Miller Health Care Center
1601 Butterfield Trail, Kankakee, IL 60901 · Non profit - Corporation · 160 certified beds · (815) 936-6500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $189,285 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-17)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 28.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.9% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 31.3% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.3% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 41.2% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.7% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.4% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.8% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.4% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.0% | 63.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.5% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 26.4% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.37 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.51 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 385 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 149 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.2%CMS range 51.9–61.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 8.3–13.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 4.7–8.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 101.5 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-02-10 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident after CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) was unable to obtain resident's blood pressure or heart rate and failed to document resident's code status in the medical record.This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] around 6:30 AM when V33 (Agency RN) did not assess R18 after V35 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) notified V33 that she was unable to obtain a blood pressure or heart rate on R18. Around 7:45 AM, V33 (Agency RN) found R18 unresponsive and left R18 to find V16 (RN/Registered Nurse). V16 said V33 told her she thought R18 expired and R18 was DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). Around 8:00AM, R18 was found unresponsive by V41 (Respiratory Therapist) and V3 (LPN/ Acting ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) and CPR (Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation) was initiated. 911 was called at 8:33 AM by V42 (Dietary Aide/CNA). Per ambulance run report, Paramedics arrived on scene at 8:38 AM and resuscitative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent the development and worsening of skin breakdown. This failure resulted in two residents developing pressure ulcer (also known as a bedsore or pressure wound is an injury to the skin and the tissue below the skin that are due to pressure on the skin for an extended period). This applies to 2 residents, R1 and R2 reviewed for facility acquired pressure ulcers in a sample of 8.Findings include:1.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include disease of the spinal cord, cervical radiculopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure, pneumonia, morbid obesity, muscle wasting and atrophy, major depressive disorder, and diaper dermatitis. R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) documents she was sent to the local emergency room for rectal bleeding on 03/04/26.On 04/14/26 at 9:20 AM, V18 Family Member stated R1 developed multiple bedsores while in the facility because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and notify the provider of changes in a resident's condition after fall incident with injuries and pain for R2 and R6. This resulted in a delay of treatment for R2 and R6 for pain and a fracture from a fall incident. The facility failed to notify the provider of R4's change of condition that included vomiting blood and black tarry stools that resulted in the need for hospitalization and blood transfusions. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R2, R4, and R6) reviewed for resident injury and improper nursing. The findings include: 1. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included mesothelioma, peripheral vascular disease, neoplasm-related pain, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, osteoarthritis, and periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right hip joint per the EMR (Electronic Medical Record). R2's Progress Note, Late Entry, created on 06/02/24 at 2:25 PM, effective date of 05/29/24 at 2:12 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement fall precautions for a high fall risk resident admitted with a history of fall and left hip fracture.This failure resulted in R5's fall in the facility on 12/25/25, transfer to the hospital, and diagnosis of right hip fracture.This applies to 1 resident (R5) reviewed for falls with injury in a sample of 3.The findings include:R5's Face sheet shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnosis of fracture of left pubis. R5's other diagnoses include: unsteadiness on feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, dizziness, osteoarthritis, and falls.On 1/28/26 at 2:35 PM, V40 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) said she was the nurse taking care of R5 on 12/25/25 when she fell. V40 said she heard R5 yelling and found her lying on the floor at the foot of her bed on her right hip and supporting herself with her right hand. V40 said R5 was confused and tried to stand up to walk to her closet and told V40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-07-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to manage a resident's pain during bathing and wound care. