Joliet Living & Rehab Center
2230 McDonough, Joliet, IL 60436 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (815) 729-3801 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 0.6% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.2% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 90.5% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.6% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.1% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.6% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 72.6% | 21.7% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 91.8 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.35 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a respectful and dignified manner when they searched the residents' room without them present. This failure applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for resident rights. The findings include:R1 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses history of paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder, who was admitted to the facility June 1, 2023. On April 28, 2026 at 10:42 AM, R1 said his room was searched randomly and he was not present during the search, nor did he give permission for his room to be searched. R1 said during this inspection, his jacket was lying on his bed, and they searched his jacket pocket. Grievance form, dated April 20, 2026, showed R1 reported concerns regarding having his room searched without him being present. On April 28, 2026 at 12:08 PM, V3 (Psychosocial Rehabilitation Services Coordinator) said she searched R1's room on April 20, 2026, as a random room check. V3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents the right to private visits when the facility rules for resident visitation changed preventing private room visits. This applies to 9 of 9 (R1, R19, R22, R23, R24, R25, R20, R6, R10) reviewed for residents' rights. The findings include:The facility's Resident Rights for people in Long-Term Care facilities showed the following: You have the right to private visits, unless your doctor has ordered limited visits for medical reasons. The facility's House Rules and Behavior Expectations agreement implemented on January 23, 2026, showed the following: 14 Residents are prohibited from going onto another unit/floor that he or she does not reside on. If you would like to visit with a co-resident, please use the dining room.1.On February 2, 2026, at 10:14 AM, R1 stated during a meeting a couple weeks ago, the facility took away her right to have friends and her boyfriend in her room. R1 stated they told everyone that they cannot have another resident in their room unless the other resident lives on the same wing of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent residents from verbal abuse from a staff member. This failure apples to 3 of 7 residents (R1, R2, and R7) reviewed for abuse from a sample of 7. The findings include:An Abuse Investigation report shows V3 (Psychosocial Services Rehabilitation Coordinator/Assistant) was hired by the facility 09/17/2025. On 11/05/2025, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported to the administrator R1 informed her V3 was verbally abusive to him by calling him a dick on 10/31/2025, and also during this time, V4 received a report V3 was observed mocking R2 during smoke break; upon further investigation, R1 and V3 were interviewed and confirmed the allegations, and V3 was terminated by the facility as a result.On November 17, 2025 at 3:01 PM, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) said she is the Resident's Ambassador and takes reports regarding negative staff or resident to resident interaction. V4 said R1 reported to her he didn't like V3 (Psychosocial Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report incidents and allegations of abuse and mistreatment of residents. This failure apples to 3 of 7 residents (R1, R2, and R7) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 7 residents. The findings include:R1 is a [AGE] year-old male with a diagnoses history of Bipolar Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Suicidal Ideations who was admitted to the facility 01/20/2016. On November 17, 2025 at 11:34 AM, R1 said V3 (Psychosocial Rehabilitation Services Aide) told him You're a dick, when R1 tried to apologize to V3 for a miscommunication from the day prior. R1 said he originally thought V3 was joking, however, when R1 looked at V3 and saw V3 wasn't laughing, he realized V3 wasn't joking. R1 said he reported the incident to V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) who then informed V1 (Administrator). R1 said V3 has a military background and went on to question him about his military clothing, such as asking why R1 was wearing army clothing if he was in the Navy. R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate incidents and allegations of abuse and mistreatment of residents. This failure apples to 3 of 7 residents (R1, R2, and R7) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 7 residents. The findings include:R1 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses history of Bipolar Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Suicidal Ideations, who was admitted to the facility 01/20/2016. On November 17, 2025 at 11:34 AM, R1 said V3 (Psychosocial Rehabilitation Services Aide) told him You're a dick, when R1 tried to apologize to V3 for a miscommunication from the day prior. R1 said he originally thought V3 was joking, however, when R1 looked at V3 and saw V3 wasn't laughing, he realized V3 wasn't joking. R1 said he reported the incident to V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant), who then informed V1 (Administrator). R1 said V3 has a military background and went on to question him about his military clothing, such as asking why R1 was wearing army clothing if he was in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect two residents from abuse by not implementing interventions regarding repeated behavioral concern and a resident complaint. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 10. The finding includes: According to the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), R1 is a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses including, but not limited to, mood disorder, depression, anxiety, morbid obesity, and chronic pain. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed R1 is cognitively intact and exhibits verbally threatening behaviors on an almost daily basis. R1 also demonstrated depressive moods. The EMR of R2 showed R2 is a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD), anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and morbid obesity. The MDS, dated [DATE], showed R2 is cognitively intact and experiences depressive moods. The facility incident report, dated May 28, 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their water management program and identify areas where control measures are needed and assess how much of a risk those hazardous conditions pose. This affects all 88 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)-671 Long Term Care Facility application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated May 12, 2025, showed the total census of 88 residents. The facility's Water Management program stated the facility will do the following: 1. identify building water systems for which Legionella control measures are needed. 2. Assess how much risk the hazardous conditions in those water systems pose. On May 14, 2025 at 1:25 PM, it was requested from V1 (Administrator),V6 (Maintenance Director), V15 (Regional Maintenance) all information regarding their water management plan, Legionella, and other waterborne pathogens plan, their water management assessment, and any evidence of measures used to prevent Legionella. On May 14, 2025 3:32 PM, V1, V6, and V15 acknowledged and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to have window screens in resident's rooms. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R30, R66, R74, R77 and R80) in the sample 18. The findings include: 1.R80's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated March 21, 2025, showed R80 was cognitively intact. On May 13, 2025 at 9:11 AM, R80 stated the window in her room does not have a screen. On checking R80's window in her room, it did not have a screen. The window was partially (about 4 inches) opened on the right side. R80 stated she had slid the inner panel sideways as far as it would go. A wooden block at the left side was inside the ledge of the window that prevented sliding the panel to open the window further. R80 stated V6 (Maintenance Director) applied the wooden block to prevent residents from opening the window completely and jumping out. R80 stated when V6 applied the wooden block on April 23, 2025, she had told him about the missing screen, and he did nothing about it. R80 remarked it is warm at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents or residents' representatives their written bed hold and return policy prior to hospitalization. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R23, R38, R72, R78) reviewed for hospitalizations in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R38 has multiple medical diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, hypothyroidism, unspecified, constipation, unspecified, extrapyramidal and movement disorder, unspecified, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Ogilvie syndrome, based on the face sheet. Progress notes from November 2024 to present shows that R38 was sent to the hospital multiple times for different reasons. On November 17, 2024, he was sent to the hospital for acute left lateral fracture of the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th rib, with 5% pneumothorax. On December 20, 2024, he was sent for abnormal result of KUB (Kidney, Ureter, Bladder) test, and on January 2, 2025, he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse. This applies to 2 of 2 (R9 and R17) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 18. The findings include: R9's face sheet shows R9 is 59 years-old, and has multiple diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia. R9's most recent Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) assessment indicates R9 is cognitively intact. R17's face sheet shows he is 62 years-old, and has multiple medical diagnoses including unspecified schizophrenia, and generalized anxiety disorder, with a MDS assessment indicating moderately impaired cognition. R17's active care plan shows R17 has history of aggressive behavior and has exhibited verbally/physically abusive behavior related/manifested by being challenged by mental illness, ineffective coping mechanisms, poor verbal skills and inability to express self in more appropriate language. Incident report, dated May 1, 2025, at approximately 3:30 PM, documents while watching a movie in the dining/day room, V4 (Psychiatric Rehab Service Director/PRSD) witnessed R17 reaching out and touching R9's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services to residents with SMI (severe mental illness). This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R76 and R81) reviewed for behavioral health services in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder and attention deficient hyperactivity disorder, based on the face sheet. R76 was under [AGE] years old. R76's annual MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated February 10, 2025, showed R76 is cognitively intact. The MDS showed the resident has no functional impairments in range of motion. Further review of the MDS showed R76 requires supervision with all his ADLs (activities of daily living). The same MDS showed R76's primary SMI (Serious Mental Illness) diagnosis is schizophrenia, and the resident is on antipsychotic medication. R76's PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) Level II, dated September 11, 2024, showed R76 needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a residents room in good repair. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for physical environment. The findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, obesity, and tinea unguium. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 02/10/25, showed R1 was cognitively intact. R1's Progress Note, dated 02/13/24 at 9:52 AM, showed, It was brought to writers attention that there was a hole in the wall by the resident's bed. Writer approached resident about the said behavior and incident and was educated that vandalizing facility property is not acceptable and will be held accountable. On 04/23/25 at 2:00 PM, R1 was in his room, sitting on the side of the bed. R1 was alert and oriented x3. R1 had a large piece of plywood on the wall next his bed. R1 stated he accidentally kicked the wall a year ago while he was sleeping. R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's rights to be free of sexual and physical abuse. This applies to 3 of 4 residents (R2, R3, and R4) reviewed for sexual and physical abuse. The findings include: R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included post-traumatic stress disorder, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, and borderline personality disorder. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 02/13/25, showed R2 was cognitively intact. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, insomnia, psychoactive substance use, depression, and seizures. R3 was discharged from the facility on 04/07/25. R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included primary insomnia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, cannabis use. R4's MDS, dated [DATE], showed R4 was cognitively intact. The facility's 04/05/25 Report to IDPH…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have podiatry services provide foot care and treatment. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for podiatry services. The findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, obesity, and tinea unguium. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 02/10/25, showed R1 was cognitively intact. The same MDS showed R1 required supervision or touching assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living). On 04/23/25 at 2:00 PM, R1 was wearing black slippers. R1's toenails on his left foot were long, black, and curled in a downward position. R1's toenails on his right foot were long. R1 stated the last time he had his toenails clipped by the podiatrist was six months ago. R1 stated he told the program manager that he needed his toenails clipped. R1 stated he was on the list to see the podiatrist in March. R1 stated the podiatrist came…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect a resident's right to receive a second cup of coffee, as desired by the resident. This applies to 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 8. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3 has multiple diagnoses including, cocaine dependence with cocaine-induced anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), cardiac arrhythmia, back pain, and suicidal ideations. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated March 5, 2025, shows R3 is cognitively intact, and requires supervision with all ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R3 is always continent of bowel and bladder. On March 27, 2025 at 10:50 AM, R3 was sitting up in bed in his room. R3 said on March 25, 2025, he was in the dining room and wanted a second cup of coffee. R3 said, I went up to [V3] (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) and asked for a second cup of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse. This applies to 3 of 6 residents (R3, R4, and R7) reviewed for physical assault in the sample of 8. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3 has multiple diagnoses including, cocaine dependence with cocaine-induced anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), cardiac arrhythmia, back pain, and suicidal ideations. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated March 5, 2025, shows R3 is cognitively intact, and requires supervision with all ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R3 is always continent of bowel and bladder. The EMR shows R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR continues to show R4 was sent to the local hospital on March 26, 2025, and has not returned to the facility. R4 has multiple diagnoses including bipolar type schizoaffective disorder, heart disease, nicotine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow Nurse Practitioner's orders to obtain a laboratory test. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for delay of care in the sample of 8. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR continues to show R1 was sent to the local hospital on September 26, 2024 and diagnosed with an elevated bilirubin and low sodium level. R1 did not return to the facility. R1 had multiple diagnoses including bipolar type schizoaffective disorder, UTI (Urinary Tract Infection), abnormal gait, muscle weakness, left ulna fracture, insomnia, encephalopathy, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), heart failure, pulmonary edema, heart disease, diabetes, myocardial infarction, and rheumatoid arthritis. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated September 6, 2024, shows R1 was cognitively intact, required setup assistance with eating, oral hygiene, showering, personal hygiene, and bed mobility, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a resident to resident physical abuse altercation. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for physical abuse in the sample of 6. The findings include: Facility reported incident dated October 13, 2024 included as follows: R1 reported to V1 (Administrator) at 1:00 PM, that on October 13, 2024 at 9:30 AM, when R1 entered the bathroom while R2 was using it, R2 became upset and slapped R1. R1 and R2 are not roommates but share the same bathroom. R1 denied any pain or discomfort and stated that it does not hurt. Investigations initiated .Conclusions for this investigation included that facility believes that R2 had no intention to abuse R1 and was responding to internal stimuli and was surprised and upset by R1's reaction to his behaviors. R1 has diagnoses of Schizophrenia and does have delusional thoughts and ideations as well as maladaptive behaviors R1's face sheet included diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain cleanliness in the food preparation area and equipment storage. This applies to all residents in the facility for a total 92 residents. The findings include: On 06/11/2024 9:54 AM, during initial kitchen tour with V4 (Dietary Manager), two staff were preparing food for the lunch meal and snack. V5 (Cook) was wearing a hair restraint, with hair dangling to their earlobe on both sides of the face. While wearing gloves, V5 was chopping red peppers and onions. Without removing gloves, V5 went to the cooler to retrieve additional vegetables and resumed chopping. V5 did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene before she resumed chopping vegetables. V6 (Dietary Aide) was wearing a hair restraint with hair dangling to their earlobe on both sides of the face while preparing peanut butter jelly sandwiches. An air vent on the ceiling in between the food preparation area was covered with black dust build up. The floor behind the shelving, which was holding the plates, bowls, plastic storage bins, stainless…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment. This applies to 8 residents (R34, R72, R53, R193, R75, R59, R71, and R42) reviewed for homelike environment in a sample of 26 residents. The findings include: 1. R34's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 3/4/24, shows his cognition is intact. On 6/11/24 at 10:48 AM, R34 said his bathroom door gets stuck when he is trying to open or close it, and he feels like he is going to throw his back out trying to open it. R34 said when he is in the bathroom it is even worse trying to open it; he has to kick the bottom of the door to get it to open. R34 then demonstrated opening the door, and he had to pull hard on the knob, rocking his body back and forth, 3-4 times to get the door to open, and when it finally did open, it scraped against the floor making a loud noise. R34 said he mentioned the door needing to be repaired to V9 (Maintenance Director) 3-4 months ago, and V9 told him he would have to take…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to invite 4 residents (R55, R65, R76 and R31) to their care plan meetings that were reviewed for care plans, in a sample of 26 Findings include: 1. On 06/11/24 at 2:31 PM, R55, who's cognition is intact, said he had never been invited or attended a care plan meeting. On 6/13/24 at 1:51 PM, R55's electronic health record showed no documentation for any care plan meeting or invitation to any care plan meetings. 2. On 06/11/24 at 11:23 AM, R65, who's cognition is intact, said he has never attended a care plan meeting. On 6/13/24 at 1:51 PM, R65's electronic health record showed no documentation for any care plan meeting or invitation to any care plan meetings. 3. On 06/11/24 12:43 PM, R76, who's cognition is intact, said he has never attended a care plan meeting. On 06/13/24 at 1:58 PM, R76' electronic health records did not show any documentation for any care plan meetings or invitations to any care plan meetings. On 06/13/24 at 3:01 PM, V1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. 