7) of one resident reviewed for pain management. Findings include: R7 is a [AGE] year old male with a diagnoses history of Quadriplegia, Parkinson's Disease, Epilepsy, Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Osteoarthritis, who was admitted to the facility 04/02/2019. R7's progress note dated 09/13/2023 02:46 PM documents during repositioning R7 complained pain. Relief received, will continue to monitor. R7's progress note, dated 09/17/2023 at 11:16 AM, documents he was received in bed quietly with eyes open. R7's lower left extremity shows swelling and is warm to touch. Pain meds administered and became effective at this time. Nurse Practitioner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available during medication administration per physician orders for one (R135) of five residents reviewed during medication administration observation. Findings include: R135 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to: Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, Essential (primary hypertension, Age related nuclear cataract, bilateral, Presbyopia, and Myopia, bilateral. On 09/19/23 at 8:26 PM, medication administration was observed with V5, RN/Registered Nurse, on unit 100. V5 prepared medications for R135, and the following medications were not available for administration per the physician's order: *Lubricant Eye drop (carboxymethylcellulose-glycerin) 0.5%-0.9% administer 2 drops to each eye twice a day due to dry eyes. V5, RN, stated, I'm not seeing it (eye drops) here, I'll have to reorder it. The medication was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a five percent (5%) or lower medication error rate. There were three medication errors out of 25 medication opportunities resulting in a 12% medication error rate. This failure applied to two (R110, R135) residents reviewed during the medication administration task. Findings include: R135 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to: Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, Essential (primary hypertension, Age related nuclear cataract, bilateral, Presbyopia, and Myopia, bilateral. R110 is [AGE] years of age. Current diagnoses include but are not limited to: Glaucoma and Type 2 diabetes mellitus with other diabetic ophthalmic complication. On 09/19/23 at 8:26 PM, medication administration was observed with V5, RN/Registered Nurse, on unit 100. V5 prepared medications for R135 and the following medications were not available for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a physician about residents not receiving their ordered medications for four (R3, R4, R5, R6) of six reviewed for physician notification. Findings Include: 1. R3 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and transient ischemic attacks. The Medication Administration Record, dated 08/2023, documents on 8/20/23, R3 did not receive the following ordered medications: Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) - 1 tablet at 9AM; Insulin glargine 100 units/milliliter (mL) - 32 units at 9PM; Metformin 500 mg - 2 tablets at 9PM; Metoprolol 25 mg - 1 tablet at 9AM; Insulin NPH 100 unit/mL - 2 units at 4PM and 11PM; and Xarelto 2.5mg - 1 tablet at 9AM. Aspirin and Xarelto prevent blood clot formation, Insulin and Metformin help control blood sugar levels, and Metoprolol helps control high blood pressure. 2. R4 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: quadriplegia, adult failure to thrive, hypertension, chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to replace two open nursing shifts on day shift (7AM - 7 PM), and three open nursing shifts on night shift (7PM - 7AM) on 8/20/23, leaving two units during the day and three units during the night without a scheduled nurse, affecting 69 residents. Findings Include: R3 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and transient ischemic attacks. R4 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: quadriplegia, adult failure to thrive, hypertension, chronic embolism/thrombosis of the veins, and idiopathic epilepsy. R5 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes and hypertension. R6 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: hemiplegia following a cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, chronic kidney disease, and hypertensive heart failure. R6 was interviewed during this investigation, but was not able to remember if the facility was short staffed or if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the administration of medication as ordered by the physician. This affected four of four residents (R3-R6) reviewed for medication error, omission and medication administration. findings Include: 1. R3 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and transient ischemic attacks. The Medication Administration Record. dated 08/2023. documents on 8/20/23. R3 did not receive the following ordered medications: Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) - 1 tablet at 9AM; Insulin glargine 100 units/milliliter (mL) - 32 units at 9PM; Metformin 500 mg - 2 tablets at 9PM; Metoprolol 25 mg - 1 tablet at 9AM; Insulin NPH 100 unit/mL - 2 units at 4PM and 11PM; and Xarelto 2.5mg - 1 tablet at 9AM. Aspirin and Xarelto prevent blood clot formation, Insulin and Metformin help control blood sugar levels, and Metoprolol helps control high blood pressure. 2. R4 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: quadriplegia, adult failure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-19 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their bed hold policy by not providing bed hold notice at time of transfer for 4 of 4 (R32, R281, R2, R121) residents reviewed for bed hold. Findings Include: 1. R32 progress note, dated 10/12/22, documents: Resident is desaturating due to noncompliance and states she wants to go to the hospital. Resident was 72% pulse ox without oxygen and 90% pulse ox with oxygen. Doctor made aware family made aware new order carried out to transfer resident to ER. Review of R32's medical record does not document any bed hold notice given to resident. 