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R36) reviewed for pain management in the sample of 19. This failure resulted in R36 crying in pain during bed bath, wound treatment, and repositioning. Findings include: According to the face sheet R36 was admitted to facility on April 2, 2024, with multiple diagnoses including diabetes mellitus with neuropathic arthropathy, pressure ulcers, morbid obesity and end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis. R36's MDS dated [DATE], shows resident has moderately impaired cognition, and is totally dependent on staff to complete most ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). On July 16, 2024, at 1:08 PM, V7 and V8 (Certified Nursing Assistants, CNAs) gave R36 a bed bath. R36 complained of pain, flinched, and grimaced throughout process. During perineal care R36 cried out multiple times during cleaning of abdominal folds. These areas were visibly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident did not develop an avoidable pressure injury from wearing an abdominal binder.This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for Quality of Care/Treatment in a sample of 4.The findings include:R4's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR showed that R4 had multiple diagnoses, including unspecified dementia, personal history of traumatic brain injury, gastrostomy status, epileptic seizures related to external causes, not intractable, with status epilepticus, functional quadriplegia, constipation, sepsis unspecified organism, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and heart failure unspecified, R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated June 7, 2026, showed R4 had cognitive impairment, required maximum assistance with personal hygiene, and was dependent on staff for toileting and bathing.R4's POS (Physician Order Set) dated March 4, 2026, showed an order for Abdominal binder: resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide 2 assists for a full mechanical lift transfer in accordance with their policy. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for full mechanical lift transfer in the sample of 5. The findings include:R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged from the facility on February 14, 2026. R1 was admitted with multiple diagnoses including quadriplegia C6-C7 incomplete, post laminectomy syndrome, muscle wasting, chronic venous insufficiency, cellulitis of the right lower leg and stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacral region. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated February 3, 2026, showed R1 was cognitively intact and required assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) including independent with eating, set up assistance with oral hygiene and personal hygiene, partial assistance with upper body dressing, substantial assistance with bathing and bed mobility and dependent on staff for lower body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide mechanical soft diet as per physician orders.This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R11) reviewed for safe diet consistency in a sample of 23 residents.On 1/21/26 at 11:58 AM, R11 was observed in the dining room, being fed lunch by V28 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant). R11's plate had the following on it: sauteed broccoli, mandarin oranges, chicken salad sandwich, potato chips, and nectar thick root beer.R11's POS (Physician Order Sheet) shows an order dated 1/24/25: regular diet, mechanical soft texture, nectar/mildly thick liquid consistency. R11's Care Plan created 4/4/23 and last revised 2/3/25 states resident is at risk for alteration in nutrition/hydration status secondary to frequent propelling, coughing/choking episodes, increased lethargy, and need for feeding assistance. Interventions include: provide and serve diet as ordered .Resident is receiving mechanical soft, nectar thick liquids.On 1/21/26 at 12:11 PM, V20 (Dietician)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent prior to a wound procedure of a cognitively impaired resident. This failure resulted in the facility obtaining a wound biopsy without consent from R2's family.This applies to 1 of 1 (R2) resident reviewed for resident's rights.The findings include:R2 was [AGE] years old. R2 had multiple diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, aphasia, dysphagia, acute and chronic respiratory failure, and lobar pneumonia per the Face Sheet. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 06/06/25 showed R2 had severe cognitive impairment.R2's Specialty Physician Wound Evaluation & Management Summary dated 07/10/25 showed, Skin tear wound of the left shoulder, full thickness. Wound size 1.7 x 1.5 x 0.1 cm. Moderate serous exudate. 100% granulation tissue. Wound progress not at goal due to suspicious non healing lesion. Procedure: Biopsy of a skin tear wound of the left shoulder. Consent for procedure: The rationale for biopsy, alternative options, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinent care to dependent residents. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R1-R5) reviewed for activities of daily (ADL) care in a sample of 5. The Findings Include: 1. R1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and having severe cognitive impairment as per the MDS dated [DATE]. On 8/31/24 at 11:00 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that she heard about the incident and that the ambulance people were complaining that R1 was not clean when they picked him up on 8/24/24 to the hospital. On 8/31/24 at 12:20 PM, V8 (R1's certified nursing assistant / CNA) stated, I heard that EMS (Emergency Medical Service) was complaining that R1 was not super clean at the time of pick up at around 1:45 PM on 8/24/24. I didn't see any bowel movement when EMS picked him up, and I was with another resident. He didn't have a bowel movement for the last 3-4 days. On 8/31/24 at 11:00 AM, V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing / ADON) stated, I was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure carrots had smooth consistency for residents who required a pureed diet. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R16, R20, R38, and R47) reviewed for dietary needs in the sample of 19. The findings include: R16's EMR (Electronic Medical records) showed R16 had multiple diagnoses including vascular dementia, and dysphagia. R16's active order summary report showed an order dated November 16, 2023 for regular diet, pureed texture. R20's EMR showed R20 had multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and traumatic brain injury. R20's active order summary report showed an order dated August 21, 2023 for regular diet, pureed texture. R38's EMR showed R38 had multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia and feeding difficulties. R38's active order summary report showed an order dated March 22, 2024 for regular diet, pureed texture. R47's EMR showed R47 had multiple diagnoses including cerebral atherosclerosis and metabolic encephalopathy. R47's active order summary report showed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices related to hand hygiene and gloving during provisions of ADL (activities of daily living) care and wound care. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that a urinary catheter bag was not placed on the floor. This applies 5 of the 19 residents (R26, R36, R39, R40, R53) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. R26 was on Enhance Barrier Precaution (EBP) due to gastrostomy tube according V11 and V17 (both Certified Nursing Assistants, CNA). On July 16, 2024, at 12:15 PM, V11 and V17 (Both CNA/Certified Nursing Assistants) provided grooming care to R26. After V11 completed the care, she removed her gloves and sanitized her hands, then she carried R26's soiled gown with her bare hands without a plastic linen bag and carried it through the hallway into the soiled linen room. 2. On July 16, 2024, at 2:19 PM, V17 and V20 (Both CNAs) assisted R40 to the toilet.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident that was assessed to require assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R436) in the sample of 19. The findings include: R436's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R436's most recent admission to the facility was on July 10, 2024. R436's diagnoses included generalized muscle weakness, Alzheimer's with late onset, dementia, polyneuropathy, and ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase) in his urine requiring him to be in contact isolation. R436's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated July 16, 2024, showed R436 had severe cognitive impairment. R436 was recently discharged from this facility on February 2, 2024. His MDS was incomplete at the time of the survey due to recent admission. On July 15, 2024, at 11:02 AM, R436 was in bed asleep. He was unshaven and his nails were noted to be reaching out past the end of his fingers and were uneven and jagged. On July 16, 2024, at 11:45 AM, R436 was sitting up in his room, he said he would like to be shaved and have his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and administer the pneumonia vaccines to new and current residents residing in the facility. This applies to 3 of 6 residents (R29, R53, R286) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. R29's Electronic Medical record (EMR) showed R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The medical record failed to show R29 had received any pneumonia vaccines. The medical record failed to show that the facility had offered any type of pneumonia vaccine to the resident. 2. R53's EMR showed R53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R53 received the pneumococcal conjugate 13-valent vaccine prior to his admission on [DATE]. R53 would have been eligible for the PPSV-23 (Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine) one year later. R53's medical record failed to show the facility offered the PPSV 23 vaccine to the resident. 3. R286's EMR showed R286 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There wasn't any documentation to show R286 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer the Covid-19 vaccine to new and current residents residing in the facility. This applies to 2 of 6 residents (R286 and R437) reviewed for Covid-19 immunizations in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. R286 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There wasn't any documentation to show R286 had been offered the Covid-19 vaccines. The medical record showed R286 had received one dose of the Covid-19 vaccine on September 20, 2021 and the medical record failed to show the facility had offered R286 the Covid vaccine on or after his admission to this facility. 