No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Plymouth Place

315 North La Grange Road, La Grange Park, IL 60526 · Non profit - Corporation · 86 certified beds · (708) 482-6668 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (708) 482-6668 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
321 N La Grange Rd · (888) 584-7888 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
507 E Woodlawn Ave · (708) 352-5747 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi<0.1 mi
333 N La Grange Rd · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Tilden Ave & Ogden Ave, 150 Linden Ave · (708) 352-1762 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased35.5%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.5%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.9%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.3%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.6%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.9%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.5%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.0%91.8%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.8%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.5%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.4%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.8%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.4%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.0%13.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.892.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.682.221.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 649 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.75U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.37hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.30hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 194 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.7%CMS range 64.1–72.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 9.8–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 6.3–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.57
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.40
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.56
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.33
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 76.2 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.69 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.70 to 1.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2025-01-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's non-healing, chronic wounds were assessed by a physician, failed to do a wound assessment prior to a resident's discharge from the facility, and failed to provide wound treatments as ordered by the physician. This failure resulted in R1 being admitted to the hospital within 25 hours of discharge from the facility with a diagnosis of gangrene of the left first, second, and third toes, and requiring a left, above the knee leg amputation. This applies to 8 of 8 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, and R8) reviewed for wound care in the sample of 8. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR continues to show R1 transferred to a different nursing facility on December 10, 2024. R1 had multiple diagnoses including, acute on chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, UTI (Urinary Tract Infection, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and provide timely medical interventions for a resident with cloudy urine, thick sediments and an indwelling catheter.This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for urinary tract infection (UTI) and catheter care in the sample of 18. The findings include:R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R10's face sheet showed multiple diagnoses including pressure ulcer of the right ankle, pressure induced deep tissue damage of right heel, major depressive disorder, hearing loss, fatigue, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, muscle wasting and atrophy, protein calorie malnutrition, and chronic respiratory failure. R10's active physicians' orders showed R10 has an external urinary catheter for neurogenic bladder and an order for catheter care to be provided every shift. R10's active care plan dated December 16, 2025, showed R10 has a size 16 French catheter in place. R10 is at risk for infection related to the presence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to document pain assessment, failed to document in the eMAR (electronic Medical Administration Record) the opioid medication that was administered, and failed to monitor and document for the effectiveness and/or adverse effects of the administered opioid medication to ensure that a resident's pain was managed.This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R87) reviewed for pain management in the sample of 18.The findings include:R87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including aftercare following joint replacement surgery and presence of right artificial knee joint, based on the face sheet.R87's admission MDS (minimum data set) dated February 13, 2026 showed that the resident was cognitively intact. The same MDS showed that the resident was identified with occasional pain with pain intensity of 5 and receives scheduled pain medication and PRN (as needed) pain medication.On February 23, 2026 at 11:00 AM, R87 was sitting in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and gloving during eye medication administration and blood glucose monitoring. The facility also failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions and use personal protective equipment during wound care. This failure applies to 3 of 3 residents (R10, R68, and R88) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 18.Findings include: 1. On February 24, 2026 at 10:09 AM, V7 (Registered Nurse/RN) prepared and administered eye drop medications to R10's Right eye. At 10:18 AM after administering eye drops (Atropine 1 % eye drops) V7 performed hand hygiene using alcohol rub/sanitizer and put on a clean pair of gloves. While wearing clean gloves V7 then removed the R10's sweater from behind R10's back and placed the sweater on the back of the resident's wheelchair. V7 then picked up and handled puzzle papers and other items from R10's bedside table. At 10:20 AM without removing used gloves, performing hand hygiene, and putting a clean pair of gloves V7 proceeded to open and administer eye drops…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This applies to 77 residents in the facility receiving dietary services. Findings include: On 01/21/25 at 03:53 PM, V1 (Administrator) confirmed 77 residents were being served from dietary services on entry to the facility 01/21/25. On 01/21/25 at 09:57 AM, the kitchen tour began in the lower-level kitchen with V3 (Culinary Director) and V12 (Chef). V3 stated the kitchen serves the entire facility. 1. The dry storage contained: A dented 4lb (pound) 4oz (ounce) can of mushrooms. A dented 6lb 12 0z can of buttered beans. Two dented 6lb 12oz cans of sweet potatoes. A dented 6lb 9 oz can of sliced carrots. The facility policy Receiving Goods and Storage of Goods dated 10/19 states if questionable cans are identified after receival, remove form their storage place and place in the Dented Cans area identified in the Dry Storage. 2. On 01/21/25 at 10:15 AM, the walk-in freezer contained: Items identified by V12 as chicken tenders that had fallen out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to self-administer medications and keep them at their bedsides. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R9, R34, R235, R237) reviewed for medication storage in a sample of 23. The findings include: 1. On 01/21/25 at 11:15 AM a generic pain-relieving cream with unlabeled Lidocaine (Lidocaine Hydrochloride 4%) and unlabeled hemorrhoidal relief cream maximum strength bought from a local pharmacy was observed on R34's nightstand. R34 said family member bought medication for her. She said she rubs the pain-relieving ointment with Lidocaine on her thighs. She said she uses both creams as needed. A review of R34's POS (Physician Order Sheet) showed an order for Preparation H External Cream 1% (Hydrocortisone Rectal), apply to hemorrhoids every six hours as needed after bowel movement. There was no order for pain-relieving cream with Lidocaine, no order for the medications to stay at bedside, and no order for self-administration of medications. 2. On 01/21/25 at 10:24 AM a tube of Ketoprofen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer, position, and implement fall prevention interventions for residents at risk for falls. This applies to 4 out of 6 residents (R55, R285, R49, R12) reviewed for safety and accidents in a sample of 23. The findings include: 1. On 1/22/2025 at 3:00 PM, V5 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) and V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) were assisting R55 in bed. R55 had a bruise on his right wrist and a skin tear on his right knee. V5 said R55 had recently fallen out of bed and possibly sustained those injuries then. The left side of R55's bed was parallel to the wall with approximately 12 inches of space in between. R55's boundary mattress was not secured to the bed's frame. V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) said R55 was dependent on his care and required 2-staff assistance with his bed mobility. On 1/23/2025 at 1:00 PM, V7 (CNA) said that on 1/19/2025, she was providing incontinence care to R55 in bed when he fell out of bed. V7 said she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rooms with sharps disposal containers were safely maintained. This applies to 5 residents (R3, R73, R287, R79, and R39) reviewed for facility environment in a sample of 23. The findings include: On 1/21/2025 at 10:15 AM during the initial tour of the facility, five residents' rooms (R3, R73, R287, R79, and R39) were observed with overflowing sharps disposal containers: 1. R3's sharps disposal container located in her room was overfilled above the indicated full line and contained sharp items on top of the security flip lid. 2. R73's sharps disposal container located in her room was overfilled above the indicated full line and contained sharp items on top of the security flip lid. 3. R287's sharps disposal container located in her room was overfilled above the indicated full line and contained sharp items on top of the security flip lid. 4. R79's sharps disposal container located in her room was overfilled above the indicated full line and contained sharp items on top of the security flip…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a warm, comfortable room. This applies to 2 out of 3 residents (R77 and R67) reviewed for homelike environment in a sample of 23. The findings include: On 1/21/2025 at 1:50 PM, R77 and R67 (roommates) were in their room. R77 said he gets extra cold because the room's heater unit has not been working for weeks. On 1/21/2025 at 2:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) was asked to assess the room and said the heating unit in the room had been broken for more than a week and was still waiting to be repaired. V1 said urgent maintenance work orders should be addressed within 24 hours and non-urgent should be completed within 3-7 days. On 1/23/2025 at 8:55 AM, V4 (Director of Facilities and Safety) said he received a Maintenance Work Order request for the room's heating unit on 1/5/2025. V4 said the temperature outside the room in the hallway was checked and noted at 72 F (Fahrenheit) degrees, but the temperature inside the room was not checked on 1/6/2025. V4 said resident rooms were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident beds were safely maintained. This applies to 2 out of 3 residents (R55 and R14) reviewed for resident equipment in a sample of 23 1. R14 MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/3/25, shows he is cognitively intact. R14 requires substantial staff assistance with repositioning in bed and is dependent on staff transfers between the bed and chair. R14's current care plan includes an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care deficit related to mobility deficits and weakness. On 01/21/25 at 11:33 AM, R14 was on an airloss mattress with approximately four inches of his bed frame exposed on each side of his bed. On 01/23/25 at 11:59 AM, R14 was still on an air mattress with approximately four inches of his bed frame exposed on each side of his bed. On 01/23/25 at 01:30 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated staff that provide direct care are responsible for making sure the bed is safe for the resident. If there is any issue the direct care staff should place a work order to maintenance to have the equipment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label, date, seal, and store food items in the kitchen. This applies to all residents that receive oral nutrition and foods prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (Form CMS-Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-671) dated 2/13/24 documents that the total census was 68 residents. On 2/14/24 at 11:41 AM, V4 (Dietician) said all 68 residents eat from the facility kitchen. On 2/13/24 from 10:41 AM through 11:40 AM, the facility kitchen was toured in the presence of V5 (Director of Food and Nutrition) and V6 (Executive Chef) and the following was found: In the Dairy Cooler: 1. A large sized opened bag of sliced pepperoni, no label or date. 2. A medium sized opened bag of sliced salami, no label or date. 3. An opened 3.5 pound pre-cooked buffalo chicken breast, not sealed and placed back in cardboard box, with the chicken touching the cardboard box packaging. Dry Storage: 4. Two 6 pound 15 ounce cans of tomato…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
TERPSTRA, JACKIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2018
ASPERGER, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2018
BALDWIN, MARVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2013
BARRETT, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2018
BIERE, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2018
BRYANT, DORISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2013
CLOGHESSY, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2018
LAPALIO, LAWRENCEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2018
SERAFIN, THORNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2018
THIESSEN, MIKEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2018
WEYRAUCH, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2018
MATHIS, REBECCAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/28/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 35%Other / private 65%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,485per resident / day
operating cost
$45,156per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$155per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Illinois Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146128. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next