2. R281 progress note, dated 6/14/22, documents R281 was transferred to local hospital due to change in condition. There is no documentation of bed hold notice given to resident. Review of R281's medical record does not document any bed hold notice given to resident. 3. Review of R2's medical record, dated 9/3/22, notes R2 was transported and admitted to the local hospital. There is no documentation found in R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy for dietary services to ensure its canned goods are dent free to prevent contamination of meals served to its residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 133 residents that consume meals prepared by this facility. Findings include: A review of the current CMS 672 shows there are 133 residents residing in the facility. On 10/17/22 at 9:30 AM, this surveyor completed an initial tour of this facility's food storage room with V16 (Dietary Manager). There were (3) 106-ounce cans of spaghetti sauce and (1) 5 pound 10 ounce can of pizza sauce observed on the storage shelf to be deeply dented. On 10/17/22 at 9:30 AM, V16 (Dietary Manager) stated dented cans should not be accepted on delivery. V16 stated the dented cans should not have been placed on shelf to be used. V16 stated these cans should be thrown out to ensure not used for resident meals. V16 removed the dented cans from shelf and placed on a table. On 10/17/22 at 12:15 PM, this surveyor observed the 4 dented cans still in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their call light policy for 1 of 1 (R39) by not ensuring the call light within reach. Findings include: R39's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] section C (cognitive pattern), documents a score of fourteen, which indicates cognitively intact. Section G (functional status) documents limited assistance with one person physical assist for toilet use and personal hygiene. No impairment to the upper extremities. Section H (bowel continence) documents frequently incontinent. On 10/16/22 at 11:30 AM, R39 was observed in bed. R39 said, I had a bowel movement. I need assistance to be changed. I don't know where my call light is located. R39's call light was observed on the floor out of reach, near the base of R39's head board. V8 (MDS Coordinator) said, (R39's) call light should be in reach. On 10/16/22 at 4:48 PM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) said, The call light should be within reach. Answering the call light, revised 2008,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy for Advance Directives. The facility failed to put an order for a resident with a change of Advance Directives (Code Status). This deficient practice affects one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for Advance Directives. Findings Include: R1's initial facility admission was dated 1/4/22. R1's Face Sheet, documents : There is no Advanced Directives selected for this resident. R1's DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE (DNR) PRACTITIONER ODERS FOR LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT (POLST) FORM, documents R1 would like to be DNR (Do Not Resuscitate); R1's signature, dated 9/15/22, Social Service Director (V12) signature, dated 9/15/22 and Nurse Practitioner's signature, dated 9/20/22. R1's Physician Order Report for Active Orders shows there is no order for Code status stating R1 is on DNR code status. On 10/19/22 at 10:59 AM, V12 (Social Service Director) stated, We get doctor's order to become a DNR. R1 requested to change R1's code status from full code to DNR. Form was completed by me and with Nurse practitioner. Advance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their hot water policy and ensure the water temperatures in the resident room was between 105 and 115 Fahrenheit for 2 residents in the sample of 133 residents reviewed for water temperatures. Findings include: On 10/16/22 at 11:42 AM, R119 said the water is cold when the staff gives him a bed bath. On 10/18/22 at 2:02 PM, during tour to check water temperature, R113's room water temperature was noted to be 69.9 degrees Fahrenheit, shower room temp was noted to be 102.8; R119's room water temp was noted to be 104.5 degrees Fahrenheit. On 10/18/22 at 2:02 PM, V30 (Maintenance Supervisor) said the water temperature should be 106-107 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility policy no titled noted shows in-part to ensure patient room water temperature are between 105 and 115.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their transfer and discharge policy by not providing a safe discharge from the facility. This affected 1 of 3 residents (R132) reviewed for discharge and transfer. Findings include: R132 facility face sheet shows R132 has diagnosis of other seizures, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, intraspinal abscess, pressure ulcer, end stage renal disease, anemia, personal history of venous thrombus, depression, history myocardial infraction, congestive heart failure, anxiety, GERD, vertigo, osteoporosis, chronic pain, and diabetes mellitus. R132's discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 9/29/22, shows discharged , return not anticipated, discharged to community. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) ( cognitive status) is blank, cognitive skills for daily decision making is 2 moderately impaired; other behavior not directed toward others, rejection of care. Section G for functional status shows R132 needs extensive assist with bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their transfer and discharge policy and give a 30 day notice of plan to discharge to 1 resident (R132) reviewed for discharge notice in a sample of 133. Findings Include: R132 face sheets documents R132 has diagnosis of other seizures, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, intraspinal abscess, pressure ulcer, end stage renal disease, anemia, personal history of venous thrombus, depression, history myocardial infraction, congestive heart failure, anxiety, GERD, vertigo, osteoporosis, chronic pain, and diabetes mellitus. On 10/17/22 at 3:59 PM, R132 said the social worker at the facility asked her if they could search her belongings, and she signed consent for the search. R132 said when searching her belongings, the facility said they found drugs in her belongings. R132 said that's when she told them they could no longer search her things, because she knew she did not have drugs, and she did not know what they was talking about, R132 said she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflect the resident's current status for 1 resident (R99) out of 3 reviewed for special treatments and programs in a sample of 133. Findings include: On 10/17/22 3:05 PM, V14 (Minimum Data Set/MDS coordinator) stated resident assessments are completed upon admission, quarterly, and with any significant change. V14 stated she reviews the resident's medical record for hospice orders. V14 stated she also receives an updated list of all residents in facility receiving hospice care from social services. V14 stated she does not recall if R99 is currently on hospice care. R99's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 9/1/22, was reviewed with V14. V14 stated it notes R99 is receiving hospice care. R99's POS reviewed with V14. V14 stated R99's order for hospice was discontinued on 3/10/22. V14 stated she will need to complete a modification of R99's assessments to remove hospice services. On 10/17/22 3:15 PM V12 (Director of Social Services) stated she has a binder with list of all residents currently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to incliude fall interventions and the use of psychopharmacologic medications. This affects 3 residents (R2, R90, and R99) out of three residents reviewed for care plans in a sample of 133. Findings include: 1. Review of R2's medical record, dated 8/18/22, notes R2 slid out of wheelchair onto floor. Review of R2's falls care plan, dated 5/6/22, notes R2 is at risk for falls related to abnormalities of gait and mobility. Intervention identified: R2 will be protected from injury/trauma. Review of R2's medical record, dated 6/7/22, notes R2 developed a wound on right distal first toe, full thickness. There is no documentation found in R2's medical record noting a care plan was developed related to R2's right toe wound or ADLs (activities of daily living). 2. Review of R99's medical record, dated 2/18/22, notes R99 was observed lying on the floor; unwitnessed fall. Review of R99's falls care plan, dated 6/9/22, notes R99…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, coordinate, and initiate a safe discharge for a vulnerable dependent resident. This affected 1 of 3 residents (R132) reviewed for safe discharge. Findings include: R132's facility face sheet shows R132 has diagnosis of other seizures, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, intraspinal abscess, pressure ulcer, end stage renal disease, anemia, personal history of venous thrombus, depression, history myocardial infraction, congestive heart failure, anxiety, GERD, vertigo, osteoporosis, chronic pain, and diabetes mellitus. R132's discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 9/29/22, shows, discharged , return not anticipated, discharged to community, BIMS ( cognitive status) is blank, cognitive skills for daily decision making is 2 moderately impaired, other behavior not directed toward others, rejection of care. Section G for functional status shows R132 needs extensive assist with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on and off unit, dressing, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their discharge policy and supply the resident a discharge summary and or discharge records for continuity of care. This affects 1 resident (R132) reviewed for discharge summary. Findings nclude: Review of R132's care plan shows there is no plan of care noted for discharge planning. Review of R132's assessments shows there were no discharge plans noted for R132. R132's facility face sheet shows R132 has diagnosis of other seizures, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, intraspinal abscess, pressure ulcer, end stage renal disease, anemia, personal history of venous thrombus, depression, history myocardial infraction, congestive heart failure, anxiety, GERD, vertigo, osteoporosis, chronic pain, and diabetes mellitus. R132's discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 9/29/22, shows discharged , return not anticipated, discharged to community, BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) ( cognitive status) is blank, cognitive skills for daily decision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for one residents (R93) wound treatment for a diabetic heel ulcer for one of three residents reviewed for wounds. Findings include: R93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of type II diabetes, end stage renal disease and hypertension. R93 physician order, dated 10/4/22, documents: cleanse wound with normal saline. Apply calcium alginate and wrap with (gauze dressing) three times a week. R93 wound care note, dated 10/11/22, documents: diabetic wound to left heel measuring 0.5x1.2x0.1cm. Dressing treatment plan continue alginate calcium three times a week. On 10/16/22 at 11:56 AM, V10(Nurse) removed gauze dressing from R93 left heel. V10 said there was no other treatment to site. V10 said she applied gauze dressing to left heel on 10/15/22, but did not have access to any wound care supplies, and just wrapped the foot with gauze dressing.