2. R437 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The medical record showed she had not received any Covid-19 vaccines. The medical record failed to show that the facility offered the Covid-19 vaccine to R437. On July 17, 2024, at 2:26 PM, V12 (Vice President of Post-Acute Care) said she was unable to locate any other vaccine record for R286. On July 16, 2024, at 2:19 PM, V4 (Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 19 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to resolve residents' concerns. This applies to 3 of 6 residents (R2, R4 and R5) reviewed for call light concerns in the sample of 8. The findings include: 1. On July 2, 2024 at 3:33 PM, R5 was in bed, alert, oriented and verbally responsive. R5 stated that the staff takes too long to answer his call light and that there are times that it takes more than 30 minutes for the staff to respond. According to R5 he would activate his call light when he needed assistance from the staff. R5's MDS (minimum dated set) dated June 28, 2024 showed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R5 was cognitively intact and would require maximum assistance from the staff with most of his ADLs (activities of daily living), including lower body dressing and transfer. The same MDS showed that R5 was frequently incontinent of both bowel and bladder functions and required total assistance from the staff with regards to toileting hygiene. Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for incontinence. Findings include: R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2 has primary diagnoses that includes spondylosis with myelopathy, functional quadriplegia, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, major depressive disorder and tremor. R2's care plan dated 4/5/24 includes ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit related to limited mobility, musculoskeletal impairment and functional quadriplegia. Functional bladder incontinence related to impaired mobility, and physical limitations. Interventions include to clean peri area with each incontinent episode. On 4/30/24 at 11:25 AM R2 stated the staff had not checked in on him and he needed to be washed. R2 stated the staff do not always check and turn him every two hours. On 4/30/24 at 11:33 AM V4 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was asked by surveyor to provide incontinence care to R2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide skin assessments for skin injuries. This applies to 3 of 4 residents (R1, R3 and R4) reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include: 1. R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 4/22/24. R1 has diagnoses that includes cellulitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic gout, malignant neoplasm of prostate, type 2 diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic kidney disease, hypertension and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery. Care plan dated 4/17/24 has Risk for impaired skin integrity. Interventions includes evaluate skin for blanching, redness, excoriation and skin integrity. Provide skin care per facility guidelines and as needed. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/22/24 shows R1 is cognitively intact. R1 required partial staff assistance with toilet transfers. R1 was assessed to be always continent of bowel and bladder. R1's hospital discharge paperwork includes an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-04 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post the daily staffing. This effects all 87 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 08/01/23 at 9:27am there was no posting of the facility's Daily Staffing at the reception desk. V11 (Receptionist) said that she has never seen the Daily Staffing posted since she has been working at the facility and she has never been taught how to post the staffing for the day. On 08/01/23 at 10:05am V1 Administrator said, I have been here for nine months, and we have never posted it. I know we are supposed to, but it just slipped through the cracks. On 8/3/23 at 12:58pm V2 Director of Nursing said that the facility's Daily Staffing should be posted at the front desk, and he has not seen it posted in the last nine months.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, label, and discard food to prevent risk of foodborne illnesses. The facility failed to meet the cooked food temperature requirements to prevent the risk of foodborne illnesses. The facility also failed to fill out the temperature logs completely. This applies to 85 out 87 residents eating from the kitchen supply of food. The findings include: On 8/1/23 at 10:30 AM, freezer one had six pies left uncovered, unlabeled, and undated, a bag of chicken tenders left open to air, and an undated bag of fries left open to air. The dry good storage area had the following cans without received on dates: 3 cans of diced tomatoes, 2 cans of vanilla pudding, 5 cans of baked beans, 4 cans of banana pudding, 2 cans of pumpkin, 1 can of great northern beans, 6 cans of tapioca pudding, 6 cans of lemon pudding, 4 cans of diced pears, 7 cans of mandarin oranges, 7 cans of clam juice, 5 cans of