06/12/24 at 10:13 AM, R17, who's cognition is intact, said during smoking breaks the staff will sometimes come out, and sometimes the staff stays inside. R17 said the residents light their own cigarettes. R17 said the staff leaves the lighter outside, and sometimes the lighter will come up missing, because no one is watching. R17 said the staff hardly ever gets the lighter back. 3. On 06/11/24 10:31 AM, R59, who's cognition is intact, said during smoking breaks, the staff watch from the inside, and they don't come outside at all. R59 said sometimes it is one staff monitoring, and sometimes it is 2 staff, but nobody goes outside to monitor when the residents are smoking. On 06/12/24 3:29 PM, V3 (Psych Services Rehab Director) said, The facility is short staffed, and they don't have two staff to monitor during smoking breaks. The facility's lighter will come up missing when they don't have staff to monitor during smoking breaks outside. On 06/13/24 11:18 AM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said staff are to go…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain dignity and privacy for 2 residents (R17 & R71) in a sample of 26. Findings include: 1. On 06/12/24 at 10:13 AM, R17 was in her room. R17, who's cognition is intact, said she has anxiety and panic attacks, and staff will knock on her door and just walk in. R17 said the staff will not wait for her to give them permission to come in before they enter. R17 said this makes her feel like she is not respected, and she feels like she is being invaded. At 10:25 AM, V13, CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) knocked on the door while opening it, entered the room and said, room check. V13 entered the room without waiting for permission to enter. 2. On 06/12/24 at 09:33 AM, R71 was in her room and R71, who's cognition is intact said, Some staff will knock and come in without getting permission to come in, and some don't even knock, especially at night so you don't even have time to cover up. R71 said many of the staff have seen her naked. At 09:48 AM, V12 (Nurse) came in to R71's room to give her her medication and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper documentation for Advanced Directives for 3 residents (R76, R293, and R243) in a sample of 26. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 12:00 PM, R76's health records were reviewed. The facility's book titled Advanced Directives showed R76 was to receive CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) full treatment. The document was signed on [DATE]. R76's electronic record showed his code status as DNR (do not resuscitate). R76's [DATE] physician's orders showed Do Not Attempt Resuscitation/DNR. On [DATE] at 11:25 AM, V2, DON (Director of Nursing), said the staff will use the resident's electronic health record to determine treatment when a resident goes into cardiac arrest or is found unconscious. V2 said if the electronic health record shows R76 is a DNR, and the Advanced Directives book shows R76 is a full code, the staff will not be giving him CPR. V2 said this would be against R76's wishes. The facility's Advance Directives policy, dated 3/2021,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physicians' orders for 1 resident (R71), and failed to monitor 1 diabetic resident's blood glucose levels (R293) in a sample of 26. Findings include: 1. R71's electronic health records showed diagnoses including spinal stenosis, muscle weakness, and perforation of intestines. R71's 5/17/24 physician orders showed Tylenol oral tablet (acetaminophen) 1000 milligrams every four hours as needed for pain. On 06/12/24 at 9:48 AM, R71 was in her room and V12 (Nurse) gave R71 her morning medications. R71 looked at all of the medications, and informed V12 she had given her two 325mg of Tylenol instead of two 500mg of Tylenol that was ordered. V12 said she only had the 325mg of Tylenol on her cart. V12 said, I just substituted the 325mg for the 500mg. I gave 650mg instead of the 1000mg. I did not have the 1000 in the cart and I am allowed to do that. V12 then said, I am going to get her the 1000 mg now because she asked for it. R71 said,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update the EMR (Electronic Medical Record) to include R243's medical diagnoses. Findings include: R243 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During review of R243's medical record, no diagnoses were noted listed in the EMR. On 6/13/24 at 12:08 PM, V2, DON (Director of Nursing), reviewed R243's EMR and did not find his diagnoses. V2 stated the admitting nurse is responsible for entering the residents' diagnoses list and the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator should have reviewed them. The resident's diagnosis list is obtained from the discharge summary or admission packet received from the hospital. If the resident needed to be sent out, we would not have a diagnoses list to provide for the transfer. The facility did not provide a policy or procedure guide for resident record updating.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure milk and cottage cheese were stored and served at temperatures to prevent potential food- borne illnesses. This applies to 96 of 99 residents in the building. Findings include: On 9/6/23 at 3:05 PM, V3 (Dietary Manager) stated facility census is 99 residents, out of which three residents do not drink milk. 1. On 9/6/23 at 11:15 AM, V3 (Dietary Manager) stated, Milk should be stored at 41° F (degrees Fahrenheit) or less. On 9/6/23 at 11:30 AM, the thermometer inside the milk refrigerator showed a temperature of 52° F. On 9/6/23 at 11:31 AM, a carton of milk from the refrigerator was checked with a 'stick' thermometer, and it showed 50° F. On 9/6/23 at 12:45 PM, the thermometer inside the milk refrigerator showed a temperature of 54° F. On 9/6/23 at 12:46 PM, a carton of milk from the refrigerator was checked with a stick thermometer and it showed 56° F. On 9/6/23 at 2:50 PM, the thermometer inside the milk refrigerator showed a temperature of 60° F. On 9/6/23 at 2:55 PM, three cartons of milk from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide maintenance services to ensure resident's closet and toilet seats were in good repair. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R10, R12, R47, R68, R56) reviewed for environment in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. On 07/10/23 at 10:30 AM, R10 stated, My toilet seat slides off. I told the man in Maintenance about it. It has been about a month. The person from Corporate said that it needs to have a back. The toilet seat was noted to have no back rest, and the seat was loosely hinged at the back. R10 demonstrated how it moved from side to side. R10 shared the same bathroom and toilet with roommate R12, and with the adjacent room that housed R56 and R68. On 07/10/23 at 3:55 PM, V5 (Maintenance Director) stated, About 3 weeks ago, R10 told me that the toilet seat was loose, and a work order was made but I did not think that the back was 100% necessary, so it was not done. Facility Maintenance Worksheet showed a work order was made on 6/27/23 for loose toilet seat. On 07/12/23 at 1:47 PM, V1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and date medications after opening, failed to monitor for expiration dates, and failed to remove expired medication from the medication carts. This applies to 7 of 7 residents (R3, R11, R22, R41, R57, R63 and R73) reviewed for labeling and storage of medications. The findings include: On 07/11/23 at 3:35 PM, the facility's two medication carts and one storage cart were inspected with V4, V12, and V16 (all Nurses). The following medications were in the medication carts and observed as follows: 1. R63's Insulin Lispro was open and not dated. Per the facility pharmacy, Insulin Lispro should be discarded 28 days after opening. 2. R11's Combivent Respimat 20-100mcg, open and not dated, and per pharmacy Combivent Respimat should be discard 3 months after first use. Humalog Insulin Lispro opened on 5/4/23 with instructions to discard 28 days after opening, which would have been 6/1/2023. 3. R57's Fluticasone Salmeterol Aer. 100/50, open and not dated. 4. R22's Novolin R insulin opened on 5/18/23, discard after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve roast beef portion size as shown on menu spreadsheet. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R3, R8, R49, R58, R75) observed for dining in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 07/11/23 at 12:35 PM, during lunch meal service, most of the residents observed were noted to receive one small slice of roast beef with gravy, along with sides of vegetables and potatoes. A few residents received two slices of roast beef. All residents served were on regular diet consistency. V11 (Cook), who was serving the meal, stated residents on regular diet only receive one slice of roast beef, and he gives two pieces if the meat slice was too small. R3, R8, R49, R58 and R75 were noted to receive only one small slice of roast beef. V8 (Dietary Manager) who was in the vicinity, stated each slice should weigh 2 oz (ounces). On request, V8 weighed one slice of the roast beef that was taken from the tray line steam table, and the weight showed around 1.1 oz. Facility menu spreadsheet for Spring Summer (week 4) for Tuesday July…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0825 — patternProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide mental health rehabilitation services to residents identified with SMI (Severe Mental Illness). This applies to 5 of 8 residents (R17, R29, R59, R62 and R63) reviewed for mental health rehabilitative services in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R17 was [AGE] years old. R17 had multiple diagnoses which included, depressive type schizoaffective disorder and generalized anxiety disorder, based on the face sheet. R17's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 05/15/23, showed the resident is cognitively intact. The MDS showed R17 required extensive assistance from the staff with dressing and bathing, limited assistance from the staff with toilet use and personal hygiene, while the rest of his ADLs (activities of daily living) were performed with staff supervision. The same MDS showed R17's primary SMI (severe mental illness) diagnosis was schizoaffective disorder. R17 had an active care plan, initiated on 01/10/23, showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for code status and failed to properly complete a State of Illinois POLST (Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form and place a copy in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). This applies to 2 of 18 residents (R78 and R80) reviewed for advance directives from the total sample of 18. Findings include: 1. R78's admission Record documented an original admission date of [DATE], and diagnoses including but not limited to: schizoaffective disorder, hepatic encephalopathy, generalized epilepsy, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. R78's [DATE] BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) determined a score of 15, indicating R78's cognition is intact. R78's POS (Physician's Order Summary) did not have a physician's order for R78's code status. In addition, the POLST form was not uploaded into the EMR, and the Advanced Directive portion of the face sheet was blank and not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with identified mental disorder had a level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation to determine appropriate setting and specialized services for the resident's needs. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R17) reviewed for PASARR in the sample of 18. The findings include: R17 was [AGE] years old. R17 had multiple diagnoses which included: depressive type schizoaffective disorder and generalized anxiety disorder, based on the face sheet. R17's State Interagency Certification of Screening Results, dated 07/15/04, indicated nursing facility services were appropriate. R17's OBRA-1 (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) initial screen, dated 07/15/04, indicated the resident had diagnosis of mental illness, had history of psychiatric hospitalization, and history of outpatient mental health services. R17's records showed no PASARR Level II notice of Determination to evaluate the appropriate setting for the resident and to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement hospital discharge physician orders for a neurology referral for R78. This applies to 1 resident (R78) out of 18 sampled residents. Findings include: R78's admission Record documented diagnoses including but not limited to: generalized epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, intractable, with status epilepticus and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. R78's 6/28/23 BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) determined a score of 15, indicating R78's cognition is intact. R78 was noted with a hospital stay for Seizure Disorder 5/27/2023 to 5/29/2023. R78's Hospital Discharge Instructions from this hospital admission document to follow up with V18 (Neurologist) in 2 weeks. V15 (Physician/NP -Nurse Practitioner) progress note documents on 6/6/2023, This is a [AGE] year-old male with uncontrolled seizure activity, multiple hospitalizations .Please have patient f/u (follow-up) with Neurology .A/P (Assessment and Plan): Recurrent hospitalization, seizure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medications were given as prescribed. There were 25 medication opportunities, with 2 errors resulting to 8% medication error rate. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R33) reviewed for medication administration. The finding include: On 07/11/23 at 9:23 AM, V2 (Nurse) administered multiple medications to R33, which included one tablet or capsule of each of the following medications: Escitalopram 10 milligrams (mg), Atorvastatin 20 mg, Lisinopril 5 mg Metformin 850 mg, Metoprolol 50 mg, Tradjenta 5 mg, Valacyclovir 1 gram, Loratadine 10 mg, Zinc Oxide 50 mg, and Fish oil 1000 mg. Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated July 2023, shows the medications above was signed as proof it was given as prescribed. However, the order for the Escitalopram was to give R33 one and a half tablets, which was equivalent to 15 mg. There was also an order for Aspirin 81 mg, which was not given but was signed by V2. On 07/11/23 at 3:23 PM, V2 stated she did not give additional medication to R33 after surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nourishment as ordered by a Physician and/or recommended by Dietitian. This apples to 2 of 2 residents (R7, R14) reviewed for dining in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R7's face sheet included diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications. Dietician Nutrition/Dietary Note, dated 7/7/2023, included R7's diet included magic cup two times daily, whole milk with all meals. The same note included R7 had fair to good appetite, and diet and supplements remain appropriate. The note also included weight stability or additional, gradual weight gain may be beneficial and to continue present management. On 07/10/23 12:42 PM, during the lunch meal service, R7's diet card showed magic cup [fortified ice cream] and whole milk. R7 received whole milk, but did not receive magic cup. V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant), who was at the tray service line passing out the meal trays, stated, They might not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who refused immunizations sign a declination record to show they were both educated and refused the vaccine, and then secure the signed document in the resident's medical record in digital or paper form. This affected 3 of 8 residents (R51, R69, R78) reviewed for immunizations. The findings include: 1. R51's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessmen,t dated 6/7/23, showed he was cognitively intact. The facility provided their log Immunization Report, dated July 10, 2023, which showed R51 refused the influenza vaccine. No other information was provided by the facility to confirm R51's refusal of the influenza vaccine on a signature page, or the date the vaccine was refused. 2. R69's most recent MDS assessment, dated 6/2/23, showed she was cognitively intact. The facility's log Immunization Report, dated July 10, 2023, showed R69 refused the pneumovax vaccine. No other information was provided by the facility to confirm R69's refusal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in IL
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 14E247. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.