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for splint application and failed to develop interventions to reduce or prevent the decline in mobility. This affected 2 of residents (R81, R2) reviewed for range of motion. Findings include: 1. R81 Physician orde,r dated 12/15/202,1 documents: Apply left hand splint daily as tolerated. On in AM off in PM. On 10/16/22 at 11:35 AM, R81 was observed with a left contracted hand. R81's fingers were closed in a fist. R81, who was assessed to be alert and oriented, said, I am supposed to have a carrot in my hand. On 10/16/22 at 4:43 PM, V9 (Restorative Nurse) said, (R81) has a splint for his hand. We follow the doctors orders. (R81's) splint should have been in place. 2. On 10/18/22 12:20 PM, V15, PTA (Physical Therapy Assistant) stated R2 is not currently receiving skilled therapy. V15 stated R2 was discharged from skilled therapy because R2 had plateaued in therapy. V15 stated skilled therapy provides recommendations in writing to restorative therapy, as well as a copy is given to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their Oxygen Administration Policy by not administering oxygen rate as ordered by the physician. This affects one resident (R95) out of three residents reviewed for Respiratory Program. Findings Include: 1. R95's physician order includes Oxygen order with a start date of 3/12/22 reads: Oxygen: Trach Rate 6 liters per minute. Humidity 35%. Continuous: and Oxygen: Change tubing and mask weekly and PRN (as needed) (Label). On 10/16/22 at 10:45 AM, R95 was in bed. There was an Oxygen concentrator in room reading 5 liters per minute. On 10/16/22 at 10:50 AM, confirmed with V26 (Nurse) Oxygen level for R95 was at 5 liters per minute. V26 stated R95 was supposed to be on 6 liters per minute, as ordered by the attending physician. V26 observed adjusting oxygen concentrator from 5 liters per minute to 6 liters per minute. 2. R29's physician orders includes Oxygen order with a start date of 1/4/22 reads: Oxygen: Nasal Cannula, Rate Oxygen 3 liters per minute; And Oxygen: change tubing and mask weekly and PRN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reconcile controlled medication for 3 of 3 (R78, R79 and R94) reviewed for labeling and storage. Findings Include: On 10/17/22 at 3:57PM, V24 (nurse), said, I gave (R79's) lorazepam 1mg tablet by mouth at 2pm. I forgot to sign the medication out of the controlled drug receipt form. Its twenty-five pills in (R79's) bingo pack. (R79's) controlled drug form documents twenty-six pills left. The amount written on the controlled drug receipt form and the actual pills in the bingo card should be the same number. On 10/17/22 at 4:03 PM, during medication cart review with V24, R78 was observed with twenty pills of clonazepam 0.5mg in the bingo card. R78's controlled drug receipt form documents nineteen pills left. R94 was observed with five pills of lorazepam 0.5mg pills in the bingo card. R94's controlled drug form document six pill left. On 10/17/22 at 4:25 PM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) said, Pills should be signed out as given. The controlled drug receipt should match the same number of bills in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, this facility failed to obtain informed consent noting diagnosis or reason for medication, dosage, frequency, side effects, and benefits/risks prior to initiating psychotropic medication usage and monitor the effectiveness or adverse consequences of psychotropic medications by monitoring AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) every 6 months. This affected 1 of 4 residents (R94) reviewed for psychotropic medication usage in a sample 133 Findings include: Review of R94's medical record notes R94 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and schizophrenia. On 10/17/22 3:20 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated psychotropic medication consents are obtained by the nurse prior to the initiation of any psychotropic medications. V2 stated the completed consents are uploaded into the resident's electronic medical record. On 10/18/22 at 2:00 PM, V19 (nurse supervisor) stated psychotropic medication consents are obtained from the family or resident, if alert enough, prior to administering psychotropic medications. V19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a plan in place for a resident to recieve dental services. This affected 1 resident (R10) reviewed for dental services in a sample of 133. Findings include: On 10/16/22 at 11:01 AM, R49 was observed with broken lower bottom teeth, R49 said she has not seen the dentist. R49 said she would like to see the dentist. On 10/18/22 at 12:29 PM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) said R49 has not seen the dentist and R49 is on the list to see the dentist. Request was made to review the facility dental list. V3 presented with a document, dated 10/18/22, showing the facility intends to see patients including R49, as monthly visits will be scheduled via our clinical scheduling department, and relayed to (facility) appointed dental contact people in social service. During this survey, the facility did not present any documentation or a schedule showing a date R59 is scheduled to see the dentist. R49 census shows R49 was admitted to facility on 