chunk light tuna in water, and 4 cans of corn beef hashed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow contact isolation precautions and perform hand hygiene during incontinent care and wound care. This applies to all 87 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. R176's POS (Physician Order Sheet) shows order entered on 8/1/23 stating contact isolation until 24 hours post Natroba treatment for suspected scabies. R176's MAR (Medication Administration Record) shows Natroba was given on 8/1/23 at 4:27AM. On 8/1/23 at 11:25AM, V15 CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) was observed entering the shared room of R176 and R29. V15 put on isolation gown and gloves before entering the room from supply bin located outside R176 and R29's room. Sign observed on R176 and R29's door showing contact precautions. V15 said R176 was diagnosed with scabies on 7/31/23 but R29, her roommate, did not have scabies. At this time, R29 was not in her room. On 8/1/23 at 11:38AM, R29 was observed propelling herself down the hallway in her power wheelchair and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for 9 residents (R2, R11, R18, R21, R20 R24, R29, R58, R18, and R176) in a sample of 29. The findings include: 1. On 08/01/23 at 11:09 AM, R2 was in his bed and his bed was in a high position. V10 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) said that R2's care plan showed that he was a risk for falls, but it doesn't say that his bed needs to be in a low position. R2's 7/5/23 care plan shows R2 has paralysis and has interventions that include to educate caregivers about safety and follow facility fall protocol. On 08/01/23 at 11:45 AM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) came to R2's room and said that R2's bed should be lower because he is a fall risk and then V2 lowered R2's bed. 2. On 08/01/23 at 12:05 PM a plastic bag with 3 4X5 inch antimicrobial dressings and a pair of scissors were found in R24's bedside table. On 8/3/23 at 12:58pm, V2 said that scissors should not be left in the resident's room. They should be left with the nurse for safety reasons. 3. On 08/01/23 at 12:50 PM a curling iron…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to contain reusable nebulizer treatment, oxygen masks, oxygen nasal cannula's, and CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) masks in a protective bag This applies to 5 residents (R7, R20, R24, R58, and R226) reviewed for respiratory care in a sample of 29. Findings include: 1. On 08/01/23 at 11:51 AM, R20's oxygen mask was observed uncovered on the chair next to her bed, her CPAP mask was observed uncovered on her bedside table, R20's respiratory flutter device was observed uncovered on her bedside table, and spirometer was observed uncovered on the bedside table. 2. On 08/01/23 at 12:05 PM R24's Oxygen tubing including nasal canula was observed on the floor uncovered. 3. On 08/01/23 at 12:50 PM R58 a nasal cannula was observed uncovered. R58 said The last time I used my oxygen was yesterday. They don't put my nasal cannula in a plastic bag like they put my CPAP mask in a plastic bag. R58's respiratory flutter device was observed uncovered on her bedside table. R58 said, The last time I used it was about a week ago. 4.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to appropriately store medications and biologicals safely for 8 residents (R2, R13, R20, R24, R50, R55, R61, and R226) in a sample of 29. 1. On [DATE] at 11:09 AM during a tour of R50's room, R50's Nizoral medicated shampoo was observed on his bedside table, 2 tubes of Cortisone cream 2oz , 1 tube of INZO anti-fungal cream, 2 syringes with 0.9 % sodium were observed in his bedside table. R50's electronic medical record showed that his mental cognition is severely impaired. 2. On [DATE] at 11:09 AM during a tour of R2's room showed 1 tube of Zinc paste at the bedside table. R2's electronic record showed that his cognition is moderately impaired. 3. On [DATE] at 11:51 AM during a tour of R20's room showed a jar of prescription Mineral cream (was observed without a lid), 1 open bottle of 1000ml sterile water for irrigation without an open date marked on the bedside table, 1 sterile clean catch urine specimen container was observed in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to keep residents' call lights within reach. This applies to 2 residents R13 and R18 in a sample of 29. The findings include: 1. On 8/2/23 at 9:00 am R13 was observed in bed and her call pad was observed hanging off the bed out of R13's reach. V10 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was present in R13's room at the time giving R13 her medications and repositioned R13 in her bed but failed to place R13's call pad within R13 reach. R13's care plan dated 5/12/23 showed that she is a risk for falls with interventions to keep call light and personal belongings within reach. 2. On 8/2/23 at 9:35am R18 was observed in bed and her call light was observed on the floor. V10 was present in R18's room at the time giving R18 her medication and failed to place R18's call light back within her reach. R18's care plan dated 6/30/23 shows that she has a risk for falls with interventions including to keep resident's call light within reach. On 8/4/23 at 12:58pm V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said all call lights should be within reach.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide incontinent care in a timely manner. This applies to 1 resident (R53) reviewed for incontinent care in the sample of 29. R53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the admission face sheet. The current physician orders dated August 1, 2023, showed that R53 had diagnoses of fractured right and left femur, heart disease with failure, kidney disease, diabetes, morbid obesity, chronic lung disease, sleep apnea, depression, anxiety, myocardial infarction, constipation, overactive bladder, myocardial infarction, previous pressure on thoracic spine and neoplasm of colon and prostate. On August 1, 2023, at 9:15am foul odors were present just outside the conference room by the reception area. At 9:45am just a few doors down from the conference hall the foul odor was very strong. R8 was receiving personal care but no one was in providing care to R53 who also had a very strong odor. R53 was sleeping. On August 1, 2023, at 10:00am R53 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide, administer, or notify the nurse practitioner of an unavailable weekly medication. The facility also failed to properly obtain a blood sample for a blood glucose monitor. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R20, R24, R435) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 27. The findings include: 1. On 8/1/23 at 12:57 PM, R435 called her daughter to bring her Trulicity (diabetes injection medication) from her home supply. R435 said she took a weekly dose of Trulicity on Mondays and it had not been administered on 7/31/23 when it was due at the facility. R435 said her blood glucose levels had not been under control since being in the facility. On 8/3/23 at 10:40 AM, R435 said her blood glucose levels were normally better controlled at home and did not exceed above 200 mg (Milligram) per dL (Deciliter). R435 said her levels had been in the 200's to 300's since being in the facility and she was very upset about it. R435 said when she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin as ordered and failed to notify the nurse practitioner of missed medication. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R435) reviewed for significant medication errors in a sample of 27. The findings include: On 8/1/23 at 12:57 PM, R435 said her blood glucose levels were not under control as they had been at home. R435 said the facility staff had not given her dose of morning insulin until an hour ago. R435 said her blood glucose level was 348 mg/dL (Milligram per Deciliter) this morning and she was not getting the correct amount of insulin to cover her carbohydrate consumption and her correction dose for elevated blood glucose levels. On 8/3/23 at 10:40 AM, R435 said she was upset about the insulin administration as it was inconsistent, and her levels were not within her normal range. The admission face sheet shows R435 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming/hygiene care for residents who requires extensive assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) care. This applies to 4 of 6 residents (R8, R20, R53, R54) reviewed for activities of daily living care in the sample of 17. The finding include: 1. R20's medical record indicates that R20 is 91 years-old with multiple medical diagnoses to include functional quadriplegia and low back pain. Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that R20 is alert and oriented and requires extensive assistance for personal hygiene/grooming. On 5/10/22 at 10:07 AM, R20 was resting in bed displaying overgrown facial hair in the chin and under the chin which was already curled up. When state representative asked R20 how she felt about her facial hair and if she wanted it shaven, R20 touched her chin and responded, I didn't know it was long, nobody had bugged me about it. I would like it taken out. 2. R8's medical record indicates that R8 is 76…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed follow standard infection control practices related to hand hygiene and gloving during provisions of care. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R9, R36, R46, R55) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 17. The findings include: 1. On 5/10/22 at 10:43 AM, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) assisted R46 to the toilet where she (R46) voided and did a bowel movement. After R46 completed voiding and bowel movement, V4 cleaned R46's mid and back peri-area. V4 proceeded to pull up R46's incontinence brief and pants, assisted R46 to transfer back to wheelchair, touched wheelchair handle and attached the clip of the body alarm to R46 while wearing same gloves. 2. On 5/10/22 at 2:07 PM, V4 and V7 (Both CNA) assisted R55 to the toilet where she voided and had a bowel movement. On 5/10/22 at 2:16 PM, after R55 completed her voiding and bowel movement, V4 assisted R55 to stand up on the sit to stand lift and wiped R55 from behind. V4 proceeded to pull up the incontinence brief and pants, straightened Carol's clothes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that safety measure is followed during activities of daily living (ADL) care assistance for residents who are identified as a risk for fall. This applies to 2 of 2 resident (R36, R55) reviewed for fall risk in the sample of 17. The findings include: 1. R36's medical record indicates that R36 is 99 years-old with multiple medical diagnoses which includes arthritis and osteoporosis. Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates that R36 requires extensive assistance by 2 staffs for transfer during ADL care. Fall assessment dated [DATE] showed a score of 25 which indicates that R36 is at risk for fall. On 5/10/22 at 11:03 AM, R36 was sitting on her wheelchair in her room. R36 is alert and oriented and she gave the following statement: R36 had a fall incident while she was being transferred by V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) from her wheelchair to the bed via sit to stand machine. R36 was placed to the bed on a sitting position.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide peri-care in a manner that would prevent urinary tract infection (UTI). This applies to 3 of 4 residents (R36, R46, R55) reviewed for bowel and bladder care in the sample of 17. The findings include: 1. On 5/10/22 at 10:43 AM, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) assisted R46 to the toilet where she voided and had a bowel movement. After R46 completed her voiding and bowel movement, V4 assisted R46 to stand up and wiped from behind R46. V4 proceeded to pull up the incontinence brief and pants, however, V4 did not wipe or clean R46's frontal peri-area. 2. On 5/10/22 at 2:07 PM, V4 and V7 (Both CNA) assisted R55 to the toilet where she voided and had a bowel movement. On 5/10/22 at 2:16 PM, after R55 completed her voiding and bowel movement, V4 assisted R55 to stand up on the sit to stand lift and wiped R55 from behind. V4 proceeded to pull up the incontinence brief and pants, however, V4 did not wipe or clean R55's frontal peri-area. 3. On 5/10/22 at 11:27 AM, V4 assisted R36 to the toilet where she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish specific diagnosis and targeted behavior for the use of anti-psychotic medication for a resident who has Dementia. In addition, the facility also failed to re-assess a resident's order for the continued use of anti-anxiety medication which was ordered prn (as needed). This applies 2 of 5 residents (R9 and R37) reviewed for psychotropic medications in the sample of 17. The findings include: R9's medical record showed that R9 is 83 years-old with multiple medical diagnoses which include, unspecified Alzheimer's disease, Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with behavioral disturbance. R9's physician order sheet (POS) indicated that at present R9 is receiving Risperidone 2 mg po two times a day. The previous POS dated 8/20/21 showed that R9 was started on Risperidone 4 mg twice daily. On 5/10/22 at 1:36 PM, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) provided care for R9 who was resting in bed incontinence care provided. R9 has flat affect, no acting out behavior displayed. V4 stated that R9 is the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-07-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespreadHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to make residents aware of their right to organize and participate in residents' group/council meeting. This applies to all the 92 residents in the facility. The findings include: On July 16, 2024, at 12:58 PM, a resident group meeting was conducted with R1, R9, R14, R26, R57, R59, R70, R76, and R81. These residents were all alert and oriented based on their most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS). These residents were asked if they ever attended a monthly resident council meeting or if the facility provide a place to conduct a resident council meeting. The above residents all responded that they were not aware of their right to organize and participate in resident group/council meeting. R59, who was the newly elected president of the Resident Council stated that she was not aware of it, and this was the first resident group meeting that she ever attended since she came to the facility. R70 on the other hand, said that someone came to asked him in passing how he was doing or if he ever had concern, but the staff did not sit down…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$189,285 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $17,665 — penalty dated 2026-04-17
- $171,620 — penalty dated 2026-02-10
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-17 for 17 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BENNETT, JEFF | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2022 |
| FROGGE, MARGARET | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2017 |
| HOEKSTRA, JERRY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2022 |
| O'GORMAN, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2022 |
| PAYNE, BRUCE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/11/2011 |
| SCHILTZ, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/11/2011 |
| STRASMA, NORMAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2022 |
| TYSON, DAVE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2022 |
| KAMBIC, PHILLIP | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 10/11/2011 |
| SCHILTZ, REBECCA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2025 |
| VILT, PATRICIA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2025 |
| RIVERSIDE MEDICAL CENTER | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2024 |
| FEAR, ROXANNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| ISSA, RASHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $395K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145843. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.