1/28/2021. On 10/19/22 at 5:00 PM, V31 (Resident Liaison) said she is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow food preference of a resident. This affects one resident (R6) out of three residents reviewed for dietary services. Findings Include: On 10/16/22 at 12:30 PM, R6's lunch tray was served. R6's lunch tray had broccoli on R6's plate. R6 stated, They always give me broccoli, green beans or cauliflower with my meals, and it says on my diet card No Broccoli I swear, the staff don't read my diet card. On 10/16/22 at 12:32 PM, dietary ticket on R6's lunch tray had R6's name, room number, and diet orders written on it. Also written in the bottom portion of the dietary ticket, *No Broccoli-Cauliflower-Green Beans*. On 10/18/22 at 1:40 PM, V16 (Dietary Supervisor) stated, Dietary tickets will show resident's food preferences. Dietary ticket is placed on the meal tray of each residents for each meal. During tray line food preparation in the kitchen, dietary aide will review the dietary ticket prior to setting the meal tray. Dietary aide needs to follow what is written on the dietary ticket. A couple of dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed maintain an effective infection control practice by not following their Equipment Change Schedule Policy for Oxygen equipment, isolation policy, and glucometer cleaning policy. This affected 4 residents (R95, R29,R126, R93) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 133. Findings Include: 1. R95's physician order reports for active orders reviewed. Oxygen order, with a start date of 3/12/22 reads: Oxygen: Trach Rate 6 liters per minute. Humidity 35%. Continuous: and Oxygen: Change tubing and mask weekly and PRN (as needed) (Label). On 10/16/22 at 10:45 AM, R95 was in bed. Oxygen concentrator was in room. Oxygen water bottle (bubbler) connected to the oxygen concentrator machine does not have date written on it. Oxygen tubing connected to the bubbler to trach set up for R95 shows a written date of 9/28/22. On 10/16/22 at 10:50 AM, confirmed with V26 (Nurse) the date written on oxygen tubing was 9/28/22. 2. R29's physician order reports for active orders reviewed. Oxygen order, with a start date of 1/4/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-01-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that posted nursing staffing information was complete and accurate. This failure has the potential to affect all 131 residents residing at the facility.Findings include:On 1/12/2026, upon entrance to the facility at 9:00AM, surveyor observed a daily staffing posting on a board behind the reception desk. Upon review of the posting, surveyor observed only the column for the number of staff was completed. The second column, actual hours worked and the 3rd column, total hours were left vacant. The same postings were observed behind the reception desk on 1/13/2026 and 1/14/2026.On 1/14/2026 around 2:30PM, surveyor asked the receptionist who is responsible for the staff posting, and she said the staffing coordinator is responsible. She brings it down every day, and she just puts it in a drawer when a new one is brought down the following day.On 1/14/2026 at 4:18PM, V12 (Staffing Coordinator) said she is in charge of the nursing staff posing and has been doing it since she started working at the facility in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-10-19 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a facility assessment for the facility. This has the potential to affect all 133 residents at the facility. Findings include: A review of the current CMS 672 shows there are 133 residents residing in the facility. On 10/18/22 2:30 PM , V1(Administrator) reviewed documents presented for facility assessment on 10/16/22. V1 confirmed the documents reviewed were an outline for how to complete facility assessment and not the facility's current assessment. On 10/18/22 at 3:15 PM, V1(Administrator) presented facility assessment, dated 2018, with no current updates. On 10/19/22 at 9:14 AM, V1 (Administrator) said they are supposed to have a facility assessment. Facility assessment tool undated documents: Nursing facilities will conduct, document and annually review a facility-wide assessment, which includes both their resident population and the resources the facility needs to care for their residents. The intent of the facility assessment is for the facility to evaluate its resident population and identify the resources…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$413,568 in federal fines across 9 penalties. 6 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $45,396 — penalty dated 2025-09-19
- $51,714 — penalty dated 2025-06-04
- $11,128 — penalty dated 2024-12-19
- $44,512 — penalty dated 2024-11-14
- $31,993 — penalty dated 2024-10-11
- $14,283 — penalty dated 2024-08-06
- $16,322 — penalty dated 2024-08-06
- $83,600 — penalty dated 2024-03-01
- $114,620 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-01-29 for 1 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-26 for 12 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-06 for 3 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-04 for 8 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-26 for 34 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-26 for 74 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEINFELD, EFRIAM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| ALIYA OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| OPTIMUMBANK | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| ABRAM, JULIET | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| NAGUBADI, SANDHYA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146132. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.